March 20, 2012 City Council Agenda Packet w/Addendum
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

March 20, 2012 City Council Agenda Packet w/Addendum

on

  • 1,622 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,622
Views on SlideShare
1,622
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

March 20, 2012 City Council Agenda Packet w/Addendum March 20, 2012 City Council Agenda Packet w/Addendum Document Transcript

  • NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING AN AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS 9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room 500 Rio Concho DriveTHE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTHMAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCEIS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK,ROOM 202, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING.City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. everyday for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting. As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate” Thank You!I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.) A. Call to Order B. Prayer and Pledge "Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible.” C. Proclamations “Welcome Texas State Gymnastics Meet”, May 3, 4, and 5, 2012, to be accepted by Tony Walker, San Angelo ISD Gymnastics Program Director and Head Coach and Ryan Terrill, Senior Gymnast “Primera Church 120th Anniversary Celebration”, April 1, 2012, to be accepted by Johnny Fira, Associate Pastor, and Norma Lee, Children’s Director “San Angelo Safe Digging Month, April 2012”, to be accepted by Craig Thornell, Concho Valley Damage Prevention Acting President, and JimBob Sims, Texas811 Damage Prevention Manager D. Recognitions Ken Landon, National recognition from the National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR), Conservation Committee, for outstanding achievement in Environmental Awareness with the National DAR E. Public Comment The Council takes public comment on all items in the Regular Agenda. Public input on a Regular Agenda item will be taken at its appropriate discussion. Public input on an item not on the Agenda or Consent Agenda may be identified and requested for consideration by the Council at this time. The Council may request an item to be placed on a future agenda, or for a Consent Agenda item, to be moved to the Regular Agenda for public comment.II. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Consideration of approving the March 6, 2012 City Council Regular meeting minutesCity Council Agenda Page 1 of 4 March 20, 2012
  • 2. Consideration of awarding a bid for PK-02-11/Rio Vista Park Renovation to Templeton Construction, Inc. (San Angelo, TX) in the amount of $636,400.00, and authorizing the Interim City Manager or his designee to negotiate a contract and execute any related documents 3. Consideration of adopting Resolutions authorizing the Mayor to execute Tax Deeds for the sale of Tax Lots: a. 715 W 15th Street (Pizano), Lot 8, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, $1,000.00, Suit No. B-94-0062-T b. 22 W 17th Street (Ortiz), Lot 16, Block 22, Lasker Addition, $1,000.00, Suit No. B-95-0064-T c. 701 W 15th Street (James), Lot 1, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, $1,100.00, Suit No. TAX90-0151B d. 703 W 15th Street (James), Lot 2, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, $1,100.00, Suit No. TAX90-0197B e. 1838 Magnolia Street (Bannert), Lot 1 & E 14 ½’ of Lot 2, Block 3, Avondale Addition, $1,000.00, Suit No. TAX91-0035B f. 514 W 15th Street, (Gist), Lot 8, Block 1, Mineola Annex Addition, $1,100.00, Suit No. TAX92-0085B g. 213 W Avenue R, (Cuellar), Lot 18 of Jones SD of E ½ of Block 140, Fort Concho Addition, $1,100.00, Suit No. TAX90-162B h. 624 Culwell, (Martinez), W 50’ of Lot 2, Block 3, C.C. Culwell Addition, $1,000.00, Suit No. TAX93-0029B i. 112 W 16th Street, (Gonzalez), Lot 10, Block 14, Lasker Addition, $1,100.00, Suit No. B-95-0037-T j. 24 W 11th Street, (Murillo), Lot 15, block 53, Miles Addition, $1,000.00, Suit No. B-94-0062-T 4. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the sale to First United Methodist Church, landlord, of tenant improvements and fixtures installed by the City of San Angelo, tenant, to the leased office building located at 106 S. Chadbourne, for $125,000.00, and authorizing the Interim City Manager or his designee to execute a bill of sale and related documents necessary to complete the sale and transfer 5. Consideration of authorizing the Interim City Manager or his designee to execute a Concessionaire Lease Agreement between the City of San Angelo and Above The Clouds, LLC in the amount of $300.00 per month or 5% of gross receipts, whichever is greater, at the San Angelo Regional Airport Terminal Building 6. Consideration of authorizing the Interim City Manager or his designee to execute a Lease Agreement between the City of San Angelo and the United States of America in the amount of $350,000.00 per year for the exclusive use of two hangars (AMCOM) at San Angelo Regional Airport 7. Consideration of adopting a Resolution appointing election officials, judges, and alternate judges for the General Election to be held on May 12, 2012; and providing for an effective date 8. Second Hearing and consideration of adoption of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo Z 12-02: Billy Huffman AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1710 Cox Lane, approximately 700 feet west from the intersection of Cox Lane and Ben Ficklin Road, specifically occupying the B & R Subdivision, Section 2, Tract 2 in south central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Ranch & Estate (R&E) to Office Warehouse (OW) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY 9. Second Hearing and consideration of adoption of an Ordinance amending the 2011-2012 Budget AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2012, FOR NEW PROJECTS, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTSCity Council Agenda Page 2 of 4 March 20, 2012
  • III. REGULAR AGENDA: F. EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.071(1)(a) to consult with attorney on pending or contemplated litigation and Section 551.071(2) to consult with attorney on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with this chapter on issues related to the Texas Open Meetings Act Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to a company or companies with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations and which the City of San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo G. PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT 10. Consideration of approving Municipal Pool fees, rental rates, hours of operation, and any action in connection thereto (Presentation by Recreation Manager MaryAnn Vasquez) 11. Consideration of approving the recommendation for PK 03-11/Concho River Water Feature to begin negotiations with Wesco Fountains of North Venice, Florida for proposal and installation of a fountain/water feature in the Concho River, authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a contract and any related documents with a not-to-exceed amount of $550,000.00 (Presentation by Construction Manager David Knapp and Parks and Recreation Director Carl White) 12. Presentation of the Fiscal Year 2013-2016 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for the 15 counties of Texas Department of Transportation-San Angelo District, including the San Angelo urban area on San Angelo’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Fiscal Years 2013-2016 (Presentation by San Angelo MPO Interim Director Doray Hill, Jr. and Director of Transportation Planning and Development, San Angelo District, John DeWitt) 13. Review of City Hall, Library, and Auditorium budgets, and any action in connection thereto a. Discussion and possible action regarding the use of remaining funds for furnishings, plaza development, landscaping, lighting, and related matters b. Discussion and possible action regarding funding for City Hall and Library office furniture and fixtures c. Discussion and possible action regarding the new naming of the historic Library building d. Discussion and possible action regarding operational changes associated with occupancy of the rehabilitated buildings (Presentation by Assistant City Manager Elizabeth Grindstaff) 14. Presentation from and interview of Executive Search Firms for consideration of the recruitment of the City Manager position, and any action in connection thereto: a. Robert Slavin, President, Slavin Management Consultants b. Alan Taylor, Senior Vice President, Strategic Government Resources (SGR) (Presentation by Human Resources Director Lisa Marley)City Council Agenda Page 3 of 4 March 20, 2012
  • H. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES 15. Consideration of matters discussed in Executive/Session, if needed 16. Announcements and consideration of Future Agenda Items The City of San Angelo will hold public meetings on March 20, 22 and 26 of 2012 to gather citizen input on the 2012-2017 Capital Improvement Plan. 17. Adjournment Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, Wednesday, March 14, 2012, at 6:00 P.M. /s/________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkCity Council Agenda Page 4 of 4 March 20, 2012
  • THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS 9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room 500 Rio Concho Drive An Addendum to an Agenda of a Regular Meeting of the City CouncilIII. REGULAR – (Addition) Public Hearing and consideration of approving a recommendation by the City of San Angelo Development Corporation Board of Directors to direct the publication of a 60-day notice of the specific project for public comment period; awarding the following request for bids, approving the release of the bid bond on withdrawal of a bid, and authorizing Interim City Manager to negotiate and execute contracts related to the abatement and demolition of the Qualtrust Building and Cattle Barn on the San Angelo Fairgrounds and the construction of a new livestock barn on the same site, and related matters as follows: a. Consideration of awarding RFB No. CE-01-12 for the Asbestos Abatement and Demolition of Qualtrust Building and Cattle Barn to Empire Environmental in the amount of $67,600.00 to include asbestos abatement, demolition of the existing building, haul off of all materials, and proper disposal thereof; b. Consideration of awarding RFB No. CE-02-11 for construction of a new livestock building to RM Ford Construction in the amount of $1,154,000.00 for the construction of a new 32,400-square-foot livestock barn, RM Ford Construction being the second-lowest bidder, c. Consideration of approving a request by RBR Construction, Inc. for the release of bid bond due to withdrawal of its bid (Presentation by Community and Economic Development Director Shawn Lewis)Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter551, Friday, March 16, 2012, at 3:00 P.M._________________________________Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
  • PROCLAMATIONWHEREAS, San Angelo Central High School will host the Texas State Gymnastics Meet on May 3, 4, and 5, 2012; andWHEREAS, Over 300 athletes will travel to the Angelo State University Junell Center, along with their families, friends, and supporters for this exciting three day Meet; andWHEREAS, Not only will San Angelo restaurants be positively impacted by this influx of visitors, but also lodging and shopping facilities will experience an increase in activity due to this highly attended, Texas wide event; andWHEREAS, San Angelo is honored to be chosen as the 2012 host site,NOW, THEREFORE, I, Alvin New, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, on behalfof the City Council, do hereby proclaim May 3, 4, and 5, 2012 as “WELCOME TEXAS STATE GYMNASTICS MEET”and encourage all citizens to warmly welcome these outstanding young athletes, theirfamilies, friends, and supporters as we enthusiastically host and attend this importantathletic event. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this 20th day of March, 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ___________________________ ALVIN NEW, MAYOR
  • PROCLAMATIONWHEREAS, Primera Iglesia Bautista was established in 1892 when a few faithful people gathered under the trees on the banks of the Concho River and though they have changed where they met over the years, their mission and spirit has remained the same; andWHEREAS, Their mission field has been to be a beacon in the night, serving as a bilingual and multicultural church committed to exalting Jesus Christ, equipping and edifying their members to evangelize the lost and ministering to the needy of the Concho Valley and beyond; andWHEREAS, They have fulfilled their mission in part by hosting events such as their Back to School Bash providing backpacks and school supplies for children in our community, and every October they host their Fall Festival Trunk or Treat in which they promote a safe place to celebrate for neighborhood children and their parents; andWHEREAS, Primera Church will be celebrating their 120th year of service on the April 1st, 2012 and they invite the community to attend the festivities at 23 W. Avenue J.NOW, THEREFORE, I, Alvin New, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, on behalf ofthe City Council, do hereby proclaim April 1, 2012 as “Primera Church of San Angelo’s 120th Anniversary”and encourage the community to pay tribute to the dedication and service of PrimeraChurch as they celebrate 120 years of commitment in San Angelo. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this 20th day of March, 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO __________________________ ALVIN NEW, MAYOR
  • PROCLAMATIONWHEREAS, thousands of times each year, the underground infrastructure in Texas is damaged by those who do not have underground lines located prior to digging, resulting in service interruption, environmental damage, and threat to public safety; andWHEREAS, in 2005, the federal communications commission designated 811 to provide contractors and homeowners a simple number to contact utility operators to request the location of underground lines at the intended dig site; andWHEREAS, the Concho Valley Damage Prevention Council, a stakeholder- driven organization dedicated to the prevention of damage to underground utilities in San Angelo , promotes the national 811 notification system in an effort to reduce these damages; andWHEREAS, damage prevention is a shared responsibility; by using safe digging practices, the contractors and homeowners of San Angelo can save time and money and help keep our infrastructure safe and connected, and;NOW, THEREFORE, I, Alvin New, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, on behalfof the City Council, do hereby proclaim the month of April 2012 as “San Angelo Safe Digging Month”and encourage contractors and homeowners throughout San Angelo and Tom GreenCounty to always call 811 before digging. Safe digging is no accident! IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this 20th day of March, 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ___________________________ Alvin New, Mayor
  • Recognition for Ken Landon for 20 March City Council MeetingOn January 2012, Kenneth Landon received National recognition from the National Society of theDaughters of the American Revolution (DAR), Conservation Committee, for outstanding achievement inEnvironmental Awareness. This recognition is for Ken’s work in the field of waterlily research,propagation and beautification. We honor Ken for his role over the (nearly) last quarter of a century forcreating, developing and maintaining the International Waterlily Collection and for his recognitiontoday. Sincere thanks are due to the Pocahontas Chapter of the DAR for making application for thisrecognition.
  • CITY COUNCIL MINUTE RECORDThe City of San Angelo Page 363Tuesday, March 6, 2012 Vol. 103 OPEN SESSIONBE IT REMEMBERED City Council convened in a regular meeting at 9:01 A.M., Tuesday, March 6, 2012, inthe San Angelo McNease Convention Center, 500 Rio Concho Drive, San Angelo, Texas. All duly authorizedmembers of the Council, to-wit: Mayor, Alvin New Councilmember Paul Alexander Councilmember Dwain Morrison Councilmember Johnny Silvas Councilmember Fredd B. Adams, II Councilmember Kendall Hirschfeld Councilmember Charlotte Farmerwere present and acting, with the exception of Councilmember Adams, thus constituting a quorum.Whereupon, the following business was transacted:An invocation was given by Mrs. Karen of the Jewish Faith Tradition and pledge was led by Jacob Ruthenbeck,,8th Grader from Trinity Lutheran School.PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITION“Girl Scouts Day”, March 12, 2012 and celebrating 100 years of Girl Scouting, was accepted by AngelLawrence, Senior Girl Scout, Cayenne Lawrence, Brownie Girl Scout, and Holland Flage, Daisy Girl ScoutTroop 5158, first grader at Bonham Elementary.“National Nutrition Month”, March 2012, was accepted by Betty Teston, Local Dietitian, Big Country Academyof Nutrition & Dietetics.City Manager Harold Dominguez in recognition of over eight years of service to the City of San AngeloPUBLIC COMMENTPublic comments were made by San Angelo of Fine Arts and Museum Director Howard Taylor, Consultants ArtHererra, and Amy Quintanilla regarding the consulting services and preparation of a study for the assessment ofcurrent resources and future recommendations for facilities and enhancements in the cultural district authorizedby City Council on February 21, 2012. The Consultants introduced fellow partners Phillip Collins, DallasCultural Affairs Chairman and City Cultural District Commissioner, Doug Harmon, Former City of Ft. WorthCity Manager, and Calvin Smith, Baylor University Archeologist.CONSENT AGENDAAPPROVAL OF THE FEBRUARY 21, 2012 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTESAWARD OF BID SB-01-12 FOR COLD APPLIED CRACK SEALANT TO EZ SEAL, LLC (VAN ALSTYNE,TX) IN AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEED $111,899. 20, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGEROR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY RELATED DOCUMENTSAPPROVAL OF A RESIDENTIAL LEASE RENEWAL AT LOT 22, GROUP 9, 1926 SOUTH CONCHO(GILBERT); AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE WATER UTILITIES DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE THESAMEAPPROVAL OF CITY REPRESENTATIVE APPOINTMENTS TO THE CONCHO WATERMASTERADVISORY COMMITTEE
  • Page 364 MinutesVol. 103 March 6, 2012AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER #1 TO WU-7-10 RIOCONCHO DRIVE SEWER TRUNK CONTRACT WITH HOLLOMAN CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNTOF $405,339.00 FOR ADDITIONAL WORK REQUIRED DUE TO DIFFERING SUBSURFACECONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED IN CONCHO DR. AND OAKES ST.APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION BY THE TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE (TIRZ)BOARD AUTHORIZING A REVISION TO THE NORTH ANGELO REDEVELOPMENT INCENTIVESPROGRAM POLICY GUIDELINES TO ALTER THE ASBESTOS ABATEMENT INCENTIVE TO 50%MATCHING FUNDS INCENTIVE WITH THE MAXIMUM TIRZ EXPENDITURE TO BE $15,000.00APPROVAL OF A TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE (TIRZ) BOARD RECOMMENDATION TOEXPEND UP TO $10,000.00 FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR UPDATING THE LETTER OF NOPREJUDICE (LONP) IN ORDER TO CAPTURE VALUE ASSOCIATED WITH THE DOWNTOWNPEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT PLAN TO BE USED IN THE FUTURE FOR CASH MATCH FOR FUTUREFEDERAL AND STATE GRANTSADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEETO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH DOWNTOWN SANANGELO, INC. (DSA) RELATING TO SHARED RESPONSIBILITY FOR FUNDING ANDCONSTRUCTING OF THE DOWNTOWN PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ANNEX A, PAGE 369,RESOLUTION #2012-03-031R)Motion, to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented, was made by Councilmember Hirschfeld and secondedby Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously.REGULAR AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENTAPPROVAL OF MATTERS RELATED TO THE EMPLOYEE POLICY MANUAL• APPROVAL OF NEW POLICIES HAVING OR EXPECTING TO HAVE AN INCREASED FINANCIAL IMPACT ON THE CITY: DRUG TESTING, HIRING RATES OF PAY, CALLBACK HOURS, AND SEVERANCE PAY• UPDATE ON NEWLY ESTABLISHED POLICIES APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGERHuman Resources Director Lisa Marley presented background information. A copy of the presentation is partof the Permanent Supplemental Minute record.General discussion was held on disaster preparedness exempt employees receiving overtime pay, sick leave timeaccumulation and the maximum amount allowed under the current policy, and actual hours worked used tocalculate overtime.Ms. Marley reviewed the newly established policies, e.g., tobacco free workplace, gratuities, leave without pay(too open ended-need a max amount), progressive discipline, appropriate notice of resignation for leave payoff.General discussion was held on the payout process when an employee resigns or terminates their employment,specifically if an employee is terminated with cause. City Council suggested staff reconsider the payout processfor these types of terminations and present their recommendation at a future meeting.Mayor suggested staff also present the remaining policies separately at future meetings, e.g. disasterpreparedness and tying funeral leave requests under the sick leave provisions.Motion, to approve the new policies regarding drug testing, hiring rates of pay, callback hours, and severancepay, was made by Mayor New and seconded by Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously.RECESSAt 10:30 A.M., Mayor New called a recess.
  • Minutes Page 365March 6, 2012 Vol. 103RECONVENEAt 10:38 A.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted:DIRECTION FOR STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE UPPER COLORADORIVER AUTHORITY (UCRA) INTERLOCAL SERVICE AGREEMENTS INTO ONE INTERLOCALSERVICE AGREEMENTCity Manager Harold Dominguez, UCRA Representatives Stephen Brown, and Chuck Brown presentedbackground information.Council directed staff to work with UCRA Representatives to further develop and negotiate the terms of theproposed consolidated agreement, specifically addressing water quality; stormwater education and adding anescalator provision to provide for inflationary cost with a short term provision for review of said cost; providingassistance with water education in the amount of $25K; leveraging dollars and providing assistance andoversight on the River project; and to continue the existing arrangement until the City can surmise a clear senseof its responsibilities and work load on staff regarding Stormwater management.APPROVAL OF MATTERS RELATED TO ZONING CASE Z 12-02 BILLY HUFFMAN:• APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S RECOMMENDATION MODIFYING A REQUEST FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM RANCH & ESTATE (R&E) TO OFFICE WAREHOUSE (OW)• FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO Z 12-02: Billy Huffman AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1710 Cox Lane, approximately 700 feet west from the intersection of Cox Lane and Ben Ficklin Road, specifically occupying the B & R Subdivision, Section 2, Tract 2 in south central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Ranch & Estate (R&E) to Office Warehouse (OW) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYPlanning Manager AJ Fawver presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of thePermanent Supplemental Minute record.Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Hirschfeld and seconded byCouncilmember Alexander.General discussion was held on the future improvements of the roadway.A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously.DISCUSSION AND FURTHER NEGOTIATION OF A DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONALAGREEMENT FOR PERFORMING ARTS CAMPUS BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELOAND THE SAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION (SAPAC) RELATING TO THE CREATIONAND DEVELOPMENT OF A PERFORMING ARTS CENTER AND CAMPUS WHICH WILL INCLUDETHE CITY AUDITORIUM; PROVIDING FOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES BY SAPAC; PROVIDINGFOR THE USE OF OFFICE SPACE WITHIN CITY HALL BY SAPAC; PROVIDING FOR FUNDINGRESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES; AND PROVIDING FOR RELATED MATTERSCity Manager Harold Dominguez and SAPAC representative Matt Lewis presented background information.Mr. Dominguez explained the key terms of the contract noting SAPAC will contribute $2.5M to complete theAuditorium annex. He explained City staff approached SAPAC with the opportunity to build out the
  • Page 366 MinutesVol. 103 March 6, 2012Auditorium, thereby providing a benefit to both parties by allowing SAPAC to operate the Auditorium, andlocate their offices within the Auditorium creating a common management concept. Mr. Lewis informedSAPAC has raised $7.25M of their $13M goal. He added SAPAC will reimburse the City for expenditures tooccupancy the leased space at 100% and the Hotel and Motel Occupancy Tax Revenue (HOT) from the SanAngelo Cultural Affairs Council (SACAC) would be transferred to SAPAC. Mr. Lewis explained SAPAC didnot want negatively impact any organization because of the reformation, therefore he requested an additional2.5% of HOT be transferred to the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts (SAMFA).Mr. Dominguez noted at the last meeting, Council questioned the 50 year term of the contract. He notedSAPAC the proposed term allowed negotiating leverage for fund raising initiatives and donor fundingagreements; therefore, the contract term was changed to 20 years with 3 ten year option renewals, contingent onperformance, as required. He noted the termination clause was revised to include planning phases and mutualparty termination provisions, and also added provisions to allow annual reviews and adjustments of the $2 ticketfee for maintenance of the facility by City Council.Mr. Lewis commented on the functioning issues of the stage, dressing rooms, and loading dock. He stated the$2.5M will cover those modifications to allow more backstage space for traveling productions. He informedSAPAC is seeking an additional $1.1M for other improvements and a future goal to raise an additional $1.5M tomeet ADA compliance standards, via fund raising and grant writing, to obtain the additional $2.6M.General discussion was held on the whether the city was giving up too much for the $2.5M contribution fromSAPAC, the potential to recruit more events, the future marketing of the facility, the benefits to the tax payer,the potential to create another area within the City to display historical items, the current and potential revenuegenerated from the use of Auditorium, the cost to operate the Auditorium, access to program scholarships andprograms to larger segments of the population, and the vision to create new public private partnerships, e.g.Santa Fe Golf Course, San Angelo Stock Show and Rodeo Association, etc.Public comments were made by Citizen Jim Turner.Mr. Dominguez provided a brief history of Council’s desire to provide financial assistance with HOT funds and,if successful, the City would decrease the allocation and allow organizations an opportunity to apply foradditional funding. He reviewed the HOT distribution noting the City received 48% for Civic Events; however,he noted Ft Concho is also eligible for such funds. He questioned whether there should be a competitiveprocess to compete for the HOT funds. Based on this inquiry, he reviewed the tiered HOT allocation in theSAPAC contract which was based on their performance and ability to create a return on investment. Mr. Lewisnoted SACAC currently receives 5% HOT funds which SAMFA is one of the organizations of funded bySACAC. He suggested Council consider directly allocating 2% to SAMFA, which he understood would requirea separate agreement. He stated SAPAC will not sign an agreement until they were ensured the affectedorganization’s allocations are secured.General discussion was held on building a provision to increase the HOT allocation to 10% over a five yearperiod and adding language which demonstrated a charitable component for those non-profit organizations.Public comments were made by San Angelo Ballet Executive Director Tara Rainey, San Angelo Cultural Artsrepresentative Daniel Makins, and Proponent Lisa Roberts.RECESSAt 12:54 P.M., Mayor New called a recess.EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSIONAt 1:13 P.M., Council convened in Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. OpenGovernment; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions toRequirement that Meetings be Open, 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of realproperty; Section 551.071(1)(a) to consult with attorney on contemplated litigation and Section 551.071(2) toconsult with attorney on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the TexasDisciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with this chapter on issues
  • Minutes Page 367March 6, 2012 Vol. 103related to the Texas Open Meetings Act; and Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentiveto a company or companies with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic developmentnegotiations and which the City of San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo.OPEN SESSION (continued)At 2:13 P.M. City Council concluded the Executive/Closed Session whereupon the following business wastransacted:RECESSAt 2:13 P.M., Mayor New called a recess.RECONVENEAt 2:15 P.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted:FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2011-2012BUDGETAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCALYEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2012, FOR NEW PROJECTS,INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTSBudget Manager Morgan Trainer presented background information.Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Hirschfeld and seconded byCouncilmember Silvas. Motion carried unanimously.DISCUSSION OF 2012-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANBudget Manager Morgan Trainer presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of thePermanent Supplemental Minute record.Ms. Trainer informed the Committee consisted of the City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Water UtilityDirector, Finance Director, Budget Manager, and two additional staff members. Council suggested staff includethe City Engineer, specifically to address stormwater and street projects.DIRECTION TO STAFF TO THE INCREASE THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT FROM 30 TO 35 MPH ONFOSTER ROAD FROM LOOP 306 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD NORTH TO THE END AT SUNSETDRIVE AND TO ADDRESS THE CHANGES IN THE RELATED ORDINANCECity Engineer Clinton Bailey presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of thePermanent Supplemental Minute record.Council directed staff to change the speed limit from 30 to 35 mph from the service road south of Foster Road atthe river to Sunset Drive and to present the change via ordinance at a future meeting.Responding to a question from Citizen Van Carson, Mr. Bailey stated the direct access from Cox Lane ontoFoster Road is a safety risk, would require a massive grade level change, and require purchase of propertyeasement to make a smooth transition.UPDATE FROM THE SUB-COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRMS FOR THE RECRUITMENTOF THE CITY MANAGER POSITIONHuman Resources Lisa Marley presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of thePermanent Supplemental Minute record.FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUESCONSIDERATION OF MATTERS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSIONNo action was taken on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session.
  • Page 368 MinutesVol. 103 March 6, 2012APPROVAL OF A BOARD NOMINATION BY COUNCIL AND DESIGNATED COUNCILMEMBERS:Keep San Angelo Beautiful: Jeana Fox (Mayor) to a 1st full term September 2013Motion, to approve a board nomination by Council and designated Councilmembers, was made by Mayor Newand seconded by Councilmember Silvas. Motion carried unanimously.CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMSCity Manager Harold Dominguez distributed the proposed March 20, 2012 Agenda and solicited Councilcomments and suggestions.Mayor New announced he would be absent on March 20, 2012.Councilmember Silvas – consider an ordinance requiring addresses to be clearly displayedCouncilmember Hirschfeld – update on the Downtown Master DeveloperCouncilmember Alexander – clarification on the Spring Creek Marina property lines, liquidity of property, andrelated issuesInterim City Manager Michael Dane – updates on the following projects:• Chadbourne Street S Curve• City Hall renovation update, final plans, and associated completion• HickoryADJOURNMENTMotion, to adjourn, was made by Councilmember Hirschfeld and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motioncarried unanimously.The meeting adjourned at 2:59 P.M. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ___________________________________ATTEST: Alvin New, Mayor_______________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkAnnex AIn accordance with Chapter 2, Article 2.300, of the Official Code of the City of San Angelo, the minutes of thismeeting consist of the preceding Minute Record and the Supplemental Minute Record. Details on Councilmeetings may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office or a video of the entire meeting may be purchased fromthe Public Information Officer at 481-2727. (Portions of the Supplemental Minute Record video tape recordingmay be distorted due to equipment malfunction or other uncontrollable factors.)
  • City of San AngeloMemo Date: March 6, 2012 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Carl White, Parks & Recreation Director Subject: Agenda Item for March 20, 2012 Council Meeting Contact: Carl White, Parks & Recreation Director, 657-4279 Caption: Regular Item Consideration of awarding a bid for PK-02-11 /Rio Vista Park Renovation to Templeton Construction Co., Inc. from San Angelo, Texas in the amount of $636,400.00, and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate a contract and execute any related documents. Summary: The City began planning for the renovation of the Park in 2009. Working with staff and listening to public comment, the architect developed the construction documents for the project. Bids were received January 13, 2012. Staff recommends awarding the bid to Templeton Construction, Inc. for $636,400.00 which includes the Base Bid and Alternate #2A for new lighting. We plan to complete the concrete trail work identified in Alternate #5 with Park’s Staff, as previously approved. History: In the Fall of 2009, the City approved the selection of Kinney Franke Architects to design the renovation of the existing park including a new restroom building, playground equipment and walking trail along with renovations to existing basketball & tennis courts, fencing and lighting. The City issued an RFB for the renovation of Rio Vista Park in December 2011 and bids were received January 13, 2012. Two bidders participated and provided bid packages. Financial Impact: The available budget for the Rio Vista Park Renovation is ($500,000.00). Funding comes from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funding (HUD Section 108 loan). Additional funding in the amount of $163,900.00 is required from the Half Cent Sales Tax money budgeted to Parks projects ($97,900.00) and from CDBG contingency funds ($66,000.00) to award the contract; $136,400.00 is needed to cover the base bid ($616,700.00) and Alternate #2A for new lighting ($19,700.00). An Additional $27,500 is needed for Park’s staff to complete Alternate #5, the trail, in-house (as previously approved). Related Vision Item Increase unstructured recreational opportunities in lieu of programmed activities and increase the availability of public restrooms. (if applicable): Other Information/ Consideration of awarding a bid for PK-02-11 /Rio Vista Park Renovation to Templeton Recommendation: Construction Co., Inc. from San Angelo, Texas in the amount of $636,400.00, and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate a contract and execute any related documents. Attachments: Bid Tab
  • Presentation: Verbal and PowerPoint.Publication: n/aReviewed by March 14, 2012Director:Approved by Legal: March 14, 2012
  • City of San AngeloMemo Date: February 27, 2012 To: Mayor and Council Members From: Roger S. Banks, Purchasing, Division Manager Subject: Agenda Item for March 20, 2012 Council Meeting Contact: Diana Farris, Purchasing Manager, 657-4212 Caption: Consent Item Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a Resolution authorizing sale of Tax Lot(s): th 1. 715 W 15 Street, (Pizano), Lot 8, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, $1,000, Suit No. B-94-0062-T th 2. 22 W 17 Street, (Ortiz), Lot 16, Block 22, Lasker Addition, $1,000, Suit No. B-95-0064-T th 3. 701 W 15 Street, (James), Lot 1, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, $1,100, Suit No. TAX90- 0151B th 4. 703 W 15 Street, (James), Lot 2, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, $1,100, Suit No. TAX90- 0197B 5. 1838 Magnolia Street, (Bannert), Lot 1 & E 14 ½’ of Lot 2, Block 3, Avondale Addition, $1,000, Suit No. TAX91-0035B th 6. 514 W 15 Street, (Gist), Lot 8, Block 1, Mineola Annex Addition, $1,100, Suit No. TAX92-0085B 7. 213 W Avenue R, (Cuellar), Lot 18 of Jones SD of E ½ of Block 140, Fort Concho Addition, $1,100, Suit No. TAX90-162B 8. 624 Culwell, (Martinez), W 50’ of Lot 2, Block 3, C.C. Culwell Addition, $1,000, Suit No. TAX93- 0029B th 9. 112 W 16 Street, (Gonzalez), Lot 10, Block 14, Lasker Addition, $1,100, Suit No. B-95-0037-T th 10. 24 W 11 Street, (Murillo), Lot 15, block 53, Miles Addition, $1,000, Suit No. B-94-0062-T Summary: The subject properties were auctioned with no offers received. Subsequently, the properties were struck off to the City as Trustee for itself and the other taxing entities. (See Property Analysis) History: Amounts of delinquent taxes, accrued penalties, interest, attorney fees and costs for delinquent years of, together with additional penalties and interest at the rates prescribed by Subchapter A & C of Chapter 33, Property Tax Code, which accrue on all said taxes from date of judgment until paid. (See Property Analysis). Financial Impact: Upon approval: (1) The City will retain a $350 Administration Fee, (2) The balance will be distributed according to the judgment on the Sheriff’s Return, and (3) Properties will be reinstated back onto tax roll. Other Information/Recommendation: All property(s) are unimproved parcels. No outstanding account balances exist for the above Prospective Buyers and it is recommended that the above offer(s) be accepted. Attachments: Property Analysis, Resolutions, Tax-Resale Deeds, and Property Location Maps Presentation: N/A Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane, Director of Finance
  • Lot 8, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition715 W 15th St 50 x 150Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Thu Dec 22 2011 10:46:21 AM.
  • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strikeany or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the publicrecords: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, San Angelo Independent School District. P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902 Grantee: Jonathan Pizano, a single person and Chelsey Pizano, a single person 714 Shetland Street Rockville, Montgomery County, Maryland 20851 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 8, Block 4, Mineola Annex, as described in Volume 864, Page 423, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Acct. #20-35000-0004-008-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on April 22, 1996, in Cause No. B-94-0062-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated October 26, 1998, and recorded in Volume 671, Page 130, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
  • Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Each taxing unit that is entitled toreceive proceeds from the sale of the Property has consented to this sale and has authorized this sale by formalresolution. The parties acknowledge that the sale of the Property to Grantee does not constitute a violation ofSection 52, Article III, Texas Constitution. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2012, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:City Attorney’s Office
  • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 8, Block 4, Mineola Annex, as described in Volume 864, Page 423, Deed Records of Tom Green County, TexasImproved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: B-94-0062-TLocation: 715 W 15th StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 50 x 150City of San Angelo vs. J.C. ClayTax ID Number: 20-35000-0004-008-00Judgment Date: April 22, 1996Date of Sheriffs Sale: July 9, 1998Sheriffs Deed Recorded: October 29, 1998Adjudge Value: $ 2,422.00PROPOSED Offer: $ 1,000.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.00% $ 350.00Maintenance Fee $ - 0.00% $ -District Clerk $ 254.69 $ 254.69 0.00% $ 254.69Sheriffs Fee $ 77.47 $ 77.47 0.00% $ 77.47Attorney Fee $ 63.06 $ 63.06 0.00% $ 63.06Municipal Liens $ 1,121.07 55.31% $ 140.93 $ 140.93Taxes $ 905.71 44.69% $ 113.85 $ 113.85Total $ 745.22 $ 2,026.78 $ 745.22 100.00% $ 254.78 $ 1,000.00Actual Total Amt Due $ 2,772.00Amount Remaining $ 254.78 Proposed Offer will satisfy the court cost and a portion of the taxes and liens.
  • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) WHEREAS, on the day of , 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting ofthe City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, there was presented to said Council theproposal for the City to sell a parcel of land situated within the city limits of the City of SanAngelo, said parcel being described as follows: Lot 8, Block 4, Mineola Annex, as described in Volume 864, Page 423, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. WHEREAS, said lot(s) are held by the City of San Angelo, as Trustee by virtue of Sheriff’sTax Deed, recorded on Volume 671, Page 130, of the Official Public Records of Real Property,Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of SanAngelo as Trustee to sell said lot(s) for an amount that is less than the lesser of the market valuespecified in the Judgment of foreclosure or the amount of the judgment(s) against said property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO: That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized in his capacityas representative of the City of San Angelo, as Trustee to execute a Quitclaim Deed to the abovedescribed lot(s) to JONATHAN PIZANO, a single person, CHELSEY PIZANO, a single person,for the consideration of One Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) and that the sale for saidamount is also hereby authorized and approved.APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:_____________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:______________________ ____________________________Lysia Bowling, City Attorney Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Managerc:usersbryan.kendrickdesktop3-20-123aresolution.doc
  • Lot 16, Block 22, Lasker Addition22 W 17th Street 50 x 140Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Tue Feb 14 2012 03:25:40 PM.
  • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strikeany or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the publicrecords: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, San Angelo Independent School District. P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902 Grantee: Sergio and Cirila Ortiz, husband and wife 18 W. 17th Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 16, Block 22, Lasker Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 652, Page 252, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Acct.:17-31200-0022-011-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on June 9, 1997, in Cause No. B-95-0064-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated March 3, 1998, and recorded in Volume 626, Page 784, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose. Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the market
  • value specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Each taxing unit that is entitled toreceive proceeds from the sale of the Property has consented to this sale and has authorized this sale by formalresolution. The parties acknowledge that the sale of the Property to Grantee does not constitute a violation ofSection 52, Article III, Texas Constitution. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2012, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To: City Attorney’s Office
  • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 16, Block 22, Lasker Addition, City of San Angelo, as descrived in Volume 652, Page 252, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: B-95-0064-TLocation: 22 W 17th StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 50 x 140City of San Angelo vs. Paula Diana Pittman, individually & as administrator of th estate of Ann Gardner, decreasedTax ID Number: 17-31200-0022-011-00Judgment Date: September 9, 1997Date of Sheriffs Sale: January 12, 1998Sheriffs Deed Recorded: March 6, 1998Adjudge Value: $ 4,331.00PROPOSED Offer: $ 1,000.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.00% $ 350.00Maintenance Fee $ - 0.00% $ -District Clerk $ 274.00 $ 274.00 0.00% $ 274.00Sheriffs Fee $ 155.61 $ 155.61 0.00% $ 155.61Attorney Fee $ 63.24 $ 63.24 0.00% $ 63.24Municipal Liens $ 11.00 0.29% $ 0.45 $ 0.45Taxes $ 3,827.15 99.71% $ 156.70 $ 156.70Total $ 842.85 $ 3,838.15 $ 842.85 100.00% $ 157.15 $ 1,000.00Actual Total Amt Due $ 4,681.00Amount Remaining $ 157.15 Proposed Offer will satisfy the court cost and a portion of the taxes and liens.
  • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) WHEREAS, on the day of , 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting ofthe City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, there was presented to said Council theproposal for the City to sell a parcel of land situated within the city limits of the City of SanAngelo, said parcel being described as follows: Lot 16, Block 22, Lasker Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 652, Page 252, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. WHEREAS, said lot(s) are held by the City of San Angelo, as Trustee by virtue of Sheriff’sTax Deed, recorded on Volume 626, Page 784, of the Official Public Records of Real Property,Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of SanAngelo as Trustee to sell said lot(s) for an amount that is less than the lesser of the market valuespecified in the Judgment of foreclosure or the amount of the judgment(s) against said property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO: That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized in his capacityas representative of the City of San Angelo, as Trustee to execute a Quitclaim Deed to the abovedescribed lot(s) to SERGIO & CIRILA ORTINZ, a married couple, for the consideration of OneThousand and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) and that the sale for said amount is also herebyauthorized and approved.APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:_____________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:______________________ ____________________________Lysia Bowling, City Attorney Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Managerc:usersbryan.kendrickdesktop3-20-123bresolution.doc
  • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strikeany or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the publicrecords: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, San Angelo Independent School District and County Education District #9 P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902 Grantee: Vanessa Simone James, a single person 2302 Brown Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 1, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 363, Page 475, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. #20-35000-0004-001-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on June 16, 1993, in Cause No. TAX90-0151B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated March 15, 1994, and recorded in Volume 420, Page 598, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
  • Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Each taxing unit that is entitled toreceive proceeds from the sale of the Property has consented to this sale and has authorized this sale by formalresolution. The parties acknowledge that the sale of the Property to Grantee does not constitute a violation ofSection 52, Article III, Texas Constitution. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment By: ____________________________ATTEST: Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2012, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:City Attorney’s Office
  • Lot 1, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition701 W 15th St 50 x 150Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Tue Dec 20 2011 04:22:39 PM.
  • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 1, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 363, Page 475, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: TAX90-0151BLocation: 701 W 15th StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 50 x 150City of San Angelo vs. Leslie Bowman HigginsTax ID Number: 20-35000-0004-00100Judgment Date: June 16, 1993Date of Sheriffs Sale: February 7, 1994Sheriffs Deed Recorded: March 21, 1994Adjudge Value: $ 4,993.00PROPOSED Offer: $ 1,000.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.00% $ 350.00Maintenance Fee $ - 0.00% $ -District Clerk $ 126.00 $ 126.00 0.00% $ 126.00Sheriffs Fee $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.00% $ 50.00Attorney Fee $ 168.04 $ 168.04 0.00% $ 168.04Municipal Liens $ 1,741.48 37.70% $ 115.33 $ 115.33Taxes $ 2,878.43 62.30% $ 190.63 $ 190.63Total $ 694.04 $ 4,619.91 $ 694.04 100.00% $ 305.96 $ 1,000.00Actual Total Amt Due $ 5,313.95Amount Remaining $ 305.96 Proposed Offer will satisfy the court cost and a portion of the taxes and liens.
  • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) WHEREAS, on the day of , 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting ofthe City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, there was presented to said Council theproposal for the City to sell a parcel of land situated within the city limits of the City of SanAngelo, said parcel being described as follows: Lot 1, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 363, Page 475, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. WHEREAS, said lot(s) are held by the City of San Angelo, as Trustee by virtue of Sheriff’sTax Deed, recorded on Volume 420, Page 598, of the Official Public Records of Real Property,Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of SanAngelo as Trustee to sell said lot(s) for an amount that is less than the lesser of the market valuespecified in the Judgment of foreclosure or the amount of the judgment(s) against said property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO: That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized in his capacityas representative of the City of San Angelo, as Trustee to execute a Quitclaim Deed to the abovedescribed lot(s) to VANESSA SIMONE JAMES, a single person, for the consideration of OneThousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,100.00) and that the sale for said amount is alsohereby authorized and approved.APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:_____________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:______________________ ____________________________Lysia Bowling, City Attorney Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Managerc:usersbryan.kendrickdesktop3-20-123cresolution.doc
  • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strikeany or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the publicrecords: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, San Angelo Independent School District and County Education District #9 P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902 Grantee: Vanessa Simone James, a single person 2302 Brown Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 2, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 363, Page 475, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. #20-35000-0004-002-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on August 25, 1992, in Cause No. TAX90-0197B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated February 21, 1996, and recorded in Volume 518, Page 347, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
  • Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Each taxing unit that is entitled toreceive proceeds from the sale of the Property has consented to this sale and has authorized this sale by formalresolution. The parties acknowledge that the sale of the Property to Grantee does not constitute a violation ofSection 52, Article III, Texas Constitution. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2012, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:City Attorney’s Office
  • Lot 2, Block 4, Mineola AnnexAddition703 W 15th St 50 x 150Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Wed Dec 21 2011 11:52:15 AM.
  • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 2, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 363, Page 475, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: TAX90-0197BLocation: 703 W 15th StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 50 x 150City of San Angelo vs. Henry SandlesTax ID Number: 20-35000-0004-002-00Judgment Date: August 25, 1992Date of Sheriffs Sale: January 15, 1996Sheriffs Deed Recorded: February 26, 1996Adjudge Value: $ 2,500.00PROPOSED Offer: $ 1,000.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.00% $ 350.00Maintenance Fee $ - 0.00% $ -District Clerk $ 421.38 $ 421.38 0.00% $ 421.38Sheriffs Fee $ 123.70 $ 123.70 0.00% $ 123.70Attorney Fee $ 40.50 $ 40.50 0.00% $ 40.50Municipal Liens $ 603.18 31.51% $ 20.30 $ 20.30Taxes $ 1,311.24 68.49% $ 44.12 $ 44.12Total $ 935.58 $ 1,914.42 $ 935.58 100.00% $ 64.42 $ 1,000.00Actual Total Amt Due $ 2,850.00Amount Remaining $ 64.42 Proposed Offer will satisfy the court cost and a portion of the taxes and liens.
  • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) WHEREAS, on the day of , 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting ofthe City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, there was presented to said Council theproposal for the City to sell a parcel of land situated within the city limits of the City of SanAngelo, said parcel being described as follows: Lot 2, Block 4, Mineola Annex Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 363, Page 475, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. WHEREAS, said lot(s) are held by the City of San Angelo, as Trustee by virtue of Sheriff’sTax Deed, recorded on Volume 518, Page 346, of the Official Public Records of Real Property,Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of SanAngelo as Trustee to sell said lot(s) for an amount that is less than the lesser of the market valuespecified in the Judgment of foreclosure or the amount of the judgment(s) against said property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO: That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized in his capacityas representative of the City of San Angelo, as Trustee to execute a Quitclaim Deed to the abovedescribed lot(s) to VANESSA SIMONE JAMES, a single person, for the consideration of OneThousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,100.00) and that the sale for said amount is alsohereby authorized and approved.APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:_____________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:______________________ ____________________________Lysia Bowling, City Attorney Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Managerc:usersbryan.kendrickdesktop3-20-123dresolution.doc
  • Lot 1 & E 14 1/2 of Lot 2, Avondale Addition1838 Magnolia St 42 x 130Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Wed Dec 21 2011 09:53:29 AM.
  • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strikeany or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the publicrecords: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, San Angelo Independent School District, San Angelo Junior College, and County Education District #9 P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902 Grantee: Genevieve Bannert, a single person 1836 Magnolia Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 1 and the East 14 ½ feet of Lot 2, Block 3, Avondale Addition, described in Volume 334, Page 128, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. #02-12400-0003-001-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on August 25, 1992, in Cause No. TAX91-0035B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated February 21, 1996, and recorded in Volume 518, Page 332, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
  • Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Each taxing unit that is entitled toreceive proceeds from the sale of the Property has consented to this sale and has authorized this sale by formalresolution. The parties acknowledge that the sale of the Property to Grantee does not constitute a violation ofSection 52, Article III, Texas Constitution. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment By: ____________________________ATTEST: Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2012, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:City Attorney’s Office
  • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 1 and the East 14 1/2 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, Avondale Addition, described in Volume 334, Page 128, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: TAX91-0035BLocation: 1838 Magnolia StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 42 x 130City of San Angelo vs. George Martin, Jr.Tax ID Number: 02-12400-0003-001-00Judgment Date: August 25, 1992Date of Sheriffs Sale: January 15, 1996Sheriffs Deed Recorded: February 26, 1996Adjudge Value: $ 1,500.00PROPOSED Offer: $ 1,000.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.00% $ 350.00Maintenance Fee $ - 0.00% $ -District Clerk $ 398.69 $ 398.69 0.00% $ 398.69Sheriffs Fee $ 171.57 $ 171.57 0.00% $ 171.57Attorney Fee $ - $ - 0.00% $ -Municipal Liens $ 399.52 42.97% $ 34.27 $ 34.27Taxes $ 530.22 57.03% $ 45.47 $ 45.47Total $ 920.26 $ 929.74 $ 920.26 100.00% $ 79.74 $ 1,000.00Actual Total Amt Due $ 1,850.00Amount Remaining $ 79.74 Proposed Offer will satisfy the court cost and a portion of the taxes and liens.
  • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) WHEREAS, on the day of , 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting ofthe City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, there was presented to said Council theproposal for the City to sell a parcel of land situated within the city limits of the City of SanAngelo, said parcel being described as follows: Lot 1 and the East 14 ½ feet of Lot 2, Block 3, Avondale Addition, described in Volume 334, Page 128, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. WHEREAS, said lot(s) are held by the City of San Angelo, as Trustee by virtue of Sheriff’sTax Deed, recorded on Volume 518, Page 332, of the Official Public Records of Real Property,Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of SanAngelo as Trustee to sell said lot(s) for an amount that is less than the lesser of the market valuespecified in the Judgment of foreclosure or the amount of the judgment(s) against said property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO: That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized in his capacityas representative of the City of San Angelo, as Trustee to execute a Quitclaim Deed to the abovedescribed lot(s) to GENEVIEVE BANNERT, a single person, for the consideration of OneThousand and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) and that the sale for said amount is also herebyauthorized and approved.APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:_____________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:______________________ ____________________________Lysia Bowling, City Attorney Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Managerc:usersbryan.kendrickdesktop3-20-123eresolution.doc
  • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strikeany or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the publicrecords: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, San Angelo Independent School District. P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902 Grantee: Shawn Yvette Gist, a single person 4564 Mountain Laurel Drive Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas75052 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 8, Block 1, Mineola Annex Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 409, Page 138, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Acct. #20-35000-0001-006-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on February 16, 1996, in Cause No. TAX92-0085B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated October 26, 1998, and recorded in Volume 671, Page 142, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
  • Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Each taxing unit that is entitled toreceive proceeds from the sale of the Property has consented to this sale and has authorized this sale by formalresolution. The parties acknowledge that the sale of the Property to Grantee does not constitute a violation ofSection 52, Article III, Texas Constitution. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2012, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:City Attorney’s Office
  • Lot 8, Block 1, Mineola Annex Addition514 W 15th St 50 x 171Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Thu Dec 22 2011 10:50:25 AM.
  • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 8, Block 1, Mineola Annex Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 409, Page 138, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: TAX92-0085BLocation: 514 W 15th StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 50 x 171City of San Angelo vs. Lolis Gist, Sr.Tax ID Number: 20-35000-0001-006-00Judgment Date: February 16, 1996Date of Sheriffs Sale: July 9, 1998Sheriffs Deed Recorded: October 29, 1998Adjudge Value: $ 3,750.00PROPOSED Offer: $ 1,100.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.00% $ 350.00Maintenance Fee $ - 0.00% $ -District Clerk $ 449.69 $ 449.69 0.00% $ 449.69Sheriffs Fee $ 146.12 $ 146.12 0.00% $ 146.12Attorney Fee $ 90.96 $ 90.96 0.00% $ 90.96Municipal Liens $ 11.00 0.40% $ 0.25 $ 0.25Taxes $ 2,752.23 99.60% $ 62.98 $ 62.98Total $ 1,036.77 $ 2,763.23 $ 1,036.77 100.00% $ 63.23 $ 1,100.00Actual Total Amt Due $ 3,800.00Amount Remaining $ 63.23 Proposed Offer will satisfy the court cost and a portion of the taxes and liens.
  • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) WHEREAS, on the day of , 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting ofthe City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, there was presented to said Council theproposal for the City to sell a parcel of land situated within the city limits of the City of SanAngelo, said parcel being described as follows: Lot 8, Block 1, Mineola Annex Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 409, Page 138, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. WHEREAS, said lot(s) are held by the City of San Angelo, as Trustee by virtue of Sheriff’sTax Deed, recorded on Volume 671, Page 142, of the Official Public Records of Real Property,Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of SanAngelo as Trustee to sell said lot(s) for an amount that is less than the lesser of the market valuespecified in the Judgment of foreclosure or the amount of the judgment(s) against said property; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO: That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized in his capacityas representative of the City of San Angelo, as Trustee to execute a Quitclaim Deed to the abovedescribed lot(s) to SHAWN YVETTE GIST, a single person, for the consideration of OneThousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,100.00) and that the sale for said amount is alsohereby authorized and approved.APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:_____________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:______________________ ____________________________Lysia Bowling, City Attorney Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Managerc:usersbryan.kendrickdesktop3-20-123fresolution.doc
  • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strikeany or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the publicrecords: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, San Angelo Independent School District and County Education District #9 P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902 Grantee: Gustavo Cuellar, Jr., a single person 219 W Avenue R San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 18 of the L. T. Jones Subdivision of the East ½ of Block 140, Fort Concho Addition, Town of San Angelo, as described in Volume 377, Page 33, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. #15-29500-0140-004-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on _August 25, 1992, in Cause No. TAX90-0162B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated August 22, 1996, and recorded in Volume 545, Page 305, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
  • Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Each taxing unit that is entitled toreceive proceeds from the sale of the Property has consented to this sale and has authorized this sale by formalresolution. The parties acknowledge that the sale of the Property to Grantee does not constitute a violation ofSection 52, Article III, Texas Constitution. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2012, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:
  • Lot 18 of L.T. Jones Subdivision of the E 1/2of Block 140, Fort Concho Addition213 W Avenue R 45 x 100Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Mon Feb 13 2012 10:41:32 AM.
  • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 18 of the L.T. Jones Subdivision of the East 1/2 of Block 140, Fort Concho Addition, Town of San Angelo, as described in Volume 377, Page 33, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: TAX90-0162BLocation: Next to 209 W Avenue RParcel Size/Dimensions: 45 x 100City of San Angelo vs. Elvira M. VasquezTax ID Number: 15-29500-0140-004-00Judgment Date: August 25, 1992Date of Sheriffs Sale: July 15, 1996Sheriffs Deed Recorded: August 26, 1996Adjudge Value: $ 2,226.00PROPOSED Offer: $ 1,100.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.00% $ 350.00Maintenance Fee $ - 0.00% $ -District Clerk $ 365.38 $ 365.38 0.00% $ 365.38Sheriffs Fee $ 203.99 $ 203.99 0.00% $ 203.99Attorney Fee $ 89.57 $ 89.57 0.00% $ 89.57Municipal Liens $ 320.00 19.32% $ 17.59 $ 17.59Taxes $ 1,336.63 80.68% $ 73.47 $ 73.47Total $ 1,008.94 $ 1,656.63 $ 1,008.94 100.00% $ 91.06 $ 1,100.00Actual Total Amt Due $ 2,665.57Amount Remaining $ 91.06 Proposed Offer will satisfy the court cost and a portion of the taxes and liens.
  • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) WHEREAS, on the day of , 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting ofthe City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, there was presented to said Council theproposal for the City to sell a parcel of land situated within the city limits of the City of SanAngelo, said parcel being described as follows: Lot 18 of the L.T. Jones Subdivision of the East ½ of Block 140, Fort Concho Addition, Town of San Angelo, as described in Volume 377, Page 33, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. WHEREAS, said lot(s) are held by the City of San Angelo, as Trustee by virtue of Sheriff’sTax Deed, recorded on Volume 545, Page 305, of the Official Public Records of Real Property,Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of SanAngelo as Trustee to sell said lot(s) for an amount that is less than the lesser of the market valuespecified in the Judgment of foreclosure or the amount of the judgment(s) against said property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO: That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized in his capacityas representative of the City of San Angelo, as Trustee to execute a Quitclaim Deed to the abovedescribed lot(s) to GUSTAVO CUELLAR, JR., a single person, for the consideration of OneThousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,100.00) and that the sale for said amount is alsohereby authorized and approved.APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:_____________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:______________________ ____________________________Lysia Bowling, City Attorney Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Managerc:usersbryan.kendrickdesktop3-20-123gresolution.doc
  • W 50 of Lot 2, Block 3, C.C. Culwell Addition624 Culwell St 50 x 115Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Mon Feb 13 2012 12:36:48 PM.
  • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strikeany or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the publicrecords: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, San Angelo Independent School District and County Education District #9 P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902 Grantee: Gustavo and Rosa Martinez, husband and wife 622 Culwell Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): The west 50 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, C.C. Culwell Addition, as described in Volume 396, Page 453, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. #07-19800-0003-002-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on November 8, 1993, in Cause No.TAX93-0029B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated June 13, 1994, and recorded in Volume 435, Page 274, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
  • Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Each taxing unit that is entitled toreceive proceeds from the sale of the Property has consented to this sale and has authorized this sale by formalresolution. The parties acknowledge that the sale of the Property to Grantee does not constitute a violation ofSection 52, Article III, Texas Constitution. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2012, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:
  • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: The West 50 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, C.C. Cullwell Addtion , as described in Volume 396, Page 453, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: Tax93-0029BLocation: 624 Culwell StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 50 x 115City of San Angelo vs. The Unknown Heirs of Josephine S. AverittTax ID Number: 07-19800-0003-002-00Judgment Date: November 8, 1993Date of Sheriffs Sale: April 11, 1994Sheriffs Deed Recorded: June 17, 1994Adjudge Value: $ 1,170.00PROPOSED Offer: $ 1,000.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.00% $ 350.00Maintenance Fee $ - 0.00% $ -District Clerk $ 345.69 $ 345.69 0.00% $ 345.69Sheriffs Fee $ 145.10 $ 145.10 0.00% $ 145.10Attorney Fee $ - $ - 0.00% $ -Municipal Liens $ 172.88 25.45% $ 40.52 $ 40.52Taxes $ 506.33 74.55% $ 118.69 $ 118.69Total $ 840.79 $ 679.21 $ 840.79 100.00% $ 159.21 $ 1,000.00Actual Total Amt Due $ 1,520.00Amount Remaining $ 159.21 Proposed Offer will satisfy the court cost and a portion of the taxes and liens.
  • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) WHEREAS, on the day of , 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting ofthe City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, there was presented to said Council theproposal for the City to sell a parcel of land situated within the city limits of the City of SanAngelo, said parcel being described as follows: The West 50 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, C.C. Culwell Addition, as described in Volume 396, Page 453, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. WHEREAS, said lot(s) are held by the City of San Angelo, as Trustee by virtue of Sheriff’sTax Deed, recorded on Volume 435, Page 274, of the Official Public Records of Real Property,Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of SanAngelo as Trustee to sell said lot(s) for an amount that is less than the lesser of the market valuespecified in the Judgment of foreclosure or the amount of the judgment(s) against said property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO: That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized in his capacityas representative of the City of San Angelo, as Trustee to execute a Quitclaim Deed to the abovedescribed lot(s) to GUSTAVO & ROSA MARTINEZ, a married couple, for the consideration ofOne Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) and that the sale for said amount is also herebyauthorized and approved.APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:_____________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:______________________ ____________________________Lysia Bowling, City Attorney Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Managerc:usersbryan.kendrickdesktop3-20-123hresolution.doc
  • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strikeany or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the publicrecords: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, San Angelo Independent School District and County Education District #9 P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902 Grantee: Julia and Jose Luis Gonzalez, husband and wife 2406 Tulane Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76904 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 10, Block 14, Lasker Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 596, Page 709, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Acct. #16-31200-0014-010-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on December 8, 1997, in Cause No. B-95-0037-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated October 26, 1998, and recorded in Volume 671, Page 152, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
  • Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Each taxing unit that is entitled toreceive proceeds from the sale of the Property has consented to this sale and has authorized this sale by formalresolution. The parties acknowledge that the sale of the Property to Grantee does not constitute a violation ofSection 52, Article III, Texas Constitution. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2012, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:
  • Lot 10, Block 14, Lasker Addition112 W 16th Street 50 x 140Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Tue Feb 14 2012 03:27:25 PM.
  • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 10, Block 14, Lasker Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 596, Page 709, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: B-95-0037-TLocation: 112 W 16th StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 50 x 140City of San Angelo vs. J.D. MooreTax ID Number: 16-31200-0014-010-00Judgment Date: December 8, 1997Date of Sheriffs Sale: July 9, 1998Sheriffs Deed Recorded: October 29, 1998Adjudge Value: $ 2,500.00PROPOSED Offer: $ 1,100.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.00% $ 350.00Maintenance Fee $ - 0.00% $ -District Clerk $ 456.69 $ 456.69 0.00% $ 456.69Sheriffs Fee $ 120.61 $ 120.61 0.00% $ 120.61Attorney Fee $ 90.96 $ 90.96 0.00% $ 90.96Municipal Liens $ 11.00 0.60% $ 0.49 $ 0.49Taxes $ 1,820.74 99.40% $ 81.25 $ 81.25Total $ 1,018.26 $ 1,831.74 $ 1,018.26 100.00% $ 81.74 $ 1,100.00Actual Total Amt Due $ 2,850.00Amount Remaining $ 81.74 Proposed Offer will satisfy the court cost and a portion of the taxes and liens.
  • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) WHEREAS, on the day of , 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting ofthe City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, there was presented to said Council theproposal for the City to sell a parcel of land situated within the city limits of the City of SanAngelo, said parcel being described as follows: Lot 10, Block 14, Lasker Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 596, Page 709, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. WHEREAS, said lot(s) are held by the City of San Angelo, as Trustee by virtue of Sheriff’sTax Deed, recorded on Volume 671, Page 152, of the Official Public Records of Real Property,Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of SanAngelo as Trustee to sell said lot(s) for an amount that is less than the lesser of the market valuespecified in the Judgment of foreclosure or the amount of the judgment(s) against said property;and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO: That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized in his capacityas representative of the City of San Angelo, as Trustee to execute a Quitclaim Deed to the abovedescribed lot(s) to JULIA & JOSE LUIS GONZALEZ , a married couple, for the considerationof One Thousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,100.00) and the sale for said amount isalso hereby authorized and approved.APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:_____________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:______________________ ____________________________Lysia Bowling, City Attorney Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Managerc:usersbryan.kendrickdesktop3-20-123iresolution.doc
  • Lot 15, Block 53, Miles Addition24 W 11th Street 50 x 100Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Tue Feb 14 2012 03:35:27 PM.
  • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strikeany or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the publicrecords: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, San Angelo Independent School District and County Education District #9 P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902 Grantee: Juan and Laura Murillo, husband and wife 12 W. 11th Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 15, Block 53, Miles Addition, as described in Volume 334, Page 265, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Acct. #19-34200-0053-013-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on April 22, 1996, in Cause No. B-94-0062-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated October 26, 1998, and recorded in Volume 671, Page 132, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
  • Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Each taxing unit that is entitled toreceive proceeds from the sale of the Property has consented to this sale and has authorized this sale by formalresolution. The parties acknowledge that the sale of the Property to Grantee does not constitute a violation ofSection 52, Article III, Texas Constitution. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2012, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:City Attorney’s Office
  • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 15, Block 53, Miles Addition, as described in Volume 334, Page 265, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: B-94-0062-TLocation: 24 E 11th StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 50 x 100City of San Angelo vs. J.C. ClayTax ID Number: 19-34200-0053-013-00Judgment Date: April 22, 1996Date of Sheriffs Sale: July 9, 1998Sheriffs Deed Recorded: October 29, 1998Adjudge Value: $ 2,500.00PROPOSED Offer: $ 1,000.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.00% $ 350.00Maintenance Fee $ - 0.00% $ -District Clerk $ 267.69 $ 267.69 0.00% $ 267.69Sheriffs Fee $ 120.61 $ 120.61 0.00% $ 120.61Attorney Fee $ 63.06 $ 63.06 0.00% $ 63.06Municipal Liens $ 1,142.93 55.79% $ 110.82 $ 110.82Taxes $ 905.71 44.21% $ 87.82 $ 87.82Total $ 801.36 $ 2,048.64 $ 801.36 100.00% $ 198.64 $ 1,000.00Actual Total Amt Due $ 2,850.00Amount Remaining $ 198.64 Proposed Offer will satisfy the court cost and a portion of the taxes and liens.
  • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment) WHEREAS, on the day of , 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting ofthe City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, there was presented to said Council theproposal for the City to sell a parcel of land situated within the city limits of the City of SanAngelo, said parcel being described as follows: Lot 15, Block 53, Miles Addition, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 334, Page 265, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. WHEREAS, said lot(s) are held by the City of San Angelo, as Trustee by virtue of Sheriff’sTax Deed, recorded on Volume 671, Page 132, of the Official Public Records of Real Property,Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of SanAngelo as Trustee to sell said lot(s) for an amount that is less than the lesser of the market valuespecified in the Judgment of foreclosure or the amount of the judgment(s) against said property; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO: That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized in his capacityas representative of the City of San Angelo, as Trustee to execute a Quitclaim Deed to the abovedescribed lot(s) to JUAN & LAURA MURILLO, a married couple, for the consideration of OneThousand and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) and that the sale for said amount is also herebyauthorized and approved.APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:_____________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:______________________ ____________________________Lysia Bowling, City Attorney Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Managerc:usersbryan.kendrickdesktop3-20-123jresolution.doc
  • City of San AngeloMemo Date: March 13, 2012 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Elizabeth Grindstaff, Assistant City Manager Subject: Agenda Item for March 20, 2012 Council Meeting Contact: Elizabeth Grindstaff, 325.657.4241 Caption: Consent Agenda Item Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the sale to First United Methodist Church, landlord, of tenant improvements and fixtures installed by the City of San Angelo, Tenant, to the leased office building located at 106 S. Chadbourne, for $125,000.00, and authorizing the Interim City Manager or his designee to execute a bill of sale and related documents necessary to complete the sale and transfer When the City of San Angelo (City) leased the “Old WTU Building” from First United Methodist Church (FUMC), there was not a working chiller to provide air Summary: conditioning for the building. The purchase of a chiller was necessary to occupy the building, but FUMC did not want to expend the necessary funds, and the City agreed to do so at its own risk. However, the lease agreement between the City and FUMC stated that FUMC would have an option to later purchase the Chiller from the City when the City Hall Complex rehabilitation was complete. In December of 2011, a representative of FUMC contacted City staff to discuss the possibility of the chiller and other improvements staying with the building after the expiration of the lease. City staff began discussions to determine a fair price for the chiller, boiler, and the other improvements, as the various equipment and their functionality within the building are of greater value to FUMC than the limited salvageable parts would be to any other entity. More important, there would be additional costs incurred by the City if the equipment was removed from the building (i.e. crane rental for lifting and removing the chiller from the roof, capping the existing lines off into the building, disconnecting and transporting the boiler from the alley way, storing at some location, winterizing the water chambers in both equipments, cost of advertising, bidding and selling the equipment for salvage, etc.) A price of $125,000 was ultimately agreed upon by both parties, taking into account original purchase prices and depreciation. History: The City of San Angelo (City) has been leasing the “Old WTU Building” located at 106 S. Chadbourne from the First United Methodist Church (FUMC) since November 1, 2009. In the original agreement, the City agreed to purchase and install a new Chiller to provide cooling for the building. The existing chiller was determined to be irreparable by our consulting engineer. A design and specifications to install a new chiller were prepared and bid. The purchase was made by the City and equipment installed. Approximately two weeks after the City occupied the building for temporary municipal offices, the existing boiler failed. Staff once again worked with the consulting engineer to specify a replacement boiler, bid, purchased and installed the equipment. Repairs to the main sewer line leading from the building to the Citys main sewer line located in the alley were necessary to make the sewer system operational and were constructed by City crews. CAT 5 cable was installed to support the Citys IT and Phone systems.
  • Electrical, lighting, and plumbing equipment were installed, repaired and made operational.Financial Impact: Revenue to the City of San Angelo in the amount of $125,000.00 to be used for other needs of the City Hall Complex ProjectRelated Vision Item NA(if applicable):Other Information/ Staff recommends City Council approval of the sale of the equipmentRecommendation:Attachments: Resolution and Bill of SalePresentation: NAPublication: NAReviewed by NADirector:Approved by Legal:
  • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE SALE TO FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, LANDLORD, OF TENANT IMPROVEMENTS AND FIXTURES INSTALLED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TENANT, TO THE LEASED OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT 106 S. CHADBOURNE, FOR $125,000.00, AND AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A BILL OF SALE AND RELATED DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE SALE AND TRANSFER. WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo, Tenant, and First United Methodist Churchof San Angelo, Landlord, entered into a Lease Agreement effective November 1, 2009for the office building located at 106 S. Chadbourne; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Lease Agreement provision was made forthe installation of certain fixtures and permanent improvements by City to the leasedbuilding, and for the sale of said fixtures and improvements to Landlord upon terminationof the lease; and, WHEREAS, in consideration of One Hundred Twenty-five ThousandDollars ($125,000.00), City, Tenant under said Lease Agreement shall convey toLandlord the fixtures and permanent improvements that City installed to theleased office building, described as: 1. Air cooled chiller and space heating and boiler equipment including: a. One York YLAA0120SG 120-ton air cooled chiller with four Hermetic scroll compressors and crankcase heaters; b. One Delta Limited™-Type H Space Heating/Hot Water Boiler, Models 989B-2339B; 2. Upgraded Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing systems throughout leased premises; 3. Information technology wiring throughout leased premises; and, 4. Sewer line replacement from main line tap to leased premises WHEREAS, the highest value for the described fixtures and permanentimprovements is their value in place as opposed to their salvage value. The statedconsideration is a reasonable value for the described fixtures and permanentimprovements in place which are surplus property of the City at termination of the Leaseterm. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT: The Interim City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute a Bill ofSale to First United Methodist Church of San Angelo, a Texas non-profit corporation,Landlord, for the sum of $125,000.00, for the conveyance of certain tenant fixtures and
  • improvements installed by City to the leased premises and office building located at 106S. Chadbourne, San Angelo, Texas, said fixtures and improvements being described as: 1. Air cooled chiller and space heating and boiler equipment including: a. One York YLAA0120SG 120-ton air cooled chiller with four Hermetic scroll compressors and crankcase heaters; b. One Delta Limited™-Type H Space Heating/Hot Water Boiler, Models 989B-2339B; 2. Upgraded Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing systems throughout leased premises; 3. Information technology wiring throughout leased premises; and, 4. Sewer line replacement from main line tap to leased premises PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2012. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXASATTEST: Alvin New, MayorAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkAPPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORMElizabeth Grindstaff Lysia H. BowlingAssistant City Manager City Attorney
  • BILL OF SALEEffective Date: May 1, 2012Tenant/ Seller: City of San Angelo, Texas, a Texas home rule municipal corporation P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902Landlord/ Buyer: First United Methodist Church of San Angelo, a Texas nonprofit corporation 37 E. Beauregard San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903Description of Permanent Improvements and Fixtures Sold:Those certain Permanent Improvements and Fixtures affixed to the office building located at 106 S.Chadbourne, San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, occupied by Seller as Tenant under LeaseAgreement with First United Methodist Church of San Angelo, “Landlord”, being more particularlydescribed as: 1. Installation of air cooled chiller and space heating and boiler equipment described as: a. One York YLAA0120SG 120-ton air cooled chiller with four Hermetic scroll compressors and crankcase heaters; b. One Delta Limited™-Type H Space Heating/Hot Water Boiler, Models 989B-2339B; 2. Upgrade Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing systems throughout leased premises; 3. Install information technology wiring throughout leased premises; and 4. Sewer Line Replacement from Main line tap to leased premisesConsideration: By the execution hereof, Tenant/Seller acknowledges receipt of: One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($125,000.00), as full consideration for the described Permanent Improvements and Fixtures.NOW THEREFORE for the good and valuable consideration set forth herein, the receipt and sufficiencyof which is acknowledged, effective May 1, 2012, Tenant/Seller hereby sells and conveys in place toLandlord/Buyer all of Tenant/Seller’s right, title and interest in and to the Fixtures above described; and,Tenant/Seller covenants with Landlord/Buyer that Tenant/Seller is the lawful owner of the Fixtures, that itis free from all encumbrances, that Tenant/Seller has good right to sell the Property, and thatTenant/Seller will warrant and defend the same against the lawful claims and demands of all personslawfully claiming or to claim the same when the claim is by, through, or under Tenant/Seller, but nototherwise.The Permanent Improvements and Fixtures are sold, transferred and conveyed by Tenant/Seller toLandlord/Buyer “AS IS” AND “WHERE IS”, affixed to the office building which is the subject of thedescribed Lease Agreement, without warranty, expressed or implied. Landlord/Buyer has been advised tocarefully inspect the Permanent Improvements and Fixtures or to obtain inspection from such qualifiedpersons as Landlord/Buyer deems necessary.
  • AS A MATERIAL PART OF THE CONSIDERATION THE DESCRIBED PERMANENTIMPROVEMENTS AND FIXTURES ARE SOLD AND TRANSFERRED "AS-IS" AND “WHEREIS” WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE CONDITION ORSUITABILITY FOR USE OF THE PROPERTY. BY ACCEPTING THIS BILL OF SALE,LANDLORD/BUYER REPRESENTS THAT: LANDLORD/BUYER IS NOT RELYING ON ANYREPRESENTATION OF TENANT/SELLER; THAT LANDLORD/BUYER HAS HADADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT THE PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS ANDFIXTURES AFFIXED TO THE DESCRIBED OFFICE BUILDING OR TO HAVE THEPROPERTY INSPECTED; THAT LANDLORD/BUYER IS RELYING UPONLANDLORD/BUYER’S INSPECTION OF THE PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS ANDFIXTURES; AND THAT LANDLORD/BUYER ACCEPTS THE PERMANENTIMPROVEMENTS AND FIXTURES "AS-IS" AND “WHERE IS”.ATTEST: CITY OF SAN ANGELO, Tenant/Seller: By:Alicia Ramirez Michael Dane, Interim City ManagerSTATE OF TEXAS §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____ day of ________________, 2012, byMichael Dane, Interim City Manager of the CITY OF SAN ANGELO, a Texas home rule municipalcorporation, on behalf of said corporation pursuant to resolution of its governing body. Notary Public, State of TexasACCEPTANCE OF LANDLORD/BUYER:Landlord/Buyer hereby accepts the described Permanent Improvements and Fixtures “AS IS” and“WHERE IS”, and takes possession thereof on the terms and conditions herein stated. FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF SAN ANGELO By: Its:STATE OF TEXAS §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____ day of ________________, 2012, by________________________, as _____________________ of the FIRST UNITED METHODISTCHURCH OF SAN ANGELO, a Texas non-profit corporation, on behalf of said corporation pursuant toresolution of its Board of Directors. Notary Public, State of Texas
  • MEMORANDUMDate: March 9, 2012To: Mayor and CouncilmembersFrom: Luis Elguezabal, A.A.E., Airport DirectorSubject: Consideration for March 20, 2012 meetingContact: Luis Elguezabal, A.A.E., Airport, extension-1010Caption: Consent Agenda: CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A CONCESSIONAIRE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND ABOVE THE CLOUDS, LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $300.00 PER MONTH OR 5% OF GROSS RECIPTS WHICHEVER IS GREATER AT THE SAN ANGELO REGIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING.History: City staff received a request from Above the Clouds, LLC. for the leasing of 475 square feet of concessionaire space for use as a café and 194 square feet of storage space, for a combined total of 669 square feet, formerly operated by Sister’s Cafe, located at the airport’s terminal building.Summary: The proposed lease will be for a five year term, beginning April 1, 2012 and ending March 31, 2017, with a one year renewal option. All of the terms and rates coincide with the airport’s approved rates and charges.Financial Impact: Rental fees of $300.00 per month minimum or 5% of gross receipts, whichever is greater, will result in $18,000.00, minimum, over the five year term.Related Vision Item: Provide Adequate Amenities for the Airport.Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends approval.Attachments: Concessionaire Lease and License AgreementPresentation: NonePublication: NoneReviewed by Director: Luis Elguezabal, A.A.E., Airport, 03-09-12
  • LEASE AND LICENSE AGREEMENT This Lease and License Agreement (“Lease”) is made and entered into by andbetween the CITY OF SAN ANGELO, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, actingby and through its duly authorized representative (“Lessor”), and Above The Clouds,LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Lessee”). In consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and conditionsherein contained, and other valuable consideration, Lessor and Lessee hereby agree asfollows:1. DEMISE OF LEASED PREMISES Lessor does hereby lease to Lessee, and Lessee does hereby lease from Lessorthe following: 475 square feet of concessionaire space for use as a café and 194 square feet of storage space, for a combined total of 669 square feet, more or less, located in the terminal building, 8618 Terminal Circle Road, San Angelo Regional Airport – Mathis Field ("Leased Premises" or “Premises”), commonly known as Suites 111, and further identified in the terminal building floor plan, which is available for review in the office of the Airport Director.2. GRANT OF LICENSE 2.1 Lessor hereby grants Lessee a non-exclusive license, concurrent with the herein-described Lease, to engage in the business of selling and serving quality beverages and food to the general and traveling public by operating a food service facility at the San Angelo Regional Airport – Mathis Field (“Airport”). 2.2 Lessee shall confine its operations at the Airport to its exclusive area and to those portions of the terminal that are designated by the Airport Director. Lessee shall not solicit sales in any exclusive area leased to another lessee located at the Airport. 2.3 In the event of a conflict between Lessee and any other lessee or concessionaire in the terminal building as to the services to be sold by respective concessionaires or lessees, Lessor shall decide which services may be sold by each lessee and Lessee agrees to be bound by such decision.
