Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

SES Chicago 2010 Advanced Paid Search - by Andrew Goodman

on

  • 625 views

SES Chicago 2010: Andrew Goodman's slide deck from the ADVANCED PAID SEARCH TACTICS session. This session covered campaign expansion techniques, advanced ad testing, advanced auction theory, the ...

SES Chicago 2010: Andrew Goodman's slide deck from the ADVANCED PAID SEARCH TACTICS session. This session covered campaign expansion techniques, advanced ad testing, advanced auction theory, the proper use of relevant analytics reports, ideas for bid rules and campaign automation including automating the detection of PPC scam campaigns that can divert traffic away from the legitimate brand site and increase campaign costs.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
625
Views on SlideShare
625
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

SES Chicago 2010 Advanced Paid Search - by Andrew Goodman Presentation Transcript

  • 1. “You’re underthinking, dude”: Getting beyond the basics in PPC SES Chicago OCTOBER 2010 ANDREW GOODMAN
  • 2. Outline: 1. Brain stuff 2. Advanced ad testing 3. New features 4. New formats
  • 3. Smart vs. rational
  • 4. Why Smart People Can Have Stupid AdWords Accounts “In effect, all animals are under stringent selection pressure to be as stupid as they can get away with.” Richerson & Boyd, Not by Genes Alone, 2005 Dysrationalia – term coined by Keith Stanovich, What Intelligence Tests Miss
  • 5. The “wisdom of crowds” is just a popular way of expressing a pretty old idea in organization science: RATIONAL OUTCOMES don’t immediately flow from the aptitudes of one or two seemingly bright folks
  • 6. Rules, or random? Transform your routines.
  • 7. Define “actionable”? I have a dream
  • 8. Your rules, your way: note 6 separate custom settings
  • 9. Google AdWords Conversion Optimizer
  • 10. The tight leash problem What if you could program your Analytics software to look for high CPA’s on every conceivable segment, & scale back bids? The bias would be against volume You’d punish randomly bad behavior Wouldn’t be patient enough to benefit from random goodness
  • 11. Quality Score: Bare bones
  • 12. Quality Score Promotes Relevance Ad Position determined by AdRank AdRank = QS X Max Bid, by keyword Quality Scores recomputed each query, each auction Makes money for Google Makes search users happy New accounts need to establish history
  • 13. Dead Simple Takeaways (QS) Many thorny problems with low Quality Score result from adding keywords that are “just off” the searcher’s true intent Keyword tools can be misused like any other tool A real pro shapes and moulds keyword selection and account structure to maximize QS Once the account is mature and generating healthy ROI, feel free to broaden out, seeking volume & trading off (some) relevancy At this point Google’s “confidence level” in account is high
  • 14. Ad testing for a prosperous future © 2010, The Goodman Institute
  • 15. What makes ads “work”? Multiple drivers of clickthrough and the art of “why”
  • 16. Beautiful, wonderful ad (and how we got there)
  • 17. Managing ads to ROI: CTR or CPO?
  • 18. GENETIC FREAKS
  • 19. Ad testing: finding the “double winner” What is the “double winner”? The rare ad that pulls higher CTR’s without hurting ROI In landing page testing, one of the only ways to hit on the “killer permutation” is to test many variations using multivariate testing The same goes for ad copy testing Make the big wins first Move to MV testing Highest possible CTR’s on ads are paramount; affects all keyword CTR’s; and thus affects account-wide QS
  • 20. Key steps towards better ads Better campaign organization = tighter targeting (info scent) A better ad is a higher-ROI ad? Or not!? Tests must be statistically significant Find initial triggers through A/B/C tests Record hypotheses & results Second stage: refinement (multivariate testing) Keep focused on “double win” genetic freaks Master the art of “why”
  • 21. Multivariate Ad Testing Setup For high volume accounts (manual version)
  • 22. Quality Score Booster Create a micro promotion that boosts QS Ordinary words like “plumber reviews” get pretty good QS Super targeted event promos like “Toronto home show” discounted tickets get very high CTR’s Even if only a break-even proposition, do more of these to inexpensively “greenlight” entire account (no downside!) --
  • 23. Account refinement musts
  • 24. Networks – placements & exclusions
  • 25. Search query report: exclusions & ideas
  • 26. New features -Bid Simulator -Campaign Experiments -Remarketing
  • 27. Understanding the Impact of Ad Position: Bid Simulator
  • 28. AdWords Campaign Experiments Yowza!
  • 29. AdWords Campaign Experiments cont’d
  • 30. Scenario: Pretty interested… but wandered off…
  • 31. Remarketing Case Study Remarketing drove the highest conversion rate and the lowest CPA for Nexus One Display Campaign • Conversion rate for remarketing was 2.3x higher than the account average and CPA was 2.4x lower • Display ads performed the best. Remarketing display had 3.2x higher conversion rate than the account average for display. • Due to high performance, the team roughly tripled the remarketing budget in 3 months
  • 32. Keepin’ em honest: PZ’s own study Client in retail food products Initial test: cautious; brand queries; 5 month test Result: Conversion rate about half the conversion rate in that search ad group, which is *very high* Conversion rate much higher than avg. for display Second test on more granular ad groups Conversion rate: 9%. Much higher than typical for display! CPA 80% lower than allowables for those groups! Conclusion: “nagging effect” works for cart abandoners who still have medium-high intent – remarketing rocks!!
  • 33. Thanks! @andrew_goodman