Cathy Gormley Heenan & Kenny McCartan - Making it Matter: Teaching and Learning in Social Science Using an Audience Response System

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Cathy Gormley Heenan & Kenny McCartan - Making it Matter: Teaching and Learning in Social Science Using an Audience Response System - Presentation Transcript

    1. Making it Matter: Teaching and Learning in Social Science Using an Audience Response System Dr. Cathy Gormley-Heenan Dr. Kenny Mc Cartan (University of Ulster - 7th annual elearning conference - Supporting the iGeneration)
    2. What is ARS?
      • Audience Response System
      • PRS/CRS etc.
      • Who Wants to be a Millionaire?
      • Colour cards…
      • … Keypad ‘clickers’
      • Receiver connected to PC
      • Instant results
      • Instant feedback
      • Different systems available
    3. Reasons for using it
      • Student Interaction
      • Improve attentiveness
      • Engage passive listeners
      • Improve knowledge retention
      • Immediate formative feedback
      • Identify struggling students
      • Gain summative feedback
      • Increase Retention
    4. What is Turning Point?
      • Toolbar add-in for PowerPoint
      • Infra-Red, or Radio Frequency
      • Handheld transmitter
      • USB receiver
      • Display questions
      • Collect results
      • Display results immediately
      • WebCT
    5.  
    6. How do you use it?
      • Design questions in TurningPoint 2008
      • Plug in USB receiver
      • Point and click when the lecturer asks a question
      • Results stored in Presentation
      • Anonymous responses
      • Student tracking via device ID
      • Reports created in Excel
      • Import/Export to WebCT
    7. Context of the Case Study
      • First year undergraduates in a politics module
      • Need to foster interest in climate on increasing ‘political apathy’
      • Teaching model based on constructivist principles of engagement and social interaction in the class
      • Questions were chosen with no ‘right’ answer in order to encourage debate and discussion
    8. Results and Discussion
      • Four main benefits were apparent in the student evaluations and focus groups:
      • Student engagement and interaction
      • Increased motivation to attend lectures
      • Ability to contribute to learning experience anonymously
      • Opportunity for self-reflection in confidence without others knowing their responses to the questions on-screen
    9. Student Engagement
      • “ Allows you to hear other people’s opinions”
      • “ Opportunity to see how my opinions sat beside the opinions of my class mates”
      • “ Allowed everyone to express their opinion”
      • 100% of students agreed that using the handsets made the class more interactive and involved the whole class.
      • 95% of students felt that they contributed more to the lectures using the ARS than they did in other classes. 5% neither agreed nor disagreed.
      • One student summed it up: ‘I interacted more because in other classes when a teacher asks a question in other classes there’s silence but when this system is used everyone gives an answer. So in other classes the teacher thinks the students don’t have a clue when really they do, they just don’t want to say it out loud. Also, after the voting is done I’m really motivated to say my part, within seconds I have something on the edge of my tongue’.
    10. Motivation and Maintaining Interest
      • “ Caused the class to be more focused and interact more”
      • Made the class more interesting and made me listen more as I knew I would be asked questions”
      • “ It’s a two-hour lecture – you are bound to lose interest after 15 minutes so the AR system kept me awake, alert and interested”
      • 100% of students agreed that using handsets improved their concentration in the class.
    11. Anonymity
      • ‘ I was very confident in using the response system because (if) I gave the wrong answer I was not embarrassed as the class didn’t know who said what’.
      • ‘ Yes because I would feel wick if I answered something wrong, especially at the start of the year when you don’t know anyone’; ‘
      • Yes, so if I got a question wrong I didn’t feel as stupid as I would have if it was in front of the whole class’.
    12. Contact Details
      • Dr Kenny Mc Cartan
      • Project Co-Ordinator (Technology Adoption)
      • Room 14G13
      • ICT Customer Services
      • Jordanstown campus
      • Ext: 68231
      • Email: [email_address]
      • Dr Cathy Gormley-Heenan
      • Senior Lecturer in Public Policy
      • Room 03A13B
      • School of Policy Studies
      • Jordanstown campus
      • Ext: 66132
      • Email: [email_address]

    + camponecampone, 9 months ago

    custom

    447 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    In recent years, Audience Response (AR) Systems hav more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 447
      • 447 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories