Impact Of Foreclosures On Home Prices
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Impact Of Foreclosures On Home Prices

on

  • 593 views

foreclosures, national stats, georgia, real estate

foreclosures, national stats, georgia, real estate

Statistics

Views

Total Views
593
Views on SlideShare
593
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Impact Of Foreclosures On Home Prices Impact Of Foreclosures On Home Prices Document Transcript

    • Charts for LPS Press Release: LPS Releases Study That Demonstrates Impact of Foreclosure Sales on Home Prices – August 2009 Alabama 30,000 18.0% Residential S ales 16.0% 25,000 S hare o f REO S ales 14.0% 20,000 12.0% 10.0% 15,000 8.0% 10,000 6.0% 4.0% 5,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Arkansas 14,000 25.0% Residential S ales 12,000 20.0% S hare o f REO S ales 10,000 8,000 15.0% 6,000 10.0% 4,000 5.0% 2,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Arizona 250,000 60.0% Residential S ales 50.0% 200,000 S hare o f REO S ales 40.0% 150,000 30.0% 100,000 20.0% 50,000 10.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics California 800,000 60.0% 700,000 Residential S ales 50.0% 600,000 S hare o f REO S ales 40.0% 500,000 400,000 30.0% 300,000 20.0% 200,000 10.0% 100,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • District of Columbia 8,000 20.0% 7,000 Residential S ales 6,000 S hare o f REO S ales 15.0% 5,000 4,000 10.0% 3,000 2,000 5.0% 1,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Connecticut 60,000 16.0% Residential S ales 14.0% 50,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 40,000 10.0% 30,000 8.0% 6.0% 20,000 4.0% 10,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Colorado 140,000 35.0% Residential S ales 120,000 30.0% S hare o f REO S ales 100,000 25.0% 80,000 20.0% 60,000 15.0% 40,000 10.0% 20,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Delaware 14,000 12.0% Residential S ales 12,000 10.0% S hare o f REO S ales 10,000 8.0% 8,000 6.0% 6,000 4.0% 4,000 2,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Georgia 160,000 25.0% 140,000 Residential S ales 20.0% 120,000 S hare o f REO S ales 100,000 15.0% 80,000 60,000 10.0% 40,000 5.0% 20,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Florida 700,000 40.0% Residential S ales 35.0% 600,000 S hare o f REO S ales 30.0% 500,000 25.0% 400,000 20.0% 300,000 15.0% 200,000 10.0% 100,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Hawaii 30,000 10.0% Residential S ales 25,000 8.0% S hare o f REO S ales 20,000 6.0% 15,000 4.0% 10,000 2.0% 5,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Iowa 16,000 9.0% 14,000 Residential S ales 8.0% 12,000 S hare o f REO S ales 7.0% 6.0% 10,000 5.0% 8,000 4.0% 6,000 3.0% 4,000 2.0% 2,000 1.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Illinois 200,000 35.0% Residential S ales 30.0% 150,000 S hare o f REO S ales 25.0% 20.0% 100,000 15.0% 10.0% 50,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Kentucky 20,000 35.0% Residential S ales 30.0% 15,000 S hare o f REO S ales 25.0% 20.0% 10,000 15.0% 10.0% 5,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Massachusetts 100,000 16.0% Residential S ales 14.0% 80,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 60,000 10.0% 8.0% 40,000 6.0% 4.0% 20,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Maryland 180,000 16.0% 160,000 Residential S ales 14.0% 140,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 120,000 10.0% 100,000 8.0% 80,000 6.0% 60,000 40,000 4.0% 20,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Michigan 160,000 70.0% 140,000 Residential S ales 60.0% 120,000 S hare o f REO S ales 50.0% 100,000 40.0% 80,000 30.0% 60,000 20.0% 40,000 20,000 10.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Minnesota 80,000 50.0% 70,000 Residential S ales 40.0% 60,000 S hare o f REO S ales 50,000 30.0% 40,000 30,000 20.0% 20,000 10.0% 10,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • North Carolina 160,000 16.0% 140,000 Residential S ales 14.0% 120,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 100,000 10.0% 80,000 8.0% 60,000 6.0% 40,000 4.0% 20,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Nebraska 10,000 9.0% Residential S ales 8.0% 8,000 7.0% S hare o f REO S ales 6.0% 6,000 5.0% 4.0% 4,000 3.0% 2,000 2.0% 1.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • New Hampshire 9,000 16.0% 8,000 Residential S ales 14.0% 7,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 6,000 10.0% 5,000 8.0% 4,000 6.0% 3,000 2,000 4.0% 1,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics New Jersey 180,000 12.0% 160,000 Residential S ales 10.0% 140,000 S hare o f REO S ales 120,000 8.0% 100,000 6.0% 80,000 60,000 4.0% 40,000 2.0% 20,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Nevada 120,000 70.0% Residential S ales 100,000 60.0% S hare o f REO S ales 50.0% 80,000 40.0% 60,000 30.0% 40,000 20.0% 20,000 10.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics New York 160,000 8.0% 140,000 Residential S ales 7.0% 120,000 S hare o f REO S ales 6.0% 100,000 5.0% 80,000 4.0% 60,000 3.0% 40,000 2.0% 20,000 1.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Ohio 200,000 40.0% Residential S ales 35.0% 150,000 S hare o f REO S ales 30.0% 25.0% 100,000 20.0% 15.0% 50,000 10.0% 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Oklahoma 25,000 16.0% Residential S ales 14.0% 20,000 S hare o f REO S ales 12.0% 15,000 10.0% 8.0% 10,000 6.0% 4.0% 5,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Oregon 80,000 25.0% 70,000 Residential S ales 20.0% 60,000 S hare o f REO S ales 50,000 15.0% 40,000 30,000 10.0% 20,000 5.0% 10,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Pennsylvania 140,000 12.0% Residential S ales 120,000 10.0% S hare o f REO S ales 100,000 8.0% 80,000 6.0% 60,000 4.0% 40,000 20,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Rhode Island 16,000 35.0% 14,000 Residential S ales 30.0% 12,000 S hare o f REO S ales 25.0% 10,000 20.0% 8,000 15.0% 6,000 10.0% 4,000 2,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics South Carolina 90,000 25.0% 80,000 Residential S ales 70,000 20.0% S hare o f REO S ales 60,000 15.0% 50,000 40,000 10.0% 30,000 20,000 5.0% 10,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Tennessee 120,000 30.0% Residential S ales 100,000 25.0% S hare o f REO S ales 80,000 20.0% 60,000 15.0% 40,000 10.0% 20,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Virginia 140,000 30.0% Residential S ales 120,000 25.0% S hare o f REO S ales 100,000 20.0% 80,000 15.0% 60,000 10.0% 40,000 20,000 5.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Vermont 4,000 8.0% 3,500 Residential S ales 7.0% 3,000 S hare o f REO S ales 6.0% 2,500 5.0% 2,000 4.0% 1,500 3.0% 1,000 2.0% 500 1.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics Washington 140,000 18.0% Residential S ales 16.0% 120,000 S hare o f REO S ales 14.0% 100,000 12.0% 80,000 10.0% 60,000 8.0% 6.0% 40,000 4.0% 20,000 2.0% 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics
    • Wisconsin 30,000 20.0% Residential S ales 25,000 S hare o f REO S ales 15.0% 20,000 15,000 10.0% 10,000 5.0% 5,000 0 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan - June 2009 LP S, Applied Analytics