Harnessing Hadoop: Understanding the Big Data Processing Options for Optimizing Analytical Workloads
 

Harnessing Hadoop: Understanding the Big Data Processing Options for Optimizing Analytical Workloads

on

  • 4,636 views

A guide to using Apache Hadoop as your open source big data platform of choice, including the vendors that make various Hadoop flavors, related open source tools, Hadoop capabilities and suitable ...

A guide to using Apache Hadoop as your open source big data platform of choice, including the vendors that make various Hadoop flavors, related open source tools, Hadoop capabilities and suitable applications.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
4,636
Views on SlideShare
4,484
Embed Views
152

Actions

Likes
2
Downloads
75
Comments
0

4 Embeds 152

https://twitter.com 84
http://www.linkedin.com 49
http://www.scoop.it 17
https://www.linkedin.com 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Harnessing Hadoop: Understanding the Big Data Processing Options for Optimizing Analytical Workloads Harnessing Hadoop: Understanding the Big Data Processing Options for Optimizing Analytical Workloads Document Transcript

    • • Cognizant 20-20 Insights Harnessing Hadoop: Understanding the Big Data Processing Options for Optimizing Analytical Workloads As Hadoop’s ecosystem evolves, new open source tools and capabilities are emerging that can help IT leaders build more capable and businessrelevant big data analytics environments. Executive Summary Asserting that data is vital to business is an understatement. Organizations have generated more and more data for years, but struggle to use it effectively. Clearly data has more important uses than ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. In addition, data is being generated with greater velocity, due to the advent of new pervasive devices (e.g., smartphones, tablets, etc.), social Web sites (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.) and other sources like GPS, Google Maps, heat/pressure sensors, etc. Moreover, a plethora of bits and bytes is being created by data warehouses, repositories, backups and archives. IT leaders need to work with the lines of business to take advantage of the wealth of insight that can be mined from these repositories. This search for data patterns will be similar to the searches the oil and gas industry conduct for precious resources. Similar business value can be uncovered if organizations can improve how “dirty” data is processed to refine key business decisions. cognizant 20-20 insights | november 2013 According to IDC1 and Century Link,2 our planet now has 2.75 zettabytes (ZB) worth of data; this number is likely to reach 8ZB by 2015. This situation has given rise to the new buzzword known as “big data.” Today, many organizations are applying big data analytics to challenges such as fraud detection, risk/threat analysis, sentiment analysis, equities analysis, weather forecasting, product recommendations, classifications, etc. All of these activities require a platform that can process this data and deliver useful (often predictive) insights. This white paper discusses how to leverage a big data analytics platform, dissecting its capabilities, limitations and vendor choices. Big Data’s Ground Zero Apache Hadoop3 is a Java-based open source platform that makes processing of large data possible over thousands of distributed nodes. Hadoop’s development resulted from publication of two Google authored whitepapers (i.e., Google File System and Google MapReduce). There are numerous vendor-specific distributions available
    • Hadoop Base Components MapReduce (Distributed Programming Framework) HDFS (Hadoop Distributed File System) Figure 1 based on Apache Hadoop, from companies such as Cloudera (CDH3/4), Hortonworks (1.x/2.x) and MapR (M3/M5). In addition, appliance-based solutions are offered by many vendors, such as IBM, EMC, Oracle, etc. Figure 1 illustrates Apache Hadoop’s two base components. Hadoop distributed file system (HDFS) is a base component of the Hadoop framework that manages the data storage. It stores data in the form of data blocks (default size: 64MB) on the local hard disk. The input data size defines the block size to be used in the cluster. A block size of 128MB for a large file set is a good choice. Keeping large block sizes means a small number of blocks can be stored, thereby minimizing the memory requirement on the master node (commonly known as NameNode) for storing the metadata information. Block size also impacts the job execution time, and thereby cluster performance. A file can be stored in HDFS with a different block size during the upload process. For file sizes smaller than the block size, the Hadoop cluster may not perform optimally. Example: A file size of 512MB requires eight blocks (default: 64MB), so it will need memory to store information of 25 items (1 filename + 8 * 3 copies). The same file with a block size of 128MB will require memory for just 13 items. HDFS has built-in fault tolerance capability, thereby eliminating the need for setting up a redundant array of inexpensive disks (RAID) on the data nodes. The data blocks stored in HDFS automatically get replicated across multiple data nodes based on the replication factor (default: 3). The replication factor determines the number of cognizant 20-20 insights copies of a data block to be created and distributed across other data nodes. The larger the replication factor, the better the read performance of the cluster. On the other hand, it requires more time to replicate the data blocks and more storage for replicated copies. For example, storing a file size of 1GB requires around 4GB of storage space, due to a replication factor of 3 and an additional 20% to 30% of space required during data processing. Both block size and replication factor impact Hadoop cluster performance. The value for both the parameters depends on the input data type and the application workload to run on this cluster. In a development environment, the replication factor can be set to a smaller number — say, 1 or 2 — but it is advisable to set this value to a higher factor, if the data available on the cluster is crucial. Keeping a default replication factor of 3 is a good choice from a data redundancy and cluster performance perspective. Figure 2 (next page) depicts the NameNode and DataNode that constitute the HDFS service. MapReduce is the second base component of a Hadoop framework. It manages the data processing part on the Hadoop cluster. A cluster runs MapReduce jobs written in Java or any other language (Python, Ruby, R, etc.) via streaming. A single job may consist of multiple tasks. The number of tasks that can run on a data node is governed by the amount of memory installed. It is recommended to have more memory installed on each data node for better cluster performance. Based on the application workload that is going to run on the cluster, a data node may require high compute power, high disk I/O or additional memory. 2
    • Hadoop Services Schematic MapReduce (Processing) Job Tracker Name Node Task Tracker Task Tracker Data Node Data Node ... . ... . Task Tracker Data Node Secondary Name Node HDFS (Storage) Figure 2 The job execution process is handled by the JobTracker and TaskTracker services (see HDFS – Hadoop Figure 2). The typeDistributed File System of job scheduler chosen for a cluster depends on the application workload. If the cluster will be running short running jobs, then FIFO scheduler will serve the purpose. For a much more balanced cluster, one can choose to use Fair Scheduler. In MRv1.0, there’s no high availability (HA) for the JobTracker service. If the node running JobTracker service fails, all jobs submitted in the cluster will be discontinued and must be resubmitted once the node is recovered or another node is made available. This issue has been fixed in the newer release — i.e., MRv2.0, also known as yet another resource negotiator (YARN).4 • Pig provides a high-level procedural language known as PigLatin. Programs written in PigLatin are automatically converted into map-reduce jobs. This is very suitable in situations where developers are not familiar with high-level languages such as Java, but have strong scripting knowledge and expertise. They can create their own customized functions. It is predominantly recommended for processing large amounts of semi-structured data. • Hive provides a SQL-like language known as HiveQL (query language). Analysts can run queries against the data stored in HDFS using SQL-like queries that automatically get converted into map-reduce jobs. It is recommended where we have large amounts of unstructured data and we want to fetch particular details without writing map-reduce jobs. Companies like RevolutionAnalytics6 can leverage Hadoop clusters running Hive via RHadoop connectors. RHadoop provides a connector for HDFS, MapReduce and HBase connectivity. Figure 2 also depicts the interaction among these five service components. The Secondary Name Node plays the vital role of check-pointing. It is this node that off-loads the work of metadata image creation and updating on a regular basis. It is recommended to keep the machine configuration the same as Name Node so that in the case of an emergency this node can be promoted as a Name Node. • HBase is a type of NOSQL database and offers scalable and distributed database service. However, it is not optimized for transactional applications and relational analytics. Be aware: HBase is not a replacement for a relational database. A cluster with HBase installed requires an additional 24GB to 32GB of memory on each data node. It is recommended that the data nodes running HBase Region Server should run a smaller number of MapReduce tasks. The Hadoop Ecosystem Hadoop base components are surrounded by numerous ecosystem5 projects. Many of them are already top-level Apache (open source) projects; some, however, remain in the incubation stage. Figure 3 (next page) highlights a few of the ecosystem components. The most common ones include: cognizant 20-20 insights 3
    • Avro (Serialization) Ambari (System Management) (Coordination) Zookeeper Sqoop (CLI for Data Movement) MapReduce (Distributed Programming Framework) HBase (SQL) (NoSQL Store) Hive HCatalog Hadoop Ecosystem Pig (Data Flow) (Table/Schema Mgmt.) Scanning the Hadoop Project Ecosystem HDFS Infrastructure Layer OS Layer (Hadoop Distributed File System) Physical Machines Virtual Machines Storage Network Figure 3 Hadoop clusters are mainly used in R&D-related activities. Many enterprises are now using Hadoop with production workloads. The type of ecosystem components required depends upon the enterprise needs. Enterprises with large data warehouses normally go for production-ready tools from proven vendors such as IBM, Oracle, EMC, etc. Also, not every enterprise requires a Hadoop cluster. A cluster is mainly required by business units that are developing Hadoopbased solutions or running analytics workloads. Business units that are just entering into analytics may start small by building a 5-10 node cluster. As shown in Figure 4 (next page), a Hadoop cluster can scale from just a few data nodes to thousands of data nodes as the need arises or data grows. Hadoop clusters show linear scalability, both in terms of performance and storage capacity, as the count of nodes increase. Apache Hadoop runs primarily on the Intel x86/x86_64based architecture. Clusters must be designed with a particular workload in mind (e.g., data-intensive loads, processor-intensive loads, mixed loads, real-time clusters, etc.). As there are many Hadoop distributions available, implementation selection depends upon feature availability, licensing cost, cognizant 20-20 insights performance reports, hardware requirements, skills availability within the enterprise and the workload requirements. Per a comStore report,7 MapR performs better than Cloudera and works out to be less costly. Hortonworks, on the other hand, has a strong relationship with Microsoft. Its distribution is also available for a Microsoft platform (HDP v1.3 for Windows), which makes this distribution popular among the Microsoft community. Hadoop Appliance An alternate approach to building a Hadoop cluster is to use a Hadoop appliance. These are customizable and ready-to-use complete stacks from vendors such as IBM (IBM Netezza), Oracle (Big Data Appliance), EMC (Data Computing Appliance), HP (AppSystem), Teradata Aster, etc. Using an appliance-based approach speeds goto-market and results in an integrated solution from a single (and accountable) vendor like IBM, Teradata, HP, Oracle, etc. These appliances come in different sizes and configurations. Every vendor uses a different Hadoop distribution. For example: Oracle Big Data is based on a Cloudera distribution; EMC uses MapR and HP AppSystem can be configured with Cloudera, 4
    • Hadoop Cluster: An Anatomical View Network Switch Kerberos (Security) Cluster Manager (Management & Monitoring) Job Tracker/ Resource Manager (Scheduler) Manual/Automatic Failover Client Nodes (Edge Nodes) Name Nodes (Master Node) Data Nodes (Slave Nodes) Figure 4 MapR or Hortonworks. These appliances are designed to solve a particular type of problem or for a particular workload in mind. • IBM Netezza 1000 is designed for high-per- formance business intelligence and advanced analytics. It’s a data warehouse appliance that can run complex and mixed workloads. In addition, it supports multiple languages (C/ C++, Java, Python, FORTRAN), frameworks (Hadoop) and tools (IBM SPSS, R and SAS). • The Teradata Aster appliance comes with 50 pre-built MapReduce functions optimized for graph, text and behavior/marketing analysis. It also comes with Aster Database and Apache Hadoop to process structured, unstructured and semi-structured data. A full Hadoop cabinet includes two masters and 16 data nodes which can deliver up to 152TB of user space. • The HP AppSystem appliance comes with pre- configured HP ProLiant DL380e Gen8 servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.1 and a Cloudera distribution. Enterprises can use this appliance with HP Vertica Community Edition to run real-time analysis of structured data. cognizant 20-20 insights HDFS and Hadoop HDFS is not the only platform for performing big data tasks. Vendors have emerged with solutions that offer a replacement for HDFS. For example, DataStax8 uses Cassandra; Amazon Web Services uses S3; IBM has General Parallel File System (GPFS); EMC relies on Isilon; MapR uses Direct NFS; etc. (To learn more, read about alternate technologies.)9 An EMC appliance uses Isilon scale-out NAS technology, along with HDFS. This combination eliminates the need to export/import the data into HDFS (see Figure 5, next page). IBM uses GPFS instead of HDFS in its solution after finding that GPFS performed better than HDFS (see Figure 6, also next page). Many IT shops are scrambling to build Hadoop clusters in their enterprise. The question is: What are they going to do with these clusters? Not every enterprise needs to have its own cluster; it all depends on the nature of the business and whether the cluster serves a legitimate and compelling business use case. For example, enterprises into financial transactions would definitely require an analytic platform for fraud detection, 5
    • EMC Subs Isilon for HDFS R (RHIPE) PIG Mahout Job Tracker HIVE HBASE Name Node Task Tracker Data Node Ethernet HCFS Figure 5 portfolio analysis, churn analysis, etc. Similarly, enterprises into research work require large-size clusters for faster processing and large data analysis. • Joyent, which offers Hadoop services based on Hadoop-as-a-Service • Mortar, which delivers Hadoop services based There are couple of ways in which Hadoop clusters can be leveraged in addition to building a new cluster or taking an appliance-based approach. A more cost-effective approach is to use Amazon10 Elastic Map-Reduce (EMR) service. Enterprises can build a cluster on demand and pay for the duration they used it. Amazon offers compute instances running open-source Apache Hadoop and MapR (M3/M5/M7) distribution. Other vendors that offer “Hadoop-as-a-Service” include: Hortonworks distribution. • Skytap, which provides Hadoop services based on Cloudera (CDH4) distribution. on MapR distribution. All of these vendors charge on a pay-per-use basis. New vendors will eventually emerge as market demand increases and more enterprises require additional analytics, business intelligence (BI) and data warehousing options. As the competitive stakes rise, we recommend comparing prices and capabilities to get the best price/performance for your big data environment. Benchmarking HDFS vs. GPFS Execution Time 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Postmark HDFS Teragen Grep GPFS Figure 6 cognizant 20-20 insights 6 CacheTest Terasort
    • The Hadoop platform by itself can’t do anything. Enterprises need applications that can leverage this platform. Developing an analytics application that offers business value requires data scientists and data analysts. These applications can perform many different types of jobs, from pure analytical, data and BI jobs through data processing. Hadoop can run all types of workloads, so it is becoming increasingly important to design an effective and efficient cluster using the latest technologies and framework. Hadoop Competitors The Hadoop framework provides a batch processing environment that works well with historical data in data warehouses and archives. What if there is a need to perform real-time processing such as in the case of fraud detection, bank transactions, etc.? Enterprises have begun assessing alternative approaches and technologies to solve this issue. Storm is an open source project that helps in setting up the environment for real-time (stream) processing. Besides, there are other options such as massively parallel processing (MPP), high performance computing cluster (HPCC) and Hadapt to consider. However, all these technologies will require a strong understanding of the workload that will be run. If the workload is more processing intensive, it’s always recommended to go with HPCC. Besides, HPCC uses a declarative programming language that is extensible, homogeneous and complete. It uses an Open Data Model which is not constrained by key-value pairs, and data processing can happen in parallel. To learn more, read HPCC vs. Hadoop.11 Massively parallel processing databases have been around even before MapReduce hit the market. It makes use of SQL as an interface to interact with the system. SQL is a commonly used language by data scientists and analysts. MPP systems are mainly used in high-end data warehouse implementations. Looking Ahead Hadoop is a strong framework for running data-intensive jobs, but it’s still evolving as the ecosystem projects around it mature and expand. Market demand is spurring new technological developments, daily. With these innovations come various options to choose from, such as building a new cluster, leveraging an appliance or making use of Hadoop-as-a-Service offerings. Moreover, the market is filling with new companies, which is creating more competitive technologies and options to consider. For starters, enterprises need to make the right decision in choosing their Hadoop distributions. Enterprises can start small by picking up any distribution and building a 5-10 node cluster to test the features, functionality and performance. Most reputable vendors provide a free version of their distribution for evaluation purposes. We advise enterprises to test 2-3 vendor distributions against its business requirements before making any final decisions. However, IT decision-makers should pay close attention to emerging competitors to position their organizations for impending technology enhancements. Footnotes 1 IDC report: Worldwide Big Data Technology and Services 2012-2015 Forecast. 2 www.centurylink.com/business/artifacts/pdf/resources/big-data-defining-the-digital-deluge.pdf. 3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadoop. 4 http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/YARN.html. 5 http://pig.apache.org/; http://hive.apache.org/; http://hbase.apache.org; “Comparing Pig Latin and SQL for Constructing Data Processing Pipelines,” developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/comparing-pig-latinsql-constructing-data-processing-pipelines-444.html; “Process a Million Songs with Apache Pig,” blog. cloudera.com/blog/2012/08/process-a-million-songs-with-apache-pig/. 6 www.revolutionanalytics.com/products/revolution-enterprise.php. 7 comStore report: Switching to MapR for Reliable Insights into Global Internet Consumer Behavior. 8 www.datastax.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/WP-DataStax-HDFSvsCFS.pdf. 9 gigaom.com/2012/07/11/because-hadoop-isnt-perfect-8-ways-to-replace-hdfs/. 10 aws.amazon.com/elasticmapreduce/pricing/. 11 hpccsystems.com/Why-HPCC/HPCC-vs-Hadoop. cognizant 20-20 insights 7
    • About the Authors Harish Chauhan is an Associate Director and leads new services development around big data and new emerging technologies for Cognizant’s General Technology Office. He has over 21 years of experience and holds a bachelor of engineering degree in computer science. His areas of expertise include virtualization, cloud computing and distributed computing (Hadoop/HPC). He contributed technical articles, co-authored an IBM Redbook on the virtualization engine and filed two patents in the areas of virtualization. He can be reached at Harish.Chauhan@cognizant.com. Jerald Murphy is Cognizant’s Worldwide Practice Leader for Cognizant Business Consulting’s IT Infrastructure Services Practice. He also leads Cognizant’s Technology Office for Enterprise Computing, Cloud Services and Emerging Technology. Jerry has spent over 20 years in the computer industry, in various technical, marketing, sales, senior management and industry analyst positions. He is one of the industry’s leading authorities on enterprise IT infrastructure design, security and management, and has spent 20-plus years conducting engineering research and helping to develop infrastructure and security strategies for many of the largest global companies and service providers. Jerry’s areas of expertise include data center infrastructure and enterprise systems management. Additional focus areas include managed services and IT outsourcing. Jerry has a B.S.E.E. from The United States Military Academy and a master’s degree in electrical engineering from Princeton University. He can be reached at Jerald.Murphy@ cognizant.com. About Cognizant Cognizant (NASDAQ: CTSH) is a leading provider of information technology, consulting, and business process outsourcing services, dedicated to helping the world’s leading companies build stronger businesses. Headquartered in Teaneck, New Jersey (U.S.), Cognizant combines a passion for client satisfaction, technology innovation, deep industry and business process expertise, and a global, collaborative workforce that embodies the future of work. With over 50 delivery centers worldwide and approximately 164,300 employees as of June 30, 2013, Cognizant is a member of the NASDAQ-100, the S&P 500, the Forbes Global 2000, and the Fortune 500 and is ranked among the top performing and fastest growing companies in the world. Visit us online at www.cognizant.com or follow us on Twitter: Cognizant. World Headquarters European Headquarters India Operations Headquarters 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd. Teaneck, NJ 07666 USA Phone: +1 201 801 0233 Fax: +1 201 801 0243 Toll Free: +1 888 937 3277 Email: inquiry@cognizant.com 1 Kingdom Street Paddington Central London W2 6BD Phone: +44 (0) 20 7297 7600 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7121 0102 Email: infouk@cognizant.com #5/535, Old Mahabalipuram Road Okkiyam Pettai, Thoraipakkam Chennai, 600 096 India Phone: +91 (0) 44 4209 6000 Fax: +91 (0) 44 4209 6060 Email: inquiryindia@cognizant.com © ­­ Copyright 2013, Cognizant. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the express written permission from Cognizant. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners.