Creative writing courses in the academy no longer marginalised
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Creative writing courses in the academy no longer marginalised

on

  • 265 views

AAWP Conference NZ, Creative Writing, Higher Education, Disciplines, Creativity, University Policy, Australia

AAWP Conference NZ, Creative Writing, Higher Education, Disciplines, Creativity, University Policy, Australia

Statistics

Views

Total Views
265
Views on SlideShare
265
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Creative writing courses in the academy no longer marginalised Creative writing courses in the academy no longer marginalised Document Transcript

  • 1 Fourteenth Annual AAWP Conference Margins and Mainstream Waikato Institute of Technology, Hamilton New Zealand 26-28 November 2009Creative Writing Courses in the Academy: no longer Marginalised,and becoming mainstream within the global innovation andcreativity paradigm for academic excellence. AbstractIn 2008 the Australian Federal Government released Venturous Australia, a report which positionedcreativity central to the Innovation and Globalisation rhetoric. In 2009 the Australian ResearchCouncil (ARC) has opened access to the HASS sector (humanities, arts and social science disciplines)to International Collaborative Grants Funding schemes previously only available to the STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering , Medicine) discipline researchers.Minster Carr is on record as stating that to build a knowledge economy for the twenty-first centuryand for Australia to improve its export position amongst comparable OECD nations, such a dividebetween ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ innovation, and the creativity that drives it is no longer appropriate.For academics, researcher and practitioners in Creative Writing programs, as well as for ourcolleagues in other arts-based or practice-led research disciplines we are now encouraged into themainstream educational and societal discourses. We are expected to engage with the globalisationimperatives for Australian Industries, including the publishing and tertiary education industries.In looking at research towards my postdoctoral studies, and research for authoring a chapter for aforthcoming monograph on creativity in a globalised market, I propose that we can no longer beviewed as marginalised within the Academy, nor within the economic and social dialogue aboutAustralia’s future.Carol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 2“If the arts are to be valued as an integral part of Australia’s national innovation system,we must:  Develop an understanding of arts-based knowledge that connects it to innovation  Broaden commercialisation of the arts and creative outputs  Develop the argument for the arts as social inclusion  Educate an innovative workforce Meeting these challenges requires further research, sector-wide coordination and leadership.” (Jaaniste 2008:p.5)This response to Senator Carr’s review into the ‘National Innovation System’(Cutler 2008) by BradHaseman and Luke Jaaniste, from QUT outlines the political and social imperatives that will framethe educational debates within arts and humanities faculties in Australia in the coming months andyears. For those of us studying and working in Creative Arts disciplines, especially those of us inCreative Writing disciplines these imperatives can signify where the academic debates need to focuswithin our own disciplines, sectors, departments, faculties and institutions as well as more broadlywithin the International tertiary education market.I propose that we can unpack this discourse of creativity and innovation to ascertain the broadereconomic and social political machinations at play. I am calling for the de-constuction of this newhegemonic tertiary educational discourse which finds a home within the corporate managerialistpolicies and mission statements of our Universities. (Oakley 2004; May 2006; May and Perry 2006;Atkinson and Easthope 2008)I contend that by linking fuzzy notions of innovation with the as yet under-theorised notion ofcreativity (at least in an Australian context), and to imply a direct correlation between research andexcellence as drivers of national economic prosperity is problematic. (Oakley 2004; Lowrie andWillmott 2006; May and Perry 2006; 2008; Hecq 2008; Smart Business 2009)First I need to look at how in Australia this discourse has taken hold and been acknowledged andprivileged within the Rudd federal government s policy agenda. I have developed a timeline of theemergence of this discourse in the public sphere based on a quick literature overview.(Figure 1) Inoverseas literature creativity and innovation have been linked for decades before the 21st centurybut this timeline illustrates a new paradigm with innovation becoming applied to non-science-baseddiscourse. I must acknowledge that individual Australian State Premiers did recognise the Arts sectoras economic drivers, particularly with the impact in boosting tourism numbers and dollars, but thelinking of innovation with creativity into the term ‘Creative Industries’, with the explicit instrumentalconnotations, was yet to appear in the public discourse. One famous example is SA Premier labellingAdelaide ‘the Athens of the South’ in the mid seventies.Carol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 3 Figure 1: The development of Creativity and Innovation discourse in Australian education and public policy. 2000-9Carol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 4In a paper presented in Barcelona in 2004i, Masayuki Sasaki referred to the following diagram toposition the Creative Industries as drivers of cultural development and innovative thinking, which inturn drives the ‘hard’ innovations needed for turning ideas to practice.Figure 2 Concentric circle model of culture industries: Creative CoreAs Hecq identified in her 2008, paper Banking on Creativityii, she spoke of the need to placecreativity at the centre of the discourse and indeed education practice within our university sector.“Creativity in universities is offered up as a generic skill, no longer limited to practices involving thearts. It has espoused the political agenda that drives the economy to renaissance heights. It is tied inwith development, new ideas and, above all, innovation. Productivity, output, cost effectiveness arehere buzz-words, not creativity. Thus neo-liberal globalisation remains a significant challenge facinguniversities and the creative industries increasingly need to play the game of economics in order tobe included in the system.” iiiFigure 3. Dimensions of Innovation. Based on P Stoneman (2007). An Introduction to the definition and measurement ivof soft innovation, NESTA Working Paper, London.If we compare the system as conceptualised by If we compare the system as conceptualised bySwann, P and Birke, D (2005) as cited in Hecq (2008), we see that the model when applied to theCarol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 5Australian higher education sector, with particular reference to the Creative industries, goes a longway to solving the dualist dilemma faced by universities. What can be ‘sold’ in the education marketas a ‘quality innovative research paradigm’ is also able to meet the needs of the local educationmarket, identified by the Bradley Reportv. If we allow students to study where their interest andindeed skills lie, we can address the predicted shortage of skilled labour for the knowledgeworkforce in the twenty-first century, whilst maintaining competitive rankings on the global qualityscales of measurement.Figure 4: Linking Creativity and Design to Business Performance. Source: Swann, P and Birke, D (2005) ‘How do creativity viand design enhance business performance? A Framework for interpreting the evidence’ DTI Think Piece, University ofNottingham Business School, as cited by Howard (2008) CHASS Occasional Paper Number 5By noting the student-demand and interests shown by Australian Government’s own statisticaldata, the Creative Arts disciplines in Australian Universities has experienced growth over a numberof years. Looking at the Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relationspublication; Selected Higher Education Statistics: Award Course Completions between 1996 and2007 (the most recent complete data set) the 5 change in domestic student numbers in Creative Artsfields of study has increased at 3.9%, the second largest increase apart from in the Health fields ofstudy with 7.7% . If we include the field of study classified as Society and Culture there has been afurther 2.2% increase in domestic student numbers across the decade.The increase is not confined to only domestic students with a smaller but still substantial increase inthe number of overseas students completing awards in the Creative Arts field of study; a 5.1 %increase third to both Hospitality and Personnel Services (460.5%) and 8.8 % increase formanagement and commerce. The exponential growth in hospitality and personal services studentnumbers amongst overseas students can be accounted for this area of qualification being on theAustralian Government’s skilled shortages list of priority study/immigration programs and theincrease is from a traditionally low base, reflecting the fields’ recent place within Universitycurricula. By ignoring the statistics for the problematic field of hospitality and personal services foroverseas students, if we add the increase for overseas students studying society and culture fields ofresearch, we can see a 1.8% increase in these fields also.Carol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 6 Figure 5: DEEWR Award Course Completions for All Students by Citizenship and Broad Field of Study, 1996 to 2007 (Government of Australia 2009) (a) Data for 1996–2000 have been mapped from field of study classification to field of education classification. (b) The data take into account the coding of combined courses to two fields of education. As a consequence, counting both fields of education for combined courses means that the totals may be less than the sum across all broad fields of education.Carol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 7With Creative Arts courses proving popular with students and demonstrating consistent annualincreased enrolments and award completions, it has been inevitable that there has been a studentdriven demand for higher degree programs in the Creative Arts disciplines across the decade.In the paper, Describing the creative writing thesis : a census of creative writing doctorates, 2001 -2007, Boyd (Boyd 2009) has determined that the aggregate of award course completions for creativearts doctorates by research has increased over the period from 80 in 2001 to 202 in 2007. Thenumber considered ‘creative theses’ is 199. Thus we can extrapolate that there is an increasingdemand for student places within Creative Writing higher degrees which is most probably replicatedacross the broader fields of creative arts research and practice in Australian Universities. Moreresearch is being done in this area particularly by Dr Paul Thomas at Curtin University and Ms GiselleKett at the Victorian College of the Arts, but no definitive data is currently available.“In Australia, over the past decade there has been a steady increase in both the number of PhDprograms in the creative arts and also in the number of candidates enrolled”.(Creative Arts PhDProjects Roundtable 2008: p.8)Given the consensus within the Creative Arts Disciplines it seems that the Creative Arts are driving asubstantial increase in student demand within our Universities, and if we accept the Prime MinisterKevin Rudd’s imperative in his closing speech at the 2020 summit; ‘to put to bed the false dichotomybetween the arts and sciences” it is increasingly important for Australian Universities to recognisethe contributions to knowledge made in the Creative Arts disciplines. The Government reinforcesthis new alignment or strategic direction for our Universities but as yet few have taken this on boardin any systematic and meaningful way. There are some attempts to position the discourse withinthe various University strategic plans but at this stage I would contend that it is merely ‘windowdressing’ to camouflage the lack of administrative will to cater for the HCA disciplines, other than asa source of “bums on seats” and EFTS dollars.Our Universities are slow to respond to institutional change, particularly when it is not tied toadditional sources of Government funding. We may have regulatory authorities to audit thepractices of our Universities but in the case of the Creative Arts (particularly Creative Writing), whereis the policy imperative to recognise academic staff’s creative work as research output or researchequivalency? Some Universities have moved their bibliometrics to include these works but somehave not. There still exists no formal sanctions for non-compliance in this area under the newExcellence in Research Australia introductory period..If academic –practitioners creative work in the Creative Arts remain unrecognised and undervalued,how can the disciplines ensure that students are taken seriously, despite Cutler’s determination that“Australia’s innovation policy needs to acknowledge and incorporate the role of the creative andliberal arts” (Cutler 2008: p.48) for the National benefit?As Luke Jaaniste Research Fellow in Queensland University of Technology’s Creative IndustriesFaculty, states, “This response holds the perspective that the creative arts and broader humanities(HASS sector) can drive, produce, apply and diffuse innovation, in different but equally useful waysto the STEM sector... it does not adequately follow this through in the substance of its discussionsand recommendations.” (Jaaniste 2008)Carol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 8These “new” destinations, particularly collaboration with the ‘emerging’ research nations, (India,China and South America) together with a re-invigourated discourse with interdisciplinary focus forArts disciplines, as implicit in the new ERA field of research codes for the HCA sector (humanities andcreative arts sector) demonstrates the agenda is underpinned by a rhetoric of globalisation.With the Higher Education sector increasingly positioned as product driven industry with exportearning capacity there has been a radical altering of education policy and institutional strategicplanning to take advantage of scarce Government funds from an increasingly competitive nationalgrants schemes (ARC and NHMRC). Yet Universities have been slow to change their own StrategicPlans over the last twelve months.In a ‘pull no punches’ breakfast address to the National Tertiary Education Union, Simon Marginsonfrom the Centre for the Study of Higher Education at the University of Melbourne, summarised thecurrent situation in 2009.“Australia is the only country in that world that uses its top 200 research universities to shore up thebalance of trade. We are the only nation where these universities enrol 10,000 fee payinginternational students and more just to balance the books. And the only nation where for every dollarraised in international income, national government has taken the opportunity to cut a dollar fromits own allocations to the universities, leaving them no better off than before in financial terms butwith the added burden of sustaining the export sector. Australia has become a by-word for quantitynot quality, and hustling not scholarship, in the international education market.”(Marginson 2009)In the Creative Arts disciplines, particularly in Creative Writing, it is critical that Universities heedthese shifts in educational policy, as the future Government funding initiatives such as theInternational Science Linkages for the HCA sector, administered by the Australian Academy ofHumanities demand a broadening of the education being provided and indeed marketed to both thedomestic and international students. It is the contention of this paper that the HCA (Humanities andCreative Arts ERA cluster) disciplines are well suited to capitalise on the development of nicheeducation markets, both at home and abroad.Firstly, let’s examine the international and global education agenda as outlined in the most recentpolicy document from the Australian Federal Government’s Department of Innovation, Industry,Science and Research; Powering Ideas: An Innovation Agenda for the Twenty First Century. Value isnow to be recognised for research proposals and projects that enhance international co-operationand collaboration between individual researchers and discipline clusters across like-minded globalpartners.viiThese global partners correspond with the worlds rapidly growing economies of Asia where thereare existing models for research collaboration in place under the Science Division’s Co-operativeResearch Centres, whose charter is to:"To deliver significant economic, environmental and social benefits to Australia by supporting end-user driven research partnerships between publicly funded researchers and end-users to addressclearly articulated, major challenges that require medium to long term collaborative efforts."The CRC Program links researchers with industry to focus R&D efforts on progress towards utilisationand commercialisation. The close interaction between researchers and the users of research is a keyCarol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 9feature of the Program. Another feature is industry contribution to CRC education programs toproduce industry-ready graduates. To date there have been a total of 168 CRCs.There are currently 48 CRCs operating in 6 sectors: environment (10), agriculture and rural-basedmanufacturing (14), information and communication technology (5), mining and energy (4), medicalscience and technology (8) and manufacturing technology (7).(Government of Australia 2009)However despite the apparent primary target being the existing six CRC sectors and generallyseeking research relationships across the emerging economic giants of the world economy, there isalso the imperative to continue Australian involvement in developing collaborations and allianceswith our Asia Pacific Partners. Japan, Indonesia. Chile and Brazil were recently identified at ameeting between ‘interested’ academic members of the Australian Academy of Humanities and theDIIR National roadshow at Melbourne University in May 2009.Here Dr Jon Lewis, Manager of the Asia, Pacific and Africa International Science Branch of theScience and Research Division (of the Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research)encouraged all researchers from all disciplines within the HCA sector to investigate and takeadvantage of these grant schemes as the Minister Kim Carr has publicly indicated that the “falsedichotomy” between the Arts and Sciences serves no purpose under Prime Minister Rudd’s newlyconceptualised notion of innovation and research. The old privileging of the STEM (science,technology, engineering and mathematics) disciplines in the academy cannot meet the Nationsneeds for innovation as it is bound within idea of ‘hard’ innovation which in turn constrains andignores the ‘soft’ innovation found in non STEM disciplines, ‘as if creativity is somehow this thingthat only applies to the arts, and innovation is this thing over here which applies uniquely to thesciences, or technology, or design.’(Cutler 2008: p.47)The ramification of this shift in focus challenging “the ‘great cultural divide’ that needs rethinking,between the realm of the conceptual, the intellectual [on the one hand] and the artisan andcraftsman [on the other]” (Jaaniste 2008citing Venturous Australia p.48) is that Universities mustreconfigure their own disciplinary structures and search out new research synergies.The opportunities for exploring uncharted research terrain and pedagogy within the Creative Writingdiscipline has never been more encouraged or supported under a [life] raft of new funding schemesand additional openings within previously limited and targeted schemes. We now have animperative to expand our existing national and international collaborative research linkages. We areencouraged to launch cross and interdisciplinary research to enhance both academic credibility forthe discipline and to ensure direct practical applications within our Industry sector and communities.At Australia’s dual sector universities (Technical and Further Education & Higher Education), theopportunity is present for universities to position themselves as Australian, and indeed world leadersin workforce linked education by using the now accepted, (academically and structurally), andhighly sought after (by students), practice-led research pedagogy and theorising.The Australian Government in the paper, Powering Ideas: an innovation agenda for the Twenty-firstcentury, (Senator Kim Carr 2009) correctly links Australia’s economic prosperity with thedevelopment of an educated and highly skilled workforce. This skilled workforce is aspired to by allOECD nations in the current quest to build knowledge economies more adaptable to technologicaland scientific change than previous workforces.Carol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 10By challenging the traditional conception of academic knowledge the ‘innovation agenda’ stressesthe importance of the synergies between education (particularly tertiary education), culture, arts,science and technology.It is within this conceptual framework that the Rudd Government is pushing ahead with reforms toall levels of education, early childhood, pre-school, primary, secondary and tertiary, as articulated inthe 2009 budget in response to the Cutler Review, Venturous Australia into the National InnovationSystem, the subsequent Powering Ideas report and finally the Bradley Review into Higher Education.Each document stresses the need for dismantling false disciplinary boundaries, especially those thatform the science/humanities dichotomy, the need to view education as an Industry (from cradle tograve or as is the favoured buzz words; “life-long learning”) that both provides the skilled knowledgeworkers for growth export industries, and positions education as an export commodity especiallythroughout the Asia Pacific region. At the same time these reports look towards the ‘old world’ asrepresented by the OECD and UNESCO.When examining the OECD reports into Higher Education and indeed, into the education sectormore generally, there exists a common master discourse driving policy formulations andgovernment interventions. Whilst attempting to reconceptualise the imperatives for economicdevelopment and sustainability by seeking answers from the education sector and its researchexperts, there is also the recognition that globalisation can be accompanied by the negatives ofcolonialism. By looking both towards the newly developing world, and simultaneously towards thefirst world there is a place created where culture, nation and region can be identified.Thus in terms of quality measures of universities we are now looking at all the relevant metrics inoperation throughout the member states of the OECD. As mentioned earlier in this paper, the mostexciting for non-science based disciplines is the recognition granted to the disciplines charged withmapping human history, social change and cultural developments, the Humanities and SocialSciences, are having their research work judged alongside the research generated by ‘hard sciences’.In Australia with the ERA (Excellence in Research Australia), in the UK’s RAE (Research AssessmentExercise)viii and in Asia with the Taiwan Humanities Indexix, creative works are allowed ‘researchpoints’ and recognition as practice-based or practice-led research. It is allowing for the nexusbetween innovation and practice to be reconceptualised as being driven by both ‘hard’ and ‘soft’research and innovation.Carol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 11Figure 6: Type and number of thesis awarded by university by 30 June 2008Taken from Boyd (2009)Carol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 12Bibliography:(2008). "Closing the Innovation Gap: Reigniting the Spark of Creativity in a Global Economy." IndustryWeek 257(11): 62.Atkinson, R. and H. Easthope (2008). "The Creative Class in Utero? The Australian City, the CreativeEconomy and the Role of Higher Education." Built Environment 34(3): 11.Boyd, N. (2009). "Describing the creative writing thesis: a census of creative writing doctorates, 1993- 2008." Text 13(1).Creative Arts PhD Projects Roundtable (2008). Future Proofing the Creative Arts in Higher Education:a scoping project for quality in creative arts research training. Melbourne, University of MelbourneCollege of the Arts: 11.Cutler, T. (2008). Venturous Australia: Building Strength in Innovation. I. Department of Innovation,Science and Research. North Melbourne, Cutler and Company Ltd.Cutler, T. (2008). Venturous Australia:Report on the Review into the National Innovation System. T.Cutler. Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.Government of Australia (2009). Co-operative Research Centres. I. Department of Innovation,Science and Research. Canberra, AGPS.Government of Australia (2009). Higher Education Student Statistics Collection 2007 DEEWR.Canberra, AGPS.Hecq, D. (2008). Banking on creativity?, Australian Association of Writing Programs.Jaaniste, L. (2008) Comments on the Review of the national Innovation System (RNIS): Responding tothe RNIS Report, Venturous Australia: building strength in innovation.Jaaniste, L. (2008) Response to Venturous Australia: comments on the Review into the NationalInnovation System. QUT Digital RepositoryLowrie, A. and H. Willmott (2006). "Marketing Higher Education: The Promotion of Relevance andthe Relevance of Promotion." Social Epistemology 20(3/4): 221-240. This paper examines the marketization of higher education. It takes the curriculum development for a degree sponsored by industry as a focus for exploring the involvement of industry and, more specifically, prospective employers, in shaping higher education provision. Empirical material gathered from a three and a half―year ethnographic study is used to illustrate how mundane promotional work associated with sponsored curricula operates to reconstitute higher education. It is shown how, in the process of introducing sponsored curricula into the university, a market relevance discourse is merged with traditional discourse to promote a new discursive order and thereby contribute to the reformation of university education. This hybrid discourse (of tradition and relevance) makes traditional resistance to the encroachment of “relevance― into university education more difficult to justify, and perhaps impossible to sustain. Nonetheless, it produces new antagonisms that provide future sites of resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]Copyright of Social Epistemology is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holders expressCarol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 13 written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts)Marginson, S. (2009) Australian Education and the World: has the Bradley Report got it right? NTEUBreakfast ForumMay, T. (2006). "Universities: Space, Governance and Transformation." Social Epistemology 20(3):333 - 345. This paper takes up the themes in the articles and examines not only the environmental changes that are taking place in relation to universities, but also the dynamics of their organizational implications. It argues that there are parallels between managerially and academic professionalism in that both deny context. Arguing for a context-sensitivity that is not dependant, issues of space and governance become important in order to understand forms of knowledge and the relationship between the contexts of production and the contents of what is produced. Universities have different capacities to play at the game of scales and they are judged according to abstract indicators that provide little or no opportunity for learning. Instead of examining these relations, expertise is assumed to be spatial, whilst universities transform themselves in the slipstream of imagined futures as if they were separate from the present and past. Understanding is lost in the process and so too are the opportunities to adequately examine the differences in types of knowledge’s that are produced for sustainable futures in contemporary societies.May, T. and B. Perry (2006). "Cities, Knowledge and Universities: Transformations in the Image of theIntangible." Social Epistemology 20(3/4): 259-282. The current higher educational landscape in the UK is marked by complex sets of expectations, accompanied by efforts to encourage universities into diversifying and stratifying functions. Yet the picture is far from clear and a number of tensions and contradictions remain, such as in relation to incentivisation and reward structures which impact differentially on universities. For universities that attempt to translate these agendas into meaningful actions at the local level, the result is a mixture of enthusiasm, engagement, retreat and defence. This article will demonstrate such processes in action through a discussion of the ongoing “Manchester––Knowledge Capital― initiative, which seeks to bring local and regional partners and universities together to create a critically acclaimed global pivot to the emerging knowledge economy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]Copyright of Social Epistemology is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holders express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts)Oakley, K. (2004). "Not So Cool Britannia: The Role of the Creative Industries in EconomicDevelopment." International Journal of Cultural Studies 7(1): 67-77. This article provides a brief overview of current UK policy and practice in the area of the creative industries and economic development and aims to raise concerns about what I see as the problems arising in the implementation of these policies. It argues that the desire to use creative industries as a single weapon with which to turn around economically depressed regions risks creating polarized and unsustainable economic development.Carol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.
  • 14 Creative industries developments, if they are to succeed, cannot be disconnected from the cultural policies that nurtured them and the social policies that can help to sustain them.Senator Kim Carr (2009). Powering Ideas: An Innovation Agenda for the Twenty-first Century. .Canberra, Commonwealth Government.Smart Business (2009). "Innovation renovation." Smart Business 5(5): 16-16. The article reviews the book "Closing the Innovation Gap: Reigniting the Spark of Creativity in a Global Economy," by Judy Estrin.i Sasaki, M. (2004) The Role of Culture in Urban Regeneration. Paper presented at the Diàlegs - FòrumUniversal de les Cultures – Barcelona 2004.http://www.barcelona2004.org/esp/banco_del_conocimiento/docs/PO_22_EN_SASAKI.pdf Originallyaccessed August 2007.ii Hecq, D. Banking on Creativity. Conference Paper presented at the Australian Association of WritingPrograms Annual Conference: Creativity and Uncertainty at the University of Technology, Sydney. November2008. (Publication forthcoming).iii Howard, J.H. (2008) Between a hard rock and a soft space: design, creative practice and innovation. CHASSOccasional Paper Number 5. www.chass.org.au/papers/pdf/PAP20080521JH.pdf Accessed August 2008iv NESTA National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts. U.K.v Bradley, D. (2008) Review of Australian Higher Education.http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Review/Pages/ReviewofAustralianHigherEducationReport.aspxAccessed July 17, 2009.vi www.berr.gov.uk/files/file14794.pdf Accessed July 25, 2009vii Powering Ideas: An Innovation Agenda for the Twenty-first Century. Australian Government. Released May13, 2009 Accessed June 2, 2009.viii http://www.rae.ac.uk/ Accessed July 20, 2009ix http://www.lis.ntu.edu.tw/~khchen/writtings/pdf/p410.pdf Accessed July 20, 2009Carol-Anne Croker: Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria. Australia.