Cb legislative session january 2013 crosstabs
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Cb legislative session january 2013 crosstabs

on

  • 321 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
321
Views on SlideShare
212
Embed Views
109

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

3 Embeds 109

http://www.civilbeat.com 95
http://m.civilbeat.com 13
http://cb-prod.herokuapp.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Cb legislative session january 2013 crosstabs Cb legislative session january 2013 crosstabs Document Transcript

  • 1 • 813 Registered Voters Throughout Hawaii • January 7-8, 2013 • 16% Cell Phones, 84% LandlinesGambling Gambl ing * Oba ma_Condensed Cross tabu lation% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureGambling Legal 37% 35% 36% Not Legal 53% 57% 36% Doesnt Matter 7% 6% 12% Unsure 3% 2% 17%Total 100% 100% 100% Gambl ing * Abe rcro mbie_ Condensed Cross tabul ation% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureGambling Legal 36% 39% 24% Not Legal 54% 53% 44% Doesnt Matter 8% 5% 11% Unsure 2% 2% 22%Total 100% 100% 100% Gambl ing * Gende r Cross tabu lation% within Gender Gender Male FemaleGambling Legal 45% 30% Not Legal 46% 59% Doesnt Matter 6% 8% Unsure 4% 3%Total 100% 100% Gambl ing * Age_G roup C rosstabu lation% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+Gambling Legal 49% 22% 32% 43% 35% Not Legal 21% 57% 64% 48% 58% Doesnt Matter 31% 12% 4% 5% 5% Unsure 10% 4% 3%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 2 Gambling * Race_E thncity Cross tabu lation% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedGambling Legal 38% 33% 35% 41% 34% 71% 35% Not Legal 53% 58% 49% 54% 56% 14% 51% Doesnt Matter 6% 6% 13% 2% 5% 14% 11% Unsure 2% 4% 3% 4% 5% 3%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Gambl ing * PhoneType Crosstabu lation% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineGambling Legal 36% 46% 33% Not Legal 56% 33% 49% Doesnt Matter 5% 18% 11% Unsure 3% 3% 7%Total 100% 100% 100% Gambl ing * Pol i tics C rosstabu lation% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureGambling Legal 34% 42% 33% 38% Not Legal 59% 51% 59% 40% Doesnt 4% 7% 7% 13% Matter Unsure 3% 1% 2% 9%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Gambl ing * Pa rty_ ID Cross tabu lation% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureGambling Legal 35% 33% 40% 45% Not Legal 55% 57% 53% 17% Doesnt Matter 7% 9% 4% 21% Unsure 3% 2% 2% 17%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 3 Gambl ing * Educa tion C rosstabu lation% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeGambling Legal 44% 40% 39% 29% Not Legal 19% 51% 54% 60% Doesnt Matter 19% 7% 6% 6% Unsure 19% 3% 1% 6%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Gambl ing * Rela tionship C rosstabu la tion% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedGambling Legal 37% 62% 32% 37% 32% Not Legal 56% 27% 49% 52% 59% Doesnt Matter 4% 12% 14% 7% 8% Unsure 3% 5% 5% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Gambl ing * M il ita ry_Fa mi ly C ross tabula tio n% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoGambling Legal 33% 38% Not Legal 56% 52% Doesnt Matter 8% 7% Unsure 3% 3%Total 100% 100% Gambl ing * Un ion_Household C ross tabula tion% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoGambling Legal 38% 36% Not Legal 53% 53% Doesnt Matter 5% 7% Unsure 4% 3%Total 100% 100%
  • 4 Gambl ing * Inco me Cross tabu lation% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreGambling Legal 34% 38% 35% Not Legal 54% 51% 60% Doesnt Matter 9% 7% 3% Unsure 3% 3% 2%Total 100% 100% 100% Gambl ing * Vo ted2008 C ross tabula tion% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesGambling Legal 43% 35% Not Legal 42% 56% Doesnt Matter 11% 6% Unsure 5% 4%Total 100% 100% Gambl ing * Vo ted2010 C ross tabula tion% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesGambling Legal 44% 35% Not Legal 46% 55% Doesnt Matter 5% 7% Unsure 6% 3%Total 100% 100%
  • 5 Casino * Obama_ Condensed C ross tabula tion% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureCasino Support 32% 27% 16% Oppose 59% 66% 42% Doesnt Matter 6% 4% 28% Unsure 3% 2% 14%Total 100% 100% 100% Casino * Abe rcro mbie_ Condensed C ross tabula ti on% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureCasino Support 34% 26% 20% Oppose 59% 63% 45% Doesnt Matter 4% 8% 15% Unsure 2% 3% 20%Total 100% 100% 100% Casino * Gende r C ross tabula ti on% within Gender Gender Male FemaleCasino Support 35% 25% Oppose 55% 64% Doesnt Matter 6% 7% Unsure 4% 3%Total 100% 100% Casino * Age_G roup Cross tabu lation% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+Casino Support 51% 28% 31% 31% 26% Oppose 23% 53% 67% 60% 65% Doesnt Matter 26% 3% 2% 5% 6% Unsure 15% 4% 2%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 6 Casino * Race_E thnci ty C ross tabula tion% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedCasino Support 36% 15% 40% 28% 31% 38% 27% Oppose 58% 74% 50% 62% 56% 38% 60% Doesnt Matter 4% 7% 5% 8% 10% 13% 9% Unsure 2% 4% 6% 2% 3% 13% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Casino * PhoneType Cross tabu lation% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineCasino Support 26% 51% 39% Oppose 63% 43% 50% Doesnt Matter 7% 3% 9% Unsure 4% 3% 2%Total 100% 100% 100% Casino * Pol itics Crosstabu lation% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureCasino Support 31% 33% 25% 29% Oppose 62% 59% 66% 50% Doesnt Matter 3% 6% 4% 17% Unsure 4% 2% 5% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Casino * Party_ ID Cross tabula tion% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureCasino Support 30% 28% 30% 39% Oppose 60% 68% 62% 14% Doesnt Matter 7% 2% 7% 25% Unsure 4% 2% 2% 21%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 7 Casino * Education Crosstabu lation% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeCasino Support 38% 29% 31% 26% Oppose 44% 60% 59% 64% Doesnt Matter 8% 7% 6% Unsure 19% 3% 3% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Casino * Rela tionship C rosstabu lation% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedCasino Support 29% 54% 26% 36% 21% Oppose 62% 38% 56% 59% 64% Doesnt Matter 4% 14% 5% 10% Unsure 4% 8% 4% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Casino * M il ita ry_Fam ily C ross tabula tion% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoCasino Support 26% 30% Oppose 66% 59% Doesnt Matter 4% 8% Unsure 4% 4%Total 100% 100% Casino * Union_ Household C rosstabu la tion% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoCasino Support 31% 29% Oppose 61% 60% Doesnt Matter 6% 7% Unsure 3% 4%Total 100% 100%
  • 8 Casino * Inco me C ross tabula ti on% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreCasino Support 34% 27% 22% Oppose 58% 58% 71% Doesnt Matter 3% 10% 6% Unsure 4% 4% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% Casino * Voted2008 C rosstabu la tion% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesCasino Support 38% 27% Oppose 45% 64% Doesnt Matter 11% 6% Unsure 6% 3%Total 100% 100% Casino * Voted2010 C rosstabu la tion% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesCasino Support 38% 26% Oppose 47% 64% Doesnt Matter 6% 7% Unsure 9% 3%Total 100% 100%
  • 9 Lotte ry * Oba ma_Condensed Cross tabu lation% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureLottery Support 55% 60% 60% Oppose 35% 32% 19% Doesnt Matter 6% 3% 10% Unsure 4% 5% 12%Total 100% 100% 100% Lotte ry * Abe rcro mb ie_Condensed Cross tabu lati on% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureLottery Support 60% 57% 42% Oppose 32% 34% 33% Doesnt Matter 6% 3% 7% Unsure 2% 6% 18%Total 100% 100% 100% Lotte ry * Gende r Cross tabu lation% within Gender Gender Male FemaleLottery Support 65% 52% Oppose 29% 36% Doesnt Matter 4% 6% Unsure 3% 6%Total 100% 100% Lotte ry * Age_G roup C rosstabu lation% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+Lottery Support 64% 55% 58% 66% 51% Oppose 21% 33% 32% 27% 38% Doesnt Matter 8% 4% 3% 8% Unsure 8% 12% 5% 4% 3%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 10 Lotte ry * Race_E thncity Cross tabu lation% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedLottery Support 59% 58% 59% 63% 51% 75% 53% Oppose 32% 27% 33% 31% 38% 13% 39% Doesnt Matter 4% 8% 2% 2% 5% 13% 6% Unsure 5% 6% 6% 4% 7% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Lotte ry * PhoneType C rosstabu lation% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineLottery Support 59% 63% 50% Oppose 33% 27% 34% Doesnt Matter 4% 4% 11% Unsure 5% 6% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% Lotte ry * Po li tics C rosstabu lation% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureLottery Support 50% 60% 61% 63% Oppose 39% 32% 34% 19% Doesnt Matter 5% 5% 2% 9% Unsure 6% 4% 3% 9%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Lotte ry * Pa rty_ ID Cross tabu lation% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureLottery Support 54% 64% 61% 71% Oppose 35% 32% 31% 7% Doesnt Matter 6% 1% 5% 4% Unsure 5% 4% 4% 18%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 11 Lotte ry * Educa tion C rosstabu lation% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeLottery Support 53% 63% 59% 53% Oppose 20% 32% 29% 38% Doesnt Matter 20% 3% 6% 3% Unsure 7% 2% 6% 6%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Lotte ry * Re lationship C rosstabu la tion% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedLottery Support 58% 72% 63% 63% 51% Oppose 34% 8% 26% 33% 35% Doesnt Matter 3% 12% 5% 3% 9% Unsure 5% 8% 7% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Lotte ry * M il ita ry_Fa mi ly C ross tabula tion% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoLottery Support 56% 59% Oppose 32% 32% Doesnt Matter 7% 4% Unsure 5% 5%Total 100% 100% Lotte ry * Un ion_Househol d C ross tabula tion% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoLottery Support 62% 58% Oppose 30% 33% Doesnt Matter 3% 5% Unsure 5% 5%Total 100% 100%
  • 12 Lotte ry * Inco me Cross tabu lation% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreLottery Support 55% 65% 51% Oppose 34% 24% 43% Doesnt Matter 7% 2% 3% Unsure 3% 8% 3%Total 100% 100% 100% Lotte ry * Vo ted2008 C ross tabula tion% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesLottery Support 62% 55% Oppose 31% 35% Doesnt Matter 2% 5% Unsure 6% 5%Total 100% 100% Lotte ry * Vo ted2010 C ross tabula tion% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesLottery Support 55% 56% Oppose 34% 35% Doesnt Matter 1% 5% Unsure 10% 4%Total 100% 100%
  • 13 Gambl ing * Casino C ross tabula tion% within Casino Casino Doesnt Support Oppose Matter UnsureGambling Legal 73% 19% 48% 19% Not Legal 15% 77% 17% 33% Doesnt Matter 10% 3% 25% 15% Unsure 2% 2% 10% 33%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Gambl ing * Lotte ry Cross tabula tion% within Lottery Lottery Doesnt Support Oppose Matter UnsureGambling Legal 57% 9% 16% Not Legal 31% 87% 54% 68% Doesnt Matter 8% 3% 22% 6% Unsure 3% 1% 8% 26%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%% within Gambling Gambling Not Doesnt Legal Legal Matter UnsureCasino Support 59% 8% 41% 19% Oppose 30% 87% 27% 27% Doesnt Matter 9% 2% 24% 19% Unsure 2% 2% 8% 35%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Casino * Lotte ry C ross tabula tion% within Lottery Lottery Doesnt Support Oppose Matter UnsureCasino Support 45% 8% 24% 3% Oppose 42% 90% 54% 62% Doesnt Matter 10% 1% 16% Unsure 2% 1% 5% 35%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 14 Lotte ry * Ga mbling Cross tabula tion% within Gambling Gambling Not Doesnt Legal Legal Matter UnsureLottery Support 89% 34% 66% 48% Oppose 8% 55% 14% 7% Doesnt Matter 2% 5% 16% 11% Unsure 6% 4% 33%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Lotte ry * Cas ino C ross tabula tion% within Casino Casino Doesnt Support Oppose Matter UnsureLottery Support 87% 40% 84% 37% Oppose 9% 50% 4% 11% Doesnt Matter 4% 5% 12% 7% Unsure 0% 5% 44%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 15Civil Unions/Marriage Equality Civi lUn ion * Obama_Co ndensed C ross tabula tion% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureCivilUnion Support 60% 24% 31% Oppose 30% 65% 50% Doesnt Matter 7% 7% 10% Unsure 3% 3% 10%Total 100% 100% 100% CivilUn ion * Aberc ro mbie_Con densed C ross tabu lation% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureCivilUnion Support 59% 37% 41% Oppose 32% 54% 32% Doesnt Matter 7% 6% 11% Unsure 3% 3% 16%Total 100% 100% 100% Civi lUn ion * Gende r C ross tabula tion% within Gender Gender Male FemaleCivilUnion Support 43% 53% Oppose 46% 38% Doesnt Matter 7% 6% Unsure 4% 3%Total 100% 100% Civi lUn ion * Age_G roup Cross tabu lation% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+CivilUnion Support 67% 54% 62% 43% 44% Oppose 21% 36% 37% 45% 45% Doesnt Matter 13% 3% 1% 7% 8% Unsure 7% 5% 3%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 16 Civi lUn ion * Race_Ethnc i ty C ross tabula tio n% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedCivilUnion Support 63% 46% 37% 38% 34% 29% 48% Oppose 30% 45% 55% 51% 49% 57% 37% Doesnt Matter 6% 4% 3% 9% 10% 14% 10% Unsure 1% 5% 5% 2% 7% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Civi lUn ion * PhoneType Cross tabula tion% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineCivilUnion Support 50% 48% 41% Oppose 41% 42% 41% Doesnt Matter 6% 9% 11% Unsure 3% 1% 7%Total 100% 100% 100% Civi lUn ion * Pol itics Cross tabu lation% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureCivilUnion Support 80% 55% 18% 35% Oppose 13% 39% 71% 46% Doesnt 3% 6% 7% 12% Matter Unsure 4% 1% 4% 7%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Civi lUn ion * Party_ID C ross tabula tion% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureCivilUnion Support 67% 24% 36% 48% Oppose 23% 69% 54% 31% Doesnt Matter 6% 5% 8% 3% Unsure 3% 2% 3% 17%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 17 Civi lUn ion * Education Cross tabu lation% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeCivilUnion Support 38% 39% 47% 63% Oppose 25% 51% 47% 24% Doesnt Matter 25% 8% 3% 9% Unsure 13% 2% 4% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Civi lUn ion * Rela tionsh ip C rosstabu lation% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedCivilUnion Support 48% 56% 54% 42% 49% Oppose 43% 24% 36% 52% 42% Doesnt Matter 5% 16% 6% 3% 8% Unsure 4% 4% 4% 3% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% CivilUn ion * Mi l ita ry_Fam ily C rosstab ula tion% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoCivilUnion Support 45% 50% Oppose 44% 41% Doesnt Matter 6% 6% Unsure 5% 3%Total 100% 100% CivilUn ion * Union_ Household C rosstabu la tion% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoCivilUnion Support 51% 48% Oppose 41% 42% Doesnt Matter 6% 6% Unsure 3% 4%Total 100% 100%
  • 18 Civi lUn ion * Inco me C ross tabula tion% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreCivilUnion Support 41% 51% 63% Oppose 48% 38% 31% Doesnt Matter 7% 7% 2% Unsure 3% 4% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% Civi lUn ion * Voted2008 C rosstabu la tion% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesCivilUnion Support 31% 49% Oppose 54% 41% Doesnt Matter 9% 7% Unsure 6% 3%Total 100% 100% Civi lUn ion * Voted2010 C rosstabu la tion% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesCivilUnion Support 35% 50% Oppose 45% 41% Doesnt Matter 14% 6% Unsure 6% 3%Total 100% 100%
  • 19 Marriage * Oba ma_Condensed C rosstabu la tion% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureMarriage Yes 54% 18% 33% No 38% 77% 52% Doesnt Matter 7% 4% 5% Unsure 2% 1% 10%Total 100% 100% 100% Marriage * Abe rc romb ie_Condensed C rosstabu la tion% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureMarriage Yes 53% 32% 38% No 41% 60% 43% Doesnt Matter 6% 5% 7% Unsure 1% 3% 13%Total 100% 100% 100% Marriage * Gende r C rosstabu lation% within Gender Gender Male FemaleMarriage Yes 38% 47% No 56% 43% Doesnt Matter 4% 7% Unsure 2% 3%Total 100% 100% Marriage * Age_ Group C ross tabula tion% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+Marriage Yes 67% 58% 59% 37% 35% No 21% 37% 36% 55% 56% Doesnt Matter 13% 4% 4% 8% Unsure 5% 4% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 20 Marriage * Race_E thnc ity C rosstabu la tion% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedMarriage Yes 53% 42% 34% 34% 31% 38% 44% No 43% 49% 59% 57% 55% 63% 44% Doesnt Matter 2% 5% 6% 9% 11% 11% Unsure 2% 4% 1% 3% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Marriage * PhoneType C ross tabula tion% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineMarriage Yes 44% 42% 38% No 48% 51% 54% Doesnt Matter 5% 7% 7% Unsure 3% 2%Total 100% 100% 100% Marriage * Po li tics C ross tabula tion% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureMarriage Yes 73% 47% 13% 34% No 22% 45% 83% 48% Doesnt Matter 3% 6% 3% 13% Unsure 3% 2% 1% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Marriage * Pa rty_ID C rosstabu la tion% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureMarriage Yes 61% 18% 31% 48% No 31% 82% 57% 41% Doesnt Matter 6% 1% 9% Unsure 2% 3% 10%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 21 Marriage * Educa ti on C ross tabula tion% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeMarriage Yes 19% 35% 44% 53% No 50% 56% 52% 38% Doesnt Matter 31% 7% 4% 4% Unsure 2% 1% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Marriage * Re lationsh ip C ross tabula tion% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedMarriage Yes 42% 52% 49% 35% 44% No 51% 32% 45% 57% 48% Doesnt Matter 4% 16% 5% 5% 6% Unsure 3% 2% 3% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Marriage * Mi li tary_Fa mi ly Crosstabu lation% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoMarriage Yes 39% 44% No 54% 48% Doesnt Matter 5% 5% Unsure 2% 2%Total 100% 100% Marriage * Un ion_Househo ld Cross tabu lation% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoMarriage Yes 45% 43% No 47% 50% Doesnt Matter 5% 5% Unsure 3% 2%Total 100% 100%
  • 22 Marriage * Income C rosstabu lation% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreMarriage Yes 34% 48% 55% No 58% 45% 38% Doesnt Matter 7% 4% 4% Unsure 0% 4% 3%Total 100% 100% 100% Marriage * Vo ted2008 Cross tabu lation% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesMarriage Yes 25% 43% No 70% 48% Doesnt Matter 3% 6% Unsure 2% 3%Total 100% 100% Marriage * Vo ted2010 Cross tabu lation% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesMarriage Yes 33% 44% No 58% 48% Doesnt Matter 5% 6% Unsure 5% 2%Total 100% 100%
  • 23 Marriage Decide * Oba ma_Condensed Cross tabu l ation% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureMarriageDecide Voters 53% 76% 48% Legislature/Governor 15% 7% Courts 9% 4% 2% Federal 15% 11% 19% Other/Unsure 8% 3% 31%Total 100% 100% 100% Marriage Decide * Abe rc romb ie_Condensed Cros stabula tion% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureMarriageDecide Voters 53% 70% 40% Legislature/Governor 16% 9% 2% Courts 10% 4% 11% Federal 16% 11% 13% Other/Unsure 6% 6% 35%Total 100% 100% 100% Marriage Decide * Gende r Cross tabu lation% within Gender Gender Male FemaleMarriageDecide Voters 62% 58% Legislature/Governor 12% 11% Courts 6% 8% Federal 14% 14% Other/Unsure 7% 9%Total 100% 100% Marriage Decide * Age_G roup C rosstabu la tion% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+MarriageDecide Voters 58% 43% 53% 66% 61% Legislature/Governor 8% 18% 19% 9% 10% Courts 5% 10% 11% 5% 6% Federal 8% 15% 16% 14% 14% Other/Unsure 21% 13% 1% 5% 9%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 24 Marriage Decide * Race_E thnci ty Cross tabu lation% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedMarriageDecide Voters 60% 59% 59% 60% 64% 71% 62% Legislature/Governor 11% 16% 14% 11% 7% 14% 9% Courts 8% 3% 7% 4% 10% 0% 8% Federal 18% 13% 10% 13% 13% 14% 9% Other/Unsure 2% 9% 9% 11% 7% 13%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Marriage Decide * PhoneType C rosstabu lation% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineMarriageDecide Voters 62% 56% 49% Legislature/Governor 13% 7% 7% Courts 6% 7% 12% Federal 13% 18% 16% Other/Unsure 6% 12% 16%Total 100% 100% 100% Marriage Decide * Po li tics C rosstabu la tion% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureMarriageDecide Voters 41% 64% 79% 55% Legislature/Governor 22% 12% 6% 5% Courts 12% 5% 3% 8% Federal 15% 13% 9% 18% Other/Unsure 11% 5% 3% 14%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Marriage Decide * Pa rty_ ID C rosstabu lation% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureMarriageDecide Voters 50% 74% 69% 48% Legislature/Governor 17% 5% 9% Courts 11% 3% 3% 3% Federal 12% 13% 15% 14% Other/Unsure 9% 4% 3% 34%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 25 Marriage Decide * Educa tion C rosstabu la tion% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeMarriageDecide Voters 41% 63% 65% 51% Legislature/Governor 18% 7% 8% 24% Courts 5% 8% 8% Federal 18% 15% 14% 11% Other/Unsure 24% 10% 6% 7%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Marriage Decide * Re lationship C ross tabula tion% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedMarriageDecide Voters 62% 50% 54% 69% 60% Legislature/Governor 11% 15% 15% 10% 12% Courts 8% 4% 3% 3% 6% Federal 12% 19% 16% 14% 13% Other/Unsure 7% 12% 12% 3% 9%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Marriage Decide * M il itary_Fa mi ly Cross tabula tio n% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoMarriageDecide Voters 63% 59% Legislature/Governor 11% 12% Courts 6% 7% Federal 14% 14% Other/Unsure 7% 8%Total 100% 100% Marriage Decide * Un ion_Househo ld C ross tabula tion% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoMarriageDecide Voters 56% 62% Legislature/Governor 14% 11% Courts 9% 6% Federal 13% 14% Other/Unsure 7% 8%Total 100% 100%
  • 26 Marriage Decide * Inco me Cross tabu lation% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreMarriageDecide Voters 55% 65% 57% Legislature/Governor 14% 11% 14% Courts 5% 8% 9% Federal 19% 11% 11% Other/Unsure 7% 5% 9%Total 100% 100% 100% Marriage Decide * Vo ted2008 C ross tabula ti on% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesMarriageDecide Voters 72% 58% Legislature/Governor 5% 13% Courts 2% 8% Federal 11% 14% Other/Unsure 11% 7%Total 100% 100% Marriage Decide * Vo ted2010 C ross tabula ti on% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesMarriageDecide Voters 61% 58% Legislature/Governor 10% 12% Courts 5% 7% Federal 13% 14% Other/Unsure 11% 7%Total 100% 100%
  • 27 Civi lUn ion * Ma rriage Cross tabu lation% within Marriage Marriage Doesnt Yes No Matter UnsureCivilUnion Support 95% 11% 29% 25% Oppose 4% 78% 14% 6% Doesnt Matter 1% 7% 52% 13% Unsure 0% 4% 5% 56%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Civi lUn ion * Ma rriageDec ide C ross tabula tion% within MarriageDecide MarriageDecide Voters Legislature/Governor Courts Federal Other/UnsureCivilUnion Support 38% 71% 62% 63% 43% Oppose 53% 18% 24% 31% 28% Doesnt Matter 6% 10% 10% 4% 10% Unsure 2% 1% 4% 2% 19%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Marriage * C ivi lUn ion Cross tabu lation% within CivilUnion CivilUnion Doesnt Support Oppose Matter UnsureMarriage Yes 84% 4% 4% 4% No 11% 94% 49% 54% Doesnt Matter 4% 2% 43% 8% Unsure 1% 0% 4% 35%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Marriage * Marria geDecide C rosstabu la tion% within MarriageDecide MarriageDecide Voters Legislature/Governor Courts Federal Other/UnsureMarriage Yes 32% 73% 61% 53% 36% No 61% 24% 31% 39% 39% Doesnt Matter 5% 1% 8% 6% 14% Unsure 2% 1% 2% 12%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 28 Marriage Decide * C ivilUn ion C ross tabula tion% within CivilUnion CivilUnion Doesnt Support Oppose Matter UnsureMarriageDecide Voters 48% 75% 54% 38% Legislature/Governor 17% 5% 16% 4% Courts 9% 4% 10% 8% Federal 18% 10% 8% 8% Other/Unsure 7% 5% 12% 42%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Marriage Decide * Ma rriage C rosstabu la tion% within Marriage Marriage Doesnt Yes No Matter UnsureMarriageDecide Voters 45% 73% 55% 41% Legislature/Governor 20% 6% 2% 6% Courts 10% 5% 10% Federal 17% 11% 14% 12% Other/Unsure 7% 6% 19% 41%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 29Elections by Mail VoteByMa il * Obama_Condensed C rosstabu la tion% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureVoteByMail Yes 52% 40% 26% No 33% 42% 26% Doesnt Matter 8% 12% 29% Unsure 6% 6% 19%Total 100% 100% 100% VoteByMa il * Abe rc romb ie_Condensed C rosstab ulation% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureVoteByMail Yes 54% 42% 35% No 34% 39% 18% Doesnt Matter 7% 11% 24% Unsure 5% 7% 24%Total 100% 100% 100% VoteByMa il * Gender C rosstabu la tion% within Gender Gender Male FemaleVoteByMail Yes 53% 44% No 33% 36% Doesnt Matter 7% 13% Unsure 6% 8%Total 100% 100%% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+VoteByMail Yes 33% 46% 51% 45% 52% No 41% 32% 37% 38% 32% Doesnt Matter 18% 8% 8% 10% 10% Unsure 8% 14% 4% 7% 6%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 30% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedVoteByMail Yes 56% 54% 28% 40% 48% 57% 44% No 32% 29% 45% 38% 35% 29% 40% Doesnt Matter 7% 7% 19% 15% 8% 14% 12% Unsure 5% 10% 8% 8% 8% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% VoteByMa il * PhoneType C ross tabula tion% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineVoteByMail Yes 47% 51% 49% No 34% 42% 32% Doesnt Matter 11% 6% 7% Unsure 7% 1% 12%Total 100% 100% 100% VoteByMa il * Po litics C ross tabula tio n% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureVoteByMail Yes 54% 47% 47% 40% No 33% 35% 41% 30% Doesnt 6% 13% 7% 17% Matter Unsure 7% 5% 5% 13%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% VoteByMa il * Pa rty_ID C rossta bula tion% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureVoteByMail Yes 53% 44% 48% 17% No 31% 40% 40% 27% Doesnt Matter 9% 11% 9% 30% Unsure 8% 5% 3% 27%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 31 VoteByMa il * Educa tion C ross tabula tio n% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeVoteByMail Yes 50% 47% 46% 50% No 25% 34% 37% 34% Doesnt Matter 6% 13% 12% 6% Unsure 19% 6% 5% 9%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% VoteByMa il * Re la tionsh ip Cross tabula tion% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedVoteByMail Yes 46% 54% 47% 58% 46% No 37% 31% 32% 29% 37% Doesnt Matter 11% 12% 10% 10% 8% Unsure 6% 4% 10% 3% 9%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% VoteByMa il * Mi li ta ry_Fam ily C rosstabu lation% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoVoteByMail Yes 38% 49% No 43% 33% Doesnt Matter 11% 11% Unsure 8% 7%Total 100% 100% VoteByMa il * Un ion_Househo ld Cross tabu lation% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoVoteByMail Yes 51% 47% No 34% 36% Doesnt Matter 10% 11% Unsure 5% 7%Total 100% 100%
  • 32 VoteByMa il * Income C rosstabu la tion% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreVoteByMail Yes 41% 48% 56% No 41% 33% 31% Doesnt Matter 11% 12% 9% Unsure 7% 7% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% VoteByMa il * Vo ted2008 Cross tabu lation% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesVoteByMail Yes 44% 47% No 36% 35% Doesnt Matter 15% 10% Unsure 5% 8%Total 100% 100% VoteByMa il * Vo ted2010 Cross tabu lation% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesVoteByMail Yes 44% 47% No 33% 35% Doesnt Matter 11% 11% Unsure 11% 6%Total 100% 100%
  • 33Budget Deficit BudgetDe fic it * Obama_Condensed C rosstabu la ti on% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureBudgetDeficit Excise tax 21% 12% 10% Retirees 8% 11% 7% Current employees 23% 35% 14% Combination 33% 30% 14% Unsure 15% 12% 55%Total 100% 100% 100% BudgetDe fic it * Abe rc romb ie_Condensed C rosstabulation% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureBudgetDeficit Excise tax 18% 18% 11% Retirees 10% 8% 4% Current employees 24% 31% 20% Combination 35% 29% 20% Unsure 13% 15% 45%Total 100% 100% 100% BudgetDe fic it * Gender C rosstabu la tion% within Gender Gender Male FemaleBudgetDeficit Excise tax 15% 20% Retirees 9% 7% Current employees 28% 25% Combination 33% 32% Unsure 16% 17%Total 100% 100% BudgetDe fic it * Age_ Gro up C ross tabula tion% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+BudgetDeficit Excise tax 8% 20% 24% 16% 18% Retirees 8% 7% 8% 11% Current employees 18% 25% 30% 25% 26% Combination 21% 42% 30% 34% 30% Unsure 46% 13% 10% 16% 15%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 34 BudgetDe fic it * Race_ Ethnc ity C rosstabu la tion% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedBudgetDeficit Excise tax 17% 19% 10% 11% 21% 13% 27% Retirees 8% 9% 10% 8% 8% 25% 5% Current 31% 24% 25% 26% 26% 13% 19% employees Combination 36% 31% 24% 28% 38% 38% 29% Unsure 8% 16% 30% 26% 7% 13% 20%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% BudgetDe fic it * PhoneType C ross tabula tion% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineBudgetDeficit Excise tax 18% 16% 16% Retirees 7% 12% 14% Current employees 27% 22% 25% Combination 33% 31% 21% Unsure 14% 18% 23%Total 100% 100% 100% BudgetDe fic it * Po litics C ross tabula tio n% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureBudgetDeficit Excise tax 24% 17% 12% 16% Retirees 2% 9% 12% 11% Current 28% 29% 32% 10% employees Combination 35% 32% 32% 30% Unsure 10% 13% 12% 33%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% BudgetDe fic it * Pa rty_ID C ross tabula tion% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureBudgetDeficit Excise tax 22% 12% 15% 7% Retirees 6% 11% 10% 7% Current 23% 32% 30% 14% employees Combination 34% 31% 35% 11% Unsure 15% 15% 10% 61%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 35 BudgetDe fic it * Educa tion C ross tabula ti on% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeBudgetDeficit Excise tax 18% 18% 15% 21% Retirees 12% 6% 9% 10% Current employees 6% 24% 29% 26% Combination 6% 30% 35% 32% Unsure 59% 22% 12% 11%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% BudgetDe fic it * Re la tionsh ip Cross tabula tion% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedBudgetDeficit Excise tax 19% 4% 13% 22% 18% Retirees 6% 12% 9% 7% 18% Current employees 28% 40% 22% 32% 19% Combination 34% 20% 35% 30% 27% Unsure 14% 24% 21% 10% 18%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% BudgetDe fic it * Mi li ta ry_Fam ily C rosstabu lation% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoBudgetDeficit Excise tax 20% 17% Retirees 7% 9% Current employees 26% 26% Combination 31% 32% Unsure 16% 15%Total 100% 100% BudgetDe fic it * Un ion_Househo ld Cross tabu latio n% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoBudgetDeficit Excise tax 28% 13% Retirees 7% 9% Current employees 18% 30% Combination 30% 33% Unsure 16% 15%Total 100% 100%
  • 36 BudgetDe fic it * Income C rosstabu la tion% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreBudgetDeficit Excise tax 18% 17% 20% Retirees 10% 6% 9% Current employees 26% 23% 26% Combination 27% 39% 35% Unsure 18% 14% 9%Total 100% 100% 100% BudgetDe fic it * Vo ted2008 Cross tabu lation% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesBudgetDeficit Excise tax 9% 18% Retirees 9% 9% Current employees 22% 28% Combination 28% 31% Unsure 31% 14%Total 100% 100% BudgetDe fic it * Vo ted2010 Cross tabu lation% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesBudgetDeficit Excise tax 10% 18% Retirees 6% 10% Current employees 20% 28% Combination 35% 30% Unsure 28% 15%Total 100% 100%
  • 37PLDC PLDC * Obama_Condensed C ross tabula tion% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsurePLDC Abolish 27% 34% 10% Control 38% 30% 17% Leave alone 11% 14% 7% Doesnt matter 7% 11% 10% Unsure 17% 11% 57%Total 100% 100% 100% PLDC * Aberc ro mbie_Condensed C ross tabula tio n% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsurePLDC Abolish 22% 38% 13% Control 41% 30% 19% Leave alone 14% 10% 6% Doesnt matter 8% 7% 15% Unsure 14% 15% 48%Total 100% 100% 100% PLDC * Gender C ross tabula tion% within Gender Gender Male FemalePLDC Abolish 36% 22% Control 31% 39% Leave alone 13% 10% Doesnt matter 8% 8% Unsure 12% 21%Total 100% 100% PLDC * Age_G roup C ross tabula tion% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+PLDC Abolish 41% 25% 23% 28% 28% Control 8% 20% 39% 38% 40% Leave alone 15% 10% 17% 10% 11% Doesnt matter 10% 13% 4% 7% 8% Unsure 26% 32% 17% 17% 13%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 38 PLDC * Race_Ethnc i ty C ross tabula tion% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedPLDC Abolish 24% 37% 23% 35% 34% 25% 23% Control 47% 31% 28% 26% 30% 50% 32% Leave alone 9% 10% 13% 13% 13% 13% 16% Doesnt matter 7% 6% 14% 7% 7% 7% Unsure 12% 17% 23% 19% 16% 13% 21%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% PLDC * PhoneType C ross tabula ti on% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlinePLDC Abolish 28% 32% 28% Control 38% 28% 28% Leave alone 10% 19% 18% Doesnt matter 7% 12% 7% Unsure 18% 9% 19%Total 100% 100% 100% PLDC * Pol itics Cross tabula tion% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsurePLDC Abolish 35% 29% 28% 16% Control 35% 40% 37% 28% Leave alone 11% 14% 13% 7% Doesnt matter 5% 5% 7% 14% Unsure 13% 12% 15% 34%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% PLDC * Party_I D C ross tabula tion% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsurePLDC Abolish 27% 27% 34% 7% Control 40% 36% 33% 14% Leave alone 11% 15% 11% 4% Doesnt matter 6% 9% 7% 18% Unsure 16% 13% 14% 57%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 39 PLDC * Education Cross tabula tion% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreePLDC Abolish 6% 25% 31% 30% Control 24% 36% 37% 38% Leave alone 24% 12% 11% 11% Doesnt matter 12% 7% 8% 4% Unsure 35% 20% 14% 17%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% PLDC * Rela tionsh ip Cross tabu lation% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedPLDC Abolish 28% 35% 33% 18% 27% Control 37% 12% 27% 52% 41% Leave alone 12% 38% 11% 7% 6% Doesnt matter 6% 8% 9% 8% 10% Unsure 17% 8% 21% 15% 15%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% PLDC * Mi li ta ry_Fam ily C rosstabu la tion% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoPLDC Abolish 26% 28% Control 37% 36% Leave alone 8% 12% Doesnt matter 12% 6% Unsure 18% 17%Total 100% 100% PLDC * Union_Ho usehold C rosstabu lation% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoPLDC Abolish 27% 29% Control 37% 36% Leave alone 10% 12% Doesnt matter 9% 7% Unsure 18% 16%Total 100% 100%
  • 40 PLDC * Income C ross tabula tion% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MorePLDC Abolish 26% 28% 26% Control 33% 38% 42% Leave alone 14% 11% 12% Doesnt matter 9% 5% 7% Unsure 19% 17% 14%Total 100% 100% 100% PLDC * Voted2008 C rosstabu lation% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesPLDC Abolish 25% 29% Control 31% 36% Leave alone 9% 11% Doesnt matter 9% 7% Unsure 26% 17%Total 100% 100% PLDC * Voted2010 C rosstabu lation% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesPLDC Abolish 23% 30% Control 31% 35% Leave alone 10% 11% Doesnt matter 8% 7% Unsure 28% 17%Total 100% 100%
  • 41Rail Rail * Oba ma_Condensed C rosstabu lation% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureRail Support 46% 26% 36% Oppose 45% 66% 36% Doesnt Matter 6% 5% 10% Unsure 3% 3% 19%Total 100% 100% 100% Rail * Abe rc romb ie_Condensed C rosstabu lation% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureRail Support 47% 33% 34% Oppose 44% 60% 38% Doesnt Matter 7% 4% 13% Unsure 2% 4% 16%Total 100% 100% 100% Rail * Gende r C rosstabu lation% within Gender Gender Male FemaleRail Support 41% 40% Oppose 50% 51% Doesnt Matter 5% 6% Unsure 4% 3%Total 100% 100% Rail * Age_ Group C ross tabula tion% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+Rail Support 38% 42% 46% 45% 33% Oppose 54% 45% 49% 46% 57% Doesnt Matter 8% 4% 4% 7% Unsure 8% 5% 5% 3%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 42 Rail * Race_E thnc ity C rosstabu lation% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedRail Support 36% 40% 40% 33% 32% 29% 54% Oppose 55% 54% 44% 61% 58% 57% 34% Doesnt Matter 4% 5% 10% 4% 5% 14% 7% Unsure 4% 2% 6% 2% 5% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rail * PhoneType C rosstab ula tion% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineRail Support 40% 43% 34% Oppose 52% 47% 55% Doesnt Matter 5% 4% 7% Unsure 3% 6% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% Rail * Po li tics C ross tabula tion% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureRail Support 48% 39% 33% 39% Oppose 44% 52% 61% 46% Doesnt Matter 4% 7% 3% 8% Unsure 4% 2% 3% 7%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Rail * Pa rty_ID C rosstabu la tion% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureRail Support 49% 30% 34% 32% Oppose 42% 63% 57% 54% Doesnt Matter 5% 4% 7% 11% Unsure 4% 4% 3% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 43 Rail * Educa tio n C ross tabula tion% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeRail Support 50% 37% 42% 39% Oppose 31% 52% 51% 50% Doesnt Matter 13% 7% 4% 5% Unsure 6% 4% 2% 6%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Rail * Re lationsh ip C ross tabula ti on% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedRail Support 42% 38% 45% 35% 30% Oppose 50% 62% 43% 55% 60% Doesnt Matter 5% 8% 5% 6% Unsure 3% 5% 5% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rail * M i li tary_Fa mi ly Cross tabu lation% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoRail Support 41% 41% Oppose 47% 51% Doesnt Matter 5% 6% Unsure 8% 3%Total 100% 100% Rail * Un ion_Househo ld Cross tabu lation% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoRail Support 49% 37% Oppose 42% 54% Doesnt Matter 3% 7% Unsure 5% 3%Total 100% 100%
  • 44 Rail * Income C rosstabu lation% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreRail Support 41% 38% 49% Oppose 49% 52% 46% Doesnt Matter 8% 4% 2% Unsure 2% 5% 3%Total 100% 100% 100% Rail * Vo ted2008 Cross tabu lation% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesRail Support 47% 39% Oppose 39% 52% Doesnt Matter 8% 6% Unsure 6% 4%Total 100% 100% Rail * Vo ted2010 Cross tabu lation% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesRail Support 41% 39% Oppose 40% 52% Doesnt Matter 8% 5% Unsure 10% 3%Total 100% 100%
  • 45Obama Obama_Condensed * Gende r Cross tabu lation% within Gender Gender Male FemaleObama_Condensed Approve 62% 69% Disapprove 34% 26% Unsure 4% 6%Total 100% 100% Obama_Condensed * Age_G roup C rosstabu la tion% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+Obama_Condensed Approve 56% 65% 64% 67% 66% Disapprove 26% 32% 36% 27% 30% Unsure 18% 3% 7% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Obama_Condensed * Race_E thnci ty Cross tabu lation% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedObama_Condensed Approve 63% 74% 64% 66% 72% 43% 60% Disapprove 35% 22% 30% 25% 23% 57% 33% Unsure 2% 4% 6% 9% 5% 7%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Obama_Condensed * PhoneType C rosstabu lation% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineObama_Condensed Approve 65% 66% 75% Disapprove 31% 30% 18% Unsure 4% 4% 7%Total 100% 100% 100%
  • 46 Obama_Condensed * Po litics C rosstabu la tion% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureObama_Condensed Approve 91% 71% 33% 64% Disapprove 8% 27% 63% 21% Unsure 1% 2% 3% 15%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Obama_Condensed * Pa rty_ ID C rosstabu lation% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureObama_Condensed Approve 93% 27% 52% 34% Disapprove 5% 72% 42% 28% Unsure 2% 1% 6% 38%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Obama_Condensed * Educa tion C rosstabu la tion% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeObama_Condensed Approve 80% 67% 64% 65% Disapprove 13% 23% 33% 34% Unsure 7% 10% 3% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Obama_Condensed * Re lationship C ross tabula ti on% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedObama_Condensed Approve 67% 58% 61% 65% 69% Disapprove 30% 38% 31% 30% 26% Unsure 4% 4% 9% 5% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 47 Obama_Condensed * M il i tary_Fa mi ly Cross tabul ation% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoObama_Condensed Approve 65% 66% Disapprove 29% 30% Unsure 6% 5%Total 100% 100% Obama_Condensed * Un ion_Househo ld C ross tab ulation% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoObama_Condensed Approve 74% 63% Disapprove 23% 32% Unsure 3% 5%Total 100% 100% Obama_Condensed * Inco me Cross tabu lation% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreObama_Condensed Approve 64% 65% 73% Disapprove 29% 29% 26% Unsure 6% 5% 1%Total 100% 100% 100%
  • 48 Obama_Condensed * Vo ted2008 C ross tabula tio n% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesObama_Condensed Approve 66% 65% Disapprove 15% 31% Unsure 18% 4%Total 100% 100% Obama_Condensed * Vo ted2010 C ross tabula tio n% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesObama_Condensed Approve 70% 64% Disapprove 20% 31% Unsure 10% 6%Total 100% 100% Obama_Condensed * Abe rc romb ie_Condensed C rosstabu la tion% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureObama_Condensed Approve 83% 49% 48% Disapprove 15% 46% 16% Unsure 2% 5% 36%Total 100% 100% 100%
  • 49 Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Gende r Cross tabu lati on% within Gender Gender Male FemaleAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 48% 48% Disapprove 46% 45% Unsure 7% 7%Total 100% 100% Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Age_G roup C rosstab ulation% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+Abercrombie_Condensed Approve 41% 39% 54% 44% 52% Disapprove 36% 41% 44% 52% 43% Unsure 23% 20% 1% 4% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Race_E thnci ty Cross tabulation% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 51% 46% 53% 38% 50% 38% 44% Disapprove 43% 50% 39% 57% 48% 50% 42% Unsure 6% 4% 8% 6% 2% 13% 14% Aberc romb ie_Condensed * PhoneType C rosstab ulation% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 47% 49% 52% Disapprove 47% 40% 38% Unsure 5% 10% 11%Total 100% 100% 100%
  • 50Abercrombie Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Po li tics C rosstabu la ti on% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 66% 44% 36% 46% Disapprove 24% 54% 61% 41% Unsure 10% 2% 3% 14%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Pa rty_ ID C rosstabu la tion% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 60% 37% 39% 21% Disapprove 34% 61% 57% 38% Unsure 7% 3% 4% 41%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Educa tion C rosstabu l ation% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 69% 44% 50% 46% Disapprove 13% 46% 47% 48% Unsure 19% 10% 4% 6%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Re lationship C rossta bulation% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 46% 52% 41% 57% 51% Disapprove 46% 44% 49% 42% 44% Unsure 7% 4% 10% 2% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 51Aberc romb ie_Condensed * M il ita ry_Fa mi ly C ross tabula tion% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 47% 48% Disapprove 47% 46% Unsure 7% 7%Total 100% 100% Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Un ion_Househo ld Cross tabula tion% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 44% 49% Disapprove 51% 44% Unsure 5% 7%Total 100% 100% Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Inco me Cross tabu lati on% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 51% 46% 48% Disapprove 43% 48% 45% Unsure 6% 6% 7%Total 100% 100% 100%
  • 52 Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Vo ted2008 C ross tabulation% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 52% 48% Disapprove 33% 46% Unsure 15% 6%Total 100% 100% Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Vo ted2010 C ross tabul ation% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 55% 46% Disapprove 34% 47% Unsure 10% 7%Total 100% 100% Aberc romb ie_Condensed * Oba ma_Condensed C rosstabu la tion% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureAbercrombie_Condensed Approve 61% 25% 17% Disapprove 34% 70% 36% Unsure 6% 4% 48%Total 100% 100% 100%
  • 53New Senator Schatz * Obama_Con densed C ross tabula tion% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureSchatz Approve 50% 36% 28% Disapprove 32% 45% 36% Unsure 18% 19% 36%Total 100% 100% 100% Schatz * Aberc ro mbie_Condensed C ross tabula ti on% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureSchatz Approve 55% 36% 31% Disapprove 26% 50% 15% Unsure 19% 14% 54%Total 100% 100% 100% Schatz * Gender C ross tabula tion% within Gender Gender Male FemaleSchatz Approve 42% 47% Disapprove 43% 32% Unsure 16% 21%Total 100% 100% Schatz * Age_G roup Cross tabula tion% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+Schatz Approve 26% 37% 42% 42% 53% Disapprove 44% 42% 47% 38% 29% Unsure 31% 20% 11% 20% 18%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 54 Schatz * Race_Ethnc i ty C ross tabula tion% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedSchatz Approve 54% 43% 34% 30% 46% 25% 39% Disapprove 27% 37% 43% 55% 41% 63% 39% Unsure 19% 20% 23% 15% 13% 13% 23%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Schatz * PhoneType C ross tabula tion% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineSchatz Approve 46% 34% 40% Disapprove 37% 43% 32% Unsure 17% 22% 28%Total 100% 100% 100% Schatz * Pol itics Cross tabu lation% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureSchatz Approve 60% 47% 33% 29% Disapprove 25% 41% 49% 32% Unsure 15% 12% 18% 39%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Schatz * Party_I D C ross tabula ti on% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureSchatz Approve 52% 29% 46% 14% Disapprove 34% 51% 37% 25% Unsure 15% 20% 18% 61%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 55 Schatz * Education Cross tabu lation% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeSchatz Approve 31% 32% 46% 54% Disapprove 19% 45% 38% 30% Unsure 50% 23% 16% 16%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Schatz * Rela tionsh ip Crosstabu lation% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedSchatz Approve 46% 50% 30% 48% 43% Disapprove 36% 38% 51% 28% 35% Unsure 18% 12% 18% 23% 22%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Schatz * Mi li ta ry_Fam ily C rosstabu la tion% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoSchatz Approve 23% 48% Disapprove 55% 34% Unsure 23% 18%Total 100% 100% Schatz * Union_H ousehold C rosstabu lation% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoSchatz Approve 45% 43% Disapprove 42% 36% Unsure 13% 21%Total 100% 100%
  • 56 Schatz * Inco me C ross tabula tion% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreSchatz Approve 41% 40% 56% Disapprove 38% 41% 32% Unsure 21% 19% 12%Total 100% 100% 100% Schatz * Voted2008 C rosstabu lation% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesSchatz Approve 39% 47% Disapprove 38% 35% Unsure 23% 18%Total 100% 100% Schatz * Voted2010 C rosstabu lation% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesSchatz Approve 35% 48% Disapprove 40% 35% Unsure 26% 17%Total 100% 100%
  • 57 SenateCho ices * Obama_Condensed C rossta bula tion% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureSenateChoices Schatz 36% 38% 24% Hanabusa 44% 19% 27% Kaiaina 5% 11% 5% Unsure 15% 32% 43%Total 100% 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Aberc rom bie_Condensed C ross tabula tion% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureSenateChoices Schatz 42% 32% 21% Hanabusa 38% 36% 19% Kaiaina 6% 8% 4% Unsure 14% 24% 56%Total 100% 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Gender C rosstab ula tion% within Gender Gender Male FemaleSenateChoices Schatz 34% 37% Hanabusa 37% 35% Kaiaina 8% 6% Unsure 21% 22%Total 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Age_G roup C ross tabula ti on% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+SenateChoices Schatz 21% 25% 34% 34% 42% Hanabusa 56% 37% 36% 37% 31% Kaiaina 3% 5% 9% 8% Unsure 23% 34% 24% 20% 18%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 58 SenateCho ices * Race_Ethnc ity C ross tabula tion% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedSenateChoices Schatz 48% 30% 27% 17% 34% 38% 30% Hanabusa 29% 40% 42% 43% 48% 25% 32% Kaiaina 4% 10% 5% 19% 5% 13% 9% Unsure 19% 20% 26% 21% 13% 25% 30%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Ph oneType C ross tabula tion% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineSenateChoices Schatz 37% 32% 25% Hanabusa 35% 40% 43% Kaiaina 7% 7% 9% Unsure 21% 21% 23%Total 100% 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Po litics C ross tabula tion% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureSenateChoices Schatz 41% 39% 32% 25% Hanabusa 38% 35% 30% 46% Kaiaina 3% 10% 10% 5% Unsure 18% 16% 28% 24%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Pa rty_ID C ross tabula tion% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureSenateChoices Schatz 35% 33% 38% 18% Hanabusa 48% 27% 26% 25% Kaiaina 3% 12% 12% Unsure 13% 28% 23% 57%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 59 SenateCho ices * Ed ucation C ross tabula tion% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeSenateChoices Schatz 6% 26% 36% 45% Hanabusa 44% 46% 37% 24% Kaiaina 13% 6% 6% 10% Unsure 38% 22% 20% 20%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Rela tionsh ip Cross tabu lation% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedSenateChoices Schatz 38% 42% 20% 37% 36% Hanabusa 35% 31% 48% 30% 36% Kaiaina 7% 15% 8% 8% 6% Unsure 20% 12% 25% 25% 21%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Mi li ta ry_Fam ily C rosstabu lation% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoSenateChoices Schatz 22% 37% Hanabusa 47% 35% Kaiaina 7% 8% Unsure 25% 20%Total 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Union_Househo ld C rosstabu lation% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoSenateChoices Schatz 38% 34% Hanabusa 38% 36% Kaiaina 5% 8% Unsure 19% 22%Total 100% 100%
  • 60 SenateCho ices * Income C rosstab ula tion% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreSenateChoices Schatz 28% 35% 43% Hanabusa 43% 35% 35% Kaiaina 10% 5% 7% Unsure 19% 25% 16%Total 100% 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Vo ted2008 C rosstabu lation% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesSenateChoices Schatz 20% 39% Hanabusa 47% 34% Kaiaina 8% 6% Unsure 25% 20%Total 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Vo ted2010 C rosstabu lation% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesSenateChoices Schatz 23% 39% Hanabusa 48% 33% Kaiaina 4% 7% Unsure 26% 21%Total 100% 100%
  • 61 InouyeLette r * Obama_Condensed C ross tabula ti on% within Obama_Condensed Obama_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureInouyeLetter Approve 35% 28% 25% Disapprove 43% 53% 25% Unsure 22% 20% 50%Total 100% 100% 100% InouyeLette r * Aberc ro mbie_Condensed C ross tabulation% within Abercrombie_Condensed Abercrombie_Condensed Approve Disapprove UnsureInouyeLetter Approve 32% 36% 13% Disapprove 48% 44% 33% Unsure 20% 20% 54%Total 100% 100% 100% InouyeLette r * Gender C ross tabula tion% within Gender Gender Male FemaleInouyeLetter Approve 34% 32% Disapprove 47% 43% Unsure 19% 25%Total 100% 100% InouyeLette r * Age_G roup C ross tabula tion% within Age_Group Age_Group 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+InouyeLetter Approve 50% 25% 48% 30% 29% Disapprove 34% 45% 36% 48% 48% Unsure 16% 30% 15% 22% 23%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 62 InouyeLette r * Race_Ethnc ity C ross tabula tion% within Race_Ethncity Race_Ethncity Caucasian Japanese Filipino Hawaiian Chinese Hispanic/Latino Other/MixedInouyeLetter Approve 27% 34% 39% 32% 43% 13% 36% Disapprove 55% 43% 30% 51% 35% 63% 41% Unsure 18% 22% 31% 17% 22% 25% 22%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% InouyeLette r * PhoneType C ross tabula ti on% within PhoneType PhoneType Both Cell LandlineInouyeLetter Approve 33% 31% 33% Disapprove 46% 55% 33% Unsure 21% 13% 33%Total 100% 100% 100% InouyeLette r * Pol itics Cross tabula tion% within Politics Politics Liberal/Progressive Moderate Conservative UnsureInouyeLetter Approve 35% 31% 30% 37% Disapprove 46% 50% 50% 29% Unsure 19% 19% 20% 34%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% InouyeLette r * Party_I D C ross tabula tion% within Party_ID Party_ID Democrat Republican Independent UnsureInouyeLetter Approve 40% 28% 27% 21% Disapprove 40% 59% 50% 21% Unsure 20% 13% 23% 59%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • 63 InouyeLette r * Education Cross tabula tion% within Education Education High No School College Graduate degree Degree Degree DegreeInouyeLetter Approve 33% 39% 35% 23% Disapprove 47% 38% 44% 55% Unsure 20% 23% 21% 22%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% InouyeLette r * Rela tionsh ip Cross tabu lation% within Relationship Relationship Married Partner Single Div/Sep WidowedInouyeLetter Approve 33% 19% 39% 33% 30% Disapprove 45% 69% 37% 50% 43% Unsure 22% 12% 24% 17% 27%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% InouyeLette r * Mi li ta ry_Fam ily C rosstabu la tion% within Military_Family Military_Family Yes NoInouyeLetter Approve 33% 33% Disapprove 44% 46% Unsure 23% 22%Total 100% 100% InouyeLette r * Union_Househ old C rosstabu lation% within Union_Household Union_Household Yes NoInouyeLetter Approve 34% 32% Disapprove 44% 46% Unsure 22% 21%Total 100% 100%
  • 64 InouyeLette r * Income C ross tabula tion% within Income Income $50,000 $50,000- $100,000 or Less $100,000 or MoreInouyeLetter Approve 38% 31% 32% Disapprove 42% 44% 52% Unsure 20% 24% 15%Total 100% 100% 100% InouyeLette r * Voted2008 C rosstabu lation% within Voted2008 Voted2008 No YesInouyeLetter Approve 42% 31% Disapprove 32% 46% Unsure 27% 23%Total 100% 100% InouyeLette r * Voted2010 C rosstabu lation% within Voted2010 Voted2010 No YesInouyeLetter Approve 41% 30% Disapprove 27% 48% Unsure 32% 22%Total 100% 100%
  • 65 Schatz * SenateCho ices Cross tabu lation% within SenateChoices SenateChoices Schatz Hanabusa Kaiaina UnsureSchatz Approve 89% 18% 30% 20% Disapprove 5% 64% 57% 37% Unsure 7% 17% 13% 44%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Schatz * InouyeLe tte r Crosstabu lation% within InouyeLetter InouyeLetter Approve Disapprove UnsureSchatz Approve 29% 57% 41% Disapprove 54% 30% 25% Unsure 17% 12% 34%Total 100% 100% 100% SenateCho ices * Scha tz Cross tabu lation% within Schatz Schatz Approve Disapprove UnsureSenateChoices Schatz 71% 4% 13% Hanabusa 15% 63% 33% Kaiaina 5% 11% 5% Unsure 10% 22% 50%Total 100% 100% 100% SenateCho ices * InouyeLe tte r Cross tabu lation% within InouyeLetter InouyeLetter Approve Disapprove UnsureSenateChoices Schatz 19% 49% 34% Hanabusa 66% 21% 23% Kaiaina 5% 9% 6% Unsure 10% 22% 37%Total 100% 100% 100%
  • 66 InouyeLette r * Schatz Crosstabu lation% within Schatz Schatz Approve Disapprove UnsureInouyeLetter Approve 21% 48% 30% Disapprove 58% 37% 30% Unsure 21% 15% 40%Total 100% 100% 100% InouyeLette r * SenateCho ices Cross tabu lation% within SenateChoices SenateChoices Schatz Hanabusa Kaiaina UnsureInouyeLetter Approve 17% 60% 22% 16% Disapprove 61% 26% 59% 46% Unsure 21% 14% 20% 39%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%