Tagging in government institutions

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    9 Favorites

    Tagging in government institutions - Presentation Transcript

    1. The Introduction of Folksonomies in Government Institutions GovCamp Brussels – 21 September 2006 Céline Van Damme [email_address]
    2. Structure of the talk
      • Folksonomies on the WWW
      • Folksonomies in enterprises
      • Folksonomies in Government Institutions
    3. Structure of the talk
      • Folksonomies on the WWW
      • Folksonomies in enterprises
      • Folksonomies in Government Institutions
    4. Folksonomies on the WWW(1)
      • New trend on WWW
      • Users are creating metadata by adding tags to content
      • Consolidation leads to a bottom-up taxonomy = folksonomy
      • Examples: Delicious (bookmarks), Flickr (Photos)
    5. Folksonomies on the WWW(2)
      • Very popular:retrieving content in an easy way
      • New York Times Magazine mentioned folksonomies as one of 2005’s best ideas
      • Semantic web development
    6. Structure of the talk
      • Folksonomies on the WWW
      • Folksonomies in enterprises
      • Folksonomies in Government Institutions
    7. Folksonomies in enterprises
      • Example: IBM
      • Gartner predicts: “ Corporate Intelligence will become one of the emergent technologies in the next 5 or 10 years which will have a transformational impact on business ”
      • Why not introducing it in government institutions?
    8. Structure of the talk
      • Folksonomies on the WWW
      • Folksonomies in enterprises
      • Folksonomies in Government Institutions
    9. Folksonomies in Government Institutions
      • Retrieving Content
      • Finding Experts
      • Document Recommendation
      • Improving or creating Taxonomy/Ontology
    10. Folksonomies in Government Institutions
      • Retrieving Content
      • Finding Experts
      • Document Recommendation
      • Improving or creating Taxonomy/Ontology
    11. Retrieving Content A. Intranet Internet Technology: WWW Intranet Infoglut Increasing # of web pages Social software Electronic Documents (Pdf, doc etc) Folksonomies Semantic Web B. Other: CMS, DB with unstructured information
    12. Folksonomies in Government Institutions
      • Retrieving Content
      • Finding Experts
      • Document Recommendation
      • Improving or creating Taxonomy/Ontology
    13. Finding Experts (1)
      • Implicit Tagging
      • Based on tagging activity of content
      • Tags are a reflection of knowledge
      • Explicit Tagging
      • Let people tag their colleagues (e.g. when receiving an e-mail)
      • Weights: reciprocity
      • Implicit + Explicit Tagging
      • Let people tag content + colleagues  match
    14. Finding Experts (2)
      • Advantages
      • Government institutions employ many people  impossible to know everybody
      • Setting up a meeting
      • Setting up a community
      • E-mails
    15. Folksonomies in Government Institutions
      • Retrieving Content
      • Finding Experts
      • Document Recommendation
      • Improving or creating Taxonomy/Ontology
    16. Document Recommendation
      • Tags are a good reflection of knowledge and interests
      • Experts are reading high quality documents
      • Experts are good at describing documents with concepts
      •  Push/Pull Recommendation
    17. Folksonomies in Government Institutions
      • Retrieving Content
      • Finding Experts
      • Document Recommendation
      • Improving or creating Taxonomy/Ontology
    18. Improving or creating Taxonomy/Ontology
      • Folksonomies
      • S = direct reflection user’s vocabulary
      • W = no synonym control
      • Taxonomy/ontology
      • S = controlled vocabulary/concepts
      • W =time consuming + expensive
      •  Opportunity = offset the weaknesses of formal semantics (ontology) with the strengths of informal semantics (folksonomy) and vice versa
    19. References
      • Van Damme, Céline. Folksonomies and Enterprise Folksonomies. Vrije Universiteit Brussel. (2006)
      • Harris Wu, Mohammed Zubair, Kurt Maly. Harvesting social knowledge from folksonomies. Proceedings of the seventh conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia HYPERTEXT ’06 (August 2006). pp 111-114.
      • Farrell Stephen, Lau Tessa. Fringe Contacts: People-tagging for the enterprise. WWW2006 (May 2006).
      • URL: http://www.rawsugar.com/www2006/25.pdf#search=%22Fringe%20Contacts%3A%20People-tagging%20for%20the%20enterprise%22
      • John Ajita, Seligmann Dorée. Collaborative tagging and expertise in the enterprise. WWW2006 (May 2006). URL: http://www.rawsugar.com/www2006/26.pdf#search=%22Collaborative%20tagging%20and%20expertise%20in%20the%20enterprise%20%22
      • Gartner Research Group (2006) Gartner's 2006 Emerging Technologies Hype Cycle Highlights Key Technology Themes. URL: http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=495475

    + celinevandammecelinevandamme, 4 years ago

    custom

    2306 views, 9 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 2306
      • 2297 on SlideShare
      • 9 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 9
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 9 views on http://www.knosos.be

    more

    All embeds
    • 9 views on http://www.knosos.be

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories