Sample presentation (edited to maintain confidentiality) with a complete strategy assessment, current situational analysis, context framing, identification of pressure points, applicable recommendation, along with a realistic action plan that includes low-cost databases, and in a package that ends with energy to achieve results.
Presented to the board of directors during a strategy session at the Canadian Liver Foundation in Vancouver, BC - a non-profit which I volunteer my spare time to.
1. Membership Drives Everything
A discipline grounded in real research and real results
1 Edited for public (some material has been removed to
maintain confidentiality)
2. AGENDA
What’s happening in and around us?
What should we do about it?
Current environment
Need for a stronger membership base
What members want
2 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
3. What’s happening in and around us?
External
• Economic uncertainty
• Mass competition
Internal
• <confidential>
3 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
4. What should we do about it?
Selling impact
Nurturing
Transparency
members
Members
4 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
5. Current environment
5 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
6. Current environment
Donations have been declining
2007 2008 2009
Amount (in $
billions) $8.65 $8.19 $7.75
% change from
year prior -5.3% -5.4%
Number of Canadians reporting donations on their
taxes have been declining since 1990
23.1% of Canadians were donors in 2009 versus
24.1% in 2008
6 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain
confidentiality)
7. Recent trends
<confidential>
7 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
8. Current environment
Demand for charity “accountability” is growing
Increased media focus on charity effectiveness
Donors demanding more control and involvement
Charity rankings becoming more widespread
8 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain
confidentiality)
9. Current environment
9 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain
confidentiality)
10. What does this all mean?
Increased competition
Stakeholders want to associate with NPO showing
value
More exposure if positioned correctly
10 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
12. Need for a strong membership base
<confidential>
12 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
13. Need for a strong membership base
Why a strong membership base?
Key Success
A membership base drives everything
Factor
Corporate
Sponsors
Government Media
Donor Base
(Members)
13 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
14. Need for a strong membership base
“Strong charities have a solid base of individual
donors”
“Strategically important to build a base of
donors who give regularly and in response to a
cause”
- Scotiabank Philanthropic Advisory Forum
14 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
15. Need for strong membership base
<confidential>
15 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
16. Need for strong membership base
Cygnus Applied
Research reports:
Acquisition is more
expensive than retention
and often at a loss
Focus on boosting donor
retention
16 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
17. Need for strong membership base
Customers leave for many reasons
Geographic move
Death
Wooed away by competition
#1 Reason: they simply feel you don’t care enough
about them
17 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
18. Members want to help
“The essential ingredient in forming productive
engagements is to create ways for stakeholders to
provide candid feedback to the foundation about its
grantmaking practices and approach.”
18 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
19. Members’ wants
19 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
20. Plan of action
1. Establish monthly newsletter
2. Generate more information sharing
3. Establish effective database
4. Emphasis on past stakeholders over new ones
20 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
21. What do we do with members?
Research shows that donors don’t want
formal recognition, just information.
Prompt gift acknowledgement
Confidence their gifts are “working” as intended
Measurable results of gifts at work before another
gift is requested
21 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
22. How do we manage members?
Inexpensive databases to manage members
effectively
• $50 per month for up to 100 members
• Marketing using email
• Marketing via social media
• Donations, and more
• $25 per month for up to 250 members
• Automated applications and renewals
• Newsletters and email blasts
• Member self-service, and more
22 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
23. Thank You
23 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
24. Questions?
24 Edited for public (some material has been removed to maintain confidentiality)
Editor's Notes
I am asking the board and everyone involved with our offices to focus on members and customer retention before acquiring new stakeholders.We do that by actively engaging our members promptly, opening channels of communication (using technology more and more to reduce more costly means such as snail mail), and measuring and delivering results before asking for another one.
So I want to begin by creating the context in which we operate.
Demand for charity “accountability” is growingSimply put, donors want to know: how their donations were spent.