  • 3. TERM 3.1 Fixed Beginning and Termination Date. This Lease is granted for a term of five (5) years commencing April 1, 2012, and ending March 31, 2017. 3.2 Lessor reserves the right to review financial statements, business records, and all documents created in the course of operation or maintained by the Lessee for any purpose whatsoever but primarily intended to confirm the reported numbers for purposes of determining appropriate rentals. Either party may terminate this Lease upon providing thirty (30) days written notice to the other party or by mutual agreement. If this Lease is terminated in accordance with this paragraph, rent shall be prorated accordingly. 3.3 Option to Renew. At termination of the primary term of this Lease, Lessee shall have the option to renew this Lease for one additional one (1) year period, under the same terms, conditions and covenants contained herein, provided that Lessee is not then in default of any term, condition or covenant in this Lease and further provided that Lessor is not prohibited from leasing said property pursuant to any agreement with or requirement from the United States government such as those situations described in Article 6 of this Lease. Lessee shall exercise the option to renew this Lease by notifying Lessor in writing and delivering such writing to Lessor at the address specified in the paragraph entitled "NOTICES" at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the primary term. 3.4 Holdover. Any holding over by Lessee of the Leased Premises after the expiration of this Lease shall operate and be construed only as a tenancy from month to month, terminable at the will of Lessor.4. CONSIDERATION 4.1 Rent. Lessee shall pay rent to Lessor for the use of Leased Premises on a monthly basis as follows: For the period: Base Rent per Month: 4/1/2012 through 3/31/2017 $300.00 or 5% of Gross Receipts, whichever is greater “Gross receipts” shall mean all revenues that would be recognized annually under generally accepted accounting principles less any State sales tax to be paid, without deduction for cost of property sold, materials used, labor performed, or other costs incurred. A report of Gross Receipts for the preceding month shall be submitted on the form set forth in Exhibit -2-
  • B attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes and accompany all payments beginning April 30, 2012. 4.2 Time. The first of such payments shall be due and payable on May 1, 2012, and subsequent payments shall be due and payable no later than the 10th day of each succeeding month thereafter with the last payment being due and payable on April 30, 2017. 4.3 Place of Payment. All such payments shall be made at the Airport Director’s office at San Angelo Regional Airport – Mathis Field, 8618 Terminal Circle, San Angelo, Texas 76904, or at such other place as Lessor may from time to time designate by written notice to Lessee. 4.4 Delinquent Payments. Lessee shall pay to Lessor a late charge or interest for any rent received by Lessor after the date that the rent is due in accordance with established City ordinances provided, however, that this provision for late charges or interest shall not be construed as a waiver of the right of Lessor to terminate this Lease at its option as authorized herein. 4.5 Records/Audits. The financial records of Lessee related to the operation of the Leased Premises herein, including but not limited to, receipts, daily cash and sales reports, purchase invoices and inventories shall be made available to Lessor upon request for audit purposes.5. DEBTS RELATED TO LEASED PREMISES 5.1 Costs of Operation. Lessee agrees to bear, at its own expense, all costs of operating its business and all other costs connected with the use of Leased Premises and facilities. 5.2 Taxes and Assessments. It is further understood and agreed that Lessee shall pay and discharge all taxes, general and special assessments and other charges of every description which during the term of this Lease may be levied on or assessed against the Leased Premises and all interest therein and all improvements thereon, whether belonging to Lessor or Lessee, or to which either of them may become liable. Lessee shall pay all such taxes, charges and assessments to the public officer charged with the collection thereof not less than fifteen (15) days before the same shall become delinquent, and Lessee agrees to indemnify and save harmless Lessor from all such taxes, charges and assessments. 5.3 Incidental Fees. Lessee shall also pay or cause to be paid all incidental charges, such as permit fees, incurred in connection with its operation and use of the Leased Premises. -3-
  • 6. LAWS, REGULATIONS AND LIMITATIONS 6.1 Observance. Lessee agrees to observe and obey all applicable federal, state and local laws in performing this Lease, including, but not limited to, such requirements in regard to discharge of effluents into Lessors wastewater and collection system or other methods of disposal. Furthermore, Lessee agrees to observe and obey all Airport rules and regulations promulgated and enforced by the City of San Angelo and by any other governmental authority having jurisdiction over the conduct of operations at the Airport. Lessee shall indemnify and hold harmless Lessor, its councilmembers, board and commission members, officials, agents and employees, from any charges, fines or penalties that may be assessed or levied by any department or agency of the United States or of the State of Texas by reason of Lessees failure to comply with this paragraph. This is in addition to and not in lieu of any other covenant contained herein. 6.2 Lease Limited. It is agreed that this Lease shall be limited, notwithstanding its terms, by the provision of any existing or future agreement between Lessor and the United States government, relative to the operation or maintenance of the Airport, the execution of which has been or may be required as a condition precedent to the expenditures of federal funds for the development of the Airport. 6.3 Wastewater. If Lessee’s use of the Leased Premises results in the discharge or potential discharge of waste water, Lessee shall immediately apply to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”) for a waste water discharge permit. Lessee shall also advise the Airport Director which drains or other waste water facilities Lessee will use in disposing of waste waters. The Airport Director may designate sewers or other facilities for Lessee to use for disposal of waste water. 6.4 Hazardous Waste/Contaminants. Lessee agrees that it will not cause or permit release of any hazardous substances or contaminants, either intentional or accidental by act or omission, onto the Leased Premises or Airport property. If any release does occur, Lessee shall immediately notify the Airport Director and the TCEQ in writing and shall comply with any cleanup provision issued. Lessee shall be completely liable for any consequences of such a release. Lessee warrants that it has inspected the Leased Premises and that there are no hazardous wastes or contaminants located thereon. Lessee understands that it shall remove any hazardous waste or contaminant from the Leased Premises before termination of this Lease. -4-
  • 6.5 National Emergency. During a time of war or national emergency, Lessor reserves the right to alter, amend or suspend this Lease upon demand of military, naval, or other proper authorities of the United States government.6.6 No Discrimination. Lessee agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, national origin or sex. Lessee agrees it will not violate any federal, state or local civil rights or discrimination laws.6.7 Affirmative Action. Lessee agrees to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are tested during employment without regard to race, creed, color, national origin or sex. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship.6.8 Compliance with ADA. Lessee agrees to comply fully with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.6.9 Termination. A finding of violation of any laws by a trial court or appropriate state or federal agency is a material breach of this Lease which may result in the termination of this Lease or such other remedy as Lessor may deem appropriate.6.10 Records. Lessee agrees that it will keep or cause to be kept true, accurate and complete records of business conducted and that Lessor shall have the right, through its duly authorized agents or representatives, to examine all pertinent records at reasonable times. Failure to maintain and present true and accurate records shall constitute a material breach of this Lease. Once each twelve month period Lessor may require and Lessee shall pay for and have performed an audit by a certified public accountant to be agreed upon by both Lessee and Lessor. Failure to provide a full and accurate audit upon request shall constitute a breach of this Lease.6.11 Relationships. Lessee, its agents, servants and employees agree to maintain a friendly and cooperative, though competitive, relationship with other companies engaged in similar or like business on the Airport. Except in connection with judicial proceedings, Lessee shall not engage in open public disputes, disagreements, or conflicts regarding activities at the Airport which would tend to deteriorate the quality of the service of Lessee or its competitors or which would be incompatible with the best interest of the public at the Airport. -5-
  • 6.12 Breach. Failure of Lessee to abide by any and/or all terms of this Article 6 shall constitute a material breach of this Lease, whereupon Lessor may, in its discretion, immediately terminate this Lease, in addition to any other remedies reserved to Lessor under the terms of this Lease.7. CONDITION AND USE OF LEASED PREMISES 7.1 No Warranty. LESSOR GIVES NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE CONDITION OF THE LEASED PREMISES, OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, INCLUDING WARRANTY OF HABITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE. 7.2 Acceptance and Use. Lessor and Lessee agree that the Leased Premises will be used for the purposes described in Article 2 of this Lease. Lessee accepts Leased Premises as suitable for such purpose. 7.3 Transfer, Assignment and Subletting. Except as otherwise provided herein, Lessee shall not transfer, assign, sublet, license, encumber or pledge the Leased Premises or this Lease, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the Lessor. 7.4 Lessee covenants and agrees as follows: 7.4.1 to furnish good, prompt and efficient service, adequate to meet all reasonable demands for such service at the Airport, on a fair and reasonable basis as follows: 7.4.1.1 food, beverages and coffee to the public. Prior to sale of any food or beverage Lessee shall submit a food and beverage price list to the Airport Director for approval. Sale of food or beverages without prior approval of the price list or for a price greater than the approved price shall constitute a breach of this Lease, and 7.4.2 to hire and retain at all times a sufficient number of employees to provide prompt and efficient service. All employees having contact with the public shall be courteous, clean and neat in appearance. Should any employee fail to maintain such qualifications, Lessee, upon written notice from Lessor, shall take immediate corrective action. 7.4.3 to be open Sunday through Friday not later than six a.m. (6:00 a.m.). -6-
  • 7.4.4 to be open until at least eleven in the morning (11:00 a.m.) on Monday through Friday and until six in the evening (6:00 p.m.) on Sunday. 7.5 Improvements and Modifications. Lessee shall make no improvements and/or modifications, nor add any signs, to the Leased Premises without the prior written consent of Airport Director. The Airport Director may not unreasonably withhold its consent with regard to any non-structural, interior alteration that Lessee proposes. No construction shall be commenced within or upon the Leased Premises until such proposed construction is approved in writing by Lessor and, if applicable, the Federal Aviation Administration, and any attempted construction commenced prior to receipt by Lessee of such written approval(s) shall, at the option of Lessor, constitute a breach of this Lease by Lessee. 7.7 Ingress and Egress. Lessee and its employees, patrons, guests, invitees, contractors and subcontractors, shall have the right of ingress to and egress from the Leased Premises and the right, in common with others so authorized, to use common areas of the Airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, navigational facilities, roadways, parking areas, etc., subject to federal, state, city and Airport rules and regulations. 7.8 Noise Abatement. Lessee shall actively participate in and comply with all noise abatement procedures, policies and programs as set forth by Lessor.8. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 8.1 Lessee’s Duties. 8.1.1 Lessee will be responsible for the repair and maintenance of the equipment and improvements that are presently located or to be constructed or installed on the Leased Premises. Failure to do so will be grounds for Lessor to perform the needed repairs and/or maintenance and recover the costs from Lessee. 8.1.2 Lessee further agrees to keep and maintain the Leased Premises in a neat, clean, safe and respectable condition, by prompt removal of all trash, litter, debris and junk, and will keep said Leased Premises cleared of all objectionable matter. Piling of boxes, cartons, barrels or other similar items, in an unsightly or unsafe manner, on or about the Leased Premises, is prohibited. 8.1.3 In the event Lessee shall fail to keep said Premises in a manner acceptable to the Airport Director as set forth herein, Lessor may immediately terminate the Lease. -7-
  • 8.2 Lessor’s Duties. 8.2.1 Lessor will maintain and operate the Airport in compliance with the safety and security regulations established by the Federal Aviation Administration and other appropriate regulatory authorities. 8.2.2 Lessor will maintain and operate the Airport with adequate and efficient personnel, keep in good repair Airport, its appurtenances and facilities, and keep it and its approaches free from obstruction, congestion and interference for safe, convenient and proper use by Lessee.8.3 Damage or Destruction of Leased Premises. 8.3.1 Lessor shall maintain in good condition the structural parts of the building and other improvements housing the Leased Premises (including, without limitation, the roof, foundation and bearing and exterior walls, but excluding windows, window glass, plate glass, doors, pest control and extermination) and the parking lot, drives, sidewalks and common areas. 8.3.2 If the Leased Premises, and/or any portion of the Airport property adjacent thereto, is partially damaged by fire, explosion, the elements, the public enemy, or other casualty, caused by or attributable to Lessee’s activities conducted at or upon the Leased Premises, but the Leased Premises is not rendered untenantable, any property so damaged will be repaired with due diligence by Lessee at its own cost and expense. 8.3.3 If the damage as set forth in the preceding 8.3.2 shall be so extensive as to render such Leased Premises untenantable, but capable of being repaired in thirty (30) days, the same shall be repaired with due diligence by Lessee at its own cost and expense, and the rent payable herein shall be abated in proportion to the diminished utility of the Leased Premises in the conduct of Lessee’s business from the time the damage occurs until such time as the Leased Premises is fully restored. 8.3.4 In the event the Leased Premises, and/or any portion of the Airport property adjacent thereto, is completely destroyed by fire, explosion, the elements, the public enemy or other casualty, caused by or attributable to Lessee’s activities conducted at or upon the premises, such that the Leased Premises will remain untenantable, in whole or in part, for more than thirty (30) days, any -8-
  • property so damaged shall be repaired with due diligence by Lessee at its own cost and expense. 8.3.4.1 Lessee shall repair any such damage at its cost and expense with due diligence; and the rent payable herein shall be abated in proportion to the diminished utility of the Leased Premises in the conduct of Lessee’s business from the time the damage occurs until Lessee completes the restoration. 8.3.4.2 If Lessee fails to complete the restoration of the Leased Premises with all reasonable due diligence, Lessor may give Lessee written notice of its immediate termination of this Lease in its entirety. 8.3.5 In the event the Leased Premises, and/or any portion of the Airport property adjacent thereto, is damaged due to fire, explosion, the elements, the public enemy or other casualty not caused by or attributable to Lessee’s activities conducted at or upon the premises, regardless of severity, Lessor may, in its sole discretion, either repair such damage or give Lessee written notice of its immediate termination of this Lease in its entirety. 8.4 Right of Inspection. Lessor reserves the right to conduct inspections, at reasonable times, of the Leased Premises to ensure that fire, safety, and sanitation regulations and other provisions contained in this Lease are being adhered to by the Lessee.9. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION REQUIREMENTS See Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes.10. TERMINATION OF LEASE 10.1 Abandonment/Default. In the event Lessee shall (1) abandon the Leased Premises or (2) default in performance of any of the covenants and conditions required herein to be kept and performed by Lessee and such default continues for or is not corrected within a period of thirty (30) days, except for those provisions authorizing immediate termination, Lessor shall have the right to terminate this Lease. Likewise, if Lessor shall default under the terms of this Lease; and such default continues for a period of thirty (30) days, Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Lease. Lessor or Lessee shall give thirty (30) days written notice of its intention to terminate the lease and either party will have such thirty (30) days within which to cure such default and thereby avoid termination. Notice shall be sufficient if given in accordance with the notice provision in -9-
  • this Lease and delivered to either party at the address specified in this Lease or at such other address as has been designated in writing. Upon Lessors or Lessees election to terminate, this Lease shall cease.10.2 Re-Entry by Lessor. Upon termination of this Lease, Lessor may re-enter and take immediate possession of the Leased Premises and remove Lessees effects, with or without process of law, without being deemed guilty of trespassing. Lessor shall not be liable for damages by reason of re-entry.10.3 Possession. Lessee agrees at the termination of this Lease to deliver possession peacefully to the Lessor or its agents or employees; and if it fails to give peaceful possession, Lessor may take forceful possession of Leased Premises and eject all parties therefrom without being guilty of trespass; and all resulting damages are hereby waived.10.4 Attorney’s Fees and Expenses. In the event of the breach of any of the covenants, conditions or obligations contained herein by the Lessee, or if it becomes necessary for the Lessor to use the services of an attorney to enforce its rights accruing as a result of such default, Lessee agrees to pay Lessor reasonable attorneys fees and all costs of court and expenses incurred as a result thereof.10.5 Other Remedies. Any termination of this Lease arising from Lessees default shall not relieve Lessee from the payment of any sum or sums that are due and payable to Lessor under this Lease or any claim for damages then or thereafter accruing against Lessee under this Lease. Any such termination shall not prevent Lessor from enforcing the payment of any such sum or sums or claim for damages by any remedy provided for by law, or from recovering damages from Lessee for any default under this Lease. All rights, options, and remedies of Lessor contained in this Lease or otherwise shall be construed and held to be cumulative, and no one of them shall be exclusive of the other; and Lessor shall have the right to pursue any one or all of such remedies or any other remedy or relief which may be provided by law, whether or not stated in this Lease. No waiver by Lessor of a breach of any of the covenants, conditions, or restrictions of this Lease shall be construed or held to be a waiver of any succeeding or preceding breach of the same or any other covenant, condition or restriction contained in this Lease.10.6 Removal of Improvements. All equipment, machinery, trade fixtures, and other non-attached improvements installed on the Leased Premises by Lessee shall remain the property of Lessee and may be removed at the termination of this Lease, provided Lessee is not then in default in the performance of any of its obligations or covenants herein contained, and provided further that such removal will do no damage to the realty upon - 10 -
  • which such items are situated. It is understood and agreed, however, that improvements shall be held by the Lessor until all rentals due Lessor by Lessee shall have been paid, and should any amount remain unpaid for more than thirty (30) days after termination of this Lease, the Lessor shall have the right to sell such improvements and apply the proceeds to the amount due Lessor, with interest at the annual rate of ten percent (10%), and to any costs incident to the sale, and pay the balance remaining, if any, to Lessee. All structural changes, major installations or additions made to the building by Lessee shall remain for the benefit of and become property of Lessor, unless otherwise provided by written consent. All property remaining on the Leased Premises after the expiration of thirty (30) days following the termination of this Lease, however terminated, shall be deemed abandoned by Lessee and shall become the property of Lessor.11. MISCELLANEOUS 11.1 Relationship of Lessor and Lessee. The relationship between Lessor and Lessee at all times shall remain solely that of landlord and tenant and shall not be deemed a partnership or joint venture. 11.2 Parties Bound. This Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties of the lease and their respective successors and assigns. 11.3 Headings. The paragraph headings contained herein are for convenience and reference and are not intended to define, extend or limit the scope of any provision of this Lease. 11.4 Entire Agreement/Amendments. This Lease constitutes the entire agreement between the parties; and Lessor is not bound by any agreement, condition or stipulation, understanding or representation made by any of Lessors agents not contained herein. No amendment to this Lease shall be effective unless such is in writing and signed by both parties. 11.5 Texas Law to Apply/Venue. The parties hereby agree that Texas law will control the interpretation or enforcement of this Lease. This Lease has been executed in Texas, and all obligations hereunder are performable in Tom Green County, Texas. Venue shall be proper in a court of appropriate jurisdiction in Tom Green County, Texas. 11.6 Invalid or Illegal Provisions. If any one or more provisions of this Lease are for any reason held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the invalidity, illegality or unenforceability will not affect any other provision of this Lease which will be construed as if it had not included the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provisions. - 11 -
  • 11.7 Notices. Any formal notice required or permitted under this Lease shall be deemed sufficiently given if it is in writing and personally delivered, sent by overnight express delivery service or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid and sent by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) to the party to whom said notice is to be given. Notices delivered in person, or by overnight express delivery service, shall be deemed to be served effective as of the date the notice is delivered. Notices sent by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) shall be deemed to be served seventy-two (72) hours after the date said notice is postmarked to the addressee, postage prepaid. Until changed by written notice given by one party to the other, the addresses of the parties shall be as follows: LESSOR: CITY OF SAN ANGELO San Angelo Regional Airport – Mathis Field Attn: Airport Director 8618 Terminal Circle San Angelo, Texas 76904 LESSEE: Above The Clouds, LLC Attn: Sherry L. DeMory 8618 Terminal Circle Rd., Suite 1114 San Angelo, Texas 76904 [Signature Page to Follow] - 12 -
  • EXECUTED in duplicate originals on the dates specified below.ATTEST: LESSOR: City of San Angelo, A Texas home rule municipal corporation By:Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Michael Dane, Interim City Manager Date: LESSEE: Above The Clouds, LLC By: Sherry L. DeMory, Date:STATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF TOM GREEN This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____ day of________________, 2012, by Michael Dane, Interim City Manager of the CITY OF SANANGELO, A Texas home rule municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public, State of TexasTHE STATE OF TEXAS §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of ,2012, by Sherry L. DeMory, as ____________________ of Above The Clouds LLC, aTexas limited liability company, on behalf of said limited liability company. Notary Public, State of Texas - 13 -
  • EXHIBIT “A”1. Indemnification. 1.1 General Indemnification. Lessee agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold City, its councilmembers, board and commission members, officials, agents, guests, invitees, consultants and employees free and harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, proceedings, suits, judgments, costs, penalties, fines, damages, losses, attorneys’ fees and expenses asserted by any person or persons, including agents or employees of Lessee or City, by reason of death or injury to persons, or loss or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of, the violation of any law or regulation or in any manner attributable to any act of commission, omission, negligence or fault of Lessee, its agents or employees, or the joint negligence of Lessee and any other entity, as a consequence of its execution or performance of this Lease or sustained in or upon the premises, or as a result of anything claimed to be done or admitted to be done by Lessee hereunder. This indemnification shall survive the term of this Lease as long as any liability could be asserted. Nothing herein shall require Lessee to indemnify, defend or hold harmless any indemnified party for the indemnified party’s own gross negligence or willful misconduct. 1.2 Prospective Application. Any and all indemnity provided for in this Lease shall survive the expiration of this Lease and the discharge of all other obligations owed by the parties to each other hereunder and shall apply prospectively not only during the term of this Lease but thereafter so long as any liability (including but not limited to liability for closure and post closure costs) could be asserted in regard to any acts or omissions of Lessee in performing under this Lease.2. Insurance. 2.1 General Conditions. The following conditions shall apply to all insurance policies obtained by Lessee for the purpose of complying with this Lease. 2.1.1 Satisfactory Companies. Coverage shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policies satisfactory to City and with insurers licensed to do business in Texas. 2.1.2 Named Insureds. All insurance policies required herein shall be drawn in the name of Lessee, with City, its councilmembers, board and commission members, officials, agents, guests, invitees, consultants and employees named as additional insureds, except on Workers’ Compensation coverage. - 14 -
  • 2.1.3 Waiver of Subrogation. Lessee shall require its insurance carrier(s), with respect to all insurance policies, to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its councilmembers, board and commission members, officials, agents, guests, invitees, consultants and employees. 2.1.4 Certificates of Insurance. At or before the time of execution of this Lease, Lessee shall furnish City’s Risk Manager with certificates of insurance as evidence that all of the policies required herein are in full force and effect and provide the required coverages and limits of insurance. All certificates of insurance shall clearly state that all applicable requirements have been satisfied. The certificates shall provide that any company issuing an insurance policy shall provide to City not less than thirty (30) days advance notice in writing of cancellation, non-renewal or material change in the policy of insurance. In addition, Lessee and insurance company shall immediately provide written notice to City’s Risk Manager upon receipt of notice of cancellation of any insurance policy, or of a decision to terminate or alter any insurance policy. Certificates of insurance and notices of cancellations, terminations or alterations shall be furnished to City’s Risk Manager at City Hall, 72 West College or P.O. Box 1751, San Angelo, Texas 76903. 2.1.5 Lessee’s Liability. The procurement of such policy of insurance shall not be construed to be a limitation upon Lessee’s liability or as a full performance on its part of the indemnification provisions of this Lease. Lessee’s obligations are, notwithstanding any policy of insurance, for the full and total amount of any damage, injury or loss caused by or attributable to its activities conducted at or upon the premises. Failure of Lessee to maintain adequate coverage shall not relieve Lessee of any contractual responsibility or obligation. 2.1.6 Sublessees’ Insurance. Lessee shall cause each Sublessee and Sub-sublessee of Lessee to purchase and maintain insurance of the types and in the amounts specified below. Lessee shall require Sublessees and Sub-sublessees to furnish copies of certificates of insurance to Lessor’s Risk Manager evidencing coverage for each Sublessee and Sub- sublessee.2.2 Types and Amounts of Insurance Required. Lessee shall obtain and continuously maintain in effect at all times during the term hereof, at - 15 -
  • Lessee’s sole expense, insurance coverages as follows with limits not lessthan those set forth below:2.2.1 Commercial General Liability. This policy shall be an occurrence-type policy, written in comprehensive form and shall protect the Lessee and additional insureds against all claims arising from bodily injury, sickness, disease or death of any person (other than the Lessee’s employees) and damage to property of the City or others arising out of the act or omission of the Lessee or its agents and employees. This policy shall also include protection against claims for the contractual liability assumed by Lessee under the paragraph of this Lease entitled “Indemnification,” including completed operations, products liability, contractual coverage, broad form property coverage, explosion, collapse, underground, premises/operations, and independent contractors (to remain in force for two years after final payment). Coverage shall not be less than: $ 500,000.00 General Aggregate $ 500,000.00 Products- Completed Operations Aggregate $ 500,000.00 Personal & Advertising Injury $ 500,000.00 Each Occurrence $ 100,000.00 Fire Damage (any one fire)2.2.2 Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability. If Lessee hires any employees, Lessee shall maintain Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability insurance, which shall protect the Lessee against all claims under applicable state workers’ compensation laws and employer’s liability. The insured shall also be protected against claims for injury, disease or death of employees which, for any reason, may not fall within the provisions of a workers’ compensation law. Coverage shall not be less than: Statutory Amount Workers’ Compensation $ 100,000.00 Employer’s Liability, Each Accident $ 100,000.00 Employer’s Liability, Disease – Each Employee $ 500,000.00 Employer’s Liability, Disease - Policy Limit The foregoing requirement will not be applicable if, and so long as, Lessee qualifies as a self-insurer under the rules and - 16 -
  • regulations of the commission or agency administering theworkers’ compensation program in Texas and furnishesevidence of such qualification to Lessor in accordance with thenotice provisions of this Lease.If Lessee uses contract labor, Lessee shall require itscontractor to maintain the above referenced coverage andfurnish copies of certificates of insurance as required herein. - 17 -
  • Exhibit-B SAN ANGELO REGIONAL AIRPORT Above The Clouds, LLC Revenue StatementDate Submitted: _______________________Report for the month ending: _________________, _________Monthly payment: Gross Receipts, excluding: vending, arcade, printed media $___________ Minus State Sales Tax ($__________) Total Gross Receipts: $___________ 5% of gross receipts $___________ Base Rent: $____300.00_Payment is either: 5% of Gross Receipts orBase Rent whichever is greater: $___________TOTAL MONTHLY PAYMENT: $____________THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE STATEMENTS AND REVENUES ARE TRUE ANDCORRECT._____________________________________NOTE:In compliance with the term of your lease with the City of San Angelo, this statement alongwith the payment due, must be submitted to the San Angelo Regional Airport Administrationoffice no later than the 1st day following the month-end being reported. - 18 -
  • MEMORANDUMDate: March 9, 2012To: Mayor and CouncilmembersFrom: Luis Elguezabal, A.A.E., Airport DirectorSubject: Consideration for March 20, 2012 meetingContact: Luis Elguezabal, A.A.E., Airport, extension-1010Caption: CONSENT AGENDA: CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE AMOUNT OF $350,000 PER YEAR FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF TWO HANGARS AT SAN ANGELO REGIONAL AIRPORT.History: The City currently leases to the Government two hangars, known as the AMCOM Hangars. The Government would like to enter into a new agreement for the same property.Summary: The City exclusively leases to the Government approximately 114,869 square feet of shop, office, storage, and hangar space located in two buildings: • A one story structure containing approximately 69,896 square feet of space plus the 2.222 acre tract on which it is located at 8154 Hangar Road. • A hangar containing approximately 42,000 square feet of open hangar area, office area on the ground floor, classroom/office/storage on the second level, and a 3,300 square foot office/ shop in a detached building and parking lot (all within the fenced area) on approximately a 4.274 acre tract. • A hardstand employee parking (50 vehicles) collocated with Hangar 8154. The Government will use the property for the operation, maintenance and repair of military aircraft, and related purposes. The first term of the lease will end September 4, 2012. The Government shall have the right to renew this lease from year to year, provided that this lease shall in no event extend beyond September 4, 2016.Financial Impact: The Lease Agreement will generate revenue funds of $29,166.67 monthly or $350,000 annually for the City of San Angelo.Related Vision Item: NoneOther Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends approval.Attachments: Airport Hangar Facilities Lease AgreementPresentation: NonePublication: NoneReviewed by Director: Luis Elguezabal, A.A.E., Airport, 03-09-12
  • LEASE NO. DACA63-5-11-0329 Succeeds: DACA63-5-06-0217 TAX ID NO.: 75-6000659 TITLE 10: USC 2661 AIRPORT HANGAR FACILITIES LEASE For PRIVATELY OWNED PROPERTY LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO REGIONAL AIRPORT/MATHIS FIELD AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA1. This LEASE, made and entered into this ______ day of ____________ in the year 2012 By: THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, SAN ANGELO REGIONAL AIRPORT/MATHIS FIELD address: PO BOX 1751, SAN ANGELO, TEXAS 76902-1751and whose interest in the property is that of the OWNER, hereinafter called the LESSOR, and the UNITEDSTATES OF AMERICA, hereinafter called the GOVERNMENT, in consideration for RENT to be paid by theGovernment to the lessor, the parties promise and agree as follows:2. PROPERTY: The Lessor leases to the Government the following described property: Exclusive use ofapproximately 114,869 square feet of shop, office, storage, and hangar space located in two buildings: a. A one story structure containing approximately 69,896 square feet of space known as the Rickenbacker hangarplus the 2.222 acre tract on which it is located at San Angelo Regional Airport/Mathis Field bearing the municipaladdress of 8154 Hangar Road, City of San Angelo, County of Tom Green, Texas 76904 and, b. The aircraft hangar known as the Quimby Hangar containing approximately 42,000 square feet of open hangararea, office area on the ground floor, classroom/office/storage on the second level, and a 3,300 square foot office/shop in a detached building and parking lot (all within the fenced area) on approximately a 4.274 acre tract which islocated at the San Angelo Regional Airport/Mathis Field, bearing the municipal address of 8534 and 8502 HangarRoad, respectively, City of San Angelo, County of Tom Green, Texas 76904 and, c. Hardstand employee parking (50 vehicles) collocated with Hangar 8154. Parking is located outside the FAAairfield fence line, but within easy walking distance for employees working in Hangar 8154, more particularlydescribed in the Exhibits and Legal Descriptions, attached hereto and made a part hereof, to be used for theoperation, maintenance and repair of military aircraft, and related purposes. The Government will comply with allapplicable Federal and State laws governing storage, release and disposal of hazardous substances. (Fuel area is notincluded). Page 1 of 7______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ Lease No. DACA63-5-11-0329 114,869 SF Hangar/Office Space, San Angelo Regional Airport/Mathis Field, San Angelo, TX INITIALS: _________ & ___________ Lessor Government
  • LEASE NO. DACA63-5-11-0329 Succeeds: DACA63-5-06-02173. LEASE TERM: a. The Government shall have the right to have and to hold the said premises, or any portion thereof, for theperiod beginning 5 September 2011 through 4 September 2012. The Government shall have the right to renewthis lease from year to year or for a lesser period of time, under the same terms, conditions, and considerationprovided herein. The Government shall provide written notice to the Lessor of the Government’s intent to renewthis lease prior to the expiration date of the current term, provided further that the renewal of the lease is subject toadequate appropriations being made available from year to year for the payment of rentals, and provides further,that this lease shall in no event extend beyond 4 September 2016. If the Government does not provide writtennotice to the Lessor of the Government’s intent to renew this lease prior to the expiration date of the current leaseterm, this lease will expire, with no further notice being required from Government, at the end of the current leaseterm. b. If after the expiration date the Government shall retain possession of the premises, the lease shall continue infull force and effect on a day-to-day basis not to exceed ninety (90) days and rental shall be paid on a pro-rata basisas the rate provided herein.4. RENTAL: The Government shall pay the Owner rent at the following rate: THREE HUNDRED FIFTYTHOUSAND 00/100 DOLLARS ($350,000.00) per annum at the rate of TWENTY NINE THOUSAND ONEHUNDRED SIXTY SIX AND 67/100 DOLLARS ($29,166.67) per month in arrears. Rent for a lesser periodshall be prorated. Payment of rent shall be made by electronic funds transfer and shall be payable to: SANANGELO REGIONAL AIRPORT/MATHIS FIELD, Address, 8618 TERMINAL CIRCLE, SAN ANGELO,TEXAS 76904, by: US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, USACE FINANCE CENTER, ATTN: CEFC-AO,5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE, MILLINGTON, TN 38054-5005. See paragraph 16d below for operating expensesthat are included in the rental payment.5. OWNERSHIP: The Lessor warrants that he is the rightful and legal owner of the property and has the legalright to enter into this lease. If the title of the Lessor shall fail, or it be discovered that the Lessor did not haveauthority to lease to the property, the lease shall terminate. The Lessor, the Lessor’s heirs, executors, administrators,successors, or assigns agree to indemnify the Government by reason of such failure and to refund all rentals paid.6. EXCLUSIVE USE: The Lessor shall not interfere with or restrict the Government, or its representatives in theuse and enjoyment of the leased property, nor shall the Lessor erect any fence, wall, partition or any constructionupon the leased, property except as otherwise agreed to in writing by the Government. Provided that theGovernment’s use and enjoyment of the leased property is consistent with all federal, state and local laws regardingthe San Angelo Regional Airport/Mathis Field.7. TERMINATION: a. The Government may terminate this lease at any time in whole or in part, by giving at least thirty (30) daysnotice in writing to the Lessor and no rental shall be due for payment after the effective date of termination. Saidnotice shall be the day after the date of mailing, or hand delivery. The monthly rental shall be adjusted in proportionwith the reduction of space on a Partial Termination and shall be calculated based upon a pro rata unit of measurefor the remaining lease area premises. b. Termination in whole or in part shall be effective upon written notice; however, the parties may enter into asupplemental agreement to resolve certain issues arising from the tenancy and its termination, in whole or in part. c. The Lessor has no termination rights.8. SERVICES AND UTILITIES: The Lessor shall furnish to the Government, as part of the rental consideration,the following: Page 2 of 7______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ Lease No. DACA63-5-11-0329 114,869 SF Hangar/Office Space, San Angelo Regional Airport/Mathis Field, San Angelo, TX INITIALS: _________ & ___________ Lessor Government
  • LEASE NO. DACA63-5-11-0329 Succeeds: DACA63-5-06-0217 a. GENERAL: Lessor agrees to provide ingress and egress. Lessor shall warrant that water, sewer, electricity,telephone, and natural gas services are available to the building. The Lessor shall provide separate meters forutilities to be paid by the Government. These meters will measure the Government’s use only. b. COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE: Lessor agrees to provide common area maintenance, which includes,but is not limited to, the maintenance of the parking lot, landscaping, snow removal, and maintenance of othercommon areas and fixtures. c. HVAC SYSTEM: Lessor agrees to maintain and repair heating, ventilation, and air condition (HVAC)system, which includes the replacement of filters a minimum of every three (3) months. The system shall be capableof maintaining a minimum temperature of 20º C (680 F) during the heating season and a maximum temperature of26º C (780 F) during the cooling season. HVAC must be appropriately balanced to ensure minimum deviation oftemperature throughout the leased property regardless of outside temperature during the hours of operation specifiedin the lease. d. LIGHTS: Lessor agrees to provide and replace light bulbs and/or fluorescent tubes, starters, and ballasts asrequired. e. PEST CONTROL: It is understood and agreed that the Lessor will be responsible to provide pest controlmeasures and pesticides, which conform to the Lessor’s regulations, to keep the property free from pests and in atenantable condition. It is intended that the Government will maintain the leased property in a clean and sanitarycondition in conformance with normal standards of good housekeeping, and that the Lessor will provide andmaintain the leased property in pest-free condition. f. Payment to third parties for real estate taxes and insurance premiums with respect to the leased premises. g. PARKING: Approximately 23,000 square feet of level, well drained, hard-surface space, located west of theleased premises and Hangar Road, to be utilized for employee parking which includes and additional 50 vehicleparking spaces.9. GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITIES: a. The Government will be responsible for janitorial services and all utility charges incurred on a monthly basis.The Lessor shall provide separate meters for utilities to be paid by the Government. These meters will measureGovernment usage only. b. The Government agrees to comply fully with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.10. ALTERATIONS/RESTORATION/RELEASE OF LIABILITY: The Government shall have the right,during the existence of this lease, to make alterations, attach fixtures, and erect additions, structures, or signs, in orupon the property hereby leased, which fixtures, additions, or structures, so placed in, upon or attached to the saidproperty shall be and remain the property of the Government and may be removed or left in place at the option ofthe Government. The Government shall surrender possession of the property upon the expiration or termination ofthis lease. The Lessor hereby releases and forever discharges the Government, its officers, employees and/orcontractors from any and all liability, claims or demands for site restoration of the leased premises.11. DAMAGES: The Government shall not be responsible for combat or war related damages to the leasepremises; the Government shall be liable only for damage resulting from negligence or misconduct of Governmentpersonnel. The Government shall not be liable for any loss, destruction or damages to the premises beyond thecontrol and without the fault of negligence of the Government, including, but not restricted to, acts of nature, fire,lightning, floods, or severe weather. The parties agree that any settlement of damages by the Government, if any,shall be done at termination of the lease. Page 3 of 7______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ Lease No. DACA63-5-11-0329 114,869 SF Hangar/Office Space, San Angelo Regional Airport/Mathis Field, San Angelo, TX INITIALS: _________ & ___________ Lessor Government
  • LEASE NO. DACA63-5-11-0329 Succeeds: DACA63-5-06-021712. PROPERTY INVENTORY: As of the commencement date of this lease, a joint inventory and conditionreport of all personal property of the Lessor included in this lease, and also a joint physical survey and inspectionreport of the demised property shall be made, said reports to reflect the then present condition, and to be signed onbehalf of the parties hereto.13. EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES: The Lessor warrants the mechanical equipment and utilities to be in goodserviceable and operating condition. In particular, the Lessor warrants that the heating system of the leased propertyis adequate and sufficient to maintain a 20 degree Celsius (680 F) temperature. If the heating, domestic hot water,electric, water, or gas systems prove to be inadequate, the Lessor agrees to correct the deficiencies at his expense.Furthermore, the Lessor warrants the mechanical equipment, utilities, and their respective systems comply withpresent safety norms. Should these norms be changed or modified, the Lessor will, at his expense, do whatever isnecessary to comply with the new norms.14. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS: a. The Lessor shall, at all times, maintain the leased property in good repair and tenantable condition. In theevent the Lessor shall be absent or otherwise unavailable, he shall provide the Government the name, address, andtelephone number of a designated representative who will assume full responsibility for maintenance and repairs. b. The Lessor shall be responsible to perform all maintenance and repairs which shall be performed in a timelymanner. Scheduling of all maintenance and repairs shall be coordinated with the designated occupant representativeof the Government; whose name and/or position title, as well as telephone and mailing address information is foundat Paragraph 17 of this lease. c. The Government occupant representative will notify the Lessor of any emergency and request the Lessor toperform the necessary work. All emergency maintenance and repairs performed by the Lessor will be completedwithin forty-eight (48) hours from the time of notification. Emergency maintenance and repairs include but are notlimited to: (1) Failure of heating system to maintain specified temperature. (2) Failure of hot water system. (3) Inadequate or no water pressure. (4) Leaking water pipes. (5) Blocked or leaking drains. (6) Electrical failure. (7) Sewerage system malfunctions. d. In the event the Lessor shall fail to perform emergency maintenance and repairs within forty-eight (48) hoursor to perform non-emergency maintenance and repairs within five (5) days from the date notice is given by theGovernment, the Government may immediately perform or have performed such maintenance and repairs anddeduct all costs thereof from the rental and other charges due or to become due under the terms of this lease.15. TAXES: The City of San Angelo is tax exempt and has no tax liability on the property. The Lessor acceptsfull and sole responsibility for other charges of a public nature which may arise in connection with this lease orwhich may be assessed against the property. This includes registration of the lease and payment of related charges.16. ANNUAL COST ADJUSTMENT FOR MAINTENANCE, INSURANCE and TAXES: In addition to therent stated, the Government shall, at the end of any calendar year of the lease, pay to the Lessor in a lump sum bysupplemental agreement the Government’s proportionate share of any increase in the costs for utilities, services(janitorial and pest control), maintenance (HVAC and common area), hazard and liability insurance and real estateproperty taxes, over the amount of such costs paid as part of the monthly rental; provided that the lessor is furnishing Page 4 of 7______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ Lease No. DACA63-5-11-0329 114,869 SF Hangar/Office Space, San Angelo Regional Airport/Mathis Field, San Angelo, TX INITIALS: _________ & ___________ Lessor Government
  • LEASE NO. DACA63-5-11-0329 Succeeds: DACA63-5-06-0217such service under this lease, and provided that the increase shall be not less than $150.00. Such request shall bein writing and received by the Government no later than 90 days from the end of the calendar year for whichpayment is requested. a. No payment will be made until the Lessor has furnished to the Government copies of proof of payment(invoices/receipts/canceled checks) or, at the Government’s option, a certified statement for each calendar year tosupport such increased costs (exclusive of any forfeited discount, penalties, and interest assessed, levied, andcharged against the leased premises), for the purpose of a comparison of the costs for the year for which payment isrequested with the costs specified below. In order to support a payment for increased costs, documentation relatingto each item specified above must be submitted, not just the item for which an increase is claimed. b. The Government reserves the right to request documentation for all preceding calendar years of the lease. If itis determined that for any calendar year a decrease was experienced, the Government shall have the right to recoverany overpayment for that calendar year from the Lessor by lump sum payment or by adjusting the monthly rentalpayment. Consideration for any period of the lease that is less than the full 12-month calendar year will be prorated. c. In no event shall the costs of the aforementioned items exceed fair market rental value of the leased space. TheGovernments proportionate share is 100%, which represents the hangars, shops and office space occupied by theGovernment (114,869 square feet). d. The annual rent of $350,000.00, as stated in lease provision 4 above, includes the following: Taxes $0.00 (Tax exempt, see paragraph 15) Maintenance (interior, exterior & HVAC): $28,717.25 (114,869 * $0.25 per sq ft) Insurance: $17,230.25 (114,869 * $0.15 per sq ft) TOTAL: $45,947.50 $0.40 per sq ft17. NOTICE: Any notice under the terms of this lease shall be in writing signed by a duly authorizedrepresentative of the party giving such notice, and if given by the Government shall be addressed to the Lessor at: Airport Director City of San Angelo San Angelo Regional Airport/Mathis Field 8618 Terminal Circle, Suite 101 San Angelo, Texas 76904 Office Telephone: 325.659.6409 (Extension 3)and if given by the Lessor shall be addressed to the Government (reference Lease No. DACA63-5-11-0329 at: US Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District ATTN: CESWF-RE-A PO Box 17300 Fort Worth, Texas 76102-0300or if by hand delivery to: US Army Corps of Engineers Chief, Acquisition Branch Real Estate Division 819 Taylor Street, Room 2B03 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Telephone No: 817.886.1215 Page 5 of 7______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ Lease No. DACA63-5-11-0329 114,869 SF Hangar/Office Space, San Angelo Regional Airport/Mathis Field, San Angelo, TX INITIALS: _________ & ___________ Lessor Government
  • LEASE NO. DACA63-5-11-0329 Succeeds: DACA63-5-06-0217Further, the Lessor shall contact the designated occupant representative of the Government regarding maintenanceand repairs, as addressed in Paragraph 15b of this lease, by telephone and mail or hand delivery at: Aviation Field Maintenance Activity Fort Hood, Facilities Manager 1202 Rio Blvd Killeen, Texas 76543 Telephone No: 254.953.285418. CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP: In the event of change of ownership of the leased premises, the Lessor agreesto notify the Government as soon as possible of the impending change of ownership and further agrees to furnish theGovernment a copy of the recorded deed, recorded assignment, or other proof of ownership, as may be requested bythe Government, within thirty (30) days of the effective date of said change of ownership. Failure by the Lessor toprovide requested documents within thirty (30) days may result in the delay of withholding of rental or otherpayments due under this lease until such time that ownership is established to the Government’s satisfaction.19. LESSOR’S SUCCESSORS: The terms and provisions of this lease and the conditions shall bind the Lessor,and the Lessor’s heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns.20. MINERALS: It is understood and agreed that this lease is made subject and subordinate to the terms of anyoil, gas, and other mineral lease and right-of-way easements of any nature which may have been executed prior tothis lease.21. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES: The Lessor warrants that no person or selling agency hasbeen employed or retained to solicit or secure this lease upon an agreement or understanding for a commission,percentage, brokerage, or a contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercial orselling agencies maintained by the Lessor for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of thiswarranty the Government shall have the right to annul this lease without liability or in its discretion to deduct fromthe lease price or consideration the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee.22. OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT: No Member of or Delegate to Congress or Resident Commissioner shallbe admitted to any share or part of this lease or to any benefit that may arise therefrom, but this provision shall notbe construed to extend to this lease if made with a corporation for its general benefit.23. GRATUITIES: a. The Government may, by written notice to the Lessor, terminate the right of the Lessor to proceed under thislease if it is found, after notice and hearing, by the Secretary of the Army or his duly authorized representative, thatgratuities (in the form of entertainment, gifts, or otherwise) were offered or given by the Lessor, or any agent orrepresentative of the Lessor, to any officer, or employee of the Government with a view toward securing a lease orsecuring favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending, or the making of any determinations withrespect to the performing, of such lease; provided, that the existence of facts upon which the Secretary of the Armyor his duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competentcourt. b. In the event this lease is terminated as provided in paragraph “a” hereof, the Government shall be entitled (i)to pursue the same remedies against the Lessor as it could pursue in the event of a breach of the lease by the Lessor,and (ii) as a penalty in addition to any other damages to which it may be entitled by law, to exemplary damages inan amount (as determined by the Secretary of the Army or his duly authorized representative) which shall be not lessthan three nor more than ten times the costs incurred by the Lessor in providing any such gratuities to an such officeror employee. Page 6 of 7______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ Lease No. DACA63-5-11-0329 114,869 SF Hangar/Office Space, San Angelo Regional Airport/Mathis Field, San Angelo, TX INITIALS: _________ & ___________ Lessor Government
  • LEASE NO. DACA63-5-11-0329 Succeeds: DACA63-5-06-0217 c. The rights and remedies of the Government provided in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this lease.24. EXAMINATION OF RECORDS: The Lessor agrees that any duly authorized representatives shall have theright until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment of the agreed rental, have access to and the right toexamine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of the Lessor involving transactions related tothis lease.25. MODIFICATION: No Change or modification of this lease shall be effective unless it is in writing and signedby both parties to this lease.26. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: The following are attached and made a part hereto: a. General Clauses 1-48 (GSA Form 3517B) b. Exhibit “A”, Attachment J, Lease Restrictions c. Exhibit “B”, Field Notes and Legal Description (Rickenbacker Hangar) d. Exhibit “C”, Field Notes and Legal Description (Quimby Hangar)IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have subscribed their names as of the date first above written.LESSOR: The City of San Angelo, TexasBY: _________________________________________________ ______________________________ MICHAEL DANE DATE Interim City Manager, City of San AngeloATTEST: ___________________________________________ ALICIA RAMIREZ City Clerk, City of San AngeloTHE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:BY: _______________________________________ _______________________________ HYLA J. HEAD DATE Chief, Real Estate Division Page 7 of 7______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ Lease No. DACA63-5-11-0329 114,869 SF Hangar/Office Space, San Angelo Regional Airport/Mathis Field, San Angelo, TX INITIALS: _________ & ___________ Lessor Government
  • City of San Angelo Office of the City ClerkMemoDate: March 12, 2012To: Mayor and CouncilmembersFrom: Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkSubject: Agenda Item for March 20, 2012 Council MeetingContact: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk, 657-4405Caption: Consent Item Consideration of adopting a Resolution appointing election officials for the May 12, 2012 General ElectionSummary: The Resolution appointing election officials, judges and alternates for the General Election is a routine action required by the Election Code. In the majority of the polling places, both the judges and alternates have previously served for City elections. In all polling places, either the judge or alternate has experience in serving for elections. In addition, State Law requires the presiding judge of an election precinct to make reasonable efforts to appoint a sufficient number of election clerks who are fluent in both English and Spanish to serve the needs of the Spanish-speaking voters of the precinct, if five percent (5%) or more of the inhabitants are persons of Spanish origin or descent. Most precincts will include two (2) election clerks. In accordance with the Election Services Contract with the Tom Green County Elections Administrator previously approved by the Council, the list of judges and alternates is provided by the Elections Administrator and is responsible for ensuring reasonable efforts to serve Spanish- speaking voters.Financial Impact: The expense of the Election is shared on a pro rata basis with the Wall and Veribest Independent School Districts. Based on the estimated total cost for a city-wide election at $40,000.00 to $60,000.00, combining polling locations from 23 to 8, and unknown factors due to SB100, the estimated cost for the City is $30,000.00 to $45,000.00.Other Information/Recommendation: On the final two days of early voting by personal appearance, the Election Administrator’s office and branch location hours will be designated from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m., beginning on May 7 and ending May 8, 2012. Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. The Resolution designating the polling locations and Contract for joint election services was authorized in December 6, 2011.Attachments: Resolution appointing Election Judges
  • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES WITHIN THE ELECTION PRECINCTS WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS FOR ELECTIONS ORDERED; PROVIDING FOR PRE-CLEARANCE AND ALL OTHER NECESSARY ACTIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Texas Election Code Section 43.004 authorizes the City Council todesignate the location of the polling places for each of its election precincts; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas (the “City Council”) hasinvestigated and determined that it will be advantageous and beneficial to the City of SanAngelo, Texas ("City") and its inhabitants to designate election day polling places within theelection precincts within San Angelo for all elections ordered by the City Council; and WHEREAS, by this Resolution, it is the intention of the City Council to designate anelection day polling place within each election precinct; and WHEREAS, changes in precincts constitute a change from prior practices requiringpreclearance under the Federal Voting Rights Act. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO, TEXAS: SECTION 1: FINDINGS INCORPORATED. The findings set forth above areincorporated into the body of this Resolution as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: DESIGNATION OF ELECTION DAY AND SUBSEQUENT ELECTION DAYPOLLING PLACES: The polling places within each election precinct within the City, as set forthin Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. SECTION 3: SUBMISSIONS TO THE UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: TheCity Clerk of the City of San Angelo, or her authorized agent, shall make such submissions asare necessary to the United State Justice Department to seek pre-clearance approval. SECTION 4: NECESSARY ACTIONS: The Mayor and the City Clerk, in consultationwith the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessaryto comply with the provisions of the Code, the Texas Election Code and any other state orfederal law in carrying out and designating polling placing, whether or not expressly authorizedherein and all actions previously taken are hereby ratified.
  • SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall become effective immediatelyupon its passage.APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 6th day of December, 2011. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ___________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:_______________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
  • Exhibit “A” POLLING PLACES FOR MAY 12, 2012 GENERAL ELECTION AND SUBSEQUENT UNIFORM ELECTION DATE AND RELATED EARLY VOTING DATESEARLY VOTING BRANCH LOCATIONS OPEN FROM APRIL 30, 2011 TO MAY 4, 2011FROM 8:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M. & MAY 7, 2011 TO MAY 8, 2011 FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 7:00P.M. Main Tom Green County Election Office 113 W. Beauregard, 2nd Floor EV1 River Place Senior Apartments 501 S. Irene EV2 Disability Connections 3184 Executive Drive EV3 Assembly of God Church 1442 Edmund Blvd. EV4 Plaza del Sol Apartments 4359 Oak Grove BlvdELECTION DAY POLLING LOCATIONS OPEN FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 7:00 P.M.:1. Precincts 103, 106, 114, 124, 126, 131, 137, 138, 144, 145, 146, 147, 155, 156, 157 will vote at either one of the following locations on Election Day: Precincts Location Address 144 Belmore Baptist Church 1214 S. Bell St. 146 Baptist Memorial Hospital 902 North Main2. Precincts 209, 215, 220, 225, 230, 241, 249, 228, 230, 240, 241, 243, 253, 254 157 will vote at either one of the following locations on Election Day: Precincts Location Address 230 Southgate Church of Christ 528 Country Club Rd. 241 Sierra Vista United Methodist Church 4522 College Hills Boulevard3. Precincts 304, 305, 306, 307, 319, 327, 338, 348, 350, 351, 352 will vote at either one of the following locations on Election Day: Precincts Location Address 304 Wells Fargo Pavilion 40 E 43rd Street 319 Heights Southern Baptist Church 4512 Sherwood Way4. Precincts 401, 402, 421, 429, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 442, 459 will vote at either one of the following locations on Election Day: Precincts Location Address 421 Plaza Del Sol Apartments 4359 Oak Grove Blvd. 436 MHMR 1501 W. Beauregard
  • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, APPOINTING ELECTION OFFICIALS, JUDGES, AND ALTERNATE JUDGES FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MAY 12, 2012; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo adopted Ordinance #2012-02-015 on February 7, 2012 callingfor the General Election on May 12, 2012; and WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo adopted Resolution #2011-12-132R on December 6, 2011designating polling places within the election precincts within the City of San Angelo, Texas for electionsordered; and WHEREAS, the Texas Election Code Section 32.005 authorizes the City Council to appointelection officers and judges for the designated polling places, within the election precincts within theCity of San Angelo, Texas for elections ordered by the City; and WHEREAS, by this Resolution, it is the intention of the City Council to appoint election officialsand judges to each early voting and election day polling place within the designated election precinct;and WHEREAS, the Election Services Contract with the Tom Green County Elections Administratorprovides that the Administrator arrange for the use of the polling places and furnish a list of judges andalternates for each polling place; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: SECTION 1: FINDINGS INCORPORATED. The findings set forth above are incorporated into thebody of this Resolution as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: DESIGNATION OF ELECTION JUDGES AND ALTERNATES FOR THE CITY’S ELECTIONPRECINCTS FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION TO HELD ON MAY 12, 2012: The election judges and alternatesassigned to the designated election precincts within the City, as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached heretoand incorporated herein for all purposes. SECTION 3: FURTHER DESIGNATION: The City further authorizes the City Clerk to appointsubstitute election judges in the event the individuals appointed herein are unable to fulfill their duties. SECTION 4: NECESSARY ACTIONS: The Mayor and the City Clerk, in consultation with the CityAttorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessary to comply with theprovisions of the Code, the Texas Election Code and any other state or federal law in carrying out and
  • designating polling placing, whether or not expressly authorized herein and all actions previously takenare hereby ratified. SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon itspassage.APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 20th day of March, 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS Alvin New, MayorATTEST:Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Form: Approved As to Content:Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
  • Exhibit “A” DESIGNATION OF ELECTION OFFICIALS, JUDGES, AND ALTERNATE JUDGES FOR MAY 12, 2012 GENERAL ELECTIONELECTION DAY POLLING LOCATIONS OPEN FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 7:00 P.M.1. Precincts 106, 107, 114, 124, 137, 144, 146, will vote at either one of the following locations on Election Day: Precincts Location Address 144 Belmore Baptist Church 1214 S. Bell St. Election Judge: Mary Blakeley Alternate Judge: Nelda Englert 146 Baptist Memorial Hospital 902 North Main Election Judge: Jim Ryan Alternate Judge: Margaret Fernandez2. Precincts 215, 230, 241, 228, and 243 will vote at either one of the following locations on Election Day: Precincts Location Address 230 Southgate Church of Christ 528 Country Club Rd. Election Judge: Sid Clemmer Alternate Judge: Carol Cahill 241 Sierra Vista United Methodist Church 4522 College Hills Blvd. Election Judge: Charles Hafer Alternate Judge: Sue Bramhall3. Precincts 304, 305, 306, 319, 327, 348, and 351 will vote at either one of the following locations on Election Day: Precincts Location Address 304 Lakeview Bible Church 4825 Grape Creek Rd Election Judge: Gloria Mata Alternate Judge: Aurora Rodriguez 319 Heights Southern Baptist Church 4512 Sherwood Way Election Judge: Sandra Smith Alternate Judge: Charlene Corfield4. Precincts 401, 402, 420, 421, 434, 435, and 436 will vote at either one of the following locations on Election Day: Precincts Location Address 421 Plaza Del Sol Apartments 4359 Oak Grove Blvd. Election Judge: Abbie Willis Alternate Judge: Mitch Krasny 436 MHMR 1501 W. Beauregard Election Judge: Patricia Affleck Alternate Judge: Jim Jones
  • Early Voting by personal appearance and mail, 113 W. BeauregardVona McKerley, Early Voting ClerkAlicia Ramirez, Deputy Early Voting ClerkRudy Olivas, Deputy Early Voting ClerkVanessa Simon, Deputy Early Voting ClerkEarly Voting Ballot Board, 113 W. BeauregardKatherine Osborne, ChairpersonLenda Campbell, ClerkConnie Robles, ClerkRita Specht, ClerkCentral Counting Station and Manual Count, 113 W. BeauregardAlicia Ramirez, Presiding JudgeVona McKerley, ManagerRudy Olivas, Technical SupervisorVACANT, TabulatorVanessa Simon, ReportsVACANT, ClerkTom Green County Sherriff, SecurityVACANT, DockPrecinct Records and Voted Ballots Storage, 113 W. BeauregardVona McKerley, Agent to General CustodianAlicia Ramirez, General Custodian of Special Election Records
  • City of San AngeloMemo Meeting Date: March 6, 2012 To: City Council members From: Jeff Hintz, Planner Subject: Z 12-02 Billy Huffman, A request for approval of a zone change from Ranch and Estate (R&E) to Office Warehouse (OW) on the following property: Location: 1710 Cox Lane, approximately 700 feet west from the intersection of Cox Lane and Ben Ficklin Road, specifically occupying the B & R Subdivision, Section 2, Tract 2 in south central San Angelo. Purpose: Approval of this request will change the zoning from Ranch and Estate (R&E) to Office Warehouse (OW) Contacts: Billy Huffman 325-947-3690 Jeff Hintz, Planner 325-657-4210 Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of the Planning Commission’s recommendation modifying a request for a zone change from Ranch & Estate (R&E) to Heavy Commercial (CH), alternatively recommending a zone change from Ranch & Estate (R&E) to Office Warehouse (OW) with an introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo Z 12-02: Billy Huffman AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1710 Cox Lane, approximately 700 feet west from the intersection of Cox Lane and Ben Ficklin Road, specifically occupying the B & R Subdivision, Section 2, Tract 2 in south central San Angelo, changing the zoning
  • classification from Ranch & Estate (R&E) to Office Warehouse (OW) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYSummary: The City Council may:(1) approve the proposed zone change;(2) modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be more appropriate; or(3) deny the proposed zone changeRecommendation: Planning staff recommends modifying the proposed zonechange to Office Warehouse (OW) for reasons outlined within this report.On February 20, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended modification of theoriginal request of Heavy Commercial (CH) to Office Warehouse (OW) by a vote of 6-0.History and Background:General Information Existing Zoning: Ranch & Estate (R&E) Existing Land Use: Vacant property Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: R&E Vacant West: R&E/RS-1 Vacant South: OW Construction contractors East: CH Vacant Thoroughfares/Streets: Cox Lane is defined as a “minor collector.” Minor collector streets are designed to connect arterial streets to local streets and access land. Minor collector streets should have 60 feet of right-of-way dedicated and at least 50 feet of paving width. Currently, Cox Lane has about 60 feet of right-of-way; however, the street only has 24 feet of paving, less than half of what would ordinarily be required by the subdivision ordinance
  • in order to serve the amounts of traffic expected for a collector street. When the plat for Section 1 of the B & R Subdivision was approved in September of 2003, a complete variance from paving the adjoining street (Cox Lane) was given. This portion of property for which the variance was obtained is directly to the south of the subject property. Since variances run with the property, city staff has serious doubts as to whether or not this portion of the street will ever be fully improved to the standards outlined within the subdivision ordinance Chapter 10 Section III, that have been outlined above. Zoning History: SU 02-04 allowed for self-service storage; however when no permits were obtained within one year of approval, the SU expired. Applicable Regulations: The intent of R&E is to provide low-density rural development of detached single-family residences on lots greater than an acre. An OW district intends to provide for activities with limited truck traffic and requires complete opaque screening of outside storage. This development opportunity allows for integration of offices and warehouse space with lower-intensity trade activities. Development Standards: A privacy fence is required whenever a commercial zoning designation abuts a residential district or use. This privacy fence is required in OW zones so that any outdoor storage is completely screened from public view. Vision Plan Map: Commercial Related Comp Plan Excerpts: “Commercial properties tend to be organized in a single use, isolated pattern of development. This form generates little synergy between businesses and land uses and often results in incompatibility.”Special Information Traffic Concerns: A CH zoning designation would have the potential to create a hazardous situation in the area. Cox lane is quite narrow throughout the entire length that it runs. A street that is 24 feet wide should not be carrying the types of heavier traffic counts that CH zoning could provide for. This street is not
  • appropriate for heavy traffic counts in its current state. Office and warehouse types of businesses generally have lower traffic counts and sales are limited to wholesale trade. Industrial sales and service, contractors, and office uses generate significantly less traffic than a retail establishment or restaurant does for example. Parking Requirements: Offices require one space for every 300 square feet, while warehouses require one space for every four employees. Parking Provided: none Related Specific Use Standards: N/A Density: Low-density development Notification Required: YesOriginal Notification was for Office Warehouse (OW) zoning and the following is asummary of what was received by staff. Notifications Sent: 8 Responses in Favor: 1 Responses in Opposition: 0Applicant wished to change his request to Heavy Commercial (CH) zoning and thefollowing is a summary of what was received by staff. Notifications Sent: 8 Responses in Favor: 1 Responses in Opposition: 1Analysis:In order to approve this Zone Change request, the City Council members are first requiredto consider the following criteria:1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.
  • 2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment.5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.Staff believes that OW zoning is compatible with the surrounding area and wouldprovide a nice extension of the current OW zone to the south of the property. Thesurrounding area is generally comprised of businesses in the construction, industrialservice, and wholesale supply trade. OW zoning will allow for all of these activitieswithout adding to the strip of singular commercial development in the area that is reallyquite expansive, something that the comprehensive plan does not support.A Heavy Commercial (CH) zone could drastically impact the development to the west ofthe subject property. While there is no residential development in the area presently, thefuture vision for that area does call for neighborhood, and the property is currentlyzoned for Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and Ranch and Estate (R&E). Thecombination of the intense uses allowed for within CH zoning and the under-improvedstreet network on Cox Lane has serious implications for any type of future developmentwithin this area that is called for as “neighborhood”. An OW zone would mitigate theseeffects and would have a much smaller impact when compared to the CH zoning. OWzones generally have much less traffic and are a much more suitable buffer betweenneighborhoods and more intense commercial and industrial uses that are seen alongthe South Bryant corridor. Of all the commercial types of zoning districts in the cityavailable for use and compliance with the “commercial” designation of theComprehensive Plan, for this instance and location, OW appears most appropriate.Any other type of commercial designation will include retail usage and thus generatelarger amounts of traffic, a major concern as already iterated.Tract 1 of Section 2 in the B & R subdivision would be left zoned as Ranch and Estateand is not under the bounds of this zone change proceeding. However, staff believes
  • that if the subject property were zoned to CH, this tract would be left as a highlyundesirable piece of residential property and that could have substantial effects on thedevelopment of this area. The remainder of property would be surrounded by an ML/CHtract, (a zoning designation that is no longer on the books as zoning district which onecan request today) and two CH properties. This residential piece of property would beaffected greatly by the intense commercial and industrial development in the area.Office Warehouse zoning is a much better fit for the surrounding area and will provide abetter buffer for the residential properties that develop in the future.This area located at the southeastern portion of the city is part of a high-intensity usecommercial corridor that stretches along South Bryant Boulevard from San JacintoStreet to Ben Ficklin road, a distance of over one mile in length and covering an area ofroughly 235 acres. Large strips, swaths and corridors of commercial development arespecifically to be avoided in accordance with the public outreach section of thecomprehensive plan. Under goal three of the neighborhood portion of thecomprehensive plan, the intent is to improve the relationship between adjacentcommercial and residential land uses. The action steps of this goal are broadly definedby the promotion of better transition between nearby commercial and residential use ofland and buildings by requiring buffers and through the elimination of uncomplimentaryand incompatible zoning classifications. Staff strongly believes that an OfficeWarehouse zone falls most in line for any commercial designation with these goalsoutlined within the comprehensive plan and will help to protect the future developmentof the area identified as neighborhood in the vision plan.Goal one of the commercial chapter of the Comprehensive Plan calls for theestablishment of transition areas and nearby neighborhoods. The intent of this goal is toimprove the relationship and connectivity between neighborhoods (both present andfuture) and commercial areas. The Comprehensive Plan also states that commercialareas are also designed to be on a major street network for the convenience of accessand visibility a major street network offers; these sites also tend to be regional draws forcustomers, something else that staff has considered in their analysis of the request. CoxLane is defined as a minor collector street; it is certainly not designed to and is not atthis time constructed to a capacity that will allow an intensive commercial use to be safefor the surrounding areas.Staff feels that under the given circumstances, OW zoning is much more consistent withthe plans and policies of the city and is generally consistent with the zoning ordinance.The plans, policies, and ordinances that are currently in place are established to protecteveryone in the city. A CH zone has the potential to create adverse effects on futuredevelopment of the area identified as neighborhood adjacent to the subject property. AnOW zone requires a privacy fence and sales are limited to wholesale trade only whichwill substantially keep the traffic counts lower for this future neighborhood. An OW zonealso makes for a better transition zone between neighborhoods and intense commercialand manufacturing zones.The development of any vacant property will certainly have some effect on the naturalenvironment; however, OW provides a much lower intensity of use than a CH zone andthus has the potential to lower the impact from this project that the natural environment
  • will see. In terms of development of the large swath of land called for the future asneighborhood, an OW zone may allow for suppliers and businesses that will aid thatfuture development, but at the same time provide a better transition than a CH zone will.Proposed Conditions N/AAttachments: excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within the City of San Angelo; Excerpt from the comprehensive plan vision map, highlighting the subject property; excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; aerial photo, highlighting subject property; citizen responses received; Draft minutes from Planning Commission; and draft ordinance.Presentation: Jeff Hintz, PlannerReviewed by: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager (02/13/12)
  • A. Z 12-02: Billy Huffman A request for approval of a zone change from Ranch and Estate (R&E) to Heavy Commercial (CH) on the following property: 1710 Cox Lane, approximately 700 feet west from the intersection of Cox Lane and Ben Ficklin Road, specifically occupying the B & R Subdivision, Section 2, Tract 2 in south central San Angelo.Jeff Hintz, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staffrecommendation of modification to an OW zoning district. There were eightnotifications sent out, with one returned in favor and one returned in opposition. Mr.Hintz handed out these responses for the Commissioners to review. The notificationresponse in opposition was received from the adjacent property immediately acrossCox Lane to the south from the subject property. The area is relativelyundeveloped, as is the area around it. The Vision Plan map does call for the tract tobe a “commercial” designation, with a “neighborhood” designation bordering it to thesouth. Mr. Hintz pointed out the narrowness of Cox Lane. To the south are somecontractor businesses. Mr. Hintz reviewed the options available for this case. Staffrecommends considering an alternative zoning district of OW for this property. Inthe immediate area are uses consistent with contracting and warehousing. Therewas a special use approved in 2002 on the subject property for a self-servicewarehouse, which expired and is not longer valid. Mr. Hintz then reviewed thecriteria for review in this area. In analysis of the request, staff feels the OW zoning isconsistent with the Vision Plan map, as well as the intent of the Zoning Ordinance;conversely, the CH designation does not work with the intent of the ZoningOrdinance by bringing conflicting uses closer to one another. One of the maindifferences between CH and OW is the allowance of retail sales; because of avariance that was given previously from the paving requirements, the likelihood ofCox Lane being fully improved to the type of classification it is intended for (anarterial street) is unlikely. An opaque privacy fence would also be required to screenoutside storage in an OW zoning district, regardless of the surrounding zoning; thislends itself to a better transition than a CH zoning district would provide into aresidential area, such as those to the west and south of this property.Ben Jenkins asked the staff if pavement improvements could be placed on thisrequest. Mr. Hintz explained that the pavement improvements cannot be arequirement of this zone change, as the Commission is not given the authority toplace conditions upon zone changes, only conditional and special uses. BillWynne asked about the history of Cox Lane; staff explained the city limit issue in thisarea. Sebastian Guerrero asked Mr. Hintz about the neighbor to the south and theiropposition to this request. Mr. Hintz explained that the neighbor to the south iszoned OW, the same designation which staff is suggesting for the subject property.The applicant, Billy Huffman, came forward to speak in favor of this request. Heowns a contracting business. He explained that the need for retail is one of hisdesires in the utilization of the property. He plans on building a company there andrelocating for that reason. There is some CH zoning in the area to the north and
  • east. Getting the CH zoning district would allow more versatility for the business atthis location. The Vice-Chairman asked Mr. Hintz if the OW zoning would allow allof the uses that Mr. Huffman would want to include, with the addition of the retailusage to this contracting business. Staff also clarified that all of the uses that Mr.Huffman is wanting to put into place today would not all fit within this category ofOW. However, the CH zoning district is not one that the staff members would bewilling to support because of a variety of issues, including further encroachment intothe area that already has a very large residential component surrounding the lotboth to the west and the south. Joe Grimes clarified the commissioner duties whenlooking at this request in interpreting the Vision Plan. Bill Wynne explained that theline between wholesale and retail is very narrow. Ben Jenkins talked about theincrease of traffic for a CH zoning district, and stated that he would be unable tosupport a CH rezoning so long as that street was not fully improved to allow thetraffic.Richard Salmon, partial owner of the property, came forward to speak in favor of thisrequest. He stated that the economic benefit to the community would be greater ifthis was allowed to be placed at this location. The vision in San Angelo, in hisopinion, has been stagnant. He mentioned that the Commission is responsible foreconomic development and stated that the City would have to expand the street atsome point in time.Sebastian Guerrero asked about the number of employees at this business locationand if there were plans to add more.Bob Elliott came forward to speak in favor of this request. He explained that Mr.Huffman is an ideal neighbor for this location. He stated that there areinconsistencies in the vision for this area. Right-of-way is in place, and there isalready traffic is in place. He went on to explain that a transition should be a burdenon the south side of the street, but not on the north side, since the Vision Planshows it to be some type of commercial. There was some confusion about thedifferences in zoning as opposed to the Vision Plan map categories, which staffattempted to clarify.City staff members addressed the factual basis for the Vision Plan and how it workswith state law. Ms. Fawver clarified what the commercial zoning is in the area anddiscussed the road widening as well as the possibilities for the tract and how it coulddevelop in the future based upon the current characteristics of the tract.Motion, to approve the OW zoning as recommended by staff, was made by BenJenkins and seconded by Bill Wynne. The motion passed unanimously, 6-0.
  • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1710 Cox Lane, approximately 700 feet west from the intersection of Cox Lane and Ben Ficklin Road, specifically occupying the B & R Subdivision, Section 2, Tract 2 in south central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Ranch & Estate (R&E) to Office Warehouse (OW) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYRE: Z 12-02: Billy Huffman WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governingbody for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law withreference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publicationand otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all propertyowners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area andin the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set outherein; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enactedby the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included withinChapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same ishereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generallyand the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 1710Cox Lane, approximately 700 feet west from the intersection of Cox Lane and Ben FicklinRoad, specifically occupying the B & R Subdivision, Section 2, Tract 2 in south central SanAngelo shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Office Warehouse (OW)District.The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of theDirector of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove describedproperty shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code ofOrdinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:
  • SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.INTRODUCED on the 6th day of March, 2012 and finally PASSED, APPROVED ANDADOPTED on this the 20th day of March, 2012. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO by:____________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:by:________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As To Form: Approved As To Content:_________________________ ________________________AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
  • City of San Angelo Finance DepartmentMemo Date: February 2, 2012 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Laura Brooks, Budget Analyst, Sr. Subject: Agenda Item for March 6, 2012 Council Meeting Contact: Morgan Trainer, Budget Manager, 653-6291 Caption: st nd Regular (1 reading) Consent (2 reading) First public hearing and introduction of an Ordinance amending the 2011-2012 Budget for new projects, incomplete projects, and grants. Summary: This proposed amendment contains the following items (additional information attached): City of San Angelo Operating Budget • West Texas Trade Summit • Redistricting and Election Costs • Pay grade correction • Airport Travel and Consultant Services • SADC Neighborhood Blitz • Neighbor Helping Neighbor • Municipal Pool Renovation – Pool Rotunda Roof • Update Airport Layout Plan • Airport Terminal Renovation City of San Angelo Development Corporation Budget • Voter approved projects History: See attached Budget Amendment Request memorandum. Financial Impact: (see attached detail on Exhibit A of the Ordinance) COSA Operating Budget expenditure $ 2,519,636 COSA Development Corporation Budget expenditures $ 4,220,000 Related Vision Item (if applicable): N/A Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Ordinance including Exhibit A; Department request memos Presentation: N/A Publication: N/A Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane
  • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2012, FOR NEW PROJECTS, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS.WHEREAS the City of San Angelo has determined that new projects not included in thecurrent budget should begin, andWHEREAS the City of San Angelo has determined that certain budgeted amounts shouldbe amended due to project changes and unforeseen circumstances, andWHEREAS the resources necessary for these changes are available;NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:The City’s budget for fiscal year 2011-2012 be amended by the amounts contained inExhibit A.INTRODUCED on the 6th day of March, 2012, and APPROVED and ADOPTED on thisthe 20th day of March, 2012. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS __________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:__________________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved as to Content and Form:__________________________________Michael Dane, Finance Director
  • City of San AngeloProposed Budget AmendmentExhibit A Total Total Net Fund Revenue Expenditure Benefit/Number Fund Name Amendment Amendment (Cost)COSA Operating Budget 101 General Fund 108,000 108,000 0 220 Airport Operating 0 26,025 (26,025) 453 CDBG Fund 263,000 263,000 0 514 2011A Issue 21,225 21,225 0 529 Airport PFC 0 533,286 (533,286) 530 Airport FAA Projects 1,406,100 1,406,100 0 531 Airport Capital Projects 162,000 162,000 0 Sub-Total 1,960,325 2,519,636 (559,311)COSA Development CorporationBudget Development Corporation 0 4,220,000 (4,220,000) Fund Total 1,960,325 6,739,636 (4,779,311)
  • City of San AngeloProposed Budget AmendmentAdditional Information Net Benefit/Project/Need Source of Funding Revenue Expense (Cost)West Texas Trade Summit COSA DC & Wells 6,000 6,000 0 Fargo SponsorshipsRedistricting and Election Costs Sales Tax Revenue 97,000 97,000 0Pay grade correction Sale of Scrap Wire 5,000 5,000 0Airport Travel and Consultant Services Airport Fund – Fund 0 26,025 (26,025) BalanceSADC Neighborhood Blitz COSADC Affordable 210,000 210,000 0 Housing FundsNeighbor Helping Neighbor COSADC Affordable 53,000 53,000 0 Housing FundsMunicipal Pool Renovation – Pool Rotunda Local Grants 21,225 21,225 0RoofUpdate Airport Layout Plan PFC Fund, Airport 162,000 324,000 (162,000) Capital ProjectsAirport Terminal Renovation PFC Fund, FAA Grant 1,406,100 1,777,386 (371,286)COSA Development CorporationVoter approved projects Development 0 4,220,000 (4,220,000) Corporation Fund – Fund Balance Totals 1,960,325 6,739,636 (4,779,311)
  • City of San AngeloMemo Date: March 7, 2012 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Maryann R. Vasquez, Recreation Manager Subject: Agenda Item for MARCH 20, 2012 Council Meeting Contact: Maryann R. Vasquez 325-657-4450 Caption: Regular Item- Discussion and consideration of approving the Municipal Pool fees, rental rates, and hours of operation and any action in connection thereto Summary: The San Angelo Municipal Pool offers open swimming and private and semi- private party opportunities for the citizens of San Angelo. The Recreation Division respectfully submits proposed fees and hours of operation for the newly renovated Municipal Pool. We propose a soft opening from May 14 through May 25 and a Grand Opening date of May 26. (Table attached) History: In 2004, the citizens approved the pool renovation as one of the 4B sales tax projects. In 2011, the pool was closed to begin construction. An update on the st project was presented to Council at the February 21 meeting at which staff reported that we would return in March with this item for consideration. Financial Impact: $111,000 estimated revenue Related Vision Item: n/a Other Information/ Staff recommends approval of the proposed pool fees, rates and hours of Recommendation: operation. Attachments: Proposed Fees, Rates, and Hours of Operation Summary Comparison Table Presentation: Power Point Reviewed by Carl White, Parks and Recreation Director Director: Approved by Legal: n/a
  • MUNICIPAL POOL FEES CURRENT vs. PROPOSED CURRENT FEES POOL PROPOSED POOL FEESPublic Swim 12-6 $3/adult $5/ ages 3 and overMonday-Saturday $2/12 and under Free ages 2 and under Free under 2 $3 Groups 20+ $1 Groups 20+Private Parties 1-50 $125 1-100 $250(Hours) 51-75 $150 101-200 $300630 pm-830 pm (Mon-Sat) 76-100 $175 200-300 $400945 pm -1045 pm (Mon-Sat) 101-150 $225 301-400 $5001000 am-1200 pm (Sun) 151-200 $275 401-500 $6001230 pm-230 pm (Sun) 200-300 $300 501-600 $700300 pm-500 pm (Sun)530 pm -730 pm (Sun)800 pm-1000 pm (Sun) $100 depositPool Pass (Season) $50 per person $75 per person $200 family pass (4) $25 each over 4 family membersShaded Table n/a $20/hr (2hr minimum)Reservation(2 available)Lap Swim Hours paid per visit Per visit payment or $75Mon-Sat individual pass(7:00 am-9:00 am)Rotunda (only) n/a $75/hr (2 hr minimum) $100 deposit
  • POOL FEE COMPARISON SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO BROWNS POOL BIG SPRING FLOWER MOUND STEPHENVILLESAN ANGELO CURRENT FEES PROPOSED POOL POOL FEESPublic Swim 12-6 $3/adult $5 / ages 3 yrs and over $5 daily $5/ 2yrs and up $6/adult $4/ 2yrs and upMonday-Saturday $2/12 and under Free/ ages 2 and under Group rates avail. Tue-Fri 12-8 $4/youth $3/65+ Free under 2 $3 Groups 20+ Sat-Sun 11-8 $3/groups over 10 $1 Groups 20+Private Parties 1-50 $125 1-100 $250 n/a $160 2hr + $10 per(Hours) 51-75 $150 101-200 $300 $300/hr lifeguard per hour Monday only630 pm-830 pm (Mon-Sat) 76-100 $175 200-300 $400 2hr minimum every 35 guests $500 hr 2/hr min945 pm -1045 pm (Mon-Sat) 101-150 $225 301-400 $500 requires an additional1000 am-1200 pm (Sun) 151-200 $275 401-500 $600 lifeguard.1230 pm-230 pm (Sun) 200-300 $300 501-600 $700300 pm-500 pm (Sun) $220/ 35 person530 pm -730 pm (Sun) 2hr party party800 pm-1000 pm (Sun) $100 depositPool Pass $50 per person year $75 per person yr $50 per person $51/mo-youth $180 family of 4 $200 family pass (4) $25 $125 + tax/individual 12 uses per pass $75/mo-adult ($10 per family each over 4 family $60/mo-senior member above 4) members $150/mo-familyShaded Table Reservation n/a $20/hr (2hr minimum) n/a n/a n/a $40/hr(2 available)Lap Swim Hours Mon-Sat paid per visit Per visit payment or $75 n/a n/a yes yes(7:00 am-9:00 am) individual passRotunda (only) n/a $75/hr (2 hr minimum) n/a n/a n/a n/a $100 deposit 1|P a g e
  • POOL FEE COMPARISON SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO LEWISVILLE WACO ROUND ROCKSAN ANGELO CURRENT FEES PROPOSED POOL Sun Valley ROCK “N” RIVER POOL FEESPublic Swim 12-6 $3/adult $5 / ages 3 and over $5/adult $6/above 48” $4.50/adultMonday-Saturday $2/12 and under Free/ ages 2 and under $4/youth $4/below 48” $3.50/child Free under 2 $3 Groups 20+ $4/spectators $3.50/senior 55+ $1 Groups 20+ Free 3 and underPrivate Parties 1-50 $125 1-100 guest $250 Group parties of(Hours) 51-75 $150 101-200 $300 more than 24 may n/a n/a630 pm-830 pm (Mon-Sat) 76-100 $175 200-300 $400 be declined945 pm -1045 pm (Mon-Sat) 101-150 $225 301-400 $5001000 am-1200 pm (Sun) 151-200 $2751230 pm-230 pm (Sun) 200-300 $300 $100 deposit300 pm-500 pm (Sun)530 pm -730 pm (Sun)800 pm-1000 pm (Sun)Pool Pass $50 per person year $75 per person yr $65/individual n/a 10 visit pass $200 family pass (4) $25 $65/non-resident $26.25 child/senior each over 4 family $50/resident $33.75 adult members $175/family (6) Season Pass $75 child res $125 child non-res $112 adult res $162 adult non-res Family $225 res $325 non-resShaded Table Reservation n/a $20/hr (2hr minimum) n/a n/a n/a(2 available)Lap Swim Hours Mon-Sat paid per visit Per visit payment or $75 yes yes n/a(7:00 am-9:00 am) individual passRotunda (only) n/a $75/hr (2 hr minimum) n/a n/a n/a $100 deposit 2|P a g e
  • City of San AngeloMemo Date: March 9, 2012 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Carl White, Director of Parks & Recreation Subject: Agenda Item for March 20, 2012 Council Meeting Contact: David Knapp, Construction Manager, 657-4450 Caption: Regular Item Consideration of approving the recommendation for PK 03-11 /Concho River Water Feature to begin negotiations with Wesco Fountains of North Venice, Florida for proposal and installation of a fountain/water feature in the Concho River, authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a contract and any related documents with a not-to-exceed amount of $550,000.00. Summary: The City initiated a Request For Proposals (RFP) in November 2011 for the design and construction of a water feature in the Concho River as an enhancement to the work already being done along the river banks. The proposed location of the water feature is behind the River Stage between Oakes Street & Chadbourne Street Bridges. Proposals were received in December 2011 and after a committee review of the RFP, two firms were selected to present their conceptual ideas for the water feature. After presentations in late February 2012, the committee has reviewed and scored the final proposals and recommends Wesco Fountains for the design and installation of the water feature. History: During the design of the Concho River Improvements and Bank Stabilization project it became clear that several members of council wanted to incorporate a water feature into the project that would become a focal point as well as a landmark for the city. In November 2011, the City Issued a RFP to potential teams to provide complete design/build services for a “water feature” in the Concho River. Four proposals were received on December 13, 2011 and were evaluated by a six-member committee. The two most qualified firms were selected to present their concept of what a water feature could be for San Angelo. They presented to the committee in February 2012. Wesco (576 Points) Wesco Fountains has extensive experience in the fountain design business. They addressed our concerns on the operation and maintenance of the fountains; provided two design options showing us the potential for a water feature. Roman Fountains/Greenscapes (516 Points) Greenscapes was very knowledgeable in the operation & maintenance of the fountains and presented options to improve the water quality in the river. They lacked a strong vision for the water feature and how it would integrate with the bridge lights.
  • Financial Impact: The budget for the proposed water feature is $500,000 with a contingency of $250,000 for the River Project. If unforeseen issues are limited and changes are kept to a minimum for the River Project, it is anticipated that $50,000 of the River contingency could be added to the Water feature budget. The total potential expenditure would be $550,000. The water feature budget is to include all permits & fees, design services, equipment and installation with training and programming.Related Vision Item n/a(if applicable):Other Information/ City Staff recommends negotiating with Wesco Fountains of North Venice, Florida forRecommendation: the final design and installation of the water feature to work within the original River Project budget and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a contract and any related documents for the budget of $500,000 and potentially $50,000 in contingency for a total not-to-exceed amount of $550,000.00.Attachments: RFP Acknowledgement, Initial and Finalist Scoring SheetPresentation: PowerPoint presentation of conceptsPublication: n/aReviewed by Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager, March 6, 2012Director:Approved by Legal: n/a
  • City of San Angelo Proposal Acknowledgment * RFP: PK-03-11/Water Feature Design Date: December 13, 2011 Proposals Received City, State 1 Fountains by Design Bayfield CO 2 Greenscape Pump Carrolton TX 3 Wesco Fountains North Venice FL 4 Windmill Development San Angelo TX RFP Invitations Sent To: Aqua Terra Grand Prairie TX Aquatec Fountains Phoenix AZ Aquatic Eco-Systems, Inc. Apopka FL Atlantic Fountains, LLC Clinton CT Chester Pool Systems New Albany IN Crystal Fountains Toronto, Ontario Canada Custom Fountains, Inc. Mason OH Fountain Doctors, LLC Orlando FL Fountains by Design Bayfield CO Hall Fountains, Inc. Ft. Lauderdale FL Hobbs Architectural Fountains Atlanta GA Hydro Dramatics St. Louis MO Kusser Fountains Works Tampa FL LI Fountain Company Ronkonkoma NY Midwest Tropical Lincolnwood IL Pond & Lake, Inc. Cincinnati OH Progressive Commercial Aquatics Houston TX Roman Fountains Albuquerque NM Waterworks International High Ridge MONOTE: Include this form with your Agenda MemoC:Documents and Settingsroger.banks.COSADOMAINLocal SettingsTemporary Internet FilesContent.Outlook16UQHQ7WRFP Acknowledgement Wksht
  • Proposal Acknowledgment * RFP: PK-03-11/Water Feature Design Date: December 13, 2011 Carl White Roman Fountains by Fountains / Wesco Windmill Category Max Pts Design Greenscape Fountains Development Water Fountain Experience 20 14 20 20 10 History of Successful Performance 20 14 20 20 10 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 14 20 20 10 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 24 16 22 10 Warranty & Product Support 15 0 10 10 0 Total Score 100 66 86 92 40 Rank 3 2 1 4 David Knapp Roman Fountains by Fountains / Wesco Windmill Category Points Design Greenscape Fountains Development Water Fountain Experience 20 15 20 20 5 History of Successful Performance 20 5 20 20 5 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 15 20 20 5 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 25 20 22 5 Warranty & Product Support 15 5 15 15 5 0 0 Total Score 100 65 95 97 25 Rank 3 2 1 4 Craig Kinney Roman Fountains by Fountains / Wesco Windmill Category Points Design Greenscape Fountains Development Water Fountain Experience 20 10 20 20 1 History of Successful Performance 20 5 20 20 1 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 10 20 20 1 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 5 5 15 1 Warranty & Product Support 15 10 15 15 3 0 0 Total Score 100 40 80 90 7 Rank 3 2 1 4Z:Concho River ImprovementsFOUNTAINEvaluationsPK0311 RFP Acknowledgement Wksht-02 Page 1 of 2
  • Proposal Acknowledgment * RFP: PK-03-11/Water Feature Design Date: December 13, 2011 Rick Weise Roman Fountains by Fountains / Wesco Windmill Category Points Design Greenscape Fountains Development Water Fountain Experience 20 4 18 18 3 History of Successful Performance 20 4 18 18 1 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 3 18 18 2 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 20 16 23 0 Warranty & Product Support 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Score 100 31 70 77 6 Rank 3 2 1 4 Kendal Hirschfeld Roman Fountains by Fountains / Wesco Windmill Category Points Design Greenscape Fountains Development Water Fountain Experience 20 15 20 20 5 History of Successful Performance 20 15 20 20 5 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 15 20 20 5 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 20 25 25 5 Warranty & Product Support 15 8 15 15 5 0 0 Total Score 100 73 100 100 25 Rank 3 1 1 4 Alvin New Roman Fountains by Fountains / Wesco Windmill Category Points Design Greenscape Fountains Development Water Fountain Experience 20 15 20 20 0 History of Successful Performance 20 10 20 20 0 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 10 20 20 10 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 25 25 25 15 Warranty & Product Support 15 10 15 15 15 0 0 0 Total Score 100 70 100 100 40 Rank 3 1 1 4 Committee Member Summary Roman Total Fountains by Fountains / Wesco Windmill Category Points Design Greenscape Fountains Development Water Fountain Experience 120 73 118 118 24 History of Successful Performance 120 53 118 118 22 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 120 67 118 118 33 Creativity and Vision for Feature 150 119 107 132 36 Warranty & Product Support 90 33 70 70 28 0 0 Total Score 600 345 531 556 143 Rank 3 2 1 4 Attach a Written Justification for each companys ranking and forward to Purchasing NOTE: Attached this form and the Written Justification to your Agenda Background MemoZ:Concho River ImprovementsFOUNTAINEvaluationsPK0311 RFP Acknowledgement Wksht-02 Page 2 of 2
  • Proposal Acknowledgment * RFP: PK-03-11/Water Feature Design Date: December 13, 2011 Date of Presentation: February 17, 2012 Carl White Roman Fountains / Wesco Category Max Pts Greenscape Fountains Water Fountain Experience 20 20 20 History of Successful Performance 20 20 20 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 20 20 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 20 24 Warranty & Product Support 15 12 12 Total Score 100 92 96 Rank 2 1 David Knapp Roman Fountains / Wesco Category Points Greenscape Fountains Water Fountain Experience 20 20 20 History of Successful Performance 20 20 20 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 20 20 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 20 24 Warranty & Product Support 15 15 15 0 0 Total Score 100 95 99 Rank 2 1 Craig Kinney Roman Fountains / Wesco Category Points Greenscape Fountains Water Fountain Experience 20 20 20 History of Successful Performance 20 15 15 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 20 20 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 18 20 Warranty & Product Support 15 5 10 0 0 Total Score 100 78 85 Rank 2 1Z:Concho River ImprovementsFOUNTAINEvaluationsPK0311 RFP Acknowledgement Wksht-FINAL. Page 1 of 2
  • Proposal Acknowledgment * RFP: PK-03-11/Water Feature Design Date: December 13, 2011 Rick Weise Roman Fountains / Wesco Category Points Greenscape Fountains Water Fountain Experience 20 19 19 History of Successful Performance 20 19 19 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 17 19 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 20 24 Warranty & Product Support 15 14 15 0 0 Total Score 100 89 96 Rank 2 1 Kendal Hirschfeld Roman Fountains / Wesco Category Points Greenscape Fountains Water Fountain Experience 20 15 20 History of Successful Performance 20 20 20 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 15 20 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 15 25 Warranty & Product Support 15 10 15 0 0 Total Score 100 75 100 Rank 2 1 Alvin New Roman Fountains / Wesco Category Points Greenscape Fountains Water Fountain Experience 20 20 20 History of Successful Performance 20 20 20 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 20 20 20 Creativity and Vision for Feature 25 15 25 Warranty & Product Support 15 12 15 0 0 0 Total Score 100 87 100 Rank 2 1 Committee Member Summary Roman Total Fountains / Wesco Category Points Greenscape Fountains Water Fountain Experience 120 114 119 History of Successful Performance 120 114 114 Staffing Capabilities (Design/Installation) 120 112 119 Creativity and Vision for Feature 150 108 142 Warranty & Product Support 90 68 82 0 0 Total Score 600 516 576 Rank 2 1 Attach a Written Justification for each companys ranking and forward to Purchasing NOTE: Attached this form and the Written Justification to your Agenda Background MemoZ:Concho River ImprovementsFOUNTAINEvaluationsPK0311 RFP Acknowledgement Wksht-FINAL. Page 2 of 2
  • San Angelo Metropolitan Planning OrganizationMemo Date: March 13, 2012 To: Mayor and City Council members From: Doray Hill, Jr., Interim Director Subject: Agenda Item for March 20, 2012 City Council Meeting Contact: Doray Hill, Jr. Interim Director, San Angelo Metropolitan Planning Organization 325.481.2800 -And- John Dewitt, Director, Transportation Planning and Development, San Angelo TxDOT 325.947.9265 Caption: Presentation of the Fiscal Year 2013-2016 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for the 15 counties of TxDOT’s San Angelo District, including the San Angelo urban area and solicitation of public comment on San Angelo’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Fiscal Years 2013-2016Summary: The San Angelo District, Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is presenting highwayprojects that will be listed in the Fiscal Year 2013-2016 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program(STIP). The San Angelo Metropolitan Planning Organization (SA-MPO) is presenting highway and transitprojects that will be listed in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Fiscal Years 2013-2016.History:The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)contains several requirements related to metropolitan and statewide planning. This documentincorporates metropolitan and rural area Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs) into a 2013-2016 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) as required under Title 23, US Code,Section 135 (f) (1), Statewide Planning. Page 1 of 2
  • The Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is the State’s four-year capital improvementprogram developed cooperatively by local and state transportation entities that includes a list of multi-modal (e.g., highway, transit, bicycle, etc.) transportation projects drawn from and consistent with a rurallong-range plan (statewide plan), or Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) long range plans know asa Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). Projects listed in the Program include projects that are inmetropolitan planning areas and in rural areas.San Angelo’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a four-year document that consists of street,highway, and transit projects that are funded with federal, state, and local funds. Projects listed in the TIPare projects that are expected to be constructed during this four-year period and are within the SanAngelo MPO boundary.The STIP and TIP serve as short-term programming documents that lists approximately four years offunded (committed from local, state, and federal sources) transportation projects designed to construct,complete, implement, operate, and maintain regional and statewide transportation systems inaccordance with the recommendations of the long-range statewide transportation plan or TIP.Projects listed in both documents follow a standardized public involvement process in which publicnotices, public hearings, and public comments must be included. Each project that is included in theabove mentioned documents are consistent with these guidelines and meet applicable federal and stateregulations and requirements.Financial Impact: n/aRelated Vision Item (if applicable): n/aNotification: n/aAttachments: n/aPresentation: John DeWitt (Statewide Transportation Improvement Program) Doray Hill, Jr. (Transportation Improvement Program)Publication: n/a
  • City of San AngeloMemo Date: March 13, 2012 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Elizabeth Grindstaff, Assistant City Manager Subject: Agenda Item for March 20, 2012 Council Meeting Contact: Elizabeth Grindstaff, 325.657.4241 Caption: Regular Agenda Item Review of City Hall, Library, and Auditorium budgets and any action thereto, including: a. Discussion and possible action regarding the use of remaining funds for furnishings, plaza development, landscaping, lighting, etc. b. Discussion and possible action regarding funding for City Hall and Library office furniture and fixtures c. Discussion and possible action regarding the new naming of the historic Library building d. Discussion and possible action regarding operational changes associated with occupancy of the rehabilitated buildings As the City Hall Complex Project nears construction completion, it is necessary to review the revised budget, reallocate available funds, and determine if additional Summary: funds are necessary to complete the project as desired by the public. Although the construction project is within budget, there are additional amenities that staff will present to Council for its consideration that are outside of the construction contract. Bids have been received for furniture and different elements of hardscape and landscape installation. Staff seeks direction from the Council on the preferred levels of finish out. History: In July of 2008, the City of San Angelo contracted with Killis Almond Architects for a Master Plan for the rehabilitation of the City Hall basement. By April of 2009, City Council had approved an amendment to the original contract to include a/e fees for all floors of City Hall and the Health Building, as well as future phases to complete the City Hall plaza and complex. The City Council later approved design plans that: • included both the City Hall and old Library Building • required that both buildings be vacated during construction to eliminate the likelihood of conflicts between customers, staff, and contractors, all vying for one slow and undependable elevator, • separated demolition from the larger construction contract to allow for greater access to the historic structure to reduce padded bids caused by limited knowledge of the building. (This work was eventually done by prisoners at WC3.) • allowed for the examination of different and cooling systems • on a 18 month occupancy
  • The Council’s action also approved: • Leasing of medical office space to accommodate WIC and Nursing functions • Moving contents of both buildings to new temporary location. (Staff boxed) • Installing IT infrastructure into temporary location, including Ethernet, etc. In July of 2010, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Stoddard Construction of Bulverde to complete the rehabs. The original contract anticipated completion around August of 2011, but the project was later modified to include a basement annex to accommodate both the chiller equipment and future back-of-stage expansion for use of the City Auditorium.Financial Impact: A discussion is necessary to determine the Council’s priorities with regard to furnishings, hardscaping, and landscaping, by redirecting budgeted funds and/or considering additional funding sources.Related Vision Item Downtown Revitalization(if applicable):Other Information/ Staff recommends that funds be rebudgeted (as in the availability of the $125,000Recommendation: from FUMC) to purchase uniform and professional modular furnishings for newly created work spaces, and to consider the reconfiguration of sidewalks, ADA ramps, drought tolerant landscaping, etc. around the newly rehabilitated buildings.Attachments: NonePresentation: A PowerPoint Presentation will be given.Publication: NAReviewed by NADirector:Approved by Legal: NA
  • City of San AngeloMemo Date: March 9, 2012 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Lisa Marley, Director of Human Resources and Risk Management Subject: Agenda Item for March 20, 2012 Council Meeting Caption: Regular Item Presentation from and interview of Executive Search Firms for consideration of the recruitment of the City Manager position, and any action in connection thereto: a. Robert Slavin, President, Slavin Management Consultants; b. Alan Taylor, Senior Vice President, Strategic Government Resources (SGR). _________________________________________________________________________________ Summary: The work of the sub-committee reviewed the proposals and narrowed the list of executive search firms from twelve (12) to two (2). Both firms will make presentations to and be interviewed by the City Council. History: At the February 21, 2012 Council meeting, a sub-committee was named to review the proposals received from executive search firms for the recruitment of candidates for the City Manager position. The sub-committee met on February 29, 2012. Sub-committee members Charlotte Farmer, Kendall Hirschfeld, Johnny Silvas and Lisa Marley were in attendance. Financial Impact: To be determined once a firm is selected. Attachments: 1. Proposal from Slavin Management Consultants. 2. Proposal from Strategic Government Resources (SGR). Presented and Reviewed by: Lisa Marley, Director of Human Resources and Risk Management, March 9, 2012.
  • Proposal for Executive Search ServicesCity ManagerCity of San Angelo, TexasFebruary 2012 Strategic Government Resources Ron Holifield, Principal PO Box 1642 Keller, Texas 76244 214-676-1691 Ron@GovernmentResource.com
  • February 15, 2012Lisa MarleyDirector of Human ResourcesCity of San Angelo106 S. Chadbourne StreetSan Angelo, Texas 76902Dear Ms. Marley:Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to assist the City of San Angelo in yoursearch for a new City Manager.This proposal provides a comprehensive overview of the approach we would take in yoursearch, including our qualifications, scope of work, references, and the standard work plan wewould follow in conducting your search for a new City Manager as well as complete details onprofessional fees and expenses.I founded SGR in 1999 and am the sole owner. SGR’s corporate headquarters is in Keller,Texas, and we also have satellite offices in Austin-Texas, Bloomington Springs‐Tennessee, andFort Rucker‐Alabama. SGR is widely recognized as one of the leading local governmentexecutive search firms, and many of our clients have used our services for multiple keypositions, reflecting the quality of our work and the long‐term nature of our relationships.While we have a broad array of search experience, our specialty is conducting executivesearches for high quality of life cities in Texas and Oklahoma similar to San Angelo.SGR has the unique ability to provide a personalized and comprehensive search service tomeet your needs. The not-to-exceed price in this proposal includes: as many briefings withcity council as needed, recorded online interviews with semifinalist candidates to save youmoney before you fly in candidates for in-person interviews, in-depth media reports on eachfinalist candidate, psychometric assessment reports on each finalist candidate, and abackground investigation report on your top candidate. No other firm can offer such acomprehensive list of services at a cost-effective price.P O Box 1642 Keller, Texas 76244 817-337-8581 www.GovernmentResource.com
  • I would like to draw your attention to a few key items that distinguish SGR from othersearch firms:  SGR’s website, where this position would be posted, received over 15,000 local government officials visiting it last month, with over 250,000 page hits – more than any other local government search firm website in the nation.  SGR’s job board (separate website), where this job will also be posted, is the largest local government job board in the nation, with an additional 8,000 local government job seekers visiting it each month – more than any other municipal job board.  My “10 in 10 Leadership and Innovation Update” reaches 7,000 of the most innovative and leading edge thinkers in local government in the nation each week. This position would also be posted in that newsletter and no other search firm has anything similar to reach the real opinion leaders in all 50 states.  I speak at an average of one state or national conference per month providing higher visibility and a stronger network among leading financial and municipal officials than any other firm comes close to.  SGR trains over 1,000 city employees each month in live training classes.  We have online training clients in 11 states.  SGR has been featured in Entrepreneur Magazine, American Express Open Forum, Texas Event Planning, and the Ladders among others due to our reputation for dramatic customer service, and our innovative business strategies that are changing the way local government recruits, selects, and develops their executives.Of course with all of that... only one thing matters... results! We are so confident of ourability to deliver exceptional results that SGR offers the strongest guarantee in the searchindustry. If a candidate selected in our process leaves in less than two years, for anyreason whatsoever, we will conduct the search again for no additional professional fee, noquestions asked.SGR is the only search firm that can lay claim to having had only one department headplacement not work out in almost 15 years of conducting searches. This proposal lists all ofour clients, and we welcome you to call any of them blind. The simple fact is that no otherfirm can touch our reputation for being trusted by both clients and candidates, and forsuccessful long term placements.Alan Taylor and I will personally serve as the co-managers for your search and will handleall aspects of it related to candidate and client interaction. This includes all onsiteinterviews with key city staff, ongoing status reports to the City, direct recruitmentactivities, responses to prospect inquiries, initial triage evaluation of resumes, preliminary
  • interviews with candidates, facilitation of meetings to select Semifinalists and again toselect Finalists, and assistance in employment negotiations with the candidate.The Amarillo newspaper editorialized that our search process “approached perfection”and praised the City for the outstanding way the search process was conducted and how itbuilt confidence in the community about the ultimate selection. A simple Google searchwill reveal that we are the only major search firm that has never had a single article wherea city official was critical of SGR. By contrast, our two largest competitors have had electedofficials reach such levels of frustration that they have been willing to criticize the firm andtheir processes in the newspaper in the middle of a search!We are truly excited about the prospect of doing this search for the City of San Angelo. Ilook forward to discussing in more detail how we can help you select an exceptional CityManager and am available to visit in person with you at your convenience. The City of SanAngelo is a high quality of life community, and is deserving of a search firm who will becommitted to a home run City Manager selection. I hope you will give us the opportunityto visit with you in person about the possibilities.Respectfully submitted,Ron HolifieldCEOSGR Executive SearchRon@GovernmentResource.com214-676-1691
  • NoticeThis proposal has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of San Angelo,Texas.All of the contents herein are proprietary and confidential information ownedby SGR Executive Search.Other than as required by law, no information contained herein may bereleased or revealed in any way without the approval of SGR Executive Search.
  • Table of ContentsCOMPANY PROFILE TAB-1BACKGROUND 1SGR CORE TEAM 1OFFICE LOCATIONS 2QUALIFICATIONS TAB-2THE SGR ADVANTAGE 3THREE DIMENSIONS OF EXECUTIVE RECRUITMENT EXPERIENCE 6KEY PERSONNEL FOR THIS PROJECT 8PROJECT METHODOLOGY AND WORK PLAN TAB-3OVERVIEW 9ORGANIZATIONAL INQUIRY AND ANALYSIS 10ADVERTISING AND RECRUITMENT 11INITIAL SCREENING AND REVIEW 12EVALUATION OF QUARTERFINALIST CANDIDATES 13EVALUATION OF SEMIFINALIST CANDIDATES 13EVALUATION OF FINALIST CANDIDATES 14CLOSING THE DEAL 16PROPOSED TIMELINE 18PROJECT COST 19PROVISION OF SERVICE GUARANTEE 21APPENDICESRESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL TAB-4CLIENT LIST TAB-5REFERENCES TAB-6UNSOLICITED FEEDBACK TAB-7SAMPLE POSITION PROFILE BROCHURE TAB-8SAMPLE DISC PPSS BEHAVIORAL AND DISC MANAGEMENT PROFILE REPORTS TAB-9SAMPLE COMPREHENSIVE BACKGROUND SCREENING REPORT TAB-10
  • Company ProfileBackgroundStrategic Government Resources (SGR) was founded in 1999 and is fully owned byformer City Manager Ron Holifield.Ron spent two high profile decades in city management, which included service as CityManager in several Texas cities. He left city management in 1996 and purchasedGovernment Relations Specialists, a small company that specialized in representingcompanies that do business with government at all levels. In a little over three years, hedoubled the size of the company, growing it into one of the 50 largest lobby firms inTexas. However, Ron missed the sense of making a difference that city managementhad provided. In response, he sold that company in 1999 and founded SGR for theexpress purpose of helping to transform local government through employeerecruitment, selection, assessment, training, development, coaching, and career pathplanning.SGR is organized into three primary business lines, Executive Recruitment, EmployeeDevelopment, and Consulting and is recognized as one of the leading local governmentexecutive search firms in Texas. Many of our clients have used our services for multiplekey positions, reflecting the high quality of our work and the long-term nature of ourrelationships.SGR Core TeamSGR’s core team includes:  Ron Holifield, Chief Executive Officer  Cynthia Leach, Chief Operating Officer  Greg Anderson, President, Online Learning  Alan Taylor, Senior Vice President, Executive Search  Bill Peterson, Senior Vice President, Executive Search  Chester Nolen, Senior Vice President, Executive Search  Howard Giles, Senior Vice President, Executive Search  Krisa Delacruz, Director of Member Services  Hope Ekwue, Director of Communications  Laurie Groover, Finance Manager  Melissa Valentine, Administrative Assistant  Lauren Holifield, Lean Processes Coordinator  Mike Gibson, Director of Curriculum  Cindy Hanna, Director of Operations 1
  • Office LocationsSGR’s corporate headquarters is in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metro area in Keller, Texas.SGR also has satellite offices in Austin-Texas, Bloomington Springs-Tennessee and FortRucker-Alabama. 2
  • QualificationsThe SGR AdvantageSGR’s executive recruiting services are unequaled. SGR provides a high degree of personalattention to each executive search that we conduct, and our role is to find the person who isthe very best possible match for you. SGR devotes a tremendous amount of energy tounderstanding your organization’s unique culture, environment, and local issues to ensure agreat “fit” from values, philosophy, and management style perspectives.Finding “qualified” candidates is not very difficult…the hard part is finding qualified candidateswho are the right “fit” for your organization. A “leading edge” candidate and a “safe harbor”candidate often look the same on paper but will have profoundly different impacts on yourorganization. SGR brings practical experience from years of city management and from almosttwo decades of successful recruitment.The NetworkSGR maintains one of the most extensive private networks of local government professionals inthe nation. In addition to providing employee recruitment and development services to almost200 cities, counties and utility districts in four states, SGR previously managed memberrelations for over 250 government agencies in 23 states for the Innovation Groups (IG).Ron Holifield, Alan Taylor, Bill Peterson, Chester Nolen, Ron Robinson, and Howard Giles eachhave a national network of relationships developed through years of public service. While yourproject will be managed by Alan Taylor, Senior Vice President (resume attached), with thedirect involvement of CEO Ron Holifield, the entire group works as a team to leverage each oftheir personal national networks to assist with each search. This team brings over 150 years ofpublic service experience in Texas, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, New Mexico and Ohio. In addition,SGR staff members are active on a national basis, in both local government organizations andprofessional associations. Many SGR staff members frequently speak and write on issues ofinterest to local government executives.Only SGR can work all of the relevant networks as a peer and insider, resulting in betterrecruitment, better investigation, better intelligence, better information, and better finaldecisions.AccessibilityYour search will be handled directly by Ron Holifield, CEO, and Alan Taylor, Senior VicePresident. Ron and Alan are accessible at all times throughout the search process and can bereached by candidates or clients, even at night and on weekends, on cell phone, home phone,or via email. 3
  • Trust of CandidatesSGR has a track record of remarkable confidentiality and providing wise counsel to candidatesand next generation leaders; we have earned their trust. As a result, SGR is typically able to getexceptional prospects to become candidates, even if they have declined to become involved inother search processes, merely because candidates trust SGR to assess the situation well, tocommunicate honestly and bluntly, and to maintain their confidentiality.Comprehensive Needs AssessmentSGR invests an extraordinary amount of effort into understanding the organizational andcommunity culture, environment, and local issues that shape what you are looking for in anexecutive leader, how SGR can most effectively look for the right match for you, and how SGRcan most effectively assist prospective candidates in understanding your unique needs andcircumstances.Responsive to YouWhen a problem arises or you have questions, you can count on SGR staff to be available, to beprepared, and to respond promptly.Listening to Your Unique NeedsSGR is more interested in listening than in talking. Some firms depend on their tried and truestable of reliable candidates. These firms do not really need to listen to the client because thesearch will result in the same list of finalists, no matter what type of information they receivefrom the client. SGR devotes tremendous energy to actively listening to you and helping youdefine and articulate your needs. SGR does not just go through the motions and then provideyou with a list of qualified names from a stable of regulars. SGR works hard to conduct acomprehensive search that is unique to you. SGR’s efforts will be driven by your needs, not bywhat is convenient for us.No SurprisesOne of the worst things that can happen for you is to get surprised with undisclosedinformation about a finalist, especially if the surprise comes in the form of a newspaper articlethat you find out about from your critics. A Google search of the firms you are considering willreveal the ones who have a track record of sloppy work that results in embarrassing surprisesfor their clients. SGR does thorough background work on candidates to minimize the chancefor surprises and has never had one single client embarrassed by surprises about one of ourcandidates. Additionally, SGR places very high value on continuous and effectivecommunication with our clients.High Quality Briefing Books and Other DocumentsSGR is committed to producing professional documents that are easy for the client to read andinterpret. SGR will produce professional and thorough briefing books for each of the meetingswith the Search Committee. In addition, SGR will produce a high quality electronic (pdf)position profile brochure for distribution to prospective candidates. A sample brochure isincluded behind TAB-8 in the Appendices section of this document. 4
  • Comprehensive Background Investigation ReportsSGR provides the most comprehensive background investigations in the industry, and we arethe only search firm to use a licensed private investigation firm for these services. We havepartnered with First Check, a licensed private investigations company, to perform ouremployment screening. A sample Background Screening Report is included behind TAB-10 inthe Appendices section of this document.Recorded Online Interviews with CandidatesSGR offers the option of recording short videos of candidates answering three to five questions.These videos are then mailed to the search committee on a flash drive to review prior to thenext briefing. This allows the search committee to see candidates in an interview situationprior to the finalist stage of the search process and without having to pay for travel expenses.Comprehensive Media ReportsAt the client’s request, SGR will produce a comprehensive Media Report on one or morecandidates. Each Media Report is compiled from information gathered using our proprietaryonline search process. This process is far superior to the one dimensional efforts of ourcompetitors who rely on automated media checks necessary for them to maintain their massproduction searches. The report length may be as long as 350 pages per candidate and mayinclude news articles, links to video interviews, blog posts by residents, etc. No other firmprovides as comprehensive of media reports as SGR.Psychometric AssessmentsSGR uses state-of-the-art psychometric assessments of candidates to ensure a detailedunderstanding of how candidates will lead and manage an organization. The psychometricanalyses also provide valuable information regarding candidates’ strengths and weaknesses.Equal Opportunity CommitmentSGR strongly believes in equal opportunity. SGR does not discriminate and is careful to followboth the letter and the spirit of laws regarding equal employment opportunities and non-discrimination. More importantly, however, SGR believes that equal opportunity is an ethicalissue. SGR quite simply will not enter into an engagement with an entity or organization thatdirects, or expects, that bias should, or will be, demonstrated on any basis other than thosefactors that have a bearing on the ability of the candidate to do the job.You can anticipate that SGR will make a serious and sincere effort to include qualified womenand minority candidates in the finalist pool. Although SGR obviously cannot, and would not,guarantee the makeup of the finalist group, SGR does have relationships and contactsnationwide to encourage the meaningful participation of women and minority candidates. SGRhas a strong history and track record of bringing outstanding female and minority candidatesinto client search processes. 5
  • Superior Experience and Track RecordSGR has an unblemished reputation for excellence among both candidates and clients. Many ofour clients have used our services for multiple key positions, reflecting the high quality of ourwork and the long-term nature of our relationships. For example, when we conducted theAmarillo City Manager search, the local newspaper editorialized that our search process had“approached perfection” and praised the elected officials for conducting such a rigorousprocess. In well over a decade of conducting executive searches, we have only one single citymanager placement who did not work out. In addition, most of our placements are still in thesame position many years later due to the extensive work we do ensuring that the placement isan excellent match from the outset. Our client list can be found behind TAB-5 in theAppendices section of this document.Practicing the Golden RuleAs a result of our years of experience in local government, SGR understands what you areexperiencing, how as executive search consultants we can make your life easier, and what willfrustrate you. In short, SGR believes in the Golden Rule as a matter of philosophy, but SGR isable to practice the Golden Rule as a matter of experience.CostFor a variety of reasons that are detailed in this proposal, SGR will provide the most cost-effective executive search for your city. Some firms low ball their price, and make up for it byreducing the amount of time they commit, or charging extra for additional time required. SGRgive you a fixed price and then is with you until the end regardless of how many hours arerequired.Five Way GuaranteeSGR provides the strongest guarantee in the industry. 1) Our price is our price. You will neverbe charged an additional professional fee because we need to come to another meeting orspend extra time. 2) You always have 24/7 cell and home contact access to both the recruiterand the company CEO. 3) If you do not find the right candidate, we will start the process overfrom scratch at no additional cost to you. 4) If we place a candidate who stays less than twoyears, we will conduct the search again at no cost. And 5) if we place a candidate with you, wewill not solicit them for another job for at least five years.Three Dimensions of Executive Recruitment ExperienceThe great misunderstanding about executive recruitment is that it is about finding a pool ofqualified candidates. As a result, search firms brag about the large number of qualifiedcandidates they find. The truth is that finding qualified candidates is not very difficult, andquite honestly, should not occupy the bulk of a recruiter’s time.The real work of executive recruitment should be in determining which individuals out of alarge pool of easily-identified, qualified candidates are actually an excellent match for theculture, philosophy, leadership environment, challenges, and opportunities that are unique to 6
  • your city. Even within the same organization, leadership needs differ depending upon thecommunity life cycle stage.There are three dimensions of the executive recruitment experience that will determinewhether you get “adequate” or “exceptional” results.Understanding Roles and ResponsibilitiesThe first dimension of experience ensures an understanding of the specific roles andresponsibilities of the position that is being filled. There are both formal and informalstructures within every organization, and all too often strong candidates fail as new leadersbecause, “It wasn’t what I expected.” SGR addresses this dimension of experience in two ways.First, SGR places heavy emphasis upon knowing and understanding the organization better thanthey know themselves. Our searches are front-loaded to ensure we devote adequate time toan intimate understanding of both the formal and informal structures and expectations of theposition to ensure we find the right “fit.”Second, SGR is the only major search firm with such depth of experience in actually managingorganizations of comparable complexity and size. As a result, we are uniquely capable andprepared to ask the right questions to develop an intimate understanding of the formal andinformal roles and responsibilities of this position.Understanding Organizational Culture and EnvironmentThe second dimension of experience ensures an understanding of organizational culture andenvironment. SGR devotes tremendous energy to understanding your unique culture andenvironment and goals to ensure a great “fit” from values, philosophy, and management styleperspectives. The recruiter must invest the time and energy on the front end to intimatelyunderstand the environment, culture, challenges, and opportunities of the organization. Weensure we have that understanding before we ever place ads or identify candidates.Successful Candidate RecruitmentThe first two dimensions of experience are inwardly focused on the organization and form thefoundation for a successful executive search. This third dimension is focused outside of theorganization and is equally important, but tends to be the only one of the three dimensions ofexperience most search firms address. This explains why so many searches yield an initial list ofimpressive candidates but struggle to come to an enthusiastic conclusion.SGR takes pride in not being a mass production search firm like our competitors. By conductingfewer executive searches each year, SGR can deliver a very high quality “match” when aselection is made. SGR does not believe our role is to simply provide the client with a largenumber of qualified candidates…you can do that on your own. SGR’s role is to find the personwho is the very best possible match for you. This can only be accomplished with SGR’s highdegree of personal attention, which is not possible in a high volume, mass productionenvironment. 7
  • Key Personnel for this ProjectRon Holifield, CEORon Holifield spent 17 high profile years in city management before entering the private sector.He served as Assistant City Manager in Plano, Texas, City Manager in Garland, Texas, and CityManager in three other mid-size and smaller cities. Ron is a frequent speaker at citymanagement conferences nationwide. In addition, he has written numerous articles and was aperiodic contributor to Texas City Manager Magazine on Innovations That Make a Difference.Ron has served on numerous state and national committees and is an active member of theInternational City/County Management Association (ICMA), the Texas City ManagementAssociation (TCMA), Urban Management Assistants of North Texas (UMANT), and several otherregional organizations. He holds a BA from Abilene Christian University, and an MPA fromTexas Tech.Ron brings strength to the executive recruitment profession with his extensive experience as acity manager. Numerous professionals around the nation have worked with Ron over his longcareer, giving SGR a network among municipal management professionals that is unequaled.Ron also brings a unique ability to evaluate candidates from the perspective of a city managerand assist city officials in effectively understanding not just qualifications, but issues ofmanagement style, reputation, and philosophical compatibility. Ron’s complete resume isincluded behind TAB-4 in the Appendices section of this document.Alan Taylor, Senior Vice PresidentAlan Taylor retired as City Manager in Amarillo, Texas and joined SGR in the summer of 2011 asSenior Vice President. He rose through the ranks to become City Manager in Amarillo, withparticular expertise in the fields of Planning, Code Compliance and Building Inspections. Alan isan ICMA Credentialed Manager, holds a Graduate Certificate from the Public ExecutiveInstitute, and is the recipient of a Gold Addy Award for Communications Excellence from theAmerican Advertising Federation. He has also served on the Board of Directors of the TexasCity Management Association and as an International Committee Member for the InternationalCity Management Association. He holds a BA in Environmental Design and a Master of UrbanPlanning Degree, both from Texas A&M University. 8
  • Project Methodology and Work PlanOur clients come to SGR for the personalized touch and outstanding results that theycannot get from the typical mass production search firms. This proposal outlines ourmethodology and key components of the work plan for recruiting this position for you.OverviewSGR provides a comprehensive scope of executive search services, and each executivesearch service contract is tailored to meet the client’s specific needs. However, a fullservice executive search typically entails the following: Step One: Organizational Inquiry and Analysis Outline Project Plan and Timeline Individual Interviews with Search Committee and Key Personnel Development of Position Profile and Production of High Quality Brochure Search Committee Briefing One Step Two: Advertising and Recruitment Ad Placement Email Distribution of Position Profile Phone Contacts Ongoing Communication with Prospective Candidates Step Three: Initial Screening and Review Management of Resumes Technical Scoring of Resumes Search Committee Briefing Two / Selection of Quarterfinalist Candidates Step Four: Evaluation of Quarterfinalist Candidates Personal Interaction with Quarterfinalist Candidates Quarterfinalist Narrative Questionnaires Search Committee Briefing Three / Selection of Semifinalist Candidates Step Five: Evaluation of Semifinalist Candidates Personal Interaction with Semifinalist Candidates Recorded Online Interviews Search Committee Briefing Four / Selection of Finalist Candidates Step Six: Evaluation of Finalist Candidates and Interviews Comprehensive Media Reports Psychometric Assessments Assessment Center Process Conduct Interviews Deliberations Reference Checks 9
  • Comprehensive Background Screening Report Step Seven: Closing the Deal Determine the Terms of an Offer Negotiate Terms and Conditions of Employment Announcement/Press Release Transition StrategyStep 1: Organizational Inquiry and AnalysisIn the Organizational Inquiry and Analysis Stage, SGR devotes tremendous energy tounderstanding your unique culture, environment, and goals to ensure you get the rightmatch for your particular needs.Outline Project Plan and TimelineSGR will meet with the client at the outset of the project to finalize the search plans andtimeline. At this time, SGR will also request that the client provide additionalinformation about the organization and the position. Information requested will includegeneral information or available resources about the community, school district,economic vitality, political leadership, organization, strategic plan, governing body goalsand objectives, budget information, major projects, job description, salary range,benefits package, etc.Individual Interviews with Search Committee and Key PersonnelFully understanding your needs is the most critical part of conducting a successfulexecutive search. SGR conducts individual interviews with the Search Committee, keystaff, and/or direct reports to find out more about the position, special considerations,and the political environment. These interviews last approximately one hour each andidentify individual issues that may affect the dynamics of the search, as well as developa composite understanding of the client’s preferences. This process helps withorganizational buy-in and will assist us in developing the profile as we look for anysignificant staff issues or major disconnects that may not otherwise be apparent.Development of Position Profile and Professional Production of High Quality BrochureFollowing the individual interviews and internal analysis, SGR will develop a draftposition profile that is reviewed and revised in partnership with you until everyoneagrees it accurately reflects the sought-after leadership and managementcharacteristics. SGR will create a marketing piece for the position in the form of a highquality electronic (pdf) brochure. A sample brochure is located behind TAB-8 in theAppendices section of this document.Search Committee Briefing OneThe first briefing with the Search Committee is designed to report on themes or trendsidentified in the individual staff interviews and in particular to determine if there areany disconnects in perceptions or expectations regarding the roles and responsibilities 10
  • of the position. This meeting includes utilization of two different proprietaryinstruments designed to assist the Search Committee in defining and articulating thedesired attributes of the successful candidate.SGR’s goal is to zero in on the specific attributes you want and need, both tangible andintangible. SGR will evaluate the responsibilities, organizational and cultural demands,technical background, personality, and potential required. SGR will also develop a clearunderstanding of salary range, benefits, and other relevant employment expectations.Of particular importance is to identify any “litmus tests” that are absolute prerequisitesto you before starting the recruitment.Step 2: Advertising and RecruitmentThe Advertising and Recruitment stage includes distribution of the position profile,advertising the position, contacting prospective candidates, responding to inquiriesabout the position, and communicating with prospective candidates.Ad PlacementThe Project Manager and the client work together to determine the best way toadvertise and recruit for the position. Ads are typically placed in various state andnational publications, targeting the most effective venues for reaching qualifiedcandidates for that particular position.Email Distribution of Position ProfileSGR’s preferred strategy is to rely on electronic distribution of the position profilebrochure. SGR will typically send 300-500 one-at-a-time personal emails to key opinionleaders and potential prospects across the country. By utilizing an email distributionstrategy, these brochures tend to “get legs” of their own, reaching 4-5 times the numberpersonally sent out and resulting in a very high penetration rate at minimal cost.Phone ContactsSGR may have the largest private database of local government officials in the nation,with several thousand contacts on file. Ron Holifield and Alan Taylor will personally“work the phones” with approximately 100 key opinion leaders in the local governmentprofession from around the nation. Some of these calls are for the purpose of solicitinghigh potential candidates, while other calls are to encourage key opinion leaders whoknow their states/regions to share information on high potential prospects in theirprofessional circles.Ongoing Communication with Prospective CandidatesSGR communicates with all prospective candidates on a frequent and ongoing basis toensure they stay enthusiastic about the opportunity. Outstanding prospects often willnot submit a resume until they have done considerable homework on the availableposition. A significant number of inquiries will be made, and it is essential that theexecutive search firm be prepared to answer those questions with fast, accurate, and 11
  • complete information, and in a warm and personal manner. This is one of the firstplaces a prospective candidate will develop an impression about organization, and it isan area in which SGR excels. These interactions will encompass email, phone, and face-to-face correspondence.Ongoing communication with candidates typically consists of up to three personalphone calls per candidate, 4-6 email exchanges, a weekly distribution of relevant newsarticles, and 4-6 formal updates on the process by the time the conclusion is reached.The content of these communications is often responding to routine questions from thecandidates or asking the candidates questions about items that may show up in themedia about them or issues we pick up in the grapevine about them. In addition, SGRsubscribes to clipping services and provides regular news updates to all candidates oncurrent issues related to your community so that the candidates are developing adeeper understanding of your circumstances and needs even as they go through therecruitment phase. One of the reasons SGR consistently delivers a far superiorcandidate pool than any of our competitors for similar positions is the extensivecommunication we provide to our candidates during a search process.Step 3: Initial Screening and ReviewThis stage of the executive search involves managing the flow of resumes, screening andevaluating resumes, and ongoing personal interaction with prospective candidates.Once the bulk of resumes have been received, SGR will meet with the client to present acomprehensive progress report.Management of ResumesHandling the flow of resumes is an ongoing and significant process. On the front end, itinvolves tracking resumes and promptly acknowledging their receipt. It also involvestimely and personal responses to any questions or inquiries.SGR uses a triage process to identify high probability, medium probability, and lowprobability candidates. At this stage in the search, the triage process is focused onqualifications and known issues with individual candidates. This sifting process assesseshow well candidates’ applications fulfill the recruitment criteria outlined in the positionprofile.Technical Scoring of ResumesIn contrast with the initial triage process described above, which focuses on subjectiveassessment of the resumes and how the candidates present themselves, this stepinvolves very detailed analysis and scoring of the resumes of the high and mediumprobability candidates in comparison to the recruitment criteria outlined in the positionprofile. 12
  • Search Committee Briefing Two / Selection of Quarterfinalist CandidatesAt this briefing, SGR will provide a comprehensive progress report and will facilitate theselection of about 20 quarterfinalists. The presentation will include summaryinformation on the process so far, the candidate pool overall, and any trends or issuesthat have arisen, as well as a briefing on each candidate and their credentials. No otherfirm offers this level of reporting detail and transparency.Step 4: Evaluation of Quarterfinalist CandidatesReviewing resumes is an important and valuable step in the executive search process.However, the simple fact is that resumes can be misleading. They tell you nothing aboutthe individual’s personal qualities or his/her ability to get along with other people.Resumes can also exaggerate or inflate accomplishments or experience. SGR’sresponsibility is to go deeper than the resume to ensure that those candidates whocontinue in the process are truly outstanding.Personal Interaction with Quarterfinalist CandidatesSGR’s goal is to have a clear understanding of the person behind the resume and whatmakes him/her an outstanding success for you. The evaluation of quarterfinalistcandidates includes follow-up by phone when appropriate to ask any questions aboutunderlying issues, as well as preliminary background checks as needed. Based upon thenumber of candidates still in contention at this stage, phone interviews, and potentiallyeven personal interviews, may be conducted by SGR.Quarterfinalist Narrative QuestionnairesSGR will ask quarterfinalist candidates to complete a comprehensive written exercisedesigned to provide greater insight into candidate thought processes andcommunication styles. SGR’s written instrument is custom-designed around thepriorities identified by the Search Committee and usually includes about 20 questionsfocusing on 5-6 key areas of particular interest to the client. This written instrument willbe included with resumes in the briefing books prepared for each member of the SearchCommittee.Search Committee Briefing Three / Selection of Semifinalist CandidatesAt this briefing, SGR will provide a comprehensive progress report and will facilitate theselection of about 12 semifinalists.Step 5: Evaluation of Semifinalist CandidatesPersonal Interaction with Semifinalist CandidatesSGR will continue personal interaction with each of the semifinalist candidates, goingdeeper on particular issues that have been identified which warrant greater insight andunderstanding. 13
  • Recorded Online InterviewsSGR offers the option of recording short online videos of candidates answering three tofive questions. We then save the interviews to flash drives, one flash drive for eachsearch committee member. This provides a very insightful, efficient and cost effectiveway to gain additional insights to utilize in selecting finalists you want to come in for liveinterviews.Search Committee Briefing Four / Selection of Finalist CandidatesAt this briefing, SGR will provide each member of the Search Committee with a briefingbook, copies of the online interviews, present a progress report on the semifinalistcandidates, and facilitate narrowing the list to 4-6 finalists who will be invited to come infor a live interview.Step 6: Evaluation of Finalist CandidatesOnce the finalists have been selected, SGR will coordinate with you to scheduleinterviews.Comprehensive Media ReportsThe Media Reports are compiled by utilizing our proprietary media search processincluding variations of the candidates’ names and states/cities in which they have livedor worked, including searches of local papers where the candidates have lived orworked.The Media Reports can range from 20-300 pages per candidate and may include newsarticles, links to video interviews, blog posts by residents, etc. The Media Reports forthe candidates are put into an easy-to-read format and recorded onto disc’s for theSearch Committee. The candidate’s name is highlighted each time it appears.These media reports have proven helpful to Search Committees by uncovering issuesthat were not previously disclosed by prospective candidates and that would not havebeen discovered through a quick Internet search. The Media Reports also give theSearch Committee an overview of the type and extent of press coverage that acandidate has experienced over the course of his/her career.Psychometric AssessmentsIt is critical for you to know as much as you can about your new executive before hiringhim/her. Historically, employers have depended upon resumes, references, andinterviews as sources of information for making hiring decisions. In practice, thesesources have proved inadequate for consistently selecting successful employees. Theuse of assessments has become essential for employers who want to place the rightpeople in the right positions. SGR uses DiSC profile assessment tools, which are amongthe most validated and reliable personal assessment tools available. 14
  • SGR will ask semifinalists to complete two DiSC profile assessments. The DiSCDimensions of Behavior explore behavioral issues across four primary dimensions:Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness. This allows deeperunderstanding about individual behavioral characteristics than is possible in a traditionalinterview.The DiSC Behavioral Profile, combined with the DiSC Management Profile, provides ameaningful psychometric analysis of the semifinalists. The personal behavioral profileexamines basic personality attributes using the DiSC typology. The feedback covers abroad range of behavioral characteristics, including behavioral strengths andweaknesses, motivating and de-motivating factors, and management and selling styles.The DiSC Management Profile analyzes and reports comprehensively on the candidate’spreferences in five vital areas: management style, directing and delegating, motivation,development of others, and working with his/her own manager.The psychometric assessment tools provide additional information about candidates toassist in determining which qualified candidate is the best match for your organization.Samples of the two assessment reports are included in the Appendices section of thisdocument behind TAB-9.Assessment Center ProcessSGR provides an assessment center process, a two week time period during whichcandidates may visit the city and talk to key employees and/or council members in orderto develop a first year plan. The finalist candidates present their first year plans to thesearch committee during the onsite interview. This process provides a more in-depthanalysis of the way the finalist candidates approach problem solving and will allow thesearch committee to have a sense of what you can expect of the candidate duringhis/her first year on the job.Conduct InterviewsSGR will schedule interviews at a date/time convenient to the client. This process canbe as simple, or as complex, as the client desires. SGR will help you determine thespecifics you need. SGR will prepare sample questions for each candidate and willparticipate throughout the process to make it smooth and efficient.DeliberationsAt this meeting, SGR will facilitate a discussion about the finalist interviews and assistthe Search Committee in making a decision on whether to bring back one or morecandidates for a second interview.Reference ChecksOur reference checks are the most comprehensive in the industry. We place very littleconfidence on the references provided by the candidates since those can be expected tobe biased. Instead, we will typically talk to as many as 20 professional contacts for agiven candidate including elected officials, direct supervisors, direct reports, internal 15
  • organizational peers, professional peers in other organizations, civic leaders, and mediarepresentatives. We always seek out the candidate’s greatest critics and greatest fansto ensure a complete, yet balanced, perspective and overview of each candidate.Comprehensive Background Investigation ReportThrough SGR’s partnership with First Check, a licensed private investigations company,we are able to provide our clients with comprehensive background screening reportsthat include detailed information such as:  Social Security number trace  Address history  Driving history/motor vehicle records  Credit report  Federal criminal search  National criminal search  Nationwide wants and warrants  Global homeland security search  Sex offender registry search  State criminal search (for current and previous states of residence)  County criminal search (for every county in which candidate has lived or worked)  County civil search (for every county in which the candidate has lived or worked)A sample Background Screening Report is available behind TAB-10 in the Appendicessection of this document.Step 7: Closing the DealOnce the final candidate has been selected, SGR can provide additional assistance to theclient in the following areas.Determine the Terms of an OfferUpon request, SGR will provide comparative data for selected organizations,appropriate employment agreement language, and other similar information to assistyou in determining an appropriate offer to extend to your candidate of choice.Negotiate Terms and Conditions of EmploymentSGR will assist to whatever degree you deem appropriate in conducting negotiationswith the chosen candidate. SGR determine and define any special needs or concerns ofthe chosen candidate, including anything that could be a complicating factor. SGR isexperienced and prepared to help craft win-win-solutions to negotiation “log-jams.” 16
  • Announcement/Press ReleaseUntil you have “sealed the deal,” you need to be cautious in order to avoid theembarrassment of a premature announcement that does not work out. You also wantto try and notify all senior staff and unsuccessful candidates before they read about it inthe newspaper. SGR will assist with this coordination and with drafting anyannouncements or press releases.Transition StrategyThere are a variety of transition issues when hiring a new executive. SGR will brief theclient on transition issues that need to be addressed and will provide a recommendationon what actions to take. Together, we will create a transition strategy that builds thefoundation for a successful long-term relationship. 17
  • Approximate 16 Week TimelineTask WeeksContract Executed / Outline Project Plan and Timeline Week 1Individual Interviews with Key Players Week 1Develop Position Profile Brochure & Search Committee Briefing 1 Weeks 2-4Ad Placements / Accept Applications Weeks 4-9Search Committee Briefing 2: Select Quarterfinalist Candidates Week 9Deliverable 1: Quarterfinalist Briefing Books with Completed Pre- Week 10Interview QuestionnairesSearch Committee Briefing 3: Select Semifinalist Candidates Week 11Deliverable 2: Semifinalist Briefing Books with Recorded Online Week 12Interviews on Flash DrivesSearch Committee Briefing 4: Select Finalist Candidates Week 13Deliverable 3: Finalist Briefing Books with Media Reports and Week 14Psychometric Assessment ReportsConduct Interviews Week 15Deliberations Week 15Briefing on Comprehensive Background Screening Report and Week 16Reference Checks for Top CandidateNegotiate Terms and Conditions of Employment Week 16Announcement/Press Release and Transition Strategy Week 16 Total Duration of Search: 16 Weeks* Each search timeline is different based on the particular needs of each organization. SGR hascompleted searches in as little as 45 days, although this is not the recommended approach. 18
  • Project CostAll-Inclusive Maximum PriceProfessional Services Fee $ 17,500Expenses Not-to-Exceed: $ 4,500All-Inclusive, Not-to-Exceed Maximum Price: $ 22,000 *Expense Items (Included in Not-to-Exceed Price Above)SGR considers incidentals to be covered by the professional services fee, and we do notbill the client for any expenses except for those explicitly detailed herein.Expense items include:  Professional production of a high quality brochure. This brochure (typically four pages) is produced by SGR’s graphic designer for a flat fee of $300 per page.  Ad placement in appropriate professional publications, including trade journals and websites, and related advertising to announce the position. This is billed at actual cost, with no markup for overhead.  Printing of documents and materials. Reproduction costs for reports and briefing books presented to the client at 21 cents per page per copy, plus the cost of binders/binding. Electronic discs are billed at $5 each. Flash drives are billed at $10 each.  Online interviews. There is an additional cost of $100 for each recorded online interview. SGR recommends conducting online interviews at the semifinalist stage.  Psychometric Assessments. There is an additional cost of $150 per candidate for each of the psychometric analysis instruments. SGR recommends utilizing the DiSC PPSS Profile and the DiSC Management Profiles at the finalist stage.  Comprehensive Media Reports. There is an additional cost of $350 per candidate for whom a report is prepared. SGR recommends conducting comprehensive media searches on the finalist candidates.  Comprehensive Background Investigation Report. There is a cost of $300 per candidate for comprehensive background screening reports prepared by our licensed private investigations provider. SGR recommends conducting a comprehensive investigation on the top candidate.  Travel and related costs for the Project Manager incurred for the benefit of the client. Meals are billed back at $10 for breakfast, $15 for lunch, and $20 for dinner. Hotels are billed at a $150 per night per diem. Mileage will be reimbursed at the current IRS rate. All other travel-related expenses are billed back at actual cost, with no markup for overhead. 19
  • * Optional ServicesThe optional services listed below are not included in the maximum price above. Theseinclude:  Candidate Travel. Candidates are typically reimbursed directly by the client for travel expenses. If the client prefers a different arrangement for candidate travel, SGR will be glad to accommodate the client’s wishes.  Site Visits to Communities of Finalist Candidates. If desired, the Project Manager will travel to the communities of the finalist candidates to conduct onsite visits. Site visits will be charged at a day rate of $1,000 per day, plus travel expenses.  In the unexpected event the client shall request that unusual out of pocket expenses be incurred, said expenses will be reimbursed at the actual cost with no mark up for overhead.  If the client desires any supplemental services not mentioned in this section, an estimate of the cost and hours to be committed will be provided at that time, and no work shall be done without approval. Supplemental services will be billed out at $250 per hour.BillingProfessional fees for the search are billed in three equal installments during the courseof the search. The initial installment is billed after the Organizational Inquiry andAnalysis is completed and the position profile has been created. The second installmentis billed when semifinalists are selected. The final installment is billed at the conclusionof the search. Expense (reimbursable) items and supplemental services will be billedwith each of the three installments, as appropriate. 20
  • Provision of Service GuaranteeSGR guarantees that you will be satisfied with the results of the search process, or wewill repeat the entire process at no additional cost until you find a candidate that youdesire. Additionally, if you select a candidate who resigns or is released within 24months of their hire date, SGR will repeat the process at no cost to the client. We alsoguarantee that we will not solicit a candidate we bring to you for another job for at leastfive years. 21
  • Ronald Mack Holifield Resume – January 2012 Strategic Government Resources, P.O. Box 1642, Keller, Texas 76248 Cell: 214-676-1691, Ron@GovernmentResource.comPROFESSIONAL HISTORYStrategic Government Resources – Owner & CEOJanuary 1999 to Present  Owner and CEO of this strategic management firm, specializing in helping local governments recruit, select and develop exceptional executives and governing body members, as well as developing various innovative public-private partnerships.  Clients have included over 200 local governments, as well as NASA, TXU, Oncor Utility Solutions, Accountability International, ViON, Storage Tek, SportsCenter, Energy Technology Group, Options Real Estate, BSW Chambers of Commerce, HVJ Engineers, Pro Players Foundation, Springbrook Software and others.  SGR is now the largest in the nation with almost 200 member cities in Texas, Oklahoma, and Virginia. SGR currently trains over 1,000 local government employees each month and also provides online training in 11 states.  Interviewed and/or quoted by various news publications and media outlets on issues related to local government including: National Public Radio, Entrepreneur Magazine, American Express Small Business, Texas City Manager Magazine, Texas Town and City, Government Technology Magazine, GovWire Online Magazine, Federal Computer Week Magazine, CIO Magazine, Dallas Morning News, Dallas Business Journal, Plano Star Courier, DFW Tech Biz, Today Newspapers, Focus on the News, D Magazine, International Association of Chiefs of Police Journal, WOAI TV and KRLD and KTET Radio, as well as local news stations in numerous markets.Government Relations Specialists – Owner & CEOAugust 1996 to September 2001  Owner and CEO of this 20 year old governmental consulting firm, specializing in representing businesses doing business with government and in legislative advocacy efforts.  Doubled in size, becoming the 49th largest lobby firm in Texas, after which it was sold to an employee to allow the launch of Strategic Government Resources.  Major clients included American Express, Aramark, Automated Licensing Systems, Childrens Comprehensive Services, Executone, IBM, Quorum Health Group, Library Systems and Services, PeopleSoft, SCT, Space Imaging, TXI, Verizon, Waste Management of North America, and Xerox.
  • Ronald Mack Holifield Page 2 of 8City of DeSoto, Texas – City ManagerOctober 1994 to August 1996  City Manager of this highly diverse suburban community, located 20 minutes south of downtown Dallas.  Hired to lead a rapid cultural change at City Hall, with a specific challenge to transform the organization from one known for being highly bureaucratic, stagnant, and ineffective in economic development, into one known for being aggressively customer service driven, highly successful in the economic development arena, and operating in a very cost effective manner.  Significant accomplishments in Economic Development: - Named by Texas Business Magazine as one of the top 20 Texas cities to relocate a business. Evaluations were based upon pro-business environment, cost of doing business, infrastructure and city services, crime, and quality of life. - Named by Texas Business Magazine as one of the “Best Run Cities in Texas.” Evaluations were based upon the strength of upper management, fiscal responsibility, staff diversity, vision, and quality of services delivered. - Later, Texas Outlook Magazine named DeSoto as one of the top 25 Texas cities for economic development.  Other significant achievements: - Dramatic improvements in all financial operating systems. - Complete overhaul of the city’s personnel systems. - Implementation of the city’s first comprehensive long range capital improvements program. - Substantial increases in the city’s fund balances. - Increase in commercial building permits in excess of 1,000% over the previous year. - Attainment of the lowest crime rate of any major city in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex.City of Garland, Texas – City ManagerNovember 1991 to June 1994  City Manager of this rapidly growing city, which owns and operates an electric production and distribution system, a regional wastewater treatment system, a regional landfill, and a heliport, and offers a variety of social services and strong cultural arts. The ninth largest city in Texas, Garland’s population was in excess of 220,000 with over 2,300 employees, and an annual operating and capital budget in excess of $350 million.  Hired in 1991 to take this very traditional manufacturing-based community and rapidly position it as a statewide leader, transforming its one-dimensional image and reputation as a blue-collar suburb into that of a leading first tier city.
  • Ronald Mack Holifield Page 3 of 8  Specific City Council goals established and achieved during my tenure include: - Financial Management – Strengthen the financial position of the City, and overhaul the City’s financial and budgetary systems to make them more accountable and understandable; make Garland’s cost of services more competitive with area cities; minimize dependence on debt; and, operate City utilities as if they were private enterprises. - Economic Development – Reinvigorate the City’s economic development program, positioning Garland as the statewide leader in demonstrating that strong environmental policies and strong economic growth efforts are compatible; and enhance citywide housing and neighborhood standards. - Quality of Life – Provide Garland with a national profile in the Arts; dramatically improve Garland’s commitment to basic infrastructure repair and replacement; make Garland the safest city in the Metroplex; and, revitalize downtown. - Organizational Excellence – Establish an organization whose diversity reflects the community; establish routine evaluation of privatization alternatives; introduce benchmarking as the basis for effective performance measurement; dramatically improve citizen communication and trust in the integrity of local government; create an innovation-minded organization, known for a results-orientation, and capable of overcoming traditional bureaucratic mind-sets and obstacles.City of Plano, Texas – Assistant City Manager, Assistant to the City ManagerNovember 1986 to November 1991  Served in a variety of capacities in this rapidly growing, premier city, including: Assistant City Manager of Community Services, Assistant City Manager of Administration, Acting Assistant City Manager for Development, and Assistant to the City Manager.  Significant accomplishments while with Plano include: - Designed an Affirmative Action Program that doubled mid- and upper-level management representation in four years while maintaining a “best-qualified” standard. - Designed a Disadvantaged Business Purchasing Program that dramatically increased minority business contracts without quotas. - Served as Project Manager for a $19.5 million Civic Center Project, bringing it in $2 million under budget. - Assisted in negotiating details of the JC Penney headquarters relocation from New York City to Plano. - Created Plano’s first Convention/Visitor’s Bureau, becoming a highly effective city department that exceeded year six sales and bookings projections in the first year. - Initiated Plano’s first Neighborhood Integrity Program, protecting neighborhood stability. - Achieved a $750,000 sales tax windfall for the city by creatively designing construction contracts for two large economic development projects (EDS and JC Penney).
  • Ronald Mack Holifield Page 4 of 8 - Designed an Employee Wellness Program which resulted in participant health care costs equaling only one-third those of non-participants.City of Farmersville, Texas – City ManagerMay 1984 to November 1986  First City Manager of this full service city, which operates an electric distribution system and two city lakes.  Major achievements were in the areas of growth management, infrastructure improvements and municipal finance.City of Sundown, Texas – City ManagerMay 1982 to May 1984  City Manager of this full service city, which operates a natural gas distribution system and a municipal golf course.  Major achievements were in the areas of economic development, public/private partnerships, infrastructure improvements, and municipal finance.City of Lubbock, Texas – City Administrative Intern to the City ManagerJanuary 1981 to May 1982  Administrative Intern to the City Manager of this major city, which operates a municipally owned electric utility.  Primary accomplishments were in the area of performance measurement.EDUCATION  Texas Tech University – Masters of Public Administration  Abilene Christian University – Bachelor of Arts, Government Major / Student Association PresidentMAJOR MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT AWARDS for Organizations Managed  Named “One of the Ten Best Managed Cities In Texas” by Texas Business Magazine, 1995  Named “One of the Top 20 Cities to Relocate Your Business to” by Texas Business Magazine, 1995  Named “One of the Top 25 Cities for Economic Development” by Texas Outlook Magazine, 1996
  • Ronald Mack Holifield Page 5 of 8  3CMA Economic Development Marketing Campaign Savvy Award Certificate of Excellence for International Development and Local Realtor Ads, 1994  International Association of Chiefs of Police, Excellence in Policing Award for Neighborhood Service Team, 1994  Finalist, Governor’s Environmental Excellence Award, 1994  Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Award for Excellence, 1993  American Society of Landscape Architects, Texas Chapter, Environmental Stewardship Award for Garland’s Spring Creek Forest Preserve, 1993  Dallas Business Journal, “Metroplex Real Estate Deal of the Year (Existing Building),”1992  GFOA Award for Distinguished Budget Presentation, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996  GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996PROFESSIONAL PARTICIPATION  Author, “Fourth Dimension Leadership”, 2010  Author of a Monthly Column in Texas City Manager Magazine on “Innovations that Make a Difference”, 1999-2003  Member, International City/County Management Association (ICMA), 1982-present  Member, Texas City Management Association (TCMA), 1982-present  ICMA Task Force on Employment Agreements, 2001-2003  ICMA Management Innovations Panel, 1999-2000  ICMA Conference Evaluation Committee, 1999  ICMA/Innovation Groups National Management Practices Panel, 1995-1996  Author, “The Public Executive’s Complete Guide to Employment Agreements”, book published by ICMA and the Innovation Groups, 1996  Texas Innovation Groups Executive Committee, 1992-1996  Author, “Crossing Department Lines – Garland’s Neighborhood Service Team”, article published in the International Association of Chiefs of Police National Journal, 1994  Author, “Redefining Thinking, Structures and the Rules of the Game in Government”, article published in Texas Town and City Magazine, 1993  Contributor, State Comptroller Bob Bullock’s handbook for municipalities: “Standard Financial Management System for Texas Cities”,  Texas Municipal League Advisory Committee on Legislative Affairs – Personnel Issues,  TCMA Ethics and Professional Standards Committee,  TCMA Annual Conference Committee,
  • Ronald Mack Holifield Page 6 of 8SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS  National Parks and Recreation Association Annual Conference, 4th Dimension Leadership, 2011  Texas Municipal Human Resources Association Annual Nuts and Bolts Conference – Effective Hiring Practices, 2011  WMI Annual Employee Conference – Thriving in the New Normal, 2011  Northwest States City Management Association Annual Conference – The Changing World of Ethics, 2011  Ohio City Manager’s Association, Annual Conference – 4th Dimension Leadership, 2011  Oklahoma City Manager’s Association Annual Conference – The Changing World of Ethics, 2011  Law Enforcement Management Institute of Texas – Strategic Budgeting, 2011  Law Enforcement Command College – Strategic Budgeting, 2011  Texas City Management Association Annual Conference – Creating an Effective Employee Development Program, 2010  Public Risk Management Association Annual Conference – Employee Health Clinics, 2010  Texas Recreation and Parks Association Annual Conference – 4th Dimension Leadership, 2010  North Texas Purchasing Association Annual Conference – Effective Collaboration, 2010  Law Enforcement Management Institute of Texas – Strategic Budgeting, 2010  Law Enforcement Command College – Strategic Budgeting, 2010  West Texas City Management Association Annual Training Conference – Effective Collaboration Across Organizational Lines, 2009  Texas Municipal League Regional Meeting – Keys to Successful Collaboration, 2009  Texas Municipal Human Resources Association Annual Nuts and Bolts Conference – Effective Hiring Practices, 2009  Law Enforcement Management Institute of Texas – Strategic Budgeting, 2009  Law Enforcement Command College – Strategic Budgeting, 2009  East Texas City Management Association Annual Training Conference – Effective Collaboration Across Organizational Lines, 2008  East Texas City Management Association Annual Training Conference – Understanding and Managing Generational Differences, 2007  International City/County Management Association Annual Conference – The Role of Faith Based Organizations in Disaster Planning, 2006  Certified Public Manager Program – Achieving Exceptional Customer Service, 1995-2005  North Texas Municipal Association Management Institute – Tools for Effective Leadership, 2006  City of Carrollton, Texas, Leadership Academy – Principles of Public Service, 2006  City of Arlington, Texas, Leadership Academy – Developing Your People, 2005  Keynote Speaker, Urban Management Assistants of North Texas Annual One Day Conference – Innovative Revenue Sources for Cities, 2005
  • Ronald Mack Holifield Page 7 of 8  Leadership Southwest - How to Successfully Run for Office, 2004, 2006, 2008  International City/County Management Association Annual Conference – Contract Negotiations, 2003  Keynote Speaker (along with the Deputy Secretary of Defense), Government Electronics and Information Technology Association Information Technology and Defense Electronics Forecast Annual Conference – Homeland Security at the State and Local Level, 2002  Transforming Local Government Conference – Doing Business with Local Government, 2001  National Association of Counties Annual Conference – Doing Business with County Government, 1999  World Services Congress – Building Public Private Partnerships, 1999  Central Texas City Management Association – Contract Negotiations, 1999  Carolinas-Virginia Hospital Trustee/Physician Conference – Effective Government Relations, 1999  Quorum Ohio CEO Conference – Effective Government Relations, 1999  Chairman of the Board In-Service Training, Quorum – Effective Government Relations, 1999  Quorum Foundations for the Future – Effective Grass Roots Advocacy, 1999  Quorum Chairman of the Board Training – Advocacy Leadership, 1998  Iowa Municipal Management Institute – Entrepreneurial Government, 1997  Quorum Foundations for the Future – Effective Legislative Advocacy, 1997  Quorum Board of Trustees Training – Legislative Leadership, 1997  Urban Management Assistants of North Texas, Conference of Minority Public Administrators, and National Forum for Black Public Administrators Joint Workshop – Organizational Transformation, 1996  Innovation Groups Regional Conference – Contract Negotiations, 1996  Texas City Management Association Annual Conference – Employment Agreements, 1996  Florida City/County Management Association Annual Conference – Employment Agreements, 1996  North Carolina City/County Management Association Annual Conference – Employment Agreements, 1996  Quorum Foundations for the Future – Effective Grass Roots Lobbying, 1996  International City/County Management Association Conference – Employment Agreements, 1996  Texas City Management Association Conference – Serving Changing Councils, 1995  Kansas Innovation Groups Regional Workshop – Beyond Community Policing, City- County Communications & Marketing Association National Conference – Marketing Your City, 1995  National League of Cities Innovations in Government National Conference – Cluster Management and Neighborhood Service Team Concepts, 1994  Innovation Groups Regional Workshop – Making Your City More Productive, 1993
  • Ronald Mack Holifield Page 8 of 8  Texas Foundation for the Improvement of Local Government Institute – Entrepreneurial Government, 1993  Session Facilitator, ICMA Annual Conference, on "Evaluating the Performance of the City Manager", 1998OTHER HONORS AND ACTIVITIES  American MENSA member  Distinguished Alumni, Abilene Christian University, 1999  Abilene Christian University Public Administration Visiting Committee, 1992-1998  Texas Tech University, Center for Public Service, Alumni of the Year
  • ALAN M. TAYLOR 216 Apache Mountain Lane Georgetown, Texas 78633 512-943-9607 (home) (806) 678-3758 (cell) alantaylor.gtx@gmail.com BACKGROUND INFORMATIONI am a recently retired City Manager / Professional Public Executive with approximately 34 yearsof proven and highly responsible Texas local government and municipal operations experience.With my extensive local government service experience and associated education andprofessional training, I specialize in executive and staff recruitment services, administrativeleadership mentoring and problem solving, employee training, organizational planning anddevelopment and other direct professional consulting services for Texas municipal and otherlocal government organizations.PROFESSIONAL HISTORYJuly 2010 – PresentSENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, EXECUTIVE SEARCH SPECIALIZING IN CITY MANAGEMENTSGR conducts more Texas city manager searches than any other firm, and is the largest localgovernment training firm in the nation, training over 1,000 city employees per month forapproximately 200 local government clients. SGR Online Learning has municipal clients in 11states. I am the Senior Vice President who specializes in conducting city manager executivesearches for SGR.June 2004 to June 2010CITY MANAGER - City of Amarillo, Texas (Population of 194,000 people and having a 102.39square mile corporate area located in Potter and Randall Counties)I had the privilege to serve as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) responsible for theadministration and daily operation of the City of Amarillo, a home rule municipality operatedunder the Council / Manager form of government. As City Manager, I administered annualorganizational budgets of up to $ 336 million dollars, through eight operating Divisions andforty-seven Departments having a total workforce of approximately 2200 employees.My past duties as City Manager may be summarized by the following primary areas of municipaladministration:Administrative Management – Directed the daily administration and management of theAmarillo municipal organization under the policy direction of the Amarillo City Commission. Fullresponsibility for administrative oversight of all operations, services and programs of the Citythrough the administration and enforcement of City Ordinances, Resolutions, codes, policies andprocedures; Directed organizational short and long range policy formulation, financial andcapital improvement planning, implementation and project management; purchasing andprocurement of equipment, goods and services; Human Resources operations and staff Alan M. Taylor--Resume
  • development and retention; Ensured the continual provision of effective, courteous and pro-active customer service assistance and public complaint resolution; Acted as the primary liaisonbetween the City Commission and all City Boards and Commissions; and guided the dailypersonnel leadership and associated supervision of Division Directors, Department Heads andCity employees;Financial Administration – Directed the preparation, review and oversight of short term, annualand long range budgets, capital improvements, investments, pension activities and otherfinancial operational needs through coordination and oversight of Divisions and Departments;Provided and ensured the daily interactive management and oversight of all financial,accounting, purchasing, human resources and management information systems service andprogram functions of the City;Public / Intergovernmental Relations - Ensured the general public, business community andother governmental entities were properly and effectively informed of matters related to theaffairs, operations, services and programs of the City; Directed and maintained helpful, openand prompt communications with the public and the local news media thereby enhancingeffective public relations and a positive, customer service oriented image of municipalgovernment; Served as the primary City liaison to other governmental entities; andEconomic Development / Tourism – Served as Co-Director of a City and Amarillo EconomicDevelopment Corporation ( AEDC ) team which promoted the development, expansion andretention of local business and industry. This role included an active involvement in thesolicitation, recruitment and deal negotiation for all Amarillo economic development prospectsand projects. Also was responsible for the administrative oversight of the operations andactivities of the Amarillo Convention and Visitors Council (CVC), which was operated underannual contract funding from the City.October 1987 to June 2004ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER – City of Amarillo, TexasI served as the sole Assistant City Manager for the City of Amarillo municipal organization. Inthis position, I was the Chief Operating Officer (COO) of the City under the direction of the CityManager and the Amarillo City Commission. During my long tenure in this position, I wasauthorized by the City Commission with complete and absolute authority to execute all legal,contractual, financial and other requirements associated with the ongoing operations of theCity. I automatically assumed the full responsibilities of the City Manager during all absencesfrom work and the community by the incumbent.November 1983 to September 1987ADMINISTRATOR / BUILDING OFFICIAL, Code Enforcement Department, City of Amarillo,Texas;I was the Manager of a line operations Department with average annual operating budget ofover $ 2.5 million dollars. The Department was separated into two operating divisions: BuildingServices and Neighborhood Services.The Building Services Division consisted of code review and analysis, licensing, permitting and Alan M. Taylor--Resume
  • field inspection of all building, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical and all other constructionand public works related activities within the City. During my administrative tenure, over $ 520million dollars in construction activity was regulated, including the issuance of 38,000 permitsand the performance of approximately 165,000 field inspections.The Neighborhood Services Division consisted of offense, nuisance, zoning, housing, sign andalcoholic beverage enforcement and associated licensing and permitting. The division alsoperformed substandard structure abatement, weed control, junk and debris removal and junkedvehicle abatement programs. During my administrative tenure, this division processed 20,200occupational licenses and permits and performed over 68,300 field inspections.I was responsible for all Department activities through a staff of 28 full-time employees and 15private contractors associated with weed control, junk and debris removal and junked vehicleprograms. I also served as an Ex-Officio member and Administrator of the Amarillo ZoningBoard of Adjustment, Building Board of Appeals, Fire Code Board of Appeals, Board of ElectricalExaminers, Plumbing Advisory and Appeals Board, Heating and Air Conditioning Advisory andAppeals Board and the Mayors Advisory Commission for the Disabled.December 1977 to October 1983CITY PLANNER II, Planning Department, City of Amarillo, Texas;I was the Deputy Department Head and daily operations administrator of the PlanningDepartment, which was responsible for all zoning; subdivision development review and platting;annexations; urban planning and design; land and specialized neighborhood planning; propertydedications and vacations; City property sales and purchases; License and Hold HarmlessAgreements; Federal Flood Hazard Regulation; Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation; andComprehensive Planning for the Amarillo corporate and M.S.A. area.The Department also functioned as the primary research and analysis staff for the AmarilloMayor and City Commission, City Manager and other City Departments. Research and analysiswhich I directed and also performed included capital improvements programming; departmentaloperations analysis; statistical research analysis; and miscellaneous projects including campusplanning for local college and schools; fire station and library location studies; economic andindustrial development forecasting; enterprise fund rate studies; Federal Revenue Sharing andBlock Grant fund budgeting and programming and municipal computer systems and services.In this position, I was responsible for all daily operations for this Department having 12 full-time employees. I also served as an Ex-Officio member and the Administrator of the AmarilloPlanning and Zoning Commission and the Board of Appraisal Review.January 1977 to November 1977ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN, Fayette County (LaGrange) Texas, Pilot County Administration,Planning and Resource ProgramGraduate School Internship in which I served as the Director of a pilot program sponsored andfunded by the Texas Department of Community Affairs, the Capital Area Planning Council ofGovernments (CAPCOG) and Texas A & M University to determine and evaluate effective futurepolicies and procedures for the possible creation of administrative management, planning and Alan M. Taylor--Resume
  • resource development programs for Texas counties. This specialized program effort wasdirectly commissioned by the Texas Legislature related to its consideration and evaluation oflegislative bills then filed for the adoption and enactment of county ordinance-making powers.The administration of this program required the development of extensive inter-governmentalcooperation and strong working relationships with State officers and local officials in eachFayette county municipality, including the creation of an active citizen participation program toadvise the Fayette County Judge and Commissioners Court.September 1976 to December 1976PROJECT DIRECTOR, Capital Area Planning Council of Governments (CAPCO), Austin, Texas,North Sector StudyProject Director / Manager of a 5-member Texas A & M University graduate student consultantteam on the CAPCO Phase II, III and IV North Sector Study, which was a comprehensiveplanning and future economic development and management plan for Northern Travis andSouthern Williamson Counties, Texas. The Cities of Austin, Round Rock, Georgetown, CedarPark, Leander and Liberty Hill did adopt this plan study in 1977 and the associated urbanplanning and economic development goals and growth policy directives. This project requiredextensive interaction with each of the City Councils and Planning and Zoning Commissions inthe two county study areas.June 1976 to September 1976PROJECT DIRECTOR, City of College Station, Texas Comprehensive Plan UpdateProject Director / Manager of a 10-member Texas A & M University graduate student consultantteam commissioned to perform an update of the then existing College Station ComprehensivePlan. This Comprehensive Plan Update was subsequently adopted by the College StationPlanning and Zoning Commission and City Council and implemented for its future Citydevelopment policies and procedures.EDUCATION, CERTIFICATIONS AND HONORSMaster of Urban Planning Degree, Texas A & M University, 1977Bachelor of Environmental Design Degree, Texas A & M University, 1976Tau Sigma Delta, National Honor Society Inductee, Texas A & M University, 1975Graduate, Conroe High School, Conroe, Texas, 1972All-State, All-Region Honors Awards Recipient, Conroe High School, Conroe, Texas, 1971, 1972ICMA Credentialed Manager, International City-County Management Association, 2003 through2010 Alan M. Taylor--Resume
  • Graduate Certificate, Public Executive Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Lyndon B.Johnson School of Public Affairs, 1991Recipient of 2010 Gold ADDY Award for Public Communications Excellence, from the AmericanAdvertising Federation, Amarillo, Texas ChapterPROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIESTexas City Management Association, Life MemberBoard of Directors, Texas City Management Association 1991-1993Budget Committee Member, Texas City Management Association 1992-1993Annual Conference Committee, Vice Chairman, Texas City Management Association 1992-1993Ethics Committee Member, Texas City Management Association 1988-1990, 1994-1997Public Policy Committee Member, Texas City Management Association 1990-1991Membership/Public Relations Committee Member, Texas City Management Association 1999-2000Mentoring and In-Transition Committee Member, Texas City Management Association 2003-2006Texas Panhandle City Managers Association, Life MemberPresident, Texas Panhandle City Managers Association 1990-1991Vice President, Texas Panhandle City Managers Association 1989-1990International City / County Management Association, Full Retired MemberInternational Committee Member, International City / County Management Association 1992-1993United Way of Amarillo, Former Four (4) Term Member of the Board of DirectorsAmarillo Intergovernmental Relations and Legislative Committee, Former MemberAmarillo Downtown Development Committee, Former MemberAmarillo Population Technical Committee, Former Chairman and MemberAmarillo Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Former Chairman and MemberAmarillo Area Joint Terrorism Response Group, Former Chairman Alan M. Taylor--Resume
  • Client List (includes full and component based search assistance)  Amarillo, TX City Manager Assistant City Manager* Aviation Director* Building Official* City Attorney* City Engineer* Civic Center Manager* Clinic Administrator* Community Services Director* Emergency Communications Center Director* Emergency Management Director* Facilities Manager* Finance Director* Fire Chief* Golf Professional* Human Resources Director* Information Technology Director* Library Director* Medical Doctor* Municipal Court Judge* Planning Director* Parks and Recreation Director Police Chief* Public Works Director* Public Health Director* Purchasing Director* Risk Manager* Transit Manager* Utilities Director* Utilities Assistant Director*  Austin, TX Public Works Director*  Argyle, TX City Manager  Arlington, TX Public Works Assistant Director Water Assistant Director*
  • SGR Client List, Page 2 of 6 Atlanta, TX City Manager Breckenridge, TX City Manager Burkburnett, TX City Manager Cedar Hill, TX New Urbanist Cedar Park, TX Assistant City Manager Emergency Medical Coordinator Cleveland, TX City Manager College Station, TX City Manager Colleyville, TX City Manager Police Chief Colo. River Muni Water Dist Assistant General Manager Director of Planning and Engineering Commerce, TX City Manager Copper Canyon, TX City Manager Corpus Christi, TX Director of Finance Denison, TX City Manager Police Chief Director of Finance Denton, TX City Manager Information Services Director* DeSoto, TX City Manager * Assistant City Manager * Economic Development Council CEO * Director of Finance * Director of Administrative Services * Fire Chief * Duncanville, TX City Manager Elk City, OK City Manager
  • SGR Client List, Page 3 of 6 El Paso, TX Deputy City Manager for Mobility Services* Planning and Economic Development Director* Farmersville, TX City Manager Police Chief* Forney, TX Assistant City Manager Development Services Director Director of Community Development Freeport, TX Fire Chief Police Chief Gainesville, TX City Manager Garland, TX Deputy City Manager * Assistant City Manager * Budget Director* City Secretary* Code Enforcement Director* Finance Director* Fire Chief * Human Resources Director* Operations Analysis Manager* Police Chief * Special Events Director * Gonzales, TX City Manager Grand Prairie, TX Chief of Police Grapevine, TX Director of Finance Greenville, TX City Manager Fire Chief Police Chief Hewitt, TX City Manager HJV Associates Business Developer Hot Springs, AR City Manager
  • SGR Client List, Page 4 of 6 Hudson Oaks, TX City Administrator Keller, TX City Manager Kilgore, TX City Manager Kyle, TX City Manager Chief of Police Lancaster, TX City Manager Acting City Manager Assistant City Manager Building Official Economic Development Director Finance Director Recreation Superintendent League City, TX Fire Chief Longview, TX City Engineer Fire Chief Lorena, TX City Manager Lufkin, TX CVB Executive Director Fire Chief Library Director Memphis, TN Economic Development Director* Midland, TX Assistant City Manager Fire Chief Midlothian, TX Economic Development Executive Director Mustang, OK City Manager North Port, FL Economic Development Manager* N. Texas Tollway Authority Executive Director* Palestine, TX Fire Chief Interim Finance Director Paris, TX City Manager
  • SGR Client List, Page 5 of 6 Pflugerville, TX Economic Development Director Pearland, TX Fire Chief EMS Director Plano, TX CVB Director* Economic Development Director* Facilities Manager* Finance Director* Fleet Equipment Services Manager Human Resources Director * Purchasing Director * Personnel Manager * Prosper, TX City Manager Acting City Manager Red Oak, TX Economic Development Director Police Chief Richland, WA Police Chief Richland Hills, TX Fire Chief Richardson, TX Assistant City Manager* Rowlett, TX City Manager Public Works Director Economic Development Director Royse City, TX City Manager Sachse, TX City Manager Seabrook, TX Community Development Director Seagoville, TX City Secretary Human Resources Director Police Chief Southlake, TX Police Chief Sundown, TX City Manager *
  • SGR Client List, Page 6 of 6 Golf Professional * Police Chief *  Terrell, TX Assistant City Manager Police Chief  TX Water Devlpmt Board Deputy Exec Administrator – Fin. and Construct.* General Counsel*  Tomball, TX Police Chief  Van Alstyne, TX City Manager  Victoria, TX Fire Chief Police Chief  Virginia Beach, VA Planning and Community Development Director*  Weatherford, TX Assistant City Manager Assistant Fire Chief City Secretary Community Relations Manager Development Services Director Finance Director Police Chief  Westlake, TX City Manager  WMI Public Sector Marketing Manager Municipal Service Representative  Yoakum, TX City ManagerAll items marked with an asterisk (*) indicate that the search was conducted by one of SGR’s currentrecruiters while they were with a previous firm, or while they were still in public service.
