DAPP141 session 4: Good teaching


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

DAPP141 session 4: Good teaching

  1. 1. Good Teaching Chrissi Nerantzi @chrissinerantzi & Haleh Moravej @halehmoravej PGCAP > DAPP http://www.celt.mmu.ac.uk/ @mmu_celt
  2. 2. intended learning outcomes By the end of this theme, you will have had the opportunity to: • discuss Good Teaching in HE • identify specific aspects of quality assurance and quality enhancement in HE linked to teaching • explore how to evaluate practice and what Good Teaching means in your own context 2
  3. 3. ”They [Teachers] should not feel compelled to adopt a persona that is unnatural or seems to go against the grain of his or her personality” (Light et al 2009:124)
  4. 4. Good practice activity (part 1) What does good practice look like for teaching in HE? Discuss and create a poster in small groups. (10 mins) Compare your posters against the the UK PSF and the MMU Learning, Teaching and Assessment Strategy (10 mins) 4
  5. 5. student(s)
  6. 6. Three main theories of teaching in HE Theory 1: Teaching as telling, transmission or delivery PASSIVE students are passive recipients of the wisdom of a single speaker – all problems reside outside the lecturer Theory 2: Teaching as organising or facilitating student activity - ACTIVE students are active – problems shared Theory 3: Teaching as making learning possible – SELFDIRECTED teaching is cooperative learning to help students change their understanding. It focuses on critical barriers to student learning (Threshold Concepts – Meyer and Land, 2003) Learning is applying and modifying one’s own ideas; it is something the student does, rather than something that is done to the student. Teaching is speculative and reflective, teaching activities are context-related, uncertain and continuously improvable. Chris (Ramsden, 2003, 108-112)
  7. 7. What does the sector say?
  8. 8. The Dimensions of the UK Professional Standards Framework Areas of Activity (WHAT) • Design and plan • Teach/support • Assess/give feedback • Develop effective learning environments and approaches to student support/guidance • Engage in CPD incorporating research, scholarship and evaluation of professional practices Core Knowledge (HOW) • Subject • Appropriate methods of teaching and learning • How students learn • Use and value appropriate learning technologies • Methods for evaluating effectiveness of teaching • Quality assurance and quality enhancement Professional Values (WHY) • Respect individual learners and learning communities • Promote participation and equality of opportunities • Use evidence-informed approaches and the outcomes from research, scholarship and CPD • Acknowledge the wider context in which HE operates recognising implications for professional practice 8
  9. 9. The Descriptors of the UK Professional Standards Framework 9 D1 D2 D3 D4 Associate Fellow Fellow Senior Fellow Principal Fellow • early career researchers with some teaching • staff new to teaching including part-time staff • staff supporting academic provision (learning technologists, library staff • demonstrators, technicians with some teaching responsibilities • experienced staff new to teaching or with limited teaching portfolio • Early career academics in full teaching role • Academic related, support staff with substantive teaching responsibilities • Staff with teachingonly responsibilities, including within workbased settings • Experienced staff who demonstrate impact and influence through leading, managing organising programmes, subjects/disciplinary areas • Experienced subject mentors and staff supporting those new to teaching • Experienced staff with departmental and/or wider teaching and learning support advisory responsibilities • Highly experiences/senior staff with wideranging academic/academicrelated strategic leadership responsibilities linked to teaching and supporting learning • Staff responsible for institutional strategic leadership and policymaking in teaching and learning • Staff who have strategic impact and influence in relation to teaching and learning that extends beyond their own institution
  10. 10. MMU context 10
  11. 11. http://www.celt.mmu.ac.uk/ltastrategy/index.php
  12. 12. Good practice activity (part 2) Compare your posters against the UK PSF and the MMU Learning, Teaching and Assessment Strategy (10 mins) 12
  13. 13. 7 principles of good practice in undergraduate education Effective teaching in higher education 5E’s of an excellent University Teacher • 1. 2. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. • • • • • • Encourages contacts between students and faculty. Develops reciprocity and cooperation among students. Uses active learning techniques. Gives prompt feedback. Emphasizes time on task. Communicates high expectations. Respects diverse talents and ways of learning. Interest and explanation Concern and respect for students and student learning 3. Appropriate assessment and feedback 4. Clear goals and intellectual challenge 5. Independence, control and engagement 6. Learning from students (Ramsden, 2008) education experience enthusiasm ease eccentricity Gibson, J. (2009) The five ‘Es’ of an excellent teacher, The Clinical Teacher, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp. 3–5. (Chickering & Gamson, 1987) issue: they measure satisfaction NOT engagement
  14. 14. source: Jeff Dunn: The 8 Characteristics Of A 21st Century Teacher http://edudemic.com/2013/04/the-8-characteristics-of-a-21st-century-teacher/
  16. 16. Students Voice? MMU NSS 2013
  17. 17. student voice
  18. 18. tutor has teaching qualification active learning class size: 1 tutor 20 students students: time on task tutor full-time tutor load: 1 class collaborative and social learning tutors as reflective practitioners clear and high expectations programme teams to work together Quality: What really matters? quick feedback for learning social relationships programme team students using feedback learning hours matter focus on formative assessment intellectual challenge peer assessment ‘close contact’ student tutor interactions and relationship for educational gains students as partners positive research environment Prof. Graham Gibbs
  19. 19. Gibbs, G (2010) Dimensions of quality, York: The Higher Education Academy, pp. 19-37 Gibbs, G (2012) Implications of ‘Dimensions of quality’ in a market environment, York: The Higher Education Academy Prof. Graham Gibbs
  20. 20. http://www.qaa.ac.uk
  21. 21. http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/
  22. 22. Scenarios: Discussion and debate
  23. 23. scenarios: [1, 2] [3, 4] • Task 1 (10min): Work in groups of 4. Critique, debate, suggest solutions • Task 2 (10min): Share your thoughts with another group
  24. 24. scenario 1 “I employ teacher-focused methods when I deliver lectures to large groups of students. With a large group of students, it is difficult to be interactive.”
  25. 25. scenario 2 “I have minimised lecture material in my courses and maximised individual and group research projects, group problem-solving, and in-class discussions. Although I don’t cover as much material this way, the students learn and retain this material better. Also, standard lecture format is not the way that we learn after university. Instead, we are expected to read for ourselves and get the information that way. Thus, I feel my teaching approach better prepares students for life after university.”
  26. 26. “The lecture delivers the necessary core knowledge and content that the student needs to succeed.”
  27. 27. “Though I need sometimes to lecture and may even enjoy doing it, lecturing all the time simply bores me: I usually know what I am going to say, and I have heard it all before. But dialogical methods of teaching help keep me alive. Forces to listen, respond, and improvise. I am more likely to hear something unexpected and insightful from myself as well as others.” (Palmer, 2007, 25)
  28. 28. References Chickering, A. W. & Gamson, Z. F. (1987) "Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education" American Association of Higher Education Bulletin vol.39 no.7 pp.3-7 Light,G., Cox, R. and Calkins. S (2009) Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, The Reflective Professional, London: Sage Publications. Meyer, J.H.F. and Land, R. (2003) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practising, In: Rust, C. (ed.), Improving Student Learning - Theory and Practice Ten Years On. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (OCSLD), pp 412-424. Palmer, P. J. (2007) The Courage to Teach. Exploring the Inner Landscape of a Teacher’s Life, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Race, P. (2009) In at the deep-end: starting to teach in higher education, Leeds Metropolitan University Ramsden, P (2003) Learning to teach in Higher Education, Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.