2009 Child Support, Spousal Support and Alimony Pendente Lite

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    2009 Child Support, Spousal Support and Alimony Pendente Lite - Presentation Transcript

    1. Child Support, Spousal Support and APL Brian C. Vertz ESQ, MBA Pollock Begg Komar Glasser LLC Pittsburgh BVSource.com
    2. Estate of Johnson, 970 A.2d 433 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Post Mortem Child Support
      • Settlement Agreement
        • Child Support Ends at Age 18
        • Agreement Binding on Heirs
      Pages 1-3 BVSource.com
    3. Estate of Johnson, 970 A.2d 433 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Superior Court held:
        • Agreement did not explicitly terminate child support upon a parent’s death
        • State law terminating child support could not be inferred in the contract
        • But Social Security derivative benefit satisfied the obligation
      BVSource.com
    4. Estate of Johnson, 970 A.2d 433 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Practice tips:
        • Scrutinize boilerplate language
        • Specify when child support ends and consider life insurance as security
        • College support provisions must be sufficiently definite
        • Is post-mortem child support modifiable?
      BVSource.com
    5. Murphy v. McDermott, 2009 WL 2365992 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • 2 years of parochial pre-school
      • Father paid – reluctantly but voluntarily
      • Interim support order, incl. tuition
      • Father refused to pay kindergarten
      • Final support hearing – too late to object
      Pages 4-5 BVSource.com
    6. Murphy v. McDermott, 2009 WL 2365992 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Gibbons v. Kugle (2006)
        • Whether child will benefit
        • Standard of living
      • Is parochial or private school always better than public?
      BVSource.com
    7. Murphy v. McDermott, 2009 WL 2365992 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Dissent: Judge Fitzgerald
        • Would create a presumption that public school is good enough unless shown to be manifestly deficient
      BVSource.com
    8. Murphy v. McDermott, 2009 WL 2365992 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Practice tips:
        • Litigate school choice in custody forum before it arises in support court
        • Status quo matters
        • Stock options and capital gains cannot be projected if non-recurring
        • Employer 401K contributions must be tax-affected
      BVSource.com
    9. Fisher v. Com ., 2008 WL 6693399 (Supreme Ct., August 17, 2009)
      • Appeal dismissed as moot
      • Dissent: Justices Eakin/McCaffery
        • Divorce Code definition of “income” should not prevent Dept. of Corrections from invading gift money to collect delinquent child support
        • Enforcement not restricted to “income”
      Page 6 BVSource.com
    10. Krebs v. Krebs (“Krebs II”), 2009 WL 1759726 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Retroactive modification of support was granted in Krebs I due to failure to report increased income
        • No new job
        • No promotion
      • Remanded to calculate arrears, interest and legal fees
      Pages 6-8 BVSource.com
    11. Krebs v. Krebs (“Krebs II”), 2009 WL 1759726 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • $15,000+ in legal fees to collect $72,000 child support
      • Trial court awarded $5,000
      • Superior Court granted 100%
      BVSource.com
    12. Krebs v. Krebs (“Krebs II”), 2009 WL 1759726 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Dissent: Klein
        • Not agree with overruling the trial court’s factual finding - fees were “excessive”
        • Remand would merely cause parties to incur more fees
      BVSource.com
    13. Krebs v. Krebs (“Krebs II”), 2009 WL 1759726 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Practice tips:
        • Reporting income changes is crucial
        • Citing torturous history may lead to 100% award of legal fees
      BVSource.com
    14. Rich v. Rich, 967 A.2d 400 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Melzer child support
      • Mother had moderate lifestyle after separation
      • No budget (or, vague budget)
      • Mother had no income, so Father was responsible for 100% children’s expenses
      Pages 8-11 BVSource.com
    15. Rich v. Rich, 967 A.2d 400 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Father’s issues on appeal
        • Wife should be estopped from asserting credit card expenses because she did not present enough evidence
        • Budget should be cut 25% when eldest of 4 children goes to college
        • Mother should repay the overpayment faster than $4,000 per month
      BVSource.com
    16. Rich v. Rich, 967 A.2d 400 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Wife’s issues:
        • Support order < 2% of Father’s income
        • Mother had received $10,000/month spending money during marriage
        • Presumptive minimum guideline would be closer to 15% of Father’s income
      BVSource.com
    17. Rich v. Rich, 967 A.2d 400 (Pa.Super. 2009)
      • Practice tips:
        • Quantitative evidence may be more persuasive than qualitative evidence
        • No “per capita” in Melzer cases
        • Should the lawyer tell a spouse to go on a spending spree upon separation?
      BVSource.com
    18. Plunkard v. McConnell, 962 A.2d 1227 (Pa.Super. 2008)
      • Child Support Arrears
        • Pre-incarceration arrears
        • Arrears during incarceration
      • 2006 amendments – Rule 1910.19(f)
        • Court may suspend obligation and forgive arrearages
      Pages 11-12 BVSource.com
    19. R.C. v. J.S., 957 A.2d 759 (Pa.Super. 2008)
      • Child Admitted to Mental Health Facility
      • Mother continued to collect child support
      • Physical custody not required to file a support action
      Page 12 BVSource.com
    20. R.W.E. v. A.B.K., 961 A.2d 161 (Pa.Super. 2008)
      • Mother’s live-in boyfriend was named on birth certificate and supported child
      • Real father was never informed
      • Mother got an interim support order against her live-in boyfriend
      • Father’s paternity was revealed in custody battle between Mother and her live-in boyfriend
      Pages 13-14 BVSource.com
    21. R.W.E. v. A.B.K., 961 A.2d 161 (Pa.Super. 2008)
      • Superior Court held:
        • Father was not estopped from challenging the birth certificate
        • Live-in boyfriend could not assert paternity by estoppel as a sword
        • Interim support order was nullity because it was entered after appeal was filed
      BVSource.com
    22. Kozel v. Kozel, No. FD98-00761 (Allegheny Co., June 30, 2008)
      • 10+ years of litigation
      • Appeals exhausted
      • Mother filed petition for modification of child support
      • Mother alleged that her expenses had increased
      Pages 14-15 BVSource.com
    23. Kozel v. Kozel, No. FD98-00761 (Allegheny Co., June 30, 2008)
      • Trial court dismissed petition for failure to state a claim (demurrer)
      • Mother requested reconsideration:
      • “All of Mother’s expenses from prior support proceeding have increased”
      BVSource.com
    24. Kozel v. Kozel, No. FD98-00761 (Allegheny Co., June 30, 2008)
      • Practice tips:
        • Petition for modification must give enough detail to prove materiality
        • Petition for modification so soon after appeals may be viewed as an attempt to re-litigate issues
        • What about “3 years have passed”?
      BVSource.com
    25. Silver v. Pinskey, (2009 WL 2933760, September 15 2009)
      • Superior Court en banc
      • Social Security derivative benefits received by children’s father
      • Equally shared physical custody
      BVSource.com
    26. Topics on BV Source .com
      • Components of Income
        • Bonuses
        • Executive Compensation
      • Double dipping
      • Melzer issues
      BVSource.com

    + Brian VertzBrian Vertz, 1 month ago

    custom

    236 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    This presentation contains summaries of the latest more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 236
      • 205 on SlideShare
      • 31 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 31 views on http://www.bvsource.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 31 views on http://www.bvsource.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories