Bloomington’sDevelopment ReviewProcess
Speed of Process   Process has always been fast   In 1990s, Plan Commission meetings    3 weeks apart. In spring, someti...
Predictability of Process   1980s/early 1990s – process    extremely unpredictable    – Environmental Commission    – Out...
Steps to become morepredictable   1991 comprehensive plan   1993 Environmental Review Coordinator   1995 zoning ordinan...
1998 Changes   Development Review Committee   Development Review Schedule    – 40 days for zoned property    – Plan Comm...
2002 ComprehensivePlan/2007 UDO   Architectural standards for downtown development    (no design review committee)   Pla...
How Bloomington’s processbecame more predictable   Objectively evaluated development review    process – DRC   Limited i...
Form-Based ZoningCode   Bloomington doesn’t have one; downtown    development code is essentially form-based   Many core...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Innovation in Government: Bloomington’s Development Review Process

451

Published on

Tom Micuda, Planning Director for the City of Bloomington, gave a presentation on the city's development review process for the 2012 Inter-City Visit to Bloomington, IN.

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
451
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Innovation in Government: Bloomington’s Development Review Process

  1. 1. Bloomington’sDevelopment ReviewProcess
  2. 2. Speed of Process Process has always been fast In 1990s, Plan Commission meetings 3 weeks apart. In spring, sometimes 2 weeks apart. 1990s – Typical processing time for zoned development – 30-40 days; rezoning – 90-120 days
  3. 3. Predictability of Process 1980s/early 1990s – process extremely unpredictable – Environmental Commission – Outdated ordinance/comprehensive plan – Staff overwhelmed; didn’t coordinate with other departments – Result: Large number of rezoning cases for suburban residential development; industrial/commercial upzones
  4. 4. Steps to become morepredictable 1991 comprehensive plan 1993 Environmental Review Coordinator 1995 zoning ordinance – Plat Committee for subdivisions – Hearing Officer for simple variances – Overlay zoning for density instead of PUDs – Staff delegation for PUD final plans 1998 – Overhauled Development Review Process – hired consultant
  5. 5. 1998 Changes Development Review Committee Development Review Schedule – 40 days for zoned property – Plan Commission meetings 4-5 weeks apart – Rezoning cases – 120 days
  6. 6. 2002 ComprehensivePlan/2007 UDO Architectural standards for downtown development (no design review committee) Plan Commission review limited to: – Downtown – Large residential; nonresidential site plans – Projects near SR3 – Use Variance recommendations; rezonings Council – Right-of-way vacations; rezoning; PUDs Most code deviations handled by Plan Commission/BZA
  7. 7. How Bloomington’s processbecame more predictable Objectively evaluated development review process – DRC Limited interest group involvement (environmental, bike/ped, historic) Updated codes/comprehensive plan Extremely experienced development review staff Just say ‘No’ to bad discretionary development proposals
  8. 8. Form-Based ZoningCode Bloomington doesn’t have one; downtown development code is essentially form-based Many core neighborhoods have been placed into Conservation Districts with form-based guidelines for construction Will be discussing form-based code with comprehensive plan update Will likely be Bloomington’s next zoning code Doesn’t solve development review process challenges
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×