So you want your students to produce digital video: some practical guidance

1,382 views
1,328 views

Published on

These slides formed part of a workshop at the 3rd Science Learning and Teaching Conference organised by science subject centres of the Higher Education Academy (UK). The Conference took place at Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh in June 2009.

The workshop was based on our experience organising two distinct projects in which students produce digital video. In one, students keep a video diary of their experience as an undergraduate. In the second, students produce short videos about a bioethical topic they have been assigned. The video content is not included as part of this presentation.
(c) Chris Willmott and Chris Cane, 2009

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,382
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
250
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
13
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

So you want your students to produce digital video: some practical guidance

  1. 1. SLTC09, Heriot-Watt, June 2009 So you want your students to produce digital videos? - some practical guidance - Dr Chris Cane Dr Chris Willmott Dept of Genetics, Dept of Biochemistry, University of Leicester University of Leicester crc@le.ac.uk cjrw2@le.ac.uk University of Leicester THE University of the Year 2008
  2. 2. Introduction: why video? • Video = engaging media (not new, not rocket science) • The YouTube phenomenon • Opportunities for creativity • Prices  • Ease of editing  • Attractive alternative to essays and/or questionnaires
  3. 3. Outline of session • Example uses: Two recent projects at Leicester • A chance to have a go at filming or editing • Feedback, Q&A • Some practical advice (including some learnt the hard way!)
  4. 4. Example 1: Student experience project • As shown by Paul Green presentation yesterday • Students issued with a video camera to record video diaries • Submit weekly video (and take part in 3-4 focus groups) • Not an assessed activity, entirely a research project • Students keep camera at end of project
  5. 5. Example 2: Bioethics videos • Second year Medical Biochemistry students (n=30) • Produce 2 to 5 minute film on science and ethics of a current development in biomedicine (assigned) • Allocated to teams of 4 or 5 • Given approximately 6 weeks to complete • Marking: 70% for accuracy and clarity 30% for creativity and production • Peer-weighting applied after team mark awarded
  6. 6. Example video clips (1) Use of animals in research (2009)
  7. 7. Example video clips (2) Xenotransplantation (2008)
  8. 8. Example video clips (3) Transhumanism & Genetic Enhancement (2008)
  9. 9. Example video clip (4) Gene therapy (2009)
  10. 10. Example video clips (5a) Cognitive Enhancement (2009, part 1)
  11. 11. Example video clips (5b) Cognitive Enhancement (2009, part 2)
  12. 12. Example video clips (6) Use of Human Tissue (2008)
  13. 13. Interaction: time to give it a try Activity 1: Shoot some scenes for a short educational film (various cameras available) Activity 2: Edit some pre-recorded footage using Windows Movie Maker
  14. 14. Comments, feedback, questions Formation of teams Copyright, ethical and topics approval, etc What training are students offered? What More examples Issues we software? of student films could discuss Allocation of Choice of cameras: individual marks what and why? for team activity Scepticism from Other ideas? Colleagues/Students
  15. 15. Equipment: which cameras? • Choice of camera depends on several factors inc. - budget - type of project - DV tape v storage card? • For video diary portability and ease of data exchange key (hand in one SD card, issued new) • Sound quality is vital, especially for ‘content driven’ project, external microphone jack essential • Only brand with mike jack on entry level models is Canon (e.g. Canon MD205, approx £200)
  16. 16. Equipment: which cameras? • Video diary: - portability - ease of data exchange (hand in one SD card, issued new) - e.g. Panasonic SDR-S7 (and newer models)
  17. 17. Equipment: which cameras? • Bioethics videos: - ‘content-driven’ sound quality = vital - external microphone jack essential - Only brand with mike jack on entry level models is Canon (e.g. MD205, approx £200)
  18. 18. Training • Clips: - example film from YouTube etc (not all good) Patrick Dixon (http://tinyurl.com/ndg77w) Common Craft (http://tinyurl.com/yvdezp) Josh & Adam (http://tinyurl.com/nevag4) - previous student films • Recommended websites • Discussion of roles within project • Indicative milestones • Briefing sheet
  19. 19. Training: online advice and tutorials • Fourdocs (http://tinyurl.com/FourDocs) • BBC Good Shooting (http://tinyurl.com/GoodShoot) • Mashable (http://tinyurl.com/MashableMix) • Videomaker (http://www.videomaker.com)
  20. 20. Issues: colleagues perception? • “How can you say anything meaningful in a four minute film? Better to set an essay” • You can say a lot in four minutes • Evidence students actually need good grasp of the issues to decide what to include
  21. 21. Issues: copyright and permissions • Assessment v Wider usage? - limited use of copyrighted images and/or sound allowed for assessed activities but not wider distribution • Encouraged to be copyright-free • Informed Written Consent from interviewees to allow use on the internet
  22. 22. Teamwork – allocation of teams • Bioethics film production > individual task • Pre-activity questionnaire inc prior experience qn • Semester 1 scores in biochem module • Friendship groups? (seats in lecture #1?) • Allocation of weak students? - distributed? - form one group?
  23. 23. Teamwork – allocation of marks • Each team awarded a mark for their project (70% content, 30% production & creativity) • Peer-generated weighting then applied to mark to produce mark for each team member • Conway et al (1993) Peer assessment of an individual’s contribution to a group project Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18:45-56 • Details available on request
  24. 24. Equipment: storage & distribution • Will student/team be issued with camera for duration of project or will they be signed in/out? • If signed in/out where will they be stored and how will this be administered? • Security? Damage? Insurance? • Penalty for late return of kit?
  25. 25. Alternative ideas • Full-blown video too complex/too expensive? • Combine audio soundtrack with still photos = form of “digital storytelling”
  26. 26. Weighting students’ contributions • Each student awards a mark of 1 to 5 to each member of their team (inc themselves) for a number of different criteria • Average mark (= A): Grand total (all scores for all students in team) Number of student in team • Individual student total (= B): Sum of all that student’s scores awarded by all team members (inc themselves) • Weighting for individual student: Individual total (B) University of Average mark (A) Leicester

×