September 24, 2013 Special Meeting Agenda packet

City Council Agenda Page 1 of 2 September 24, 2013
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING
AN AGENDA OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, September 24, 2013
McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room
500 Rio Concho Drive
San Angelo, TX 76903
THE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.
ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTH
MAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE
IS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK,
ROOM 210, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. every
day for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting.
As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate”
Thank You!
I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.)
A. Call to Order
B. Prayer and Pledge
II. REGULAR AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT
1. Consideration of approving an amendment to Vision Plan component of the San Angelo
Comprehensive Plan update adopted in 2009, specifically properties located within an approximately
1,800 foot radius of the intersection of Armstrong Street and 28th Street in north-central San Angelo
(Presentation by Interim Senior Planner Jeff Hintz)
2. Consideration of approving an amendment to Vision Plan component of the San Angelo
Comprehensive Plan update adopted in 2009, specifically properties located south from the
intersection of Grand Canal Road and US Highway 277, south to the city limit line, and properties
located just east of the city limits line, but outside the city limits in southern San Angelo
3. First Public Hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending Chapter 12 pertaining
to Mobile Home Regulations of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER12“PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT”,ARTICLE12.500
“MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS”, OF THE SAN ANGELO CODE OF ORDINANCES BY
AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE 12.500 TO READ, “MANUFACTURED HOME AND
MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS”; RESTATING SECTION 12.503 “SKIRTING” BY ADDING
MANUFACTUREDHOMESANDPROVIDINGANEXCEPTIONFORLICENSEDDEALERSHIPS
AND RETAILERS; AMENDING SECTION 12.504 “TEMPORARY MOBILE HOME
INSTALLATION” BY AMENDING THE SECTION TITLETO“TEMPORARYMANUFACTURED
HOME, MOBILE HOME OR BUILDING INSTALLATION”, AND RESTATING
SUBPARAGRAPHS (a) AND (c) OF SAID SECTION TO REFERENCE MANUFACTUREDHOME;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE

City Council Agenda Page 2 of 2 September 24, 2013
4. Discussion and possible action on matters related to the fiscal year 2013-2014 budget to include:
a. Stormwater Fund
b. Wastewater transfers
c. General capital projects
d. Other items as needed
(Presentation by Budget Manager Morgan Chegwidden)
III. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES
5. Announcements and consideration of Future Agenda Items
The Regular City Council meeting on Tuesday, October 15, 2013, will be held at 5:30 P.M.
6. Adjournment
Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter
551, Friday, September 20, 2013, at 5:00 P.M.
/s/________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

City of San Angelo
Finance Department
Memo
Date: September 17, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Morgan Chegwidden, Budget Manager
Subject: Agenda Item for September 24, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Morgan Chegwidden, Budget Manager, 653-6291
Caption: Regular Item
Discussion and possible action on matters related to the fiscal year 2013-
2014 Budget to include:
a. Stormwater Fund;
b. Wastewater transfers;
c. General capital projects, and;
d. Other items as needed.
Summary: As requested last meeting:
a. Today’s discussion also serves to provide greater detail on the
Stormwater fund as requested by Council. Detailed justification is
attached for your reference.
b. Staff has presented options on changing the Wastewater PILOT transfer.
We continue to work with the City Attorney’s Office to draft a solution as
requested by Council.
c. We will discuss opportunities to fund general capital projects. The budget
was adopted with a total of $1,756,529. Council further moved to allocate
$316,000 to Fairmount Cemetery improvements. Each year $250,000 is
set aside for Fire truck replacement. That leaves $1,190,529 remaining
available for allocation to other general capital projects. Eligible projects
include street reconstruction, storm water quantity improvements, Fort
Concho rehabilitations, and 19
th
street sidewalks, etc. A complete list of
projects eligible for consideration is located in the 2013-2018 Capital
Improvement Plan.
Fiscal Year 2014 Budget $1,756,529
Fairmount Cemetery (316,000)
Fire truck (250,000)
Remainder Available $1,190,529
d. And finally, staff can speak to other budget items the Council has need of
discussing at this meeting. These other items can include cell phone
research, Workers Compensation Fund budget, Hotel Occupancy Tax
allocations to Convention & Visitors Bureau and San Angelo Cultural
Affairs Council, and other issues as needed.

History: Staff has discussed with Council during June, July, and August 2013 the budget priorities. On
September 3, 2013 the City Council adopted the 2013-2014 budget ordinance.
Financial Impact: None at this time.
Related Vision Item (if applicable): Financial Vision.
Other Information/Recommendation: N/A.
Attachments: Stormwater Fund budget detailed justification; 2013-2018 Capital
Improvement Plan.
Presentation: By Morgan Chegwidden
Publication: None
Reviewed by Director: Tina Bunnell, Finance Director, 657-4268

P R E P A R E D 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 B U D G E T P R E P A R A T I O N W O R K S H E E T P A G E 1
F O R F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 4 A C C O U N T I N G P E R I O D 1 1 / 2 0 1 3
2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F
2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &
A C C O U N T N U M B E R A C C O U N T D E S C R I P T I O N A C T U A L S O R I G B U D G E T B U D G E T Y T D A C T U A L S P R O P O S E D B U D 1 3 - 1 4 E N T R Y
F U N D 2 4 0 S T O R M W A T E R
R E V E N U E
2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 1 7 . 0 0 - 0 0 S T O R M W A T E R F E E 2 , 4 7 6 , 2 7 3 - 2 , 5 8 6 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 5 8 6 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 3 1 9 , 0 8 7 - 2 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 - 1 3 , 5 0 0 -
L E V E L T E X T T E X T A M T
0 4 0 5 S T O R M W A T E R F E E O N R E S I D E N T I A L A N D C O M M E R C I A L
C U S T O M E R S 2 , 5 8 6 , 5 0 0
I N C P E R S K - M T 4 - 1 7 - 1 3 1 3 , 5 0 0
2 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 6 1 . 1 0 - 0 0 I N T E R E S T O N I N V E S T M E N T S 1 , 3 5 6 - 0 0 2 , 6 8 6 - 3 , 0 0 0 - 3 , 0 0 0 -
0 4 0 5 P E R S K - M C 4 - 1 7 - 1 3 3 , 0 0 0
3 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 8 0 . 1 0 - 0 0 M I S C 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 8 0 . 6 0 - 0 0 D I S C O U N T S 1 8 - 0 0 4 0 - 0 0
2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 9 1 . 2 0 - 0 0 T R A N S F E R F R O M G E N E R A L 9 5 , 0 0 0 - 9 5 , 0 0 0 - 9 5 , 0 0 0 - 7 9 , 1 5 0 - 9 5 , 0 0 0 - 0
0 4 0 5 R E V E N U E R E C E I V E D F R O M G E N E R A L F U N D S F O R M O W I N G O F 9 5 , 0 0 0
R I G H T O F W A Y S A N D E A S E M E N T S N O T A S S O C I A T E D W I T H
S T O R M W A T E R
9 5 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 9 2 . 1 0 - 0 0 S A L E O F F I X E D A S S E T S 0 0 0 0 0 0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* R E V E N U E 2 , 5 7 2 , 6 4 7 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 4 0 0 , 9 6 3 - 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 - 1 6 , 5 0 0 -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* * S T O R M W A T E R 2 , 5 7 2 , 6 4 7 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 4 0 0 , 9 6 3 - 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 - 1 6 , 5 0 0 -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* * * S T O R M W A T E R 2 , 5 7 2 , 6 4 7 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 4 0 0 , 9 6 3 - 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 - 1 6 , 5 0 0 -

2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F
2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &
D E P T 5 8 S T O R M W A T E R
D I V 0 0 S T O R M W A T E R
E X P E N D I T U R E
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 1 0 F U L L - T I M E S A L 5 9 6 , 0 0 6 6 7 2 , 0 0 8 6 7 2 , 0 0 8 5 0 9 , 3 6 3 6 4 9 , 7 6 0 2 2 , 2 4 8 -
0 4 0 5 4 / 2 9 / 1 3 B E N C H M A R K - L B 6 4 9 , 4 6 7
* * * D O N O T C H A N G E A N Y T H I N G A B O V E T H I S L I N E * * *
C O R R E C T E D B E N C H 5 - 7 L B 5 5 6 -
5 / 2 3 / 1 3 L B I N C R E A S E T O B A L B G T A F T E R C O R R E C T I O N S 8 4 9
6 4 9 , 7 6 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 3 0 O V E R T I M E 3 , 6 7 6 6 , 0 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 3 , 5 2 8 6 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 O V E R T I M E E X P E N S E S 6 , 0 0 0
6 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 3 2 S I C K L E A V E B U Y B A C K 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 4 0 L E A V E P A Y O F F S 6 4 , 4 9 9 0 0 1 4 , 1 8 6 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 5 0 I N C E N T I V E P A Y 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 6 0 C A R A L L O W A N C E S 1 , 0 6 3 1 , 0 6 3 1 , 0 6 3 6 6 5 1 , 0 6 3 0
0 4 0 5 M O V E 2 5 % O F S T O R M W A T E R E N G I N E E R 1 , 0 6 3
1 , 0 6 3
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 1 0 G R O U P I N S U R A N C E 8 2 , 2 7 1 1 0 8 , 6 9 6 1 0 8 , 6 9 6 7 3 , 1 9 1 1 2 5 , 1 5 9 1 6 , 4 6 3
0 4 0 5 4 / 2 9 / 1 3 B E N C H M A R K - L B 1 2 5 , 1 5 9
* * * D O N O T C H A N G E A N Y T H I N G A B O V E T H I S L I N E * *
1 2 5 , 1 5 9
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 1 1 R E T I R E E I N S U R A N C E 8 , 9 3 8 0 0 1 0 , 7 2 6 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 2 0 F I C A 4 8 , 0 9 2 5 4 , 7 2 1 5 4 , 7 2 1 3 9 , 5 6 7 4 9 , 6 3 8 5 , 0 8 3 -
0 4 0 5 4 / 2 9 / 1 3 B E N C H M A R K - L B 4 9 , 6 8 1
* * * D O N O T C H A N G E A N Y T H I N G A B O V E T H I S L I N E * *
C O R R E C T E D B E N C H 5 - 7 - 1 3 L B 4 3 -
4 9 , 6 3 8
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 3 0 R E T I R E M E N T 1 2 0 , 4 8 3 1 3 5 , 4 0 5 1 3 5 , 4 0 5 9 9 , 6 4 7 1 1 8 , 8 1 2 1 6 , 5 9 3 -
0 4 0 5 4 / 2 9 / 1 3 B E N C H M A R K - L B 1 2 2 , 9 4 2
C O R R E C T E D B E N C H 5 - 7 - 1 3 L B 1 0 5 -
5 / 3 1 / 1 3 L B T M R S D E C R E A S E 4 , 0 2 5 -
1 1 8 , 8 1 2
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 5 0 U N E M P L O Y M E N T I N S U R A N C E 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F
2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 6 0 W O R K E R S C O M P . I N S U R A N C E 3 2 , 6 9 1 3 4 , 2 6 6 3 4 , 2 6 6 3 0 , 7 7 3 3 8 , 8 2 7 4 , 5 6 1
0 4 0 5 4 / 2 9 / 1 3 B E N C H M A R K - L B 3 8 , 9 7 2
C O R R E C T E D B E N C H 5 - 7 - 1 3 L B 1 4 5 -
3 8 , 8 2 7
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 2 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S 9 5 , 8 2 0 9 2 , 9 7 2 1 1 4 , 1 0 0 7 6 , 4 0 2 1 1 4 , 1 0 0 2 1 , 1 2 8
0 4 0 5 U C R A C O N T R A C T 9 2 , 9 7 2
5 / 2 3 / 1 3 L B I N C R T O B A L A N C E B U D G E T 2 1 , 1 2 8
1 1 4 , 1 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 2 1 A U D I T I N G F E E S 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 3 2 S O F T W A R E M A I N T E N A N C E 4 , 4 9 3 3 , 5 0 0 5 , 5 0 0 5 , 4 5 0 3 , 5 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 E S R I - A R C E D I T O R L I C E N S E - S E C O N D A R Y / M A I N T A I N A N C E / 3 , 5 0 0
T E C H S U P P O R T ( G I S S T O R M W A T E R )
E S R I S P A T I A L A N A L Y S T E X T E N S I O N A N N U A L M A I N T E N A N C E
( G I S S T O R M W A T E R )
A U T O C A D A N N U A L M A I N T E N A N C E
3 , 5 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 3 3 C O M P U T E R M A I N T E N A N C E 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 M E M O R Y U P G R A D E , N E T W O R K C A B L E S , 1 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 4 0 T E C H N I C A L S E R V I C E S 1 1 , 2 7 8 2 0 , 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 5 , 6 6 3 2 0 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 L A B S A M P L E A N A L Y S I S A F T E R E A C H R A I N E V E N T 2 0 , 0 0 0
2 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 5 0 S P E C I A L S E R V I C E S 1 , 1 0 9 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 3 4 7 5 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 -
0 4 0 5 C O N T R A C T C L E A N I N G , C O N T R A C T T V I N S P E C T I O N , 1 0 , 0 0 0
E D U C A T I O N A N D S T O R M W A T E R P E R M I T F E E S
5 / 2 3 / 1 3 L B D E C R T O B A L B U D G E T 5 , 0 0 0 -
5 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 1 1 W A T E R / S E W E R U T I L I T I E S 5 , 3 4 6 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 6 , 6 7 2 1 0 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 W A T E R A N D S E W E R U T I L I T Y B I L L S , W A T E R B I L L S F O R 1 0 , 0 0 0

2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F
2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &
S W E E P E R W A T E R C O N S U M P T I O N
W A T E R F E E S F O R S W E E P E R W A S H D O W N S T A T I O N
1 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 1 3 E L E C T R I C I T Y 3 , 2 2 7 3 , 0 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 3 , 0 3 3 3 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 P A R T I A L P A Y M E N T O F E L E C T R I C I T Y P A Y M E N T 3 , 0 0 0
3 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 2 3 C U S T O D I A L 9 0 6 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 8 3 1 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 C U S T O D I A L S U P P L I E S F O R R E S T R O O M S A N D B U I L D I N G 1 , 0 0 0
M O P S , B R O O M S , C A N L I N E R S , P A P E R T O W E L S , T O I L E T T I S S U E
1 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 0 G E N E R A L M A I N T E N A N C E 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 1 B L D G . & G R O U N D S M A I N T . 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 2 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E 4 9 9 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 3 5 7 1 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 H P P L O T T E R , O C E S C A N N E R , P R I N T E R , G P S U N I T , C O M P U T E R 1 , 0 0 0
P A R T S , A N D S E R V I C E S S P L I T B E T W E E N E N G I N E E R A N D
G I S A N A L Y S T
1 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 3 V E H I C L E M A I N T E N A N C E 8 2 , 3 6 2 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 7 6 , 1 3 7 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 S H O P C H A R G E S F O R 5 S W E E P E R S , 5 M O W I N G T R A C T O R S , 1 0 0 , 0 0 0
1 B A C K H O E , 2 E X M A R K M O W E R S , 2 1 2 Y A R D D U M P T R U C K ,
1 W H E E L L O A D E R , 1 S K I D S T E E R L O A D E R A N D T R A I L E R ,
1 E X M A R K T R A I L E R , 9 P I C K U P S , 1 B R U S H C H I P P E R ,
6 Y A R D D U M P T R U C K , 3 B A T W I N G S H R E D D E R S , 4 - 6 F T
S H R E D D E R S , 1 H E R B I C I D E S P R A Y U N I T , B O B C A T S H R E D D E R ,
1 P O N T O O N B O A T , 2 F L A T B O T T O M B O A T S
1 0 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 4 S T A T I O N A R Y E Q U I P . M A I N T . 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 5 S Y S T E M M A I N T E N A N C E 1 6 , 7 7 4 3 0 , 0 0 0 4 0 , 0 0 0 2 9 , 5 1 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 C O N C R E T E , R E B A R , P A T C H I N G M A T E R I A L , L I M E S T O N E , P A I N T 5 0 , 0 0 0
P V C P I P E , C O R R G A T E D P I P E , S T E E L P I P E , G R O U T
L U M B E R F O R F O R M S , S T O R M D R A I N G R A T E S , R I P R A P
E R O S I O N B L A N K E T S , E R O S I O N R O L L S , S T A P L E S
5 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 4 2 R E N T O F E Q U I P M E N T 2 , 8 7 2 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 4 , 2 2 4 1 0 , 0 0 0 0

2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F
2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &
0 4 0 5 R E N T A L O F S P E C I A L I Z E D E Q U I P M E N T S U C H A S G R A D A L L , 1 0 , 0 0 0
V A C - C O N F O R C O N T R A C T C L E A N I N G ,
K Y O C E R A C O L O R C O P I E R L E A S E
1 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 2 0 I N S U R A N C E - C A T A S T R O P H E 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 2 1 I N S U R A N C E - L I A B I L I T Y 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 3 0 C O M M U N I C A T I O N 2 , 8 1 0 4 , 0 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 1 , 8 6 1 4 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 V O I C E O V E R I P P H O N E S F O R S T O R M W A T E R S U P E R I N T E N D E N T 4 , 0 0 0
E N G I N E E R , G I S A N A L Y S T , S U P E R V I S O R A N D S W I N S P E C T O R
I N T E R N E T C O N N E C T I O N S E R V I C E
4 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 3 1 C E L L U L A R P H O N E 4 , 0 5 2 5 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 3 , 8 0 9 5 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 C E L L P H O N E C H A R G E S F O R S T O R M W A T E R S U P E R I N T E N D E N T , 5 , 0 0 0
E N G I N E E R , S W I N S P E C T O R A N D G I S A N A L Y S T
2 C R E W L E A D E R S
5 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 4 0 A D V E R T I S I N G 1 4 , 4 9 4 2 0 , 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 1 2 , 9 0 9 2 0 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 L A M A R B I L L B O A R D S , S T A N D A R D T I M E S , F A M I L Y M A G A Z I N E , 2 0 , 0 0 0
C O N E X I O N H I S P A N A ,
2 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 5 0 P R I N T I N G & C O P Y I N G 3 3 2 5 0 2 5 0 1 2 5 0 0
0 4 0 5 B U S I N E S S C A R D S , M A P P R O D U C T I O N C O S T S , K Y O C E R A 2 5 0
C O P I E S , P O S T E R S , B O O K M A R K S , B R O C H U R E S ,
O T H E R / D E S I G N
2 5 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 8 0 T R A V E L & L O D G I N G 7 , 3 6 1 7 , 5 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 1 , 9 2 3 7 , 5 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 T R A V E L E X P E N S E S F O R S T O R M W A T E R S U P E R I N T E N D E N T , C I T Y 7 , 5 0 0
E N G I N E E R , S T O R M W A T E R E N G I N E E R , A N D G I S A N A L Y S T , T O
A N N U A L E P A R E G I O N A L S T O R M W A T E R C O N F E R E N C E .
T R A V E L E X P E N S E S T O N A T I O N A L E S R I C O N F E R E N C E I N
S A N D I E G O F O K R G I S A N A L Y S T .
T R A V E L E X P E N S E S T O E S R I T R A I N I N G I N S A N A N T O N I O
F O R G I S A N A L Y S T

2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F
2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &
7 , 5 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 8 1 M I L E A G E 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 R E I M B U R S E M E N T F O R M I L E A G E T O G I S A N A L Y S T F O R F I E L D 1 , 0 0 0
W O R K , M I L E A G E T O A N D F R O M C O N F E R E N C E S A N D S C H O O L S
1 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 9 0 C O N V E N T I O N S & S C H O O L S 3 , 6 3 7 7 , 5 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 5 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 E S R I I N S T R U C T O R L E A D T R A I N I N G F E E S 7 , 5 0 0
A N N U A L E P A R E G I O N A L S T O R M W A T E R C O N F E R E N C E
R E G I S T R A T I O N C I T Y E N G I N E E R A N D S T O R M W A T E R E N G I N E E R
G I S A N A L Y S T , A N D S T O R M W A T E R S U P E R I N T E N D E N T
C O N T I N U I N G E D U C A T I O N T R A I N I N G F O R C O N T I N U I N G
E D U C A T I O N C R E D I T S F O R P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R
( S T O R M W A T E R E N G I N E E R )
C A R T I G R A P H U P D A T E S A N D M A I N T E N A N C E
W A T E R A N D W A S T E W A T E R C E U C O U R S E S
7 , 5 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 9 1 P R O F . D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S 2 4 7 5 0 0 5 0 0 7 5 5 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R L I C E N S E Y E A R L Y R E N E W A L 5 0 0
W A T E R A N D W A S T E W A T E R L I C E N S E R E N E W A L F O R
S T O R M W A T E R S U P E R I N T E N D E N T
5 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S 1 , 6 6 5 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 8 4 2 2 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 P E N S , N O T E P A D S , F O L D E R S , P A P E R C L I P S , F O A M B O A R D , 2 , 0 0 0
C U T T E R S , C O P Y P A P E R F O R K Y O C E R A , N O T E B O O K S ,
T A B L E T S .
2 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 1 F O R M S 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 2 M I N O R A P P A R A T U S & T O O L S 2 7 , 8 2 3 3 0 , 0 0 0 1 3 , 0 0 0 4 , 7 3 6 2 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 -
0 4 0 5 W E E D E A T E R S , S H O V E L S , 3 0 , 0 0 0
C H A I N S A W S , P O L E S A W S , R A K E S , B R O O M S , W A T E R C A N S ,
F U E L C A N S , C H A I N S ,
5 / 2 3 / 1 3 L B D E C R T O B A L B U D G E T 1 0 , 0 0 0 -
2 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 3 U N I F O R M S 1 , 5 6 7 6 , 5 0 0 6 , 5 0 0 3 , 2 4 3 6 , 5 0 0 0

2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F
2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &
0 4 0 5 U N I F O R M S F O R 2 1 S T O R M W A T E R E M P L O Y E E S 6 , 5 0 0
6 , 5 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 4 P O S T A G E & S H I P P I N G 5 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 5 1 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 E D U C A T I O N M A I L O U T S 1 0 0
1 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 6 G E N E R A L S U P P L I E S 4 , 9 7 5 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 , 1 8 4 5 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 S U R V E Y S T A K E S , F L A G G I N G , K E Y S , W E E D E A T E R H E A D S 5 , 0 0 0
W E E D E A T E R S T R I N G , R A G S , C H A I N S A W C H A I N S
R E P A I R S O N L A W N E Q U I P M E N T
5 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 7 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S 1 5 5 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 -
0 4 0 5 P L O T T E R C A R T R I D G E / P R I N T H E A D S , P L O T T E R I N K J E T B O N D 1 , 0 0 0
R O L L P A P E R , P L O T T E R P H O T O G R A P H I C R O L L P A P E R ,
K Y O C E R A T O N E R
1 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 8 S A F E T Y S U P P L I E S 9 , 8 4 4 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 4 , 0 9 9 1 0 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 C O N E S , B A R R E L S , H A R D H A T S , R U B B E R B O O T S , S A F E T Y 1 0 , 0 0 0
G L A S S E S , R U B B E R G L O V E S , L E A T H E R G L O V E S
1 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 2 6 G A S O L I N E 1 0 1 , 6 2 4 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 7 5 , 5 6 3 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 0
0 4 0 5 F U E L F O R F L E E T 1 0 0 , 0 0 0
1 0 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 5 0 C H E M I C A L & M E D I C A L 4 , 6 7 7 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 6 7 5 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 -
0 4 0 5 H E R B I C I D E 1 0 , 0 0 0
5 / 2 3 / 1 3 L B D E C R T O B A L A N C E B U D G E T 5 , 0 0 0 -
5 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 8 - 3 1 B I L L I N G C H A R G E 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 8 - 6 0 F R A N C H I S E F E E 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 8 - 9 0 A D M I N S E R V I C E S T R A N S F E R 0 1 3 2 , 6 3 6 1 3 2 , 6 3 6 1 1 0 , 5 3 0 1 3 2 , 6 3 6 0

2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F
2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &
0 4 0 5 I N D I R E C T C O S T - T R X F R T O G E N E R A L F U N D F O R S V C S 1 3 2 , 6 3 6
P R O V I D E D P E R I N D I R E C T C O S T P L A N - M T 8 - 3 - 1 2
1 3 2 , 6 3 6
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 2 0 B U I L D I N G S 2 8 , 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 3 0 I M P R O V E M E N T S N O T B L D G . 7 0 , 2 7 9 7 1 1 , 8 5 1 9 5 0 , 7 2 3 0 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 2 1 1 , 8 5 1 -
0 4 0 5 R E D A R R O Y O T R A I L C O N T R I B U T I O N 5 0 0 , 0 0 0
5 0 0 , 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 4 1 M A C H I N E R Y 1 9 8 , 9 7 7 2 6 0 , 5 3 2 5 3 2 0 2 6 8 , 8 0 0 8 , 2 6 8
0 4 0 5 M A C H I N E R Y R E P L A C E M E N T F U N D S 2 6 8 , 8 0 0
2 6 8 , 8 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 4 2 V E H I C L E S 1 1 6 , 5 3 3 7 0 , 0 0 0 7 0 , 0 0 0 5 1 , 3 7 8 8 1 , 5 0 0 1 1 , 5 0 0
0 4 0 5 P I C K U P R E P L A C E M E N T F U N D S 8 1 , 5 0 0
8 1 , 5 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 4 4 T E C H N O L O G Y C A P I T A L 6 , 9 9 2 0 2 , 5 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 5 0 C O N T I N G E N C I E S 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 , 8 5 5 2 1 1 , 8 5 5
0 4 0 5 M A C H I N E R Y A N D V E H I C L E R E P L A C E M E N T F U N D 2 0 7 , 8 3 0
I N C R E A S E T O B A L A N C E B U D G E T - M C 8 - 9 - 1 3 4 , 0 2 5
2 1 1 , 8 5 5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* E X P E N D I T U R E 1 , 7 8 8 , 7 3 5 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 1 , 2 6 4 , 8 8 4 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 1 6 , 5 0 0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* * S T O R M W A T E R 1 , 7 8 8 , 7 3 5 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 1 , 2 6 4 , 8 8 4 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 1 6 , 5 0 0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* * * S T O R M W A T E R 1 , 7 8 8 , 7 3 5 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 1 , 2 6 4 , 8 8 4 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 1 6 , 5 0 0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* * * * S T O R M W A T E R 7 8 3 , 9 1 2 - 0 0 1 , 1 3 6 , 0 7 9 - 0 0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 8 3 , 9 1 2 - 0 0 1 , 1 3 6 , 0 7 9 - 0 0

City of San Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: September 17, 2013
To: City Council members
From: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner
Subject: Vision Plan - Proposed Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for
the following area of the City:
Location: Properties located within an approximately 1,800 foot radius of the
intersection of Armstrong Street and 28th Street in north-central
San Angelo. Please see attached maps in this report for a more
graphic depiction of this area.
Purpose: Approval of this request will change the Vision Plan Map of the area
Contacts: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner -and- 657-4210
AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services
Caption: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO VISION PLAN COMPONENT
OF THE SAN ANGELO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
ADOPTED IN 2009, SPECIFICALLY PROPERTIES LOCATED
WITHIN AN APPROXIMATELY 1,800 FOOT RADIUS OF THE
INTERSECTION OF ARMSTRONG STREET AND 28TH STREET IN
NORTH-CENTRAL SAN ANGELO.
Summary: The City Council may:
Approve the proposed Vision Plan map amendments as presented;
Remand the Vision Plan map back to Planning Commission for further
discussion; or
Deny the proposed Vision Plan Map Amendment in its entirety or on a
property by property basis; or
Make Changes deemed necessary and approve the request.

Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed Vision
Plan Map Amendment.
Planning Commission recommend approval of this request by a vote of 5-0 at the
August 19, 2013 meeting.
History and Background:
Mr. Art De La Pena approached staff about a zone change to a commercial usage in
April of 2013 on a property he owns in this area. After discussion with staff and further
elaboration into the business type that was proposed, an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan would need to take place before this request for commercial
usage could be finalized. This request was brought to the Planning Commission on May
20th and the Planning Commission directed staff to re-examine the Comprehensive
Plan's Vision Plan map in this area, and study the area to bring back a report and any
recommended changes at a future meeting.
Analysis:
The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.
Generally speaking, the predominant land use of this area if one was forced to pick one
word and summarize it would be residential. The overwhelming majority of this study
area (95% of the parcels studied) were existing or currently zoned for residential
development. That being said, staff is aware of the commercial presence in the area
consisting of TX DOT, KLST & KSAN, as well as an auto repair shop (that is currently
under construction), Vision Oil Tools (currently under construction), and the municipal
water district office in this area. Many of these uses have existed for decades, but the
major changes to the area are south of 28th Street and on the west side of Armstrong
Street. in 2012, the Planning Commission heard a request for zone change that allowed
the present construction of the auto repair shop in this area. Recently the site of Vision
Oil Tools transitioned from an outdoor storage facility of vehicles, to that of a warehouse
and office.
This area has infrastructure present and is currently is overwhelmingly residential in
nature. In looking at the Census Data for this area from 2010, this area is home to
approximately 300-350 people at this current time; this is not exact, but it staff's best
guess based upon the Census data gathered and remaining properties not included in
the Census data. The data presented accounts for most of this area rather well, but
there are areas included in staff's study area that do not match a Census Tract or Block.
This is generally avoided whenever possible, so the data can be as accurate as
possible; in this case it was not able to be avoided and the tract with the missing blocks
(see attached map) stretches east to the Paulann area. As such it was not included in
order to keep the data as accurate to this area as possible. The exact number of
population for the blocks highlighted is 283 people at the time the Census information
was collected in late 2009 and early 2010.

At this time there were slightly more males than females; with a one exception (see the
median age for Block 5006), the median ages for this study area are in the early 30's to
early 50's. This grouping of people occupied 103 housing units, 80 of which the owner
resided in and 23 which were rented out. The average household size for those units
that were rented and those units that were owner occupied varied slightly, but the
overall average for all the tracts was right around 3 persons per household. When
looking at the age distribution and family distribution (knowing the average household is
right around 3 people), this is very important to consider when making future land use
decisions for this particular area. This tells one examining the numbers that the majority
of this population are of working age and live in a family situation; 85% (240/283) of
people identified their living situation as a family household at the time of the Census.
When looking at the age of the existing population who are presently referred to as
children or young adults, the majority of this group will be of working or post secondary
education age (assumed to be 15-18 for this purpose) over the next decade. This
means, this area will transition from more of a family environment, with children playing
and a bit more noise to that of a quieter area in the coming decade. As children leave
the house and venture out on their own, the needs and desires of the area will change.
As adults with children reach retirement age, some may have more money since they
are assumed in many cases, to no longer be supporting their offspring. In moving
forward, alternative living options for current residents will likely become an issue for
this area as yard maintenance and other home ownership responsibilities may become
more of a problem in the future. As such, proper opportunities for a retirement center or
assisted living facilities may become a desirable outcome in the future. Without them,
many people could be forced to relocate from the neighborhood where they have lived
for many years due to a lack of housing choices in an appropriate scale and location
within the neighborhood.
Now that there is a little bit of understanding about the existing population and area,
staff can begin to address the current Vision Plan Map and any changes that need to be
made to it. This area currently has a good network of collector, arterial, and local streets
to handle traffic circulation both now and in the future for this residential development.
Caution needs to be exercised when adding new commercial development so that it is
focused at nodes to create centers of activity. Not only is clustering of commercial
enterprises and higher density residential land uses consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan, but it keeps existing neighborhoods of single family nature at this time quiet and
isolated. Additionally, it keeps these traffic generating uses at major intersections where
traffic can be handled and dispersed adequately, away from quiet residential
neighborhoods. By keeping commercial uses at busier corners or nodes, and
introducing appropriate buffers into the neighborhoods mixes of land uses can occur
that promote appropriately scaled developed and isolation of neighborhoods at the
same time.
Long strips of commercial development along major corridors and four lane roads may
seem popular in the short term, but are not sustainable or conducive to redevelopment
in the long term. Chadbourne Street is a prime example of this; a commercial strip of
zoning was designated in the 1950's and introduced zoning that was not of an
appropriate intensity or scale to the surrounding neighborhoods. As a result, many of
these neighborhoods now see dilapidated buildings, lowered property values, and less
interest to develop and/or redevelop properties. Commercial and neighborhood

development can be compatible with one another when appropriate scale and intensity
are observed through planning efforts. That being said, the red on the vision map
indicates commercial type development and would also include the most intense land
uses this area would see.
Another key component of this proposed Vision Plan Map is the buffering of the
neighborhoods from commercial usage with lower intensity Neighborhood Centers (in
pink) intended for neighborhood scale commercial development and higher density
residential development. This higher intensity residential development could come in the
form of townhomes, duplexes, multi-family dwellings, twin homes, retirement centers, or
assisted living facilities to name a few of the housing choices. Back to our population
who will be nearing retirement age in the next 20-25 years (some sooner); these folks
probably like the neighborhood they live in and in some cases will not be able to
maintain and keep up with a traditional yard and single-family house; others may be
able to, but simply will not want to any longer. Now is the time to plan for this before it is
too late. Higher density residential development is of an appropriately scaled density to
work as a buffer from the single family residences present in this area into the
commercial uses and busier roadways. This type of buffer is only a suggestion, but
would be one that would work rather well in the Neighborhood Center or Transitional (in
brown) envisioned areas.
Currently, there are Heavy Commercial and General Commercial Zoning Districts
abutting directly to Single-Family Residentially Zoned properties. At the time being, this
has worked in some cases, but in the past outdoor storage of unlimited quantity was
separated from these residences with only a privacy fence as a buffer. A privacy fence
is a PART of a buffering strategy, but is certainly not the entire buffer. A strategy of uses
and zoning districts working together will promote protection of property values and
keep neighborhoods isolated and quiet, which is exactly what they have been intended
for. The Transitional envisioned areas have been located around the areas where the
highest intensity uses would conceivably be allowed through this proposed amendment
(bear in mind, no buffer is currently in existence or planned for at this moment in time).
Transitional areas have a unique goal in the sense of the comprehensive plan; one
being a transition from a more intensive area or zoning to that of a less intensive land
use or zoning; two, being a buffering land usage to help isolate. Goal Two of the
Transitional Areas section of the Comprehensive Plan states:
"Transition Areas should be used to graduate density and intensity of
activity to maintain connectivity (to commercial areas), improve pedestrian
experience, and provide areas for increased housing and nonresidential
options not currently being met."
With the population characteristics this area has, coupled with the existing land use
patterns observed in the field, transitional usage is something that is lacking in this area
in general. There is a stark contrast in land uses in terms of intensity of uses. Heavy
intensity commercial areas may be appropriate in this area and necessary in the future,
however industrial certainly is not appropriate in this area under any circumstance. The
proposed Vision Plan map allows for some higher intensity commercial activities and
more importantly provides opportunities to diversify both housing and commercial
options in the area. Transitional areas also can function as lower intensity commercial

zoning providing a buffer and transition from that of a higher commercial zoning or
intensity.
Zoning decisions in the future will be based upon this map in accordance with state law
and as such, it is extremely important to get them right. Mistakes in zoning can take
decades to correct and even then the damage has already been done to the community
and surrounding property owners through devaluation of property and disinvestment in
property. This leads to a loss in tax base as properties fall into disrepair and
abandonment, this trend also pushes development further and further outside of the
City. The proposed amendment will allow this area to grow sustainably for the current
term and the future; this amendment works for current commercial property owners and
even gives those property owners surrounding the commercial developments many
options to develop their property for the first time. Most importantly, the character and
quietness of existing residential developments can be protected in the short term and in
the future. A lot of this area has room for infill development through subdivisions of
property, but there are still opportunities for first time development of a properties that
currently sit vacant. As such, it is paramount that this Vision Plan match the desires and
goals of the community before the development begins in the first place. Staff finds that
if this proposal is approved that development will occur in a sustainable and responsible
manner both now and in the future, something paramount in this neighborhood as with
any other in the community. For all of these reasons, staff recommends approving the
proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan's Vision Plan Map.
Attachments: Summary table of land uses observed in study area;
Current Vision Plan Map of the area;
Current land use map of the area;
Proposed Vision Plan Map;
Map showing Census Data Blocks;
Census Demographic Data for the area; and
Draft minute excerpt from the August 19, 2013 Planning
Commission Meeting.
Presentation: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner

Total Parcels % Parcels Land Area (acres) % Land Area
Vacant Land Residential (VLR) 89 35.60% 102.35 36.44%
Low Density residential (LDR) 81 32.40% 112.6 40.09%
Higher Density Residential (HDR) 67 26.80% 28.4 10.11%
Non-neighborhood Commercial (NNC) 7 2.80% 26.7 9.51%
Neighborhood Serving Commercial (NSC) 4 1.60% 3.78 1.35%
Vacant Land Commercial (VLC) 2 0.80% 7.05 2.51%
Total 250 100.00% 280.88 100.00%

Block 5000, Block 5001, Block 5006, Block 5007, Block 5008, Block 5009, Block 5017, Total
59 33 17 5 9 13 18 283
35 20 8 4 5 9 11 155
2 0 1 0 0 0 0 8
2 0 1 0 0 0 1 7
6 4 1 0 0 0 3 22
5 1 1 0 0 0 1 11
4 1 1 1 1 1 0 11
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5
1 2 1 0 1 0 1 9
2 1 0 0 0 0 0 7
2 4 0 1 0 0 1 13
2 2 0 0 1 1 0 8
1 1 0 0 0 1 1 8
0 0 1 0 0 1 1 8
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3
1 1 0 0 1 1 0 6
1 1 1 0 0 1 1 7
1 0 0 0 0 1 0 6
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
24 13 9 1 4 4 7 128
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6
3 2 0 0 0 0 0 10
0 2 1 0 1 0 0 8
2 1 2 0 0 1 0 8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 9
3 1 0 0 0 0 0 7
4 0 1 0 1 1 0 9
1 2 1 1 0 1 4 14
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5
1 2 1 0 0 0 0 11
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0 1 0 0 5
0 0 1 0 0 1 1 4
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 4
P12: SEX BY AGE - Universe: Total
2010 Census Summary File 1
Block 1013,
Total: 129
Male: 63
Under 5 years 5
5 to 9 years 3
10 to 14 years 8
15 to 17 years 3
18 and 19 years 2
20 years 0
21 years 1
22 to 24 years 0
25 to 29 years 3
30 to 34 years 3
35 to 39 years 4
40 to 44 years 5
45 to 49 years 2
50 to 54 years 4
55 to 59 years 5
60 and 61 years 0
62 to 64 years 3
65 and 66 years 2
67 to 69 years 1
70 to 74 years 2
75 to 79 years 2
80 to 84 years 4
85 years and over 1
Female: 66
Under 5 years 4
5 to 9 years 5
10 to 14 years 4
15 to 17 years 2
18 and 19 years 2
20 years 1
21 years 0
22 to 24 years 1
25 to 29 years 3
30 to 34 years 6
35 to 39 years 3
40 to 44 years 2
45 to 49 years 4
50 to 54 years 4
55 to 59 years 7
60 and 61 years 3
62 to 64 years 3
65 and 66 years 0
67 to 69 years 2
70 to 74 years 1
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010
75 to 79 years 2
80 to 84 years 5
85 years and over 2

Block 5000, Block 5001, Block 5006, Block 5007, Block 5008, Block 5009, Block 5017,
32.5 38.5 19.5 43.5 48.5 52.5 44.5
19.3 39 17.5 32.5 48.5 55.5 25.5
41 38.5 30.5 46.5 54.5 44 48.8
P13: MEDIAN AGE BY SEX - Universe:
Block 1013,
Median age --
Both sexes 41.3
Male 39.5
Female 44.5

Block 5000, Block 5001, Block 5006, Block 5007, Block 5008, Block 5009, Block 5017, Totals
59 33 17 5 9 13 18 283
57 32 17 5 9 13 18 277
47 25 13 0 9 13 16 228
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 6 3 5 0 0 2 44
2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P1: RACE - Universe: Total population
2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public
Block 1013,
Total: 129
Population of one race: 126
White alone 105
Black or African American alone 0
American Indian and Alaska Native 3
Asian alone 0
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific 0
Some Other Race alone 18
Two or More Races: 3
Population of two races: 3
White; Black or African American 0
White; American Indian and Alaska 2
White; Asian 0
White; Native Hawaiian and Other 0
White; Some Other Race 1
Black or African American; American 0
Black or African American; Asian 0
Black or African American; Native 0
Black or African American; Some 0
American Indian and Alaska Native; 0
Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other 0
Asian; Some Other Race 0
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific 0

Block 5000, Block 5001, Block 5006, Block 5007, Block 5008, Block 5009, Block 5017, Totals
18 12 6 2 4 7 6 103
13 5 5 1 3 7 5 80
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 1 0 0 0 0 6
2 1 0 1 0 0 0 10
2 1 1 0 0 2 3 15
0 1 2 0 0 1 1 12
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
2 1 0 0 2 2 0 10
2 1 1 0 0 2 1 16
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
5 7 1 1 1 0 1 23
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
2 3 1 0 0 0 1 9
1 3 0 0 1 0 0 7
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Householder 75 to 84 years 0
Householder 85 years and over 1
Householder 85 years and over 2
Renter occupied: 7
Owner occupied: 41
H17: TENURE BY AGE OF
Block 1013,
Total: 48

59 33 17 5 9 13 18 283
26 10 9 4 1 7 4 123
18 10 3 0 3 6 13 99
15 13 5 1 5 0 1 61
H11: TOTAL POPULATION IN
Block 1013,
Total population in occupied housing 129
Owned with a mortgage or a loan 62
Owned free and clear 46
Renter occupied 21

59 33 17 5 9 13 18 283
59 33 17 5 9 13 18 283
53 30 15 4 7 9 15 240
14 9 4 1 2 3 4 67
11 4 1 1 2 3 3 42
3 5 3 0 0 0 1 25
11 1 2 1 1 3 2 37
18 12 9 2 2 3 5 83
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
5 3 0 0 0 0 0 20
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 1 0 3 7
1 2 0 0 1 0 1 10
6 3 2 1 2 4 3 43
3 3 1 1 1 4 1 22
2 3 1 1 1 4 1 20
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 14
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 11
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3
2 0 0 0 0 0 1 7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P29: HOUSEHOLD TYPE BY
Block 1013,
Total: 129
In households: 129
In family households: 107
Householder: 30
Male 17
Female 13
Spouse 16
Biological child 32
Adopted child 0
Stepchild 5
Grandchild 12
Brother or sister 2
Parent 0
Parent-in-law 0
Son-in-law or daughter-in-law 2
Other relatives 3
Nonrelatives 5
In nonfamily households: 22
Male householder: 8
Living alone 7
Not living alone 1
Female householder: 10
Living alone 8
Not living alone 2
Nonrelatives 4
In group quarters: 0
Institutionalized population 0
Noninstitutionalized population 0

Block 5000, Block 5001, Block 5006, Block 5007, Block 5008, Block 5009, Block 5017,
3.28 2.75 2.83 2.5 2.25 1.86 3
3.38 4 2.4 4 1.33 1.86 3.4
3 1.86 5 1 5 0 1
Total 2.69
Owner occupied 2.63
Renter occupied 3
H12: AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE OF
Block 1013,
Average household size --

18 12 6 2 4 7 6 103
14 9 4 1 2 3 4 67
11 1 2 1 1 3 2 37
3 8 2 0 1 0 2 30
1 3 0 0 1 0 1 10
2 5 2 0 0 0 1 20
4 3 2 1 2 4 2 36
3 3 2 1 2 4 1 31
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5
P18: HOUSEHOLD TYPE - Universe:
Block 1013,
Total: 48
Family households: 30
Husband-wife family 16
Other family: 14
Male householder, no wife present 4
Female householder, no husband 10
Nonfamily households: 18
Householder living alone 15
Householder not living alone 3
NOTE: A household that has at least one
member of the household related to the
householder by birth, marriage, or
adoption is a "Family household." Same-
sex couple households are included in the
family households category if there is at
least one additional person related to the
householder by birth or adoption. Same-
sex couple households with no relatives of
the householder present are tabulated in
nonfamily households. Responses of
"same-sex spouse" were edited during
processing to "unmarried partner."
"Nonfamily households" consist of people
living alone and households which do not
have any members related to the

20 13 6 2 4 8 7 115
18 12 6 2 4 7 6 103
2 1 0 0 0 1 1 12
Total: 55
Occupied 48
Vacant 7
H3: OCCUPANCY STATUS - Universe:
Block 1013,

IX. Discussion and possible action to amend portions of the Vision Plan
Component of the 2009 update to the San Angelo Comprehensive Plan,
specifically Properties located within an approximately 1,800 foot radius of the
intersection of Armstrong Street and 28th Street in north-central San Angelo.
Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner, came forward to present this item. This item was
requested by a property owner within the study area. No notification was required
for this request as a Vision Map Amendment does not re-zone anyone's property.
Mr. Hintz discussed the characteristics of the area and explained the process that
was taken by staff to study and research the area. The area is home to several
commercial entities at this time including a warehouse, television studios, and a
TXDot office and warehouse. General rationale for the amendment was presented
as to why certain envisioned areas were placed onto the map as well.
Some general discussion about what types of land uses were appropriate in each
envisioned area, and would be appropriate given the surroundings of the area.
No one came forward to speak in favor or in opposition of the amendment to the
Vision Plan Map.
Motion to approve as presented was made by Sammy Farmer and seconded by
Mark Crisp. The motion passed 5-0.

City of San Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: August 20, 2013
Subject: Vision Plan - Proposed Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for
the following area of the City:
Location: Properties located south from the intersection of Grand Canal Road
and US Highway 277, south to the City Limit Line, and properties
located just east of the City Limits line, but outside the City Limits
in southern San Angelo. Please see attached maps on this report
for a more detailed description.
Purpose: Approval or modification of this request will forward that
recommendation to City Council for a final decision on the matter.
Contacts: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner - and- 657-4210
AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services
Caption: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO VISION PLAN COMPONENT
OF THE SAN ANGELO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
ADOPTED IN 2009, SPECIFICALLY PROPERTIES LOCATED
SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF GRAND CANAL ROAD
AND US HIGHWAY 277, SOUTH TO THE CITY LIMIT LINE, AND
PROPERTIES LOCATED JUST EAST OF THE CITY LIMITS LINE,
BUT OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS IN SOUTHERN SAN ANGELO.
Approve the proposed Vision Plan map amendments as presented;
Remand the Vision Plan map back to Planning Commission for further
discussion; or

Deny the proposed Vision Plan Map Amendment in its entirety or on a
property by property basis.
Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed Vision
Plan Map Amendment.
At the July 15 Planning Commission Meeting, the proposal was recommended for
approval by a vote of 6-0.
This majority of this area was annexed to the city limits in 1997. At that time, many of
the uses in place included heavier commercial and lighter industrial types. Since that
time, neighborhood type development has occurred behind these developments and
south of Grand Canal Road.
This proposed amendment was passed partially by the Council at the May 14th meeting
with the remainder of the area being remanded to the Planning Commission for further
discussion and future submittal of an alternate proposal to the Council at a future date.
At the June 17 Planning Commission meeting, staff was directed to come up with a
proposal that was more compatible and less of a change than that of the original
amendment. The final map in this report illustrates this revised proposal as a result of
discussions with the Planning Commission and City Council.
Analysis:
The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.
This area, prior to annexation in 1997, was home to more sprawling, but higher intensity
land uses; several of these land uses and the structures associated with them are still
present to this day. As early 1999, the properties south of Grand Canal Road were
subdivided; the area near the intersection for Templin Court and Grand Canal Road was
established around 2000. In later years, this residential development continued to the
north and east along Grand Canal Road and in 2005, a re-subdivision of this area
created Clarice Court. Upon examination of the area, nearly all of these lots have been
filled by single family homes, with the exceptions being a couple of lots closest to the
industrial and heavier commercial development.
This area is home to uses at opposite ends of the land use spectrum that result in some
incompatibilities. Generally speaking, residential areas are more successful when
isolated from higher-intensity land uses allowed in industrial type zoning. This isn't to
say the two designations cannot work in close proximity to one another, but the
Comprehensive Plan seeks to buffer these types of land uses with some intermediate
zoning designation and land use. In the case of this general region, that bridge or
buffering area is not in place. Given that these juxtapositions of land uses occur, it
would be prudent for this area to be re-envisioned now so that development in the future
can be harmonious with what is present now.

Staff does realize that the industrial areas with higher intensities of land uses were in
place prior to the development of this residential neighborhood. As such, it would be
highly advantageous to now establish nodes of industrial and commercial areas so that
the long term benefit and enjoyment of properties within this area will continue well into
the future. Several of the goals within the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan is
to create predictable land use patterns and consistent development throughout the
community for residential, commercial, industrial and other properties. By allowing no
transition or "step-down" area from higher-intensity uses into much lower-intensity
residential uses, the predictability of future developments is compromised. Developers
Clearly, the stark contrast in place now between these land uses (at extreme opposites
of the land use spectrum) does not lend itself to predictability; the proper way to build in
and create it is an amendment to the Vision Plan Map within the Comprehensive Plan.
It should also be pointed out that this proposed amendment is a vision of the future and
does not actually rezone property. However, if the present development patterns of this
residential area continue, some commercial opportunities or mixed use opportunities
may present themselves in the future. Industrial areas (as currently visioned) do not
allow for either of these to occur without an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. By
addressing these realities now, future owners, developers, and investors in property will
be afforded opportunities to diversify the development in the area. As areas become
more diverse, people are able to meet daily needs within walking distance, factories and
businesses are able to have workers who live nearby, and commercial enterprises are
located much closer to their customer bases. Locating and excluding land uses from
one another does not necessarily lead to successful long-term sustainability. Having
large pockets and strips of commercial areas creates traffic congestion; if these areas
are not spread out in proportion to the population base of the community, areas of town
become congested at certain times while other areas go underutilized and eventually
developers and property owners become disconnected from that area; over time the
area becomes forgotten and eventually, disinvestment occurs.
By addressing this issue now, diversification may occur and new development
opportunities can be realized before it becomes too late. As industrial and commercial
trends change, the highest and best use of the land also changes. Having exclusively
one type of envisioned development can lead to negative consequences for an area. By
providing for a wide range of uses, the area can re-invent itself while still retaining the
predictability and consistency of development everyone in the community seeks.
Diversification allows areas to feed off of one another, creating synergy that maintains
activity - and thus, business - on a long-term basis.
Regarding the proposed changes to the Vision Plan map: the most noticeable one is
that the large swath of land area currently envisioned as "Industrial", directly adjacent to
the neighborhood areas, has been removed and replaced with other more compatible
use types. Staff has found that "Transitional" areas - shown as brown on the proposed
Vision Plan map excerpt - will be much more compatible with the existing neighborhood
both now and in the future. These transitional areas will allow for development
opportunities that are at a more appropriate intensity and density for the adjacent
properties, and which factor in the street network and its capabilities. "Transitional"
areas in this sense could potentially allow for intermediate uses such as offices, self

service storage warehouses, and higher-density residential opportunities to name but a
few.
The second change is the large, dark green parcel located north of Grand Canal Road.
Currently envisioned for neighborhood development, this parcel is federally owned and
contains a drainage area that would likely not be developed in the future. By preserving
this area now as open space, it allows some predictability for neighbors both north and
south of the canal some assurances that the area is not anticipated for development. It
is also a more accurate representation of the property itself, and helps meet the
suggestions from the Comprehensive Plan that encourage every neighborhood to be
close to types of green space - which can include areas that are not necessarily limited
to parks. Just south of the intersection of Grand Canal Road and Templin Court
another parcel has been identified as open space; this area is a low spot where
drainage currently flows, preserving this as open space in the future will also greatly
benefit this area.
Two other changes occur at the core of the residential area; a "Neighborhood Center"
indicated in pink has been added, and the "Industrial" development at western edge of
the city limits (surrounded by current and future envisioned areas of "Neighborhood"
development) has been replaced with a "Neighborhood" development designation. This
"Neighborhood Center" is intended for lower-intensity commercial enterprises that,
generally speaking, will serve the neighborhood without the full intensity of development
that commercial areas allow. In addition, higher-density residential opportunities are
also encouraged within "Neighborhood Centers". Generally speaking, "Neighborhood
Centers" should be located at nodes on key intersections; in this case, when factoring in
traffic patterns and accessibility, this particular parcel is readily and easily accessible to
the established neighborhoods without having to access Highway 277. As such, the
"Neighborhood Center" located south of the existing city limits line has been replaced
with rural envisioned development.
East of Highway 277, a large strip of commercial development was envisioned for the
future. In analyzing this area, several parcels currently sit vacant or underutilized at this
time that already have commercial zoning designations. Given the isolation and lack of
thru streets to these properties, coupled with the fact that vacant commercially-zoned
properties exist north and east of this study area, and within the study area, more
commercial envisioned development is not necessary for the area at this time. In the
future, changed conditions may require that this area be looked at again, but for the
time being the balance of commercial properties in this area is more than the area
needs for the foreseeable future.
Commercial areas have been located between industrial properties in such a way that
the commercial properties are adjacent to neighborhoods and transitional areas for the
most part. The transition from industrial, into commercial or transitional, and finally into
neighborhoods is something that is highly recommended within the Comprehensive
Plan and by Planning staff. The transitions - if established in this order - are logical and
predictable, and if followed, will lead to predictable development that all property owners
can enjoy both now and in the future. By creating buffer zones and transitions between
industrial areas, they will be allowed to flourish without being a detriment to the
neighboring, less intensely used properties. By adding in some commercial areas that
will serve as a buffer to the neighboring residential uses, more diverse opportunities

may exist which will benefit all residents of the area and the community as a whole.
Presently, this area is all envisioned for industrial development which would not allow
for neighborhood serving businesses or general retail establishments. Given the
growing and established neighborhoods in this area, not capitalizing on this opportunity
to introduce these types of developments now, before it gets to be too late would be a
mistake. These commercially-envisioned areas are located in highly visible areas and
will allow for the highest and best uses of these properties without being a detriment to
the function of the roadways, traffic patterns, and land use patterns now or in the future.
Attachments: Current Vision Plan Map of the area;
Originally proposed Vision Plan map of the area which was
remanded back to Planning Commission;
Thoroughfare Plan map of the area;
Revised Vision Plan Map of the area as resulting from
discussion with Planning Commission and City Council;
July 15 draft Planning Commission Minutes;
June 17 Planning Commission Minutes;
May 14 City Council Minutes; and
April 15 Planning Commission Minutes.

IX. Discussion and possible action to amend portions of the Vision Plan
Component of the 2009 update to the San Angelo Comprehensive Plan, as
remanded to Planning Commission by the City Council regarding the following
amendment previously approved by the Planning Commission:
Properties located south from the intersection of Grand Canal Road and US
Highway 277, south to the City Limit Line, and properties located just east of the City
Limits line, but outside the City Limits in southern San Angelo.
Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner came forth to speak on proposed changes to the
original proposed Plan presented and remanded back by City Council. The area is
located along Grand Canal Road in southeast San Angelo. The original proposed
Plan incorporates buffers between residential and industrial zones as well as
relocating the proposed Neighborhood Center, in an area south of Grand Canal
Road. Transition designation was used as buffers – which could in this instance
allow for CN, CO and CG zoning and which could possibly allow for increased
density, residential development or neighborhood scale compatible commercial
development. The drainage canal is being proposed for Open Space, since the area
is un-buildable and serves as open space now and likely will continue to do so in the
future.
Mr. Wynne was in favor of the current Vision Plan that exists, and was partially
amended by the City Council as a result of a recent zone change in the area. Mr.
Wynne expressed concern for an area that is being proposed for ‘Commercial’, but is
industrial in nature, with the possible plans for expansion.
Mr. Smith stated that the designation will not affect the current zoning and the uses
allowed in the district. Mr. Hintz elaborated on this point and stated that this is a
Vision Plan for the next 25-50 years; this process does not change anyone's zoning,
nor does it require anyone to apply for a zone change.
Mr. Hintz mentioned that the proponents are able to make the request for a zone
change – but staff and the Planning Commission are legally required to use the
Vision Plan as a central component in making a recommendation to the City Council,
who in turn is also guided by this document, when making zoning decisions.
Ms. Jackson asked about the existing uses for the area being proposed for
Transitional. Mr. Wynne stated that there are some houses and warehouses in this
area. Mr. Hintz stated that the transitional areas were currently occupied by a
residence, contractor, and the other was vacant at this time. Mr. Smith believed
some of these areas might be a good place to develop townhouses or other higher
density residential projects.
Some discussion about the order of the maps in the report took place and Mr. Hintz
apologized for the titling mishap, but clarified which map that was presented
contained the proposed request by staff as directed at the last Planning Commission
meeting.
Motion to approve was made by Ryan Smith and seconded by Valerie Priess and
passed 6-0.

B: Properties located south from the intersection of Grand Canal Road and US Highway
277, south to the City Limit Line, and properties located just east of the City Limits
line, but outside the City Limits in southern San Angelo.
Mr. Hintz explained the history of what was proposed and went through how it is
different as presented. A portion of this amendment was approved by the City
Council, however the remainder was remanded to the Planning Commission for
more discussion. More transitional envisioned areas were put into place with an
enlarged commercial use; the commercial uses were added in places where
industrial envisioned use was directly adjacent to neighborhood envisioned uses.
City Council had directed staff and the Planning Commission to work to find a Vision
that was a bit more in line with some of the current uses of property that was less
drastic of a change as presented at the time.
Mr. Wynne didn’t see the box factory of being neighborhood center in the future, and
anticipated several other industrial uses to be present for some time. Mr. Lawrence
explained the rationale behind the area not being a neighborhood any longer due to
heavy emphasis on industrial uses.
Joe Grimes made a motion for staff to come up with a compromise on the current
amendment presented today and what Council was looking for in this particular area.
Valerie Priess seconded this motion, which passed 5-0.

Minutes
Vol. 104 May 14, 2013
Z 13-13: David and Pam Hilton
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF
SANANGELO,TEXAS,WHICHSAIDEXHIBIT“A”OFCHAPTER12ADOPTSZONINGREGULATIONS,
USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 525
Preusser Street, located at the southwest corner of Preusser Street and North Poe Street. This property specifically
occupies the Ellis Addition Block 4, N 115' of Lots 1 & 2 and E 33.5' of Frary Addition, Block 19, Lot 6, in central
San Angelo, adding the zoning classification of Historic Overlay (HO) District; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver presented background information. A copy of the
presentation is part of the Permanent Supplement Record.
General discussion was held on the L-shaped lot, staff’s explanation noting the historic designation is applied
by the tax parcel, and that such designation only applies to the structure.
Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Silvas and seconded by
Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously.
DIRECTION TO STAFF TO REMAND THE AMENDMENT TO VISION PLAN COMPONENT OF THE
SAN ANGELO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ADOPTED IN 2009, SPECIFICALLY PROPERTIES
STARTING APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST FROM THE INTERSECTION OF LOOP 306 AND
BAZE STREET, THENCE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION TO FM 2105, AND EASTERLY THROUGH
THE CITY LANDFILL AND ENCOMPASSING PROPERTIES ANNEXED TO THE CITY LIMITS IN
DECEMBER OF 2011, AND CITY OWNED PROPERTIES EAST OF NORTH US HIGHWAY 67 NORTH
AND EAST OF THE CURRENT INDUSTRIAL PARK IN THE FAR NORTHEAST PORTION OF SAN
ANGELO
Interim Senior Planner Jeff Hintz presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the
Permanent Supplement Record.
General discussion was held on the types of zoning classifications, allowable uses within the classifications,
the need to provide flexibility to the owners by designating the entire area industrial, and the necessary
notification requirements should the classifications change.
Motion, to remand the amendment to the Planning Commission, particularly to further review the commercial
designation within the proposed area, was made by Councilmember Morrison and seconded by
Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN COMPONENT OF SAN
ANGELO'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, SPECIFICALLY PLANNED PROJECTIONS OF SMITH
BOULEVARD AND PAULANN BOULEVARD AND OTHER PLANNED THOROUGHFARES IN
NORTHEAST SAN ANGELO
General discussion was held on the future planned roads and future connectivity.
Motion, to approve the amendment, as presented, was made by Councilmember Morrison and seconded by
Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED PROPOSAL TO VISION PLAN COMPONENT OF THE SAN ANGELO
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ADOPTED IN 2009, SPECIFICALLY PROPERTIES LOCATED
SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF GRAND CANAL ROAD AND US HIGHWAY 277, SOUTH TO
THE CITY LIMIT LINE, AND PROPERTIES LOCATED JUST EAST OF THE CITY LIMITS LINE, BUT
OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS IN SOUTHERN SAN ANGELO; AND, DIRECT TO STAFF TO REMAND

Minutes Page 511
May 14, 2013 Vol. 104
THE REMAINING PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER
REVIEW
General discussion was held on the impact to existing businesses,
Motion, to accept, as presented, was made by Councilmember Alexander. Motion failed due to the lack of a
second.
Motion, to approve proposed the changes bounded by Clarice Court , north grand canal road to east of 277,
including Grand Canal Point Addition Tracts 1,2,3,4 and Sunset Ranch Estates , Lot 17, as presented; and,
remanding the remaining proposed changes to the Planning Commission, was made by Councilmember
Hirschfeld and seconded by Councilmember Farmer.
Further discussion was held on the future development of housing located next to commercial zoned
properties, conditional uses, allowable uses within the various zones, protecting the future development for the
existing property owners, future property uses, and correcting those with non-compliance zone uses.
A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously.
FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12,
EXHIBIT “A” (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO
PD 13-02: Luke Burnett
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY
OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING
REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT 1245 Grand Canal Road, located approximately 500 feet east of the
intersection of Grand Canal Road and Clarice Court. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second
Replat of Sunset Ranch Estates, Section Two, Block Two, Lot 17B in southern San Angelo, changing the
zoning classification from Office Warehouse (OW) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Alexander and seconded by
Councilmember Morrison. Motion carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER #15 TO INCLUDE THE REPAIR OF THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
WEST OF ABE STREET UNDER THE AGREEMENT WITH TEMPLETON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.,
CONSTRUCTION MANGER AT RISK, FOR THE CONCHO RIVER & PARKS REHABILITATION
PROJECT PK-05-10 IN THE AMOUNT OF $167,128.00, AND REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR SAID
AMOUNT TO BE FUNDED IN EQUAL PARTS BY RIVER PROJECT CONTINGENCY FUNDS AND
THE CITY SELF-INSURANCE FUND; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
SAID CHANGE ORDER
Parks and Recreation Director Carl White presented background information. A copy of the presentation is
part of the Permanent Supplement Record.
Motion, to approve the change order, as presented, was made by Councilmember Morrison and seconded by
Councilmember Silvas.
General discussion was held on whether to repair or rebuild the bridge, and the cost differential.
A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously.

VII. Discussion and possible action to amend portions of the Vision Plan
Component of the 2009 update to the San Angelo Comprehensive Plan,
specifically properties located south from the intersection of Grand Canal
Road and US Highway 277, south to the City Limit Line, and properties located
just east of the City Limits line, but outside the City Limits in southern San
Angelo.
Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner came forward to present this request. Staff
recommends approving amendments to the Vision Plan. He explained how the
industrial uses could be buffered away from the area, and that industrial uses had
already existed in the area. He showed a drainage area on the map and explained
an intersection that was problematic, discussing how TXDot had already been
apprised of accidents that had occurred there and was aware of the problem. Mr.
Grimes questioned the neighborhood center section of the proposed amendment.
Mr. Hintz explained that it would better serve the current neighborhood, however, the
current proposal did not provide ease of accessibility and also that traffic problems
could arise due to the intersection. The current Vision Plan shows the area as
industrial. Luke Burnett spoke in favor of the Vision Plan amendment. He explained
how he approached the City about buying a lot in the area; lot 17. He explained how
he wanted to buy the property and fabricate steel buildings in the area, that the steel
supplier was nearby, with easy access to the highways. He understood that a zone
change could not be recommended by staff without it meshing with the Vision Plan.
He explained what his intentions for the area is, which will be discussed in the
upcoming case at this meeting (PD13-02: Luke Burnett). No opposition was
presented. Mr. Grimes made a motion to approve the staff recommended changes,
Mr. Smith seconded it. Motion passed unanimously, 6-0.

City of San
Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: August 6, 2013
Subject: An ordinance amending the Mobile Home Skirting
Regulations for commercial properties selling mobile and
manufactured homes.
Purpose: Adoption of this ordinance will change skirting requirements
for commercial properties with manufactured homes for sale.
This ordinance also updates terminology referring to these
types of dwelling units by adding the term Manufactured
Home.
Contacts: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services &
Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner 325-657-4210
Caption: FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 ENTITLED
“PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT”, ARTICLE 12.500
ENTITLED “MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS”, BY
AMENDING ARTICLE’S TITLE TO READ,
“MANUFACTURED HOME AND MOBILE HOME
REGULATIONS”; REPEALING SUB-SECTION 12.503
ENTITLED “SKIRTING”, ENACTING A NEW SUB-SECTION
12.503 ENTITLED “SKIRTING” AND ADDING SUB-
SECTION 12.503(a) AND SUB-SECTION 12.503(b);
RENAMING 12.504 ENTITLED “TEMPORARY MOBILE
HOME INSTALLATION”, TO “TEMPORARY
MANUFACTURED HOME, MOBILE HOME OR BUILDING
INSTALLATION”, ADDING REFERENCE TO
“MANUFACTURED HOME” IN SUB-SECTION 12.504(a)
AND SUB-SECTION 12.504(c), OF THE SAN ANGELO
CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

1) Approve the Amendment; or
2) Modify and approve the Amendment; or
3) Deny the Amendment.
Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed
amendment to the Mobile Home Skirting Regulations and Terminology.
In November of 2011 the Planning Commission heard and approved with
conditions case CU 11-16. During this presentation there was some discussion
regarding the skirting of mobile or manufactured housing units. The way the
ordinance is currently written, all mobile and manufactured homes regardless of
the zoning classification they are in, are required be skirted if in place for over
120 days. This would include any dealership selling or displaying these types of
homes for perspective buyers. As a result of this discussion with the Planning
Commission members, staff has added a clause exempting Mobile and
Manufactured Home dealers from this skirting requirement.
Skirting is required on mobile homes to ensure consistent development patterns
and consistent appearance within San Angelo's neighborhoods. Un-skirted
mobile homes appear out of character and stand out in a neighborhood. In
addition, leaving the housing unit un-skirted allows for easy access to the
underside of the structure by rodents, pests, and other creatures. These types of
creatures have a tendency to chew on wires, pipes, and generally speaking do
not belong living beneath someone's housing unit. Skirting is essential in helping
to keep these creatures away from the underside of manufactured or mobile
residential units; in a commercial or industrial trade area this is less of a concern
as these homes are for sale and display and not intended or allowed to be lived
in under any circumstance.
Being forced to skirt homes that are not intended for residential use places an
unnecessary hardship on dealers and businesses selling these homes in staff's
findings. If the homes are for sale and display at a licensed mobile home
dealership, neighborhood character is much less of an issue. Manufactured
Home dealerships are classified in the Zoning Ordinance as "Wholesale Trade"
and this type of use is allowed in the more intensive commercial and any
industrial zoning designations. Placement of this type of land use adjacent to a
neighborhood would require a zoning district that is not compatible with the
neighborhood and surrounding land uses and is not likely to be recommended by
Planning staff. 315.G.4.b of the Zoning Ordinance specifically states that the
sales of manufactured homes are classified as wholesale trade, not retail sales

and service. This assures that this type of land use will only occur in the more
intensive commercial areas and any industrial area within the City Limits. As
such the visual impacts of not skirting a manufactured home for sale will not be
felt by residential neighborhoods generally speaking.
Attachments: minute excerpt from November 2011 Planning
Commission;
draft ordinance with changes highlighted in red.

IV. Request for approval of Conditional Use. [Planning Commission makes final
decision; appeals may be directed to City Council.]
A. CU 11-16: Lucky Seven Enterprises
a request for approval of a Conditional Use to allow Wholesale Trade in a General
Commercial (CG) zoning district, on the following property:
4100 Ben Ficklin Road, a 3.17 acre parcel situated between Lancer Lane & Ben
Ficklin Road, and located roughly 270 feet east from the intersection of Mobile Park
Drive and Lancer Lane, out of the South Concho Mobile Home Park, Tract 2, in south
central San Angelo.
Jesus Vazquez, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the
staff recommendation of approval. Five notifications were sent out, with 2 returned in
favor and 1 returned in opposition. The subject property is surrounded by CH,
CG/CH, and OW to the north and east. To the west and south is RM-1 and RS-1
zoning. A current mobile home park exists to the west of the site and an RV sales
use is to the north. The Vision Map component of the Comprehensive Plan calls for
‘commercial’ at this location. The property is currently vacant and undeveloped. Mr.
Vazquez reviewed the possible actions on this case. The site does provide an ease
of access to the nearby thoroughfare of South Bryant Boulevard. In addition, the
wholesale use is consistent with the ‘commercial’ called for at this location. The
notification returned in opposition had a concern with the traffic being send northward
down South Bryant as there is an existing “blind spot” for traffic at the intersection of
Ben Ficklin road. Ben Jenkins asked a question about the requirement in the City
Ordinance that mobile or manufactured homes be skirted if left in place for a particular
period of time. Staff responded that this requirement is a requirement not of the
Zoning Ordinance, but of the general City Ordinance, and was re-iterated within the
staff report to make the proponent aware. Joe Grimes asked about the proximity to
the residential zoning to the south. Staff explained that the commercial zoning exists
today at this location; while not ideal, the nature of this request does not allow for a
removal of that zoning designation; however, the chance to hear a Conditional Use
request allows the Commission to place any conditions as it deems necessary to
make the use more appropriate at that location. Ben Jenkins also asked about the
need for curbing. Staff responded that, in situations where subdivisions are required,
curbing is generally a requirement of street improvements; however, in the case of a
Conditional Use, it is often considered on a case-by-case basis. Particularly if the site
is already laid out and buildings in place, there are entry and exit points that are
articulated. In this case, it is certainly a possibility – however, because the land is
vacant and undeveloped, there is not ultimately knowledge of how the site will
develop. Bill Lawrence asked if mobile or manufactured homes could be built or
assembled on site, and staff clarified that they could not; this would constitute a
manufacturing use which is not allowed in the CG zoning district. Construction work
requiring a permit would also not be allowed on the site as it is currently zoned.
No one came forward to speak in favor or in opposition to the request.
The Commission asked questions about the safeguards in place to prevent
individuals for living in these structures. Staff explained the requirement for privacy
fence as it is written in the ordinance.

Bill Lawrence asked the proponent, Clint Hemby, if the venture would be for new or
used mobile or manufactured homes. The proponent indicated that the mobile or
manufactured homes would be new, although they would accept trade-ins. The staff
pulled up the aerial photos and Mr. Hemby indicated that there would be a main entry-
exit point midway along the lot, onto Ben Ficklin Road. Sam Tambunga made the
point that this location would allow these structures to be moved with the utilization of
Loop 306.
Motion, to approve as presented, with the additional condition that curbing be added
along the frontage of the lot, along Ben Ficklin Road, was made by Ben Jenkins and
seconded by Bill Wynne. This curbing may be typical or lay-down curb, with the curb
cut as required by City Ordinance. The motion passed unanimously, 6-0.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 “PLANNING
& DEVELOPMENT”, ARTICLE 12.500 “MOBILE HOME
REGULATIONS”, OF THE SAN ANGELO CODE OF
ORDINANCES BY AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE
12.500 TO READ, “MANUFACTURED HOME AND
MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS”; RESTATING SECTION
12.503 “SKIRTING” BY ADDING MANUFACTURED
HOMES AND PROVIDING AN EXCEPTION FOR
LICENSED DEALERSHIPS AND RETAILERS;
AMENDING SECTION 12.504 “TEMPORARY MOBILE
HOME INSTALLATION” BY AMENDING THE SECTION
TITLE TO “TEMPORARY MANUFACTURED HOME,
MOBILE HOME OR BUILDING INSTALLATION”, AND
RESTATING SUBPARAGRAPHS (a) AND (c) OF SAID
SECTION TO REFERENCE MANUFACTURED HOME;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
Section 1.) THAT, Chapter 12, “Planning & development”, Article 12.500 “Mobile Home
Regulations’ is hereby amended by amending the title of Article 12.500; by
restating section 12.503 “Skirting”, by amending section 12.504 “Temporary
Mobile Home Installation” by amending the Section title and restating
subparagraphs 9a) and (c) of said section, to read as:
ARTICLE 12.500 MANUFACTURED HOME AND MOBILE HOME
REGULATIONS
Sec. 12.503 Skirting
(a) All manufactured homes and mobile homes for use as a dwelling in any
area determined appropriate by the municipality, including a subdivision, planned unit
development, single lot and rental community or park, which have been in place for a
period greater than one hundred twenty (120) days, shall be skirted in accordance with
the official code of the city.
(b) Exception: There is excepted from this provision any manufactured home
or mobile home displayed for sale by a manufactured home or mobile home dealership
and/or retailer licensed under the Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1201 Manufactured
Housing, Section 1201.101, and meeting all City Ordinances, in this instance, no skirting
shall be required.
Sec. 12.504 Temporary Manufactured Home, Mobile Home or Building Installation

(a) A manufactured home, mobile home or building may be temporarily
installed on a site, during the construction or reconstruction of a home or building on the
same site, with permission of the city council.
(c) Any request for installation of a manufactured home, mobile home or
building which would remain for more than one year shall first be heard by the planning
commission after notification of property owners within two hundred feet (200') of the
proposed site. The planning commission shall forward its recommendation to the city
council for final action at a regular meeting of said council.
Section 2.) THAT, the terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable in that if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid,
the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
Section 3.) THAT, the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be subject to a fine as provided for in
Section 1.106 of this Code. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate
offense.
Section 4.) THAT, this Ordinance shall be effective on, from and after the date of adoption.
INTRODUCED on the 6th day of August, 2013, and finally PASSED,
APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the 20th day of August, 2013.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO
ATTEST: BY:
Dwain Morrison, Mayor
By: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form:
AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Lysia H. Bowling
Development Services City Attorney

September 24, 2013 Special Meeting Agenda packet

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (13)

Similar to September 24, 2013 Special Meeting Agenda packet

Similar to September 24, 2013 Special Meeting Agenda packet (20)

More from City of San Angelo Texas

More from City of San Angelo Texas (20)

September 24, 2013 Special Meeting Agenda packet