Internet Intermediaries - Does one definition fit all ?

1,539 views
1,361 views

Published on

The expression 'internet intermediary' is broadly used to describe operators offering various services on the Internet. However, these services can differ considerably and depending on the specific service offered, the operator may be more or less actively involved in treating data. During this WIPO conference, I was invited to describe some of the existing forms of internet intermediaries, to what extent they actively or passively handle data and how this potentially impacts on trademark rights.

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,539
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
14
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Internet Intermediaries - Does one definition fit all ?

  1. 1. Internet Intermediaries:Does One Definition Fit All? Information Meeting on the Role and Responsibility of Internet Intermediaries in the Field of Trademarks, WIPO, September 17, 2012 Prof. Cédric Manara EDHEC Business School [LegalEDHEC Research Center] <www.cedricmanara.com >
  2. 2. Definition “Internet intermediaries bring together or facilitate transactions between third parties on the Internet. They give access to, host, transmit and index content, products and services originated by third parties on the Internet or provide Internet-based services to third parties” • OECD, The economic and social role of internet intermediaries, 2010 3
  3. 3. Who?How? Where? What? 4
  4. 4. Who? Internet Access Providers • Orange, Comcast… • Libraries / Companies / Universities / Conference centers… Registries / Registrars • Verisign… / GoDaddy… Internet Service Providers • Amateur platforms ─ Forums, blogs, wikis • Commercial platforms ─ eBay  Craigslist • Generative platforms ─ open: YouTube, SL… ─ v. proprietary: Facebook, App Store… • Search tools Payment systems operators • PayPal, Visa… 5
  5. 5. Where? (is the information stored) DNS • [+ .tel case] Own infrastructure Third parties’ servers • Cogent, Amazon AWS… • Capacity to intervene on the content • Dependence 6
  6. 6. Where? (is the intermediary located) States with an exemption regime • EU, US… Countries without specific rules • Effectiveness ─ e.g. (©) Napster  Allofmp3.ru 7
  7. 7. What? (do they store) Features • Technical nature: always bits! • Formats: text, image, audio, code… ─ Representation of products: eBay, Rakuten ─ Digital products or services: iTunes Store, Google Play • Size: from one pixel to the whole web • Content origin ─ Themselves: On-demand video / music / e-books ─ Clients: commercial, amateur, hybrid ─ (or both) • Monitoring ability / TM filters • Difference in the liability regime  TM 8
  8. 8. Digital content / Physical products 9
  9. 9. [Paris Court of First Instance, Google Books, Dec. 18, 2009] “no commercial use of the signs considered here is being carried out by the service in question since their only purpose is to inform the user of the identity of the publisher of the work mentioned in the results of his search, designating a publishing activity, whether of books or magazines, of borrowing books or a cultural activity” 10
  10. 10. What? (business categories) B2B, B2C, C2C, B2B2C platforms Revenues • Free (advertising revenues) • Fixed prices / Auction • Multiple actors  personal liability 11
  11. 11. What? (else) Search tools Advertising intermediaries Social media variety 12
  12. 12. How? (attitudes towards TM protection) Disparity in means • Existence or absence of Terms of Use • In-house team to handle trademark disputes? Disparity in (re)action • Duty of care 13
  13. 13. Diverging policies [0]
  14. 14. Diverging policies [1] 15
  15. 15. Diverging policies [2] 16
  16. 16. ToS of 10 social media Provisions related to brand protection Social media concernedClause prohibiting any conduct that may violate the rights of Wikipedia, YouTube, Blogger, World of others or be contrary to any existing laws or regulations WarcraftClause expressly prohibiting the use of trademarks belonging Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, SkyBlog, to others Second Life, LinkedIn, World of Warcraft Wikipedia, Facebook, MySpace, Twitter,Clause allowing the publisher of the site to remove content Blogger, Skyblog, YouTube, LinkedIn, World liable to infringe trademark rights of Warcraft, Second Life Wikipedia, Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, Clause allowing the publisher of the site to close user Blogger, Skyblog, YouTube, LinkedIn, Worldaccounts in the event of behavior infringing trademark rights of Warcraft, Second LifeClause through which the publisher of the site disclaims any Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, Blogger, responsibility for content (and makes the user wholly Skyblog, YouTube, LinkedIn, World of responsible) Warcraft, Second Life Existence of an online reporting procedure for litigious Wikipedia, MySpace, YouTube, Blogger, content SkyBlog Existence of an online reporting procedure specifically for Facebook, Twitter, Second Life, LinkedIn infringement of trademark rightsClause prohibiting companies from promoting brands or using a personal profile for commercial ends (except with the Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, Skyblog possible authorization of the site publisher) 17
  17. 17. Provisions can be exorbitant Most of the ToS expressly forbid the use a of a third party trademark • or any behavior which may violate third parties rights ToS often go beyond legal provisions • e.g. (France) Price Minister  eBay 18
  18. 18. Provisions can be vague “It is often difficult to tell what may or may not be trademarked” “However, use of designer logos and brand names without permission, such as Gucci, Nike, Louis Vuiton [sic !], etc., is usually not acceptable” 19
  19. 19. In summary Internet intermediaries are extremely diverse … like the internet! Actionability depends on • who/when they are • what/how they do 20

×