20100223 bpmn

BPMN - PraxiserfahrungenBernd Rücker, camunda services GmbH

Bernd Rückerbernd.ruecker@camunda.com

camunda is a small BPM consulting company Your • BPM Business • BPMN • Agile • BRM camunda Business Consulting Your Your Your Process Process Process Application Application Application camunda IT Consulting

09/2009Aktuelle Trends x2 Quelle: BPM-Netzwerk.de x1,6 07/2010

Prozessmodelle für verschiedenste Zwecke und Rollen ISO-Zertifizierung Mindestanforderungen Für Risiko-Management (MARisk) Organisationshandbuch Prozessanalyse undSchriftlich -verbesserung fixierte Ordnung Workflow Management Automatisierung Serviceorientierte Anforderungs- Architekturen (SOA) management

Eine interessante Referenzen Siehe http://www.camunda.com/unternehmen/referenzen/

Branche: TelekommunikationBPM(N) im großen Stil Tooling: Signavio / JBoss jBPM Was? Lessons Learned?• u.a. DSL-Bereitstellung • Wie trage ich BPMN in die Breite?• Portierung auf JBoss jBPM • Konventionen erforderlich• Mapping BPMN 2 => jPDL 3 • Dezentrales Engagement schwierig • Tooling notwendig • Akutes Projekt vs. Meta-Ebene Erfolge?• Bessere Abstimmung Business-IT• Bessere Abstimmung IT-IT• Weniger Probleme im Betrieb

Branche: Telekommunikation„Hurra, ein Projekt ☺“ Tool: ADONIS Was? Lessons Learned?• Generelle BPMN-Einführung • Trennung Business Analyst vs.• Modellierung Netzbetrieb Modellierer• Requirements für neue Software • Konkrete Projekte erforderlich • Commitment erforderlich Erfolge?• Verständnis für BPMN• Abgleich mit bestehender Prozessdokumentation

Branche: SchwerindustrieReisemanagement Tool: SAP Netweaver CE 7.2 Was? Lessons Learned?• Reisemanagement • BPMN ist anspruchsvoll• Vom Antrag bis zur Abrechnung • Ständiges Refactoring der Modelle• Ausführung als Workflow • „camunda-Methodik“ hat geholfen • Angemessenes Tooling erforderlich Erfolge?• Besseres Verständnis für Anforderungen• Schnellere und passgenauere Umsetzung• Trennung zwischem „menschlichem“ und „technischem“ Prozess

Branche: Online-ApothekeRequirements Engineering Tool: Signavio Process Editor Was? Lessons Learned?• Prozessmodellierung • Schwieriges Handling komplexer• Klärung von Fragen Diagramme• Detail-Anforderungen ableiten • Gefahr dass Dinge vergessen werden die keinen Prozessbezug haben Erfolge?• Durchdringung komplexer Probleme „von grob nach fein“• Sehr schnelle Klärung von Fragen• Dokumentation im Zuge der Fragenklärung• Keiner der Beteiligten hatte BPMN-Vorkenntnisse• Gutes Tooling für Diskussionen & Rückfragen• Gute Grundlage für Agiles Arbeiten

Beispielprozessmodell

How to apply BPMN in your company Roles & Skills

„Also baym Tema Süntaks binn ich ya eher Prackmahticker!“

BPMN-Gurus

BPMN-Followers

Non-BPMN-Users

Beispielhafte Zuordnung in größeren Organisationen Top- Management BPM Guru Dept. Dept. Dept. Dept.

Business vs. IT? It‘s NOT that simple! •Creates Technical Processes etc. •Manages the project •Plays the main part in process •Creates/Manages typical solution development project documents •Knows BPMN best (in IT) •Creates Process Models Project Lead •Links Process Models with •Is expert in certain aspect (e.g. GUI) other Requirements •Supports Process Engineer if needed •Knows BPMN Best (in •Creates services / components used Business) in process by plain development•Represents user•Knows the solution‘s •Defines Guidelinespurpose best •Is somehow useful :-)•Can answer any questionabout functionality Process Analyst Architect Process Engineer Developer Domain Expert Business IT

How to apply BPMN in your company Methods

camunda-Methodik für BPMN-Projekte

Beispiel: Modeling Guidelines - Alternativen

Beispiel: Layout Styles

Beispiel: Design Patterns

How to apply BPMN in your company Appropriate Tooling

Appropriate Tooling… BPMN-Magnete selber basteln: BPM-Guide.de!

Be part of the moment

Next Slides are based on BPMN 2.0 by Example BPMN 2.0 by Example http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?dtc/10-06-02 Activiti Showcase http://www.bpm-guide.de/activiti/

This is directly executable BPMN 2.0

Some Details depend on your BPM platform

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><definitions id="oryx_c6b54c98-e3e8-44aa-8745-1f092b3150b6" typeLanguage="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" expressionLanguage="http://www.w3.org/1999/XPath"targetNamespace="http://www.omg.org/bpmn20" xmlns="http://schema.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0" xmlns:bpmndi="http://bpmndi.org"> The corresponding BPMN 2.0 - XML <process isClosed="false" processType="executable" id="oryx_45eeff22-1e3f-4543-be07-084ea7cfd0b7"> <laneSet name="Process Engine" id="Process Engine"> <lane name="1st level support" id="1st level support_1"> <flowElementRef>Handle Problem [ID: ${issueID}]: ${issueTitle}_2</flowElementRef> <flowElementRef>Is issue resolved?_2</flowElementRef> <flowElementRef>issue reported_2</flowElementRef> <flowElementRef>Send an email back to the Call Center Agent_2</flowElementRef> <flowElementRef>ticket closed_2</flowElementRef> <flowElementRef>Send a confirmation email back to the Call Center Agent_2</flowElementRef> <flowElementRef>Set the issue classifciation_2</flowElementRef> </lane> <lane name="2snd level support" id="2snd level support_1"> <flowElementRef>Task Finished_2</flowElementRef> <flowElementRef>Edit Ticket from Level 1 [ID: ${issueID}]: ${issueTitle}_2</flowElementRef> <flowElementRef>Is issue now resolved?_2</flowElementRef> <flowElementRef>Insert issue into product backlog_2</flowElementRef> </lane> </laneSet> <userTask implementation="webService" completionQuantity="1" startQuantity="1" isForCompensation="false" name="Handle Problem [ID: ${issueID}]: ${issueTitle}"id="Handle Problem [ID: ${issueID}]: ${issueTitle}_2"/> <exclusiveGateway gatewayDirection="Diverging" name="Is issue resolved?" id="Is issue resolved?_2"/> <startEvent isInterrupting="true" name="issue reported" id="issue reported_2"> <messageEventDefinition/> </startEvent> <sendTask implementation="webService" completionQuantity="1" startQuantity="1" isForCompensation="false" name="Send an email back to the Call Center Agent" id="Send anemail back to the Call Center Agent_2"/> <endEvent name="ticket closed" id="ticket closed_2"/> <sendTask implementation="webService" completionQuantity="1" startQuantity="1" isForCompensation="false" name="Send a confirmation email back to the Call Center Agent"id="Send a confirmation email back to the Call Center Agent_2"/> <scriptTask scriptLanguage="" completionQuantity="1" startQuantity="1" isForCompensation="false" name="Set the issue classifciation" id="Set the issue classifciation_2"> <script></script> </scriptTask> <message isInitiating="true" name="Task Finished" id="Task Finished_2"/> <userTask implementation="webService" completionQuantity="1" startQuantity="1" isForCompensation="false" name="Edit Ticket from Level 1 [ID: ${issueID}]: ${issueTitle}"id="Edit Ticket from Level 1 [ID: ${issueID}]: ${issueTitle}_2"/> <exclusiveGateway gatewayDirection="Diverging" name="Is issue now resolved?" id="Is issue now resolved?_2"/> <sendTask implementation="webService" completionQuantity="1" startQuantity="1" isForCompensation="false" name="Insert issue into product backlog" id="Insert issue intoproduct backlog_2"/> <sequenceFlow targetRef="Is issue now resolved?_2" sourceRef="Edit Ticket from Level 1 [ID: ${issueID}]: ${issueTitle}_2" name="" id="SequenceFlow_6"/> <sequenceFlow targetRef="ticket closed_2" sourceRef="Send an email back to the Call Center Agent_2" name="" id="SequenceFlow_5"/> <sequenceFlow targetRef="Send a confirmation email back to the Call Center Agent_2" sourceRef="issue reported_2" name="" id="SequenceFlow_3"/> <sequenceFlow targetRef="Handle Problem [ID: ${issueID}]: ${issueTitle}_2" sourceRef="Send a confirmation email back to the Call Center Agent_2" name=""id="SequenceFlow_7"/> <sequenceFlow targetRef="Set the issue classifciation_2" sourceRef="Handle Problem [ID: ${issueID}]: ${issueTitle}_2" name="" id="SequenceFlow_9"/> <sequenceFlow targetRef="Is issue resolved?_2" sourceRef="Set the issue classifciation_2" name="" id="SequenceFlow"/> <sequenceFlow targetRef="Send an email back to the Call Center Agent_2" sourceRef="Insert issue into product backlog_2" name="" id="SequenceFlow_4"/> <sequenceFlow targetRef="Send an email back to the Call Center Agent_2" sourceRef="Is issue resolved?_2" name="" id="SequenceFlow_10"> <conditionExpression xsi:type="tFormalExpression" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">${issueResolved}</conditionExpression> </sequenceFlow> <sequenceFlow targetRef="Edit Ticket from Level 1 [ID: ${issueID}]: ${issueTitle}_2" sourceRef="Is issue resolved?_2" name="" id="SequenceFlow_8"> <conditionExpression xsi:type="tFormalExpression" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">${!issueResolved}</conditionExpression> </sequenceFlow> <sequenceFlow targetRef="Insert issue into product backlog_2" sourceRef="Is issue now resolved?_2" name="" id="SequenceFlow_1"> <conditionExpression xsi:type="tFormalExpression" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">${!issueResolved}</conditionExpression> </sequenceFlow> <sequenceFlow targetRef="Send an email back to the Call Center Agent_2" sourceRef="Is issue now resolved?_2" name="" id="SequenceFlow_2"> <conditionExpression xsi:type="tFormalExpression" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">${issueResolved}</conditionExpression> </sequenceFlow> </process></definitions>

Business-IT-Alignment with executable that‘s Here‘s your to-be- process, ready to models? Huh, looks complicated! Where is the part deploy. Could you please approve? my business? Ehm, it‘s here. And there. And over there. Well somehow, half of that is somone else‘s todo. And some steps and But there are parts of decisions are completely the process (that automated. concern me) missing! Yes but those parts won‘t be executed by the engine. I cannot And what are those model them, they‘d break the technical flow. steps for then? Nobody Call Center specified them! Agent IT Yes but we need those steps. Otherwise we will get data inconsistencies Inconti-what!? This is in the process context. just your coding again, and not my process! I won‘t approve this. Ah, F*** Y**!

This what the Call Center Agent is really interested in • What do I have to do? • Who is the one I must interact with? • How do I work with the system? • What are my concerns?

The User and the Solution collaborate

It‘s all about collaboration! Domain ExpertProcessparticipants Process Process Engineer Engine Domain Expert Domain ExpertProcess Analyst Domain Expert

Kerngedanke #2: Verschiedene Sichten auf Ebene 2 Betrachter Process Participant Process Analyst Process Engineer „Wie muss ich „Wie wird „Was macht die Zentrale Frage arbeiten?“ gearbeitet?“ Engine?“ Eigene Gesamte Orchestrierung der Sicht Orchestrierung Kollaboration Process Engine Ebene 2: Operatives Prozessmodell

Nochmal Reisemanagement

Branche: EnergieversorgerKundenbeispiel: Stromzählerwartung Tool: inubit BPM-Suite

Tool-Unterstützung am Beispiel Signavio

How to apply BPMN in your company Roles & Skills Methods Goals Tooling Meta- Processes

Wir machen uns Gedanken – Sie auch? I wish… I like… I mean… I ask…I hate… I think… I want… I… I need… I suck… BPM-Netzwerk.de Test.BPMN.info BPMB.de camunda.com

Let‘s skip the peak and trough ☺ As-Is To-Be

Vielen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit!

camunda services GmbH Vielen Dank! Zossener Str. 55-58 1096 Berlin 1 Telefon: +49 30 664 0409-00 Telefax: +49 30 664 0409-29 Email: info@camunda.com Bernd Rücker Geschäftsführer bernd.ruecker@camunda.comSOA & BPM DaysDüsseldorf, 23.02.2011 Der Praxis-Blog zu BPM: www.bpm-guide.de

20100223 bpmn

by camunda services GmbH on Feb 23, 2011

Accessibility

Tags

Upload Details

Usage Rights

Statistics

20100223 bpmn — Presentation Transcript