• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Final project strategies that work to increase students’ reading

on

  • 414 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
414
Views on SlideShare
414
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Final project   strategies that work to increase students’ reading Final project strategies that work to increase students’ reading Presentation Transcript

    • Strategies That Work To Increase Students’ Reading
      • By Sandra Taylor
      • Presented by Gerardo Vazquez
    • Research Question
      • What strategies work to increase students’ reading?
    • Rationale
      • When Sandra was a young girl she struggled through reading classes. It wasn’t until 10 th grade that she met someone who introduced her to ghost stories. As she began to love reading:
      • Her comprehension grew.
      • She had conversations that helped her with clarification of the material.
      • She gained strategies to help her with other types of texts.
      • When she started her assignment at Leroy F. Greene Middle School in Sacramento, she saw that many of her students could not comprehend, and could not communicate with others about what they read.
      • She conducted a study using different strategies to help motivate readers.
    • Research Methodology
      • For the study, Sandra decided to encourage reading, and to collect data she would:
      • Create a reading-rich environment
      • Give the students a Time Investment Survey
      • Take the students on visits to the library
      • Divide the students into literature circles
      • Give a pretest and posttest
      • Give a Reading Interest Survey
    • Creating a Reading-Rich Environment
      • They had in class books shares. They would look at the front book cover, the summary on the back, and share information about the author as a class.
      • She would allow students to talk to each other about books they have read.
      • The only requirement for the classroom library was that she had to have read the book. This was so that she could recommend and discuss the books with the students.
      • The students generated a bulletin board listing their favorite books .
      • There were newspapers available for the students to read on their spare time
    • Time Investment Survey
      • The Time Investment Survey was a daily record sheet of all of the students specific activities, every half hour, including:
      • When they did homework, and what it was
      • When they watched TV, and what they watched
      • When and what they ate
      • When and what they read
    • Library Visits
      • During visits to the library Sandra would:
      • Record time and task behaviors of the students in a journal
      • Limit the areas the students could go to
      • Limit the books they could choose from
    • Literature Circles
      • Each literature circle:
      • Was divided into groups of 4 or 5
      • Picked a different book
      • Member got the same book
      • Decided on how many pages to read each day
      • Assigned jobs to each other
      • Sandra also kept track of the individual behavior of each student during literature circle time.
    • Pretest and Posttest
      • Each students was tested for fluency and vocabulary at the beginning and end of the study.
      • The students were given a grade appropriate text and a red pen.
      • The student read silently for 2 minutes and then circled the word they finished on.
      • Then they started at the circled word and repeated these steps four other times, for a total of 10 minutes read.
      • Then they calculated the number of words per minute read.
    • Pretest and Posttest
      • To test for vocabulary the students were given a list of 150 words.
      • 100 hundred of the words were real, and 50 words were made-up.
      • The students then read the words and circled “know” if they knew the words or “don’t know” if they didn’t know the word.
      • They were scored with one point for each word they knew that was correct, and had two points subtracted for each made-up word that they “know.”
    • Reading Interest Survey
      • All of the students were given a Reading Interest Survey.
      • The purpose of the survey was to get information on the students’ reading habits, movie and TV habits, the types of books they read, and if their parents read.
      • The following slides are some results of the survey
    • Is a Newspaper Delivered to your home? This Chart shows that only 60% of Lower level students had a paper delivered to their home compared to 80% of Gate students.
    • Amount of Time Watching TV Approximately 90% of lower level students. 85 % of middle level students, and 35% of GATE level students watch more than 2 hours of TV a day.
    • How often do you go to the movies? Lower Level students go to the movies more often than Middle Level and Gate Level students.
    • Observing Parent Reading Middle Level students observe their parents reading more frequently than both Lower Level and GATE Level students.
    • Results
      • Results for the Time Investment Survey:
      • Correlation of Survey and observations in class indicated that after in-class book shares casual reading increased.
      • When students chose their own books for the group to read, television viewing decreased.
    • Results
      • Results for Library visits
      • In the beginning of the study, many students were observed being off task in the library.
      • At the end of the study, all of the students but one displayed appropriate behavior and were on task.
      • The amount of time it took students to choose a book and go to their seats decreased from 45 minutes to 15 minutes.
    • Results
      • Results for the Literature circles were:
      • The Lower Level students had an increase of 7% of on task behaviors, the Middle Level had an increase of 24%, and the GATE Level had an increase of 12%.
      • The teacher observed more students on task when they had the option of what to read.
      • The comprehension score of the overall class increased by 23%.
    • Results
      • From the Pretest to the Posttest their was an increase in both fluency and vocabulary.
      • There was a gain of 17% for both the Middle Level and Lower Level students in fluency, and an increase of 15% for the GATE Level.
      • For vocabulary, the scores of the Lower Level and Middle Level groups increased 16%. Whereas the GATE Level increased 7%
    • Conclusion
      • All of the methods of reading engagement that were used (creating a rich reading environment, using literature circles, limiting books in the library, and creating a dialogue about literature) showed that they were successful in getting students to read.
      • In order for students to read for pleasure, they need to be “hooked” on the idea.
    • Application to my classroom
      • I have always had trouble motivating some of my students to read on their own. I always have a few who read without being told, but the majority of my class always seems to pay attention anything else, except for their book. Sandra Taylor gave several strategies of how to encourage students to read. Taylor also saw an improvement in reading fluency and vocabulary knowledge in her students. As a Social Justice educator, anything that I can do to help my students close the “achievement gap” is helpful. As I try this in my own class, I’d like to see if the same strategies would help my EL students learn and become familiar with more words, as assessed by the vocabulary test given by Taylor.
    • References
      • There was no supporting Literature used.
      • There are no references given.