NextGen 2011 David Clarkson OFCOM


Published on

NextGen Conference Bristol 15 Nov 2011

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

NextGen 2011 David Clarkson OFCOM

  1. 1. NextGen 11 Conference, Bristol, 15-16 NovemberUK Broadband Regulatory FrameworkDavid Clarkson16th November 2011
  2. 2. Contents•  Current generation broadband•  NGA/super-fast broadband deployment plans•  NGA investment challenge•  Regulatory framework - promoting investment and competition•  Current situation 1
  3. 3. Current generation broadband•  LLU and cable both provide strong competition to BT in the UK – but only in certain areas –  Cable coverage c.50% –  LLU coverage c.89% Market  1•  This has resulted in the development of sub-national Market  2 markets and geographic regulation Market  3 Hull  Area –  Market 1 (11.7%), BT only - access regulation, cost orientation and proposed charge control (still to be finalised) –  Market 2 (10%), 2/3 operators - access regulation and cost orientation –  Market 3 (77.6%), 4 or more operators – no regulation•  Current generation broadband will continue to have a significant role over the next few years –  Regulatory framework has to continue to support current generation broadband whilst allowing a transition to NGA 2
  4. 4. NGA/Super-fast broadband public deployment plansBT•  Plans to deploy NGA to 66% of UK by 2014•  Mix of FTTC and FTTH planned, 75% FTTC / 25% FTTH expected•  Areas covered expected to largely overlap existing cable and LLU deploymentsVirgin Media•  Completed upgrade to DOCSIS 3.0 in mid 2009 across entire network (c.50% of UK)•  Started offering 50Mbit/s services in Dec 2008•  Started offering 100Mbit/s services in Oct 2010•  Has been trailing 200Mbit/s and testing network up to 1.5 Gbit/s•  Has been incrementally extending footprint of its cable networkOthers•  Majority of new builds now install FTTH•  Increasing number of local initiatives, both private and public 3
  5. 5. NGA investment challenge•  High capital costs and limited incremental revenue make the investment case for FTTC look marginal•  Despite the longer investment horizon for FTTH costs, annual costs per line for FTTH are still approx 3-4 times higher than FTTC, and the revenue premium is uncertain FTTC and FTTH revenues and costs per subscriber per yearNotes and assumptions £4501.  Source of data: Analysys Mason for BSG, 2008 £4002.  FTTH GPON topology3.  Cost of capital 12% £3504.  Only access included £300 £250 £200 Premium £150 ? £100 £50 £0 FTTC FTTC Costs FTTC Costs FTTC Costs FTTH FTTH Costs Revenue (Take up 20%) (Take up 30%) (Take up 40%) Revenue (Take up 30%) 4
  6. 6. Regulatory framework - promoting investment andcompetitionPromoting investment – SLU and PIA•  We primarily see Sub-Loop Unbundling (SLU) and Passive Infrastructure Access (PIA) as a means to promote investment in NGA. The intention is to make such investment contestable by operators other than BT•  But the investment case is challenging. It is unlikely that we will see the deployment of multiple NGA networks based on SLU/PIA in the same area in the next few years. These remedies are therefore unlikely to be the basis for competition in the next few yearsPromoting competition – LLU and VULA•  In areas where BT has deployed NGA, we expect competition to be based on access to BT’s network using Virtual Unbundled Local Access (VULA) –  BT is required to provide wholesale access to its NGA network (FTTC and FTTH) on an equivalent basis, however we have not required cost orientation or set a charge control•  We believe that Local Loop Unbundling will continue to be the primary basis for competition in current generation services over the next few years PIA = duct and pole access 5
  7. 7. The implications and use of our remedies are likely tovary in different locations Current & Likely longer Nearer term remedies focus planned term focus networks “1st Half” (urban, c.50%) Wavelength Virtual or fibre Access unbundling? “Middle bit” Future focus likely to be(sub-urban, c.16%) driven by shift from FTTC to FTTH and emergence of viable NGA unbundling Local / regional options initiatives Duct Duct “Final third” & wireless SLU and (rural, c.33%) Pole /other pole Access access 6
  8. 8. Current situationCompetition (areas where BT has deployed NGA)•  Many providers have now signed up to use VULA (aka Generic Ethernet Access)•  Take-up of BT’s NGA products stood at c.300k at end September 2011 (coverage at that time was about 6m homes – all FTTC)•  BT Retail is by far the biggest user of VULA/GEAInvestment (areas where no NGA exists)•  At the current time, apart from a couple of very small schemes, there is little interest in the commercial deployment of NGA based on SLU and/or PIAState funding (the ‘Final Third’)•  The UK government has set aside £530m to support the deployment of NGA in the Final Third in the period to 2015 – four pilot trials are currently under way•  Several separate state-funded schemes also in development – South Yorkshire, Cornwall•  Currently, the only real interest in SLU and PIA is to enable competitive providers to bid for state funded schemes (potentially makes state funds more contestable) - e.g. Fujitsu 7
  9. 9. Questions 8