Web 2.0 Best Practices in Library and Information Literacy Instruction

  • 1,712 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
  • Very interesting ppt. The research indicated PPT only contains 30% of information; therefore the 70% valuable information comes from the presenter himself/herself. soEZLecturing.com provides you a chance to record your voice with your PowerPoint presentation and upload to the website. It can share with more readers and also promote your presentation more effectively on soEZLecturing.com.
    www.soezlecturing.com
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,712
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
27
Comments
1
Likes
1

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Best Practices in Using Web 2.0 for Library Instruction and Information Literacy By Breanna Weston
  • 2. Web 2.0 Characteristics http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
  • 3. Library 2.0 www.hetemeel.com
  • 4. Purpose Advantages Audience Best Practices Duplicity Teach Simplicity Best practices
  • 5. http://web2.wsj2.com/all_we_got_was_web_10_when_tim_bernerslee_actually_gave_us_w.htm
  • 6. Web 2.0 Characteristics • Communication • Community • Content • Rich user experience • Participation • Transparency
  • 7. Communication
  • 8. Community http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabid=19
  • 9. Content http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2007/12/15/us/politics/DEBATE.html
  • 10. Participation http://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewhanelly/2738791563/
  • 11. Rich User Experience
  • 12. Transparency
  • 13. Web 2.0 Characteristics • Communication • Community • Content • Rich user experience • Participation • Transparency
  • 14. Library 2.0
  • 15. Communication
  • 16. Community http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabid=19
  • 17. Content http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2007/12/15/us/politics/DEBATE.html
  • 18. Participation http://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewhanelly/2738791563/
  • 19. Rich User Experience
  • 20. Transparency
  • 21. Web 2.0 Characteristics • Communication • Community • Content • Rich user experience • Participation • Transparency Library 2.0
  • 22. Purpose Advantages Audience Best Practices Duplicity Teach Simplicity Best practices
  • 23. Purpose http://www.itqb.unl.pt/news/a-swiss-army-knife-for-rna-degradation/image/image_view_fullscreen
  • 24. Audience http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22500/22500-h/22500-h.htm#Page_31
  • 25. Teach Faculty http://www.graffiti.org/dj/n-igma13/district/large/teach.jpg
  • 26. Simplicity http://allfunny.net/index.php/funny-pictures/Page-9.html
  • 27. Duplicity The Cat in the Hat by Dr. Seuss
  • 28. Advantages
  • 29. Purpose Advantages Audience Best Practices Duplicity Teach Simplicity Best practices
  • 30. Web 2.0 Characteristics • Communication • Community • Content • Rich user experience • Participation • Transparency Library 2.0
  • 31. Library 2.0
  • 32. Purpose Advantages Audience Best Practices Duplicity Teach Simplicity Best practices
  • 33. References • O'Reilly, Tim. quot;What Is Web 2.0 | O'Reilly Media.quot; O'Reilly Media - Spreading the knowledge of technology innovators. 1 May 2009 <http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html>. • Hinchcliffe, Dion . quot;All We Got Was Web 1.0, When Tim Berners-Lee Actually Gave Us Web 2.0 [Dion Hinchcliffe's Web 2.0 Blog].quot; Dion Hinchcliffe's Web 2.0 Blog. 1 May 2009 <http://web2.wsj2.com/all_we_got_was_web_10_whe • Casey, Michael E., and Laura C. Savastinuk. quot;Library 2.0 - 9/1/2006 - Library Journal.quot; Library Journal: Library News, Reviews, and Views. 1 May 2009 <http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6365200.html>. • Crawford, Walt. (2006). Library 2.0 and 'Library 2.0'quot; Cites and Insights 6, 2. January 2006.
  • 34. Thank you! Questions?