Segmentation Divides Markets into Addressable Chunks
Segmentation separates potential customers into groups according to different buying criteria
Mobile Knowledge does not address all possible uses of GPS
They focus on managing taxicab resources
Cadence did not address all possible uses of high-end graphic design
They focus on semi-conductor design tools
Corel tried to address everybody when they bought WordPerfect
They failed.
Target Segment is The Chunk That You Can Dominate
A startup has a much better chance of success if it focuses on a single, unserved segment that they can dominate fast
The target segment is the one that gives you the best chance to dominate
Corel built success on delivering easy-to-use graphics tools to the home-user segment
MOSAID built success by designing custom semi chips for the home electronics manufacturer segment
DELL built success by selling computers to the price-sensitive and convenience-sensitive home/home business market
These were unserved or underserved segments before
Of all the possible segments that were available, these came out on top after analysis of qualifying criteria
Choosing a Target Segment is Critical to Success
In general, studies show that between 70% and 90% of all high-tech startups will fail in the first two years
Most startup technologies and products fail as a result of poor segmentation and targeting practices
Good Knowledge of the Market and Single-Minded Focus are the Number One Reasons for Startup Success
Ready, Fire, Aim Doesn’t Work
Most common start-up error is to attack a number of segments to see which will work best
No “whole product” is ever delivered to one market
Resources are distributed among too many segments and sales, marketing, development is done poorly
No segment can be dominated fast
Defenses are weak and competitors can breach the segment walls easily
Early adopters/innovators do not mirror the thinking of pragmatists
Beachhead Approach Secures Dominant Segment Position
Focus limited resources to establish leadership in a single segment
Gives strategic sales direction even in the very early market
Leadership in a single segment helps build credibility with
Analysts and media
Financiers
Hard-core pragmatists
Employees
Board
High tech buyers prefer to buy from segment leaders
Reduces the risk of failure – go find another beach
Much better chance of being first in the “mind”
Moore’s Chasm Model Illustrates Startup Challenge Early Adopters Chasm Pragmatists on Main Street Beachhead Bowling Alley Early Majority Late Majority Laggards Tornado Applies to product categories, NOT to companies Each stage requires a different approach to segmentation
Seven Steps to Successful Segmentation for Startups
Step 1: Determine where you really are within the startup life cycle.
Step 2: Regardless of Step 1, create as broad a definition of an addressable market as possible and then break it down in to all possible sub-segments
Step 3: Create customers profiles for all remaining sub-segments
Step 4: Assess profiles again critical flaws criteria and eliminate those that fail
Step 5: Assess remaining profiles against selection variables continuously until top segment remains
Step 6: Test target segment against SWOT and performance goals
Step 7: If no segment apparent, repeat process
Step 1: Find Where You Are Relative to the Chasm to Determine Segment Strategy Chasm Atomized Segmentation for Innovators Concentrated Segmentation for Beachhead Differentiated Segmentation for Bowling Alley
New technology with first product still in development or at early Release 1.0 stage
Angel, seed or small first round financial situation
No customers or small set distributed widely across different vertical or horizontal markets
Sales are growing
Buyers are technology people within customer organizations
Product “story” revolves around the “coolness” of the technology
Sales-led with no marketing communications effort
Characteristics of the Chasm
Sales growth has slowed
Starting to see some competition perhaps
Sales asking for constant product changes to close deals
Prospective customers fail to understand the product’s “technology” story
Additional early adopter buyers are not coalescing around any particular vertical or horizontal market
Additional financing is often proving difficult to obtain
Often many partners and resellers signed up but little or no results
Product management struggling to identify product roadmap and technology roadmap
Step 2: Define the Total Addressable Market and Then Narrow Down
Brainstorm the possible broad applications for your technology
Build hierarchies for each one until you have multiple “application trees”
Vertical waterfalls
Cross-horizontal segments – vertical cuts on horizontal technologies
Suppliers and channels
Think in terms of the buyer, NOT the organization
Layer reasonably but go at least four deep if possible
Some technologies will have many applications: others will have a more limited application scope
Good Segmentation Narrows the Focus and Leverages Resources Anyone Who Needs to Locate Anything that Moves and that is Big Enough to Carry a Receiver and That is Outside for Any Length of Time GPS Segmentation Example Vehicles People Animals Cargo Icebergs Trailers Planes Cars Rail Cars Earth Movers Ships Livestock PressTank Tankers Dry Cargo Reefers Container Freezer Refridge High Perish Low Perish Flowers Produce Meat Indies Carriers Corporates
Topics
Segment the Market
Create Segment Profiles
Identify Critical Flaws
Assess Variables
Select Target Segment
Create Segment Profiles
Upon completion
You will know about
Using customer profiles to understand segments
You will know how
To create a profile of a typical customer in a segment
To determine the customer’s pain point
To create a before/after picture of the customer’s pain after adopting your solution
To focus on the customer as an individual rather than as a company
To determine the potential value of your solution to the customer and the segment
To group segments into related segments
You Can’t Really Know What the Beach Looks Like Till You Get There
Beachheads have no ‘hard data’
Company has little or no experience with the beachhead target segment
No similar products are serving that segment
No credibility with which to gain information directly from pragmatists in segment
Innovators/early adopters are different from pragmatists and cannot be used as models
High-level market size projections are generally untrustworthy and erroneous
Step 3: Create Multiple Target Customer Profiles
In most startups, the product is looking for a target segment
Usually begun with a technology bias
Were this not true, far fewer startups would fail
With little useful and specific market data available, turn to building a profile of the potential customer
“informed intuition” rather than “analytical reason”
Be wide and ranging in your approach
Current early adopters, lost deals, profiles in related categories, your own experience, ask friends and family for ideas, brainstorm
Define the Prospect’s Current Problem with These Questions
What problem causes the pain or frustration? Sketch a scenario in which the customer attempts a task and feels pain as a result.
How does the customer try to cope with the problem now?
What is causing the problem? What is interfering with a speedy solution? What goes wrong and why?
How much money is the customer losing, either in additional costs or lost revenue? Quantify the pain.
Who is the individual who feels the pain first and how does it “waterfall” up or down?
Who else feels the pain? The customer’s customers? Suppliers? Partners? Investors?
Profile Example – Pain Scenario Frustration Point Costs Current Solution Stakeholders Cause Pain Solution Fleet mgrs misplace 5% of loaded produce reefers due to admin and driver problems Avg. value of lost or spoiled cargo is $250K -- $12 million total for avg carrier + high ins. rate Insurance pays 75% of value and rest is written off as tax loss Produce distributors; supermarket owners; truck drivers; insurance company; carriers Many trailers being managed at once: Inadequate admin techniques; careless reporting by drivers; late loads Characteristic
Align Your Product to Their Problems With These Questions
Define the customer’s changed situation
How does the customer approach the task differently?
Is the pain removed or is it lessened. For whom?
Are new problems introduced as a result of your solution?
Is your solution better than any other way the customer had of solving the problem? Why?
How does your solution remove the pain?
How much money will the customer gain as result of your solution, either as cost savings or increased revenues?
Can you determine a time frame for payback?
Profile Example – Solution Scenario Frustration point Costs Stakeholders Cause Pain Solution Fleet mgrs misplace 5% of loaded produce reefers due to admin and driver problems every year Avg. value of lost or spoiled cargo is $250K -- $12 million total for avg carrier + high ins. rate Insurance pays 75% of value and rest is written off as tax loss Produce distributors; supermarket owners; truck drivers; insurance company; carriers Many trailers being managed at once: Inadequate admin techniques; careless reporting by drivers; late loads By using GPS, fleet mgrs can locate trailers before cargo spoils Cost for avg carrier including services is $3 million, providing customer payback in one quarter and savings of $10.5 M/yr Problem is solved easily Current solution Distributors incented to use GPS-able carriers; driver morale improves; insurance easier and cheaper to get; insurance push? Root causes difficult to eradicate cause based on human error: GPS-enabling solves problem faster and cheaper than changing behaviours Characteristic
Create Groups According to Similarities
Be creative and open in building profiles
BUT
Unless you have unlimited time and money, rationalize all the profiles into segment groups
Out of 50 or so profiles, about 10 segments will likely coalesce
Look for key similarities
Vertical markets
Common problems and pain points
Similar economic impacts
Similar groups of users
Topics
Segment the Market
Create Segment Profiles
Identify Critical Flaws
Assess Variables
Select Target Segment
Identify Critical Flaws
Upon completion
You will know about
What the binary criteria are for success in a segment
You will know how
To assess segment customer profiles against each criteria
To eliminate immediately segments in which you stand little chance of success
Step 4: Assess Profiles Against Critical Flaws
Assess each profile against 5 key criteria that can “make or break” your chance of succeeding in that segment
Ask and answer a series of questions and rate the answers on a binary scale of yes or no. Include a sentence or two on why.
Eliminate any that fail and set aside all related segments
Do They Have a Reason to Buy?
You may think it’s great, but will the customer?
Is the financial impact of the problem severe enough to drive the need of a solution
There are lots of problems that pragmatists will live with rather than take a risk that could have worse consequences
Of all possible ways of solving the problem, is yours the obvious choice from the point of view of
Total cost – including “whole product,” installation, services, training and adoption costs
Speed to implement
Ease of use and adoption
Maintenance and support
Stability of technology and company
What Do They Actually Need to Buy to Solve the Problem?
Is it practical to deliver the “whole product”?
Do you have the right partners to deliver the “whole” product?
How well established are those partnerships?
Can you establish the right partners and be productive with them in the time frame needed to enter and dominate that segment early and fast?
Who do you need to partner with and is it reasonable to assume that they will come on board with you?
Who Else Can They Buy From?
Has someone else beat you to the beachhead?
If yes, reconsider or develop a second-entry strategy
Are there barriers to entry that protect you in that segment for sufficient time?
Are there players in related product categories that can move into your space quickly?
Is there potential confusion among categories within similar segments?
Is the segment characterized by a “single vendor” approach?
Can They Buy?
Does the segment have a ‘target customer’ who has buying power?
Is there a single person who feels the most pain?
Is that pain tied to revenue loss or additional costs?
Does the buyer have a budget for the “whole” product?
Is the financial pain felt by someone with buying authority?
Trying to fix bad segmentation with smart selling doesn’t work
Lots of effort spent identifying and winning sponsors and champions
Endlessly long sales cycle
Uncommitted budgets
Uncommitted management ready to cut projects on a whim
Binary Answers to Critical Flaw Criteria Criteria Yes No Reason Segment: Produce Reefer Location for Carrier Companies Compelling reason to buy √ 5% of trailers misplaced, 3% stolen Carrier liable for both, loss per avg. $275K/yr; customers punish carriers with high loss Deliver whole product √ Make entire receiver; partnership with mounting and antenn partners; have installation partners Buyer with economic power √ Risk managers and CFO feel greatest financial pain; drivers docked for misplacement No competition Cell-based communications services provide GPS within acceptable margin of error where service available √
Topics
Segment the Market
Create Segment Profiles
Identify Critical Flaws
Assess Variables
Select Target Segment
Assess Variables
Upon completion,
You will know about
What assessment variables are important to selecting a target segment beachhead
How each of those variables can affect your success
You will know how
To rate each customer segment profile against the assessment variables
To determine your ability to overcome shortcomings or change your ability to satisfy the requirement
At What Price Will They Buy At?
Can you deliver the “whole product” at a price that is consistent with the segment’s budgets?
Is the price commensurate with the customer’s financial loss?
Is there enough margin in the price to ensure all levels in the channel are adequately compensated?
Can you deliver the “whole product” at a price that will win share rapidly without going under?
How Are They Going to Buy?
Do you have the right sales channel to reach that segment?
If not, can you establish timely relationships with the right channel partners/
Do you have any expertise with the segment or the dominant vertical in the segment?
Do you have or can you obtain someone with the right rolodex to take you into the segment quickly?
Can you compensate everyone in the channel sufficiently to keep their interest and loyalty?
Why Should They Buy From You?
Is the segment reachable?
Is there a set of communication vehicles that can reach them?
Do you have the resources to market adequately?
Will the channel participate in tactical marketing?
Do you have any credibility with this segment?
Can you deliver a “whole product” and can you commit to it?
Can you build credibility fast enough to hold back bigger players in associated product categories?
Can you talk their talk?
Is the Segment Small Enough?
Large segments are usually heavy with competition
Choose a segment that is small enough for you to penetrate to a critical mass and dominate
This means capturing 50% of market share measured as dollars and units
Can you capture 50% with the resources available to you?
Can you service 50% without burning out?
Choose a segment that is large enough to meet your revenue projections
If 50% of the segment won’t meet forecast, dump it
Will the Segment Survive?
Is the segment at risk for its own survival?
Are there signals that the segment is failing in terms of
Product category adoption rates growing or failing
Financial stability
Competitive saturation
Can you estimate the remaining lifespan of the segment?
Does the segment exhibit innovation characteristics or is it know for technological conservatism?
Can You Identify Lead Customers?
Does the segment have identified buyers who have a history of innovation and early adoption?
Have they deployed their early buys or kept them in the lab?
Do they have the support of their organizations?
Have they a history of championing early technologies publicly?
Is there one or two organizations that feel the pain more acutely?
Will they participate in the design, development, test process?
Are they open to an over-time payment model?
Do they have credibility among potential investors?
Are There Adjacent Segments That You Can Jump To?
Beachhead segment is the “head pin” in the bowling alley
What close segments are a natural segue? Refer back to the application trees.
Are they likely to still be available?
At what point can you begin to attack the next segment?
Are there enough close segments to achieve breakeven and profitability over time?
Step 5: Rate Remaining Segments According to Variables
Rank each variable on a scale of one to five
Rank all segments and eliminate weakest 50%
Use totals as an overall indication
Weight variables according to your flexibility or ability to change your situation
e.g. software has much more flexibility on pricing
e.g. no existing channels but ability to establish the right partnerships
e.g. offered technology will increase segment stability
Repeat ranking exercise until top one or two segments revealed
Ranking Example Segment: Produce Reefer Location for Carrier Companies Criteria Rank Weight Reason 2 Channels Price Final Segment Size Innovators 5 4 No established price, dev is capitalized, direct sales, 90% software margin, 1 year runway 4 3 4 Preferred direct model, upfront cost high, greater risk, no proliferation, total control 3 2 3 2 4 3 Segment size large to achieve 50% penetration and domination; no ability to change; potential to narrow segment Trucking industry conservative; satellite technology accepted; 2 known innovative risk managers Totals 11 14 14
Topics
Segment the Market
Create Segment Profiles
Identify Critical Flaws
Assess Variables
Select Target Segment
Select a Target Segment
Upon completion,
You will know about
The final four tests before selecting a beachhead
The importance of a SWOT analysis
The importance of a financial goal
The importance of performance goals
The importance of assessing risk of failure
You will know how
To apply a SWOT analysis to the target segment
To establish performance goals
Step 6: Rate Final Segment Against Final Criteria – Can You Win It?
Undergo a SWOT exercise in relation to segment
Involve all internal stakeholders and decision makers
Rate chances of success against corporate weaknesses and strengths
Assess segment honestly against core competencies
Technology bias
Marketing ability
R&D ability
Build one and two year financial models to assess revenue potential, profitability, share, growth
Can you live with the risk of failure
What is the cost of failure?
Can the company survive?
Establish Performance Goals
Set in quantifiable measures
Define the performance dimension e.g. absolute share, increase in share, revenue
Define the index – units, dollars, percentage
Target – 50% share, $1 million in revenue, breakeven
Time – within a year, a quarter, a month
Ensure that goals are compatible and not mutually exclusive
High share goals do not live with high profitability
High revenue goals do not live with short time frames
Taking competitor’s share does not live with increased penetration
And the Winner Is!!
Critical that everyone buys in
Deal with subversion early and quickly
Promote a “disagree and commit” philosophy
Establish short-term tactical goals to ensure meeting overall product performance and corporate goals
Begin planning for the next segment as you attack the beachhead
Understand sooner rather than later your next steps should you win
And should you lose
Speed is critical to keep competition at bay and win mindshare and real share
Technical Entrepreneurship “Positioning to Win ” Corien Kershey
Topics
Find your positioning platform
Create a positioning statement
Establish a branding platform
Slide
Find Your Positioning Platform
Upon completion,
You will know about
What positioning is
Why positioning is critical to your success
The six rules of positioning
The seven steps to successful positioning
You will know how to
Determine the important attributes to your customers
Map your ability to “own” an attribute and defend it
Select one or two key attributes on which to build a positioning and branding program
Slide
Brand is a Contract and Guarantee
Position is the single attribute that your customers will identify you and your products by
Brand is the psychological contract between you and the buyer that you will always deliver the expected attribute in return for the expected price.
Position Locates Your Product in the Customer’s Mind
Marketing is a battle of perceptions, not products
What the customer thinks is the only reality that matters
Superior technology alone will not win
Positioning determines how your customers perceive you in relation to your competitors
Good positioning focuses on one key attribute that is important to your target segment
Think of positioning as placing your product on a two-dimensional plan in relation to your competitors
Positioning is Placing Yourself in the Customers’ Mind Mercedes + Lincoln + Cadillac + Volvo + Porsche + Lexus + Nissan + Honda + Acura + BMW + Saab + Toyota + Chevrolet + Dodge + Ford + Plymouth + Hyundai + Chrysler + Buick + Sporty Conservative Low Cost Affordable Expensive High End
Branding is the Consistent Expression of Your Position
Branding is NOT just colours, logos and taglines
Good branding is ensuring that everything that the customer experiences about your product is consistent with the position
Price
Quality
Delivery system and sales approach
Advertising and marcomm messaging
Customer service
Product functionality and specifications
Good branding also creates a look for your product that is immediately identifiable and immediately evokes the position (values and attributes) that you claim
Brand Equity is Your Most Valuable Asset
Brand equity builds brand loyalty
Builds profitable repeat customers
Protects market share
Protects profit margins
Directs innovation and technology/product direction
Provides a definable market that can be addressed with given resources
Makes it easier to measure yourself against competitors
More defendable than most IP
Well-defended positions are difficult to steal
For most companies, owning a clear and defendable market through a clear position is more valuable and attainable than patent protection – patents don’t force people to buy
Nine Rules Govern Positioning and Branding
You MUST be able to deliver the promised position
Be the first in the mind with your attribute in your product category
You cannot claim an attribute that another product owns
Do not claim an attribute that is not important to your customers
Only claim an attribute that you can competitively defend
You must always defend your position and your attribute
You can only position relative to your competitors
Communicate your position through consistent branding
Good positioning is a long-term commitment and requires inflexibility
Eight Step Process to Establish Position and Brand
Step 1: Identify the target segment
Step 2: List all the critical attributes important to the target
segment
Step 3: Establish and map your ability and those of your competitors to deliver those attributes
Step 4: Identify and map your competitor’s ability to deliver and to attack your advantage
Step 5: Create three positioning statements
Step 6: Select the position that provides the greatest focus
Step 7: Select an execution approach based on six techniques
A startup has a much better chance of success if it focuses on a single, unserved segment that they can dominate fast
The right target segment is the one that gives you the best chance to dominate given available resources
The right target segment delivers clear customer wants and needs
Step 2: Define the Prospect’s Important Needs – Do Research
What is the target customer’s main problem?
What are the two or three most important benefits that the target customer will seek from your solution?
How much money is the customer losing, either in additional costs or lost revenue? Quantify the pain
How important is cost relative to all other attributes?
How much of the prospect’s personal reputation and feelings are tied up in the problem and its solution?
Are you solving a problem that is on their priority list?
Step 3: Establish Ability to Satisfy Attributes – Can You Walk the Talk?
Examine your own ability to satisfy various key attributes.
Price vs. quality/functionality
Ability to innovate quickly
Customer service provisioning
Distribution and delivery systems
Choice and selection
Outreach capabilities
Current position or brand identity
Determine what attributes you have strong capabilities in
Determine your strength in the key attributes that you identified within the target segment
Step 4: Understand the Position that Your Competitors Occupy
You have competitors. If you think you don’t, you’re not thinking broadly enough
Competitors can come from any quarter
Suppliers
Home Depot is fighting Black and Decker’s decision to sell directly on the Internet
Franchisees
Sealy was taken over by an alliance of powerful licensees
Distributors
Pubs who run microbreweries compete directly with the big brands that they distribute
Big brand foods must compete directly with their distributor’s label, President’s Choice
Customers
IBM was Microsoft’s major customer. ‘nuff said. Works both ways!
Apathy
The problem you’re solving is not on my top 100-list so come back in 5 years
It’s Not About Where to Compete: It’s About HOW to Compete
Phenomenon occurs in companies and industries called isomorphism in which competitors execute the same strategies at the same time
All roll out the same products at the same time
All use the same type of messages and focus on the same attributes
No one is first in the mind, no one promotes the product category
The market is confused and locked in fear
Map competitors in their relative positions to
Look for gaps in positioning among potential competitors
Understand relative market share to assess probable winners and losers
Avoid isomorphism, the tendency for competitors to act together
Profile Current Attributes and Competitors Competitive Choices Key Attributes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Newco Using GPS No Yes Yes No Yes No No Current truck satellite comms No No Yes Yes No No No Landline Phone in No No Yes Yes No No Yes Cell phones Three-month ROI Fixed Cost Technical Reliability Single Supplier Crossborder Ease Customer Access Ease of Use
Overlay Defendability of Attributes Against Competitors For One Year Competitive Choices Key Attributes YES NO Yes Yes NO YES YES Newco Using Mobile Satellite No Yes Yes No Yes No No Current truck satellite comms No No Yes Yes No No No Landline Phone in No No Yes Yes No No Yes Cell phones Three-month ROI Fixed Cost Technical Reliability Single Supplier Crossborder Ease Customer Access Ease of Use
Map Each Attribute by Relative Competitive Strength and Importance Least Important Most Important Attribute Ease of Use Cust. Access Crossborder Single supply Reliability Fixed cost 3-mnth ROI 10 N N N N N N N C C C C C C C L L L L L L L S S S S S S S Worst 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8 9 Competitive Rating Best 0 6 5 10 7 8 9 2 3 4 1
Topics
Find your positioning platform
Create a positioning statement
Establish a branding platform
Slide
Create a Positioning Statement
Upon completion,
You will know about
Positioning statements
The two main positioning techniques
The six techniques for executing positioning and building brand
You will know how to
Select a positioning technique
Articulate a positioning statement
Assess the right position technique
Step 5: Create Three Positioning Statements
A brief articulation of what
Your product is
For whom it is targeted
The benefit that it delivers
Focus on preparing three positioning statements:
A statement that targets product advantage
A statement that stresses target segment benefits
A statement that takes aim at competitor’s weaknesses
Must form the first sentence of your “elevator” pitch
Must be simple enough at least for the target segment to understand in a sales context
Must be simple enough for the financial community to understand
Two Main Positioning Methods: Rational and Emotional
Rational works best for high-technology/b-to-b market
Rational works best for start-ups
Tied to hard benefits
Appeals to early majority markets/pragmatists
Results-oriented or quantifiable
Emotional positioning better suited to consumer products or to large companies
IBM positions on Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt
Apple positions on the “personality” of the Apple user
HP positions on expressing “personal imagination”
Be aware that there is always an emotional side effect when using rational positioning – you are talking to people, not computers
Step 6: Try Each On For Size and Select by Ability to Focus
Use the Pitch Formula to help structure you statement
You must include Product Name, Specific Buyer or Target Segment, Compelling Advantage or Benefit and Price/Value Statement
Product advantage or attribute
Premium-priced FuseTalk is the only discussion forum with the reliability and scalability to ensure that high-volume sites stay accessible
Target market benefit
Premium-priced FuseTalk is for support managers who need to reduce the cost of non-complex support calls by offering service through a discussion forum platform
Competitive weakness
Unlike other discussion forum platforms, premium-priced FuseTalk offers high-volume site managers the reliability and scalability that they need.
Step 7: Select an Execution Approach Based on Six Techniques
Once the statement is clear, it’s time to determine how to articulate it in a believable, compelling and sustainable way
Six main techniques for building a positioning execution plan
Product advantage, attribute or benefit
Users of your product
Occasions of use
Against an existing product category
Against a specific competitor
Association
A specific target market problem
Position by Product Benefit or Attribute
Very common in technology and startup positioning
Focus on the product or technology benefit has a high appeal both to early adopters and pragmatists
Price tied closely to benefit or attribute
FuseTalk is the most reliable and scalable mid-priced discussion forum platform available for high-volume sites.
Position by Users of Your Product
Also common in technology and startup positioning
Appeals directly to sense of personal value and convenience
Beautifully executed by IBM – leverage the fear and uncertainty of IT managers if they can’t deliver on ambitious corporate plans
FuseTalk never crashes – and so you never have to crawl from your warm bed after you do.
Position by Occasions of Use
Not common in technology and startup positioning
Tends to appeal at an emotional level
Crosses over into “user” positioning because of its emotional approach
Can be successfully used as a “carrot” or “snob” technique
Scalable and reliable FuseTalk, the right discussion forum for when you hit that magic 1 million users mark!
Position Against an Existing Product Category
The technique of choice for startups who need to be first in a new product category
Usually creates a new sub-category within a larger category or splits a category
Very dependent on good segmentation
Focuses on a key attribute and then creates the new category – the product comes second
FuseTalk, the leading high-volume discussion forum platform specifically for high volume sites.
Position Against a Specific Competitor
DOES NOT involve product comparisons
DOES involve repositioning existing competitor
Focuses on a key competitor weakness that the competitor cannot easily fix
A very effective second-entry strategy
Not effective against much larger competitors – use new product category positioning technique instead
Can be very expensive unless you focus in a very narrow market against a specific competitor
90% of UBB’s customers have less than 1000 visitors a day. 90% of FuseTalk’s have over 1 million visitors a day. Who would you trust your forums to?
Position By Association
Effective if you have a powerful and vocal lead customer, endorsement by a key industry group or a compelling spokesperson
Also works when associated with images, places, events
Marlboro’s association with cowboys and the wild West is a classic and enduring use of association
Requires a long-term consistent program to make the right impact
Has an emotional component
Macromedia chose FuseTalk to run their online support. Shouldn’t you?
Position by Problem
Common high technology and startup technique
Tied to a specific problem and proposes a clear benefit
Gives the advantage of a very clear position
Challenge is to ensure defendability
Focus on ROI and cost/value equation
Answering a support question by phone costs $35. Responding to a forum question costs 35 cents. Do the math. FuseTalk.
Topics
Find your positioning platform
Create a positioning statement
Establish a branding platform
Slide
Establish a Branding Platform
Upon completion,
You will know about
The role of branding as the outward articulation of position
The components of a branding program
The key criteria for selecting a marketing agency
And you will know how to
Choose the right image for your branding
Know when your marketing agency is going wrong
Your Brand Promise
Characteristics
Definition
Step 8: Articulate Your Position Through Consistent Branding
A brand is completely meaningless if it has no positioning behind it
A brand MUST STAND FOR SOMETHING
A brand must be consistent and believable
A brand should be firm and focused – avoid the temptation to have such a broad brand that it can stand for any kind of product
A brand is a name and a visual image that immediately evokes the position that you claim and own
Elements of a Brand
Vision/mission
Positioning
Brand promise (of value)
Brand character
Brand Pyramid
Choose a Name and Logo That Matches Your Position
Your startup name and logo must
Focus on your product
Evoke your category and your benefit
Be simple, memorable and have good “decay” properties
Elicit a mental image or emotion
Have obvious meaning (e.g. avoid acronyms and meaningless groups of letters)
Have an available URL if possible
Be legally available
Avoid being cute, cool, clever or punny
Select a Name and Logo Carefully and Use Help Attributes Associations for Ease of Use Micro Mini Tiny Ant Seed Mighty Mite Small unit/ Unobtrusive Ease Peace Breathing Heartbeat No driver intervention Dependable Bee Wolf Sun Ant Fire Systems Osmosis John Henry Always working -- reliable Auto Automatic Always No action required Latin/Greco roots Qualities Natural Enviro. Objects Characters
Choose Your Help Carefully
Never let an agency’s “creativity” cloud your positioning
If they cannot or will not participate or honour your positioning and brand objectives, run!
Test, test and test and measure, measure, measure
No matter how clever the campaign, if it doesn’t plant your product name and position, it’s a waste of time and money
Insist on a consolidated branding approach that takes in the strategic and the tactical
0 comments
Post a comment