Security Administration Viii 3 Testifying In Court
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Security Administration Viii 3 Testifying In Court

on

  • 1,136 views

Testifying In Court

Testifying In Court

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,136
Views on SlideShare
1,136
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Security Administration Viii 3 Testifying In Court Security Administration Viii 3 Testifying In Court Presentation Transcript

    • Testifying in Court
    • Overview • Grand Jury vs. Trial Jury • Expert vs. Regular Witnesses • Preparing for Court • Speaking/Acting with Confidence • Giving Your Testimony • Review
    • Grand Jury vs. Trial Jury • Both examine the relevant evidence of a case • Grand juries decide whether to indict (bring formal charges against) a suspect. • Trial juries determine whether the defendant should be acquitted of the charges against him/her. • Grand jury is more closed and relaxed • Prosecution and defense attorneys go to trial
    • Sequence of a Criminal Trial • Jury selection. • Opening statements by prosecution and defense. • Prosecution’s case presentation. • Defense’s case presentation. • Closing statements by prosecution and defense. • Instructions to jury. • Jury deliberation to reach verdict. • Reading of verdict. • Acquittal or passing of sentence.
    • Expert vs. Regular Witnesses • Expertise • Provide Opinion • Qualified
    • • They go on thinking that their legal instinct and their common sense supplies them with all that is needed and somewhat more . . .
    • lawyers judges juries
    • • Yes – if the average Juror (or Judge) does not have the necessary experience and knowledge
    • • Training • Work Experience • Formal Education • Experience as an Expert • Passing a Standardized Test • Recognition by Academic Institution • Recognition by a Professional Organization
    • Justice Blackmun explained that “absent an acceptable showing of such a nexus, evidence on the phases of the moon indicating that it was full on a certain night could not be received to show that a particular individual was behaving irrationally on that evening.”
    • • How can we expect jurors to decide between experts when the jurors’ ignorance is the premise for allowing the expert to testify in the first place? •Learned Hand, 1901
    • Preparing for Court • Begins at the scene • Take good notes • Review your report • Be confident • Be prepared to explain inconsistencies
    • Case Presentation • Direct examination: the initial questions of a witness or defendant by the lawyer who is using the person’s testimony to further his or her case. • Cross-examination: Questioning by the opposing side for the purpose of assessing the validity of the testimony.
    • Speaking/Acting with Confidence • Get/stay familiar with the court • Know the major players • Don’t discuss the case in public • Treat people with respect, be professional & polite • Don’t get personal • Be on time • Dress right
    • Giving Your Testimony • To effectively testify in court: – Be prepared. – Look professional. – Act professionally. • Attempts will be made to discredit or impeach the testimony of the security officer in court.
    • Inadmissible Statements • Opinion (unless qualified as an expert). • Hearsay. • Privileged communication. • Statements about character and reputation, including the defendant’s past criminal record.
    • Effective Testimony • Speak clearly, firmly and with expression. • Answer questions directly. Do not volunteer information. • Pause briefly before answering. • Refer to your notes if you do not recall exact details. • Admit calmly when you do not know an answer. • Admit any mistakes you make is testifying. • Avoid jargon, sarcasm and humor. • Tell the complete truth as you know it.
    • Using Notes • Refer to your notes if you are uncertain of specific facts, but do not rely on them excessively.
    • Nonverbal Elements in Testimony • Important nonverbal elements include: – Dress. – Eye contact. – Posture. – Gestures. – Distance. – Mannerisms. – Rate of speech. – Tone of voice.
    • Strategies for Testifying • Set yourself up. • Provoke the defense into giving you a chance to explain. • Be unconditional. • Do not stall.
    • Cross-Examination by the Defense • The defense attorney may: – Be disarmingly friendly or intimidatingly rude. – Attack your credibility and impartiality. – Attack your investigative skill. – Attempt to force contradictions or inconsistencies. – Ask leading questions or deliberately misquote you. – Ask for a simple answer to a complex question. – Use rapid-fire questioning. – Use the silent treatment.
    • Cross-Examination by the Defense • Avoid conclusions and nonresponsive answers. • Answer yes-or-no questions with “yes” or “no.”
    • Review • What is important in testifying in court? • What is the usual sequence of a criminal trial? • What is direct examination? Cross- examination? • What kinds of statements are inadmissible in court? • How can one testify most effectively?
    • Review • When should you use notes when testifying? • What nonverbal elements can influence courtroom testimony positively and negatively? • What strategies can make testifying in court more effective? • What defense attorney tactics should an officer anticipate?
    • That’s all . . .