The Challenges of Implementing Learning 2.0

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    Because now is the moment of acceptance!

    Are you familiar with Gartner’s Hype Cycle? This tracks the progress of technologies towards acceptance by mainstream users. The stages are the Technology TriggerThe Peak of Inflated ExpectationsThe Trough of DisillusionmentThe Slope of Enlightenment and The Plateau of ProductivityCheck out where we are in the hype cycle for these emerging technologies. This is from 2008. Notice where some Learning 2.0 tools are on the curve. Microblogging (Twitter)Social Computing Platforms (blogs, wikis, tagging, RSS, social networking)Public Virtual Worlds (Second Life)Web 2.0 (of course)BloggingWikisAnd perhaps most importantly, Basic Web Services, which is the architectural backbone behind Web 2.0. And note that Web Services took less than 2 years to reach mainstream adoption. That’s a testament to its power!Now, all of this to say that we are at a moment of acceptance for web 2.0 tools. And that has important implications for those of us trying to figure out how to better train people!So, the technology is being accepted. And there are currently two important trends converging on this moment of acceptance….

    Now let’s look at who is impacted by all of this hard stuff and how.

    Another new design framework made possible by Learning 2.0 is the extension of learning beyond a single event. The technology allows an eight hour course to be delivered in eight one-hour blocks once a week over two months. Blogs and wikis allow for the discussion to continue in the time between class sessions. Podcasts and RSS deliver content to the learners in measured doses, keeping the information fresh in their minds. Although this requires more forethought from designers, the greater granularity allows for better retention rates and deeper learning.

    The other part of the adult learner equation is management. As much as we need to communicate the new expectations of Learning 2.0 to our learners, we must spend equal time educating managers on the expectations and benefits of this new learning style. Managers are accustomed to losing a day or two of productivity when sending their people to training. As formal course time is shrinking, they need to expect the frequency of work interruptions to increase even though the duration is decreasing. We have to educateManagers on the advantages of learners staying engaged with the topic longer. Workers may be back at their desks, but the learning continues. It is up to us to communicate this value to managers.What’s the best way to accomplish this? Incorporate Learning 2.0 into your management development programs and let managers encounter the power of Learning 2.0 for themselves. The best way for managers to appreciate both the power of Learning 2.0 and the difference fromtraditioal learning is to experience it first-hand.END LEARNER SECTION

    Now, what I want to do in this part is solicit some examples from you guys. I’ll give you an example of one of the things I’ve done, and then I’d like you to share some of your stories. Good or bad. Let’s end with a general discussion of Learning 2.0, both the perils and the successes.

    1 Favorite & 1 Group

    The Challenges of Implementing Learning 2.0 - Presentation Transcript

    1. Web 2.0: Big, Vague, Beautiful
      The Challenges of Implementing Learning 2.0
      Chris King, PMP
    2. Defining Web 2.0
      “The best thing about web 2.0 is that -- nobody knows what the [heck] it means. Even the ones who coined the term are still struggling to find a compact definition. And this is the true beauty and power of Web 2.0 -- it makes people think.”
      Kathy Sierra, “The best thing about web 2.0,” October 11, 2005, Creating Passionate Users blog
      http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2005/10/the_best_thing_.html
      2
      c 2009 Chris King
    3. 3
      c 2009 Chris King
      Processes needed for Learning (traditional classroom activates all of these for the most part…)
    4. 4
      c 2009 Chris King
      Processes activated by most WBT (WBT’s sweet spot is Simulation and (mostly) Practice…)
    5. 5
      c 2009 Chris King
      Processes activated by Learning 2.0 (the more active processes, the more effective and efficient the learning…)
    6. Key Web 2.0 Concepts
      6
      c 2009 Chris King
    7. Web 2.0 attitude
      7
      c 2009 Chris King
    8. Why Now?
      8
      c 2009 Chris King
    9. Technology is tested, proven, and accepted
      c 2009 Chris King
      9
    10. c 2009 Chris King
      10
      Physical dispersal creates a need for better collaboration and connectedness
    11. c 2009 Chris King
      11
      The best thing that can be said about most e-learning is that gives you the sensation of a coma without the worry or inconvenience
      Slide courtesy of Anders Gronstadt, Gronstadt Consulting
    12. c 2009 Chris King
      12
    13. But still, why now?
      c 2009 Chris King
      13
    14. Nearing the tipping point
      c 2009 Chris King
      14
      There is a growing acknowledgement from business leaders that learning must happen continuously
    15. Nearing the tipping point
      c 2009 Chris King
      15
      There is a demand from a workforce increasingly familiar with Web 2.0 tools and concepts
    16. Nearing the tipping point
      c 2009 Chris King
      16
      There is a business climate where speed is valued over complexity; flexibility over comprehen-siveness
    17. This stuff really works
      17
      c 2009 Chris King
      It is well-suited for smaller, more frequently accessed instructional chunks
    18. This stuff really works
      18
      c 2009 Chris King
      The path to content is shorter, satisfying shrinking attention-spans
    19. This stuff really works
      19
      c 2009 Chris King
      Technology is a multiplier, extending learning beyond the classroom
    20. This stuff really works
      c 2009 Chris King
      20
      Low-profile learning (often user-generated) has low overhead and low barriers to creation
    21. The Bottom Line
      21
      c 2009 Chris King
    22. c 2009 Chris King
      22

      To be persuasive, we must be believable. To be believable, we must be credible. To be credible, we must be truthful.
      Edward R. Murrow

    23. SKY
      pie
      c 2009 Chris King
      23
    24. Bottom Line
      24
      This is hard.
      c 2009 Chris King
    25. Bottom Line
      25
      c 2009 Chris King
    26. Bottom Line
      c 2009 Chris King
      26
      The challenges of integrating Learning 2.0 for designers, instructors and learners should not be underestimated.
    27. Ch-ch-ch-changes
      (with apologies to David Bowie)
      c 2009 Chris King
      27
    28. c 2009 Chris King
      28
    29. Instructional Designers
      Must design for a variety of motivational levels
      Extend learning beyond the event
      Number of interactions increases as classroom time decreases
      29
      c 2009 Chris King
    30. c 2009 Chris King
      30
      D3
      D4
      D2
      D1
      Competence
      Commitment
      Hersey Blanchard Motivational Archetypes
    31. c 2009 Chris King
      31
      D3
      D4
      Low competence, high commitment
      D2
      D1
      Competence
      Commitment
      Hersey Blanchard Motivational Archetypes
    32. c 2009 Chris King
      32
      D3
      D4
      Some competence, low commitment
      D2
      D1
      Competence
      Commitment
      Hersey Blanchard Motivational Archetypes
    33. c 2009 Chris King
      33
      D3
      D4
      High competence, variable commitment
      D2
      D1
      Competence
      Commitment
      Hersey Blanchard Motivational Archetypes
    34. c 2009 Chris King
      34
      D3
      D4
      High competence, high commitment
      D2
      D1
      Competence
      Commitment
      Hersey Blanchard Motivational Archetypes
    35. Beyond the classroom
      c 2009 Chris King
      35
    36. Changing ID priorities
      Classroom Time
      Interactions with Content
      36
      c 2009 Chris King
    37. Instructors
      Familiar rituals
      Subtle and not-so-subtle changes
      Pre- and post-course workload increasing
      37
      c 2009 Chris King
    38. Instructors still…
      c 2009 Chris King
      38
    39. But now…
      39
      c 2009 Chris King
    40. Learners
      Violated Adult Learning principles
      Technology inhibits before it enhances
      Don’t assume tool competency
      Management as a barrier
      40
      c 2009 Chris King
    41. “I’m scared…hold me”
      41
      c 2009 Chris King
      Adults learn best in a safe, inclusive, comfortable environment where their opinions are respected, their learning has practical applications, there are opportunities to share experiences, and which accommodates different levels of self-direction.
      Learning 2.0 violates some of these principles!
    42. Generational divide overstated
      They are more used to:
      OMG! BOOMS! C/W 2 EZ, JMO. But U R a KIA. JK! SRSLY, RTFM.
      42
      c 2009 Chris King
      Younger workers are no smarter about using Web 2.0 for learning!
    43. The final obstacle
      c 2009 Chris King
      43
      You must convince Managers to trust this new style of learning by incorporating Learning 2.0 into Management Training
    44. Putting it into practice
      44
      c 2009 Chris King
    45. Putting it into practice
      45
      c 2009 Chris King
      • Nine week program, meet once a week for an hour via teleconference
      • Students responsible for exploring the topics in between class sessions
      • Session focused on discussing application and answering questions
      • A Blog is the backbone of student participation
    46. 23 Things in action
      46
      c 2009 Chris King
      Active use of each tool provides students with:
      • Information (content)
      • Context with Content
      • Practice
      Each week, there is
      • Remediation to correct misinformation
      • Simulation of a classroom application of the tool
      • Checking for Understanding, through the active use of the tool – info not just digested, but used
    47. Putting it into practice
      47
      c 2009 Chris King
      Blog posts allow:
      • Instructor to check for confusion
      • Targeted Coaching
      • Students to get a chance at Cognitive Rehearsal
    48. Wrapping up
      c 2009 Chris King
      48
    49. Bottom Line
      49
      This is hard.
      c 2009 Chris King
      Reminder:
    50. A brave new world…
      The challenges of integrating Learning 2.0 for designers, instructors and learners should not be underestimated.
      This stuff requires more, not less, people to make it work
      This isn’t threatening your employment – your current job, maybe, but not your paycheck!
      50
      c 2009 Chris King
    51. Thank you!
      Chris King, PMP
      cking@sevatec.com, 571.228.0253
      c 2009 Chris King
      51

    + Chris KingChris King, 4 months ago

    custom

    201 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    The challenges of implementing Learning 2.0 for des more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 201
      • 201 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories