No community intentionally embarks on a path to being just an “OK” place. But many communities are beginning to realize that redevelopment built under the guise of Smart Growth, results in little more than infill McMansions, high, density, townhouse clusters and strip mall makeovers. This type of development may look different but it falls short of building upon the visual character that makes a community unique.
Coming out of the recent economic recession communities everywhere are facing a new planning paradigm – sprawl is not sustainable. Changing demographics, a new interest in public health, environmental concerns and a desire for energy efficiency are topics influencing the planning conversation as more and more communities adopt principles to promote smart growth to guide infill and redevelopment.
The issue is that redevelopment built under the banner of smart growth often reflects the latest in design-build construction with no regard for existing building form, architectural style or materials. This pattern book approach of smart growth may be “compatible” with surrounding development but robs a community of the character that makes it a great place.
This presentation was put together for planners who are interested in developing design guidelines or updating existing guidelines that will ensure smart growth reflects the distinctive and unique character of their community … making it a great place.
The presentation will identify:
1. The legal framework at the federal and local level that gives communities the authority to regulate aesthetics, character and materials;
2. The policy and regulatory tools available at the community level for implementing character;
3. The process for engaging the public to define the character that will make their community a great place.
Community Planning - Making it or Faking it? Design Guidelines for Smarter Growth
1. MAKING OR FAKING GREAT PLACESDesign Guidelines for Smarter Growth
2. Brick Industry Association BIA
The Brick Industry Association is a non-
profit trade association that represents
manufacturers and distributors of kiln fired,
clay brick.
BIA is the nationally recognized authority
on clay brick construction and represents the
industry in all model building code forums
and national standards committees.
3. BIA Community Planning Program
BIA’s community planners provide a variety
of services (at no cost) to local government
agencies including assisting with drafting
design guidelines for new development.
As a part of BIA’s outreach, our community
planners provide on-site presentations,
consultations and information on best
practices for including clay brick in zoning
ordinances and design standards.
www.gobrick.com
4. Logging CM Credits
• planning.org/cm
• Go to your Dashboard
• Select Activities by Provider
• Select Brick Industry Association (BIA) or event #27433
• Select “Design Guidelines for Smarter Growth”
• Approved for 1 CM credit
5. Contributor
Shannon Armstrong
Shannon has been a Community Planner for BIA
for more than six years. She educates urban
planners and elected officials in the Midwest on
the benefits that clay brick has for communities.
Shannon has more than 13 years experience
working with local government agencies, and she
also speaks at local conferences throughout the
year on topics such as resiliency and
sustainability. Shannon has a masters degree in
Urban Planning and Public Policy specializing in
economic development from the University of
Illinois in Chicago.
6. Contributor
Aaron Steele, AICP
Aaron Steele has worked in the brick industry
since 2005, first as a Community Planner and
currently as Executive Director of the Heartland
Region. He leads the region’s education and
promotion efforts, including its program of
community planning outreach. Aaron has worked
for and with local governments as a planner since
1997 and has been a member of the American
Institute of Certified Planners since 2002. He
holds a B.S. degree in Community and Regional
Planning and an MBA, both from Iowa State
University, and he serves on the Story County
(Iowa) Planning and Zoning Commission.
7. Contributors
Ann Stanley, AICP
Ann Stanley, is a planner with over 14 years
experience in the public and private sectors. She
has a multidisciplinary background that includes
historic preservation, hazard planning and public
outreach. She is a consultant to BIA working in
the Washington/Baltimore region and with
communities in New York and New Jersey
recovering from Superstorm Sandy. A member of
the American Institute of Certified Planners since
2003, Ann has held appointments with the Toronto
Heritage Board and the Land Reutilization
Authority for the City of St. Louis. She has a B.A.
in Fine Arts from Indiana University and studied
urban planning at Ball State University.
11. It look like block after block
of the same cluster with
minor variations?
Does …
Making or Faking
12. The “character” of the
grey field development
in your community defined
by franchise architecture
and parking dominated
commercial strips?
Is …
Making or Faking
13. Proposals for new retail
have the same off-the-shelf
look as every other new
development?
Do …
Making or Faking
17. Smart Growth
• Mix Land Uses
• Take Advantage of Compact Building Design
• Create a Range of Housing Opportunities and
Choices
• Create Walkable Neighborhoods
• Foster Distinctive, Attractive Communities with
a Strong Sense of Place
• Preserve Open Space, Farmland, Natural Beauty
and Critical Environmental Areas
• Strengthen and Direct Development Towards
Existing Communities
• Provide a Variety of Transportation Choices
• Make Development Decisions Predictable, Fair
and Cost Effective
• Encourage Community and Stakeholder
Collaboration in Development Decisions
The Smart Growth Network
18. Making or Faking
“A sense of place results when
design and development protect
and incorporate the distinctive character
of a community and its unique context,
whether urban or rural..”
Smart Growth
American Planning Association
21. PART I
Identify the Regulatory Framework for Character
PART II
Identify the Tools to Implement Character
PART III
Identify the Character Your Community Wants
23. IdentifyingtheRegulatoryFrameworkforCharacter
PART I
“The concept of the public
welfare is broad and inclusive . . .
The values it represents are
spiritual as well as physical;
aesthetic as well as monetary. It is
within the power of the
legislature to determine that the
community should be beautiful as
well as healthy, spacious as well
as clean, well balanced as well as
carefully patrolled.”
Legislating Aesthetics
fsa8b15291http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/fsa.8b15291
Berman v. Parker (348 U.S. 26; 99 L. ed. 27)
24. IdentifyingtheRegulatoryFrameworkforCharacter
PART I
“The concept of the public
welfare is broad and inclusive . . .
The values it represents are
spiritual as well as physical;
aesthetic as well as monetary. It is
within the power of the
legislature to determine that the
community should be beautiful as
well as healthy, spacious as well
as clean, well balanced as well as
carefully patrolled.”
Legislating Aesthetics
Berman v. Parker (348 U.S. 26; 99 L. ed. 27)
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/service/pnp/ppmsca/31700/31775v.jpg
25. IdentifyingtheRegulatoryFrameworkforCharacter
PART I
“We emphasize what is not in
dispute … This court has
recognized in a number of
settings, that states and cities may
enact land use regulations or
controls to enhance the quality of
life by preserving the character
and the desirable features of a
city …”
Penn Central Transportation Co v City of New
York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978)
Legislating Aesthetics
cph3c13343http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/cph.3c13343
27. IdentifyingtheRegulatoryFrameworkforCharacter
PART I
“Attractive surroundings always
give a greater consciousness of
the better things in a community
and … through that very
attractiveness increase the
comfort and welfare of the
people.”
Kansas City v Liebi, 252 S.W. 404 (1923
Legislating Aesthetics
http://www.ralonghistoricalsociety.org/newslets/scartpt.htm
28. IdentifyingtheRegulatoryFrameworkforCharacter
PART I
“It defies common sense to
require the Planning Board to
consider building design in a
vacuum. Building design can
only be evaluated effectively in
the context of the environment in
which the buildings will
ultimately exist.” (Duerksen
1991)
Coscan Washington v. The Maryland National Capital Park
and Planning Commission, 590 A. 2d 602 (1991)
Legislating Aesthetics
33. IdentifyingtheRegulatoryFrameworkforCharacter
PART I
“… the corporate authorities in
each municipality have the
following powers: …(12) to
establish local standards solely
for the review of the exterior
design of buildings and
structures, …”
(65 ILCS 5/) Illinois Municipal Code. (65 ILCS 5/Art. 11 Div. 13
heading) DIVISION 13. ZONING
Planning Framework
46. IdentifyingtheCharacterYourCommunityWants
PART III
• Public Engagement
• Define Terminology
• Identify Boundaries
• Identify the Intent
• Assess Character
• Scenario Analysis
• Develop Guidelines
Developing Design Guidelines for Character
108. References
• Adams, Bill (April 16, 2013) “10 Rules for Smarter Smart Growth.” Retrieved on: April 10, 2014 from
www.sandiego.urbdezine.com/2013/04/16/10-rules-for-smarter-smart-growth/
• American Planning Association (April 14, 2012) “Policy Guide on Smart Growth.” Retrieved on: April 2,
2014 from www.planning.org/policy/guides/adopted/smartgrowth.htm
• Borys, Hazel and Talen, Emily (May 16, 2013) “Ways to Fail at Form-Based Codes 04: Don’t Capture the
Character”. Retrieved on: April 25, 2014 from, www.placemakers.com/2013/05/16/ways-to-fail-at-form-
based-codes-04/
• Bruno, Martin, FAICP. (2006) “Creating a Long-Lasting Community One Brick at a Time.” Retrieved on:
April, 10, 2014 from www.planning.org/practicingplanner/2006/win/supertopicfeature1.htm
• Chang, Nicholas (September 19, 2012) “Local Planning for Global Competitiveness in Carmel, IN”
Retrieved on June 2, 2014 from http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/2012/09/19/smart-growth-stories-
local-planning-for-global-competitiveness-in-carmel-in/
• Duerksen, Christopher J. Esq. (Nov.-Dec. 1992) “Zoning for Aesthetics.” Planning Commissioners Journal
7, pp. 9-11
109. References
• Goers, Randy. (August, 29, 2012) “InVision Tampa, People, Place, Progress; Central City Master Plan” Retrieved on June 2,
2012 from
http://search.ncat.org/texis/search/?dropXSL=&pr=SGN2010&prox=page&rorder=500&rprox=500&rdfreq=500&rwfreq=500
&rlead=500&sufs=0&query=street+transformation&x=-1027&y=-70
• Gough, Megan Zimmerman, Puentes, Robert, Richardson, Jesse J..Jr. (January 2003) “Is Home Rule The Answer? Clarifying
The Influence Of Dillon's Rule On Growth Management.” Retrieved on April 26, 2014 from:
/www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2003/01/01metropolitanpolicy-richardson
• Hammel, Douglas, AICP. (March 2011) “Practice Design Guidelines.” Zoning Practice, American Planning Association 3
• Illinois General Assembly. (May 11, 2013) (65 ILCS 5/11-13-1) (from Ch. 24, par. 11-13-1) Retrieved on June 16, 2014 from:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=006500050K11-13-1
• Smart Growth Network “Smart Growth Principles.” Retrieved on: April 2, 2014 from, www.smartgrowth.org/network.php
BIA Publications:
• Brick Industry Association. “Masonry Ordinance Case Study, Fall Church, Virginia.”
www.gobrick.com/Portals/25/docs/Urban%20Planning/VA_FallsChurch_CaseStudy.pdf
• Brick Industry Association. “Masonry Ordinance Case Study, Carmel, Indiana.”
www.gobrick.com/Portals/25/docs/Urban%20Planning/IN_Carmel_CaseStudy.pdf
110. BIA Professional Outreach
BIA offers a variety of services to engineers,
architects, builders, planners and consumers
including national awards competitions,
educational seminars and numerous other
programs.
Provides educational services and seminars to:
Engineers,
Architects,
Planners
Publications include:
Builder Notes
Tech Notes
Brick in Architecture