Richard Allen Horning
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Richard Allen Horning

on

  • 609 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
609
Views on SlideShare
597
Embed Views
12

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 12

http://www.ejc.net 12

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Richard Allen Horning Richard Allen Horning Document Transcript

  • Intellectual Property - Challenges for the Journalist European Journalism Centre Maastricht November 2008 Richard Allan Horning Fish & Richardson PC Silicon Valley rhorning@fr.com RICHARD ALLAN HORNING Principal, Venture Technology Group, Fish & Richardson P.C., Silicon Valley Practicing Law in Silicon Valley Since 1970. Former Law Clerk, US Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) Clients have included Rolling Stone Magazine, Time-Life, New York Times, Intel, Honeywell, Data General, Piaggio SpA, Hewlett-Packard, Gigabit A/S [sale to Intel], Acer, Celo Communications Ltd [financed by Investor Growth Capital and sold to Gemplus] Past President, International Technology Law Association
  • INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
  • PROPERTY THE OUTPUT OFJOURNALISM IS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY • Reportage • Photo Journalism • Commentary • Criticism and Reviews • Editorial
  • WHO OWNS THE OUTPUT OF REPORTERS • The Publication / Employer – “Work for Hire” – Contracts as Controlling – Droit Morale • Free Lance Journalist • “Blogger” WHO CONTROLS THE OUTPUT OF JOURNALISTS • The “Boss” • The Government – Sunshine Laws • Private Industry – Libel Actions – Trade Secrets – Copyright Infringement • Fair Use • The News Source – Privacy Laws • Journalist Privilege
  • JOURNALISM’S IMPACT ON THE ECONOMY AND INNOVATION • Influences Political Decisions • Spots and Promotes Consumer Trends • Starts Mass Movements • Can Help Shape Public Attitudes JANUARY 24, 1848 Eureka ! “Gold Mine Found”, The Californian, March 15, 1848 “California, no doubt, is rich in mineral wealth; great chances are here for scientific capitalists”
  • THE BIG FOUR Crocker, Hopkins, Stanford, Huntington OPENING THE WEST 1863 - 1869
  • THE FARM CROCKER RESEARCH LAB
  • WHERE IT ALL STARTED TV CLEAN TECH IS ATTRACTING THE BIG BOYS “Represents the biggest economic opportunity of this century” - John Doerr, Kleiner Perkins, November 2006
  • WHO KNEW TONY WAS A CLEAN TECH ENTREPRENEUR VC INVESTMENTS IN CLEAN TECH • $263 M invested in 2002 • $224 M invested in 2003 • $418 M invested in 2004 • $497 M invested in 2005 • $1,496M invested in 2006 • $2,188M invested in 2007 • $2,758M invested thru Q3, 2008
  • WHO IS A JOURNALIST AND WHY DOES IT MATTER • Preferential Access to News Sources • Invitations to Newsworthy Events • Journalism as “Fair Use” • “Invitations” to Disclose Facts • Prohibitions Against Attendance and Publication THE CHALLENGES OF “DOING JOURNALISM” • Honor and Respect of the Public • Vilification as a “Left Wing” / “Right Wing” Stooge
  • GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE WITH THE PRACTICE OF JOURNALISM US v Earl Caldwell • Supreme Court in companion case Branzburg v Hayes (1972) held that there is no First Amendment news gathering privilege • US v Earl Caldwell held that a journalist, like any other citizen, can be compelled to appear before a secret grand jury • Outcome was state “shield” laws, allowing journalists to assert privilege against source disclosure under certain circumstances • Outcome was Dept of Justice guidelines restricting US government requiring journalists to divulge sources unless it’s the last resort • Note that publications can be sued for breaching obligations of confidentiality (Cohen v Cowles Media,1991)
  • GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF ACCESS ANGELA DAVIS • Without any legal authorization the Marin County Sherriff refused to allow press interviews of Angela Davis following her arrest for conspiracy to commit murder • Time / Life threatened to sue the Sherriff to gain access • Suit dropped when Ms. Davis put unacceptable conditions on the jail house interview with Time
  • GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF ACCESS GOVERNMENT CAN CONTROL ACCESS BY DENYING ACCESS • Hunter Thompson, acclaimed “gonzo” journalist and political reporter, denied press credentials by Ron Ziegler and Nixon White House • Suit threatened by Rolling Stone to force issuance of White House press credentials • Suit dropped when Thompson went to Mexico instead.
  • GOVERNMENT CAN CONTROL ACCESS BY DENYING ACCESS • Obama kicks Fox News reporters off his campaign airplane • Fight at 2008 Democratic Convention as to who would be given press credentials – issues was “bloggers” as journalists GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE TO GIVE ACCESS TO SOURCES • Sunshine laws usually have an exemption for law enforcement • California law provides an exception, that name of arrested person and the victim may be given to persons who swear that it is to be used for journalistic purpose – Opinion of California Attorney General (2006) confirms that law enforcement agency may not require evidence in support of sworn declaration – Requester need not have press “credentials” – Journalist requester need not monitor subsequent use of the information obtained
  • GOVERNMENT RETRIBUTION AGAINST JOURNALISM US v New York Times • Established that government cannot, except the most extraordinary circumstances, prevent publication of articles • This does not mean, of necessity, publication cannot be preliminarily enjoined – MTA vs MIT Students re hacked Charlie Cards
  • GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE WITH JOURNALIST INVESTIGATIONS “INVITATIONS” TO DISCLOSE FACTS AND SOURCES • Most recent rejection of special journalist privilege again revelation of sources, whether based on First Amendment or federal “common law”, is US v Miller (2007) • Investigation into who “outed” Valeria Plame, an alleged CIA agent whose husband Joseph Miller wrote a report denying that Saddam Hussein was buying uranium from Niger. • Ms. Miller spent 43 days in jail before being released by her source.
  • “INVITATIONS” TO DISCLOSE FACTS AND SOURCES PEOPLE V PATTY HEARST, WILLIAM AND EMILY HARRIS
  • “INVITATIONS” TO DISCLOSE FACTS AND SOURCES “INVITATIONS” TO DISCLOSE FACTS AND SOURCES • In prosecution of William and Emily Harris, leaders of the SLA, for murder arising out of Los Angeles “Sporting Good Store Shootout” defendants subpoenaed the two Rolling Stone reporters • At first they voluntarily testified, but refused to reveal sources • In face of motion to quash subpoena and protective order based on First Amendment and California shield law, the reporters excused from testifying
  • PRIVATE ATTEMPTS AT CONTROL OF JOURNALISM • Apple v Does • MTA v MIT Students • DeCSS vs Bloggers UNFORSEEN OPPORTUNITIES FOR EXPLOITATION OF IP • New York Times v Tasini (2001) – Free lance authors licensed print versions – Compilation by NY Times in databases violated copyright of journalists
  • UNFORSEEN OPPORTUNITIES FOR EXPLOITATION OF IP “I NEVER SAW THE COVER”
  • CONCLUDING POINTS • Journalists create and own intellectual property • Control of use of journalist IP will devolve to contract, with the decline of “employee” journalists in the wake of declining circulation of main stream press • Who is a “journalist” will remain an important question • Professional organizations can play an important role in developing standards for defining what constitutes “doing journalism” • Opportunities for multiple exploitation of the “work” may exist • Independent Journalists need financially powerful friends!