Price Decline By States

230 views
211 views

Published on

foreclosure, depressed prices, real estate, georgia

Published in: Sports, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
230
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Price Decline By States

  1. 1. California: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 280 260 240 Excluding REOs 220 Including REOs 200 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Florida: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 280 260 240 Excluding REOs 220 Including REOs 200 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  2. 2. Ohio: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 130 125 120 Excluding REOs 115 110 Including REOs 105 100 95 90 85 80 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics New York: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 220 200 Excluding REOs 180 Including REOs 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  3. 3. Michigan: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 140 130 120 Excluding REOs 110 Including REOs 100 90 80 70 60 50 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Illinois: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 170 160 150 Excluding REOs Including REOs 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  4. 4. North Carolina: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 140 135 130 Excluding REOs 125 Including REOs 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics New Jersey: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 240 220 200 Excluding REOs Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  5. 5. Massachusetts: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 200 190 180 Excluding REOs 170 160 Including REOs 150 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Pennsylvania: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 200 190 180 Excluding REOs 170 160 Including REOs 150 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Georgia: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 135 130 Excluding REOs 125 Including REOs 120 115 110 105 100 95 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  6. 6. Virginia: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 270 250 Excluding REOs 230 Including REOs 210 190 170 150 130 110 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Tennessee: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 150 140 Excluding REOs Including REOs 130 120 110 100 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Wisconsin: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 170 160 Excluding REOs 150 Including REOs 140 130 120 110 100 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  7. 7. Washington: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 210 190 Excluding REOs Including REOs 170 150 130 110 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Minnesota: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 180 170 Excluding REOs 160 Including REOs 150 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Alabam a: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 160 150 Excluding REOs Including REOs 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  8. 8. Arizona: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 240 220 Excluding REOs 200 Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Kentucky: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 140 135 Excluding REOs 130 Including REOs 125 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  9. 9. Colorado: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 145 140 Excluding REOs 135 Including REOs 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Maryland: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 240 220 Excluding REOs 200 Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Source: LPS Applied Analytics 2009 Oklahom a: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 150 145 Excluding REOs 140 135 Including REOs 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  10. 10. South Carolina: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 160 150 Excluding REOs Including REOs 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Iow a: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 135 130 Excluding REOs 125 Including REOs 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Oregon: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 200 190 Excluding REOs 180 170 Including REOs 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  11. 11. Connecticut: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 220 200 Excluding REOs Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Arkansas: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 150 145 Excluding REOs 140 135 Including REOs 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  12. 12. Nebraska: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 135 130 Excluding REOs 125 Including REOs 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Nevada: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 240 220 Excluding REOs 200 Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 80 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics New Ham pshire: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 220 200 Excluding REOs Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  13. 13. Rhode Island: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 260 240 Excluding REOs 220 Including REOs 200 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Haw aii: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 300 280 Excluding REOs 260 240 Including REOs 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
  14. 14. Delaw are: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 200 190 Excluding REOs 180 170 Including REOs 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Source: LPS Applied Analytics District of Colum bia: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 350 Excluding REOs 300 Including REOs 250 200 150 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Note: In some states, the data represents market activity in major metropolitan areas only.

×