Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Political journalismlecture2013
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Political journalismlecture2013

186

Published on

This is a lecture on how political journalism is changing in the UK (and with some international case studies) as communications become more networked. It shows that people are given more voice to …

This is a lecture on how political journalism is changing in the UK (and with some international case studies) as communications become more networked. It shows that people are given more voice to question power but that there are limits on how much this is really changing politics or democracy. It uses the Clegg 'I'm sorry' episode to highlight the role of humour in this new environment.

Published in: Education, News & Politics
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
186
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Political journalism in the digital age Charlie Beckett MC417 November 2012 c.h.beckett@lse.ac.uk @CharlieBeckett
  • 2. • “…the joining of these two forces - the information revolution and the human urge to cooperate for justice - makes possible for the first time in history something we have only dreamt about: the creation of a truly global society. A global society where people anywhere and everywhere can discover their shared values, communicate with each other and do not need to meet or live next door to each other to join together with people in other countries in a single moral universe to bring about change….”
  • 3. Remaking the world with the Web?
  • 4. Remaking the world with the Web?
  • 5. • “It used to be thought – and I include myself in this – that help was on the horizon. New forms of communication would provide new outlets to by-pass the increasingly shrill tenor of traditional media. In fact, the new forms can be even more pernicious, less balanced, more intent on the latest conspiracy theory multiplied by five”
  • 6. • “It used to be thought – and I include myself in this – that help was on the horizon. New forms of communication would provide new outlets to by-pass the increasingly shrill tenor of traditional media. In fact, the new forms can be even more pernicious, less balanced, more intent on the latest conspiracy theory multiplied by five” • Tony Blair Reuters ‘feral beasts’ speech 2007
  • 7. How (analogue age) political journalism worked Power Media Public
  • 8. How networked political journalism works Power Media Public
  • 9. What changed? Old to New News Media Crude technology – Infinite technology Top down – consumer led Deadlines – 24/7 Barriers to entry – easy access Unreactive - Interactive Expensive - Cheap Single platform – Multi Platform Scarcity - abundance Profitable – Free
  • 10. Networked Journalism
  • 11. What changed? • Hypertextuality - connectivity • Interactivity & participation • Multi-mediality & diversity
  • 12. The song
  • 13. • In a world where humour can be more effective than reason, where does that leave the idea of an informed society? • In world where satire can be more effective than debate, where does that leave the idea of deliberation?
  • 14. What happens to these core functions of political journalism? • To inform • To foster debate • To present a critique and hold power to account
  • 15. The 47% video: citizen plus reporter
  • 16. The 47% make the news
  • 17. Nate Silver – a journalist who isn’t a journalist
  • 18. Non MSM Fora
  • 19. non-political political fora
  • 20. Non MSM Watchdog
  • 21. What difference? • • • • • More informed? More accountable? More open debate? More democratic media? More democratic politics?
  • 22. The real crisis is not authority but attention • • • • Trust – transparency - accountability Value – verification – utility Relevance – proximity – diversity Empowerment – investigative, disruptive, critical, reflexive, open

×