Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Auxiliary
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Auxiliary

1,057

Published on

How to implement auxiliary verbs in HPSG.

How to implement auxiliary verbs in HPSG.

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,057
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
53
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. AUXILIARY V ERBS BASIC A NALYSIS OF AUXILIARY V ERBS IN HPSG Maria Cieschinger, Anton Flügge, Hannes Schulz, Claudia Thiessen University of Osnabrück, Department of Cognitive Science Feb 1st , 2005 Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 1 / 19
  • 2. O UTLINE 1 F EATURES OF AUXILIARIES 2 AUXILIARIES IN HPSG Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 2 / 19
  • 3. W HY ARE AUXILIARIES I NTERESTING ? Most extensively analyzed, because: In all languages (→ Universal Grammar) Closed word class Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 3 / 19
  • 4. W HAT ARE AUXILIARIES ? Express notions of H ELPING WORDS Time (will) Be, do, have Necessity (must) M ODALS Possibility (could) Can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will, would Obligation (should) Permission (may) ... Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 4 / 19
  • 5. F EATURES OF AUXILIARIES E XAMPLE : AUXILIARIES Kim could have been attending the reception. Optionality M ORE E XAMPLES Determination of form of Kim could have attended. . . following verb Kim could attend. . . Precedence of non-aux verb Kim attends. . . Possibility of coocurrence (fixed order) * Kim could have being. . . No iteration of auxiliaries of * Kim could have been attend. . . given type Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 5 / 19
  • 6. F EATURES OF AUXILIARIES E XAMPLE : AUXILIARIES Kim could have been attending the reception. Optionality M ORE E XAMPLES Determination of form of Kim could have attended. . . following verb Kim could attend_. . . Precedence of non-aux verb Kim attends. . . Possibility of coocurrence (fixed order) * Kim could have being. . . No iteration of auxiliaries of * Kim could have been attend. . . given type Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 5 / 19
  • 7. F EATURES OF AUXILIARIES E XAMPLE : AUXILIARIES Kim could have been attending the reception. Optionality M ORE E XAMPLES Determination of form of * Kim attending . . . could have. following verb * Kim could attending . . . been. Precedence of non-aux verb Possibility of coocurrence (fixed order) No iteration of auxiliaries of given type Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 5 / 19
  • 8. F EATURES OF AUXILIARIES E XAMPLE : AUXILIARIES Kim could have been attending the reception. Optionality M ORE E XAMPLES Determination of form of * Kim have could been. . . following verb * Kim been have could. . . Precedence of non-aux verb * Kim could been have. . . Possibility of coocurrence (fixed order) No iteration of auxiliaries of given type Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 5 / 19
  • 9. F EATURES OF AUXILIARIES E XAMPLE : AUXILIARIES Kim could have been attending the reception. Optionality M ORE E XAMPLES Determination of form of * Kim could would have been. . . following verb * Kim could have had been. . . Precedence of non-aux verb * Kim could have been being. . . Possibility of coocurrence (fixed order) No iteration of auxiliaries of given type Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 5 / 19
  • 10. C HOMSKY ’ S CFG CFG-RULE E XAMPLE S → NP AUX VP; AUX → (M)(PERF)(PROG) S NP AUX VP Kim M PERF PROG attending the reception could have been Problem: No account for determination of form of following verb and not compatible with HPSG structures. Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 6 / 19
  • 11. F EATURES OF AUXILIARIES E XAMPLE : AUXILIARIES Kim could have been attending the reception. Optionality M ORE E XAMPLES Determination of form of Kim could have attended. . . following verb Kim could attend. . . Precedence of non-aux verb Kim attends. . . Possibility of coocurrence (fixed order) * Kim could have being. . . No iteration of auxiliaries of * Kim could have been attend. . . given type Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 7 / 19
  • 12. O PTIONALITY verb-lxm   srv-lxm srv-lxm        ARG-ST SPR 1   1,     COMPS ic-srv-lxm auxv-lxm   auxv-lxm     SYN HEAD AUX + But what about the following verbs form? * Kim could have attending Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 8 / 19
  • 13. O PTIONALITY verb-lxm   srv-lxm srv-lxm        ARG-ST SPR 1   1,     COMPS ic-srv-lxm auxv-lxm   auxv-lxm     SYN HEAD AUX + But what about the following verbs form? * Kim could have attending Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 8 / 19
  • 14. F EATURES OF AUXILIARIES E XAMPLE : AUXILIARIES Kim could have been attending the reception. Optionality M ORE E XAMPLES Determination of form of Kim could have attended. . . following verb Kim could attend_. . . Precedence of non-aux verb Kim attends. . . Possibility of coocurrence (fixed order) * Kim could have being. . . No iteration of auxiliaries of * Kim could have been attend. . . given type Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 9 / 19
  • 15. D ETERMINATION OF F ORM OF F OLLOWING V ERB Specification of complement VP in the lexical entry: 2 3 auxv-lxm auxv-lxm 2 3 6SYN [HEAD [FORM fin]] 7 6 2 2 3 3 7 6 6 7 6 6 verb 7 7 2 2 3 7 33 7 6HEAD 6AUX + 7 6 2 6 6 6 7 7 7 6 6 * 6 verb 7 7 7 6 6SYN 6 4 5 7 7 7 7 6 7+ 6SYN 6HEAD 6INF - AGR 0 6 77 7 7 6 6 7 7 6 6 7 7 6ARG-ST X, 6 6 4 4 57 7 5 7 6 4 5 7 FORM base 7 7 * 6 7 + 6 7 VAL [SPR <[AGR 0 ]>] 6 6 6 7 6 4 5 7 can, 6 7 6 7 6 SEM [INDEX s2 ] 7 * 6 6 2 2 3 7 3 7 + HEAD [PRED +] 6 7 be, 6 6 7 6 7 INDEX s1 6 2 3 7 * 6 quot; 7 7 # + 6 7 6 6SYN 6 7 7 SPR <3> 7 7 6 6 7 3, 6 6 2 3 7 7 6ARG-ST 6 4VAL 7 5 7 6 * RELN can + 7 6 7 7 COMPS <> 6 7 6 6SEM 6 6 7 7 6 6 7 7 7 4SIT s1 5 5 6 6RESTR 6 7 7 7 6 4 5 7 SEM [INDEX s] 4 4 5 6 7 ARG s2 6 7 6 7 6 2 3 7 2 3 6 6 MODE prop 7 7 auxv-lxm 4SEM 6 6 4INDEX s 7 5 7 5 RESTR <> 6 2 2 quot; #3 7 3 6 7 6SYN 4HEAD verb 6 * +7 6 7 5 7 6ARG-ST 6 X, 6 6 FORM psp 7 7 7 7 E XAMPLE * 6 4 5 7+ 6 7 6 SEM [INDEX s2 ] 7 have, 6 6 7 7 INDEX s1 Kim could have been attending the 6 2 3 7 6 7 6 6 2 3 7 7 * RELN have + reception. 6 6 7 7 6SEM 6 6 7 7 7 4SIT s1 5 5 6 6RESTR 6 7 7 7 4 4 5 ARG s2 Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 10 / 19
  • 16. F EATURES OF AUXILIARIES E XAMPLE : AUXILIARIES Kim could have been attending the reception. Optionality M ORE E XAMPLES Determination of form of * Kim attending . . . could have. following verb * Kim could attending . . . been. Precedence of non-aux verb Possibility of coocurrence (fixed order) No iteration of auxiliaries of given type Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 11 / 19
  • 17. P RECEDENCE OF N ON -AUX V ERB Why do auxiliary verbs always precede the non-auxiliary verb? Verbs do not take AUX as complements AUX are no modifiers AUX do take verbs as complements Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 12 / 19
  • 18. F EATURES OF AUXILIARIES E XAMPLE : AUXILIARIES Kim could have been attending the reception. Optionality M ORE E XAMPLES Determination of form of * Kim have could been. . . following verb * Kim been have could. . . Precedence of non-aux verb * Kim could been have. . . Possibility of coocurrence (fixed order) No iteration of auxiliaries of given type Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 13 / 19
  • 19. P OSSIBILITY OF C OOCURRENCE IN F IXED O RDER E XAMPLE SENTENCE Kim could have been attending the reception. 2 3 auxv-lxm 6SYN [HEAD [FORM fin]] 6 7 7 6 2 2 33 7 6 2 3 7 6 6 verb 7 6 * 6 6 6SYN 6HEAD 6INF 77+7 777 7 6 4 - 557 7 6ARG-ST X,6 6 4 7 7 * 6 6 6 FORM base 7 7+ 4 5 7 can, 6 6 7 6 SEM [INDEX s2 ] 7 7 6 2 3 7 6 7 6 6 INDEX s1 7 7 6 6 2 7 3 7 7 6 6 * RELN can +7 7 6SEM 6 6 7 7 6 6 6RESTR 4SIT 6 s1 5 7 7 7 7 4 4 5 5 ARG s2 Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 14 / 19
  • 20. P OSSIBILITY OF C OOCURRENCE IN F IXED O RDER E XAMPLE SENTENCE Kim could have been attending the reception. 2 3 auxv-lxm 6 2 7 6 2 quot; #33 7 6SYN 4HEAD verb 6 * +7 6 57 7 6 7 6ARG-ST X,6 6 FORM psp 7 7 7 7 6 4 5 7+ * 6 6 SEM [INDEX s2 ] 7 have, 6 6 7 2 3 7 INDEX s1 6 7 6 7 6 6 7 7 6 2 3 7 7 6 6 * RELN have +7 7 6SEM 6 6 7 7 6 6 6RESTR 4SIT 6 s1 5 7 7 7 7 4 5 ARG s2 4 5 Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 14 / 19
  • 21. P OSSIBILITY OF C OOCURRENCE IN F IXED O RDER E XAMPLE SENTENCE Kim could have been attending the reception. 2 3 auxv-lxm 6 2 2 3 3 7 6 6 verb 7 7 6 7 6HEAD 4AUX + 5 6 6 7 7 6 7 7 6SYN 6 7 7 6 6 6 4 AGR 0 7 5 7 7 6 7 6 6 VAL [SPR <[AGR 0 ]>] 7 7 * 6 2 2 3 7+ 3 7 6 6 HEAD [PRED +] 7 be, 6 * 6 6 quot; #77+7 6 6 6SYN 6 SPR < 3 > 77 7 7 6ARG-ST 3, 6 4VAL 57 7 COMPS <> 6 6 7 7 6 6 7 7 6 4 5 7 6 6 SEM [INDEX s] 7 7 6 2 3 7 6 7 6 6 MODE prop 7 7 6SEM 4INDEX s 5 6 7 7 4 5 RESTR <> Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 14 / 19
  • 22. P OSSIBILITY OF C OOCURRENCE IN F IXED O RDER E XAMPLE SENTENCE Kim could have been attending the reception. Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 14 / 19
  • 23. F EATURES OF AUXILIARIES E XAMPLE : AUXILIARIES Kim could have been attending the reception. Optionality M ORE E XAMPLES Determination of form of * Kim could would have been. . . following verb * Kim could have had been. . . Precedence of non-aux verb * Kim could have been being. . . Possibility of coocurrence (fixed order) No iteration of auxiliaries of given type Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 15 / 19
  • 24. N O I TERATION E XAMPLE S[fin] Kim VP[fin] Iteration is not possible: form of following verb VP[base] quot; # given FORM fin AUX + following form always different from current VP[psp] quot; # FORM base could AUX + one VP[prp] quot; # FORM psp have AUX + attending the office been Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 16 / 19
  • 25. S UMMARY Features of auxiliaries can be represented in HPSG. Cieschinger, Flügge, Schulz, Thiessen (UOS) Auxiliary Verbs Seminar Syntax, Group 8 17 / 19
  • 26. N O I TERATION E XAMPLE S[fin] Kim VP[fin] VP[base] quot; # FORM fin AUX + VP[psp] quot; # FORM base could AUX +
  • 27. N O I TERATION VP[base] quot; # FORM fin AUX + VP[psp] quot; # FORM base could AUX + VP[prp] quot; # FORM psp have AUX + attending the office been
  • 28. D ETERMINATION OF F ORM OF F OLLOWING V ERB Specification of complement VP in the lex 2 auxv-lxm au 2 3 6SYN [HEAD [FORM fin]] 7 6 6 6 7 6 6 2 2 3 7 3 7 6 6 2 3 6 6 verb 7 6 6SY * 6 6SYN 6HEAD 6INF 77 7 7+ - 6 6 77 7 6 4 57 7 6 6ARG-ST X, 6 6 4 5 7 6 FORM base 7 7 * 6 7 + 6 6 6 6 6 4 5 7 can, 6 7 6 6 6 SEM [INDEX s2 ] 7 7 * 6 6 be, 6 6 7 6 INDEX s1 6 2 3 7 6 7 6 6 7 6 6 6 2 * RELN can + 3 7 7 6AR 6 7 6 6SEM 6 6 7 7 7 7 6 4SIT s1 5 5 6 6RESTR 6 7 7 6 4 4 5 6 ARG s2 6 6 6 6 2 3 6 auxv-lxm 6SE 4 6 2 2 quot; 3 #3 7 6 7 6SYN 4HEAD verb 6 * +7 6 57 7
  • 29. 6 6 7 7 6 6 4 5 7 D ETERMINATION OF F ORM OF F OLLOWING V ERB 6 7 6 6 7 * 6 6 7 6 be, 6 6 7 6 INDEX s1 6 2 3 7 6 7 6 6 7 6 6 6 2 * RELN can + 3 7 7 6AR 6 7 6 6SEM 6 6 7 7 6 7 6RESTR SIT s1 5 7 6 6 7 7 6 4 4 4 5 5 6 ARG s2 6 6 6 6 2 3 6 auxv-lxm 6SE 4 6 2 2 quot; #3 7 3 6 7 6SYN 4HEAD verb 6 * +7 6 7 5 7 6ARG-ST 6 X, 6 6 FORM psp 7 77 7 E 6 4 5 7 * 6 6 SEM [INDEX s2 ] 7 7 + XAM have, 6 6 7 7 INDEX s1 Kim c 6 2 3 7 6 7 6 6 2 3 7 7 * RELN have + recep 6 6 7 7 6SEM 6 6 7 7 7 4SIT s1 5 7 6 6RESTR 6 7 7 4 4 5 5 ARG s2
  • 30. D ETERMINATION OF F ORM OF F OLLOWING V ERB 2 3 auxv-lxm 3 7 6 2 2 3 3 7 7 6 6 verb 7 7 3 7 3 6HEAD 6AUX + 7 3 7 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7+ 6SYN 6 4 5 7 7 AGR 0 77 7 7 7 6 6 7 7 57 5 7 6 6 7 7 7 + 6 4 5 7 6 7 VAL [SPR <[AGR 0 ]>] 7 7 6 7 5 7 6 7 7 7 * 6 2 2 3 7 3 7+ 6 HEAD [PRED +] 7 be, 6 7 6 7 7 * 6 quot; #7 7 7+ 7 6 6SYN 6 7 7 7 7 6 6ARG-ST 3, 6 6 4VAL SPR <3> 7 7 7 5 7 6 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 COMPS <> 7 7 7 6 4 5 7 SEM [INDEX s] 5 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 2 3 7 3 6 6 MODE prop 7 7 6SEM 4INDEX s 6 7 7 4 5 5 3 7 RESTR <> 3 7 +7 7 5 7 7 7 7 7

×