60 years is enough … e-stas conference: GlobalGiving Mari Kuraishi March 2007
… to dramatically change the way international development is done
When the first post-colonial development institutions were established 60 years ago…
Staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development departed on “missions” by ocean liner
50 years later, anyone with a computer, camera, and internet connection can “meet” anyone else with the same
But it required the World Bank to adapt …
Technology is intended to make existing processes more efficient, while keeping existing power relationships intact
But the drive for efficiency puts tools and access unintentionally at everyone’s fingertips
E.g., World Bank use of information technology Everyone in the office is issued one, no controls attempted Computer and internet connection E-mail Attempted control over Knowledge Management Computer and internet connection web Every professional issued one, control only through business process (clearances required) but much harder to enforce Proprietary internal address system “ All-in-one” One fax machine per division, physical access limited Phone line and fax machine Fax 1 telex machine per institution, specialized know-how to code Specialized machine, station-to-station, coded Telex
Shifting sands on the ground …
Quickly verifiable information flowing freely to many more outlets has led to real behavioral change
Experts from the North used to tell governments of the South what had to be done
Now local social entrepreneurs can mobilize communities to define their own problems and solutions
Change/economic growth happens when:
Shifts in “classical” technology
Accompanied by behavioral shifts—advances in social technology
Combined with a mechanism for allowing differentiation, selection, and replication of successful innovations*
* Eric Beinhocker's The Origin of Wealth
Technology can make all parts of the supply chain more efficient
Payment processing
1996 Booz Allen Hamilton survey to calculate the average cost of different types of bank transactions:
Online transaction: $.01
ATM transaction: $.27
Telephone transaction: $.54
Branch Transaction: $1.07
2006 (the nonprofit sector lagging 10 years behind), Network for Good data on average costs per type of donation:
Online Donation: $.05
Telephone Donation: $.63
Direct mail solicitation: $1.25
Kaligathuk School project
Situation: $6,000 keeps 150-student school going. $40 per student
Goal: $3,000 from friends/ family + Match = $6,000
Result = $12,200 w/ 37% conversion rate
Result = 2 Schools funded
Technology can make things far away more intimate
But there are very many different ways to apply technological advances, and it’s hard to know ex ante what will make a difference or how
In other words, technology is meaningless without understanding how it has changed the ways in which value can be captured
Who knew, for instance, that technology is at the heart of the Starbucks experience, or the rise in US infant mortality?
Technology brings you the Starbucks experience everywhere
e.g ., Many ubiquitous brands with very many retail storefronts are operated as franchises: McDonald’s
Starbucks is not a franchise model--it uses technology to achieve that uniform customer experience in so many retail outlets:
Starbucks HQ knows when a cash register has been continuously busy for a certain number of minutes, and will call the store to prompt them to open a second register
Unexpected outcomes: Technology and US infant mortality
US infant mortality rates are tied with Malta and Slovakia for the second-worst infant-mortality rate among developed nations
From 1/3 to 1/2 of infant mortality in the US is ascribed to premature birth
Better and more affordable medical care actually has worsened the rate of prematurity, and likely the rate of infant mortality, by making fertility treatment widespread the numbers of women using assistive reproductive technology doubled from 1996 to 2002
Cambrian explosion, or waste?
So there is no question technology can make things more efficient
But it’s not always clear how they will change social technology--look at the following current developments
What some observers bemoan as duplication and “waste”
Can also be the “Cambrian explosion” that maximizes the chance that a useful innovation will emerge
Current example: Social networking + social activism and development
They are at various stages of development
They all seek to bring social consciousness to community sites
They have different features, different “hooks”
On the downside, a majority of these sites will fail to reach critical mass
On the upside, almost all the features they are experimenting with, if they are successful, will be adopted somewhere …
Vision and Mission of GlobalGiving
Vision : Unleash the potential of people around the world to make positive change happen
Mission : Build an efficient, open, thriving marketplace that connects people who have community and world-changing ideas with people who can support them
At GlobalGiving, we’ve incorporated the following to try and plant the seeds for changes in social technology:
Project initiatives proposed from communities
Voted on by their stakeholders and potential donors
Monitored and reported on by project leaders, volunteers, donors
“ one of the best methods to allow the people to decide globally on what they regard most important in terms of development needs” - Stephen E., UK “ very innovative way to evaluate projects” - David O., US “ I admire the work done here to enable projects access to a source of funding” - Ellen S., Israel “ What a great idea opening up the area of long term development aid to a new audience and making it fun.” - Kristy S., UK “ A great way to collaborate with folks you never knew about. Thanks for helping us share” - Barbara S., US “ thank you for the opportunity to participate” - Lynn C., Canada
Updates Evaluation Feedback - Supporting Poor Families Affected by HIV/AIDS in Kenya -
Start trusting individual social entrepreneurs Nominate Mohammed Yunus Albina Ruiz Her track record to reflect on his track record
Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Tools
For this and other viral tools, magic is in how to make easy and scaleable
Ads easily ported to MySpace, Blogger, other “home pages”
E-mail-enabled video “ask” tools
Fundraising widget/badge for each project
Partnerships with networking sites
Tools for individuals and companies
Questions:
Do you agree? Disagree?
How far can/should we push on encouraging changes in social technology? Most of the things GlobalGiving is doing has precedence in the private sector: eBay, HotOrNot, Pop Idol …
Should we at GlobalGiving or the sector at large be more leading edge?
0 comments
Post a comment