A Faculty Online Readiness Tool

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    A Faculty Online Readiness Tool - Presentation Transcript

    1. Carol McQuiggan, Penn State University-Harrisburg Linda Futch, University of Central Florida Larry Ragan, Penn State University The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning
    2.   Rationale   Initial categories   Partnering   Development process   Current status   Discussion The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 2
    3.   Identify core competencies for online instructors   Promote eLearning through a faculty self- assessment tool ◦  Determine their readiness for online teaching ◦  Link them to appropriate resources to fill in the identified gaps The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 3
    4.   Gleaned from various web and print resources: ◦  Initial preparation ◦  Use of Internet in teaching ◦  Communicating online ◦  Time management ◦  Organization ◦  Technical computer skills The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 4
    5.   University of Central Florida contacted January 2007   First virtual meeting in March 2007   Collaboration tools: ◦  Writely -> Google Docs + Phone ◦  Adobe Connect Pro ◦  Email The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 5
    6.   Grouped core competencies into 4 major categories From To Organization Organization & Time Time management Management Communicating online Communicating Online Initial preparation Teaching & Online Use of Internet in teaching Experience Technical computer skills Technical Skills The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 6
    7.   Reviewed current criteria points in each category   Narrowed number of criteria points to as few as possible   Identified criteria that might be better addressed in another category and moved it   Discussed categories and refined criteria points The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 7
    8.   Located resources to fill in the knowledge gaps the survey could uncover   Located research to support the online skills identified   Scripted general and individual feedback The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 8
    9.   Possible delivery mechanisms evaluated: ◦  Questionmark ◦  Online form ◦  Java score-generator ◦  Rubric tool developed by Dr. Kyle Peck   Selection criteria: ◦  Customizability – can add own resources to feedback ◦  Data collection options at local level ◦  Provide individualized feedback The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 9
    10. The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 10
    11. The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 11
    12. The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 12
    13.   Rubric feedback from team ◦  Amount of time to take survey ◦  Clearness of questions ◦  Clearness of choices ◦  Clear/helpful feedback ◦  Grammar, spelling, punctuation, accessible language ◦  Recommended changes The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 13
    14.   Rubric field tested ◦  Experienced online educators ◦  Educators with no online teaching experience The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 14
    15.   Changes recommended from field test ◦  Make survey operational in multiple browsers ◦  Change colors for printing and accessibility ◦  Add directions to begin survey ◦  Indicate expected amount of time survey will take ◦  Make question grouping obvious ◦  Additional choices needed for some items ◦  Incomplete survey cannot be submitted, but message received refers to question numbers and questions are not numbered The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 15
    16.   More changes recommended from field test ◦  Need to know to scroll down for feedback or add feedback to top ◦  Need some way to indicate those places where faculty skills are deficient ◦  Designate difference between generic feedback and specific feedback, possibly putting specific feedback first ◦  Printing instructions needed The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 16
    17.   Programmer to make recommended changes   Pilot test with faculty groups   Analyze feedback and make final changes   Complete Creative Commons license   Add to Sloan-C website The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 17
    18.   Distribution of handouts   In small groups of 4 or 5, review a category   One person from each small group record points of discussion on paper   Reconvene with sharing of major points The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 18
    19.   Do you think an online tool like this will be helpful in your work?   Do you find the categories/questions appropriate? ◦  What should be eliminated/changed? ◦  What is missing that should be added?   Other comments? The 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning 19
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Carol McQuigganCarol McQuiggan Nominate

    custom

    94 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation from the 13th Annual Sloan-C Internati more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 94
      • 94 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 5
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories