B08 A44s Wp6i En


Published on

Sixth annual International Conference of Territorial Intelligence "Tools and methods of Territorial Intelligence"

Published in: Technology, Economy & Finance
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

B08 A44s Wp6i En

  1. 1. Coordination action of the European Network of Territorial Intelligence Indicators and shapefiles until Communes level for the European Territorial Indicators Portal Guénaël Devillet WP4i/WP6i Leader Christophe Breuer WP4i/WP6i researcher University of Liege - SEGEFA Coordination meeting WP6 - Besançon
  2. 2. <ul><li>Introduction – Objectives </li></ul><ul><li>Data </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Geodata - Shapefiles </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Contextual data </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Choice to do to define a strategy of action </li></ul>Plan of the talk
  3. 3. <ul><li>- WP4i > WP6i Portal indicators </li></ul><ul><li>In practice (first part of the work) : </li></ul><ul><li>How to obtain statistical data ? </li></ul><ul><li>What’s the definition of statistics ? </li></ul><ul><li>How to obtain shapefiles for the cartographic representation ? </li></ul><ul><li>> ULg must bring to the Slovenian team the raw material to be processed for the cartographic representation. </li></ul>1. Introduction and objectives
  4. 4. <ul><li>2.1 – Shapefiles for geographical representation </li></ul><ul><li>2.1.1 Procedure from NUTS 0 to LAU 2 </li></ul><ul><li>2.1.2 Gathering shapefiles </li></ul><ul><li>2.1.3 Unique provider </li></ul><ul><li>2.2 – Data for indicators </li></ul><ul><li>2.2.1 State of work with EUROSTAT </li></ul><ul><li>2.2.2 State of work with national providers </li></ul>2. Data
  5. 5. <ul><li>First step : </li></ul><ul><li>From National level (NUTS) to local administrative level (LAU). </li></ul><ul><li>For example : </li></ul>2.1 . Shapefiles
  6. 6. <ul><li>Second step : </li></ul><ul><li>From lower statistical level to communal level: </li></ul><ul><li>Presentation: “Selection of indicators for the infra-communal level (Wallonie / Provincia de Huelva / Quartiers sensibles de Franche-Comté, Ormansag) </li></ul>2.1 . Shapefiles
  7. 7. <ul><li>Combined procedure to have information on : </li></ul><ul><li>Data </li></ul><ul><li>(contextual data) </li></ul><ul><li>Geodata </li></ul><ul><li>(shapefiles) </li></ul><ul><li>Personalized contact with </li></ul><ul><li>the national statistical </li></ul><ul><li>institutes (email). </li></ul>2.1 . Shapefiles
  8. 8. <ul><li>Gathering result (shapefiles) </li></ul>2.1 . Shapefiles
  9. 9. <ul><li>Problems : </li></ul><ul><li>Diversity of ID – relation between tables and shapefiles </li></ul><ul><li>Diversity of resolution </li></ul><ul><li>Access </li></ul><ul><li>License (cost of accessibility) </li></ul><ul><li>... </li></ul>2.1 . Shapefiles
  10. 10. <ul><li>Solution : EuroGeographics from NUTS 0 to LAU 2 </li></ul>2.1 . Shapefiles
  11. 11. <ul><li>EuroBoundaryMap v2.0 </li></ul><ul><li>Cc EUROSTAT </li></ul><ul><li>Mapping and Statistical national agencies collectively represented by Eurogeographics </li></ul><ul><li>Names </li></ul><ul><li>Unique code </li></ul><ul><li>Geometry </li></ul><ul><li>Relation with infra-communal level </li></ul><ul><li>Reference scale 1:100.000 </li></ul><ul><li>Must be completed with national information about infra-communal level (geometry, code). </li></ul>2.1 . Shapefiles
  12. 12. 2.1 . Shapefiles
  13. 13. <ul><li>EuroGeoGraphics said : </li></ul><ul><li>“ Dear Christophe </li></ul><ul><li>Because you are dealing with a EU funded project , EuroGeographics will give their permission for using EuroBoundaryMap only for internal usage in the project and only during the project period. After that period, the normal commercial issues are in force and a new agreement has to be signed. </li></ul><ul><li>Unfortunately I am going on holiday today and do not have the time to set up the permission for you. Can you please inform me of your deadlines. “ – Holiday until 15 th July </li></ul><ul><li>Normal cost : </li></ul><ul><li>Personal use : ~ 15.500 euros / 2 years </li></ul><ul><li>Internet use : ~ 80.000 euros / 2 years </li></ul>2.1 . Shapefiles
  14. 14. <ul><li>Other providers : </li></ul><ul><li>Gfk Geomarketing- Germany </li></ul><ul><ul><li>All postcode / administrative levels / ... </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Different licenses </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Waiting for answer about costs </li></ul></ul>2.1 . Shapefiles
  15. 15. <ul><li>Work of WP4i : </li></ul><ul><li>Data available on internet </li></ul><ul><li>- links </li></ul><ul><li>- list </li></ul><ul><li>Lower level of availability, but : </li></ul><ul><li>Special structure of data </li></ul><ul><li>Alternative representation </li></ul><ul><li>Different .xls / .tab / .pdf / .doc </li></ul><ul><li>Non-downloadable documents </li></ul>2.2 . Data
  16. 16. <ul><li>Until NUTS 3 : EUROSTAT </li></ul><ul><li>Last completed : 2005 – 2006 </li></ul><ul><li>Files .tab </li></ul><ul><li>ID based on NUTS classification </li></ul><ul><li>No problem of representation </li></ul><ul><li>(Completed) </li></ul>2.2 . Data
  17. 17. <ul><li>LAU 1 / 2 : National providers / Regional providers (DE) </li></ul><ul><li>Internet access to basic data : heterogeneous </li></ul><ul><li>Representation of data : not only downloadable files </li></ul><ul><li>Direct posting </li></ul><ul><li>- Definition of data : variable, not always explained </li></ul><ul><li>Cost of accessibility : variable, expensive </li></ul><ul><li>Recoding : long, expensive </li></ul><ul><li>(Example France : 15 variable, 36783 communes = </li></ul><ul><li>551745 entries = many hours of work) </li></ul>2.2 . Data
  18. 18. 2.2 . Data
  19. 19. 2.2 . Data
  20. 20. <ul><li>Deciding : </li></ul><ul><li>If statistical data are ordered. </li></ul><ul><li>Then for which statistical levels. </li></ul><ul><li>From which price we do not buy the data. </li></ul><ul><li>Who administratively manages the files. </li></ul>3. Choice to make to define an action strategy
  21. 21. Coordination action of the European Network of Territorial Intelligence Selection of indicators for the infra-communal level Examples Guénaël Devillet WP4i/WP6i Leader Christophe Breuer WP4i/WP6i researcher University of Liege - SEGEFA Coordination meeting WP6 - Besançon
  22. 22. <ul><li>Summary of the principle : </li></ul>1. Introduction
  23. 23. <ul><li>Infra-communal level = Statistical sector </li></ul><ul><li>Which indicators : </li></ul><ul><li>Depending on census. </li></ul><ul><li>Depending on statistics. </li></ul><ul><li>Depending on availability in the </li></ul><ul><li>European countries. </li></ul>2. Example « Région wallonne »
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26. <ul><li>Why ? </li></ul><ul><li>- To present “perfect cases” at the conference Besançon 2008 (specifications) </li></ul><ul><li>- To check the system and its ability to take into account different geographical levels and databases (indicators) </li></ul><ul><li>As decided in Pécs, some members should provide infra-communal data. It is necessary to provide statistical cuttings and geodata (contextual data). </li></ul><ul><li>- Belgium (statistical sectors) : ULg - SEGEFA (Christophe) - France (IRIS2000): UFC (Cyril) - Spain (Provincia de Huelva) : UHU (Blanca) - Hungary (Ormansag) : Pécs (Csilla) </li></ul>3. Examples in Europe
  27. 27. <ul><li>Deadline : as soon as possible (July, 31 st ?) </li></ul><ul><li>Definition of indicators for the infra-communal level </li></ul><ul><li>Transmission of information (shapefiles and databases) </li></ul>3. Examples in Europe