20121105 no tempest in my teapot [dlf forum denver]
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

20121105 no tempest in my teapot [dlf forum denver]






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 112

http://www.diglib.org 112



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

20121105 no tempest in my teapot [dlf forum denver] 20121105 no tempest in my teapot [dlf forum denver] Presentation Transcript

  • No tempest in my teapot:Analysis of Crowdsourced Data and User Experiences at the California Digital Newspaper Collection Brian Geiger Director, Center for Bibliographical Studies and Research California Digital Newspaper Collection Frederick Zarndt Chair, IFLA Newspapers Section Photo held by John Oxley Library, State Library of Queensland. Original from Courier-mail, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Crowds
  • The Wisdom of CrowdsIn 2004 James Surowiecki published “The Wisdomof Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than theFew and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business,Economies, Societies and Nations”. In it he asserts a crowd of persons that are diverse, independent, and decentralized usually make better judgements or decisions than single persons
  • “crowdsourcing”was coined by Jeff Howe in “The rise ofcrowdsourcing” published in Wired magazine June2006.
  • A Google advanced search for“crowdsourcing” from 1-Jun-2006, the date of publication of Jeff Howe’s Wired magazine article, to 1-Jun-2007 gives 44,600 hits.A date range of 1-Jun-2011 to 1-Jun-2012 gives 2,680,000 hits. Searches used the Internet Archives’ Wayback Machine
  • Crowdsourcing is a process that involves outsourcing tasks to a distributed group of people. ... the difference between crowdsourcing and ordinary outsourcing is that a task or problem is outsourced to an undefined public rather than a specific body, such as paid employees.Wikipedia contributors, "Crowdsourcing," Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdsourcing(accessed June 1, 2012)
  • Crowdsourcing is a type of participative online activity in which an individual, an institution, a non-profit organization, or company proposes to a group of individuals of varying knowledge, heterogeneity, and number, via a flexible open call, the voluntary undertaking of a task. The undertaking of the task, of variable complexity and modularity, and in which the crowd should participate bringing their work, money, knowledge and/or experience, always entails mutual benefit. The user will receive the satisfaction of a given type of need, be it economic, social recognition, self-esteem, or the development of individual skills, while the crowdsourcer will obtain and utilize to their advantage that what the user has brought to the venture, whose form will depend on the type of activity undertaken.Enrique Estellés-Arolas and Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara. Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition.Journal of Information Science XX(X). 2012. pp. 1-14.
  • crowdcollaboration crowd* crowdsourcing ng di citizen science un dfowcrcrowdcasting crowdvoting
  • what is Alexa?• Alexa collects and analyzes Internet data for purposes of web analytics. Web analytics is the measurement, collection, analysis and reporting of Internet data for the purposes of understanding and optimizing web usage. Alexa is now a subsidiary of Amazon.• Alexa was founded in 1996 by Brewster Kahle (Internet Archive) and Bruce Gilliat.• Alexa operations includes archiving of webpages as they are crawled. This database served as the basis for the creation of the Internet Archive accessible through the Wayback Machine.• Alexa continually crawls all publicly-available websites to create a series of snapshots of the web.• Alexa gathers information from a variety of sources to provide key statistics about each site on the web, for example, Traffic Rank, the number of PageViews, and site Speed, Bounce Rate, etc. This information is derived from Alexa toolbar users (~6,000,000 worldwide).
  • definitions • A PageView is a request for a file whose type is defined as a page. • A Unique Visitor is a uniquely identified client generating requests on the web server or viewing pages within a defined time period (i.e. day, week or month). A Unique Visitor counts once within the timescale. • A Visit is a series of page requests from the same uniquely identified client with a time of no more than 30 minutes between each page request. • Bounce Rate is the percentage of visits where the visitor enters and exits at the same page without visiting any other pages on the site in between. • World | Country Rank is a function of the average daily unique visits and the number of unique pages requested.definitions adapted from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_analytics
  • crowdsourcing Amazon Mechanical Turk was launched Nov 2005Alexa global rank of Amazon Mechanical Turk (13-Jun-2012): 6,022
  • crowdsourcingEach day 200,000,000 recaptcha’s are solved by humans around the world
  • crowdvoting Iowa Electronic Market was 1st launched in 1995 Alexa global traffic rank of Iowa Electronic Market (6-Aug-2012): 11,290 Alexa US traffic rank of Iowa Electronic Market (6-Aug-2012): 3,923
  • citizen science Galaxy Zoo was 1st launched July 2007Alexa global traffic rank of Galaxy Zoo (13-Jun-2012): 557,766
  • crowdfunding Kickstarter was 1st launched in 2008 Alexa global traffic rank of Kickstarter (6-Aug-2012): 75227,528 projects successfully funded with more than USD $254,000,000
  • crowdcollaboration
  • Wikipedia• Began 2001• Now in 285 languages• 3,900,000+ articles in English, 1,400,000+ in German, 1,250,000+ in French, 1,050,000 in Dutch• 40 wikipedia languages with more than 100,000 articles• 112 wikipedia languages with more than 10,000 articles• 400,000,000 unique visitors per month• 85,000 active contributors• Alexa global traffic rank: #6 in worldwide web traffic
  • Family Search Indexing was 1st launched (beta) 2004Alexa global / country traffic rank of FamilySearch (13-Jun-2012): 4,352 / 1,357
  • • Started (beta) 2004• More than 780,000 worldwide registered volunteers from ~25 countries index records relevant to family history• Approximately 100,000 active volunteers each month• UI in Chinese, English, German, French, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Russian• Blind double-key entry with arbitration / reconciliation• More than 1,500,088,741 records indexed (July 2012)• Accuracy typically > 99.95%
  • Project Gutenberg was 1st launched Dec 1971Alexa global traffic rank of Project Gutenberg (13-Jun-2012): 5,744
  • • Started Dec 1971• Worldwide volunteers transcribe or proofread OCR’d public domain books through Distributed Proofreaders• 40,000 books completed (July 2012)• Partner / affiliated projects for Australia, Canada, Europe, Germany, Luxembourg, Philippines, Runeberg (Nordic literature), Russia, Taiwan
  • Alexa global / country traffic rank of National Library of Australia (31-Oct-2012): 15,519 / 406 Trove gets ~72% of all National Library web traffic.
  • National Library of Australia• Online since 2008• 7,200,000+ pages• Top text corrector 1,250,000 lines (June 2012)• 2,450,000+ lines corrected each month (average for 1st 6 months 2012)• 68,908,757 lines corrected as of July 2012, up from 42,411,468 lines corrected July 2011.• 63,613 total registered users (July 2012)• 4,146 active users (June 2012)
  • Alexa global / country traffic rank of National Library of Finland 2,535,854 (31-Oct-2012) / 199 (2-Apr-2012)
  • National Library of Finland• Digitalkoot is a project to improve OCR text in digitized newspapers -- by playing games!• Digitalkoot is a collaboration between the National Library and Microtask• Players correct OCR text by playing Myyräsillassa (Mole Bridge) or Myyräjahdissa (Mole Hunt)• National Library has 4,000,000+ digitized pages• 109,321 registered players (October 2012)• Since February 2011 8,024,530 micro-tasks have been completed
  • Alexa global / country traffic rank of UC Riverside (31-Oct-2012): 12,439 / 4,717 CDNC gets ~1.84% of all UC Riverside web traffic.
  • California Digital Newspaper Collection• CDNC began digitizing newspapers in 2005 as part of NDNP• Newspapers digitized to article-level as well as to page-level as required by NDNP• Hosted on Veridian beginning 2009• Collection size 55,970 issues, 495,175 pages, 5,658,224 articles, 498,000,000+ lines
  • OCR text correction• OCR text correction added August 2011• Corrections are done line by line• ~578,000+ lines of text corrected (Oct 2012)• ~1.1% of the collection corrected, 98.9% to go!• Top corrector 243,000 lines > 2x 2nd corrector
  • User Lines corrected Lines corrected User 1 242,965 1,456,906 1 2 87,515 1,385,369 2 3 31,318 1,010,360 3 4 24,144 960,230 4 5 23,184 847,340 5 6 19,240 786,147 6 7 18,898 657,187 7 8 16,875 600,513 8 9 11,784 582,276 9 10 9,762 565,384 10
  • uncorrected OCR accuracy by newspaper title OCR character ~OCR word Title accuracy accuracy* PRP Pacific Rural Press 1871 - 1922 92.6% 68.1% SFC San Francisco Call 1890 - 1913 92.6% 68.1% LAH Los Angeles Herald 1873 - 1910 88.7% 54.9% LH Livermore Herald 1877 - 1899 88.6% 54.6% DAC Daily Alta California 1841 - 1891 88.2% 53.4% CFJ California Farmer and Journal 86.5% 48.4% of Useful Sciences 1855 - 1880 SN Sausalito News 1885 - 1922 70.4% 17.3%*Word accuracy assumes average word length is 5 characters
  • OCR accuracy by newspaper title OCR character Corrected Title accuracy accuracyPRP Pacific Rural Press 1871 - 1922 92.6% 99.3%SFC San Francisco Call 1890 - 1913 92.6% 99.6%LAH Los Angeles Herald 1873 - 1910 88.7% 99.1%LH Livermore Herald 1877 - 1899 88.6% 99.9%DAC Daily Alta California 1841 - 1891 88.2% 99.9%CFJ California Farmer and Journal 86.5% 99.8%of Useful Sciences 1855 - 1880SN Sausalito News 1885 - 1922 70.4% 100.0%
  • corrected accuracy by newspaper title OCR character ~OCR word Corrected ~Corrected Title accuracy accuracy* accuracy word accuracy* PRP 1871 - 1922 92.6% 68.1% 99.3% 96.5% SFC 1890 - 1913 92.6% 68.1% 99.6% 98.0% LAH 1873 - 1910 88.7% 54.9% 99.1% 95.6% LH 1877 - 1899 88.6% 54.6% 99.9% 99.5% DAC 1841 - 1891 88.2% 53.4% 99.9% 99.5% CF 1855 - 1880 86.5% 48.4% 98.3% 91.8% SN 1885 - 1922 70.4% 17.3% 100.0% 100.0%*Word accuracy assumes average word length is 5 characters
  • correction accuracy by user Average OCR Correction User accuracy accuracy A 70.4% 100.0% B 87.1% 99.5% C 95.4% 99.5% D 86.5% 98.3% E 95.3% 100.0% F 91.0% 100.0% G 91.0% 99.8% H 90.5% 99.0% I 96.6% 99.8% J 94.8% 100.0% K 86.8% 99.3%
  • the long of crowdsourced tail * OCR text correction a probability distribution has a long tail if a larger share of population rests within its tail than it would under a normal distribution the most productive users represent a small fraction of the total user population and ~50% of total production, or, said a different way, the largest fraction but individually not quite so productive users are as important as the most productive usersThe phrase “long tail” was popularized by Chris Anderson in the October 2004 Wired magazine article The Long Tailand by Clay Shirky’s February 2003 essay “Power laws, web logs, and inequality”.
  • OCR text correction long tails 3,000,000 2,250,000 50% 300000top corrector 242,965 1,500,000 top corrector 1,456,906 225000 50% 750,000 150000 50% 0 75000 NLA lines corrected by text corector 50% 0 CDNC lines corrected by text corrector
  • MotivationGraphic from Kaufmann et al. “More than fun and money. Worker Motivationin Crowdsourcing – A Study on Mechanical Turk.”
  • Wisdom of crowds Each person should have private information Diversity even if its just an eccentric interpretation of the known facts. Peoples opinions arent determined by the Independence opinions of those around them. People are able to specialize and draw on localDecentralization knowledge. Some mechanism exists for turning private Aggregation judgments into a collective decision.James Surowiecki, The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How CollectiveWisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations, Anchor Books, New York, 2005.
  • Cognitive surplus ... people are learning to use their free time for creative activities rather than consumptive ones [such as watching TV] ... ... the total human cognitive effort in creating all of Wikipedia in every language is about one hundred million hours ... ... Americans alone watch two hundred billion hours of TV every year, or enough time, if it would be devoted to projects similar to Wikipedia, to create about 2000 of them ...Clay Shirky. Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. Penguin Press. New York. 2010.
  • Motivation Genealogists and family historians • National Library of Australia’s 2012 Trove status report showed that ~50% of Trove users are family historiansPAPERSPAST • National Library of New Zealand survey found that ~50% of PapersPast users are genealogists • California Digital Newspaper Collection spring 2012 survey discovered that ~70% of its users are genealogists; 75% are 50 years old or older • A Utah Digital Newspapers survey showed that 72% of its users are genealogists
  • Motivation Trove users’ report • “I enjoy the correction - it’s a great way to learn more about past history and things of interest whilst doing a ‘service to the community’ by correcting text for the benefit of others.” • “I have recently retired from IT and thought that I could be of some assistance to the project. It benefits me and other people. It helps with family research.”From Rose Holley in “Many Hands Make Light Work.” National Library of Australia March 2009.
  • Motivation CDNC users’ report “I am interested in all kinds of history. I have pursued genealogy as a hobby for many years. I correct text at CDNC because I see it as a constructive way to contribute to a worthwhile project. Because I am interested in history, I enjoy it.” Wesley, CaliforniaPersonal communications with CDNC text correctors.
  • Motivation CDNC users’ report “I only correct the text on articles of local interest - nothing at state, national or international level, no advertisements, etc.  The objective is to be able to help researchers to locate local people, places, organizations and events using the on-line search at CDNC.  I correct local news & gossip, personal items, real estate transactions, superior court proceedings, county and local board of supervisors meetings, obituaries, birth notices, marriages, yachting news, etc.” Ann, CaliforniaPersonal communications with CDNC text correctors.
  • Motivation CDNC users’ report “I am correcting text for the Coronado Tent City Program for 1903.  It is important to correct any problems with personal names and other information so that researchers will be able to search by keyword and be assured of retrieving desired results. ... type fonts cause a great deal of difficulty in digitizing the text and can cause problems for searchers.  Also, many of the guests names at Tent City and Hotel Del Coronado were taken from the registration books and reported in the Program.  This led to many problems in spelling of last names and the editors were not careful to be consistent in the spellings.  This Program is an important resource since it provides an excellent picture of daily life in Tent City and captures much of the history of Coronado itself.” Gene, CaliforniaPersonal communications with CDNC text correctors.
  • Motivation CDNC users’ report “I have always been interested in history, especially the development of the American West, and nothing brings it alive better than newspapers of the time. I believe them to be an invaluable source of knowledge for us and future generations.” David, United KingdomPersonal communications with CDNC text correctors.
  • Motivation CDNC users’ report CDNC is an excellent source of information matching my personal interest in such topics as sea history, development of shipbuilding, clippers and other ships etc. ... Unfortunately, the quality of text ... is rather poor I’m afraid. This is why I started to do all corrections necessary for myself ... and to leave the corrected text for use of others. .... I am not doing this very regularly as this is just my hobby and pleasure. Jerzey, PolandPersonal communications with CDNC text correctors.
  • Website traffic
  • Website traffic After a crowdsourcing transcription project of diaries from the American War Between the States, Nicole Saylor, Head of Digital Library Services at the University of Iowa Libraries, reported “On June 9, 2011, we went from about 1000 daily hits to our digital library on a really good day to more than 70,000.”Nicole Saylor interviewed by Trevor Owens. “Crowdsourcing the Civil War: Insights Interview with Nicole Saylor” blog postat http://blogs.loc.gov/digitalpreservation/2011/12/crowdsourcing-the-civil-war-insights-interview-with-nicole-saylor/.Dec 6, 2011.
  • Website traffic Website traffic at CDNC before / after implementing crowdsourcing before crowdsourcing after crowdsourcing change 11-Jun-2011 / 12-Jul-2011 11-Jun-2012 / 12-Jul-2012 visits 17,485 21,488 +22.9%unique visitors 11,381 13,376 +17.5%visit duration 9m 24s 11m 7s +18.3% bounce rate 51.3% 44.5% -6.8%pages per visit 14.9 11.7 -21.5%
  • Website traffic
  • Crowdsourcing benefits Public domain photo courtesy of US Navy
  • $ Economics Financial value of outsourced OCR text correction for newspapers? The Assumptions• 25 to 50 characters per line in a newspaper column: Assume 40 characters per line (CDNC sample average)• Outsourced text transcription or correction costs USD $0.35 to $1.20 per 1000 characters: Assume $0.50 per 1000 characters
  • $ Economics$ 578,000 lines x 40 characters per line x 1/1000 x $0.50 = $11,560$ 68,908,757 lines x 40 characters per line x 1/1000 x $0.50 = $1,378,175
  • $ Economics Financial value of in-house OCR text correction? The Assumptions • Correction takes 15 seconds per line • Cost is hourly wage plus benefits of lowest level employee, $10 for CDNC, $41.88* for AustraliaAUD $40.38 = USD $41.88 is the actual labor value assumed by the National Library of Australia to calculate avoided costsdue to crowdsourced OCR text correction in its 2012 Trove Status Report.
  • $ Economics$ 578,000 lines x 15 seconds per line x 1/3600 hrs per second x $10.00 per hr = $24,083$ 68,908,757 lines x 15 seconds per line x 1/3600 hrs per second x $41.88 per hr = $12,024,578
  • Accuracy“His Accuracy Depends on Ours!"Office for Emergency Management. Office of WarInformation. Domestic Operations Branch. Bureau ofSpecial Services. [Photo held at US National Archives andRecords Administration]
  • Accuracy • Edwin Kiljin (Koninklijke Bibliotheek the Netherlands) reports raw OCR character accuracies of 68% for early 20th century newspapers • Rose Holley (National Library of Australia) reports raw OCR character accuracy varied from 71% to 98% on a sample Trove digitized newspapersEdwin Kiljin. “The current state-of-art in newspaper digitization.” D-Lib Magazine. January/February 2008.Rose Holley. “How good can it get? Analysing and improving OCR accuracy in large scale historic newspaper digitisationprograms. D-Lib Magazine. March/April 2009.Public domain graphic courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
  • Accuracy Mapping texts* assesses digitization quality of digital newspapers by comparing the number of words recognized to the total number of words scanned*Mapping texts is a collaboration between the University of North Texas and Stanford University aimed at experimentingwith new methods for finding and analyzing meaningful patterns embedded in massive collections of digital newspapers.
  • Accuracy How does low text accuracy affect search recall? The Facts • Average uncorrected OCR character accuracy of the CDNC sample data is ~89% • Average length of an English word is 5 characters • Average word accuracy is 89% x 89% x 89% x 89% x 89% = 55.8% - round up to 60% or 6 out of 10 words correctPublic domain graphic courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
  • Search recall no text correction ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDTinstances of “ARNDT” found instances of “ARNDT” not found
  • Accuracy The Facts • Average corrected character accuracy of the CDNC sample data is ~99.4% • Average word accuracy of CDNC corrected text is 99.4% x 99.4% x 99.4% x 99.4% x 99.4% = 97.0%Public domain graphic courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
  • Search recall with text correction ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDT ARNDTinstances of “ARNDT” found instances of “ARNDT” not found
  • Accuracy A search for “Arndt” at Chronicling America gives 10,267 results* • If Chronicling America text accuracy is 55.8% (same as uncorrected CDNC sample), then 8,133 instances of “Arndt” were not found • If text accuracy is 97.0%, then 317 instances of “Arndt” were not found * Search performed 31 Oct 2012 Alexa global / country traffic rank of Library of Congress (31-Oct-2012): 4,056 / 1,317 Chronicling America gets ~7.1% of all Library of Congress web traffic.Public domain graphic courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
  • Hard-to-measure-but-shouldn’t-be-overlooked benefits Public domain photo “A useful instruction for young sailors from the Royal Hospital School, Greenwich” from the National Maritime Museum.
  • HTMBSBO benefit “when someone transcribes a document, they are actually better fulfilling the mission of a cultural heritage organization than someone who simply stops by to flip through the pages”Paraphrased from Trevor Owen’s Crowdstorming blog http://crowdstorming.wordpress.com/
  • HTMBSBO benefit “in addition to increasing search accuracy or lowering the costs of document transcription, crowdsourcing is the single greatest advancement in getting people using and interacting with library collections”Paraphrased from Trevor Owen’s Crowdstorming blog http://crowdstorming.wordpress.com/
  • Crowdsourcing considerations• How to market / advertise crowdsourcing?• How to motivate crowdsourcers?• Is authentication / identity of crowdsourcers an issue?• How to administer crowdsourced data? Photo of Aleister Crowley [Public domain] from Wikimedia Commons
  • Conclusions • Lots of crowdsourcing in cultural heritage organizations and elsewhere • Benefits are multi-faceted: Economic, data accuracy, patron engagement, increased web trafficConclusion of the Sonata for piano #32, opus 111 byLudwig van Beethoven
  • Try crowdsourcing! Correct California newspapers text http://cdnc.ucr.edu Correct Australian newspapers text http://trove.nla.gov.au Correct Cambridge MA newspapers text http://bit.ly/cambridgepublic Correct Russian language periodicals http://bit.ly/russianperiodicalsOthers soon to follow: Library of Virginia, University of Tennessee, National Library of Singapore, ...
  • ? Brian Geiger bgeiger@ucr.edu Frederick Zarndtfrederick@frederickzarndt.com Photo held by John Oxley Library, State Library of Queensland. Original from Courier-mail, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.