### SlideShare for iOS

by Linkedin Corporation

FREE - On the App Store

Presentation of the conclusions of a research internship at TUM carried out in 2010. ...

Presentation of the conclusions of a research internship at TUM carried out in 2010.

The scour phenomenon is the fact that around marine structures embedded into the sediment bed, vortices are created which "scour", that is, erode the sediment bed and thus make the structure vulnerable. This study shows that experiments and empirical formulas produced by different researchers around the world show biases linked to their different experimental settings, relatively to the water inlet conditions.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

- Total Views
- 210
- Views on SlideShare
- 210
- Embed Views

- Likes
- 0
- Downloads
- 2
- Comments
- 0

No embeds

- 1. 1Investigation on the influence ofthe inlet conditions on the scouringprocessStudent : Cédric Bellet ENPC 2010School tutor: Michel Benoit
- 2. 2 ENPC 2010Introduction• What is the scouring process?• Research on the scouring process• What is an inlet condition?
- 3. 3 ENPC 2010Introduction• What is the scouring process?• Research on the scouring process• What is an inlet condition?
- 4. 4 ENPC 2010Introduction
- 5. 5 ENPC 2010Introduction Scour at marine structures, Richard Whitehouse
- 6. 6 ENPC 2010Introduction• What is the scouring process?• Research on the scouring process• What is an inlet condition?
- 7. 7 ENPC 2010Introduction• Empirical formulas• Simulations: Direct Numerical Simulation, Large Eddy Simulation, etc.• Measurement: hot-film velocimetry, Laser Doppler Velocimetry, etc.
- 8. 8 ENPC 2010Introduction• What is the scouring process?• Research on the scouring process• What is an inlet condition?
- 9. 9 ENPC 2010Introduction
- 10. 10 ENPC 2010Introduction
- 11. 11 ENPC 2010Introduction: objectives• Draw up the state of the question of the influence of the inlet conditions on the scouring process• Quantify this influence in the framework of the experiments conducted at the laboratory
- 12. 12 ENPC 2010Introduction: stakes• Critique of the experiments conducted in the laboratory• Critique of the methods employed by other researchers• Focus on a parameter neglected by the researchers
- 13. 13 ENPC 2010Technische Üniversität München• Founded in 1868 by Ludwig II• 23000 students each year• Since 2006, belongs to the Elite Universities of Germany
- 14. 14 ENPC 2010Fachgebiet Hydromechanik• First chair of the TUM• Around ten researchers ▫ Numerical simulation ▫ Laboratory experiments on scour ▫ Cooperation with the city of Munich (Isar) ▫ Hydromechanic courses and study trips
- 15. 15 ENPC 2010Fachgebiet HydromechanikProf. Dr.-Ing. habil. M. Dipl.-Ing. Florian Pfleger Dr.-Ing. ChristophManhart Research Associate RappHead of Chair Head of Laboratory
- 16. 16 ENPC 2010Outline1. Influence of the inlet condition on the scouring process: starting point2. Measurement technique: the Laser Doppler Velocimetry (and a first measurement)3. Measurements, discussion, conclusion
- 17. 17 ENPC 2010Outline1. Influence of the inlet condition on the scouring process: starting point2. Measurement technique: the Laser Doppler Velocimetry (and a first measurement)3. Measurements, discussion, conclusion
- 18. 18 ENPC 2010Influence of the inlet condition on the scouring process: starting point
- 19. 19 ENPC 2010Hydromechanics elementsReynolds number:• Ratio of the inertial forces to the viscous forces• is the hydraulic radius,• the flow depth,• the channel width ;• is the flow mean velocity of the flow,• the kinematic viscosity of the fluid
- 20. is the velocity of the flow at one point 20 ENPC 2010 Hydromechanics elements Froude number: • Ratio of the inertial forces to the gravitational forces • is the velocity of the flow at one point • the flow depth; • the gravity acceleration
- 21. 21 ENPC 2010Hydromechanics elements• Froude number is equal to 0.33 subcritical flow• Reynolds number is equal to 176000 fully turbulent flow
- 22. 22 ENPC 2010The turbulent boundary layer
- 23. 23 ENPC 2010The sediment• Non-cohesive sand• Mean size 1.9mm• Natural angle of repose: 30°
- 24. 24 ENPC 2010The scouring process
- 25. 25 ENPC 2010Predictive formulas• Thirteen formulas• Seven input parameters The flow depth, The pier diameter , The mean velocity , The critical velocity , The mean size of the sediment , The non-uniformity of the sediment , The natural angle of repose• One output: the scour depth
- 26. 26 ENPC 2010Predictive formulas
- 27. 27 ENPC 2010Measurements under different inletconditions
- 28. 28 ENPC 2010Plexiglas pan on the water surface
- 29. 29 ENPC 2010Flow straighteners
- 30. 30 ENPC 2010Flow straighteners and a weir
- 31. 31 ENPC 2010Plates with holes
- 32. 32 ENPC 2010Plates and a weir
- 33. 33 ENPC 2010Observations• The inlet condition has a significant influence on the scouring process• Both dynamics and equilibrium are affected• The measurements range within the predictions• Inlet conditions can be classified
- 34. 34 ENPC 2010Observations Scour depth after two hours Flow straighteners 5cm Flow straighteners 8-9cm plus weir Grids 9-10cm Grids plus weir 11cm
- 35. 35 ENPC 2010Observations Scour dynamicsInlet condition ? ? and equilibrium
- 36. 36 ENPC 2010Outline1. Influence of the inlet condition on the scouring process: starting point2. Measurement technique: the Laser Doppler Velocimetry (and a first measurement)3. Measurements, discussion, conclusion
- 37. 37 ENPC 2010Measurement technique: the Laser Doppler Velocimetry (and a first measurement)
- 38. 38 ENPC 2010Laboratory configuration
- 39. 39 ENPC 2010Laser Doppler Velocimetry• A flow is seeded with small buoyant particles that scatter light
- 40. 40 ENPC 2010Laser Doppler Velocimetry• Two Laser beams cross at a point called the measurement volume, and create a set of fringes
- 41. 41 ENPC 2010Laser Doppler Velocimetry• Particles crossing the measurement volume emit a signal whose frequency is proportional to their velocity.
- 42. 42 ENPC 2010Laser Doppler Velocimetry• The signal is processed by a computer so as to get this velocity.
- 43. 43 ENPC 2010Laser Doppler Velocimetry• Frequency shift:• Detected frequency with and without frequency shift:
- 44. 44 ENPC 2010Processing of the data • Fast Fourier Transform • Determination of the main frequency • Determination of the corresponding velocity
- 45. 45 ENPC 2010Processing of the data • Around 2000 bursts: reliable information • Mean velocity component: expected value • Root mean square fluctuation component: variance
- 46. 46 ENPC 2010A first measurement Velocity field? •One measurement= one velocity component •2D velocities= two measurements per point
- 47. 47 ENPC 2010A first measurement • 95 points • 2 measurement directions per point • 2000 bursts per measurement
- 48. 48 ENPC 2010A first measurement
- 49. 49 ENPC 2010A first measurement • Presence of the horseshoe vortex • The approaching flow is bent by the presence of the pier • But: some oddities
- 50. 50 ENPC 2010Problems encountered• Fast Fourier samples number too small: peak-locking
- 51. 51 ENPC 2010Problems encountered• Measurement directions too close one to anotherSmall input variations result in very different outputs.
- 52. 52 ENPC 2010Outline1. Influence of the inlet condition on the scouring process: starting point2. Measurement technique: the Laser Doppler Velocimetry (and a first measurement)3. Measurements, discussion, conclusion
- 53. 53 ENPC 2010Measurements, discussion, conclusion
- 54. 54 ENPC 2010Measurement of four different velocityprofiles •Four different vertical velocity profiles •Measured under four different inlet condtions
- 55. 55ENPC 2010
- 56. 56 ENPC 2010Comment •The red profile cannot be used, because the flow was assymetric •The other profiles have identical mean velocities •And show significant differences of distribution in the upper region The inlet conditions have an influence on the vertical velocity distributions
- 57. 57 ENPC 2010Comparison of the measured profiles Wall shear stress of the different profiles: (Sagaut, 2006)
- 58. 58 ENPC 2010Comparison of the measured profiles Scour depth Wall shear after two stress hours Flow 5cm 0.32Pa straighteners Flow 8-9cm ? straighteners plus weir Grids 9-10cm 0.35Pa Grids plus weir 11cm 0.40Pa
- 59. 59 ENPC 2010Ettema’s Theory (1980) “The higher the shear parameter, the deeper the scour depth”
- 60. 60 ENPC 2010 Influence of the inlet condition Vertical velocity Wall shear Shear Scour dynamicsInlet condition Ettema’s theory distribution stress parameter and equilibrium
- 61. 61 ENPC 2010Introduction: objectives• Draw up the state of the question of the influence of the inlet conditions on the scouring process OK• Quantify this influence in the framework of the experiments conducted at the laboratory OK
- 62. 62 ENPC 2010But…
- 63. 63 ENPC 2010Why is the influence of the inletconditions hardly ever mentioned?
- 64. 64 ENPC 2010The researchers’ assumption Universal logarithmic profile Vertical velocity Wall shear Shear Scour dynamicsInlet condition Ettema’s theory distribution stress parameter and equilibrium
- 65. 65 ENPC 2010How can someone get a universalvelocity profile?• After a certain free flow length, a boundary layer is fully developed universal logarithmic velocity profile• But there is no acknowledged criterion establishing this free flow length. This length is case-specific, and is not reached in our case
- 66. 66 ENPC 2010Reference Flow Channel Channel Free flow Hydraulic Free flow depth width length length radius length/hydr aulic radiusLink 2006 20-40cm 2m 30m 15m 17-29cm 51-88Carette 25cm 1.17m 11m 6.5m 17cm 382008Yanmaz 4-16.5cm 0.67m 10.9m 6.9m 4-11cm 62-1721991Zanke 1982 42-55cm 0.6m 15m 7.5m 17.5- 38-43 20cmDey 1995 3-5cm 0.81m 10m 5m 3-5cm 100-166Oliveto 4-60cm 1m 30m 15m 4-27cm 55-3752007Melville 10-24cm 0.44m 11.8m 6m 7-12cm 50-851987This report 15cm 1.17m N/A 6.5m 12cm 54
- 67. 67 ENPC 2010Conclusion• The inlet condition affects the scour phenomenon through the value of the shear parameter, in line with Ettema’s theory• Researchers tackle this problem by assuming that the boundary layer is fully developed which is the case when the free flow length is big enough• In our case, the free flow length is not big enough. Flumes of comparable dimensions might have the same problem
- 68. 68 ENPC 2010Conclusion• A criterion should be created to determine a correct inlet condition; else, the shear parameter should be explicitly mentioned.• Experiments conducted under comparable configuration should be considered with precaution.
- 69. 69Merci de votre attention ENPC 2010

Full NameComment goes here.