  • References *Below is a list of references to allow evaluation of our track record from a variety ofperspectives. We have included clients as well as successful and unsuccessfulcandidates in the reference list.We believe our long-term success dictates we treat every candidate with honesty andrespect, while communicating frequently and meaningfully. How we deal withcandidates, both successful and unsuccessful, has helped build our incredibleenvironment of trust amongst municipal managers across the nation.Because we have included unsuccessful candidates on this list, we request a highcommitment to confidentiality regarding these references. Honorable Debra McCartt, Mayor, City of Amarillo, Texas Mayor McCartt can describe SGR’s experience in helping a large complex organization conduct an incredibly competitive national search with intense media and community attention to the quality of the process as well as the outcome. Email: mayor@amarillo.gov Office: 806-378-3011 Honorable Robert Brady, Mayor, City of Denison, Texas Mayor Brady can provide insights regarding SGR’s ability to assist the City Council identify, evaluate, and select an outstanding candidate when replacing a long term highly respected city manager. Email: rbrady@cityofdenison.com Office: 903-464-4440 Honorable Tom Oliver, Mayor, City of Greenville, Texas Mayor Oliver can provide insights regarding SGR’s ability to fully understand the City’s unique needs and hand select the right finalists. Mayor Oliver can also provide insights regarding how SGR helped a Council with some significantly different perspectives come to a unanimous selection for a City Manager. Email: toliver@ci.greenville.tx.us Home: 903-455-1403 Cell: 903-268-1870 Lake Cabin: 903-883-4923 *Inclusion of these references does not imply endorsement.
  • SGR References, Page 2 of 3Jennifer Fadden, City Manager, City of Colleyville, TexasJennifer was the successful candidate in the recruitment of a City Manager forthe City of Colleyville. She can provide insights into how Ron Holifield handledthe intense scrutiny of the media, how he communicated with her throughoutthe process, and how her impressions of Colleyville were shaped by the way shewas handled as a candidate. Email: faddenj@ci.colleyville.tx.us Phone: 817-503-1116Matt Mueller, City Manager, City of Guthrie, OklahomaMatt has been an unsuccessful candidate in a City Manager handled by SGR andcan provide valuable insights into how he was handled throughout the processand, as an unsuccessful candidate, how likely he would be to engage in anotherprocess SGR handled. Email: mmueller@cityofguthrie.com Phone: 405-282-0496Gina Nash, Assistant City Manager, City of Forney, TexasGina was the successful candidate in the Assistant City Manager search forForney. She can provide insights into how the process worked from acandidate’s point of view. Subsequently, Gina hired SGR to conduct the searchfor the Director of Development Services for Forney. Email: gnash@cityofforney.org Phone: 214-300-5433Charles Daniels, Assistant City Manager, City of Fort Worth, TexasCharles was an unsuccessful candidate in a previous search and can providevaluable insights into how he was handled throughout the process and, as anunsuccessful candidate, how likely he would be to engage in another processSGR handled. He also can provide insights into how well Ron Holifieldunderstands and succeeds in dealing with a large complex organization. Email: Charles.W.Daniels@fortworthgov.org Office: 214-670-3390.Brian Brooks, City Manager, City of Forney, TexasSGR conducted an Assistant City Manager search for Brian after the city hadattempted the search in house on its own. He can specifically address thedifferences in the quality of candidates SGR was able to attract. He also hasbeen through a search process as a candidate with another firm and can addresshow he feels our search process compares to other ones he has engaged in. Email: bbrooks@cityofforney.org Cell: 972-809-9592 *Inclusion of these references does not imply endorsement.
  • SGR References, Page 3 of 3Troy Powell, City Manager, City of The Colony, TexasTroy has served as a city manager in two different states. Troy can provideinsights into SGR’s ability to effectively reach candidates in multiple states aswell as SGR’s reputation regarding the quality of our processes. Email: cm@thecolonytx.gov Office: 972-624-3104Dori Lee, Director of Human Resources, City of Lancaster, TexasDori was the project manager for the Lancaster City Manager search, and RonHolifield worked directly for her in their process. She was active in all Councilmeetings concerning the search and can provide direct insight into how well SGRserviced the more detailed needs of the City’s Human Resources Department, aswell as the Mayor and Council. SGR also conducted a successful Chief BuildingOfficial search for Lancaster after they had unsuccessfully tried to fill the positionusing other methods. The City of Lancaster also utilized SGR to conduct theirsearch for a new Director of Economic Development as well as for their FinanceDirector and Recreation Superintendent. Email: DLee@lancaster-tx.comm Office: 972-218-1111 Cell: 214-549-2792 *Inclusion of these references does not imply endorsement.
  • Unsolicited Feedback Regarding SGR’s PerformanceFollowing are a few unsolicited quotes from emails we have received. This unsolicitedfeedback demonstrates that our practice of using the Golden Rule to determine how wetreat everyone leaves no doubt in the minds of both clients and candidates that we aretruly superior to the competition. We have not included names to avoid the suggestionof an endorsement, which is prohibited under the ICMA Code of Ethics.“Thank you for the follow up. I’m very impressed with theefficiency and professionalism of your organization. It is apleasure working with someone that treats the applicants withrespect.”“Thank you for your e-mails updating me on status as they are anice change of pace from the usual practices of headhunters.”“I am not exaggerating in the least when I say that my experiencewith virtually every single government executive search firm hasbeen abysmal; with the exception of you. I know that yourattention to applicants most likely reflects your attention to theclient as well and I predict you will realize much success based onthat.”“Thank you so much for you continued updates and yourprofessionalism. It is truly refreshing.”“I must say that I am really disappointed I was not selected;however, working with you has been agreat experience. I have been through processes with a couple ofother recruiters over the past couple of years and they do not holda candle to you and the service you provide to your clients and tothe candidates.”“Thank you for the continual attentiveness to ensuring myquestions, concerns, and simple curiosities of the overall processand timelines were completely satisfied.”“I want to thank you for all your good work- sourcing thecandidates, screening/interviewing them and providing insight. Infact I admire how you comprehend the inner nature of things.
  • You’ve provided valuable, articulate counsel during the wholeprocess. I’ve enjoyed working with you.”“Thanks for calling me- how refreshing!”“Thank you very much for your personal touch on this. You go astep beyond what other consultants typically provide, and Iappreciate it. Ill look forward to hearing from you again.”“First let me start by saying Thank You for running such a superbexecutive search for the City of Keller. Your services helpedattract such high-qualified candidates for the position I can onlyimagine what the City Council would have done without yourservices. In the end, the City Council had some tough choices.”“From what I have experienced going through other searchprocesses, the one you are administering has been the mostorganized, responsive, and coordinated processes that I haveparticipated in. This speaks volumes for you and yourcommitment to administering a quality job search process.”“Don’t hesitate to use me as a reference... I would love to tell anyother City Council what a great job you did for us.”“SGR is the only search firm I am willing to apply for jobs through.When I went through a recent search with “”the big name” firmthey didn’t communicate with me, and treated me with disrespect.By contrast, even though I didn’t get the job, SGR was awesome towork with.”“It was such a pleasure working with SGR. We had a lot of anxietygoing in and you made it all so easy and produced final results weare all very proud of.”“Since I began looking at City Manager positions, I have beeninvolved in five other selection processes (two were by SGR theother three were by different companies). I would like tell youfrom the applicant standpoint that your process is far better thanany other process I have encountered. You kept me informedduring the entire process and allowed me to get very comfortablewith the community and Council as we entered the final steps. I
  • have not had that opportunity in any other process. Also yourguidance has been outstanding. You did a great job of representingand protecting the interest of the City while providing me withexceptional personal insight. I just wanted to thank you again forall your help.”
  • Following are a few media quotes regarding our searches from local newspapers. Noother firm has the track record of positive news coverage that SGR has, nor the recordfor producing glowing news coverage about the client as a result of the outstandingsearch results. We encourage you to ask each of the firms you are considering toprovide you with a list and copies of all print and broadcast coverage of any search theyhave done in the last five years that has included any criticism or negative commentsregarding their firm. SGR is the only firm who has received nothing but glowing mediacoverage for our searches and our clients.“Perfection almost always is impossible to achieve and there can be no perfect methodof selecting a chief executive for a city such as Amarillo. Still, the method beingemployed by the City Commission in its search for a new city manager has taken manypositive steps toward that elusive goal of perfection.” Manager Crop Goes on Display –editorial in Amarillo Globe News, November 2010“The process has worked well so far. The city hired a Fort Worth-area consultant to leadthe search. Mayor Debra McCartt has hailed the finalist field, which she said wasselected after a "rigorous review and selection process." The current commission isshowing a refreshing brand of resolve and attention to detail that this selection processdeserves. Whoever emerges as the commissions choice should be strengthened by ahoped-for rigorous process that he should be asked to endure.So, too, would the city.” City Panel Does Right in Search – Amarillo Globe Newseditorial, November, 2010.“a national search produced a top-tier slate of finalists, gleaned from a long list ofapplicants”.... “As Mayor Debra McCartt said...the consulting firm...did its "duediligence" in collecting a long list of qualified applicants...The citys selection process wasstrengthened by the test it put all the candidates through. It also strengthened the handof the man who got the job. Atkinson himself noted right after being appointed that theprocess was as "rigorous" as anything hes experienced since college...Commissioner JimSimms complimented the city for attracting a large field of "quality candidates," addingthat "this must be the Thanksgiving season...Commissioner Brian Eades spoke of the"learning tool" the selection process produced and said the city is going to embark on anew era of better "customer service" for Amarillos residents...This process worked wellfor the city - as will the citys new chief executive officer. Well done.” Process GivesAtkinson Strength - Amarillo Globe News editorial, November, 2010."We are both pleased and surprised at how strong the field of contenders is... We havebeen very deliberate in conducting a thorough national search to find the very bestperson... and based on how strong the field is, the entire City Commission is veryenthusiastic...” Mayor Jimmy McKay, Breckenridge American Newspaper, Dec., 2010.“SGR helps local governments work better by helping them work together.” Paving TheRoad for New Company Officers – story in Texas Fire Chief Magazine, Winter, 2010 thatfocused on SGR’s unique role in helping local governments develop their nextgeneration of leaders.
  • “At the senior executive level you need to know your client base and your market anddeliver a higher level of understanding than an automated system allows.” TheRecruiter Versus the Machine – quoting Ron Holifield in a January, 2011 story on SGR forThe Ladders featuring how SGR’s personal touch in executive search has made SGR astand out among the big name public sector search firms who take a mass productionapproach.“Customer service is incredibly important. We have almost 200 customers and everyone of them has my cell phone number. It builds loyalty among customers.” Ten Waysto Grow Your Business Despite the Economy - quoting Ron Holifield in a November 2010story in American Express Open Forum featuring SGR because of our reputation forexceptional level of customer service that is unmatched by other search firms.“Suddenly small businesses are operating like mini multinationals.” Freelance Nation –a September 2010 story in Entrepreneur Magazine featuring SGR as one of the stand outsmall businesses who were successfully competing against the big name companies byfocusing on superior customer service, and building a networked team of nationalcaliber talent.
  • City of Rockwall, Texas CITY MANAGER POSITION PROFILEThe CommunityThe City of Rockwall is located on the eastern edge of the Dallas-Fort Worth(DFW) Metroplex, one of the fastest growing metropolitan areas in the UnitedStates. Located 20 miles east from downtown Dallas and southeast of theNorth Dallas business areas, Rockwall offers an attractive residentialcommunity and commuter suburb in close proximity to Dallas employment,easily accessible via Interstate 30, State Highway 66, and the recentlycompleted eastern extension to the President George Bush Turnpike. The Cityof Rockwall is the largest city in Rockwall County and has a current populationof approximately 38,500 residents. Rockwall County is the fastest growingcounty in Texas and the fifth fastest growing county in the United States.In the 1850’s, while digging a well, early settlers discovered an undergroundstone wall which appeared to be constructed by prehistoric man (laterdetermined a natural phenomenon); hence, the name “Rockwall” became theidentity for the settlement. Rockwall County was established in 1873 andRockwall was incorporated in 1874. The City of Rockwall has seen progressivegrowth over the last century, which has shifted this small country town into aself-sustaining community. Rockwall is a blend of historic and modernstructures and still maintains the town square surrounding the historiccourthouse. The City of Rockwall was honored with the First Lady’s TexasTreasures Award in 2009, which recognizes communities that show adedication to historic preservation efforts. Rockwall has also been recognizedas a national Main Street community.The real beauty of Rockwall is its hometown feel, beautiful scenery, and all ofthe advantages of a major city. One of only a handful of lakeside communitiesin the DFW Metroplex, Rockwall boasts 72 miles of shoreline for recreational,wildlife, and scenic activities. Named one of the “Best Towns for Families” byFamily Circle Magazine in 2009, maintaining a high quality of life is one of theCity Council’s Key Focus areas. In the 2011 Citizen Survey, Rockwall residentsnoted a 97% quality of life satisfaction rating, in which the low density, highbuilding standards, low crime rate, and the abundant park system could all becontributing factors.In August 2011, CNN/Money Magazine named Rockwall County as “#1 Countyfor Job Creation” in America with a 98% job growth from 2000-2010. A public/private partnership created The Harbor, a premier lakeside destination, whichmixes a resort/conference center, specialty retail stores, restaurants, a movietheatre, and a public park with a boardwalk and boat access.
  • Rockwall City ManagerThe recently completed Presbyterian Hospital complex and medical corridor Position Profileadd state of the art medical facilities to the vibrant community. Nestled on 365acres, Rockwall Technology Park provides a rare advantage to technologycompanies and expansion facilities for existing operations. The Technology Parkoffers the benefits of shovel-ready sites, fast-track permitting, and economicassistance.The City of Rockwall was a Class IV Gold Medal winner by the Texas Recreationand Park Society in 2009, which honors excellence in recreation and parksmanagement. In addition to the numerous parks and trails system, recreationalfacilities include three spray grounds, two public swimming pools, and a seniorcenter. Community events are important to the Rockwall culture with Founder’sDay held on the historic square each spring, a “Concert by the Lake” series atthe Harbor Amphitheater in the spring and summer, and many other eventsthroughout the year. For over 30 years, Rockwall has also been home to theAspasians Art Fair, held twice a year with profits going to scholarships for highschool seniors.The Rockwall Independent School District (RISD) was founded in 1841 and has14,200 students on 18 campuses with a $100 million budget. RISD continuesto excel in academics with an average of a 1073 on SAT for college readinessand rated exemplary or recognized in 24 of 25 accountability measures for theoverall district. There are also five strong private schools that service the City ofRockwall.The City of Rockwall has received the Government Finance OfficersAssociation’s Certificate for Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reportingfor the past 21 years.The median per capita income is $36,050 and the median per capita familyincome is $87,542.City OrganizationThe City of Rockwall is a home rule city with a Council-Manager form ofgovernment. The Rockwall City Council is made up of seven (7) councilmembers. Each council member is elected at-large. Members of Council areelected to two-year terms, expiring on staggered years.The City Council appoints a professional City Manager, who is responsible forthe day-to-day operation of all city departments. Rockwall is a full-service citywith direct reports to the City Manager’s office including Finance, AdministrativeServices (Human Resources and Telecommunications), City Secretary’s office,Planning, Parks and Recreation (Streets, Animal Services), Building Inspections/Code Enforcement, Public Works/Engineering, Internal Operations, and the FireDepartment, which encompasses paid, part-time, and a volunteer staff.The Rockwall Economic Development Corporation operates as a separate entitywith the Board/President reporting directly to the City Council. The Cityoperates a 4A Sales Tax Corporation and a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zonefor the Harbor/PD 32 area.The City of Rockwall has 255 employees and an annual operating budget of$50,813,650.
  • Issues and Challenges Rockwall City Manager Position ProfileRecent city projects include updating the Comprehensive Plan, expanding thecurrent Police Station, relocating the Municipal Courts to a new facility, andinstalling an emergency communication radio system upgrade. Additionally, aRequest for Proposals has been released by the City and the RockwallMunicipal Airport to prepare an Airport Development Plan, which will includeanalysis of existing and future conditions and will propose facility developmentto meet existing and future demands.Like many North Texas communities, Rockwall must address long-termsolutions for water supply given ongoing drought conditions and increaseddemands on the limited water resources.With the uniqueness of the historical nature of Rockwall along with the outwarddevelopment growth, Rockwall is entering into a period where long-terminfrastructure planning will be necessary as well as a focus on redevelopmentand revitalization.As the county seat for Rockwall County and the heart of the RockwallIndependent School District, the City needs to continue to foster a strongrelationship with both entities as well as other community organizations.Ideal CandidateEffective communication skills are a top priority. This is inclusive of transparentand regular communication with the City Council, media, and the Rockwallcitizens. The successful candidate should also be able to listen, understand,and relate city policy and technical issues between city staff, elected officials,the media, and the citizens.A deep commitment to customer service is expected. The successful managerwill ensure follow-through on citizen and City Council issues as well as focus ona customer service vision for the future.Strong financial skills are required. The successful candidate will demonstrateskills to prioritize a budget based on service needs, ability to analyze policyoptions in a fiscal manner, ability to research additional revenue sources, andthe ability to focus on long-term financial and infrastructure decisions.A proven track record for building a cohesive team among city staff andcreating an environment that empowers all employees to utilize their expertiseis desired. The successful candidate should be able to recruit and retain highperformance employees in all areas of city operations.Experience with process improvement and increasing efficiency in servicedelivery is a plus. The successful candidate will embrace technology anddesire continuing education on city services.The City Manager should be engaging, honest, fair, and transparent. He or shewill also have the ability to handle conflict and not be afraid to take calculatedrisks. The City Manager will be able to develop a strong, open atmospherebetween the manager and the City Council.
  • Rockwall City ManagerExperience & Education Position ProfileThe successful candidate should have a Bachelor degree in publicadministration, business administration, or a related field with a minimum of tenyears of progressively responsible experience in municipal operations. AMaster degree in public administration or business administration is preferred.The ideal candidate for this position will have previous city managerexperience, but experience as an assistant city manager or department head ina comparable or larger city will be considered.The successful candidate will be fiscally conservative with a thoroughunderstanding of city operations. The successful candidate will haveexperience with economic development, specifically in redevelopment;analyzing service options and opportunities; long-term visioning; and building astrong team of senior staff members. The candidate should have a proventrack record of managing a high level of citizen engagement, communitybuilding, and a clear and consistent communication style.Compensation & BenefitsThe City of Rockwall offers a competitive starting salary, depending onqualifications and experience. The City participates in the Texas MunicipalRetirement System (TMRS) at the seven percent employee deposit rate with amunicipal matching ratio of 2-1. A full range of leave and insurance benefits isalso provided.Application ProcessTo apply for this position, please email cover letter and resume to:Ron HolifieldStrategic Government ResourcesRon@GovernmentResource.com214-676-1691This position is open until March 1, 2012 although SGR reserves the right toconsider submissions received after the deadline has past. Please visit ourwebsite at www.GovernmentResource.com for the review status of thisposition. The City of Rockwall is an Equal Opportunity Employer and valuesdiversity in its workforce. Applicants selected as finalists for this position willbe subject to a comprehensive background check.
  • Background Screening Report First Check 1500 Corporate Circle Ste 13 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: 817-410-8383 / 888-588-2525 Fax: 888-213-9341FILE NUMBER 1023 REPORT DATE 02-27-2009 LMREPORT TO STRATEGIC GOVERNMENT RESOURCES ORDER DATE 02-26-2009 (20002) REFERENCE CITY OF BEDROCK 1117 Bourland Rd TYPE EXECUTIVE SEARCH - BACKGROUND Keller, TX 76248 CHECK Phone: 817-337-8581 Fax: - Application InformationAPPLICANT FLINTSTONE, FREDERICK SSN123-44-5678 DOB 09-29-XXXXADDRESS(ES) 480 SLATE RD CITY / STATE / ZIP BEDROCK , TX 75189 Identity Development Person Search - SSN TRACE/ ADDRESS VERIFRESULTS Records FoundSSN SEARCHED 123-44-5678 SEARCH DATE 02-26-2009 8:46 AM Applicant InformationFULL NAME / SSN DOB ADDRESS PHONE REPORTED DATE(S)FRED FLINTSTONE XXXX-00 480 HOWELL RD (888)636-2459 First: 1993-04123-44-5678 Age: 49 BEDROCK TX 75189 Last: 2009-02 County: ROCKFREDERICK FLINTSTONE 480 HOWELL RD (888)636-2459 First: 1993-04123-44-5678 BEDROCK, TX 75189 Last: 2007 County: ROCKFRED FLINTSTONE XXXX-00 1006 COLUMBINE DR First: 1996-08123-44-5678 Age: 49 SUGAR, TX 75043 Last: 2004-06 County: TILEFRED FLINTSTONE 306 W VISTA DR First: 2002-04123-44-5678 SUGAR, TX 75041 Last: 2002-06 County: TILEFRED R FLINTSTONE XXXX-09-29 1824 DEVON First: 1990-12123-44-5678 Age: 49 SUGAR, TX 75041 Last: 1990-12 County: TILEFRED FLINTSTONE XXXX-00 1518 COLONEL DR123-44-5678 Age: 49 CREEK, AR 71839 County: MILLERFREDDY FLINTSTONE XXXX-00 1824 DEVONSHIRE DR123-44-5678 Age: 49 GARLAND CITY, AR 71839 County: MILLERFRED R FLINTSTONE 1518 COLONEL DR123-44-5678 CREEK, TX 75043 County: DALLAS SSN InformationSSN VALID ISSUED LOCATION ISSUED DATE RANGE123-44-5678 SSN is valid.Issued in Texas 1974WARNING: This search may not be used as the basis for an adverse action on an applicant. It should only be used to verify or correct an applicants information, or as a tool to further research of public records or other verifications. Credit Credit SummaryTOTAL TRADELINES 40 30 DAYS LATE 0CURRENTLY SATISFACTORY 40 60 DAYS LATE 0CURRENTLY DELINQUENT 0 90 DAYS LATE 0PREVIOUSLY DELINQUENT 0 NEWEST TRADE 09/01/08COLLECTION/CHR OFFS 0/0 OLDEST TRADE 12/01/79PUBLIC RECORDS 0 INQUIRIES 0 Financial Summary # PAYMENT TTL BALANCE PAST DUE UTILIZATION MORTGAGE 2
  • $1458 $80157 $0 INSTALLMENT 15 $575 $47296 $0 OPEN 0 $0 $0 $0 REVOLVING 23 $75 $1689 $0 OTHER 0 $0 $0 $0 40 $2108 $129142 $0Warning; Use careful judgment the past due column of this financial summary may possibly combine amounts of an original creditor with amounts froma collection agency collecting for the original creditor. A single debt could be included as a trade amount and with the collection agency. In a few cases, this single debt can appear as a judgment in the public records section, as well. Variations Personal Information Comparison NAME SOC SEC DOB AKAAPPLICANT FLINTSTONE, FRED 123-44-5678 09/29/1959XP FLINTSTONE, FREDERICK MATCH 09/29/59 FRED FLINTSTONE MATCH Address Comparison ADDRESS REPORTED 480 HOWELL ROAD , BEDROCK, TX 75189 02/27/09APPLICANT XP 480 HOWELL RD , BEDROCK, TX 75189 10-2008APPLICANT XP ROYSE CITY TX , BEDROCK, TX 75189 01-2001APPLICANT XP 1006 COLUMBINE DR , SUGAR TX 75043 10-1999 Employment Comparison COMPANY POSITION REPORTEDAPPLICANT XP BEDROCK POLICE 09-1994APPLICANT XP SLATE GRAVEL CO 08-1995 Credit Bureau Report Credit History HISTORICAL E REPORTED TIMES TYPE HIGH PAST DUE C CREDITOR OPENING DATE DATE BALANCE PAST DUE PRESENT STATUS CREDIT AMOUNT O MONTHS 30 60 90+ TERMS A REVIEWED DLACOUNTRYWIDE 08/01/02 01/01/09 $125000 $80157 $0 0 0 0 MTG AS AGREED JHOME LOANS 75 01-2009 180 $1458 Remarks: CONVENTIONAL REAL ESTATE LOAN, INCLUDING PURCHASE MONEY FIRSTNISSAN MOTOR 02/01/07 01/01/09 $32086 $20338 $0 0 0 0 AUTO AS AGREED BACCEPTANC 24 01-2009 060 $575SALLIE MAE 08/01/05 01/01/09 $11475 $14118 $0 0 0 0 EDU AS AGREED J 42 01-2006 UNK $0 Remarks: STUDENT LOAN-PAYMENT DEFERREDSALLIE MAE 08/01/06 01/01/09 $11210 $12840 $0 0 0 0 EDU AS AGREED J 30 UNK $0 Remarks: STUDENT LOAN-PAYMENT DEFERREDCITI 01/01/97 02/01/09 $0 $996 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED B 99 02-2009 $20CIT BANK/DFS 02/01/04 01/01/09 $5000 $291 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED B 60 01-2009 $15EXXMBLCITI 01/01/05 02/01/09 $1900 $196 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED B 23 02-2009 $10MCYDSNB 10/01/83 02/01/09 $2000 $97 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED J 30 12-2008 $5GEMB/JCP 02/01/83 02/01/09 $1200 $73 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED J 99 01-2009 $15GEMB/DILLARDS 01/01/83 02/01/09 $4000 $36 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED J 99 02-2009 $10AMERICAN HONDA 03/01/00 11/01/00 $15056 $0 $0 0 0 0 AUTO AS AGREED BFINANCE 8 060 $0BALLY TOTAL 01/01/88 02/01/03 $1102 $0 $0 0 0 0 INST AS AGREED BFITNESS 1 024 $0 Remarks: INSTALLMENT SALES CONTRACTBANK OF AMERICA 05/01/02 10/01/04 $11680 $0 $0 0 0 0 AUTO AS AGREED B 30 060
  • HISTORICAL E REPORTED TIMES TYPE HIGH PAST DUE C CREDITOR OPENING DATE DATE BALANCE PAST DUE PRESENT STATUS CREDIT AMOUNT O MONTHS 30 60 90+ TERMS A REVIEWED DLA $0BANK OF AMERICA 12/01/99 11/01/01 $4478 $0 $0 0 0 0 INST AS AGREED J 24 036 $0 Remarks: INSTALLMENT LOANCHASE 12/01/01 06/01/02 $8122 $0 $0 0 0 0 AUTO AS AGREED B 6 048 $0CHASE 05/01/99 03/01/00 $20891 $0 $0 0 0 0 AUTO AS AGREED B 11 060 $0CHASE 09/01/94 02/01/09 $21000 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED B 79 02-2007 $0CITI/SHELL 09/01/83 02/01/09 $800 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED J 88 01-2009 $0CITIFINANCIAL 03/01/01 12/01/03 $1688 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED BRETAIL S 35 $0COMPASS BANK 07/01/04 04/01/07 $33949 $0 $0 0 0 0 AUTO AS AGREED B 34 03-2007 066 $0CREDIT UNION OF 01/01/02 04/01/06 $5000 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED JTEXAS 51 07-2005 $0 Remarks: ACCOUNT CLOSED DUE TO TRANSFER OR REFINANCE; ACCOUNT CLOSED DUE TO TRANSFERCREDIT UNION OF 01/01/02 09/01/07 $1797 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED JTEXAS 43 01-2006 $0 Remarks: ACCOUNT CLOSED AT CONSUMERS REQUESTDISCOVER FIN 04/01/86 02/01/09 $11900 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED JSVCS LLC 99 06-2004 $0FIRST USA BANK N 09/01/94 10/01/04 $21000 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED BA 99 $0 Remarks: ACCOUNT CLOSED AT CONSUMERS REQUESTFORD CRED 10/01/00 04/01/02 $29758 $0 $0 0 0 0 AUTO AS AGREED B 19 060 $0GDYR/CBSD 03/01/88 02/01/09 $4750 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED B 80 12-2008 $0GMAC 10/01/04 02/01/07 $18088 $0 $0 0 0 0 AUTO AS AGREED B 28 01-2007 060 $0GMAC 04/01/02 01/01/04 $28851 $0 $0 0 0 0 AUTO AS AGREED B 21 066 $0GNB/BEALLS 03/01/98 08/01/03 $2400 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED P 66 $0 Remarks: TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER LENDER; PURCHASED BY ANOTHER LENDERSEARS/CBSD 12/01/79 02/01/09 $20000 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED B 99 03-2000 $0TEXANS CREDIT 04/01/05 09/01/08 $15000 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED BUNION 42 08-2008 $0 Remarks: CHECK CREDIT OR LINE OF CREDITTEXANS CREDIT 08/01/95 01/01/04 $26005 $0 $0 0 0 0 AUTO AS AGREED BUNION 99 045 $0THE AMERICAN 12/01/96 09/01/02 $127400 $0 $0 0 0 0 MTG AS AGREED PNATL BANK 1 030 $0 Remarks: CONVENTIONAL REAL ESTATE LOAN, INCLUDING PURCHASE MONEY FIRSTTRANSAMERICA 02/01/01 04/01/02 $6000 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED PBANK 14 $0 Remarks: TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER LENDERUS BANK 12/01/03 08/01/04 $31308 $0 $0 0 0 0 AUTO AS AGREED B
  • HISTORICAL E REPORTED TIMES TYPE HIGH PAST DUE C CREDITOR OPENING DATE DATE BALANCE PAST DUE PRESENT STATUS CREDIT AMOUNT O MONTHS 30 60 90+ TERMS A REVIEWED DLA 9 066 $0US BANK/NA ND 09/01/08 01/01/09 $1000 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED J 5 12-2008 $0USAA FEDERAL 04/01/91 02/01/09 $17500 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED JSAVINGS B 99 01-2009 $0WFNNB/BEALLS 03/01/98 02/01/09 $2400 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED J 85 03-2008 $0WFNNB/VICTORIAS 12/01/93 02/01/09 $1250 $0 $0 0 0 0 REV AS AGREED BSECRET 38 02-2009 $0CREDIT UNION OF 01/01/02 09/01/07 $5000 $ $0 0 0 0 REV CRCDLOST JTEXAS 49 01-2006 $0 Remarks: CREDIT CARD LOST OR STOLEN ECOA KEY: B = BORROWER; C = CO-BORROWER; S = SHARED; J = JOINT; U = UNDESIGNATED; A = AUTHORIZED USER Public Records NO PUBLIC RECORDS DEVELOPED Prior InquiriesCREDITOR INQUIRY TYPE DATE SRC ECOA NO PRIOR INQUIRIES DEVELOPED Repository RemarksXP CONSUMER STATEMENT: 27& 11-11-08 2499947 ID SECURITY ALERT: FRAUDULENT APPLICATIONS MAY BE SUBMITTED IN MY NAME OR MY IDENTITY MAY HAVE BEEN USED WITHOUT MY CONSENT TO FRAUDULENTLY OBTAIN GOODS OR SERVICES. DO NOT EXTEND CREDIT WITHOUT FIRST VERIFYING THE IDENTITY OF THE APPLICANT. I CAN BE REACHED AT 972-977-7184. THIS SECURITY ALERT WILL BE MAINTAINED FOR 90 DAYS BEGINNING 11-11-08.XP CONSUMER STATEMENT: USER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COPY OF THE SUMMARY OF THE CONSUMERS RIGHTS PRESCRIBED BY THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION UNDER SECTION 609 (c) (3) OF THE FCRA ("CONSUMERS RIGHTS"). BY ACCEPTING THIS REPORT, THE USER HEREBY CERTIFIES AND CONFIRMS THAT HE OR SHE WILL ATTACH A COPY OF THE CONSUMERS RIGHTS TO THE REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 604 (b) (1) (B) OF THE FCRA. Source Information CreditorsCREDITOR SUB CODE ADDRESS PHONE 3625 W ROYAL LN STE 200, IRVING, TXAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 3600888 214-277-5200 75063 7755 CENTER AVE STE 440, HUNTINGTONBALLY TOTAL FITNESS 0300750 562-484-2980 BEACH, CA 92647BANK OF AMERICA 1198830 201 N TRYON ST, CHARLOTTE, NC 28255 BYMAILONLY 201 N WALNUT ST # DE1-10, WILMINGTON,CHASE 1101969 BYMAILONLY DE 19801CITI CC 1240000 PO BOX 6500, SIOUX FALLS, SD 57117 800-843-0777CITIFINANCIAL RETAIL S 1138180 PO BOX 6080, NEWARK DE 19714 1-800-643-5607COMPASS BANK 1100940 15 20TH ST S FL 9, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35233 205-558-6403 400 COUNTRYWIDE WAY, SIMI VALLEY, CACOUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS 3991532 805-520-5100 93065CREDIT UNION OF TEXAS 3240147 PO BOX 515169, DALLAS, TX 75251 972-669-9166DELL FINANCIAL SVCS/CI 1616760 3500A WADLEY PL, AUSTIN, TX 78727 800-955-3355DISCOVER FINANCIAL SVC 3276502 PO BOX 15316, WILMINGTON DE 19850 800-347-2683EXXMBLCITI 1402260 PO BOX 6497, SIOUX FALLS, SD 57117 800-950-5114FIRST USA BANK N A 1260958 1523 CONCORD PK, WILMINGTON, DE 19803 800-955-9900FIRSTAR 1183670 PO BOX 2188, OSHKOSH, WI 54903 800-934-8849FORD CRED 1631440 PO BOX BOX 542000, OMAHA, NE 68154 800-727-7000GEMB/DILLARDS 1355850 PO BOX 981400, EL PASO, TX 79998 BYMAILONLYGEMB/JCP 3321860 PO BOX 984100, EL PASO, TX 79998 800-542-0800GMAC 2611005 PO BOX 2150, GREELEY, CO 80632 800-200-4622 1020 WILLOWCREEK DR, JACKSONVILLE, TXGNB/BEALLS 3376833 BYMAILONLY 75766MCYDSNB 1362830 9111 DUKE BLVD, MASON, OH 45040 800-458-6229NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANC 3696046 PO BOX 660360, DALLAS, TX 75266 800-950-6622SALLIE MAE 3RD PTY LSC 1993837 1002 ARTHUR AVE, PANAMA CITY, FL 32401 900-555-7562SEARS/CBSD 1230730 PO BOX 6189, SIOUX FALLS, SD 57117 BYMAILONLYTEXANS CREDIT UNION 2760049 777 E CAMPBELL RD, RICHARDSON, TX 75081 BYMAILONLYTHE AMERICAN NATL BANK 3183032 PO BOX 40, TERRELL, TX 75160 972-524-3411TRANSAMERICA BANK 1673018 11227 LAKEVIEW AVE, LENEXA, KS 66219 BYMAILONLYUS BANK/NA ND 3143770 4325 17TH AVE SW, FARGO ND 58125 BYMAILONLYUSAA FEDERAL SAVINGS B 2201031 PO BOX 47504, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78265 BYMAILONLYWFNNB/BEALLS 1350930 PO BOX 2974, MISSION, KS 66201 800-315-7260
  • WFNNB/VICTORIAS SECRET 1348810 PO BOX 182128, COLUMBUS, OH 43218 800-695-9478 Submission ResultsAPPLICANT BUREAU DATE RESULTAPPLICANT EXPERIAN 02/27/09 08:46:32 AM RECORD FOUND Repository ReferralExperianP.O. Box 2002Allen, TX 75013888-397-3742 Comments *** End of Credit Report *** Investigative County Criminal Records SearchRESULTS No Reportable Records FoundNAME SEARCHED FLINTSTONE, FRED SEARCH DATE 02-27-2009 12:29 PMDOB SEARCHED 09-29-XXXX SEARCH SCOPE 7 yearsJURISDICTION TX-HUNTRESULTS No Reportable Records FoundNAME SEARCHED FLINTSTONE, FRED SEARCH DATE 02-26-2009 12:58 PMDOB SEARCHED 09-29-XXXX SEARCH SCOPE 7 yearsJURISDICTION TX-ROCK CAUTION: Based on the information provided First Check searched for public records in the sources referenced herein for criminal history information as permitted by federal and state law. No Reportable Records Found means that our researchers could not locate a record that matched at least two personal identifiers (i.e., Name, SSN, Dateof Birth, Address) for the subject in that jurisdiction. Further investigation into additional jurisdictions, or utilization of additional identifying information, may be warranted. Please call for assistance. COLLIN COUNTYNO REPORTABLE RECORDS FOUNDFREDERICK FLINTSTONE02/26/09 DALLAS COUNTYNO REPORTABLE RECORDS FOUNDFREDERICK FLINTSTONE02/26/09 DENTON COUNTYNO REPORTABLE RECORDS FOUNDFREDERICK FLINTSTONE02/26/09 Nationwide Wants and WarrantsNO OPEN WANTS OR WARRANTS FOUNDFREDERICK FLINTSTONE02/27/09 TARRANT COUNTYNO REPORTABLE RECORDS FOUNDFREDERICK FLINTSTONE02/26/09 State Criminal Records SearchRESULTS No Reportable Records FoundNAME SEARCHED FLINTSTONE, FREDERICK SEARCH DATE 02-26-2009 12:59 PMDOB SEARCHED 09-29-XXXX SEARCH SCOPE 7 yearsJURISDICTION TEXAS CAUTION: Based on the information provided First Check searched for public records in the sources referenced herein for criminal history information as permitted by federal and state law. No Reportable Records Found means that our researchers could not locate a record that matched at least two personal identifiers (i.e., Name, SSN, Dateof Birth, Address) for the subject in that jurisdiction. Further investigation into additional jurisdictions, or utilization of additional identifying information, may be warranted. Please call for assistance. Federal Criminal Records SearchRESULTS No Reportable Records Found
  • NAME SEARCHED FLINTONE, FREDERICK SEARCH DATE 02-26-2009 12:59 PMDOB SEARCHED 09-29-XXXX SEARCH SCOPE 7 yearsJURISDICTION TEXAS NORTHERN CAUTION: Based on the information provided First Check searched for public records in the sources referenced herein for criminal history information as permitted by federal and state law. No Reportable Records Found means that our researchers could not locate a record that matched at least two personal identifiers (i.e., Name, SSN, Dateof Birth, Address) for the subject in that jurisdiction. Further investigation into additional jurisdictions, or utilization of additional identifying information, may be warranted. Please call for assistance. InstaCriminal National SearchRESULTS No Reportable Records FoundNAME SEARCHED FLINTSTONE, FREDERICK SEARCH DATE 02-26-2009 8:46 AMDOB SEARCHED 09-29-XXXX SEARCH SCOPEJURISDICTION NATIONWIDEJURISDICTION(S) SEARCHEDThe search you have selected is a search of our criminal database(s) and may not represent 100% coverage of allcriminal records in all jurisdictions and/or sources. Coverage details available upon request. CAUTION: Based on the information provided First Check searched for public records in the sources referenced herein for criminal history information as permitted by federal and state law. No Reportable Records Found means that our researchers could not locate a record that matched at least two personal identifiers (i.e., Name, SSN, Dateof Birth, Address) for the subject in that jurisdiction. Further investigation into additional jurisdictions, or utilization of additional identifying information, may be warranted. Please call for assistance. Global Homeland Security SearchRESULTS No Reportable Records FoundNAME SEARCHED FLINTSTONE, FREDERICK SEARCH DATE 02-26-2009 8:46 AMSOURCES Australian Reserve Bank Sanctions List Bank of England Sanctions List Debarred Parties List (Directorate of Defense Trade Controls) Denied Persons List European Union Terrorism Sanctions List FDA Office of Regulatory Affairs Debarment List Fugitive List Health and Human Services Exclusion List Interpol Most Wanted Office of the Comptroller of Currency Enforcement Actions List OFAC (Specially Designated Nationals List) Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) OFSI (Canadian Sanctions List) United Nations Consolidated Sanctions List Palestinian Legislative Council List US General Services Administration Excluded Parties List World Bank Listing of Ineligible Individuals CAUTION: Based on the information provided First Check searched for public records in the sources referenced herein for criminal history information as permitted by applicable laws. No Reportable Records Found means that our researchers could not locate a record that matched. Further investigation into additional jurisdictions, or utilization of additional identifying information, may be warranted. Please call for assistance. Sex Offender Records SearchRESULTS No Reportable Records FoundNAME SEARCHED FLINTSTONE, FREDERICK SEARCH DATE 02-26-2009 12:59 PMDOB SEARCHED 09-29-XXXX SEARCH SCOPEJURISDICTION TEXAS CAUTION: Based on the information provided First Check searched for public records in the sources referenced herein for criminal history information as permitted by applicable laws. No Reportable Records Found means that our researchers could not locate a record that matched. Further investigation into additional jurisdictions, or utilization of additional identifying information, may be warranted. Please call for assistance. County Civil Records SearchRESULTS No Reportable Records FoundNAME SEARCHED FLINTSTONE, FREDERICK SEARCH DATE 02-26-2009 1:00 PMDOB SEARCHED 09-29-XXXX SEARCH SCOPE 7 yearsJURISDICTION TX-COLLIN
  • RESULTS No Reportable Records FoundNAME SEARCHED FLINTSTONE, FREDERICK SEARCH DATE 02-27-2009 12:39 PMDOB SEARCHED 09-29-XXXX SEARCH SCOPE 7 yearsJURISDICTION TX-TILERESULTS No Reportable Records FoundNAME SEARCHED FLINTSTONE,FREDERICKDOB SEARCHED 09-29-XXXX SEARCH SCOPE 7 yearsJURISDICTION TX-ROCK CAUTION: Based on the information provided First Check searched for public records in the sources referenced herein for civil history information as permitted by federal and state law. No Reportable Records Found means that our researchers could not locate a record that matched at least two personal identifiers (i.e., Name, SSN, Date of Birth, Address) for the subject in that jurisdiction. Further investigation into additional jurisdictions, or utilization of additional identifying information, may be warranted. Please call for assistance. Credentials Instant Driving RecordsRESULTS License FoundSTATE OF ISSUE Texas SEARCH DATE 02-26-2009 8:46 AMLICENSE NUMBER 05554441 License Number: 05554441 License State: TX Full Name: FLINTSTONE, FREDERICK DOB: XXXX-09-29 Address: 480 HOWELL RD BEDROCK, TX 751890000 License Info Status: CLEAR Class: CM Class Description: C - Single or comb veh , not in class A or B,M - Motorcycle or moped Expiration Date: 2013-09-29 Original Issue Date: 1974-10-10 Other License Info Report Message: RECORD CONTAINS NO REPORTED CONVICTIONS OR ACCIDENTS WITH CITATIONS IN LAST 3 YEARS. MVR Status: MVR found MVR Score: 0 Messages THIS TYPE RECORD WILL NOT REFLECT COMPLETION OF A DRIVING SAFETY COURSE. THIS TYPE RECORD WILL NOT REFLECT OFFENSES OR RELATED SUSPENSIONS UNDER ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CODE 106.041 OR 106.071. WARNING: Confidential Information - To Be Used As Per State And Federal Laws. Misuse May Result In A Criminal Prosecution.
  • COMPREHENSIVE REPORTSubject Information:Name: FREDERICK FLINTSTONEDate of Birth: 9/29/1959Age: 49SSN: 123-44-5678 issued in Texasbetween 1/1/1974 and 12/31/1974Names Associated With Subject: FRED FLINTSTONE DOB: 1/1960 Age: 49 452-27-xxxx issued in Texas between 1/1/1974 and 12/31/1974 FRED R FLINTSTONE DOB: 9/29/1959 Age: 49 452-27-xxxx issued in Texas between 1/1/1974 and 12/31/1974Others Associated With Subjects SSN:(DOES NOT usually indicate any type of fraud or deception) [None Found]Comprehensive Report Summary:Names Associated With Subject 2 FoundOthers Associated With Subjects SSN None Found None Found Possible Criminal Records None Found Sexual Offenses 8 Found Motor Vehicles Registered None Found Concealed Weapons Permit None Found Professional Licenses None Found FAA Aircrafts None Found Watercraft None Found Bankruptcies None Found Liens and Judgments 1 Found UCC Filings 0 Found Possible Properties OwnedAddress Summary:Address County Dates Maps480 HOWELL RD, BEDFORD TX 75189 -61081006 COLUMBINE DR, SUGAR TX 75043 -1815 DALLAS May 1984 - Jun 2004 N/A306 W VISTA DR, SUGAR TX 75041 -3025 CTILE Apr 2002 - Jun 2002 N/A1518 COLONEL DR, SUGAR TX 75043 -1219 WHARTON May 1984 - Nov 2000 N/A1824 DEVONSHIRE DR, SUGAR TX 75041 -1515 DALLAS May 1984 - Dec 1990 N/AActive Address(es): 480 HOWELL RD, BEDFORD TX 75189 -6108, COLLIN COUNTY (Apr 1993 - Feb 2009) Current Residents at Address: FRED FLINTSTONE WILMA FLINTSTONE PEBBLE FLINTSTONE Property Ownership Information for this Address Property: Parcel Number - Name Owner : FLINTSTONE, FREDERICK Property Address: - 480 HOWELL RD, BEDFORD TX 75189 -6108, TILE COUNTY Owner Address: 480 HOWELL RD, BEDFORD TX 75189 -6108, TILE COUNTY Data Source - APrevious And Non-Verified Address(es): 1006 COLUMBINE DR, SUGAR TX 75043 -1815, ROCK COUNTY (May 1984 - Jun 2004) Current Residents at Address: P GREEN DANNY GREEN Property Ownership Information for this Address Property: Parcel Number - 26 -- 005-023 -0000 Book - 96168 Page - 1686 Name Owner : GREEN P W Name Owner 2: GREEN DANNY D Property Address: - 1006 COLUMBINE DR, SUGAR TX 75043- 1815, ROCK COUNTY Owner Address: 1006 COLUMBINE DR, SUGAR TX 75043 -1815, ROCK COUNTY Land Usage - SFR Total Market Value - $101,070 Land Value - $24,000 Improvement Value - $77,070 Land Size - 7,183 Square Feet Year Built - 1978 Name of Seller : FLINTSTONE, FRED Loan Amount - $74,131
  • Loan Type - FEDERAL HOUSING AUTHORITY Lender Name - CTX MTG CO Data Source - A Property: Parcel Number - Name Owner : GREEN, P Property Address: - 1006 COLUMBINE DR, SUGAR TX 75043- 1815, ROCK COUNTY Owner Address: 1006 COLUMBINE DR, SUGAR TX 75043 -1815, ROCK COUNTY Name of Seller : FLINTSTONE, FRED & WILMA Data Source - A Property: Parcel Number - 26 -3330- 005-023 -00 -00 Book - 96168 Page - 1686 Name Owner : GREEN PW & DANNY Property Address: - 1006 COLUMBINE DR, SUGAR TX 75043- 1815,ROCK COUNTY Owner Address: 1006 COLUMBINE DR, SUGAR TX 75043 -1815, ROCK COUNTY Land Usage - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Total Market Value - $101,070 Land Value - $24,000 Improvement Value - $77,070 Year Built - 1978 Data Source - B 306 W VISTA DR, SUGAR TX 75041 -3025, ROCK COUNTY (Apr 2002 - Jun 2002) Current Residents at Address: BARNEY RUBBLE BETTY RUBBLE BAM BAM RUBBLE BECKY RUBBLE Property Ownership Information for this Address Property: Parcel Number - 26 -4-009 -0000 Name Owner : RUBBLE, BARNARD Property Address: - 306 W VISTA DR, SUGAR TX 75041 -3025,ROCK COUNTY Owner Address: 306 W VISTA DR, SUGAR TX 75041 -3025, ROCK COUNTY Total Market Value - $95,240 Land Value - $13,750 Improvement Value - $81,490 Land Size - 9,239 Square Feet Year Built - 1959 Name of Seller : FLINTSTONE, FRED Loan Amount - $96,337 Loan Type - FEDERAL HOUSING AUTHORITY Lender Name - AMERICAN MTG CO Data Source - A 1518 COLONEL DR, SUGAR TX 75043 - 1219, WHINEY COUNTY (May 1984 - Nov 2000) Current Residents at Address: MICKEY MOUSE JR MINNE MOUNSE Property Ownership Information for this Address Property: Parcel Number - 26 - 007-013 -0000 Name Owner : MOUSE, MICKEY Property Address: - 1518 COLONEL DR, SUGAR TX 75043 -1219,ROCK COUNTY Owner Address: 1518 COLONEL DR, SUGAR TX 75043 - 1219,ROCK COUNTY Total Market Value - $171,120 Land Value - $40,000 Improvement Value - $131,120 Land Size - 12,000 Square Feet Year Built - 1978 Data Source - A1824 DEVONSHIRE DR, SUGAR TX 75041 -1515, ROCK COUNTY (May 1984 - Dec 1990) Current Residents at Address: SPONGEBOB SQUAREPANTS PATRICK STAR Property Ownership Information for this Address Property: Parcel Number - 26 -2-006 -00 -00 Book - 93094 Page - 2306 Name Owner : CRABB FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD Property Address: - 1824 DEVONSHIRE DR, SUGAR TX 75041 -1515,ROCK COUNTY Owner Address: 7602 MERRITT RD, OCEAN TX 75089 -2100, LIME COUNTY Land Usage - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Total Market Value - $27,590 Land Value - $16,000 Improvement Value - $11,590 Year Built - 1951 Data Source - B Possible Criminal Records: [None Found] Sexual Offenses: [None Found] Motor Vehicles Registered To Subject: Vehicle: Description: 2004 Cadillac CTS - Sedan 4 Door VIN: 1G640126002 State Of Origin: TEXAS Engine: 6 Cylinder 220 Cubic Inch Anti Lock Brakes: 4 wheel standard Air Conditioning: Standard Daytime Running Lights: Standard
  • Power Steering: Standard Power Brakes: Standard Power Windows: Standard Security System: Pass key Roof: None / not available Price: 30835 Radio: AM/FM Cassette Front Wheel Drive: No Four Wheel Drive: No Tilt Wheel: Standard Owner(s) Name: FRED FLINTSTONE Potential SSN : 123-44-5678 Address: 480 HOWELL RD, BEDFORD TX 75189 -6108, TILE COUNTY DOB: 9/29/1959 Age: 49 Title Number: 05743132091858 Title Status: Clear Title To Vehicle Title Issue Date: 1/7/2004 Odometer Mileage: 93 Lien Holder(s) Record Type: HISTORICAL Lien Date: 12/6/2003Vehicle: Description: 2004 Chevrolet C1500 Silverado - Pickup VIN: 1GCEXXXXX244320 State Of Origin: TEXAS Engine: 6 Cylinder 262 Cubic Inch Anti Lock Brakes: 4 wheel standard Air Conditioning: Standard Daytime Running Lights: Standard Power Steering: Standard Power Brakes: Standard Power Windows: Optional Security System: Pass key Roof: None / not available Price: 20215 Radio: AM/FM Cassette Front Wheel Drive: No Four Wheel Drive: No Tilt Wheel: Standard Owner(s) Name: FREDERICK FLINTSTONE Potential SSN : 123-44-5678 Address: 480 HOWELL RD, BEDROCK TX 75189 -6108, TILE COUNTY DOB: 9/29/1959 Age: 49 Title Number: 12920170092203 Title Status: Clear Title To Vehicle Title Issue Date: 11/5/2004 Odometer Mileage: 115 Lien Holder(s) Record Type: HISTORICAL Lien Date: 10/9/2004Vehicle: Description: 2000 Honda XR80R - Dirt Motorcycle VIN: JH2XXX6YK901447 State Of Origin: TEXAS Engine: 1 Cylinder 80 Cubic Inch Price: 1999 Owner(s) Name: FRED FLINTSTONE Potential SSN : 123-44-5678 Address: 480 HOWELL RD, BEDFORD TX 75189 -6108, TILE COUNTY DOB: 9/29/1959 Age: 49 Title Number: 116001150305 Title Status: Superceded By Title-In-Progress Title Issue Date: 12/17/1999 Odometer Mileage: 1 Lien Holder(s) Record Type: HISTORICAL Lien Date: 12/4/1999Vehicle: Description: 2005 Cadillac C/T CTS HI Feature V6 - Sedan 4 Door VIN: 1G6DP56751415 State Of Origin: TEXAS Engine: 6 Cylinder 220 Cubic Inch Anti Lock Brakes: 4 wheel standard Air Conditioning: Standard Daytime Running Lights: Standard Power Steering: Standard Power Brakes: Standard Power Windows: Standard Security System: Pass key
  • Roof: None / not available Price: 32440 Radio: AM/FM CD Front Wheel Drive: No Four Wheel Drive: No Tilt Wheel: Standard Owner(s) Name: FRED FLINTSTONE Potential SSN : 123-44-5678 Address: 480 HOWELL RD, BEDROCK TX 75189 -6108, TILE COUNTY DOB: 9/29/1959 Age: 49 Title Number: 043133420 Title Status: Clear Title To Vehicle Title Issue Date: 8/16/2004 Odometer Mileage: 7 Lien Holder(s) Record Type: HISTORICAL Lien Date: 7/23/2004Vehicle: Description: 2002 Chevrolet C1500 Tahoe - 4 Dr Wagon Sport Utility VIN: 1GNEC1XXX227917 State Of Origin: TEXAS Engine: 8 Cylinder 293 Cubic Inch Anti Lock Brakes: 4 wheel standard Air Conditioning: Standard Daytime Running Lights: Standard Power Steering: Standard Power Brakes: Standard Power Windows: Standard Security System: Anti-theft device Roof: None / not available Price: 32364 Radio: AM/FM CD Front Wheel Drive: No Four Wheel Drive: No Tilt Wheel: Standard Owner(s) Name: FRED FLINTSTONE Potential SSN : 123-44-5678 Address: 480 HOWELL RD, BEDFORD, TX 75189 -6108, TILE COUNTY DOB: 9/29/1959 Age: 49 Title Number: 19360083955 Title Status: Superceded By Title-In-Progress Title Issue Date: 4/30/2002 Odometer Mileage: 240 Lien Holder(s) Record Type: HISTORICAL Lien Date: 4/4/2002Vehicle: Description: 2002 Dodge Ram 1500 - Pickup VIN: 1XXXK72J232340 State Of Origin: TEXAS Engine: 6 Cylinder 225 Cubic Inch Restraints: Dual front air bags/active belts Anti Lock Brakes: 4 wheel standard Air Conditioning: Standard Daytime Running Lights: Not available Power Steering: Standard Power Brakes: Standard Power Windows: Optional Security System: Unknown Roof: None / not available Price: 16955 Radio: AM/FM Cassette Front Wheel Drive: No Four Wheel Drive: No Tilt Wheel: Optional Owner(s) Name: JODY L LAY Potential SSN : 452-27-xxxx Address: 480 HOWELL RD, ROYSE CITY TX 75189-6108, COLLIN COUNTY DOB: 9/29/1959 Age: 49 Title Number: 12925037394135717 Title Status: Clear Title To Vehicle Title Issue Date: 6/5/2002 Odometer Mileage: 15 Lien Holder(s) Record Type: HISTORICAL Lien Date: 5/8/2002Vehicle: Description: 2000 Yamaha RT100 - Trail/Dirt Motorcycle VIN: JYA3UL033YA000475
  • State Of Origin: TEXAS Engine: 1 Cylinder 97 Cubic Inch Price: 2049 Owner(s) Name: FRED FLINTSTONE Potential SSN : 123-44-5678 Address: 480 HOWELL RD, BEDFORD, TX 75189 -6108, TILE COUNTY DOB: 9/29/1959 Age: 49 Title Number: 11601150728 Title Status: Clear Title To Vehicle Title Issue Date: 12/17/1999 Odometer Mileage: 1 Lien Holder(s) Record Type: CURRENT Lien Date: 12/3/1999Vehicle: Description: 1999 Ford F250 Super Duty - 4 Door Ext. Cab Pickup VIN: 1FTXXX1XED28242 State Of Origin: TEXAS Engine: 8 Cylinder 330 Cubic Inch Restraints: Dual front air bags/active belts Anti Lock Brakes: ABS standard, wheels unknown Air Conditioning: Optional Daytime Running Lights: Optional Power Steering: Standard Power Brakes: Standard Power Windows: Optional Security System: Unknown Roof: None / not available Price: 20820 Radio: AM/FM Front Wheel Drive: No Four Wheel Drive: No Tilt Wheel: Optional Owner(s) Name: FRED FLINTSTONE Potential SSN : 123-44-5678 Address: 480 HOWELL RD, BEDFORD TX 75189 -6108, TILE COUNTY DOB: 9/29/1959 Age: 49 Title Number: 0574525100 Title Status: Clear Title To Vehicle Title Issue Date: 3/4/1999 Odometer Mileage: 17 Lien Holder(s) Record Type: HISTORICAL Lien Date: 2/3/1999Concealed Weapons Permit:[None Found]Professional License(s):[None Found]FAA Aircrafts:[None Found]Watercraft:[None Found]Bankruptcies:[None Found]Liens and Judgments:[None Found]UCC Filings:Filing Agency Address:Filing State: TXD Debtor(s): Debtor Name: FREDERICK FLINTSTONE Debtor SSN/FEIN: 123-44-5678 Debtor Address: 1006 COLUMBIA DR, SUGAR TX 75043 Secured(s): Secured Name: NORTHPARK NATL BK Secured Address: DALLAS TX 75225 Filing(s): Filing Type: Filing Number: 01122298 Date Filed: Apr 19, 1990 Pages: 20Possible Properties Owned by Subject:Property: Parcel Number - 4495-0000-0003-00-0R Book - 772 Page - 322
  • Name Owner : FLINTSTONE, FRED & WILMA Property Address: - 480 HOWELL RD, BEDROCK TX 75189 -6108, TILE COUNTY Owner Address: 480 HOWELL RD, BEDROCK TX 75189 - 6108, TILE COUNTY Land Usage - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Total Market Value - $195,550 Assessed Value - $195,550 Land Value - $31,950 Improvement Value - $163,600 Year Built - 1996 Data Source - B Property: Parcel Number - 26 -2- 023-0000 Book - 96168 Page - 1686 Name Owner : GREEN DW Name Owner 2: GREEN P Property Address: - 1006 COLUMBINE DR, SUGAR TX 75043 -1815, ROCK COUNTY Owner Address: 1006 COLUMBINE DR, SUGAR TX 75043 -1815, ROCK COUNTY Land Usage - SFR Total Market Value - $101,070 Land Value - $24,000 Improvement Value - $77,070 Land Size - 7,183 Square Feet Year Built - 1978 Name of Seller : FLINTSTONE, FRED & WILMA A Loan Amount - $74,131 Loan Type - FEDERAL HOUSING AUTHORITY Lender Name - MTG CO Data Source - A DisclaimerThis report is furnished to you pursuant to the Agreement for Service between the parties and in compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act. This report is furnished based upon your certification that you have a permissible purposeto obtain the report. The information contained herein was obtained in good faith from sources deemed reliable, but the completeness or accuracy is not guaranteed. *** End Of Report ***
  • City of San AngeloMemo Date: March 14, 2012 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Bob Schneeman Subject: Agenda Item for 03-20-12 Council Meeting Contact: Bob Schneeman / Shawn Lewis 657-4210 Rick Weise 657-4241 Caption: Regular Public Hearing and consideration of approving a recommendation by the City of San Angelo Development Corporation Board of Directors to direct the publication of a 60- day notice of the specific project for public comment period; awarding the following request for bids, approving the release of the bid bond on withdrawal of a bid, and authorizing Interim City Manager to negotiate and execute contracts related to the abatement and demolition of the Qualtrust Building and Cattle Barn on the San Angelo Fairgrounds and the construction of a new livestock barn on the same site, and related matters as follows: a. Consideration of awarding RFB No. CE-01-12 for the Asbestos Abatement and Demolition of Qualtrust Building and Cattle Barn to Empire Environmental in the amount of $67,600.00 to include asbestos abatement, demolition of the existing building, haul off of all materials, and proper disposal thereof; b. Consideration of awarding RFB No. CE-02-11 for construction of a new livestock building to RM Ford Construction in the amount of $1,154,000.00 for the construction of a new 32,400-square-foot livestock barn, RM Ford Construction being the second-lowest bidder, c. Consideration of approving a request by RBR Construction, Inc. for the release of bid bond due to withdrawal of its bid. Summary: Demolition of the existing Qualtrust building and cow barn, including asbestos abatement, must be completed prior to the start of new construction. The San Angelo Stock Show and Rodeo Association would like to have the project complete and available for the 2013 Stock Show and Rodeo. History: The Request for Bids (RFB) No. CE-02-11 was sent out earlier this year with the bid opening February 7, 2012. The RFB for the demolition of the existing building and asbestos abatement RFB No. CE-01-12 had a bid opening of February 21, 2012. The original project budget was $1,000,000.00 to be funded by half-cent sales tax. The low bid for the construction of the new building was $1,140,000.00 base bid, by RBR construction; however, RBR withdrew its bid because of an inability to obtain the required bonds. The second-lowest bid of $1,154,000.00 from RM Ford Construction was therefore recommended for approval by staff and the San Angelo Stock Show & Rodeo Association (SASSRA), and will be considered for approval by COSADC on March 19, 2012. The low bid for the demolition and asbestos abatement was $67,600.00 by Empire
  • Environmental. The architectural and engineering design contract, previously approved, was for $75,000.00 plus reimbursables (printing, inspections, geotech, surveys, soil analysis, ADA/TAS inspections, etc.) which are anticipated to cost approximately $12,000.00. In addition the project will include $14,120.00 to relocate area lighting, $17,350.00 for air quality monitoring associated with abatement, $690.00 for an asbestos survey, $1,172.09 in bidding costs and plan printing, and $868.30 to disconnect Verizon service to the building. This results in an anticipated project cost of $1,342,800.39, including a contingency fund of $100,000.00 in the construction contract and $15,000.00 in the abatement and demolition contract. SASSRA has agreed to provide up to $350,000.00 in additional funding to complete the project on the condition that any unused contingency funds be returned to it. The following is a breakdown of the anticipated total project costs: $52,600.00 Demo - Empire Environmental $15,000.00 Demo Contingency $17,350.00 Air Quality Monitoring $690.00 Asbestos Survey $1172.09 Bidding & Plan Printing Costs $14,120.00 Light Relocation $868.30 Verizon – Service Disconnect $1,054,000.00 Construction - RM Ford Construction $100,000.00 Construction Contingency $75,000.00 Gary Donaldson Architect & Engineering Fees $12,000.00 Gary Donaldson Reimbursables $1,342,800.39 Anticipated Project TotalFinancial Impact: Project total not to exceed $1,350,000.00 (Including SASSRA Funds) $1,000,000.00 (City of San Angelo ½ Cent Funding) $ 350,000.00 (Maximum SASSRA Funding)Related Vision Item N/A(if applicable):Other Information/ Staff recommends approval.Recommendation:Attachments: Bid Tab: Demo, Construction, and Withdrawal LetterPresentation: Community and Economic Development Director Shawn Lewis Assistant City Manager Rick WeisePublication:Reviewed by Community and Economic Development Director Shawn Lewis, 3/14/12Director: Assistant City Manager Rick WeiseApproved by Legal: Pending
  • CITY OF SAN ANGELO RFB: CE-01-12-Livestock Building Abatement and Demolition February 21, 2012/2:00 PM Asbestos AAR EmpireItem No. Item Description Removal Incorporated Enviromental Sisk-Robb Vanco 1 Abatement $ 22,542.00 $ 11,700.00 $ 9,800.00 $ 8,800.00 $ 14,182.00 2 Abatement-Contigency 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 Total 27,542.00 16,700.00 14,800.00 13,800.00 19,182.00 1 Demolition No Bid 75,900.00 42,800.00 84,800.00 79,713.00 2 Demolition-Contigency No Bid 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 Total No Bid 85,900.00 52,800.00 94,800.00 89,713.00 Abatement/Demolition (if awarded 1 together) No Bid 85,600.00 52,600.00 93,600.00 88,895.00 2 Abatement/Demo-Contigency No Bid 15,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 Total No Bid 100,600.00 67,600.00 108,600.00 103,895.00 -Alternate Bids City to remove I - beams and 1 No Bid 75,000.00 10,000.00 28,250.00 3,500.00 columns Unit Price Per Cubic Yard For 2 No Bid 11.00 40.00 15.80 5.00 Caliche Removal Bid Bond Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Y:12-RFXCivic EventsCE0112 Showbarn AbatementBid Tabulation
  • RFBs Sent to:CST Environmental Inc Dallas TX Mid-Texas of Midland Midland TXEDRS, Inc Lubbock TX Pharr Construction Lubbock TXLynx Contractors San Marcos TX Prime Construction Arlington TXNorth American Analytical Lab Inc Abilene TX Rafter C Construction, Inc San Angelo TXSisk Robb Leander TX RBR Construction Weatherford TXTerracon Consulting Midland TX Ridgemont Commercial Construction Irving TXVANCO Midland TX RKJ Construction, Inc. General Contractors Lampassas TXWest Texas Abatement Lubbock TX Roberts Construction Co San Angelo TXZavala Environmental Services Lubbock TX S.W. Sdidel Construction Christoval TXBlanek Construction company San Angelo TX SR Baxter Construction, LLC Wall TXConerstone Builders San Angelo TX Stoddard Construction Management, Inc. Bulverde TXCooper Construction San Angelo TX Templeton Construction San Angelo TXCorfield Constrution San Angelo TX The Fain Group Fort Worth TXG. Creek Construction Austin TX WR Construction, Inc Lubbock TXJC Stoddard Construction Co. San Antonio TX Mr. Daniel Cardenas San Angelo TXLee Lewis Construction San Angelo TX TC Trucking & Construction LLC San Angelo TXMann Contractors LTD Hutto TX SSCi Houston TXMega Contractors Fort Worth TX Y:12-RFXCivic EventsCE0112 Showbarn AbatementBid Tabulation
  • CITY OF SAN ANGELO Bid Tabulation RFB: CE-02-11/Construction of Livestock Building * February 7, 2012Base Bid Item No. Templeton Stoddard Construction Item Description MidTex RM Ford Construction Mega Contractors Prime Construction WR Construction RBR Construction Construction Waldrop Construction Frontera Mgmt Pharr & Company M&M Erectors 1 Construction of Livestock Building $ 1,164,000.00 $ 1,054,000.00 $ 1,183,000.00 $ 1,207,655.00 $ 1,158,000.00 $ 1,040,000.00 $ 1,119,000.00 $ 1,478,400.00 $ 1,117,950.00 $ 1,349,000.00 $ 1,420,000.00 $ 1,489,000.00 Contignecies $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 Total Base Bid $ 1,264,000.00 $ 1,154,000.00 $ 1,283,000.00 $ 1,307,655.00 $ 1,258,000.00 $ 1,140,000.00 $ 1,219,000.00 $ 1,578,400.00 $ 1,217,950.00 $ 1,449,000.00 $ 1,520,000.00 $ 1,589,000.00Alternate Deduction Bids 1 Delete the main front canopy in its entirely ($22,000.00) ($25,492.00) ($20,000.00) ($15,000.00) ($28,083.00) ($21,400.00) ($26,600.00) ($32,650.00) ($23,750.00) ($31,000.00) $6,995.00 ($20,000.00) Delete all the 4” pipe guard railing around the Building and install only the 3’-6” high ($30,000.00) ($24,800.00) ($19,000.00) ($25,000.00) ($38,248.00) ($29,550.00) ($33,600.00) ($13,200.00) ($24,555.00) ($18,000.00) ($20,422.00) ($29,000.00) vertical pipe sections located on either side 2 of rollup doors 3 Delete the ceiling mounted fans #1-11 ($27,000.00) ($23,895.00) ($22,000.00) ($17,000.00) ($22,596.00) ($23,895.00) ($30,700.00) ($26,800.00) ($29,990.00) ($29,000.00) ($27,179.00) ($24,500.00) ADD -dry type fire sprinkler system and alarm. Contractor shall include an allowance $74,000.00 $68,000.00 $70,000.00 $15,000.00 $72,127.00 $77,000.00 $68,800.00 $15,000.00 $88,704.00 $77,000.00 $16,768.00 $49,875.00 cost of $15,000. 4 Bid Bond Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Price for Additional Work: Overhead Profit Overhead Profit Overhead Profit Overhead Profit Overhead Profit Overhead Profit Overhead Profit Overhead Profit Overhead Profit Overhead Profit Overhead Profit Overhead Profit Work performed by the General Contractor: 5% 5% 5% 10% 10% 10% 5% 5% 10% 5% 5% 10% 15% 10% 7% 7% 8% 4% 10% 5% 0% 0% 10% 15% Work performed by Subcontractors 5% 5% 5% 10% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10% 5% 5% 10% 15% 10% 7% 5% 6% 4% 5% 5% 0% 0% 10% 15% Calendar Days to Complete Project: 210 240 240 220 240 240 240 230 240 240 240 240 RFB Invitations Mailed To: Blanek Construction company San Angelo TX M & M Erectors San Angelo TX Conerstone Builders San Angelo TX Mann Contractors LTD Hutto TX Cooper Construction San Angelo TX Mega Contractors Fort Worth TX Corfield Constrution San Angelo TX Mid-Texas of Midland Midland TX G. Creek Construction Austin TX Rafter C Construction, Inc San Angelo TX Garco Contracting Co. Inc San Angelo TX Ridgemont Commercial ConIrving TX Guido Brothers Construction San Antonio TX RKJ Construction, Inc. GC Lampassas TX Harris Acoustics San Angelo TX Roberts Construction Co San Angelo TX Hi-Lite Markings, Inc. Adams Center NY S.W. Sdidel Construction Christoval TX Imperial Construction Ltd. Weatherford TX SR Baxter Construction Wall TX Jay Mills Contracting Inc Stephenville TX Stoddard Construction Mgt Bulverde TX JC Stoddard Construction Co. San Antonio TX Templeton Construction San Angelo TX Keller-Martin Organization, Inc. San Antonio TX The Fain Group Fort Worth TX Lee Lewis Construction San Angelo TXY:11-RFXCivic EventsCE0211 New Livestock BldgBid Tabulation