Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure? Presentation Congress EAWOP Santiago de Compostela 2009

52

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
52
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. University of Cologne Department of Economic and Social Psychology Christian Bosau & Lorenz Fischer Job satisfaction cross-culturally: Is it just acquiescence what we measure?
  • 2. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 2 Background of the study Job satisfaction (JS) in research: § JS is the most widely studied topic in organizational psychology (Judge et al., 2001) § however, most studies are anglo-american è can we generalize the results?!? Are we really measuring „true“ satisfation? Job satisfaction (JS) in organizations: § keyword: international employee satisfaction survey § the absolute level of JS often has direct consequences for leaders § intercultural measurement problems often are NOT considered Main question: How can we compare the results of JS across national and cultural borders?
  • 3. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 3 Cross-cultural JS-results 8,4 8,4 8,2 8,1 8,0 7,9 7,9 7,8 7,8 7,7 7,7 7,7 7,7 7,7 7,6 7,6 7,6 7,6 7,6 7,6 7,5 7,5 7,5 7,5 7,3 7,3 7,2 7,1 7,1 7,1 7,1 7,1 7,0 7,0 7,0 6,9 6,9 6,9 6,7 6,7 6,6 6,6 6,6 6,5 6,2 6,1 5,9 5,5 5 6 7 8 9 Switzerland Malta Denmark Norway Canada Iceland Ireland Austria USA Sweden Belgium NorthIreland Mexico Japan Argentina Chile Finland Netherlands Brazil Luxembourg Poland Nigeria Portugal UnitedKingdom Italy Germany-West Slovenia CzechRepublic Hungary SouthAfrica-White Germany-East Spain India China Slovakia France Lithuania Greece Croatia Estonia Rumania Latvia Bulgaria Korea Russia Turkey Ukraine Belarus • results from World-Values-Survey: • very often: deskriptive intercultural results are published (Slocum & Topichak, 1972; Lincoln et al, 1981; Griffeth & Hom, 1987; Near & Rechner, 1993; Chiu & Kosinski, 1999; van de Vliert & Janssen, 2002; Llorente & Macias, 2005) Unclear: Can we really just interpret those descriptive differences of JS directly?
  • 4. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 4 Problems of cross-cultural research response styles and culture: § different cultures show different response styles, e.g. acquiescence (ARS) (Hui & Triandis, 1989; Johnson et al., 1997; Chen et al.; 1995; Takahashi et al., 2002; Harzing, 2006) § different response style should be understood as different communicational behaviour, not just methodological bias (Smith, 2004; Smith & Fischer R., 2006) standardising of measures (see Fischer, R.; 2004): with-in-subject, group centering, grand mean centering problems: § measures are not independent from each other anymore § absolute level of measures is lost § interpretation is possible only in relation to standardising value (group or grand mean, etc.) What can we do about it? Note: Especially problematic if we want to compare absolute measurements, like JS-levels of countries/subsidiaries/etc.!
  • 5. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 5 Method - secondary analysis § Data from World-Values-Survey & Eurobarometer § operationalisation of acquiescence response style (see Harzing, 2006) : acquiescence-index 5-point-scale: ALL items, having received 5 or 4 MINUS ALL items, having received 2 or 1 § aggregation to national level § correlation of national means (controlled for soziodemographic differences of nations, i.e. age, gender) Important question: How will the JS-measurement be influenced by response styles?
  • 6. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 6 Nation-level-results - 1 results: § job satisfaction and ARS are indeed correlated: BUT negatively. § i.e., high measures of job satisfaction only occur in countries/cultures with small or no ARS response tendency norms Keeping in mind: in all countries respondents are on average satisfied with their jobs § Note: if ARS exist, respondents do not report dissatisfaction but only lower satisfaction § Fits with the self-construal results of Markus & Kitayama (1991): interdependent/collectivist people – having higher ARS – are restrained in telling their personal feelings. -.13 (14) -.68** (11) -.59*** (16) -.71*** (16) -.68*** (16) Job Satisfaction (nation-level-mean from Eurobarometer)1 -.29 (25)ARS-index from Hofstede (2001) -.47** (23)ARS-index from Harzing (2006) -.38*** (47) ARS-index 3 aus WVS (4-point-scale ‚agree/disagree‘-label) -.47*** (42) ARS-index 2 from WVS (5-point-scale ‚important/unimportant‘-label) -.47*** (46) ARS-index 1 from WVS (5-point-scale ‚agree/disagree‘-label) Job Satisfaction (nation-level-mean from World-Values-Survey)1 1 pearson-correlation coefficient; significance: *** p < .01, ** p < .05, * p < .10; in parentheses: number of countries
  • 7. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 7 Nation-level-results - 2 -.13 (14) -.68** (11) -.59*** (16) -.71*** (16) -.68*** (16) Job Satisfaction (nation-level-mean from Eurobarometer)1 -.29 (25)ARS-index from Hofstede (2001) -.47** (23)ARS-index from Harzing (2006) -.38*** (47) ARS-index 3 aus WVS (4-point-scale ‚agree/disagree‘-label) -.47*** (42) ARS-index 2 from WVS (5-point-scale ‚important/unimportant‘-label) -.47*** (46) ARS-index 1 from WVS (5-point-scale ‚agree/disagree‘-label) Job Satisfaction (nation-level-mean from World-Values-Survey)1 1 pearson-correlation coefficient; significance: *** p < .01, ** p < .05, * p < .10; in parentheses number of countries § the correlation is higher in european nations (countries of the EU)! § Note: european nations have – on average – better working conditions, since economic wealth is higher (compared wordwidely) § we know: job satisfaction measurements are certainly influenced by working conditions as well – not only communicational norms
  • 8. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 8 Re-test of WVS-data § Operationalisation working conditions : GDP (gross domestic product) § Median split into good (rich countries) and bad (poor countries) working conditions Rich countries Poor countries Job satisfaction (nation-level-mean from World-Values-Survey) Job satisfaction (nation-level-means from Word-Values-Survey) ARS-index 1 from WVS (5-point-scale ‚agree/disagree‘-label) -.51* (22) -.02 (24) ARS-index 2 from WVS (5-point-scale ‚important/unimportant‘-label) -.51*** (22) -.34 (20) ARS-index 3 aus WVS (4-point-scale ‚agree/disagree‘-label) -.37* (23) -.04 (24) ARS-index from Harzing (2006) -.61** (13) .08 (10) ARS-index from Hofstede (2001) -.34 (19) sample to small § result: correlation remains important and significant only in rich countries with good working conditions, almost no correlation within poor countries with bad working conditions § possible interpretation: following communicational norms becomes important only if a sufficient working standard is established 1 pearson-correlation coefficient; significance: *** p < .01, ** p < .05, * p < .10; in parentheses (number of countries)
  • 9. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 9 New findings and current research relationship of culture and response behaviour: § Acquiescence is high in cultures characterized by high collectivism (Harzing, 2006; Smith 2004) new results: negativ relationship of acquiescence and job satisfaction (in rich countries) We already know: relationship of culture and job satisfaction: § JS-Level is higher in individualistic countries (see Hofstede, Judge, etc.) hypothesis: relationship of IND and JS might be only a spurious correlation relationship instead: culture à response tendency à JS-measureIND JS ARS + - -
  • 10. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 10 § statistical analysis: mediation analysis (Baron & Kenney, 1986) Test of mediation model analysis by rich countries of WVS (N=21) § interpretation: relationship of culture and JS can be (almost completely) mediated by ARS; thus: culture à response tendency à JS-level total effect Individualism (Hofstede) job satisfaction β = .39* (p=.08) mediation model job satisfaction β = .20 (p=.39) β = -.49** (p=.03) β = -.39 (p=.11) Individualism (Hofstede) ARS § same analysis with poor countries showed no total and no mediation effect § using several indicators for Individualism, ARS and job satisfaction in 8 different mediation models we always get the same pattern of results
  • 11. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 11 § statistical analysis: stepwise multilevel analysis with HLM 6 (Bryk & Raudenbush) Multi-Level analysis analysis by rich countries of WVS (N=21) ARS individualindividual level national level ARS norm JS .072-1.43*Step 2: ARS norm 5.31** (1) Step 3: ARS individual .07 .078 4.31** (1) Step 4: ARS individual – random slope 70.60** (1) § result: negative relationship with national ARS norm remains significant; on individual level no clear relationship of ARS and JS § same analysis with poor countries showed no effects at all Step 1: Basic Model, controlled for age & gender unstand. beta SE increase in model fit Chi-Square (df) Step 5: ARS norm x ARS individual -.04 .889 0.002 (1)
  • 12. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 12 Conclusion Results: § indeed: JS-measurements are influenced by response styles (ARS) § consequence: measurements from different cultures cannot be compared directly § national level: negative relationship, i.e. the higher the norm to agree, the more moderate the JS-measurement § individual level: no clear relationship, i.e. in some countries negative and in some countries positive § individualism-JS-relationship can be understood as a spurious correlation § instead: cultural values and their socialization leeds to a specific communication style that in turn influences the JS-measurements In conclusion: Cross-culturally, we are not measuring „true“ satisfaction. To a great extent we are getting results that are an expression of culturally socialized communication norms!
  • 13. Bosau & Fischer – job satisfaction cross-culturally 13. – 16.05.2009 – EAWOP 2009 – Santiago de Compostela Seite 13 contact details: Christian Bosau Dipl.-Psych. & Master of HRM & IR Department of Economic and Social Psychology University of Cologne Herbert-Lewin-Str.2 50931 Cologne/Germany Tel. +49 (0)221 470-4120 christian.bosau@uni-koeln.de Thanks for your attention

×