Sustainability : Back To The Future Or Forward To The Past?

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Sustainability : Back To The Future Or Forward To The Past? - Presentation Transcript

    1. S ustainability Back to the future or Forward to the past ?
    2. A new old concept
      • My grandmother did not know the word “sustainability”
      • It was called common sense
      • Think about this: per definition what is not sustainable has no future.
    3. W hy does it pay off to have good environmental practices?
      • Economy is more than just money and profits.
      • Origin of two terms often seen as antagonistic:
        • Economy comes from the Greek oikos (house, habitat) and nomos (administration)
        • Ecology comes from the Greek words oikos and logos (knowledge)
    4. W hy did people repair and recycle?
      • Not enough money to throw away and replace.
      • Little disposable income.
      • No easy credit.
      • Repairing cost less than replacing.
      • There were spare parts!
    5. W hy did people repair and recycle? Painting by Van Gogh
    6. W hat is not sustainable?
      • Anything that consistently increases contaminant levels in:
      Air Water Soil Us
    7. W hat is not sustainable?
      • Anything that is not quickly biodegradable.
      • Anything that consistently deplete resources necessary for our essential needs.
        • Ex. 1: Oceans
        • Ex. 2: Forests
        • Ex. 3: Genetic diversity
    8. W hat changed?
      • Higher disposable income
      • Consumption society
        • Easy credit
        • Aggressive marketing
        • Individualism
      • Vacations/Leisure time
      • Short-term thinking
      • Shift from local/regional economy to global economy
      • Frequent relocation of industrial units
      • Strong world population increase
    9. W hat changed?
      • Pyramid of Maslow
        • Used to be: mostly two lower layers
        • Became: focus on higher levels, taking the lower level for granted
    10. W hat did we do wrong?
      • We focused on short-term gratification and profit.
      • We did not master our technological progress and become too efficient.
        • Ex. 1: Fisheries
        • Ex. 2: Deforestation
      • We forgot to factor the environmental cost in the pricing of goods and services
        • Damage takes time to come to light
        • Preference of the present
        • What would have been the actual price?
    11. W hat did we do wrong? Technology Efficiency Social Responsibility Individualism 40’s 80’s NOW Restoring sustainability
    12. H ow to become sustainable again?
      • Simple answer: by reducing waste and wasting.
        • Energy
        • Water
        • Food
      • Use only what we need.
      • No excesses.
      • Management of environment integral part of human activities.
      • Recycle everything: nothing to a landfill unless biodegradable.
      • Reintroduce spare parts.
      • Education, starting at young age.
    13. I s a sustainable society sustainable?
      • Simple answer: Yes. Been done for millennia.
      • But: it means moving to a different type of society
      • From consumption to maintenance
      • Different jobs
        • More in maintenance, care and repair
        • Less in mass consumer goods
        • Blue collar jobs will be revalued up: useful vs. superfluous
    14. I s a sustainable society sustainable?
      • From quantity to quality: longer lasting products with repair service.
      • End of mass production of “stupid” products.
      • Household spending/Overall economy to shift from shopping to society purposes.
      • Will define a new comfort zone: from convenience to practical.
      • It is a whole new mindset!
    15. I s a sustainable society sustainable? A few examples
      • If North American cars run on same fuel efficiency as European cars = Equivalent of 80-100 millions cars less on N. Am continent, on a gas emission basis!
      • A flushing of the toilet uses the daily need for drinking water of 4-5 people! One flushing less a day by all Westerners = saving equivalent of drinking water needs of population of China + India
      • If the Westerners ate the meat quantity that is just needed for covering their basic needs instead of over consuming = Equivalent of the basic needs for meat of whole of China becomes immediately available, with no meat production increase!
    16. W hat is needed to manage the change?
      • Strong leadership and political will (politicians and economic agents).
      • Lots of communication.
      • Based on science and facts.
      • Collective understanding of the issues, and collective action .
      • Incentives (and penalties?): Money always talks in the end.
      • Education: youth will define the future.
    17. T he lessons from Nature and from the Great Recession of 2008-2009
      • Nature is about balance. When the pendulum swings to far, it will swing back!
      • Economic model was dysfunctional: leading to environmental and financial disaster.
      • First concern was on environment, before financial markets. Now it is the opposite.
      • What the financial crisis did:
        • Less spending and more saving
        • Less credit=less consumption
        • Less money=less consumption
        • Leads to less CO2 emissions=good for the environment
        • Unfortunately, many jobs lost and foreclosures
    18. T he lessons from nature and from the Great Recession of 2008-2009
      • Economy supposed to restart with Stimulus Packages (maintenance projects) all around the world, not with consumption.
      • Oil price spike brought serious change:
        • US car industry undergoing major shift
        • People were changing their habits (public transportation, carpooling)
        • Realization that oil reserves are finite=need for alternatives
        • Alternative energies will become more competitive (but cheap energy might soon be a thing from the past)
      • Means shift from consumption to maintenance is starting.
    19. S ustainability and modernity
      • Can we have comfort and sustainability?
        • Yes, just as good but different.
        • Thanks to responsible attitude.
        • Thanks to new technologies.
      • Can we have industry and sustainability?
        • Yes, a sustainable industry.
        • By refusing unsustainable products.
        • By rewarding sustainable producers.
      • Can we meet the increasing world population needs and be sustainable?
        • Will be challenging.
        • We can handle 9 billion people.
        • We need proper leadership.
    20. F or more on this topic and how we can help
      • Website: www.hfgfoodfuturist.com
      • Email: info@happyfuturegroup.com
    21.  
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Christophe PelletierChristophe Pelletier Nominate

    custom

    326 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 326
      • 317 on SlideShare
      • 9 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 9 views on http://hfgfoodfuturist.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 9 views on http://hfgfoodfuturist.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories