Publishers “in” Libraries:New Agents, New Roles, New Challenges - Presentation Transcript
Publishers “in” Libraries: New Agents, New Roles, New Challenges Terence K. Huwe Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Library University of California, Berkeley Long Island Library Resources Council October 30, 2009
What I’ll Be Covering Today
The growing culture of library-based publishing, editorial work and marketing
Publishers, libraries and readers (“users”) in an era of mutable information and self-directed publishing
How the Internet still challenges us to adapt—collectively and individually
Some examples of how “publishers in libraries” can influence scholarship
A Little More About Me…
My first career: independent bookselling!
College store, co-op style outlet, million-plus dollar sales (1986 dollars)
Lots of contact with marketers, sales people and editors
Publishers Weekly was my “Bible”
I know and love the publishing industry
It’s been a great basis for a library career
But…“Publishers in Libraries?”
A play on words with a tip of the hat to Computers in Libraries ( CIL ), which publishes my column
A “poke” at Dan Chudnov, whose column in CIL is titled “Libraries in Computers”
An apt description of my job
A viable term to describe the new library “skill set” that we need
A provocative statement
A Not-So-New Expertise
Librarians have been practicing editorial work for a long time
Marketing is now essential
Librarians’ scholarly profile (degrees, experience, etc) shares common ground with editors and their career ladders
New media make it possible to shift the points of production along the “information continuum.”
This creates new competition for “attention.”
Ergo: There can be more than one publisher-outlet
Libraries have adapted well to the climate—at a high price
Adapt or Die: A Seminal Moment
A copyright presentation at ASIS (now ASIS&T) in November 1997
Counsel for ALA and AAP, talking about how to manage access to digital copyrighted works
The ALA lawyer had an enormously well-articulated vision
The AAP lawyer was on the defensive, and short on ideas
“ Wow,” I thought:
Librarians were “getting it” and going for it
We had developed tough evaluative skills to assess our legacy charges and our future roles—freeing space for creativity
Publishers were struggling with new pricing and access models
The faculty, back home, was basically “clueless” at the time
Opportunity strikes!
Since Then…
SPARC
Engaging the faculty re: scholarly communications
Mellon Foundation initiatives
New “metrics” for libraries
Endless opportunities for communication
A growing need for “interpretation” of collections
All-new entrants with big ideas: Google
Publishing in Libraries is Underway
Reasonable minds may disagree about how much we should do
“ mission creep” –a scary prospect (“Even more to do?”)
The role is to some degree being forced upon us
In light of that force, I will take a look two theories of convergence and shifting roles
I’ll give some examples of projects underway
Understanding the Knowledge Creation Process
Two theories of information that are particularly compelling:
The Getty Information Institute and the “Information Continuum”
Professional culture and the process of “Treatment Substitution” (Abbott, 1988)
The Getty Information Institute (GII)
GII Published several Web-based reports in the mid to late 1990s
The analysis of GII informs much of what we now accept about digital life
The Information Continuum
It runs from author to user
It includes several agents:
editors
Marketers
outlets (bookstores, journals, even e-books)
Information managers (libraries, archives, repositories)
The information continuum democratizes information production and “expertise”
These agents have been in creative turmoil for three decades by my estimation
But People Make Things Happen
Sociologists study how people change systems and ways of thinking
Librarianship need look no further than this related field to find clues to its future
Andrew Abott’s Assessment of Professional Roles
Abbott, Andrew. The system of professions . Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1988
“ The Traditional Future: A Computational Theory of Library Research" College and Research Libraries , November 2008, Vol. 69, No. 6
“ Treatment Substitution”
Abbott provides an in-depth analysis of how the U.S. system of professions works
A focus on the information professions
Treatment substitution: competition among the professions
Treatment substitution is the application of abstract knowledge to real-life situations
It often utilizes special language to be unique (e.g., use of latin in law)
An Example of Dynamic Treatment Substitution: Medicine
Licensed Acupuncture
Chiropractic
Osteopathy
Medical Doctors
“ Allied Health Professionals”
Even nurses (NPs, PAs )
A battle royal for the right to use the word “medical” and to diagnose
And Closer to Home…
Librarians
California Digital Library staff: they’re not librarians—more on that in a moment…
Systems Administrators: they manage content
University administrators with downsizing on their minds
Editors
Faculty: they also manage content
Booksellers: they make content accessible
MIS managers in private firms and colleges: they rule
Users themselves! (Blogging, Twittering)
Repository managers and records managers
Treatment Substitution is our daily life
Too Close to Home?
The University of California Information, Publishing and Broadcast Services (IPBS) initiative
“ UCverse and UCpublic
Integrating:
A gateway to all content, built or purchased
A social network
A “tool” to secure the future for academic content
The faculty will be “Topical Editorial Advisors”
Talk about Treatment Substitution!
How Are Librarians Doing?
Close ties to users have helped us see opportunity in the digital forum
New generations of colleagues are bold
Senior visionaries have a sharp understanding of scholarship
We became content creators even as we gained a charge to collect digital content
We have laid a foundation for new roles that flow beyond the library, and “follow the user”
Publishing’s Evolution Has Helped
Newspapers: from “take it or leave it” to “talking back”
Journals: multiple formats, pricing structures, pushback from libraries
Books: blockbusters pay the rent, “mid-list” suffers, niche markets (like sci-fi) can thrive, but:
Ebooks are here
Self-publishing is happening
How to deal with fewer outlets (Amazon, etc)?
The Climate Favors Bold Ideas
Forward thinking librarians have seized the Web 2.0 tools
Librarians participate in substantive discourse, opinions and research
Research libraries boast large cohorts of dual-degreed and Ph.D-librarians
Universities and coalitions are building publishing tools that directly address faculty needs
Web applications and cloud computing place all the necessary tools in our hands
Some Questions:
Can we re-purpose our collections as a “list” –a publishers’ new list— of e-books in series, or as print-on-demand” (POD) volumes?
Can we manage our digital publishing to advance the “imprimatur” of the library and the university?
Harvard, MIT, Berkeley, Dartmouth and Cornell have signed a five-way “Compact”
Can we become publishers? If so, should we want to?
The Columnist Speaks Out
My views are my own—the “marketplace of ideas” is their crucible
I see a nascent demand for more scholarship, more metadata, and more taxonomy that is conducted by librarians —and we can do that
The profession’s core skills are indispensable on the information continuum
I see a much lower threshold for the creation of extremely high quality digital publications
I see a vast cohort of like-minded colleagues who can curate, edit and write
I believe that reference and collections experts are just one step away from high-level publishing, right now
Talk and Opinion are Cheap…
How about some examples:
Blogs, Blogs, Blogs
Library Guides
“New” library work: existing editorial roles
POD technology: it’s here
POD at MLibrary
In trial stages (per their Web FAQ)
Small number of popular titles
Must be between 90-440 pp
Color cover, B&W pages
Cost: $6 for a shorter title, $10 for longer titles
Cover art may not be included; a generic cover is provided
Cannot print in-copyright materials without express permission
The Espresso Book Machine (and competitors) Has Traction:
MLibrary hopes to offer:
Access to most of the Library's out-of-copyright books
Printing and binding of theses and dissertations
Reprints of faculty-authored out-of-print books
Printing and binding of new materials written by faculty and students
Caverly, Doug. “Google Books Opens Door to On-Demand Printing.” September 17, 2009, www.webpronews.com
Soon: A Leap in Scale?
The Library of America
How about “Berkeley Editions”
Thematic, interpretative series of digital objects, flowing from the library and the faculty in concert
The concentrated intellectual power in the academy is beginning to speak a common language
Partnerships strengthen imprimatur
Consortia, library-publisher, 2.0 “community”
Forecasts and Trends
We face a choice: either to allow technology to force us into action, or to take action and manage the process
“Change agents”—imaginative staff—will lead if library administrators cannot or will not
Research universities and prestigious libraries can use imprimatur to gain “attention”
Conclusions
We are becoming publishers
We can embrace that role
There are many venues to engage in
It is possible to integrate rigorous publishing into our existing workflows
Huwe, Terence K. “Publishers in Libraries.” Computers in Libraries 29 (No. 4), April 2009
The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, http://www.arl.org/sparc/
The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, http://www.mellon.org/
Fink, Eleanor E. “The Getty Information Institute: A Retrospective.” D-Lib Magazine 5 (No. 3), March 1999
Abbott, Andrew. The system of professions . Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1988
Abbott, Andrew. “The Traditional Future: A Computational Theory of Library Research" College and Research Libraries , 69 (No. 6), November 2008
Bergman, Barry. “A Public Option for Scholarship. The Berkeleyan , October 2, 2009, http://berkeley.edu/news/berkeleyan/2009/10/02_open-access.shtml
Caverly, Doug. “Google Books Opens Door to On-Demand Printing.” September 17, 2009, www.webpronews.com
Publishers “in” Libraries: New Agents, New Roles, New Challenges Terence K. Huwe Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Library University of California, Berkeley Long Island Library Resources Council October 30, 2009
0 comments
Post a comment