EARLY RECOGNITION OF SEPSISEARLY RECOGNITION OF SEPSIS
IN THE EMERGENCYIN THE EMERGENCY
DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT
Nanette Kent ...
Sharp Grossmont Hospital
• The largest and most
comprehensive health-care
facility in East San Diego
County
• Covering 750...
PICO Question:
In the Emergency Department, does the
implementation of an assessment tool for
identifying sepsis patients,...
Sepsis
• Severe sepsis
– Acute organ dysfunction secondary to
infection
• Septic Shock
– Severe sepsis plus hypotension no...
Surviving Sepsis Campaign
• Initiated in 2003 by the European
Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the
International Sepsis...
Surviving Sepsis Campaign
• Sepsis is a major cause of mortality,
killing approximately 1,400 people
worldwide every day, ...
Sharp Grossmont
Hospital
Sepsis Tool
Sharp Grossmont
Hospital
Sepsis Algorithm
EBP OBJECTIVES
To utilize a screening tool that will lead
to increased recognition and early
treatment of sepsis in the Em...
METHODS
• Staff were educated in the utilization of the
sepsis screening tool.
• Staff were given additional education in ...
Sharp Grossmont
Hospital
RevisedSepsis
Screening Tool
METHODS
• First section screens for SIRS
– SIRS includes objective vital signs data:
• Temperature ≥ 100.4 or ≤ 96.8 F
• H...
METHODS
• Second section screens for infection
– The patient is screened for infection if they
have SIRS
• Does the patien...
METHODS
• Third section screens for Organ
Dysfunction
• Respiratory: SaO2 < 90 %
• Cardiovascular: SBP < 90
• Renal: urine...
METHODS
The RN then approaches the ERMD,
informing him using SBAR technique,
that the patient has screened positive
for se...
SBAR Communication Technique
• Situation:
– Screened positive for severe sepsis
• Background:
– Positive for SIRS (describ...
SBAR Communication Technique
• Recommendation:
– I need you to come and evaluate the patient
to confirm if they have sever...
Initial Data Collection
• Baseline data - Concurrent audits of 200
patients were completed utilizing the
screening tool.
•...
Results
57
42
3 2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Sepsis Screening Tool (Baseline)
SIRS
Infection
Organ Dysfunction
Severe Sepsis
N = ...
Post Implementation
Data Collection
• Staff utilized the screening tool on all
patients, regardless of chief complaint or
...
Results
N = 206
32
13
5
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Sepsis Screening Tool
(Post Education)
SIRS
Infection
Organ Dysfunction
Se...
Results
N = 206
4 4
3
0
1
2
3
4
Sepsis Screening Tool
(Post Education)
SBAR Commnication
Additonal Labs
IV Fluid Bolus
Conclusion
• Baseline data
– Three patients qualified for complete utilization of
the screening tool.
• Post education
– F...
Next Step
– Incorporation of the screening tool into
EMSTAT electronic charting.
– Utilization of the tool during the tria...
Questions…?
Thank you
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Early Recognition of Sepsis in the Emergency Department

2,386

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,386
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
88
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • I added the Baldrige and Magnet logo
  • I reviewed the bullet
  • Changed developed to initiated
  • Added EBP to the title
  • You could show the tool in this slide. You could speak about the tool and omit slide 16, 17 and 18.
  • I changed “box” to “section”.
  • Transcript of "Early Recognition of Sepsis in the Emergency Department"

    1. 1. EARLY RECOGNITION OF SEPSISEARLY RECOGNITION OF SEPSIS IN THE EMERGENCYIN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT Nanette Kent RN, BSN Senior Specialist Emergency Department, EBPI Fellow Tonia McCoy, RN MSN, Senior Specialist Emergency Department, EBPI Mentor
    2. 2. Sharp Grossmont Hospital • The largest and most comprehensive health-care facility in East San Diego County • Covering 750 square miles. • Currently licensed for 446 bed – Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award – Magnet designated • Busiest ED in San Diego County – 80,000 patients per year – Average 225 patients per day
    3. 3. PICO Question: In the Emergency Department, does the implementation of an assessment tool for identifying sepsis patients, with the utilization of SBAR communication, when compared to the current practice of following the Sepsis Early Recognition Algorithm for Goal Directed Therapy increase early recognition of sepsis?
    4. 4. Sepsis • Severe sepsis – Acute organ dysfunction secondary to infection • Septic Shock – Severe sepsis plus hypotension not reversed with fluid resuscitation – 25 % mortality
    5. 5. Surviving Sepsis Campaign • Initiated in 2003 by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the International Sepsis Forum, and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. • Critical care and Infections Disease experts representing 11 international organizations. • Developed guidelines that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician.
    6. 6. Surviving Sepsis Campaign • Sepsis is a major cause of mortality, killing approximately 1,400 people worldwide every day, Surviving Sepsis Campaign (2008). • In the Emergency Department at SGH, the algorithm for Early Goal Directed Therapy for Sepsis has not been consistently instituted.
    7. 7. Sharp Grossmont Hospital Sepsis Tool
    8. 8. Sharp Grossmont Hospital Sepsis Algorithm
    9. 9. EBP OBJECTIVES To utilize a screening tool that will lead to increased recognition and early treatment of sepsis in the Emergency Department.
    10. 10. METHODS • Staff were educated in the utilization of the sepsis screening tool. • Staff were given additional education in the current sepsis algorithm. • The tool screened for: – SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) – Infection – Organ Dysfunction – Severe Sepsis
    11. 11. Sharp Grossmont Hospital RevisedSepsis Screening Tool
    12. 12. METHODS • First section screens for SIRS – SIRS includes objective vital signs data: • Temperature ≥ 100.4 or ≤ 96.8 F • Heart Rate ≥ 90 • Respiratory Rate ≥ 20 • WBC count ≥ 12,000 or ≤ 4,000, or greater than 0.5K/uL bands – If the patient has 2 or more of the above, they screen positive for SIRS
    13. 13. METHODS • Second section screens for infection – The patient is screened for infection if they have SIRS • Does the patient have suspected or documented infection? • Has the patient received antibiotics (not prophylaxis)? – If one of the above is confirmed, the patient is screened for organ dysfunction
    14. 14. METHODS • Third section screens for Organ Dysfunction • Respiratory: SaO2 < 90 % • Cardiovascular: SBP < 90 • Renal: urine output < 0.5ml/hr; creatinine increase > 0.5mg/dl from baseline • CNS: altered LOC, Glascow coma scale ≤ 5 • Any one of the above, in addition to positive results from sections 1 and 2, indicates severe sepsis.
    15. 15. METHODS The RN then approaches the ERMD, informing him using SBAR technique, that the patient has screened positive for severe sepsis.
    16. 16. SBAR Communication Technique • Situation: – Screened positive for severe sepsis • Background: – Positive for SIRS (describe) – Known or suspected infection – Organ dysfunction (describe) • Assessment: – Share complete VS and SaO2
    17. 17. SBAR Communication Technique • Recommendation: – I need you to come and evaluate the patient to confirm if they have severe sepsis. – It is recommended that I get an ABG, lactate, and CBC, Can I proceed and get these? – Any other labs you would like me to obtain? – If the pt is hypotensive: Can I start an IV and give a bolus of NS – 20 ml/kg?
    18. 18. Initial Data Collection • Baseline data - Concurrent audits of 200 patients were completed utilizing the screening tool. • Random audits on Emergency Department patients were performed.
    19. 19. Results 57 42 3 2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Sepsis Screening Tool (Baseline) SIRS Infection Organ Dysfunction Severe Sepsis N = 200
    20. 20. Post Implementation Data Collection • Staff utilized the screening tool on all patients, regardless of chief complaint or presentation. • A total of 206 patients were screened.
    21. 21. Results N = 206 32 13 5 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Sepsis Screening Tool (Post Education) SIRS Infection Organ Dysfunction Severe Sepsis N = 206
    22. 22. Results N = 206 4 4 3 0 1 2 3 4 Sepsis Screening Tool (Post Education) SBAR Commnication Additonal Labs IV Fluid Bolus
    23. 23. Conclusion • Baseline data – Three patients qualified for complete utilization of the screening tool. • Post education – Five patients screened positive for utilization of the screening tool. – Four received additional treatment • There is a two-times greater chance of receiving appropriate treatment for sepsis with utilization of the sepsis screening tool.
    24. 24. Next Step – Incorporation of the screening tool into EMSTAT electronic charting. – Utilization of the tool during the triage assessment. – Possibility of implementation of a " sepsis code " when patients present with SIRS symptoms at triage.
    25. 25. Questions…? Thank you
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×