Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Charts for LPS Press Release: LPS Releases Study That Demonstrates Impact of Foreclosure Sales
on Home Prices – August 200...
Arizona

250,000                                                                   60.0%
                                 ...
District of Columbia

8,000                                                                    20.0%
7,000                ...
Colorado

140,000                                                                       35.0%
                            ...
Georgia

160,000                                                                   25.0%
140,000                          ...
Hawaii

30,000                                                                     10.0%
                                 ...
Illinois

200,000                                                                       35.0%
                            ...
Massachusetts

100,000                                                                   16.0%
                           ...
Michigan

160,000                                                                       70.0%
140,000                     ...
North Carolina

160,000                                                                       16.0%
140,000               ...
New Hampshire

9,000                                                                          16.0%
8,000                 ...
Nevada

120,000                                                                     70.0%
                                ...
Ohio

200,000                                                                       40.0%
                                ...
Oregon

80,000                                                                        25.0%
70,000                        ...
Rhode Island

16,000                                                                    35.0%
14,000                      ...
Tennessee

120,000                                                                   30.0%
                               ...
Vermont

4,000                                                                            8.0%
3,500                      ...
Wisconsin

30,000                                                                   20.0%
                                ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Impact Of Foreclosures On Home Prices

272

Published on

foreclosures, national stats, georgia, real estate

Published in: Business, Economy & Finance
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
272
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Impact Of Foreclosures On Home Prices"

  1. 1. Charts for LPS Press Release: LPS Releases Study That Demonstrates Impact of Foreclosure Sales on Home Prices – August 2009 Alabama 30,000 18.0% Residential S ales 16.0% 25,000 S hare o f REO S ales 14.0% 20,000 12.0% 10.0% 15,000 8.0% 10,000 6.0% 4.0% 5,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Arkansas 14,000 25.0% Residential S ales 12,000 20.0% S hare o f REO S ales 10,000 8,000 15.0% 6,000 10.0% 4,000 5.0% 2,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  2. 2. Arizona 250,000 60.0% Residential S ales 50.0% 200,000 S hare o f REO S ales 40.0% 150,000 30.0% 100,000 20.0% 50,000 10.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics California 800,000 60.0% 700,000 Residential S ales 50.0% 600,000 S hare o f REO S ales 40.0% 500,000 400,000 30.0% 300,000 20.0% 200,000 10.0% 100,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  3. 3. District of Columbia 8,000 20.0% 7,000 Residential S ales 6,000 S hare o f REO S ales 15.0% 5,000 4,000 10.0% 3,000 2,000 5.0% 1,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Connecticut 60,000 16.0% Residential S ales 14.0% 50,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 40,000 10.0% 30,000 8.0% 6.0% 20,000 4.0% 10,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  4. 4. Colorado 140,000 35.0% Residential S ales 120,000 30.0% S hare o f REO S ales 100,000 25.0% 80,000 20.0% 60,000 15.0% 40,000 10.0% 20,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Delaware 14,000 12.0% Residential S ales 12,000 10.0% S hare o f REO S ales 10,000 8.0% 8,000 6.0% 6,000 4.0% 4,000 2,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  5. 5. Georgia 160,000 25.0% 140,000 Residential S ales 20.0% 120,000 S hare o f REO S ales 100,000 15.0% 80,000 60,000 10.0% 40,000 5.0% 20,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Florida 700,000 40.0% Residential S ales 35.0% 600,000 S hare o f REO S ales 30.0% 500,000 25.0% 400,000 20.0% 300,000 15.0% 200,000 10.0% 100,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  6. 6. Hawaii 30,000 10.0% Residential S ales 25,000 8.0% S hare o f REO S ales 20,000 6.0% 15,000 4.0% 10,000 2.0% 5,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Iowa 16,000 9.0% 14,000 Residential S ales 8.0% 12,000 S hare o f REO S ales 7.0% 6.0% 10,000 5.0% 8,000 4.0% 6,000 3.0% 4,000 2.0% 2,000 1.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  7. 7. Illinois 200,000 35.0% Residential S ales 30.0% 150,000 S hare o f REO S ales 25.0% 20.0% 100,000 15.0% 10.0% 50,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Kentucky 20,000 35.0% Residential S ales 30.0% 15,000 S hare o f REO S ales 25.0% 20.0% 10,000 15.0% 10.0% 5,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  8. 8. Massachusetts 100,000 16.0% Residential S ales 14.0% 80,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 60,000 10.0% 8.0% 40,000 6.0% 4.0% 20,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Maryland 180,000 16.0% 160,000 Residential S ales 14.0% 140,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 120,000 10.0% 100,000 8.0% 80,000 6.0% 60,000 40,000 4.0% 20,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  9. 9. Michigan 160,000 70.0% 140,000 Residential S ales 60.0% 120,000 S hare o f REO S ales 50.0% 100,000 40.0% 80,000 30.0% 60,000 20.0% 40,000 20,000 10.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Minnesota 80,000 50.0% 70,000 Residential S ales 40.0% 60,000 S hare o f REO S ales 50,000 30.0% 40,000 30,000 20.0% 20,000 10.0% 10,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  10. 10. North Carolina 160,000 16.0% 140,000 Residential S ales 14.0% 120,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 100,000 10.0% 80,000 8.0% 60,000 6.0% 40,000 4.0% 20,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Nebraska 10,000 9.0% Residential S ales 8.0% 8,000 7.0% S hare o f REO S ales 6.0% 6,000 5.0% 4.0% 4,000 3.0% 2,000 2.0% 1.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  11. 11. New Hampshire 9,000 16.0% 8,000 Residential S ales 14.0% 7,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 6,000 10.0% 5,000 8.0% 4,000 6.0% 3,000 2,000 4.0% 1,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics New Jersey 180,000 12.0% 160,000 Residential S ales 10.0% 140,000 S hare o f REO S ales 120,000 8.0% 100,000 6.0% 80,000 60,000 4.0% 40,000 2.0% 20,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  12. 12. Nevada 120,000 70.0% Residential S ales 100,000 60.0% S hare o f REO S ales 50.0% 80,000 40.0% 60,000 30.0% 40,000 20.0% 20,000 10.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics New York 160,000 8.0% 140,000 Residential S ales 7.0% 120,000 S hare o f REO S ales 6.0% 100,000 5.0% 80,000 4.0% 60,000 3.0% 40,000 2.0% 20,000 1.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  13. 13. Ohio 200,000 40.0% Residential S ales 35.0% 150,000 S hare o f REO S ales 30.0% 25.0% 100,000 20.0% 15.0% 50,000 10.0% 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Oklahoma 25,000 16.0% Residential S ales 14.0% 20,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 15,000 10.0% 8.0% 10,000 6.0% 4.0% 5,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  14. 14. Oregon 80,000 25.0% 70,000 Residential S ales 20.0% 60,000 S hare o f REO S ales 50,000 15.0% 40,000 30,000 10.0% 20,000 5.0% 10,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Pennsylvania 140,000 12.0% Residential S ales 120,000 10.0% S hare o f REO S ales 100,000 8.0% 80,000 6.0% 60,000 4.0% 40,000 20,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  15. 15. Rhode Island 16,000 35.0% 14,000 Residential S ales 30.0% 12,000 S hare o f REO S ales 25.0% 10,000 20.0% 8,000 15.0% 6,000 10.0% 4,000 2,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics South Carolina 90,000 25.0% 80,000 Residential S ales 70,000 20.0% S hare o f REO S ales 60,000 15.0% 50,000 40,000 10.0% 30,000 20,000 5.0% 10,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  16. 16. Tennessee 120,000 30.0% Residential S ales 100,000 25.0% S hare o f REO S ales 80,000 20.0% 60,000 15.0% 40,000 10.0% 20,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Virginia 140,000 30.0% Residential S ales 120,000 25.0% S hare o f REO S ales 100,000 20.0% 80,000 15.0% 60,000 10.0% 40,000 20,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  17. 17. Vermont 4,000 8.0% 3,500 Residential S ales 7.0% 3,000 S hare o f REO S ales 6.0% 2,500 5.0% 2,000 4.0% 1,500 3.0% 1,000 2.0% 500 1.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Washington 140,000 18.0% Residential S ales 16.0% 120,000 S hare o f REO S ales 14.0% 100,000 12.0% 80,000 10.0% 60,000 8.0% 6.0% 40,000 4.0% 20,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
  18. 18. Wisconsin 30,000 20.0% Residential S ales 25,000 S hare o f REO S ales 15.0% 20,000 15,000 10.0% 10,000 5.0% 5,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics

×