• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Gender Issues and Pastoral Economic Growth and Development in Ethiopia
 

Gender Issues and Pastoral Economic Growth and Development in Ethiopia

on

  • 2,110 views

This paper was written as a background note for a study of “Pastoral economic growth and development in Ethiopia” that was commissioned by the Department for International Development (DfID) at ...

This paper was written as a background note for a study of “Pastoral economic growth and development in Ethiopia” that was commissioned by the Department for International Development (DfID) at the request of the Government of Ethiopia.

It considers gender issues in pastoral development in Ethiopia based on an analysis of pastoral women’s livelihoods, preceded by a brief overview of some of the key issues facing women in Ethiopia nationally.

[ Originally posted on http://www.cop-ppld.net/cop_knowledge_base ]

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,110
Views on SlideShare
1,639
Embed Views
471

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0

2 Embeds 471

http://unjobs.org 468
http://users.unjobs.org 3

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Gender Issues and Pastoral Economic Growth and Development in Ethiopia Gender Issues and Pastoral Economic Growth and Development in Ethiopia Document Transcript

    • Gender Issues and Pastoral Economic Growth and Development in Ethiopia Cathy Watson Addis Ababa, Ethiopia January 2010Acknowledgements: This paper was written as a background note for a study of “Pastoraleconomic growth and development in Ethiopia” that was commissioned by the Departmentfor International Development (DfID) at the request of the Government of Ethiopia. The authorassumes full responsibility for the views and contents expressed in this paper.IntroductionThis Concept Note considers gender issues in pastoral development in Ethiopia based on ananalysis of pastoral women’s livelihoods, preceded by a brief overview of some of the keyissues facing women in Ethiopia nationally.Women’s rights in Ethiopia are supported by law and a number of key policy documents,including Article 35 of the Constitution, the revised Family Code, the National Policy onWomen, and the National Action Plan for Gender Equality, linked to Pillar 4 of the Plan forAccelerated and Sustained Development to End Poverty (PASDEP): ‘unleashing thepotential of Ethiopia’s women’. 1 Ethiopia is also signatory to various internationalinstruments. 2 As such, the policy framework for gender issues in Ethiopia is very positive,and is supported by key structures such asthe Ministry of Women’s Affairs; the Box 1: Selected Gender Indicators for Ethiopia • Gender-related Development Index (GDI): 142 ndplacement of Women’s Officers in each out of 157 countriesWoreda administration; and target quotas for • Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM): 84th outcouncil membership. of 108 countries • Maternal mortality: 673 deaths per 100,000 liveHowever, despite this, national statistics for births (2005)gender equality in Ethiopia do not paint a • Violence against women (including FGM): affectsvery positive picture (see Box 1 3). Ethiopia’s 73% of women and girls • Early marriage: 75% of girls marry before age 17policy provisions for gender equality are • Combined gross primary, secondary and tertiarytherefore very positive but huge challenges enrolment ratio as % of male: 76.4% (2004)remain in the implementation and application • Girls’ secondary attendance: 23% (2000-2007)of these policies in order to lead to effective • Average adult literacy: women 34%; men 49%change for most of Ethiopia’s women. 4 (notably worse in rural and remote areas) • Political representation (1999): o Members of parliament: 42 (8%)Ethiopia’s Pastoral Women and their o Regional councils: 13%Livelihoods o Woreda councils: 7%Ethiopia’s pastoralists, like pastoralists the o Kebele councils: 14%world over, remain at the margins of national • Women’s Officers in local government: generallyeconomic and political life. However pastoral underfunded and lacking support from male colleagues.women are ‘doubly marginalised’ since theyexperience the discrimination and marginalisation described above, while also living inremote, under-serviced areas, leading a lifestyle that is misunderstood by many decisionmakers.Capital Assets: Financial CapitalUnderstanding pastoral women’s access and control over livestock - a key financial assetfor pastoralists - requires moving beyond the concept of ‘ownership’ to a more complex setof rights and responsibilities, often overlooked by planners. While in most pastoral societies 1
    • the final decision to dispose of an animal by sale, gift or slaughter rests with the male headof household, his wives and even his daughters may need to be consulted and can exert aconsiderable amount of influence over this decision, related to both the origins and status ofthe individual animal (part of a woman’s bridewealth; a key milking cow, etc.) and also to thewoman’s degree of ‘informal power’ (see Social Capital below). Disposal rights are thereforecomplex, and are also connected to women’s access rights to the products of any particularanimal. Even customary pastoral inheritance law, which in most pastoral groups passeslivestock automatically along the male line, may entitle a widow to keep the livestock given toher as gifts by her husband during their marriage. 5Milking is generally carried out by women and girls in most though not all Ethiopian pastoralgroups, and the milk once obtained is generally in the exclusive control of the women. 6 Theydecide on the distribution between: family consumption; conversion into other products suchas ghee; gifts (to maintain social relationships); and sales. Depending on the terms of trade,the energy conversion rate from milk to grain can be up to 14 7 so many pastoral households,particularly the poorer, rely on sales of milk for their subsistence. At the same time, maleheads of household may influence levels of milk offtake to ensure that livestock productivitygoals are also met. 8 In this way, the ‘ownership’ of livestock products is also a set of rightsand responsibilities, a complex mix of access and mediated control between women andmen, although women undoubtedly exercise more control over livestock products than overlivestock themselves. Women generally control the cash income they receive from sales ofmilk, although if the business increases significantly in size this may change, while cashincome from the sale of livestock is generally controlled by men. 9Other financial assets include hides, skins, and handicrafts which can be sold whenmarkets are available and accessible. 10 This trade is affected by poor processing and poorquality final products, 11 as well as by the small number of micro-finance institutions and otherfinancial services in Ethiopia’s pastoral areas. Because of existing cultural norms, lack ofnumeracy and literacy, and a general gender bias in the financial sector, pastoral women’saccess to such services is even more limited than pastoral men’s.Capital Assets: Human Capital Box 2: Selected Human Capital Indicators for PastoralBox 2 presents a summary of key indicators Women in Ethiopia • Infant survival rates: males have 22% higherfor pastoral women’s health and chance of surviving to age 5 (Somali) 12education. In addition, pastoral women’s • Children’s access to health services: boy childrenworkload is acknowledged to be higher than are more likely to be taken to a health centre whenmen’s in most pastoral areas, although the sick, while a girl child may be fed herbs and otherdisparity varies between pastoral groups and traditional remedieswith season. Women’s control over their own • Life expectancy: 47 for women; 53 for men (Afar) • Population disparity: women = 44% of populationlabour varies with cultural norms, the (Afar and Somali); national average 49.5%gendered division of labour in their particular • Ante natal care access: 15% (Afar) and 7%society, and according to their status and (Somali); 28% national averagesocial capital. This also applies to their ability • Contraception use: 4% (Somali); 15% nationalto control the labour of others, in particular averagethat of the other women and girls in their • FGM practice: 97% (Somali); 74% national average Health clinic in community: 12%; nearest averagehousehold (see Figure 1 below). distance to health clinic 36km (Somali) • Limitations on women’s access to health care alsoPastoral women’s human capital includes include cultural norms about women travellingtheir knowledge and skills on animal health alone and consulting male attendantsand husbandry, livestock management, • Girls’ school attendance: 3% (Borana) • Adult women with no education: 89% (Somali) 2 • Adult literacy: women 5%; men 23% (Somali) • Constraints to girls’ education (in addition to accessibility): cultural attitudes to educating girls; heavy workloads at home; early marriage; FGM; parental concern for the girls’ personal security.
    • natural resource management and environmental conservation, much of which isunrecognised both by outsiders and sometimes within their own societies. Their humancapital may however be limited by their lack of knowledge of the market economy and theirrights under national law. In spite therefore of their indigenous knowledge, strong capacitiesand resilience, pastoral women begin life with less human capital than their malecounterparts and rarely get the opportunity to redress this balance.Capital Assets: Social CapitalSocial capital is particularly important for pastoralists compared to other livelihood groups,since their production systems depend heavily on cooperation and joint management ofshared resources. Contrary to common understanding, pastoral women exercise asignificant amount of ‘informal power, 13 connected mostly to internal rather than externaldecision making, and focusing largely on their ability to influence men. It is subject to anumber of variables, such as a woman’s age, her husband’s social standing, the number andage of her sons, and in some societies her ability to speak well and exhibit wisdom, as wellas her relationship with other members of the family, see Figure 1. Figure 1: Women’s influence in their community - Turkana, Kenya 14Pastoral women’s customary institutions, often overlooked, build on and enhance thispower. 15 Pastoral women also have informal but effective communication networks to shareinformation with each other and within the community. 16 However, their formal public roleremains constrained and their political participation is very limited. In 2006 there was onlyone woman among the 160 members of the Somali Regional parliament, and only 356women were elected out of 3,309 councillors in the 2005 district elections. 17 Nationally thereare five women MPs from pastoral areas, three of whom now sit on the Pastoral AffairsStanding Committee which until 2005 was all male. 18Since pastoral women’s informal power is based largely on their relationship to men, inparticular their husbands, it therefore follows that women-headed households can be lesspowerful socially. Female-headed households remain relatively rare among mobilepastoralists: 5% of one sample in Somali Region (compared to 13% in the urban centres). 19Women-headed households in urban and peri-urban settings may enjoy relative economicfreedom compared to their married mobile counterparts but at the same time are likely tosuffer from diminished social standing as they cannot exercise their informal power asdescribed above, particularly if they are poor. They also are likely to experience morepoverty relative to their counterparts who remain in mobile pastoral systems. 3
    • Capital Assets: Natural CapitalMajor decisions about the use of key natural resources are generally negotiated throughindigenous mechanisms such as the clan or territorially-based institutions. Women’sinfluence over these management decisions is therefore largely on the basis of their informalpower as well as the roles that they play within the management mechanisms. Day-to-day,pastoral women play a significant role in natural resource management, through their use offirewood, wild fruits, fodder and water. They also play an important role in managing theforest and its products, including non-timber forest products (NTFPs). 20Significant changes in natural resource management, e.g. land demarcation or enclosure,have an impact on gender relations, particularly if women’s role in NRM is overlooked. Forexample, the women were not involved in the decision to enclose plots of communalrangeland in Harshin, a process which is also increasing their workloads. 21 Subdivision ofpastoral land in Kenya has significantly disadvantaged pastoral women: over 99% of GroupRanch members are men. 22 Land registration is underway in Ethiopia but has not yet beenapplied to most communal pastoral land. Early impact analysis of this process in agriculturalareas indicates that the issuing of title deeds to wives as well as their husbands has thepotential to increase women’s access and control over land, although this needs to besupported with education about rights and a degree of cultural change. 23Capital Assets: Physical CapitalBecause of their remote location, pastoral areas generally suffer from poor publicinfrastructure such as access roads, means of transportation and communicationssystems. This affects all pastoralists, although women’s access may be further constrainedby cultural norms and social expectations. Pastoral women use and control a number ofprivate producer goods, including responsibility for building and maintaining the houses.As well as a productive asset, a woman’s hut can also represent a social and personal spacesymbolising her control over the food supply. Other physical capital such as milking tools andprocessing equipment, gourds, containers, and jewellery, may be used as financial capitalfor sale, and may also confer social status. 24 Where ‘modern’ or non-pastoral physical assetssuch as mobile phones and radios are acquired by pastoralists, they are generally controlledby the men, as among other livelihood groups.Vulnerability ContextThe key shocks and trends affecting pastoral populations in Ethiopia impact differently onmen and women, and can also change gender roles and relations. One of the commonconsequences of drought (and climate change) is the migration and/or splitting of thepastoral household. If men move away with the livestock women have reduced access tolivestock products and may have to depend on firewood collection and other incomegeneration activities. They may also lose some of the social power that is mediated by theirmenfolk. Workloads increase for all, particularly women, as water, grazing and fuelwoodbecome more difficult to find. If the men migrate for wage labour as a drought strategy, thewomen are left with the extra burden of managing the stock, which may however increasetheir decision making power and social status, at least temporarily. Migration and separationcan also increase women’s personal vulnerability: with the absence of their male familymembers women are less protected and may be vulnerable to attack when they search forfirewood or water, or supervise livestock. In situations of conflict, this vulnerability is greatlyincreased. 4
    • Women are frequently marginalised in the process of commercialisation. It is generallyrecognised that women’s income generating activities are often taken over by their husbandsif they grow beyond a certain size – often when they shift from focusing onsubsistence/feeding the family to larger scale businesses. This may even apply to themarketing of livestock products such as milk, over which women have customary control. Insome pastoral areas in the Horn and East Africa the commercialisation of milk productionhas reduced this control and milk production and marketing has been taken over by menbecause the women lack the time, capacity, mobility or social authority to continue or expandtheir involvement, or their husbands become more interested as more income isgenerated. 25 In other cases men may object to their wives growing independence and try toprevent it. 26 Increasing market opportunities for livestock products therefore has the potentialto increase pastoral women’s economic status but does not necessarily mean that they willbe able to take advantage of these opportunities. Developing milk markets may alsonegatively affect nutrition levels in the household, and/or the productivity of the livestock, asmore milk is taken off for sale. 27On the other hand, in some of Ethiopia’s pastoral areas, increasing diversification isenhancing the economic status of some pastoral women and challenging the status of men:as livestock become less important to the household economy, particularly in peri-urbanand/or more sedentarised households, women engage in income generating activities (saleof firewood and handicrafts, petty trading etc.). In Somali and Afar Regions some pastoralmen see non-livestock productive activities as low status, preferring to chew khat and leavetheir wives to provide for the family 28while in Borana, women are increasingly involved inagriculture but without a corresponding increase in their control of the income derived fromcultivation. 29Sedentarisation, either as a result of diversification and/or impoverishment, is a growingtrend that can have both positive and negative impacts on pastoral women. While there aremore opportunities for income generation in urban and peri-urban settings (and in theory forenhancing human capital through improved access to health care and educationalopportunities), female-headed households in these settings may also suffer from a loss ofsocial status through a reduction in the influence they would wield as pastoral wives. Marriedwomen who settle near urban centres while their husbands remain mobile with the livestock(and usually another wife) may be able to make more of these economic and serviceopportunities whilst retaining social status as a married woman. A few women do succeed inestablishing businesses in livestock trade or other economic activities, but most tend toremain small scale because of the cultural and social limitations placed on women, and theprivate sector remains largely male-dominated, with few women entrepreneurs. 30Policies, Institutions and ProcessesIn spite of specific policy provisions for pastoral women (for example among the objectives ofthe National Action Plan for Gender Equality 31) there is a general recognition that muchgovernment and non-government development has failed pastoral women in the past interms of both their strategic and their practical needs, and that the greatest challengeremains with regard to implementing these objectives on the ground and increasing women’sawareness and knowledge of their rights and supporting policies.Indigenous institutions in Ethiopia’s pastoral areas, including women’s institutions, provide astatus and standing for pastoral women but at the same time many indigenous publicdecision making processes formally exclude women. Modern institutions such as local 5
    • government structures are similarly male dominated and often exclude women furtherbecause they ignore and consequently undermine the ‘informal power’ that women can exertthrough customary channels. Other aspects of indigenous pastoral culture continue to besanctioned by pastoral societies even though they affect women negatively, for exampleculturally accepted violence against women, such as FGM, marriage by abduction, earlymarriage, enforced cross-cousin marriage (in Afar), and widow ‘inheritance’. Many pastoralwomen remain ignorant of their rights under national law and lack the knowledge and/orcapacity to challenge these practices.Key Conclusions and Policy RecommendationsPastoral women in Ethiopia have different livelihood strategies and varying livelihood capitalassets according to their degree of sedentarisation. More mobile pastoral communities maybe seeking to enhance their pastoral livelihoods and to a certain extent to diversify them,while sedentary or semi-sedentary women in the peri-urban and urban areas (ex-pastoralists) are generally seeking alternatives to pastoral livelihoods, although some maymaintain linkages with the mobile livestock sector as well.Conclusions and Recommendations with regard to Mobile Pastoral WomenMany of the recommendations below are in line with the specific objectives of the NationalAction Plan for Gender Equality relating to pastoral women, but these plans have yet to beeffectively implemented and in general ignore the importance of recognising and building onpastoral women’s mobility in order to enhance their capital assets:• Pastoral women play an indispensable role in mobile pastoral economies, not only through their labour but also through their access to and degree of control over livestock and other pastoral financial capital. This contribution is rarely quantified, although it can be assumed that it makes up a significant part of the direct and indirect measurable contribution of pastoralism to the Ethiopian national economy valued at USD 1.6 billion. 32• In spite of this significant economic contribution by pastoral women, there is little support to mobile pastoral women’s financial capital in Ethiopia, such as the provision of micro- credit or support to markets. 33 Micro-credit has been successfully provided to semi- sedentary women’s groups in southern Ethiopia, as discussed below, but few schemes reach the more mobile women.• Initiatives to build pastoral women’s financial capital need to recognise that women’s and men’s livelihood strategies may vary according to their different livelihood goals and priorities. Women’s production objectives may focus on feeding the family, and hence aim to maximise milk offtake either for consumption or for sale, while men may aim to retain milk for livestock consumption in order to maximise herd productivity to increase livestock sales for cash. Similarly women may prioritise addressing livestock diseases that affect income (e.g. mastitis) while men may prioritise diseases with high mortality rates. 34  Improved markets and value chains for milk (and to a certain extent for other livestock products, and goods such as NTFPs) should be developed to enhance women’s incomes and financial capital.  However, three important caveats should be taken into account: first that increasing milk offtake (even if the proceeds are spent on grains) may have a negative effect on child nutrition, particularly in poorer families35; second, that milk offtake needs to be balanced against overall herd productivity; and third that increasing market opportunities does not automatically result in benefits for women if they do not have the social and financial capital to maximise them. 6
    •  Market development has historically focused on fixed access points: ‘in general, governments have attempted to adapt pastoralism to services rather than services to pastoralism’. 36 However, pastoral women may be best served by mobile rather than fixed markets. There already exist linkages between markets and mobile pastoralists – for example mobile livestock brokers or traders, and bush taxis that collect milk for transport to local towns. There is potential for these types of linkages to be enhanced to the benefit of mobile pastoral women and their marketing priorities. Sedentary peri-urban women’s groups could be connected with mobile pastoral women (either individuals or groups) for milk marketing, for example commissioning the bush taxis or using donkeys for transport. Collection points for milk marketing could be mobile rather than fixed; and training on basic hygiene (for example the use of aluminium cans instead of plastic containers) would extend the shelf life and quality of the milk and thus increase the price. 37  These and other initiatives to develop pastoral women’s financial assets should begin with the premise that support should be mobile and flexible, and also take into account the complex nature of livestock and other asset ownership in the pastoral sector.• Failure to recognise and build on women’s informal power, indigenous institutions and communication networks will further undermine them and erode women’s social capital. This capital is key to building up their other capital assets and enabling them to access services and other goods.  Collective action (creation of women’s groups etc.) can help to strengthen social capital, but where possible should build on existing networks and institutions rather than creating new institutional arrangements.  Raising awareness about women’s rights with regard to gender-based violence and harmful traditional practices (according to current national laws and policies) should use women’s networks and institutions, as well as involving men and their institutions.• There is an urgent need to build pastoral women’s human capital, with health and education as priorities, including basic adult literacy and numeracy.  For many pastoral women, mobile services are the only means whereby they will be able to improve their health and education status. Some Alternative Basic Education (ABE) schemes exist in pastoral areas of Ethiopia 38 but few are really mobile and move with the pastoralists themselves. 39 The children of mobile families thus have to choose between school and family/pastoral life; and mobile women are denied access to basic adult education.  Health and education services should build on pastoral women’s indigenous knowledge and skills, which are frequently overlooked and therefore undermined. In some areas women have already been trained as Community Health Workers40 and Traditional Birth Attendants, and in some cases as Community Animal Health Workers. 41 Given the cultural barriers to women attending health centres staffed by men, training female Community Health Workers presents a vital mobile option for improving pastoral women’s health.  The possibility of training women community workers in other sectors should also be promoted, in order to build on their skills, facilitate their access to other women, and enhance their social capital at the same time. 42• Although the PASDEP document appears broadly supportive of pastoralism as a livelihood strategy, the government’s implicit policy of sedentarisation will have significant implications for pastoral women and gender relations in the future. While sedentarisation offers potential opportunities for some women, the general trend in other pastoral areas is 7
    • that most women are further disadvantaged, both socially and financially, by a reduction in their mobility.• Specific changes in land policy (such as registration and/or enclosure) have significant impacts on women and their access to and control of natural capital.  Land registration in mobile pastoral areas must take account of women’s need to access and control natural resources and include women’s names on any title deeds.  The impact of any registration process should be carefully monitored, including learning lessons from existing registration schemes in sedentary agricultural areas.Conclusions and Recommendations with regard to Sedentary, Ex-pastoral Women• Building the financial capital of sedentary women requires less focus on livestock production and more on alternative livelihoods:  Opportunities for women to develop small businesses should be increased, for example for trade in milk, NTFPs, hides and skins, and livestock, as well as petty trade.  Micro-finance should be made available to support these businesses  Experience has shown that collective action provides women with more financial security as well as with social support. There are positive examples of sedentary and semi-sedentary women’s groups in southern Ethiopia establishing successful group or individual businesses and savings and credit schemes. 43• However, sedentary ex-pastoral women can have very low social capital which may limit the extent to which they can develop such businesses, particularly if they are heads of households and from the poorer wealth groups.  Interventions focusing on ex-pastoral women should ensure that female-headed households are included and are given the support needed to enable their full participation.  Increasing women’s skills and knowledge (for example basic literacy and numeracy, business skills) also helps to increase their confidence and enhances their social capital.• Although their human capital needs may not be as great as that of mobile pastoral women, ex-pastoral women remain severely disadvantaged in their access to health and education services.  Health and education services should continue to expand in pastoral areas, including in the urban centres to service the sedentary populations.  Affirmative action to overcome barriers to women’s and girls’ access and uptake of these services should be undertaken in terms of quotas and awareness raising.Women in pastoral areas in Ethiopia remain caught in a ‘double bind’: ‘as pastoralists, theyare victims of social, economic and political marginalization, and as women they sufferinequality in accessing resources, social services and participation in decision-making’. 44 Inorder to overcome this challenge, gender issues need to be mainstreamed at all stages ofpolicy development and implementation. The ‘twin-track’ approach to mainstreaminginvolves specific activities focusing on women’s needs (such as described in therecommendations above) together with gender analysis and awareness in all initiatives, notonly those relating to women. The capacity of policy makers, researchers and implementersto include detailed gender analysis of women’s livelihoods in their assessment, planning andimplementation should be enhanced, supported by appropriate gender disaggregated data.The opportunity for developing a national forum for women from pastoral areas should alsobe thoroughly investigated. 8
    • ReferencesAction Against Hunger (2005) Pioneering AAH programs in pastoral Ethiopia www.reliefweb.int/rwarchive/rwb.nsf/db900sid/ACIO-6C8HZP?OpenDocument&RSS20&RSS20=FS Accessed: 08.09.09Alemu, S.T. and F. Flintan (2007) ‘Dynamics of Rangeland and Water Management in Afar’ in: A. Ridgewell, G. Mamo and F. Flintan (eds.) (2007) Gender and Pastoralism Vol. 1: Rangeland and Resource Management in Ethiopia SOS Sahel Ethiopia, Addis AbabaCatley, A., G. Bekele, and A. Napier, (2008) Impact assessment of the Save the Children USA LEAP Health Program, Afdher and Dolobay Woredas, Somali Region, Ethiopia Feinstein International Center, Tufts University, Addis AbabaCEDAW (2002) Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under Article 18 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: Combined fourth and fifth periodic reports of States parties Ethiopia Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, United Nations, New YorkCoppock, D. L. (1994) The Borana Plateau of Southern Ethiopia: Synthesis of pastoral research, development and change, 1980-91 International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis AbabaCoppock, D.L., S. Desta, G. Gebru, A. Wako, I. Aden, C. Tadecha, and S. Tezera (2006) Collective Action by Women’s Groups to Combat Drought and Poverty in Northern Kenya Research Brief 06-01 Pastoral Risk Management Project (PARIMA), Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program, University of California – DavisCoppock, D.L., S. Desta, G. Gebru and S. Tezera (2007) Can Collective Action and Capacity Building Reduce Vulnerability Among Settled Pastoralists? Research Brief 07-08 Pastoral Risk Management Project (PARIMA), Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program, University of California – DavisDevereux, S. (2006) Vulnerable Livelihoods in Somali Region, Ethiopia Research Report 57, Institute of Development Studies, BrightonEmana, B., K. Gemtessa, W. Tiki, W. Rebu and L. Asfaw (undated) The Role of Indigenous Institutions in Pastoral Livelihood Strategies in Ethiopia Ethiopian Economic Association, Addis Ababa. www.eeaecon.org/Papers%20presented%20final/Bez...ral%20Livelihood%20Strategies%20in%20Ethiop ia-EEA.htm Accessed 24.08.09Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) (2006a) A Plan for Accelerated and Sustained Development to End Poverty (PASDEP): 2005/06-2009/10 Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, Addis AbabaFDRE (2006b) National Action Plan For Gender Equality (Nap-Ge) 2006-2010 Ministry of Women’s Affairs, Addis AbabaFDRE (2008a) Summary and Statistical Report of the 2007 Population and Housing Census: Population by Age and Sex Population Census Commission, Addis Ababa. Printed by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)FDRE (2008b) National Census, Section P: EducationFlintan, F. (2007) ‘A Sharing of Past Experiences’ in: Ridgewell and Flintan (eds.) (2007) Gender and Pastoralism Vol. 2: Livelihoods and Income Development in Ethiopia SOS Sahel Ethiopia, Addis AbabaFlintan, F. (2008) Women’s Empowerment in Pastoral Societies World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralism (WISP), IUCN, NairobiHatfield, R. and J. Davies (2006) Global Review of the Economics of Pastoralism World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralism (WISP), IUCN, NairobiHeffernan, C. (2002) Including Voices of the Poor DFID Animal Health Programme, Research Project R8213, Livestock Development Group, University of Reading www.dfid- ahp.org.uk/index.php?section=4&subsection=74 Accessed 29.04.09Holden, S. (2008) From Being Property of Men to Becoming Equal Owners? Early Impacts of Land Registration and Certification on Women in Southern Ethiopia Final Research Report prepared for UNHABITAT, Shelter Branch, Land Tenure and Property Administration SectionHundie, B. and M. Padmanabhan (2008) The Transformation of the Afar Commons in Ethiopia: State Coercion, Diversification, and Property Rights Change among Pastoralists Working Paper 87, CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi), Washington DCKipuri, N. and A. Ridgewell (2008) A Double Bind: The Exclusion of Pastoralist Women in the East and Horn of Africa Minority Rights Group International, LondonMamo, G. (2007) ‘“Community?” Forest Management in Borana’ in: A. Ridgewell, G. Mamo and F. Flintan (eds.) (2007) Gender and Pastoralism Vol.1: Rangeland and Resource Management in Ethiopia SOS Sahel Ethiopia, Addis Ababa 9
    • McPeak, J. and C. Doss (2006) Do Pastoral Husbands and Wives in Northern Kenya View Milk Markets Differently? Research Brief 06-02 Pastoral Risk Management Project (PARIMA), Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program, University of California – DavisOumer, A. and Z. Ali (2007) ‘Handicraft Production in Somali, Afar and South Omo’ in: Ridgewell and Flintan (eds.) (2007) Gender and Pastoralism Vol. 2: Livelihoods and Income Development in Ethiopia SOS Sahel Ethiopia, Addis AbabaOumer, S. (2007) ‘The Privatisation of Somali Region’s Rangelands’ in: A. Ridgewell, G. Mamo and F. Flintan (eds.) (2007) Gender and Pastoralism Vol.1: Rangeland and Resource Management in Ethiopia SOS Sahel Ethiopia, Addis AbabaPastoralist Communication Initiative (2007) Risk Taking for a Living: Trade and Marketing in the Somali Region of Ethiopia UN-OCHA, Addis AbabaPastoralist Concern Association Ethiopia (2006) On the Move: Understanding pastoralism in Ethiopia Addis AbabaPastoralist Consultants International (2009) Raising Voice, Securing a Livelihood: the role of diverse voices in developing secure livelihoods in pastoralist areas of Ethiopia – a summary paper by Mary Ann Brocklesby, Mary Hobley and Patta Scott-VilliersPastoralist Forum Ethiopia (2008) Promoting Gender Mainstreaming within Pastoral Programs and Organisations: A Generic Guideline in partnership with Oxfam GB, Addis AbabaPatterson, Kristen P. (2007) Integrating Population, Health and Environment in Ethiopia Population Reference Bureau, Washington DCSadler, K., C. Kerven, M. Calo, M. Manske, and A. Catley (2009) Milk Matters: A literature review of pastoralist nutrition and programming responses Feinstein International Center, Tufts University and Save the Children, Addis AbabaSave the Children USA (2007) Pastoralist Review: Save the Children USA’s work in the pastoral areas of southern Ethiopia Save the Children USA and USAID, Addis AbabaSOS Sahel Ethiopia (2009) Pastoralism in Ethiopia: Its Total Economic Values and Development Challenges Study commissioned by the World Initiative for Sustainable PastoralismUNICEF (2009) Info by Country www.unicef.org/infobycountry/ethiopia_statistics.html#0 Accessed: 08.09.09United Nations Development Program (2008) Human Development Report 2007/2008: Statistical UpdateWatson, C. (1988) The Development Needs of Turkana Women A report for Oxfam GB and the Public Law Institute, NairobiWatson, C. (1989) The Consequences of the 1980-81 Famine (lopiar) on the Domestic Roles of Women in Northern Turkana, Kenya Master’s Thesis, Department of Social Anthropology, University of ManchesterWatson, C. (2003) Pastoral Women as Peacemakers: Consultancy Report Community Based Animal Health and Participatory Epidemiology (CAPE) Unit, African Union/Interafrican Bureau for Animal Resources (AU/IBAR), NairobiWayua, F., M. Shibia, M. Mamo, D. Bailey and D.L. Coppock (2008) What are consumers in Moyale, Kenya, willing to pay for improved milk quality? Research Brief 08-01 Pastoral Risk Management Project (PARIMA), Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program, University of California – DavisWomenWatch (undated) ‘Ethiopia National Action Plan’ www.un.org/womenwatch/confer/beijing/national/ethiopia.htm Accessed: 08.09.09World Bank (2009) Ethiopia Summary Gender Profile www.worldbank.org Accessed 29.08.09 10
    • Notes1 FDRE 2006a; FDRE 2006b2 Including the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), the African Union’s Declaration onGender Equality in Africa, and the Millennium Development Goals.3 Box 1 data sources: UNDP 2008; Patterson 2007; FDRE 2006a; WomenWatch (undated); FDRE 2008b; FDRE 2006b; World Bank 2009;Pastoralist Consultant International 2009; UNICEF 20094 CEDAW 2002; FDRE 2006b5 Hundie and Padmanabhan 20086 Emana et al undated7 Coppock 19948 McPeak and Doss 20069 Kipuri and Ridgewell 2008, Watson 198910 The market for handicrafts is largely limited to those areas such as South Omo which are frequented by tourists, together with limitedopportunities afforded by traders supplying shops in Addis Ababa. South Omo received over 200,000 tourists in 2005/6 (Oumer and Ali2007)11 Flintan 200712 Box 2 data sources: Catley et al. 2008; Devereux 2006; Kipuri and Ridgewell 2008; FDRE 2008a; FDRE 2006b; Sadler et al. 2009;Pastoralist Forum Ethiopia 2008; Ridgewell et al 2007; Mamo 200713 Watson 1988; Watson 1989; Kipuri and Ridgewell 2008; Pastoralist Consultants International 2009; Hatfield and Davies 200614 Source: Watson 200315 Hatfield and Davies 2006; Kipuri and Ridgewell 2008. Examples include Alokita in the Karimojong Cluster (Watson 2003), Ischar inSomali (Devereux 2006) and Siiqee in Borana (Pastoralist Forum Ethiopia 2008)16 Pastoralist Consultants International 200917 Devereux 200618 Kipuri and Ridgewell 200819 Devereux 200620 Oumer 200721 Oumer 200722 Flintan 200723 Holden 200824 Flintan 200825 Kipuri and Ridgewell 200826 McPeak and Doss 2006. In this study in northern Kenya, reasons for the men’s reluctance to support their wives’ milk marketingincluded: the desire to preserve more milk for the livestock; concern about women’s control of the income from the milk sales, which isgenerally spent in the town on the same day; and fear that the women will develop relationships with men in the town.27 Sadler et al. 200928 Kipuri and Ridgewell 2008; Devereux 2006; Alemu and Flintan 200729 Mamo 2007 11
    • 30 Pastoralist Communication Initiative 200731 The Nap-Ge objectives include increasing pastoral women’s access to and control over resources, special service packages for pastoralwomen (extension, education, health, credit etc.) and projects to reduce pastoral women’s workload (FDRE 2006b)32 ‘Direct’ contributions of the Total Economic Valuation (TEV) include sales of livestock and livestock products and the subsistence valueof livestock products. ‘Indirect’ contributions include inputs to agriculture and tourism, and dryland products. Direct and indirectcontributions that cannot be measured and therefore are excluded from this calculation include employment, animal management andrangeland management skills, environmental protection, socio-cultural values and indigenous knowledge (SOS Ethiopia 209)33 Adrian Cullis, pers.com.34 Heffernan 200235 Sadler et al. 200936 Kipuri and Ridgewell 200837 Wayua et al. 200838 Save the Children 2007; Pastoralist Concern Association Ethiopia 200639 Adrian Cullis, pers. com.40 The WHO has recently ratified the dispensing of antibiotics to treat childhood pneumonia (a key contributor to child morbidity) bycommunity health workers. However the Ethiopian Government is currently reluctant to authorise community workers to dispenseantibiotics (Kate Sadler, pers.com.). Lessons from the change in policy towards Community Animal Health Workers may perhaps beapplied here to bring about a similar policy change with regard to human health and facilitate an expansion of the role of (particularlywomen) community health workers.41 Action Against Hunger 200542 For example, women paralegals have been trained with some success in some pastoral communities in West Africa (Flintan 2008)43 Coppock et al. 2006; Coppock et al. 200744 Kipuri and Ridgewell 2008 12