Email
Like
Liked ×
Save
Private Content
Embed
Loading embed code…
We have emailed the verification/download link to "".
Login to your email and click the link to download the file directly.

To request the link at a different email address, update it here. Close
Validation messages. Success message. Fail message.

Check your bulk/spam folders if you can't find our mail.
Loading

+ Follow

Feed In Tariff: California CPUC v. FERC

by Carolyn Elefant on Oct 07, 2010

1,608 views

A discussion of the issues related to California PUC's feed-in tariff case at FERC. FERC held that the Federal Power Act preempts a state from setting a feed-in tariff, but states may rely on PURPA ...

A discussion of the issues related to California PUC's feed-in tariff case at FERC. FERC held that the Federal Power Act preempts a state from setting a feed-in tariff, but states may rely on PURPA as a basis for a feed-in

Accessibility

View text version

Upload Details

Uploaded via SlideShare as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

File a copyright complaint

1 Embed 39

http://lawofficesofcarolynelefant.com

39

Statistics

Likes: 0
Downloads: 16
Comments: 0
Embed Views: 39
Views on SlideShare: 1,569
Total Views: 1,608

To be eligible for feed in CHP facilities must achieve 60% energy conversion efficiency which exceeds minimum 42-45% requirements in FERC’s QF cogen regs. Important to have incentives. Also, if CHP is in CAISO designated constrained area, feed-in allows 10% adjustment to account for tmission upgrades. Finally, since capacity must be new, may be different avoided costs - bottom line: may need multiple avoided code calculations! ALSO state laws make utility purchase costs more expensive