Soft Decision Decoding Algorithms of Reed-Solomon Codes

  • 1,215 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,215
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
36
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • Title
  • Most of the algebraic hard decision decoders are of similar complexity, which is about o(d^2)
  • Recording channels are the most important application, perhaps!
  • Two forms of representations are equivalent!
  • Basic properties
  • The motivation of an efficient SISO decoder for RS codes
  • outline
  • Generalized Minimum Distance (GMD) Decoding (Forney 1966) Chase decoding (Chase 1972) Related works
  • Algebraic beyond half dmin decoding, which is the kernel of KV algorithm
  • Outline: 1) curve fitting! 2) multiplicity assignment, let (x,y) pass through (alpha, beta) m times 3) the larger the m, the larger the decoding radius 4) when beta fails in the decoding radius, (y-f(x)) can factorize Q(x,y) 5) smart way to construct Q(x,y) and factorize it 6) when soft information is available, can do weighted multiplicity assignment
  • KV 1) proportional assignment 2) asymptotically optimal
  • KV 1) performance analysis becomes interesting 2) no longer a fixed radius 3) sufficient condition
  • KV 1) failure is interesting, can we do better?
  • KV 1) failure is interesting, can we do better?
  • Life becomes much easier when we go to bit level
  • When turbo code comes, people realize convolutional codes are inherently bad codes, but how about algebraic codes?
  • Asymptotically be optimal, but practically suffer a loss!
  • More significant difference
  • Motivation for bit level decomposition
  • Maximum-likelihood SISO decoding and variations Trellis based decoding using the binary image expansions of RS codes over GF(2 m ) (Vardy & Be’ery 1991) Reduced complexity version (Ponnampalam & Vucetic 2002) SISO (Ponnampalam & Grant 2003)
  • 1) BCH subcode and glue vectors 2) Useful to construct sparse parity check matrices for short codes
  • Efficient for general linear block codes
  • The nice property of ldpc codes is that the parity check matrix is sparse, thus, the probability that two erased bits participate in another check diminishes.
  • Even in the optimistic case, erasure channel, it won’t give good results.
  • It is impossible to have a sparse representation of RS codes
  • Iterative decoding for general linear block codes (tough problem!)
  • Since the parity check matrix is of full rank, we are guaranteed to get (n-k) LRB
  • Define syndrome as binary summation of all participating bits Define the soft syndrome product of the channel reliabilities J is minimized iff the decoding converges to a valid codeword
  • A variation of standard gradient descent
  • Think about erasure channel. This does happen! J is not minimized but we get zero gradient!
  • Not going deep to details!
  • KV 0.65dB BMA 1dB With extreme huge complexity, we gain 1.6dB gain at FER = 10^-4.
  • In practice, there is a huge difference!
  • Case study!
  • Coding gain may shrink in practical systems
  • No really successful bit level soft decoder which can handle long constraint length codes
  • Acknowledgements

Transcript

  • 1. Soft Decision Decoding Algorithms ofReed-Solomon CodesSarbjeet SinghNITTTRSector 26 CHD
  • 2. Historical Review of Reed Solomon CodesDate of birth: 40 years ago (Reed and Solomon 1960)Related to non-binary BCH codes (Gorenstein and Zierler 1961)Efficient decoder: not until 6 years later (Berlekamp 1967)Linear feedback shift register (LFSR) interpretation (Massey 1969)Other algebraic hard decision decoder:Euclid’s Algorithm (Sugiyama et al. 1975)Frequency-domain decoding (Gore 1973 and Blahut 1979)
  • 3. Wide Range of Applications of Reed Solomon CodesNASA Deep Space: CC + RS(255, 223, 32)Multimedia Storage:CD: RS(32, 28, 4), RS(28, 24, 4) with interleavingDVD: RS(208, 192, 16), RS(182, 172, 10) product codeDigitial Video Broadcasting: DVB-T CC + RS(204, 188)Magnetic Recording: RS(255,239) etc. (nested RS code)
  • 4. Basic Properties of Reed Solomon Codes∏−+=−==12)()(where,)()()(:formpolynomialGenerator(2)tbbiixxgxmxgxc α=−+−−+−)12)(1(12)1(11:matrixcheckparityThetbNtbbNbHαααα1Nwhere),(overdefinedK)RS(N, −= mmqqGF))(),...,(),((),...,,()(:formevaluationPolynomial(1) 11021 −== NN fffxxxxc ααα1110 ...)(where −−+++= KK xfxffxf)(inelementsnonzerodistinctares mi qGFα
  • 5. Properties of BM algorithm:Decoding region:Decoding complexity: UsuallyBasic Properties of Reed Solomon Codes (cont’d)min2 dfe <+Properties of RS code:Symbol level cyclic (nonbinary BCH codes)Maximum distance separable (symbol level): 112min +−=+= KNtd)( 2No2mind∝
  • 6. Motivation for RS Soft Decision DecoderHard decision decoder does not fully exploit the decoding capabilityEfficient soft decision decoding of RS codes remains an open problemRS Coded Turbo Equalization System-+a prioriextrinsicinterleavinga prioriextrinsicΠΣsourceRS EncoderinterleavingPR Encodersinkhard decision+AWGN+RSDecoderChannelEqualizerde-interleavingΠ1Π−ΣSoft input soft output (SISO) algorithm is favorable
  • 7. Presentation OutlineIterative decoding for RS codesSymbol-level algebraic soft decision decodingSimulation resultsBinary expansion of RS codes and soft decoding algorithmsApplications and future works
  • 8. Symbol-level Algebraic Soft Decision Decoding
  • 9. Reliability Assisted Hard Decision DecodingGeneralized Minimum Distance (GMD) Decoding (Forney 1966):New distance measure: generalized minimum distanceSuccessively erase the least reliable symbols and run the hard decision decoderGMD is shown to be asymptotically optimalChase Type-II decoding (Chase 1972):Exhaustively flip the least reliable symbols and run the hard decision decoderChase algorithm is also shown to be asymptotically optimalRelated works:Fast GMD (Koetter 1996)Efficient Chase (Kamiya 2001)Combined Chase and GMD for RS codes (Tang et al. 2001)Performance analysis of these algorithms for RS codes seems still open
  • 10. Bounded distance + 1 decoding (Berlekamp 1996)Beyond decoding for low rate RS codes (Sudan 1997)Decoding up errors (Guruswami and Sudan 1999)A good tutorial paper (JPL Report, McEliece 2003)Algebraic Beyond Half dmin List Decoding2/mind NKN −
  • 11. Outline of Algebraic Beyond Half Distance DecodingComplexity:Interpolation (Koetter’s fast algorithm):Factorization (Roth and Ruckenstein’s algorithm):)( 42mNO)(NKOFactorization Step:generate a list of y-roots, i.e.:Pick up the most likely codeword from the list L}))(deg(),,(|))((:][)({ KxfyxQxfyxFxfL <−∈=)(ˆ xfDecoding:Basic idea: find f(x), which fits as many points in pairs))(),...,(),((:codeworddTransmitte 21 Nfff ααα),...,,(:vectorReceived 21 Nβββ)),(( iif βα),( yxQInterpolation Step:Construct a bivariate polynomial of minimum (1,K-1) degree,which has a zero of order at , i.e.:m Nlll ,...,1),,( =βαmjiyxQ ll =+−− thanlessdegreeoftermnoinvolves),(if βα
  • 12. Algebraic Soft Interpolation Based List DecodingKoetter and Vardy algorithm (Koetter & Vardy 2003)Based on the Guruswami and Sudan’s algebraic list decodingUse the reliability information to assign multiplicitiesKV is optimal in multiplicity assignment for long RS codesReduced complexity KV (Gross et al. submitted 2003)Re-encoding technique: largely reduce the cost for high rate codesVLSI architecture (Ahmed et al. submitted 2003)
  • 13. Basic idea: interpolating more symbols using the soft informationThe interpolation and factorization is the same as GS algorithmSufficient condition for successful decoding:The complexity increases with , maximum number of multiplicitySoft Interpolation Based Decoding)()1(2)( MCKcSM −≥Definition:Reliability matrix:Multiplicity matrix:Score:Cost:cMcSM ,)( =∑∑= = +=qinjjimMC1 1,21)(Nq×Π)(Π= gM2)(MC
  • 14. Recent Works and RemarksThe ultimate gain of algebraic soft decoding (ASD) over AWGNchannel is about 1dBComplexity is scalable but prohibitively huge for large multiplicityThe failure pattern of ASD algorithm and optimal multiplicityassignment scheme is of interestRecent works on performance analysis and multiplicity assignment:Gaussian approximation (Parvaresh and Vardy 2003)Exponential bound (Ratnakar and Koetter 2004)Chernoff bound (El-Khamy and McEliece 2004)Performance analysis over BEC and BSC (Jiang and Narayanan 2005)
  • 15. Performance Analysis of ASD over Discrete Alphabet ChannelsPerformance Analysis over BEC and BSC (Jiang andNarayanan, accepted by ISIT2005)The analysis gives some intuition about the decoding radius of ASDWe investigate the bit-level decoding radius for high rate codesFor BEC, bit-level radius is twice as large as that of the BM algorithmFor BSC, bit-level radius is slightly larger than that of the BM algorithmIn conclusion, ASD is limited by its algebraic engine
  • 16. Binary Image Expansion of RSCodes and Soft Decision Decoding
  • 17. Binary Image Expansion of RS Codes over GF(2m)bmxGFx torbinary vecdim-manasexpressedbecan)2(known thatisIt ∈∀],...,,[ 1101 −× = NN cccC ],...,,,...,,...,,[ )1(1)1(1)0(1)1(0)1(0)0(0)1(−−−−−×= mNNNmNmb ccccccCKm)(Nm,RSexpansionbinaryahas)2(overcodeK)RS(N,ly,Consequent bmGF=−−−−−−−×−NKNKNKNNNKNHHHHHHH),1(1),1(0),1(1,01,00,0)(=−−−−−−−−×−1,1)(1,1)(0,1)(1,01,00,0)(NmmKNmKNmKNNmNmmKNbhhhhhhH
  • 18. Bit-level Weight Enumerator“The major drawback with RS codes (for satellite use) is that the presentgeneration of decoders do not make full use of bit-based soft decisioninformation” (Berlekamp)How does the binary expansion of RS codes perform under ML decoding?Performance analysis using its weight enumeratorAveraged ensemble weight enumerator of RS codes (Retter 1991)It gives some idea about how RS codes perform under ML decoding
  • 19. Performance Comparison of RS(255,239)
  • 20. Performance Comparison of RS(255,127)
  • 21. RemarksRS codes themselves are good codeHowever, ML decoding is NP-hard (Guruswami and Vardy 2004)Are there sub-optimal decoding algorithms using the binary expansions?
  • 22. Trellis based Decoding using BCH Subcode ExpansionMaximum-likelihood decoding and variations:Partition RS codes into BCH subcodes and glue vectors (Vardy and Be’ery 1991)Reduced complexity version (Ponnampalam and Vucetic 2002)Soft input soft output version (Ponnampalam and Grant 2003)
  • 23. Subfield Subcode DecompositionRemarks:Decomposition greatly reduces the trellis size for short codesImpractical for long codes, since the size of the glue vectors is very largeRelated work:Construct sparse representation for iterative decoding (Milenkovic and Vasic2004)Subspace subcode of Reed Solomon codes (Hattori et al. 1998)BCH subcodesGlue vector=4321000000000000~gluegluegluegluebGGGGBBBBG
  • 24. Reliability based Ordered Statistic DecodingReliability based decoding:Ordered Statistic Decoding (OSD) (Fossorier and Lin 1995)Box and Match Algorithm (BMA) (Valembois and Fossorier 2004)Ordered Statistic Decoding using preprocessing (Wu et al. 2004)Basic ideas:Order the received bits according to their reliabilitiesPropose hard decision reprocessing based on the most reliable basis (MRB)Remarks:The reliability based scheme is efficient for short to medium length codesThe complexity increases exponentially with the reprocessing orderBMA algorithm trade memory for time complexity
  • 25. Iterative Decoding Algorithms for RS Codes
  • 26. How does the panacea of modern communication, iterativedecoding algorithm work for RS codes?Note that all the codes in the literature, for which we can usesoft decoding algorithms are sparse graph codes with smallconstraint length.A Quick Question
  • 27. How does standard message passing algorithm work?bit nodes…………. ………... . . . . . . . . …………….check nodes…………….erased bits? If two or more of the incoming messages are erasures the check is erasedFor the AWGN channel, two or more unreliable messages invalidate the check
  • 28. A Few Unreliable Bits “Saturate” the Non-sparse Parity Check Matrix[ ]000000000000000000000=bcIterative decoding is stuck due to only a few unreliable bits“saturating” the whole non-sparse parity check matrix=011110010001111101100001111101100011110010111101100011110010001001011111110101010100100001011111110101010011111110101010100001bHBinary image expansion of the parity check matrix of RS(7, 5) over GF(23)Consider RS(7, 5) over GF(23) :[ ]1.15.01.08.02.09.06.01.02.09.05.01.03.04.08.01.10.17.06.19.08.0 −−−−−=r
  • 29. Sparse Parity Check Matrices for RS Codes Can we find an equivalent binary parity check matrix that is sparse? For RS codes, this is not possible! The H matrix is the G matrix of the dual code The dual of an RS code is also an MDS Code Each row has weight at least (K+1)Typically, the row weight is much higher
  • 30. Iterative Decoding for RS CodesRecent progress on RS codes:Sub-trellis based iterative decoding (Ungerboeck 2003)Stochastic shifting based iterative decoding (Jiang and Narayanan,2004)Sparse representation of RS codes using GFFT (Yedidia, 2004)Iterative decoding for general linear block codes:Iterative decoding for general linear block codes (Hagenauer et al.1996)APP decoding using minimum weight parity checks (Lucas et al. 1998)Generalized belief propagation (Yedidia et al. 2000)
  • 31. Recent Iterative TechniquesSub-trellis based iterative decoding (Ungerboeck 2003)Self concatenation using sub-trellis constructed from the parity check matrix:Remarks:Performance deteriorates due to large number of short cyclesWork for short codes with small minimum distances=011110010001111101100001111101100011110010111101100011110010001001011111110101010100100001011111110101010011111110101010100001bHBinary image expansion of the parity check matrix of RS(7, 5) over GF(23)
  • 32. Recent Iterative Techniques (cont’d) Stochastic shifting based iterative decoding (Jiang and Narayanan, 2004) Due to the irregularity in the H matrix, iterative decoding favors some bits Taking advantage of the cyclic structure of RS codes],,,,,,[ 4321065 rrrrrrr ],,,,,,[ 6543210 rrrrrrr Stochastic shift prevent iterative procedure from getting stuckBest result: RS(63,55) about 0.5dB gain from HDD However, for long codes, the performance deterioratesShift by 2=101100101100110001111H
  • 33. Proposed Iterative Decoding for RS Codes
  • 34. Iterative Decoding Based on Adaptive Parity Check Matrixtransmitted codeword [ ]0011010=cIdea: reduce the sub-matrix corresponding to unreliable bits to asparse nature using Gaussian eliminationFor example, consider (7,4) Hamming code:parity check matrix=101011011001011101010H=101100101100110001111H=101100101100110001111HWe can make the (n-k) less reliable positions sparse!received vector [ ]1.01.02.14.11.06.01.1 −−−−−−=r
  • 35. Adaptive Decoding Procedurebit nodes…………. ………... . . . . . . . . …………….check nodes…………….unreliable bitsAfter the adaptive update, iterative decoding can proceed
  • 36. Gradient Descent and Adaptive Potential FunctionThe decoding problem is relaxed as minimizing J using gradientdescent with the initial value T observed from the channelJ is also a function of H. It is adapted such that unreliable bits areseparated in order to avoid getting stuck at zero gradient points: ),( )0(THH ψ←Geometric interpretation (suggested by Ralf Koetter)Define the tanh domain transform as:The syndrome of a parity check can be expressed as:Define the soft syndrome as:Define the cost function as:∑⊕==1ijHji rs∏∏ ====11)(ijij HjHji LTS ν∑−=−=kniiSTHJ1),()2/tanh()( jjj LLT ==ν
  • 37. Two Stage Optimization ProcedureProposed algorithm is a generalization of the iterative decoding schemeproposed by Lucas et al. (1998), two-stage optimization procedure:The damping coefficient serves to control the convergent dynamics)))(()((1 },1|{)(1)(1)1(∑ ∏−= ≠=∈−−++←kni mjHjjtmtmtmijTTT νανν),( )()0()( ttTHH ψ←
  • 38. Avoid Zero Gradient PointAdaptive schemechanges the gradientand prevents itgetting stuck at zerogradient pointsZero gradientpoint
  • 39. Variations of the Generic AlgorithmConnect unreliable bits as deg-2Incorporate this algorithm with hard decision decoderAdapting the parity check matrix at symbol levelExchange bits in reliable and unreliable part. Run the decoder multiple timesReduced complexity partial updating scheme
  • 40. Simulation Results
  • 41. AWGN Channels
  • 42. AWGN Channels (cont’d)Asymptotic performanceis consistent with the MLupper-bound.
  • 43. AWGN Channels (cont’d)
  • 44. AWGN Channels (cont’d)
  • 45. Interleaved Slow Fading Channel
  • 46. Fully Interleaved Slow Fading Channels
  • 47. Fully Interleaved Slow Fading Channels (cont.)
  • 48. Turbo Equalization Systems
  • 49. Embed the Proposed Algorithm in the Turbo Equalization SystemRS Coded Turbo Equalization System-+a prioriextrinsicinterleavinga prioriextrinsicΠΣsourceRS EncoderinterleavingPR Encodersinkhard decision+AWGN+RSDecoderBCJREqualizerde-interleavingΠ1Π−Σ
  • 50. Turbo Equalization over EPR4 Channels
  • 51. Turbo Equalization over EPR4 Channels
  • 52. RS Coded Modulation
  • 53. RS Coded Modulation over Fast Rayleigh Fading Channels
  • 54. Applications and Future Works
  • 55. Potential Problems in ApplicationsRespective problems for various decoding schemes:Reliability assisted HDD: Gain is marginal in practical SNRsAlgebraic soft decoding: performance is limited by the algebraic natureReliability based decoding: huge memory, not scalable with SNRSub-code decomposition: only possible for very short codesIterative decoding: adapting Hb at each iteration is a huge costGeneral Problems:Coding gain may shrink down in practical systemsConcatenated with CC: difficult to generate the soft informationPerformance in the practical SNRs should be analyzed“In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.But, in practice, there is…” (Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut)
  • 56. A Case Study (System Setups)Forward Error Control of a Digital Television Transmission Standard:Modulation format: 64 or 16 QAM modulation (semi-set partitioning mapping)Inner code: convolutional code rate=2/3 or 8/9Bit-interleaved coded modulation (BICM)Iterative demodulation and decoding (BICM-ID)The decoded bytes from inner decoder are interleaved and fed to outer decoderOuter code: RS(208,188) using hard decision decodingWill soft decoding algorithm significantly improve the overall performance?
  • 57. A Case Study (Simulation Results)
  • 58. Future WorksHow to incorporate the proposed ADP with other soft decodingschemes?Taking advantage of the inherent structure of RS codes at bit levelMore powerful decoding tool, e.g., trellisExtend the idea of adaptive algorithms to demodulation and equalizationApply the ADP algorithm to quantization or to solve K-SAT problems
  • 59. Thank you!