Week 9 team evaluations
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Week 9 team evaluations

on

  • 263 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
263
Views on SlideShare
263
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Week 9 team evaluations Week 9 team evaluations Presentation Transcript

  • TEAM ILLUMINATE EVALUATIONSFriday, March 23, 2012
  • TEAM EFFECTIVENESSFriday, March 23, 2012
  • TEAM EFFECTIVENESS WEEK 4Friday, March 23, 2012 View slide
  • TEAM EFFECTIVENESS WEEK 9 GOALS AND DIRECTION Stated goals and directions clearly Agreed on goals and common direction Determined the next stage of project and discussed upcoming duties Expressed questions or concerns about the scope of the project Discuss regularly to maintain project goal and objective Delegate work equally among the team members INTERACTION AND RESPONSIVENESS Trusted and accepted ideas and comments from each other Opened and shared information Opened for giving and receiving feedbacks Involved in the decisions we have to make Listened and interested in what others are saying Prevent group thinking Comment or suggest team member assignments CONCLUSIONS AND ACHIEVEMENTS All of our goals were completed The team was on track with respect to goals Future goals and activities were delegated out among team Team members freely express their point of views Accomplishing tasks with consensus in completion Members growing as individuals 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Friday, March 23, 2012 View slide
  • TEAM EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON WEEK 4 WEEK 9 GOALS AND DIRECTION Stated goals and directions clearly Agreed on goals and common direction Determined the next stage of project and discussed upcoming duties Expressed questions or concerns about the scope of the project Discuss regularly to maintain project goal and objective Delegate work equally among the team members INTERACTION AND RESPONSIVENESS Trusted and accepted ideas and comments from each other Opened and shared information Opened for giving and receiving feedbacks Involved in the decisions we have to make Listened and interested in what others are saying Prevent group thinking Comment or suggest team member assignments CONCLUSIONS AND ACHIEVEMENTS All of our goals were completed The team was on track with respect to goals Future goals and activities were delegated out among team Team members freely express their point of views Accomplishing tasks with consensus in completion Members growing as individuals 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Friday, March 23, 2012
  • TEAM EFFECTIVENESS TAKEAWAYS POSITIVES - AGREEING ON GOALS/ACCOMPLISHING TASKS GREAT - MARKED IMPROVEMENTS IN LISTENING TO OTHERS, EXPRESSING CONCERNS IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED - DELEGATE WORK EQUALLY - OPEN AND RECEIVED FEEDBACK STILL A PROBLEMFriday, March 23, 2012
  • LEADER EVALUATIONSFriday, March 23, 2012
  • LEADER EVALUATIONFriday, March 23, 2012
  • LEADER EVALUATIONS ORGANIZATION Provided Useful Agenda Clearly well prepared Followed logical order Managed Team resources Distributed Work Load COMMUNICATION Effectively communicates Stated assignments clearly Allowed ample opportunities for questions Conducted a thorough follow-up of questions Offered constructive feedbacks ATTITUDE Team leader was personable Showed genuine interests in suggestions Welcomed member involvement Attentive to members’ needs Support and encourage members 0 7.5 15.0 22.5 30.0Friday, March 23, 2012
  • LEADER COMPARISON WEEK 4 ORGANIZATION Provided Useful Agenda WEEK 9 Clearly well prepared Followed logical order Managed Team resources Distributed Work Load COMMUNICATION Effectively communicates Stated assignments clearly Allowed ample opportunities for questions Conducted a thorough follow-up of questions Offered constructive feedbacks ATTITUDE Team leader was personable Showed genuine interests in suggestions Welcomed member involvement Attentive to members’ needs Support and encourage members 0 7.5 15.0 22.5 30.0Friday, March 23, 2012
  • LEADER EVALUATIONS TAKEAWAYS POSITIVES - WORKING BETTER AT FOLLOWING UP - STILL EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION - SHOWING INTEREST IN MEMBER INVOLVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED - MANAGING TEAM RESOURCES GETTING WORSE - NOT AS PREPARED AS BEFOREFriday, March 23, 2012
  • GROUP EVALUATIONSFriday, March 23, 2012
  • GROUP EVALUATIONSFriday, March 23, 2012
  • GROUP EVALUATIONS TASKS-ORIENTED BEHAVIOR Contributed to the team Focused on mission and goals Came on assignment prepared Exhibited skills necessary to complete goals Take consensus RELATIONS-ORIENTED BEHAVIOR Valued/supported ideas Welcomed suggestions Harmonized Compromised Encouraged participations SELF-ORIENTED BEHAVIORS Personable/approachable Worked well on team Participated in team discussion Avoid nitpick 0 6.25 12.50 18.75 25.00 TotalsFriday, March 23, 2012
  • GROUP COMPARISON WEEK 4 TASKS-ORIENTED BEHAVIOR WEEK 9 Contributed to the team Focused on mission and goals Came on assignment prepared Exhibited skills necessary to complete goals Take consensus RELATIONS-ORIENTED BEHAVIOR Valued/supported ideas Welcomed suggestions Harmonized Compromised Encouraged participations SELF-ORIENTED BEHAVIORS Personable/approachable Worked well on team Participated in team discussion Avoid nitpick 0 6.25 12.50 18.75 25.00Friday, March 23, 2012
  • GROUP EVALUATIONS TAKEAWAYS POSITIVES - BETTER JOB AT EXHIBITING SKILLS - TAKING CONSENSUS/ AVOID NITPICKING STILL OUTSTANDING IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED - NO LARGE IMPROVEMENTS IN BEHAVIOR - STILL ISSUES WITH PARTICIPATION AT LARGE AND IN TEAM DISCUSSIONSFriday, March 23, 2012