Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Trial data management application 10 july 2011 v esri

1,374

Published on

Presentation by Glenn Hyman and Ernesto Giron on agricultural trial database for climate change adaptation planning, at the 2011 ESRI International User Conference in San Diego, CA, July 14th, 2011

Presentation by Glenn Hyman and Ernesto Giron on agricultural trial database for climate change adaptation planning, at the 2011 ESRI International User Conference in San Diego, CA, July 14th, 2011

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,374
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Theme 1: the big picture
  • For Lobell map: Values show the linear trend in temperature for the main crop grown in that grid cell, and for the months in which that crop is grown. Values indicate the trend in terms of multiples of the standard deviation of historical year-to-year variation. ** A 1˚C rise tended to lower yields by up to 10% except in high latitude countries, where in particular rice gains from warming.** In India, warming may explain the recently slowing of yield gains. For yield graph: Estimated net impact of climate trends for 1980-2008 on crop yields for major producers and for global production. Values are expressed as percent of average yield. Gray bars show median estimate and error bars show 5-95% confidence interval from bootstrap resampling with 500 replicates. Red and blue dots show median estimate of impact for T trend and P trend, respectively. **At the global scale, maize and wheat exhibited negative impacts for several major producers and global net loss of 3.8% and 5.5% relative to what would have been achieved without the climate trends in 1980-2008. In absolute terms, these equal the annual production of maize in Mexico (23 MT) and wheat in France (33 MT), respectively.Source:Climate Trends and Global Crop Production Since 1980David B. Lobell1,*, Wolfram Schlenker2,3, and Justin Costa-Roberts1Science magazine
  • The climate analogue tool identifies the range of places whose current climates correspond to the future of a chosen locality. Potential for :- testing/validation ‘climate proofed’ technology Knowledge exchange (Farms of the future project: cross-site farmer visits) and participatory crop and livestock trials
  • Example of analogue sites
  • CCAFS is investing in a large multi-purpose repository of multi-site agricultural trial information, and now looks to develop methods for analyzing this data to understand varietal response through genotype by environment (GxE) analyses. The methods developed under this consultancy will then be used for training developing country scientists and to develop a community of data analysts looking at varietal response for a whole range of crops.
  • AMKN is a portal for accessing and sharing agricultural A&M knowledge.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Agricultural technology evaluation: Trial metadatabaseand file repository
      http://agtrials.org/
    • 2. http://agtrials.org
    • 3. (c) Neil Palmer (CIAT)
      Importance & Potential
      Collating input climate and agricultural data
      Design of experiments
      Calibration, validation and crop model runs
      • Exploration of adaptation options
      • 4. Genetic improvement
      • 5. On-farm management practices
      • 6. Test them via modelling
      • 7. Build “adaptation packages”
      • 8. Assess technology transfer options
    • Historical impacts on food security
      Observed changes in growing season temperature for crop growing regions,1980-2008.
      Lobell et al (2011)
      % Yield impact
      for wheat
    • 9. >> Multi-site agricultural trial database (agtrials.org)
      Effect of +1ºC warming on yield
      Sites with >23ºC would suffer even if optimally managed
      20,000+ maize trials in 123 research sites
      More than 20% loss in sites with >20ºC, under drought
      Lobell et al. 2011
    • 10. >> Multi-site agricultural trial database (agtrials.org)
      New data in 2011
      • Over 3,000 trials
      • 11. 16 crops
      • 12. 20 countries
      • 13. > 15 international and national institutions
    • Trial sites and trials
    • 14. Bean trial data
    • 15. Rice trial data
    • 16. Web Application Framework
      Clients
      Server
      Data Base
      PostgreSQL 8.3
      Internet
      Web Server
      PHP 5.2.4
      Symfony 2.4
      Repository files
      Trial File
      Results File
      Environmental File
    • 17. Database design
    • 18. Authentication :
      • All users must register
      • 19. User profiles and permissions restrict functionality and capacity to edit or download information
      • 20. Facility to change password
    • 4 main entry points.
      Trial group: the group of trials across growing seasons or across sites (for example, international maize drought trial)
      Trial: individual trial during one growing season at one site
      Bibliography: any publication or report related to trials, including peer-reviewed articles, annual reports, gray literature, field books, etc. etc.
      Other: All related tables
      Database page
    • 21. Utilizes auto complete where possible
      Users choose options already found in tables as opposed to putting in new data – to avoid duplication and error
    • 22. Fields that are required are indicated as such.
    • 23. The positive sign icon is clicked to add a new entry to a table
      After clicking icon, a new form appears to enter tabular information
    • 24. Data sharing and intellectual property rights protocol
      This form accepts code from Creative Commons to establish IPR: click on the hyperlink.
      Step 1: A window appears that explains how to establish IPR. Click on Creative Commons logo
      Step 3: Generate code
      Step 2:
      Answer questions
    • 25. Accepts coordinate input in both degrees, minutes and seconds and decimal degrees; converts automatically from one to the other
    • 26. Users can add varieties here. Our current list includes over 700 varieties that we took from DSSAT
    • 27. Users can enter the traits or variables measured in the trial here. We have acquired these variable names from GCP’s www.cropontology.org
    • 28. Uploading trial data
      Trial results upload: in whatever format researcher manages their data in
      Supplemental information upload: methods used in the trial, management, etc. etc.
      Researchers designate whether environmental data can be downloaded or not.
      Weather conditions during trial, upload: in whatever format researcher manages their data in
      Soil conditions file: in whatever format researcher uses
    • 29. If users have given permission for others to download their files, they will have that capacity…….otherwise, any data or information about trials entered into the site will only be available as metadata (data about the trials, but not the raw data).
    • 30. Batch Upload
    • 31. Bibliography: any document related to agricultural technology evaluation at a site - such as field notes, gray literature and peer-reviewed publications
    • 32. CCAFS 'value addition
      Matching with the CCAFS Analogue tool & Farms of the future project
    • 33. Karnal (India)
      Rainy season from June to September
    • 34. Exploring bean trials in Central America and East Africa
      Search for similar sites
      Search bean trials for high yields for particular varieties
      Map and graph the results
    • 35. In map below – green areas are most climatologically similar to Kampala, Uganda. In graphic to the right, the Analogue dissimilarity index is plotted against average yields for the Jamapa variety of common bean. Trial results from sites with low dissimilarity and high yields may be of interest to Kampala bean researchers.
    • 36. In map below – green areas are most climatologically similar to Masaya, Nicaragua. In graphic to the right, the Analogue dissimilarity index is plotted against average yields for the PorrilloSinteticovariety of common bean at 128 sites. Trials results from sites with low dissimilarity and high yields may be of interest to Masaya bean researchers.
    • 37. Related ongoing activities
      Development of a generic methodology for G x E analysis to understand varietal response through genotype by environment. Method fully coded, documented and integrated into R-package
      Application of the method to one case study, using the data at www.agtrials.org
      Collaboration with crop modeling initiatives AgMIPS and Global Futures, including modeled trials.
      Development of a community of data analysts looking at varietal response for a whole range of crops (blog in Agtrials.org)
      Exploring collaboration with selected group of on-going programs and initiatives
    • 38. Thank you for your attention
      Q&A
      >> The Adaptation & Mitigation Knowledge Network
      It links farmers’ realities on the ground with promising scientific research outputs, to inspire new ideas and highlight current challenge.

    ×