2008 Support Update

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    2008 Support Update - Presentation Transcript

    1. Support Law Update 2008 Brian C. Vertz, Esq., MBA, AVA Pollock Begg Komar Glasser LLC BVsource.com
    2. Support Law Update 2008
      • Case Law Update
      • Recommendation 91 Proposed Changes – Support Guidelines
      • Processing a PACSES Order
    3. Celebrity Divorce Update
      • Guy Richie vs. Madonna
    4. Conroy v. Rosenwald 940 A.2d 409 (Pa.Super.2007)
      • No “poisonous tree”
    5. Conroy v. Rosenwald Jennifer Conroy Michael Guinan (live-in boyfriend)_ Glen Rosenwald (boss) child
    6. Conroy v. Rosenwald
      • Remand: hearing on estoppel defense
        • Reinstated support order prospectively
        • Denied retroactivity prior to paternity test
      • Superior Court affirmed
    7. Ferguson v. McKiernan 940 A.2d. 1236 (Pa.2007)
      • Parents May Not Waive Child Support.... ?!
    8. Ferguson v. McTiernan
      • Mother conceived child with Sperm Donor (her former boyfriend) by IVF procedure
        • Assured boyfriend that his role would be kept confidential
        • Agreed to waive child support in exchange for donor’s waiver of custody rights
        • Told clinic that donor was her husband
    9. Ferguson v. McTiernan
      • Mother sued donor for child support
        • Donor’s defense: contractual waiver
      • Trial court granted child support
      • Superior Court affirmed
        • Cannot bargain away a child’s right to support
      • Supreme Court vacated and remanded
    10. Ferguson v. McTiernan
      • Supreme Court upheld the contract, including Mother’s waiver of support
      • Supreme Court distinguished anonymous clinical donations from sexual conceptions in a relationship or one-time encounter
      • Exception to the rule that a parent cannot bargain away a child’s right to support
    11. Celebrity Divorce Update
      • Christie Brinkley v. Peter Cook
    12. J.F. v. D.B. , 941 A.2d 718 (Pa.Super. 2008)
      • The Brady Bunch: 2008
    13. J.F. v. D.B. Father Triplet 1 Surrogate Father’s Girlfriend Surrogate’s Husband Egg Donor Triplet 2 Triplet 3
    14. Kotzbauer v. Kotzbauer , 937 A.2d 487 (Pa.Super. 2007)
      • aka “The Deer Hunter”
    15. Kotzbauer v. Kotzbauer
      • Epileptic: seizure disorder, migraines, memory loss
      • Full time student, part time job
      • Driving, deer hunting, dancing
      • No medical testimony
    16. Sirio v. Sirio 2008 Pa.Super.133 (2008)
      • What are “reasonable needs”?
    17. Sirio v. Sirio
      • Equally shared physical custody
      • Combined income of $20,538/month
      • Mother had no left-over income
      • Father ordered to pay 100% of children’s reasonable needs in Mother’s care
      • Held: historical expenditures are not necessarily reasonable needs
    18. Krebs v. Krebs , 944 A.2d 487 (Pa.Super. 2008)
      • Retroactive Modification of Child Support
    19. Krebs v. Krebs
      • 2001: Father’s income increased
      • 2004: Mother eligible for 3 year review
      • Trial court granted modification retroactive to 2004 but not 2001
      • Superior Court: Mother entitled to receive modification back to 2001
    20. Faust v. Walker , 945 A.2d 212 (Pa.Super. 2008)
      • Personal Injury proceeds
    21. Faust v. Walker
      • (a) General rule.-- Overdue support shall be a lien by operation of law against the net proceeds of any monetary award, as defined in subsection (i) ....
      • (i) Definitions.--
      • "Net proceeds." Moneys in excess of $5,000 payable to a prevailing party or beneficiary . . . after payment of attorney fees, witness fees, court costs, reasonable litigation expenses, documented unpaid expenses incurred for medical treatment causally related to the claim ....
    22. Celebrity Divorce Update
      • Governor Sarah Palin
    23. Wieland v. Wieland , 2008 Pa.Super. 98 (Pa.Super. 2008) Mother Child Husband Putative Father/ Intervenor
    24. Style v. Shaub, 2008 WL 3272049 (Pa.Super. 2008)
      • Liability for Support of Disabled Adult Child
    25. Colonna v. Colonna, No. 609 WDA 2007 (January 3, 2008)
      • Child Support for Noncustodial Parent
    26. Colonna v. Colonna
      • On remand, trial court awarded support to Mother
      • One-half of the difference between her monthly housing expense and 25% of her net monthly income
      • Superior Court vacated and remanded
      • Mother did not meet her burden of proof
      • Mother, not Father, had superior housing
    27. Colonna v. Colonna
      • Father argued that 75%-25% disparity in incomes did not mandate support order
      • Superior Court: “significant disparity” does not require a deviation from guidelines
      • Father argued that the deviation for housing expense should end when Mother moved out; Superior Court agreed
    28. Recommendation 91
      • Eliminate Melzer in high-income cases
      • Eliminate Mascaro (high-income APL)
      • Overrule Isralsky (mortgage subsidy)
    29. Recommendation 91
      • Eliminate Melzer in high-income child support cases
        • Extend guidelines chart up to $30,000/month
        • Extrapolate above $30,000
        • Example : $2,756 + 5.6% of net income exceeding $30,000 per month for one child
    30. Recommendation 91
      • Eliminate Mascaro in high-income APL and spousal support cases
        • Needs-based (11 factors, like alimony)
        • Not less than formula if combined incomes were $30,000
        • Not greater than 30% of income differential with dependent children or 40% without
    31. Recommendation 91
      • Overrule Isralsky
        • No mortgage subsidy after the final resolution of the claims in divorce
        • Isralsky granted mortgage subsidy as part of child support where custodial parent remained in the marital residence after divorce
    32. Recommendation 91
      • Involuntary reduction of income – no reduction of support unless willful
      • No earning capacity greater than one full time job
      • No shared custody adjustment, split or divided custody offset, or APL/CS offset in high-income cases
    33.  2008 Brian C. Vertz bvsource.com [email_address]

    + Brian VertzBrian Vertz, 2 years ago

    custom

    523 views, 0 favs, 3 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 523
      • 500 on SlideShare
      • 23 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 14 views on http://www.bvsource.com
    • 8 views on http://bvsource.com
    • 1 views on http://bvertz.wordpress.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 14 views on http://www.bvsource.com
    • 8 views on http://bvsource.com
    • 1 views on http://bvertz.wordpress.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories