Copyright Exceptions: Perspective of a Researcher-Led Publisher

433 views
397 views

Published on

Talk on the need for copyright exceptions in Europe, by Brian Hole of Ubiquity Press. Presented at the Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, December 13th 2012.

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
433
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Copyright Exceptions: Perspective of a Researcher-Led Publisher

  1. 1. Copyright exceptions:Perspective of a researcher-led publisherBrian HoleCentre for European Policy Studies – December 13th 2012 brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
  2. 2. 1. Background to UP 2. Research 3. Text and data mining 4. Teaching 5. General points 6. Harmonizationbrian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
  3. 3. Ubiquity Press Not a typical publisher • Founded and run by researchers, for researchers • Broad base including humanities and social sciences • Fully open access • Strongly encourage open data and software publishing brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
  4. 4. The Social Contract of Science • Research requires an open, effective and efficient distribution model • I.e. open access, open data, non-restrictive copyrightbrian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
  5. 5. ResearchThe ideal situation: • Copyright of publicly-funded research should ideally not be transferred to private interests, such as publishers • Copyright should be retained by the producers of the work • Research should be released under open licences permitting all forms of reuse (e.g. Creative Commons)For other cases: • A fair dealing exception is required that allows academics (and the public) to use material for private study, criticism and review • Restricting the above prevents open and effective research brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
  6. 6. Text and data mining[the benefits of text mining include]: “increased researcher efficiency;unlocking hidden information and developing new knowledge; exploringnew horizons; improved research and evidence base; and improving thesearch process and quality. Broader economic and societal benefitsinclude cost savings and productivity gains, innovative new servicedevelopment, new business models and new medical treatments.” JISC“The downstream value of high quality, high throughput chemicalinformation extracted from the literature can be measured againstconventional abstraction services… with a combined annual turnover ofperhaps $500-1,000 million dollars. We believe our tools are capable ofbuilding the next and better generation of services.” Peter Murray-Rust brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
  7. 7. Text and data miningThe ideal situation: • Open access and open data (with CC-By and CC0 licenses) mean that all research text and data are available for mining, reuse and analysis • But many established publishers want to forbid, restrict, or control thisFor other cases: • A fair dealing exception is required that allows for academic (and arguably other, e.g. commercial) mining of both text and data • It is important that this not only apply to text – data is extremely important as well brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
  8. 8. TeachingThe ideal situation: • All research outputs should be open access and available for reuse in teaching, both in research institutions and more broadly • Once again established publishers want to prevent thisFor other cases: • The EC recommendation should be strengthened to require a fair dealing exception that allows for copyright material to be freely used in teaching • A fair dealing exception for examinations is also required so that copyright material included in exams can be made available afterwards for others to study and practice with brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
  9. 9. General points • Non-commercial restrictions on exceptions for research outputs are not in the public interest and stifle innovation • It needs to be made clear as to whether facts are or are not copyrightable – some academics have been threatened with legal action by publishers • The EU Database Directive is potentially restrictive and should be reviewed brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
  10. 10. Harmonization • Modern research projects operate with large international teams, based in multiple countries • Copyright exceptions are currently not harmonized across Europe, so researchers have to deal with a different set of exceptions in each country • An effort should therefore be made to achieve harmonization of exceptions brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
  11. 11. Questions?Thanks to Paul Ayris (UCL) and Peter Murray-Rust (OKFN) for their inputLinks http://www.ubiquitypress.com http://blogs.ch.cam.ac.uk/pmr/2012/03/21/my-response-to-hargreaves-on-copyright- reform-i-request-the-removal-of-contractual-restrictions-and-independent-oversight http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/value-and-benefits-of-text- mining.aspx brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress

×