• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
San angelo city council 11 5-13 -  request for competitive sealed proposals
 

San angelo city council 11 5-13 - request for competitive sealed proposals

on

  • 228 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
228
Views on SlideShare
215
Embed Views
13

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 13

http://www.sanangelotexas.us 13

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    San angelo city council 11 5-13 -  request for competitive sealed proposals San angelo city council 11 5-13 - request for competitive sealed proposals Presentation Transcript

    • City Council October 15, 2013
    • Request For Competitive Sealed Proposals • RFCSP’s allow for selection criteria other than price for construction contracts • May not be used with Federal/State funding • Selection Criteria must be published in the proposal. • Must be advertised for 2 consecutive weeks • Best and Final Offers can be requested • Contract may be negotiated • Negotiations begin with the highest rank respondent
    • RFCSP Documents • RFCSP documents must reflect: • Construction Documents • Weighted Selection Criteria to be used • Estimated Budget • Estimated Completion Date • Other information in order to respond to the request
    • Selection Criteria • Texas Local Government Code criteria • • • • • • Price Quality of Respondents Service Safety Records Proposed Personnel Financial Capability Any other relevant factor • Local Preference Research indicates that criteria varies depending on the city and project requirements
    • Examples • Example 1 • • • • • • • • 35 Points = Price 30 Points = Past Performance 20 Points = Project Management 10 Points = Subcontractors 06 Points = Litigation 05 Points = Relevant Experience 04 Points = Financial Stability 120 Total Points
    • Examples • Example 2 • 70 Points = Price • 15 Points = Local Presence/Experience • 15 Points = Local Area Experience
    • Bid Analysis Non-local Airport Hangar $ 348,574 $ 1,132,000 Civic Events-Barn WU-Red Bluff 2,306,430 WU-East Draw 2,296,201 WU-Water Line 1,344,648 Total $ 7,427,853 $ Local 409,700 $ 1,227,500 2,734,440 3,304,868 1,399,276 9,075,784 $ Increase cost to City $1.6M or 22% Increase cost to City $1.6M or 22% Diff 61,126 95,500 428,010 1,008,667 54,628 1,647,931
    • Recommendations • Staff ‘s preferred approach is to use a balanced methodology that will increase consideration for awarding to local contractors, promote fair/open competition and maximizing budget funds. • Recommendation – Sliding Point Scale Projected Contract Amount % <$500,000 5% <$1.5 Million 4% +$1.5 Million 3%
    • City Council October 15, 2013