informing innovation at lauc-b 2009: part 2

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    informing innovation at lauc-b 2009: part 2 - Presentation Transcript

    1. LAUC-B Char Booth 2009 INFORMING INNOVATION UC Berkeley Tracking Student Interest in Library Technologies
    2. the questions. * ha s lib r ar y 2.0 and us/them think ing created a one- size-fit s all app r oach to technology develop ment? what motivates user s to integ ra te lib ra ries into their per sonal lear ning envir onments ?*
    3. breakout session. * generat ional assump ti ons li brary pred isposit ion implications for assessment & services
    4. investigating preconceptions. * generat ional assump ti ons immigrants natives uncomfortable Game players old and frightened Unafraid/fearless rigidinflexible Social/impatient wasting time Young and abrasive
    5. methodology. * investigate the actual technolog y and libr ar y use pa tterns/cultures of Ohio University students. env ir o nm e nt al sc a n Survey 1 Survey 2 time f ra m e Wi nt e r Q ua r t e r 2 0 0 7- 8 Sp ri n g Q u ar t er 2 0 0 8 55 o n l in e q ues t i on s , mo s tl y 22 o n l in e q ues t i on s , m ul t i pl e desi g n clos ed - f or m ( Li ke r t s c al e , m ul t . choi c e a nd o p en r es po ns e choi c e ) scop e te ch n o l og y a nd l i br a r y u s e lib r ar y us e a nd p er c e pt i on s 3,648 r es po n d ent s (1 8% o f 1,651 r es po n d ent s (8 % o f samp l e st ude nt bo d y ) st ude n t bo d y ) ince n ti v e 3 $100 p ri zes a w ar d ed 1 $100 p ri ze aw ar de d prom o ti o n all- s tu d en t e ma i l , l i b r ar y b l o g all- s tu d en t e ma i l , l i b r ar y b l o g anal y si s de s c ri pt i ve s , c ro ss ta b s cod ed v er ab a ti m r es po ns e s
    6. findings | demographics *age *gender *standing
    7. findings | time online per week u n d e r g ra d u a te g r a d u a te les s t h an 5 hou r s 4% 4% 6- 1 0 22% 18% 11- 2 0 33% 26% 21- 3 0 23% 21% 31- 4 0 10% 15% mor e t h an 4 0 7% 14%
    8. findings | time online per week u n d e r g ra d u a te g r a d u a te les s t h an 5 hou r s 4% 4% 6- 1 0 22% 18% 11- 2 0 33% 26% 21- 3 0 23% 21% 31- 4 0 10% 15% * mor e t h an 4 0 7% 14%
    9. findings | student technology ownership
    10. findings | use of emerging technologies by age age of respondent 1 7- 1 9 2 0- 2 2 2 3- 2 6 2 7- 3 0 31+ w e b c a l li n g 1 6% 1 8% 3 1% 4 0% 3 3% s e c o nd l i f e 5% 8% 1 2% 1 0% 1 0% blogs 1 5% 1 6% 2 3% 2 7% 2 0% w e b - b a s ed i m 7 1% 6 6% 5 9% 5 4% 4 3% p o d c as t s 2 9% 2 9% 3 5% 3 7% 4 1% t e x t in g 8 9% 8 5% 6 7% 5 8% 5 1% wikis 6 5% 7 1% 7 4% 7 3% 7 8% f a c e bo o k 9 4% 9 2% 7 6% 5 6% 3 5% m y s p ac e 4 0% 3 6% 3 6% 3 4% 1 9% f l i c kr 3% 4% 5% 1 4% 8% y o u t ub e 6 7% 6 3% 4 8% 3 4% 2 5% t w i t te r .3% .2% .7% 0% .5% d e l i ci o us .6% .8% 2% 2% 3%
    11. findings | use of emerging technologies by age age of respondent 1 7- 1 9 2 0- 2 2 2 3- 2 6 2 7- 3 0 31+ w e b c a l li n g 1 6% 1 8% 3 1% 4 0% 3 3% * s e c o nd l i f e 5% 8% 1 2% 1 0% 1 0% blogs 1 5% 1 6% 2 3% 2 7% 2 0% w e b - b a s ed i m 7 1% 6 6% 5 9% 5 4% 4 3% * p o d c as t s t e x t in g 2 9% 8 9% 2 9% 8 5% 3 5% 6 7% 3 7% 5 8% 4 1% 5 1% * wikis 6 5% 7 1% 7 4% 7 3% 7 8% f a c e bo o k 9 4% 9 2% 7 6% 5 6% 3 5% m y s p ac e 4 0% 3 6% 3 6% 3 4% 1 9% * f l i c kr 3% 4% 5% 1 4% 8% y o u t ub e 6 7% 6 3% 4 8% 3 4% 2 5% t w i t te r .3% .2% .7% 0% .5% * d e l i ci o us .6% .8% 2% 2% 3%
    12. findings | use of emerging technologies by age age of respondent 1 7- 1 9 2 0- 2 2 2 3- 2 6 2 7- 3 0 31+ w e b c a l li n g 1 6% 1 8% 3 1% 4 0% 3 3% s e c o nd l i f e 5% 8% 1 2% 1 0% 1 0% blogs 1 5% 1 6% 2 3% 2 7% 2 0% * w e b - b a s ed i m p o d c as t s 7 1% 2 9% 6 6% 2 9% 5 9% 3 5% 5 4% 3 7% 4 3% 4 1% * t e x t in g wikis 8 9% 6 5% 8 5% 7 1% 6 7% 7 4% 5 8% 7 3% 5 1% 7 8% f a c e bo o k 9 4% 9 2% 7 6% 5 6% 3 5% * m y s p ac e 4 0% 3 6% 3 6% 3 4% 1 9% f l i c kr 3% 4% 5% 1 4% 8% * y o u t ub e 6 7% 6 3% 4 8% 3 4% 2 5% t w i t te r .3% .2% .7% 0% .5% d e l i ci o us .6% .8% 2% 2% 3%
    13. findings | use of emerging technologies by age age of respondent 1 7- 1 9 2 0- 2 2 2 3- 2 6 2 7- 3 0 31+ w e b c a l li n g 1 6% 1 8% 3 1% 4 0% 3 3% s e c o nd l i f e 5% 8% 1 2% 1 0% 1 0% blogs 1 5% 1 6% 2 3% 2 7% 2 0% w e b - b a s ed i m 7 1% 6 6% 5 9% 5 4% 4 3% p o d c as t s 2 9% 2 9% 3 5% 3 7% 4 1% t e x t in g 8 9% 8 5% 6 7% 5 8% 5 1% wikis 6 5% 7 1% 7 4% 7 3% 7 8% f a c e bo o k 9 4% 9 2% 7 6% 5 6% 3 5% m y s p ac e 4 0% 3 6% 3 6% 3 4% 1 9% f l i c kr 3% 4% 5% 1 4% 8% y o u t ub e 6 7% 6 3% 4 8% 3 4% 2 5% * t w i t te r .3% .2% .7% 0% .5% d e l i ci o us .6% .8% 2% 2% 3%
    14. findings | relative technology unfamiliarity
    15. findings | google app use 17 - 1 9 20 - 2 2 23 - 2 6 27 - 3 0 31 + Se arc h 98% 97% 95% 98% 99% Im age s 66% 61% 54% 53% 37% Ma ps 47% 51% 62% 55% 51% Ne ws 21% 23% 21% 20% 23% Gm ai l 17% 25% 44% 47% 34% Sc hol ar 13% 20% 38% 40% 37% iG oog le 9% 9% 11% 11% 8% Do cum ent s 8% 10% 15% 20% 20% Bo ok s 5% 6% 14% 16% 11% Ta lk 3% 4% 12% 12% 8% Bl og S ea rc h 2% 2% 4% 4% 6% Pi cas a 2% 5% 13% 9% 8% Re ade r 1% 2% 3% 6% 3%
    16. findings | in-person and virtual library use library web visits library computer use library visits
    17. findings | open-ended library assessment
    18. findings | library vs. research skill
    19. findings | awareness of library services
    20. findings | library technology receptivity
    21. findings | library technology receptivity Digital Status Academic Status n a t i ve i m m i gr a nt u n d e rg r ad u a t e g r a d ua t e Very r e ce p t i ve 23% 42% 23% 33% S o m e wh a t r e c ep t iv e 53% 47% 53% 45% N o t r e c ep t i v e 24% 11% 24% 22%
    22. findings | library predisposition Digital Status Academic Status n a t i ve i m m i gr a nt u n d e rg r ad u a t e g r a d ua t e * Very r e ce p t i ve S o m e wh a t r e c ep t iv e 23% 53% 42% 47% 23% 53% 33% 45% * N o t r e c ep t i v e 24% 11% 24% 22% * * *
    23. findings | priceless verbatim comments “Two words - air con dition ing.” “The librar y kin d of sm ells.” “The ‘stack floors ’ are cre ep y.” “Mor e stab le s for pe op le to stu dy at.” “Constan t talks to stu de nts as how to acc ess libra ry resourc es.” “Prom ote librar y ser vic es more !!”
    24. implementation | skype Skype a librarian & video kiosk low use/i nterest st affing is sues … creepy? under ev al uat io n
    25. implementation | mobile access mobile library website low current interest hi gh growt h area tech innova t ing push servi ce?
    26. implementation | texting OPAC texting services hi gher int eres t ea sier to imp l ement push to 1st years launchi ng soo n
    27. implementation | second life Second Life low st udent use AD A potent ia l ca mp us interest surv ey hi ndsi ght
    28. implementation | browser add-ons Firefox library toolbars pra cti ca l hi ghest int eres t new itera ti ons st udent s unaw are
    29. implementation | social networking Facebook library page hi gh int erest div id ed opi nion “conveni ence ” ea sy to mai nta i n
    30. implementation | non-tech related facility-based changes lat e access po li cy com put ers & print ing quiet spa ce & ho urs bull eti n bo ard s, et c.
    31. implementation | non-tech related marketing/advertising low awareness sha re survey result s out rea ch st rat egies si gna ge
    32. the point. * und ersta nding local patr on cultur es is essentia l to cr ea ting used and useful (technolog y) ser vices. envir onmenta l scan ning is a scalab le mea ns of investig ating need s and per ceptions.*
    33. the point. qu estion gene rational in vestigate loc al assu m ption s patron cultur es takeaways promote emerging use data to services inf or m dec ision s
    34. Q/A * cha r boot h e-learning li brarian | uc berk eley cboot h@li brary .berkeley .edu report: ti nyurl.com/i i-b ooth | bl og: infomat ional.com

    + char boothchar booth, 3 weeks ago

    custom

    89 views, 1 favs, 2 embeds more stats

    Part 2 of a 2-part presentation at the LAUC-B 2009 more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 89
      • 81 on SlideShare
      • 8 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds
    • 7 views on http://infomational.wordpress.com
    • 1 views on https://allwordofmouth.wordpress.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 7 views on http://infomational.wordpress.com
    • 1 views on https://allwordofmouth.wordpress.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories