VCA Panorama Issue 6

217 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
217
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

VCA Panorama Issue 6

  1. 1. Panorama January 2013 VOLUME 1, ISSUE 6 Recap of the 2012 American Taxpayer Relief Act The American Taxpayer Relief Act (the “Act”) allows the Bush-era tax rates to sunset after 2012 for individuals with incomes over $400,000 and families with incomes over $450,000; permanently "patches" the alternative minimum tax In this Issue: (AMT); revives many now-expired tax extenders, including the research tax credit and the American Opportunity Tax Credit; and provides for a maximumRecap of the 2012 Ameri-can Taxpayer Relief Act estate tax of 40 percent with a $5 million exclusion. The bill also delays the mandatory across-the-board spending cuts known as sequestration. PresidentPleasant Surprise #1 - Obama signed the bill into law on January 2, 2013.Qualified Dividends The primary impact is that individuals with incomes above the $450,000/ $400,000 thresholds will pay more in taxes in 2013 because of a higher 39.6Pleasant Surprise #2 -AMT Permanently Patched percent income tax rate and a 20 percent maximum capital gains tax. Neverthe- less, all taxpayers will find less in their paychecks in 2013 because of what thePleasant Surprise #3 - Act did not include: the new law effectively raises taxes for all wage earnersEstate Tax (and those self-employed) by not extending the 2012 payroll tax holiday that had reduced OASDI taxes from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent on earned income up to the Social Security wage base ($113,700 for 2013).Not So Pleasant Surprises -Phase Outs/Limitations The Act is nowhere close to the grand bargain as envisioned by the President3.8% Medicare Surtax and many lawmakers after the November elections. Effectively, it is a stop-gapRegulations Released measure to prevent the onus of the expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts from fal- ling on middle income taxpayers. Congress must still address sequestration.What Lies Ahead Congress is likely to revisit tax policy and spending cuts when it tackles the ex- pected increase on the nation’s debt limit in February. Slowly the growth of entitlements, such as through a ‘chained-CPI” is certain to be a controversial topic in upcoming debates.
  2. 2. Pleasant Surprise #1— Additionally, the Act provides for an annual infla- tion adjustment to the exemption amounts for Qualified Dividends years beginning after 2012. Without this action,Many feared that the preferential 15% tax rate on an estimated 60 million taxpayers would havequalified dividends would revert back to the old been subject to AMT for the 2012 tax year.classification as ordinary income, taxable at themarginal rate of the taxpayer which now could be Although a "permanent" AMT patch is welcomedas high as 39.6%. The Act raises the top rate for by many taxpayers, the future of the AMT itselfcapital gains and dividends to 20 percent, up from could be decided later this year or next year ifthe Bush-era maximum 15 percent rate. That top Congress tackles comprehensive tax reform. Therate will apply to the extent that a taxpayers in- AMT could, as some lawmakers have proposed, become exceeds the thresholds set for the 39.6 per- abolished. President Obama previously proposedcent rate ($400,000 for single filers; $450,000 for to replace at least part of the AMT with the so-joint filers and $425,000 for heads of households). called Buffett Rule as a part of comprehensive tax reform. The White House has explained the Buf-However, all other taxpayers will continue to en- fett Rule in general terms as ensuring that taxpay-joy a capital gains and dividends tax at a maxi- ers making over $1 million annually would pay anmum rate of 15 percent. A zero percent rate will effective tax rate of at least 30 percent. In 2012,also continue to apply to capital gains and divi- the Senate rejected the Paying a Fair Share Act,dends to the extent income falls below the top of which would implement the Buffett Rule. It is un-the 15 percent income tax bracket—projected for clear if Democrats will reintroduce the bill or2013 to be $72,500 for joint filers and $36,250 for whether it will be considered within the overallsingles. framework of possible tax reform later in 2013.Qualified dividends for all taxpayers continue to Pleasant Surprise #3—Estate Taxbe taxed at capital gains rates, rather than ordinaryincome tax rates as prior to 2003. Generally, divi- It was widely expected that estate tax rules woulddends received from a domestic corporation or a be easy prey for revenue hounds in the currentqualified foreign corporation, on which the under- “fair share” environment. When the dust settledlying stock is held for at least 61 days within a however, the favorable 2012 estate and gift taxspecified 121-day period, are qualified dividends rules survived, except that the maximum rate forfor purposes of the reduced tax rate. Certain divi- estate, gift and GST tax was increased to 40%.dends do not qualify for the reduced tax rates and Therefore, each individual still has a $5 millionare taxed as ordinary income. Those include (not lifetime exemption for estate, gift and GST taxes.an exhaustive list) dividends paid by credit unions, Many wealthy individuals rushed to make signifi-mutual insurance companies, and farmers coop- cant gifts before the end of 2012 to capture theireratives. $5 million gift exemptions, expecting it to be only a fond, short-lived memory. Procrastinators werePleasant Surprise #2—Amount therefore rewarded as a result of this unexpected turn of events.The Act permanently "patches" the AlternativeMinimum Tax (“AMT”) for 2012 and subsequent Perspectiveyears by increasing the exemption amounts andallowing nonrefundable personal credits to the full Strengthamount of the individual’s regular tax and AMT.
  3. 3. It was also feared that the new rules might impose ▪ $250,000 for unmarried taxpayers; andlimitations to reduce the availability of valuation ▪ $150,000 for married taxpayers filingdiscounts, change the income tax treatment of de- separately.fective grantor trusts, and limit the amount of time Under the phaseout, the total amount of personalthat long term dynastic trusts could escape US es- exemptions that may be claimed by a taxpayer istate taxation. For now, those topics will remain reduced by two percent for each $2,500, or portion thereof (two percent for each $1,250 for marriedthe occasional topic of discussion in Congress, but couples filing separate returns) by which the tax-the traditional estate planning techniques which payers adjusted gross income exceeds the applica-benefit from these areas survived and are still ef- ble threshold level.fective. IntegrityNot so Pleasant Surprises— Phaseouts/Limitations InnovationAnother way to raise revenue other than simplyraising the tax rate is to limit the amount of deduc-tions a taxpayer might otherwise benefit from. CharacterBefore the Bush tax cuts were implemented, therewere two limitations on deductions and exemp-tions that have now returned. 3.8% Medicare Surtax Regulations ReleasedThe Act officially revives the "Pease" limitation onitemized deductions. To refresh your memory,this limitation reduces the total amount of a The Medicare surtax became effective January 1.higher-income taxpayers otherwise allowable While this surtax has been lingering in the shad-itemized deductions by three percent of the amount ows as a loosely defined concept since its passageby which the taxpayers adjusted gross income ex- into law at the end of 2010, the Treasury Depart-ceeds an applicable threshold. However, the ment recently issued proposed reliance regulationsamount of itemized deductions will not be reduced on the operation of the 3.8% Medicare surtax. Theby more than 80 percent. Certain items, such as IRS explained in the preamble to the proposed regsmedical expenses, investment interest, and casu- that one of the general purposes of Code Sec. 1411alty, theft or wagering losses, are excluded. . How- that it tries to fulfill through the proposed relianceever, higher "applicable threshold" levels apply regs is "to impose a tax on unearned income or in-under the new law: vestments of certain individuals, estates, and trusts." Despite the simplicity of this mission ▪ $300,000 for married couples and statement, defining net investment income in the surviving spouses; proposed reliance regs requires the lions share of ▪ $275,000 for heads of households; the 159 pages of the just-released preamble and ▪ $250,000 for unmarried taxpayers; and regs. ▪ $150,000 for married taxpayers filing separately. If your taxable income does not exceed the 2013 threshold ($200,000 for single, $250,000 for jointThe Act also officially revives the personal exemp- returns), you are not subject to this additional in-tion phaseout rules, but at applicable income vestment income tax. If your income exceeds thethreshold levels slightly higher than in the past: threshold, then the 3.8% tax applies to the lesser of i) the amount your income exceeds the threshold, ▪ $300,000 for married couples and or ii) your net investment income. This tax applies surviving spouses; in addition to your regular income tax under 2013 ▪ $275,000 for heads of households; rates.
  4. 4. Leave it to the IRS to make a simple concept of cuts today, not those promised in the futureinvestment income extremely complicated. The as Obama urges, so they give no credit toregs define net investment income as gross income the President’s claimed cuts. So, each sidefrom interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, and will continue to do their own ideologicalrents, other than certain income which is derived math in terms of additional revenues andin the ordinary course of a trade or business, net cuts they are willing to offer to reach theirgain attributable to the disposition of non-trade or respective visions of a balanced solution.business property less deductions properly alloc-able to such gross income or net gain. • Reaching an agreement on sequestrationSounds simple in concept, but keep in mind it took (across-the-board spending cuts) – Recallover 100 pages of regulations to flesh this out. that in the last debt ceiling debate in theBottom line, start evaluating your exposure to this summer of 2011, an agreement wastax early in 2013, as there may be some planning reached to sequester, or reduce all pro-you can do to soften the blow. grams across the board, by $1.2 trillion, as of January 1, 2013. This can was kickedIntegrity down the road until March 1 under the fis- cal cliff deal. Republicans insist on replac- ing each dollar of across the board cuts that Innovation are cancelled with a dollar of spending cuts. President Obama insists on replacing sequestration with a package that includes equal amounts of revenue increases and spending cuts.What Lies Ahead? • Raising the debt limit – Speaker Boehner intends to hold firm against raising the debtWhatever relief that American taxpayers feel from limit unless the legislation to do so is ac-the new legislation will only be temporary. The companied by significant spending cuts.fiscal cliff negotiations appeared to offer a unique The “Boehner Rule” is that the debt ceilingopportunity to achieve the “grand bargain” that we can only be raised one dollar for each dol-all hoped for. Unfortunately, politics got the best lar in spending cuts. Hitting the debt ceil-of the negotiations, and what we got falls terribly ing will not result in the U.S. defaulting onshort of solving the bigger problem of deficit re- its debt obligations, as there will continueduction. to be sufficient revenues to service the na- tional debt. What will default are someOver the next two months, there are three signifi- Government services or programs that thecant challenges which must be addressed by Con- existing tax revenues cannot cover.gress and the President. Whether the ceiling is raised or not, ratings agencies have indicated they may move to • Reaching common ground on deficit re- lower the U.S. Government debt rating for duction – Republicans, the Democrats, and a second time in history. You can count on the President all claim to want balanced fear mongering by the two factions to urge deficit reduction, but no one can agree on constituents to support their respective how to get there. President Obama wants views. credit for approximately $1.5 trillion in The post-election wrangling over the fiscal cliff non-entitlement spending reductions over was just a warm up for the real show, which is the the next decade that came out of the 2011 debt ceiling. Here, the Republicans believe they Budget Control Act. Republicans argue have the leverage to make significant changes they that they have produced $600 billion in desire to spending and address economic growth. revenue increases as a result of the fiscal Whatever the outcome, Americans are likely to be cliff deal. Republicans insist on budget even more frustrated with this exercise than with the fiscal cliff negotiations.
  5. 5. View Capital Advisors, LLC was founded in 2004 by its principals with the mission of providing sophisticated Contributing to this issue: investment asset management and financial and estate planning to our U.S. and Non-U.S. clients. R. Craig Brubaker I. Michael Goodrich We seek to bring wealth planning best practices and a wide range of non-proprietary solutions to our clients. We also conduct our own research and diligence on 2000 McKinney Avenue, Suite 600 world markets and investment alternatives. Dallas, TX 75201 For further information, please contact your investment 214-855-2550 representative or one of our wealth planning specialists: www.view-cap.com R. Craig Brubaker 214-855-2556 cbrubaker@view-cap.com I. Michael Goodrich 214-855-2552 mgoodrich@view-cap.comTo ensure compliance with requirements imposed by U.S. Treasury Regulations, View Capital Advisors, LLC, and its affiliates,informs you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication was not intended or written to be used, and cannot beused, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommendingto another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.View Capital Advisors, LLC provides asset allocation and investment advisory services through its affiliated registered invest-ment advisor, View Capital RIA, LP and provides trade execution services through its affiliate, VCA Securities, LP.

×