Asot

1,096 views
1,037 views

Published on

The Arkansas Standard for Online Teaching is a state wide faculty development initiative.

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,096
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
602
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Asot

  1. 1. ASOT Arkansas Standard[Creative Commons-licensed photoby WikimediaCommons user Darwinek.] for Online Teaching
  2. 2. Bryan Fendley Director of Academic ComputingUniversity of Arkansas at Monticello http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwxW9svQJ4Q
  3. 3. A state wide faculty development initiative [Creative Commons-licensed photo by WikimediaCommons user Darwinek.]
  4. 4. Started with an idea
  5. 5. What if every online instructor met acertain level of competency before teaching online?
  6. 6. A state wide faculty development initiative will require unprecedented collaboration
  7. 7. The goal of ASOT1. To develop a standard competency among online faculty within the state2. To develop consistency among adjuncts3. To develop a cost effective method of training and assuring quality
  8. 8. Benefits• Student retention• Faculty satisfaction• Cost savings• Improved learning outcomes
  9. 9. Everybody wins!
  10. 10. August 2011FIRST MEETING
  11. 11. Summary of Responses fromARBUG and ARDLA Members•It would be better if the certificate was promoted and administered through ARDLA and orARBUG.•Development, promotion, oversight, etc., by ARDLA and/or ARBUG•Determine if it is to be credit or non-credit professional development (if it’s a creditprogram it would have to be approved by ADHE)•MOU/written agreement among the institutions planning to participate by offering coursesand/or enrolling employees in the training•Don’t use “certificate or certification” in the title since it could easily be confused withteacher licensure.
  12. 12. Summary of Responses fromARBUG and ARDLA Members cont.•The program should be rigorous•Some Arkansas state colleges are members of Quality Matters•The training should not be mandated•The training should not be platform specific•Nobody wants to re-invent the wheel•Some schools have in place or are developing their own in house certifications•Make it a K20 certification•Offer the certification as a consortium effort
  13. 13. Summary of Responses fromARBUG and ARDLA Members cont.•Model the certification after Wisconsin-Madison•K12 needs the training as much as higher ed•The more institutions that get involved the bigger the impact•Develop a state-wide consortia agreement with Quality Matters•The group should review the Sloan Consortium•Developing our own initiative in state could save institutions money•Faculty need to also be involved in reviewing and developing the model
  14. 14. October 2011SECOND MEETING
  15. 15. Proposed timeline Year 1Train the trainers by developing a standard of training for trainers within the state
  16. 16. Proposed timeline Year 2Participating campus trainers train their faculty
  17. 17. Steps1. identify standards for training2. determine length of training3. determine commitment necessary from participating organizations4. determine appropriate knowledge transfer method for trainers
  18. 18. Open forum for discussion
  19. 19. ASOT Contact Infofendley@uamont.edu Bryanfendley.com Twitter: @bfend

×