Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
香港六合彩
香港六合彩
香港六合彩
香港六合彩
香港六合彩
香港六合彩
香港六合彩
香港六合彩
香港六合彩
香港六合彩
香港六合彩
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

香港六合彩

561

Published on

秀的女生. …

秀的女生.
建议香港六合彩以后从事环保工作,比如马路天使什么的,为四零五零工程作点儿贡献.
而现在呢?香港六合彩也开始叛逆了!香港六合彩不爱扫大街了!香港六合彩这个叛徒!!难道香港六合彩把皇军许我的那点好处都吃了回扣了吗?
我拷,让香港六合彩来振臂高呼,叛徒高尚!叛徒万岁万万岁!!
七.1.大四时光其实是很无聊的,这可由大头的行为得到最好的证明.
大头同志在学习英语之余疯狂地迷上了抓老鼠这一体育项目——香港六合彩发明了一种擒拿鼠辈们的完美策略,这个方法的确非常好,所以这里作

Published in: Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
561
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. UAW Classification Audit Committee Report Committee Members: Sherry Saarinen, Cathy Banfield, Barb Ruotsala, Mike Abbott, Paula Zenner, Sharron Paris Becky Christianson, Facilitator
  • 2. Charge to the committee <ul><li>Make form more user friendly </li></ul><ul><li>Make sure categories are weighted correctly </li></ul><ul><li>Dealing with anomalies where it perceived the tool doesn’t fit </li></ul><ul><li>Address changing technology </li></ul><ul><li>Coming up with better ways to define what positions do </li></ul><ul><li>What value does the tool/process bring to MTU? </li></ul>
  • 3. How we got to where we are now <ul><li>Decided that it would be important to ask office professionals and supervisors what they wanted/needed in an audit tool </li></ul><ul><li>Offered 5 focus group times to supervisors and 7 times to office professionals </li></ul><ul><li>Conducted focus groups during December </li></ul><ul><li>Compiled results and took back to the committee </li></ul>
  • 4. What we learned from OP <ul><li>Current tool was frustrating to complete (what do they want to know???) </li></ul><ul><li>Concerns about not being upgraded </li></ul><ul><li>People had lost faith in the process </li></ul><ul><li>Hard to write down what people do </li></ul><ul><li>There must be ‘magic words’ to get an upgrade </li></ul><ul><li>Lists of duties vary from department to department </li></ul>
  • 5. What we learned from supervisors <ul><li>Current tool is intimidating </li></ul><ul><li>What are the “right words” needed to complete an audit form? </li></ul><ul><li>Need to reduce the “fear factor” around the process </li></ul><ul><li>Person and position are difficult to separate </li></ul><ul><li>Want fairness in the process </li></ul><ul><li>Budget issues around upgrades </li></ul>
  • 6. Proceeding from focus groups <ul><li>Needed to re-examine categories and weight of each </li></ul><ul><li>Improve tool to make more user-friendly </li></ul><ul><li>Discussed creating guide for Office Professionals and what to include </li></ul><ul><li>Added list of Action Verbs to guide </li></ul><ul><li>Have audit tool and guide available on the web </li></ul>
  • 7. Next Steps <ul><li>Decided to integrate check boxes into the form </li></ul><ul><li>Examined current form for appropriateness </li></ul><ul><li>How have positions changed since the current form was created? </li></ul><ul><li>What categories have changed since the current form was created? </li></ul><ul><li>Original plan was to roll out the ‘new form’ in mid February… </li></ul>
  • 8. Benchmarking <ul><li>Web search resulted in at least 15 forms to benchmark </li></ul><ul><li>Forms ranged from 2 to 17 pages </li></ul><ul><li>Good ideas/wording to incorporate into our form (obtained permission from schools) </li></ul><ul><li>Pre-audit information </li></ul><ul><li>Office Professional guide </li></ul><ul><li>Stuff available on the web </li></ul>
  • 9. Energizer ® bunnies… <ul><li>Almost finished with the OP guide when it was decided to add a supervisor guide </li></ul><ul><li>Examined and changed distribution of categories to reflect current positions </li></ul><ul><li>Developed FAQ sections for each guide from focus group questions/comments </li></ul><ul><li>Finalized form check boxes </li></ul><ul><li>Tested new audit form with recent auditees </li></ul><ul><li>Took tool and guides back to focus group participants for comments and suggestions </li></ul>
  • 10. Issues still out there… <ul><li>Position not upgraded after audit – position was correctly classified; is not a reflection on the person in the position </li></ul><ul><li>Is not a ‘template’ for a level 4 or level 5 – positions vary too much across campus </li></ul><ul><li>Difficult to separate person from the position </li></ul><ul><li>Need to use tool to evaluate postings to ensure consistency </li></ul>
  • 11. Final Products <ul><li>Pre-audit information </li></ul><ul><li>Office Professional Audit Form (Microsoft Word ® document with check and text boxes – can be saved) </li></ul><ul><li>Office Professional Audit Form Guide </li></ul><ul><li>Supervisor Guide </li></ul><ul><li>All will be available on web </li></ul>

×