Dublin Core Collection Application Profile - task group

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Dublin Core Collection Application Profile - task group - Presentation Transcript

    1. Dublin Core Collection Application Profile Task group [email_address] Dublin Core Conference 2007, Singapour Muriel Foulonneau, CNRS
    2. Members
      • Leads: Sarah L. Shreeves/Muriel Foulonneau
        • Ann Apps
        • Douglas Campbell
        • Ann Chapman
        • Gordon Dunsire
        • Tom Habing
        • Pete Johnston
        • John Phipps
        • Theo van Veen
        • Juha Hakala
    3. DCCAP Approval in March 2007
      • Comments
        • cld:isLocatedAt is a sub-property of dc:Relation: when dumbing down the AP to DC, it may not make sense
        • Cld:isLocatedAt vs cld:isAccessedVia vs dc:Identifier: traditional use of dc:Identifier to indicate the location. This could raise confusion, especially for physical vs digital collections
        • Usage of « metadata records » in the library –world meaning, instead of in the larger DCAM meaning
    4. NISO MetaSearch Initiative
      • NISO Standards Committee BB (Task Group 2): Collection & Service Descriptions developed a draft specification for collection description (see NISO Z39.91-200x, Collection Description Specification http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39-91-DSFTU.pdf
      • is meant to be used by vendors, libraries, archives, and other organizations who are providing access to collections through metasearch applications such as Z39.50, SRU, and the NISO Metasearch XML Gateway Protocol
      • Objective is to align with the current version of the DCCAP
    5. What we have to do
      • the NISO set is very similar to the August 2005 DC Collection Description
      • Mandatory elements not necessarily the same
      • Specificities:
        • Completeness
        • XML bindings
        • Terminologies
    6. Future
      • Correct (small) inconsistencies found in DC Collections Application Profile ( Oct 2007 ) - Sarah and Muriel
      • Consider Usage Board's comments in their review ( Oct 2007 ) - Task Group
      • Complete alignment of the NISO Collection Description Standard with the DC Collections Application Profile ( Oct 2007 ) - Sarah, Muriel, and Juha
      • Assess and align current DC Collections Application Profile with current version of Abstract Model and ongoing work on Description Set Profiles. ( DC 2008 ) Task Group
        • Alignment with the current Abstract Model by the spring Usage Board meeting
        • Alignment with the work on Description set profiles by DC2008

    + chessmuchessmu, 2 years ago

    custom

    641 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    talk, Singapour Dublin Core Conference, August 2008 more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 641
      • 641 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 2
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Tags