March 19, 2013 Agenda Packet
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

March 19, 2013 Agenda Packet

on

  • 1,676 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,676
Views on SlideShare
1,618
Embed Views
58

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0

1 Embed 58

http://www.sanangelotexas.us 58

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    March 19, 2013 Agenda Packet March 19, 2013 Agenda Packet Document Transcript

    • NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING AN AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS 9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, March 19, 2013 McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room 500 Rio Concho DriveTHE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTHMAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCEIS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK,ROOM 210, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING.City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. everyday for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting. As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate” Thank You!I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.) A. Call to Order B. Prayer and Pledge "Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible.” C. Proclamations Nutrition Month, March 2013, to be accepted by Betty Teston, Big Country Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics, local organization for Dietitians and members of the American Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics (form) Lutheran Schools Month, March 2013, to be accepted by by Ron Fritsche, Principal of Trinity Lutheran School D. Recognition Rex Rogers, for winning the contest suggesting the name for the City’s government access channel SATV E. Public Comment The Council takes public comment on all items in the Regular Agenda. Public input on a Regular Agenda item will be taken at its appropriate discussion. Public input on an item not on the Agenda or Consent Agenda may be identified and requested for consideration by the Council at this time. The Council may request an item to be placed on a future agenda, or for a Consent Agenda item, to be moved to the Regular Agenda for public comment.II. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Consideration of approving the February 26, 2013 City Council Special meeting minutes and the March 5, 2013 City Council Regular meeting minutes 2. Consideration of adopting a Resolution awarding bid CFM-01-13for Pest Control Services to Bug Express authorizing the City Manager to execute related documents (submitted by Construction & Facilities Manager Ron Lewis)City Council Agenda Page 1 of 5 March 19, 2013
    • 3. Consideration of approving a residential lease renewal located at Lot 104, Group Shady Point, 6678 Knickerbocker Road (Persely), and authorizing the Water Utilities Director to execute the same (submitted by Interim Water Utilities Director Ricky Dickson) 4. Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo authorizing the Mayor to execute a tax-resale (quitclaim) deed conveying all right, title and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the tax foreclosure judgment: a. 1944 & 1948 Magnolia Street, (Gonzalez), Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale, $1,000.00, Suit No.B99-0081- T b. 207 E Avenue L, (Perez), E 50’ x 238’ of a 1 acre Tract, Fisher Miller, $750.00, Suit No.TAX89-0388B c. 725 Hughes Street, (Salinas), Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell, $950.00, Suit No. B-03-0087-T d. 816 Volney, (Salinas) Portion of Lots 6-8, Block 28, Miles, 1,500.00, Suit No. B-05-0192-T e. 111 E 13th Street, (Salinas), Lot 7, Block 57, Miles, $1,200.00, Suit No. B-97-0170-T f. 329 13th Street, (Salinas), Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, $750.00, Suit No.TAX90-0083B g. 1916 Shelton, (Sanchez), S ½ of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres, $2,500.00, Suit No.B-00-0043-T 5. Consideration of adopting a Resolution allowing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a contract with the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau allocating Hotel Occupancy Tax funds (submitted by Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane) 6. Consideration of adopting a Resolution appointing election officials for the election to be held on May 11, 2013; and providing for an effective date (submitted by City Clerk Alicia Ramirez) 7. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with the San Angelo Independent School District (SAISD) providing for construction by the City of recreational and park improvements, not to exceed $175,000.00, for public use on property owned by the SAISD generally known as Bradford Elementary School, to be maintained by the SAISD (submitted by Parks and Recreation Director Carl White) 8. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a first amended lease agreement amending the original lease agreement between City of San Angelo and Howard County Junior College District, including extending the original lease term and providing for additional improvements to be made on leased premises (submitted by Assistant City Manager Rick Weise) 9. Consideration of adopting a Resolution endorsing certain legislative action in the Regular Session of the 83rd Texas Legislature to enhance the competitive electric market and system reliability and to protect the traditional role of cities in the regulatory process (submitted by City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling) 10. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver) PD 13-01: West Company/Granger Macdonald AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently described as Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CH) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYCity Council Agenda Page 2 of 5 March 19, 2013
    • 11. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver) Z 13-02: Debbie Clark AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY 12. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver) Z 13-03: Tom Green County AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY 13. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver) Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY 14. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver) Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THECity Council Agenda Page 3 of 5 March 19, 2013
    • FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY 15. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver) Z 13-07: City of San Angelo Planning AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a Single Family Residential (RS-1) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY 16. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending established boundaries of Single Member District 1 (submitted by City Clerk Alicia Ramirez) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS AMENDING THE ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCORPORATING NEWLY ANNEXED AREAS INTO SAID DISTRICT, PROVIDING FOR PRECLEARANCE AND ALL OTHER NECESSARY ACTIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATEIII. REGULAR AGENDA: F. EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to a company or companies with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations and which the City of San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo G. PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT 17. Update on the design and construction activities for the Hickory Aquifer Water Supply Project (Presentation by Interim Water Utilities Director Ricky Dickson and Hutch Musallam with Carollo Engineers) 18. First public hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending the 2012-2013 Budget for new projects, incomplete projects, capital projects and grants AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2012, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2013, FOR NEW PROJECTS, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS (Presentation by Budget Analyst Steve Mahaffey)City Council Agenda Page 4 of 5 March 19, 2013
    • 19. Public hearing and consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the adoption of the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan for the City of San Angelo (Presentation by Budget Analyst Laura Brooks) 20. Discussion of prohibiting commercial vehicles from using certain streets and parking in certain areas within the San Angelo city limits and any action in connection thereto (Presentation by City Engineer Clinton Bailey) 21. Consideration of granting a request for temporary placement of a mobile home, not to exceed one year, during construction of a permanent home on the same 3 acre site. 1105 West 48th Street, located approximately 320 feet east of the intersection of Lake Drive and West 48 Street; more specifically occupying the Chandler Subdivision, Section 1, Block 1, Lot 2, in northwest San Angelo (Presentation by Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver) 22. First Public Hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending the allocation method of Hotel Occupancy Tax and related matters AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CHAPTER 5 “BUSINESS AND COMMERCE”, ARTICLE 5.800 “HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX”, SECTION 5.805 “PURPOSE AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX”, BY REPEALING SAID SECTION IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 5.805 ENTITLED, “USE OF REVENUE”, TO REMOVE THE MANDATED ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES ON A FIXED PERCENTAGE BASIS AND TO PROVIDE FOR ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES PERMITTED BY LAW AS CITY COUNCIL MAY DETERMINE WILL PROVIDE THE BEST VALUE IN APPLICATION OF HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE TO THE CITIZENS OF SAN ANGELO BY RESOLUTION FROM TIME TO TIME (Presentation by Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane) 23. Discussion and update on the housing data obtained by Hotel/Community Housing Committee Members (Requested by Councilmember Hirschfeld and presentation by City Manager Daniel Valenzuela) H. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES 24. Consideration of and possible action on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session, if needed 25. Consideration of approving a Board nomination by Council and designated Councilmember: a. Planning Commission: Valerie Priess (Mayor) to an unexpired term January 2014 26. Consideration of nominating City Council Members to serve as representatives on the Concho Valley Council of Government General Assembly 27. Announcements and consideration of Future Agenda Items 28. Adjournment Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, Tuesday, March 12, 2013, at 5:00 P.M. /s/________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkCity Council Agenda Page 5 of 5 March 19, 2013
    • City of San AngeloMemo Date: February 20, 2013 To: Mayor and Council Members From: Ron Lewis, Construction and Facilities Maintenance Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Ron Lewis, 481.2773 Caption: Consent Adoption of a resolution awarding a contract for Pest Control Services between the City of San Angelo and Bug Express, and authorizing the Mayor and/or City Manager to execute said contract. The City of San Angelo posted RFB:CFM-01-13 on the COSA website and advertised twice in the San Angelo Standard Times Newspaper, and directly Summary: notified 13 vendors for Pest Control Services. Ten vendors were located in San Angelo. The bids were opened on February 1, 2013. Four vendors responded. Bug Express provided the best value for the City of San Angelo. The initial term of the contract is for three (3) years with two (2) options to extend for a period of one (1) year each. History: Construction and Facilities Maintenance and the Purchasing Department prepared RFB: CFM-01-13 for Pest Control Services. Several calls where made to current users of Bug Express. All had good reports to their service and one mentioned they were on a first name basis with their service person. They work well with scheduling and coordinating when having to gain access to large numbers of housing unit. Financial Impact: Total impact is $9,790.00 per year budgeted throughout several City department accounts. Departments paying annually will receive a 5% discount. Related Vision Item Financial Vision: Review contracted services on annual basis to ensure highest and best use of public funds. (if applicable): Other Information/ Staff recommends approval of the contract with Bug Express for Pest Control Recommendation: Services. Attachments: Resolution, Contract, RFB:CFM-01-13 Bid Tab Presentation: NA Publication: NA Reviewed by Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager Director: Approved by Legal: Adopted: 5/30/03 Revised: 6/21/10
    • CITY OF SAN ANGELO BID TAB CFM-01-13 PEST CONTROL SERVICE February 1, 2013 / 2:00pm Better Choice Bug Express Jims Pest Control Thrash Pest Control Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Facilities Frequency Frequency Per year Frequency Per year Frequency Per year Frequency Per year 1 City Hall Monthly $ 50.00 $ 600.00 $ 21.00 $ 252.00 $ 350.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00 2 Community Development Building Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 21.00 $ 252.00 $ 150.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00 3 Water Billing & Collection Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 17.00 $ 204.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00 4 Santa Fe Crossing Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 17.00 $ 204.00 $ 225.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00 5 Station 618 Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 155.00 $ 1,860.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00 6 Carl Ray Center Monthly $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 102.50 $ 1,230.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00 7 Southside Recreation Monthly $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 175.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00 8 Municipal Pool Monthly $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 102.50 $ 1,230.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00 9 Nature Center Monthly $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 102.50 $ 1,230.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.0010 Municipal Court Monthly $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 95.00 $ 1,140.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.0011 Wastewater Treatment Plant Quarterly $ 50.00 $ 200.00 $ 55.00 $ 220.00 $ 225.00 $ 900.00 $ 200.00 $ 800.0012 Police Dept Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 300.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.0013 Training Facility Monthly $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 45.00 $ 540.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.0014 Building / 505 S. Chadbourne Monthly $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.0015 Gun Range Quarterly $ 30.00 $ 120.00 $ 50.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 800.00 $ 150.00 $ 600.0016 McNease Convention Center Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 350.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.0017 City Auditorium Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 150.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,200.0018 Coliseum Monthly $ 35.00 $ 420.00 $ 40.00 $ 480.00 $ 375.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 200.00 $ 2,400.00 Every 3 weeks (17 billing19 Animal Shelter periods) $ 35.00 $ 595.00 $ 25.00 $ 425.00 $ 155.00 $ 2,635.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,700.00 Spring & summer every Mo./Fall-Winter every Other Mo20 Public Safety Communications (9 mos) $ 30.00 $ 270.00 $ 35.00 $ 315.00 $ 92.50 $ 832.50 $ 50.00 $ 450.0021 Central Fire Dept Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.0022 Training Center Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.0023 Station #2 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.0024 Station #3 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.0025 Station #4 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.0026 Station #5 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.0027 Station #6 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.0028 Station #7 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.0029 Station #8 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.0030 Water Distribution And Collection Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 22.00 $ 264.00 $ 152.50 $ 1,830.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.0031 Cemetery Office Quarterly $ 20.00 $ 80.00 $ 35.00 $ 140.00 $ 62.50 $ 250.00 $ 50.00 $ 200.0032 Parks Dept. Quarterly $ 20.00 $ 80.00 $ 35.00 $ 140.00 $ 125.00 $ 500.00 $ 100.00 $ 400.0033 Santa Fe Train Museum Quarterly $ 20.00 $ 80.00 $ 30.00 $ 120.00 $ 125.00 $ 500.00 $ 50.00 $ 200.0034 Emergency Operations Center Monthly $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 17.00 $ 204.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.0035 Ralph Chase State Services Center Monthly $ 25.00 $ 300.00 $ 25.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.0036 Texas Workforce Solutions Monthly $ 25.00 $ 300.00 $ 25.00 $ 300.00 $ 225.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.0037 Employee Health Clinic Monthly C:Usersbryan.kendrickDesktop03-19-1302 PUR CFM-01-13Bid $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 22.00 $ 264.00 $ 92.50 $ 1,110.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
    • CITY OF SAN ANGELO BID TAB CFM-01-13 PEST CONTROL SERVICE February 1, 2013 / 2:00pm Better Choice Bug Express Jims Pest Control Thrash Pest Control38 Airport Terminal Monthly $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 18.00 $ 216.00 $ 155.00 $ 1,860.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00 Semi-Monthly39 Control Tower (24 per year) $ 20.00 $ 480.00 $ 15.00 $ 360.00 $ 205.00 $ 4,920.00 $ 50.00 $ 1,200.00 Semi-Monthly40 Flight Services Station (24 per year) $ 20.00 $ 480.00 $ 15.00 $ 360.00 $ 305.00 $ 7,320.00 $ 50.00 $ 1,200.0041 Water Quality Lab Quarterly $20.00 $ 80.00 $25.00 $ 100.00 $102.50 $ 410.00 $50.00 $ 200.00 GRAND TOTAL $ 1,040.00 $ 10,415.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 9,790.00 $ 6,780.00 $ 74,507.50 $ 2,600.00 $ 25,250.00 Current number of certified pest control technicians: 2 10 2 5 none we have Annual in already placed Annual pay advance - 5% discounts in the 20% discount List any discounts available (annual pay, etc.): 10% off discount bid for annual pay Vendor Agrees to allow Piggy-Back Procurements Yes Yes Yes Yes Will you accept Credit Card Payments? Yes Yes n No If you accept Credit Card Payments, will you offer a discount? No No n/a n/a If so, how much and what are the terms? N/a n.a n/a n/a Invitation to Bids Mailed To: A&A Pest San Angelo, TX Hi-Tech Pest Defense San Angelo, TX A Ban Exterminators San Angelo, TX Orkin Pest Control Abilene, TX B Better Choice Pest Control Tom Bean, TX Terminix International San Angelo, TX Affordable Pest Control San Angelo, TX Pioneer Termite & Pest Control San Angelo, TX Bug Experts Pest Control San Angelo, TX Rex Pest Control San Angelo, TX Bug Express San Angelo, TX Rhino Pest Control Mertzon, TX Farmers Daughter Landscape San Angelo, TX C:Usersbryan.kendrickDesktop03-19-1302 PUR CFM-01-13Bid
    • City of San AngeloMemo Date: March 8, 2013 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director Subject: Consent Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Ricky Dickson, Interim Water Utilities Director, 657-4209 Caption: Consideration of approving a residential lease renewal with David and Kerry Persely, at Lot 104, Group Shady Point, 6678 Knickerbocker Road; and authorizing the Water Utilities Director to execute the same. Summary: The leaseholder’s current lease expires in 2043 and they would like to execute a new 40 year lease for financing purposes. History: Lease fees are current and there are no issues with the lease on this tract. Financial Impact: Current lease fees: 2013-2016 $450.00 2017-2043 Market Value New lease fees: 2013-2016 $540.00 2017-2053 Market Value Related Vision Item (if applicable): None. Other Information/Recommendation: It is recommended that the lease renewal be approved and the Water Utilities Director be authorized to execute the lease. Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Lease Renewal Agreement (Persely) Presentation: None. Publication: None. Reviewed by Service Area Director: Ricky Dickson, Interim Water Utilities Director March 8, 2013
    • LAKE NASWORTHY RESIDENTIAL LOT LEASE This lease is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF SAN ANGELO, aTexas municipal corporation, ("Lessor"), whose address is 72 W. College Avenue, San Angelo,Tom Green County, Texas 76903, and David and wife, Kerry Persely, whose address is 6678Knickerbocker Road, San Angelo, Texas 76904 ("Lessee"). I. DEMISE OF LEASED PREMISES1.1 In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and agreements set forth in thislease, Lessor hereby demises and leases to Lessee, and Lessee hereby accepts and leases fromLessor, the following described real property (hereinafter called "leased premises") situated inSan Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas: Lot 104, Group Shady Point, Lake Nasworthy Addition, according to the map or plat of said Lake Nasworthy Campsites in the custody of the Water Utilities Department of the City of San Angelo (also commonly known as 6678 Knickerbocker Road). II. TERM, FEES AND RENT FIXED COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION DATE2.1 This lease is granted for a period of forty (40) years having an effective date beginningMarch 1, 2013 and ending April 30, 2053, in consideration of the initial payment of $150.00,which payment includes the granting fee, receipt of which payment is hereby acknowledged, andthe further consideration of Lessees payment of future annual rent in accordance withsubsequent paragraphs hereof and Lessees compliance with the stipulations and conditionshereinafter set forth. TIME AND MANNER OF PAYMENT2.2 Lessee shall pay annual rent to Lessor at the San Angelo Water Utilities Department, 72W. College Avenue, San Angelo, Texas, 76903, or at such other place as Lessor may from timeto time designate by written notice to Lessee. Such rent shall be paid annually on or before July 1during the term of this lease in accordance with the following schedule: Dates Annual Rent For the Years 2013 Through 2016 $540.00 For the Years 2017 Through 2052 * Market Value 1
    • * Annual rent shall be the appraised market value of the leased premises multiplied by a factor of0.08. Such appraised market value shall be determined and adjusted in accordance withapplicable City ordinances in effect at the time of execution of this lease. DELINQUENT PAYMENTS2.3 Lessee shall pay to Lessor a late charge or interest for any rent received by Lessor afterthe date that the rent is due in accordance with established ordinances, provided however, thatthis provision for late charges or interest shall not be construed as a waiver of the right of Lessorto terminate this lease at its option as authorized herein. HOLD OVER2.4 Any holding over by Lessee of the herein leased premises after the expiration of thislease shall operate and be construed only as a tenancy from month to month, terminable at thewill of Lessor. III. DEBTS RELATED TO LEASED PREMISES UTILITIES3.1 Any utility charges shall be paid in full by Lessee when due. Failure to pay suchcharges may be deemed a default at the option of Lessor. TAXES3.2 It is further understood and agreed that Lessee shall pay and discharge all taxes, generaland special assessments, and other charges of every description which during the term of thislease may be levied on or assessed against the leased premises and all interest therein and allimprovements and other property thereon, whether belonging to Lessor or Leaser to which eitherof them may become liable. Lessee shall pay all such taxes, charges, and assessments to thepublic officer charged with the collection thereof not less than fifteen (15) days before the sameshall become delinquent, and Lessee agrees to indemnify and save harmless Lessor from all suchtaxes, charges and assessments. Failure to pay such taxes and special assessments as providedherein may be deemed a default at the option of Lessor. WATER, SEWAGE, PAVING IMPROVEMENTS3.3 In the event the Lessor lays sewer and/or water lines on, adjacent to or in the vicinity ofthe leased premises, Lessee agrees to pay the pro rata front-foot cost of laying said line or linesas established by and in accordance with city policies then in existence.3.4 Lessee expressly agrees that if city water or sewer lines are ever located within 200 feetof the leased premises, Lessee will tie on to such service at its own expense at the priceestablished for that specific Lake Nasworthy area. 2
    • 3.5 In the event the Lessor institutes a paving program abutting the leased premises, Lesseeshall pay his pro rata share of paving, curb and gutter costs pursuant to prevailing city policies. IV. RULES AND REGULATIONS4.1 The rules and regulations provided in those certain ordinances of the City Council of theCity of San Angelo, ("Council"), adopted April 2, 1951, and now known as the LakeNasworthy-Twin Buttes Ordinances and any and all subsequent amendments adopted heretoforeor hereafter are expressly incorporated herein by reference as terms and conditions of this lease.This lease is expressly made subject to any ordinances adopted in the future by the Council forthe regulation of Lake Nasworthy and surrounding property, including but not limited to, safety,sanitation, and ecological requirements. This lease will be managed by the Water UtilitiesDepartment of the City of San Angelo subject to the approval of the Council. V. USE OF LEASED PREMISES CONSTRUCTION BY LESSEE5.1 The premises shall be used only for a single family residence and lawful uses incidentalthereto, and in this connection the following shall be applicable: a. No structure shall be constructed in excess of two stories in height. b. No dwelling or residence shall be located nearer than 75 feet to the 1,872.2 foot elevation line. c. No housetrailer, shack, tent, or temporary residence of any type shall be permitted on the leased premises, and no garage or other accessory building shall be used as a residence. d. All structures shall have a foundation that complies with Lessors building code. e. No outside toilets shall be constructed or maintained on leased premises, and all plumbing shall be connected with a sanitary sewer or with a septic tank which complies in all respects to all state, county and city sanitation regulations and requirements. No septic tank shall be placed, constructed, or maintained nearer than 75 feet to the 1,872.2 foot elevation line nor nearer than five (5) feet to any property line. All wastewater facilities shall conform to all of the Citys wastewater ordinances, where applicable. No sewer or drain shall empty into the lake or be constructed so as to flow or wash into the lake. No concrete storm drains may be constructed without the prior approval of the Water Utilities Department, Zoning Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and/or Council, as applicable. f. No structure shall be constructed closer than five (5) feet to any property line. 3
    • g. No trees may be removed from the leased premises without the prior written consent of the Water Utilities Director. h. No improvements or construction work of any kind, including but not limited to, houses, boathouses, piers, pump houses, water wells, storage buildings, fences, excavations, fills, and other types of structures or improvements, shall be built or performed on leased premises without prior approval of the Water Utilities Department, Zoning Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and/or Council, as applicable. i. Lessee agrees to comply with all provisions of the Official Code of the City of San Angelo ("Code"), as such now exists or may hereafter be amended including, but not limited to, those provisions regarding building permits and permit fees; inspections and fees therefore; building, plumbing, electrical, and fire standards or requirements; and the regulation of septic tanks. j. After any permit is granted, Lessee expressly agrees that all improvements or construction work shall be built or performed in strict compliance with the terms of the permit and approval granted, that construction shall commence within six (6) months following the date of the permit, and that all construction shall be completed within one (1) year of the date of the permit. k. Lessee may request from the Council a variance or deviation from any term or condition contained herein. l. The Council, prior to granting any extension of an existing lease or a new lease covering the leased premises shall have the right to review the leased premises and improvements thereon and submit in writing to the Lessee the requirements, if any, which shall attach to and become a part of this lease, necessary for compliance with the above-mentioned provisions of the Code. Failure of the Lessee to abide by and comply with said requirements may be deemd a default at the option of Lessor. RESERVATIONS AND EASEMENTS5.2 Lessor, its agents or assigns, reserves the privilege and right at any time to execute anddeliver valid oil, gas and other mineral leases upon the leased premises, and valid right-of-wayeasements for gas, oil, water, or wastewater pipelines, telephone, telegraph or electric poletransmission lines on said premises, or any part thereof, and in such event this lease shall besubject and subordinate to the rights, terms and privileges of any such oil, gas and other mineralleases or such easements as may have been executed heretofore or hereafter by Lessor, its agentsor assigns. An easement across leased premises is hereby retained by Lessor for the purpose oflaying sewer and water lines and/or for necessary rights-of-way for roads, alleys or otherthroughways. VI. ENCUMBRANCE OF LEASEHOLD ESTATE ENCUMBERING LEASEHOLD INTEREST ONLY 4
    • 6.1 Lessee shall not have the right to encumber the fee simple, but Lessee may requestLessors written consent (pursuant to article XII of this lease) to encumber the leasehold estate,personal property or improvements made by Lessee which may be removed from the realtywithout injury to the realty; provided however, that no mortgagee nor anyone who claims by,through or under such mortgage or deed of trust shall, by virtue of such mortgage or deed trust,acquire any greater or more extended rights than Lessee has under this lease but such mortgageor deed of trust shall be in every respect subject, subservient and subordinate to all of theconditions, provisions, requirements, covenants and obligations of this lease. The mortgageeunder any such deed of trust or mortgage shall have the right to assume this lease and perform itsterms and conditions to protect itself. NOTICES TO LENDER6.2 Any lender or mortgagee may notify Lessor in writing that a mortgage or deed of trusthas been given and executed by Lessee and furnish Lessor with the address to which it desirescopies of notices to be mailed. Lessor agrees to mail to lender or mortgagee or its designatedagent or representative, at the address given, a copy of any notice which Lessor gives, mails, orserves on Lessee under the terms of this lease after receipt of such a notice from the lender ormortgagee. VII. CONDITION OF PREMISES NO WARRANTY7.1 LESSOR GIVES NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THECONDITION OF THE LEASED PREMISES OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS THEREON,INCLUDING WARRANTY OF HABITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE. AVAILABILITY AND USE OF LAKE WATER7.2 Lessor in no way guarantees the accessibility of water to the leased premises nor the levelof water in Lake Nasworthy. Lessee can use water from the lake, river, and/or wells on the premises for domesticpurposes and water of existing trees and shrubs; but no water will be removed from the premises.Use of water for irrigation is expressly prohibited. Lessee shall use water in a conservativemanner, and any abusive use of water shall be grounds for denying the use of water to theLessee. Lessee shall pay the applicable water use charge as set by the Lessor, for water or rawwater usage, as the case may be. VIII. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE LESSEES DUTY TO REPAIR AND MAINTAIN 5
    • 8.1 Lessee agrees to keep and maintain any and all structures erected or caused to be erectedor placed on the leased premises in good and tenantable condition, to maintain its appearance,and to landscape and keep said premises cleared of all objectionable matter, things, andvegetation. Leased premises shall not be used for the outside storage of usable materials forunreasonable lengths of time. In the event Lessee shall fail to maintain leased premises in amanner acceptable to Lessor, after notice to Lessee as prescribed by city ordinance, the Lessorshall cause leased premises to be cleaned, cleared, and mowed. Lessee expressly authorizes thecost of any such clearing, cleaning, and mowing to be billed to it or added to the next annualrental payment, with interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum beginning thirty (30)days from the date on which the work was completed, and continuing until such cost is paid infull. DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION8.2 The parties hereto acknowledge that the leased premises are within an area subject tooverflow and flooding and it is expressly agreed between the parties that neither Lessor nor anyof its agents or employees shall be liable to Lessee for any damages caused in any manner,negligent or otherwise, by high water or floods at Lake Nasworthy, nor by the rivers or creekswhich serve as its sources of supply or diversion channels, nor by reason of any work deemednecessary in Lessors sole judgment in the maintenance of said Lake and sources of supply ordiversion channels and all damages occasioned thereby are hereby waived, and when Lessor (orany agent thereof) deems it necessary to enter on the leased premises for any of the abovepurposes, its judgment shall be conclusive. IX. SUSPENSION OF PRIVILEGES HEALTH MATTERS9.1 It is expressly understood and agreed that Lessor may at any time, without notice toLessee or any mortgagee, suspend or revoke any and all privileges granted herein for such lengthof time as in its sole judgment is necessary for the purpose of suppressing or arresting anepidemic of any contagious or infectious disease, or when, in its sole judgment, any suspensionof privileges is necessary to protect the health of the water consumers of San Angelo, Texas. Inthe event privileges are suspended by Lessor, rent shall be prorated; and if the lease is revoked,Lessor shall pay Lessee an amount equal to the market value of any structures or improvementshereto made or erected on leased premises in compliance with the terms of this lease. PUBLIC PURPOSES9.2 If Lessor shall deem that leased premises are required for any public purpose or thatcondemnation is necessary, Lessor shall have the right to terminate this lease by giving ninety(90) days written notice of such termination to Lessee and any mortgagee who has notified theWater Utilities Department of its lien and its address for notice purposes; and Lessee agrees topromptly deliver possession of leased premises to Lessor; and this lease shall terminate upon theexpiration of ninety (90)days after the date of such notice; and in such event Lessor shall pay 6
    • Lessee an amount equal to the market value of any structures or improvements hereto made orerected on leased premises in compliance with the terms of this lease. X. RELEASE10.1 Lessee expressly releases Lessor, its officers, agents, and employees from any and allclaims for damages of any kind by reason of the condition of the premises hereby leased, or anyimprovements thereon or any damages incurred in the enjoyment or exercise of the privilegesgranted hereunder, or for damage to its person or property caused by the opening of the gates atNasworthy Dam, the lowering of the normal water elevation in the lake, or due to flood or highwater, or any fluctuating water levels which may arise in the use and operation of LakeNasworthy, or in the joint use and operation of Lake Nasworthy, San Angelo Reservoir, andTwin Buttes Reservoir for the purposes of recreation, irrigation, and water supply, or for anyother purpose. XI. INDEMNIFICATION11.1 LESSEE FURTHER AGREES FOR LESSEE AND LESSEE’SSUCCESORS ININTEREST TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD LESSOR, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, ANDEMPLOYEES, FREE AND HARMLESS FROM ANY CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES ORINJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY, OR ANY LIABILITYINCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE EXERCISE OF THE PRIVILEGES CONFERRED BYTHIS LEASE, AND AGREES TO REIMBURSE LESSOR FOR ANY EXPENSESINCURRED IN THE DEFENSE OF ANY SUCH CLAIM, INCLUDING REASONABLEATTORNEYS FEES AND COURT COSTS ACTUALLY INCURRED. NOTHING HEREINSHALL REQUIRE THE INDEMNIFYING PARTY TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND ORHOLDHARMLESS ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY FOR THE INDEMNIFIED PARTY’SOWN GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT. THIS INDEMNIFICATIONSHALL SURVIVE THE TERM OF THIS LEASE AS LONG AS ANY LIABILITY COULDBE ASSERTED. XII. TRANSFER, ASSIGNMENT, AND SUBLETTING12.1 Lessee may not transfer or assign the leased premises, in whole or in part, without theprior written consent of the Lessor, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Lesseemay not sublet the leased premises, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of theLessor. Any such transfer, assignment or sublease shall be evidenced in writing, properlyexecuted and acknowledged by both parties thereto; a copy shall be delivered to Lessor and theoriginal shall be recorded in the office of the County Clerk of Tom Green County, Texas. It isagreed, however, that each such transfer, assignment or sublease shall bind the transferee,assignee or sublessee to the obligations of Lessee to Lessor as set forth in this lease and shall notrelease Lessee from Lessees obligations under the lease. XIII. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES DEFAULT 7
    • 13.1 (a) Any breach of this lease by Lessee, other than the non-payment of rent, may result inirreparable damage to Lessor for which Lessor will not have an adequate remedy at law. IfLessee should default with respect to any of its obligations hereunder except with respect to thenon-payment of rent, and should fail within 60 days after written notice of such default from theLessor to cure such default, then Lessee agrees that that Lessor shall be entitled to immediatelyseek relief by action or proceeding at law for damages, for specific performance and injunction,without any requirement to post a bond or other security. (b) In addition to, and independent of, the provisions of subsection (a), above, shouldLessee violate any provision of this Lease, other than the non-payment of rent, and fail or refuseto cure such violation within 60 days after written notice of such default from Lessor, thenLessor or Lessor’s agents may enter the premises as reasonably necessary to perform the workrequired as determined by Lessor to cure the default and the costs thereof shall be deemed to beadditional rent, immediately due and payable upon written notice to Lessee of the sum ofexpenses, costs, and fees so incurred by Lessor, including an assessment for the cost related toLessor’s employee time in curing the default, if any. LESSEE HEREBY WAIVES ANYCLAIM FOR TRESSPASS OR DAMAGES RELATING TO LESSOR OR LESSOR’SAGENTS OR EMPLOYEES ENTRY ONTO THE LEASEHOLD PREMISES PURSUANT TOTHE PROVSIONS OF THIS LEASE. (c) A breach of this lease by Lessee for non-payment of rent shall result in termination ofthis lease should Lessee within 60 days after written notice of default setting forth the amountpast due fail to cure such default by making payment of the full amount due Lessor. POSSESSION13.2 Lessee agrees at the termination of this lease to deliver possession peacefully to theLessor or its agents or employees; and if it fails to give peaceful possession, Lessor may takeforceful possession of said premises and eject all parties therefrom without being guilty oftrespass; and all damages occasioned thereby are hereby waived. REMOVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS13.3 All buildings and other improvements placed on the property by Lessee (except trees,shrubs, flowers and plants) which may be removed without injury to the realty shall remain theproperty of Lessee. It is understood and agreed, however, that buildings and improvements shallbe held by the Lessor until all rentals due Lessor by Lessee shall have been paid, and should anyamount remain unpaid for more than thirty (30) days after termination of this lease, the Lessorshall have the right to sell such buildings and improvements and apply the proceeds to theamount due Lessor, with interest at the annual rate of ten percent (10%), and to any costsincident to the sale, and pay the balance remaining, if any, to Lessee. All property remaining onthe premises after the expiration of ninety (90) days following the termination of this lease,however terminated, shall be deemed abandoned by Lessee and shall become the property ofLessor. 8
    • OTHER REMEDIES13.4 (a) Any termination of this lease shall not relieve Lessee from the payment of any sum orsums that are due and payable to Lessor under the lease, or any claim for damages then orpreviously accruing against Lessee under this lease, and any such termination shall not preventLessor from enforcing the payment of any such sum or sums or claim for damages by anyremedy provided for by law, or from recovering damages from Lessee for any default under thelease. All rights, options, and remedies of Lessor contained in this lease shall be construed andheld to be cumulative, and no one of them shall be exclusive of the other, and Lessor shall havethe right to pursue any one or all of such remedies or any other remedy or relief which may beprovided by law, whether or not stated in this lease. No waiver by Lessor of a breach of any ofthe covenants, conditions, or restrictions of this lease shall be construed or held to be a waiver ofany succeeding or preceding breach of the same or any other covenant, condition, or restrictioncontained in this lease. (b) The remedies provided herein shall not be exclusive of other remedies. A failure bythe Lessor to take action on any past violation shall not constitute a waiver of the Lessor’s rightto take action on any subsequent violation. XIV. MISCELLANEOUS RELATIONSHIP OF LESSOR AND LESSEE14.1 The relationship between Lessor and Lessee at all times shall remain solely that oflandlord and tenant and shall not be deemed a partnership or joint venture. PARTIES BOUND14.2 This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties of the leaseand their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors andassigns. HEADINGS14.3 The paragraph headings contained herein are for convenience and reference and are notintended to define, extend or limit the scope of any provisions of this lease. SUPERSEDES PRIOR AGREEMENTS14.4 If this lease replaces another lease, all prior agreements are superseded by this lease. ENTIRE AGREEMENT/AMENDMENTS14.5 This lease constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and Lessor is not boundby any agreement, condition or stipulation, understanding or representation made by any of 9
    • Lessor’s agents not contained herein. No amendment to this lease shall be effective unless suchis in writing and signed by both parties. VIOLATIONS OF LEASE14.6 IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES THATTHE VIOLATION OF ANY TERM, STIPULATION, CONDITION, OR COVENANT,SHALL ENTITLE THE LESSOR, AT ITS OPTION, TO TERMINATE THIS LEASE.FAILURE TO EXERCISE SUCH OPTION AT ANY TIME SHALL NEVER BECONSTRUED AS A WAIVER OF ANY CONDITION OF THIS LEASE. TEXAS LAW TO APPLY14.7 The parties hereby agree that Texas law will control the interpretation or enforcement ofthis lease. This lease has been executed in Texas, and all obligations hereunder are performablein Tom Green County, Texas. INVALID OR ILLEGAL PROVISIONS14.8 If any provision of this lease is held invalid as to any person or set of circumstances, suchholding shall not affect the validity of any remaining provision of this lease or any provision’sapplication to other persons not similarly situated or to other circumstances. REIMBURSEMENT OF LESSOR’S EXPENSES14.9 Lessee shall pay on demand all of Lessor’s expenses including, but not limited to,attorney’s fees and court costs incurred in enforcing any of Lessee’s obligations under this lease,which include, but are not limited to, collection of rental fees and collection of utility payments,taxes and other legitimate assessments. NOTICES14.9 All notices concerning this lease shall be in writing and delivered to the parties at theaddresses below: LESSEE: David and Kerry Persely 6678 Knickerbocker Road San Angelo, Texas 76904 LESSOR: City of San Angelo Attn: Water Utilities Director 72 W. College Avenue San Angelo, Texas 76903 [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] 10
    • EXECUTED in duplicate originals on the _____day of _____________________, 2013by: LESSEE David Persely Kerry PerselySTATE OF TEXAS §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____day of ________________,2013 by David and Kerry Persely. Notary Public, State of Texas CITY OF SAN ANGELO, LESSOR BY: RICKY DICKSON Water Utilities DepartmentSTATE OF TEXAS §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____day of ________________,2012, by Ricky Dickson, Interim Director of Water Utilities of the City of San Angelo, a Texashome rule municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public, State of Texas 11
    • City of San AngeloMemo Date: March 4, 2013 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Cindy M. Preas, Real Estate Administrator (657-4407) Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Diana Farris, Property Specialist (657-4407) Caption: Consent Item Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo authorizing the mayor to execute a tax-resale (quitclaim) deed conveying all right, title and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the tax foreclosure judgment: 1944 & 1948 Magnolia Street, (Gonzalez), Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale, $1,000, Suit No.B99-0081-T 207 E Avenue L, (Perez), E 50’ x 238’ of a 1 acre Tract, Fisher Miller, $750, Suit No.TAX89-0388B 725 Hughes Street, (Salinas), Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell, $950, Suit No. B-03-0087-T 816 Volney, (Salinas) Portion of Lots 6-8, Block 28, Miles, 1,500, Suit No. B-05-0192-T 111 E 13th Street, (Salinas), Lot 7, Block 57, Miles, ($1,200) Suit No. B-97-0170-T th 329 13 Street, (Salinas), Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, $750, Suit No.TAX90-0083B 1916 Shelton, (Sanchez), S ½ of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres, $2,500, Suit No.B-00- 0043-T Summary: The subject properties were auctioned at Sheriff’s Sale. No offers were received causing subject properties to be stuck-off to the City, as Trustee for itself and the other taxing entities. History: The attached Property Analysis reflects amounts of delinquent taxes, accrued penalties, interest, attorney fees and costs for delinquent years of, together with additional penalties and interest at the rates prescribed by Chapter 33, Texas Property Tax Code. Financial Impact: Upon approval: (1) The City will retain a $500 Administration fee; (2) The balance will be distributed according to the judgment on the Sheriff’s Return; and (3) Property will be reinstated back onto tax roll. Related Vision Item Financial Vision – Examine liquidation of unused or underperforming city-owned properties (if applicable): Neighborhood Vision – Attract reinvestment Other Information/ Staff recommends approval. Recommendation: Attachments: Property Analysis, Resolution, Tax-Resale Deed and Property Location Map Adopted: 5/30/03 Revised: 6/21/10
    • Presentation: N/APublication: N/AReviewed by Lysia H. Bowling, City AttorneyDirector:Approved by Legal:
    • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A TAX-RESALE (QUITCLAIM) DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, AND ALL OTHER TAXING UNITS INTERESTED IN THE TAX FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT WHEREAS, by Sheriff’s Sale, the properties described below were struck-off to the City ofSan Angelo, Trustee, pursuant to delinquent tax foreclosure decrees of the 119th and 340thJudicial Districts, Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, offers have been made for the purchase of said properties pursuant to Section34.05, Texas Tax Code Ann.(Vernon, 1982); and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO that its Mayor, Alvin New, is hereby authorized to execute a Tax-Resale(quitclaim) Deed conveying the following described real properties to the following as specifiedbelow, all of the right, title, and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing unitsinterested in the tax foreclosure judgment, located in San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas:Conveying to:CARLOS GONZALEZ, a single person; ($1,000): Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof, recorded in Volume 1, Page 86, Plat Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #02-12400-0002-001-00 #02-12400-0002-002-00GILBERT PEREZ, JR., a single person; ($750): The East 50’ x 238’ of a 1.00 acre Tract described in Volume 39, Page 621, Deed Records, said East 50’ being described in Volume 361, Page 196, Deed of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #38-00205-0013-000-00RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property; ($1,200): Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed recorded in Volume 648, Page 622, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #07-19800-0002-008-00RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property; ($1,200): Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 85, Page 576, Deed Records, Tom Green County, Texas. Account #19-34200-0057-007-00
    • RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property; ($1,500): A portion of Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 28, Miles Addition, an addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed dated March 20, 1974 from Donald Nelson Holley, et ux. To George Jones, Sr., et ux., in Volume 611, Page 583, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #18-34200-0028-009-00RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property; ($750): Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, being more particularly described in Volume 251, Page 235, Deed Records of Tom Green, Texas. Account #21-38600-0002-002-00MARIA ROSA SANCHEZ, a single person, and LILLIANA SANCHEZ, a single person;($2,500): The South one-half of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 288, Page 55, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #15-28100-0003-029-00APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO _______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:______________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Content: Approved As to Form:______________________________ ______________________________Cindy M. Preas, Real Estate Administrator Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof, recorded in Volume 1, Page 86, Plat Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: B99-0081-TLocation: 1944 & 1948 Magnolia StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 50 x 130City of San Angelo vs. J.F. Kite, Addie Kite, Mrs. N.E. Hicks Account #1391Tax ID Number: #02-12400-0002-001-00 #02-12400-0002-002-00Tax Warrant Date: October 26, 1999Date of Sheriffs Sale: December 7, 1999Sheriffs Deed Recorded: January 6, 2000 Years Held in Trust 13 YRSAdjudge Value: $ 1,800.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment NoAmount of Offer: $ 1,000.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00Maintenance Fee $ 1,820.00 100.00% $ 500.00 $ 500.00District Clerk $ - 0.00% $ -Sheriffs Fee $ - 0.00% $ -Attorney Fee $ - 0.00% $ -Municipal Liens $ - $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00Taxes $ - $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00Total $2,320.00 $ - $500.00 100.00% $ 500.00 $1,000.00Actual Total Amt Due $2,320.00Amount Remaining $ 500.00 All costs according to the Tax Warrant have been perviously paid. Offer will satisfy a portion of the Maintenance costs.
    • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove orstrike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record inthe public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District 72 West College Avenue San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Grantee: CARLOS GONZALEZ, a single person 725 Amberton Parkway San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof, recorded in Volume 1, Page 86, Plat Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #02-12400-0002-001-00 #02-12400-0002-002-00 Tax Warrant: Tax Warrant for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on October 26, 1999 in Suit No. B-99-0081-T by the 340th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Tax Warrant — by Sheriff’s Deed dated January 5, 2000, and recorded in Volume 751, Page 622, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Tax Warrant, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in
    • which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that wasnot extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date ofthe sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose. Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:
    • E 50 x 238 of a 1 acre tract, Fisher & MillerAddition207 E Avenue L 50 x 238Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Tue Dec 20 2011 04:46:45 PM.
    • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: The East 50’ x 238’ of a 1.00 acre Tract out of Fisher & Miller, described in Volume 39, Page 621, Deed Records, said East 50’ being described in Volume 361, Page 196, Deed of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: TAX89-0388bLocation: 207 E Avenue LParcel Size/Dimensions: 50 x 238City of San Angelo vs. Balente Martinez a/k/a Valente Martinez Account #1448Tax ID Number: #38-00205-0013-000-00Judgment Date: October 14, 1992Date of Sheriffs Sale: August 1, 1995Sheriffs Deed Recorded: October 25, 1995 Years Held in Trust 18 YRSAdjudge Value: $ 4,375.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment NoAmount of Offer: $ 750.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00Maintenance Fee 0.00% $ -District Clerk $ 131.00 21.84% $ 54.59 $ 54.59Sheriffs Fee $ 156.93 26.16% $ 65.40 $ 65.40Attorney Fee $ 311.98 52.00% $ 130.01 $ 130.01Municipal Liens $ - $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00Taxes $ - $3,775.09 0.00% $0.00 $0.00Total $500.00 $3,775.09 $500.00 100.00% $ 250.00 $750.00Actual Total Amt Due $4,275.09 $ 599.91Amount Remaining $ 250.00 Offer will satisfy all costs according to the Judgment.
    • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove orstrike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record inthe public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District 72 West College Avenue San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Grantee: GILBERT PEREZ, JR, a single person 712 Era Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76905 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): The East 50’ x 238’ of a 1.00 acre Tract described in Volume 39, Page 621, Deed Records, said East 50’ being described in Volume 361, Page 196, Deed of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #38-00205-0013-000-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on October 14, 1992 in Suit No. TAX89-0388-B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated September 20, 1995, and recorded in Volume 502, Page 55, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was
    • not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date ofthe sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose. Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:
    • 725 Hughes Street, Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition 60 x 115March 5, 2013 1:1,349 0 0.01 0.02 0.04 mi Zip Codes 0 0.0175 0.035 0.07 km City Address Points Copyright:© 2013 ESRI, NAVTEQ, DeLorme Pending City Addresses
    • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed recorded in Volume 648, Page 622, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: B-03-0087-TLocation: 725 Hughes StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 52 x 86City of San Angelo vs. John D. Northcutt Account #6883Tax ID Number: #07-19800-0002-008-00Judgment Date: January 18, 2005Date of Sheriffs Sale: April 4, 2006Sheriffs Deed Recorded: April 11, 2006 Years Held in Trust 7 YRSAdjudge Value: $ 2,100.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment NoAmount of Offer: $ 1,200.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00Maintenance Fee $ 980.00 0.00% $ -District Clerk $236.00 $236.00 0.00% $236.00Sheriffs Fee $100.00 $100.00 0.00% $100.00Attorney Fee $332.00 $332.00 0.00% $332.00Municipal Liens $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00Taxes $1,778.00 100.00% $32.00 $32.00Total $2,148.00 $ 1,778.00 $1,168.00 100.00% $ 32.00 $1,200.00Actual Total Amt Due $3,926.00Amount Remaining $ 32.00 Offer will satisfy all court costs and a small portion of the Taxes.
    • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove orstrike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record inthe public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District 72 West College Avenue San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Grantee: RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property 2107 Greenwood San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed recorded in Volume 648, Page 622, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #07-19800-0002-008-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on January 18, 2005 in Suit No. B-03-0087-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated April 11, 2006, and recorded in Instrument Number 609008, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in
    • which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that wasnot extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date ofthe sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose. Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:
    • 816 Volney Street, A Portion of Lots 6,7 & 8 , Block 28, Miles Addition 40 x 120March 5, 2013 1:2,699 0 0.0225 0.045 0.09 mi City Address Points County Address Points Parcels Abandonments Approved 0 0.035 0.07 0.14 km Pending City Addresses Pending County Addresses Platted Lot Line Labels Abandonments Denied Copyright:© 2013 ESRI, NAVTEQ, DeLorme Retired City Addresses Retired County Addresses Platted Lot Lines Abandonments Expired
    • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: A portion of Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 28, Miles Addition, an addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed dated March 20, 1974 from Donald Nelson Holley, et ux. to George Jones, Sr., et ux., in Volume 611, Page 583, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: B-05-0192-TLocation: 816 Volney StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 40 x 120City of San Angelo vs. Joseph Jones Acct-Unknown Lula B. Jones Acct #3835 Sylvia A. Jenkins Acct #1365Tax ID Number: #18-34200-0028-009-00Judgment Date: August 7, 2009Date of Sheriffs Sale: November 3, 2009Sheriffs Deed Recorded: November 23, 2009 Years Held in Trust 4 YRSAdjudge Value: $ 3,000.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment NoAmount of Offer: $ 1,900.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00Maintenance Fee $ 560.00 $0.00 100.00% $ 402.00 $ 402.00District Clerk $ 533.00 $ 533.00 0.00% $533.00Sheriffs Fee $ 100.00 $ 100.00 0.00% $100.00Attorney Fee $ 365.00 $ 365.00 0.00% $365.00Municipal Liens $981.22 0.00% $0.00 $0.00Taxes $6,101.42 0.00% $0.00 $0.00Total $1,060.00 $ 8,080.64 $1,498.00 100.00% $ 402.00 $1,900.00Actual Total Amt Due $9,140.64Amount Remaining $ 402.00 Offer will satisfy all court cost according to the Judgment.
    • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove orstrike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record inthe public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District 72 West College Avenue San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Grantee: RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property 2107 Greenwood San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): A portion of Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 28, Miles Addition, an addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed dated March 20, 1974 from Donald Nelson Holley, et ux. To George Jones, Sr., et ux., in Volume 611, Page 583, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #18-34200-0028-009-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on August 7, 2009 in Suit No. B-05-0192-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated November 20, 2009, and recorded in Instrument Number 678726, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms
    • of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year inwhich the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that wasnot extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date ofthe sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose. Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:
    • 111 E 13th Street, Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition 50 x 100March 5, 2013 1:1,349 0 0.01 0.02 0.04 mi Zip Codes 0 0.0175 0.035 0.07 km City Address Points Copyright:© 2013 ESRI, NAVTEQ, DeLorme Pending City Addresses
    • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 85, Page 576, Deed Records, Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: B-97-0170-TLocation: 111 E 13th StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 50 x 100City of San Angelo vs. Frank B. Snodgrass, Jr. Account #1692Tax ID Number: #19-34200-0057-007-00Judgment Date: July 7, 1999Date of Sheriffs Sale: March 5, 2002Sheriffs Deed Recorded: March 25, 2002 Years Held in Trust 11 YRSAdjudge Value: $ 3,000.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment NoAmount of Offer: $ 1,200.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00Maintenance Fee $ 1,540.00 $0.00 100.00% $ 317.00 $ 317.00District Clerk $ 103.00 $ 103.00 0.00% $103.00Sheriffs Fee $ 40.00 $ 40.00 0.00% $40.00Attorney Fee $ 240.00 $ 240.00 0.00% $240.00Municipal Liens $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00Taxes $3,298.48 0.00% $0.00 $0.00Total $2,040.00 $ 3,681.48 $883.00 100.00% $ 317.00 $1,200.00Actual Total Amt Due $5,721.48Amount Remaining $ 317.00 Offer will satisfy all court cost according to the Judgment.
    • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove orstrike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record inthe public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District 72 West College Avenue San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Grantee: RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property 2107 Greenwood San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 85, Page 576, Deed Records, Tom Green County, Texas. Account #19-34200-0057-007-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on July 7, 1999 in Suit No. B-97-0170-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated March 25, 2002, and recorded in Volume 902, Page 534, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was
    • not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date ofthe sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose. Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:
    • Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place Addition329 E 13th St 52 x 86Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Thu Dec 22 2011 09:08:38 AM.
    • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, being more particularly described in Volume 251, Page 235, Deed Records of Tom Green, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: TAX90-0083BLocation: 329 13th StreetParcel Size/Dimensions: 52 x 86City of San Angelo vs. Roy L. Mayo Account #918Tax ID Number: 21-38600-0002-002-00Judgment Date: June 16, 1993Date of Sheriffs Sale: February 4, 1997Sheriffs Deed Recorded: February 21, 1997 Years Held in Trust 16 YRSAdjudge Value: $ 4,269.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment NoAmount of Offer: $ 750.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00Maintenance Fee $ 2,240.00 $0.00 100.00% $ 250.00 $ 250.00District Clerk $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00Sheriffs Fee $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00Attorney Fee $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00Municipal Liens $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00Taxes $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00Total $2,740.00 $ - $500.00 100.00% $ 250.00 $750.00Actual Total Amt Due $2,740.00Amount Remaining $ 250.00 Offer will satisfy a portion of the fees. No costs are due.
    • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove orstrike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record inthe public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District 72 West College Avenue San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Grantee: RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property 2107 Greenwood San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, being more particularly described in Volume 251, Page 235, Deed Records of Tom Green, Texas. Account #21-38600-0002-002-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on June 16, 1993 in Suit No. TAX90-0083B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated February 17, 1997, and recorded in Volume 570, Page 84, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was
    • not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date ofthe sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose. Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:
    • 1916 Shleton St. S 1/2 of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres 87 x 250March 7, 2013 1:2,699 0 0.0225 0.045 0.09 mi City Address Points 0 0.035 0.07 0.14 km Pending City Addresses Copyright:© 2013 ESRI, NAVTEQ, DeLorme Retired City Addresses County Address Points
    • PROPERTY ANALYSIS For Tax Resale PropertyLegal Description: The South one-half of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 288, Page 55, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.Improved/Unimproved UnimprovedTax Suit Number: B-00-0043-TLocation: 1916 SheltonParcel Size/Dimensions: 87 x 250City of San Angelo vs. Eddie May Brown Account #5610 and R.J. Brown Account #8515Tax ID Number: #15-28100-0003-029-00Judgment Date: January 6, 2004Date of Sheriffs Sale: November 1, 2011Sheriffs Deed Recorded: November 17, 2011 Years Held in Trust 1 YRAdjudge Value: $ 5,200.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment NoAmount of Offer: $ 2,500.00 Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations DistributedAdministration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00Maintenance Fee $ 350.00 0.00% $ -District Clerk $34.00 $34.00 0.00% $ - $ -Sheriffs Fee $100.00 $100.00 0.00% $ - $ -Attorney Fee $208.00 $208.00 0.00% $ - $ -Municipal Liens $ - $794.06 10.82% $141.50 $141.50Taxes $ - $6,546.19 89.18% $1,166.50 $1,166.50Total $1,192.00 $7,340.25 $842.00 100.00% $ 1,308.00 $1,808.00Actual Total Amt Due $8,532.25Amount Remaining $ 1,308.00 Offer will satisfy all court costs and a small portion of the taxes and liens.
    • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove orstrike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record inthe public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number. Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District 72 West College Avenue San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Grantee: MARIA ROSA SANCHEZ, a single person and LILLIANA SANCHEZ, a single person 718 W 19th Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): The South one-half of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 288, Page 55, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #15-28100-0003-029-00 Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on January 6, 2004 in Suit No. B-00-0043-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated November 17, 2011, and recorded in Instrument 710996, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantors right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantees heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax- Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded. Grantees rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was
    • not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date ofthe sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose. Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the marketvalue specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and allfuture years. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the JudgmentATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agentAlicia Ramirez, City ClerkSTATE OF TEXAS § §COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, onbehalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in theabove instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of TexasAfter Recording, Return To:
    • City of San AngeloMemo Date: March 6, 2013 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Michael Dane, ACM/CFO Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Morgan Trainer, Budget, 325-653-6291 Caption: Consent Agenda Consideration of adoption of a resolution allowing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a contract with the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau allocating Hotel Occupancy Tax funds. Summary: City staff is requesting the City Council consider adopting a resolution allowing staff to continue negotiating terms of the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau contract for use of hotel occupancy tax dollars. Due to San Angelo’s changing economy and positive hotel occupancy tax experience, it is prudent to change existing methodology to provide the best value to the citizens of San Angelo. History: The City of San Angelo levied the hotel occupancy tax for the operation of convention facilities, the promotion of tourism, and the improvement of the arts. Current contracts and ordinances allocate 48% of tax receipts to City of San Angelo Civic Events, 47% to the Convention & Visitors Bureau, and the remaining 5% to the San Angelo Cultural Affairs Council. The current tax rate is 7% for the City of San Angelo. The state levies an additional 6%. No change is proposed to the tax levy. On February 5, 2013 City Council discussed changing the Hotel Occupancy Tax allocation process. On March 5, 2013 staff presented a draft contract with the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau to revise the way Hotel Occupancy Tax dollars are disbursed to include clear communication, performance benchmarks, demonstrate the value added, and allow the City Council to shape the entity’s activity. Financial Impact: The current budget for the Convention & Visitors Bureau contract is $693,250. The proposed contract would allocate $795,000 to the Convention & Visitors Bureau. Though this would require an increase to the budget of $101,750, this proposed allocation is less than last year’s transfer of $1,003,034.18. Though a budget amendment is required, there is ample funding available based on year to date trend to fund this contract with hotel occupancy tax. Related Vision Item Financial Vision (if applicable): Other Information/ Staff recommends approval of the resolution Recommendation: Attachments: Proposed Convention & Visitors Bureau contract and Resolution Presentation: None
    • Publication: NoneReviewed by Michael Dane, Finance, 3/6/2013Director:Approved by Legal: Pending
    • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU ALLOCATING HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUNDS WHEREAS, the State of Texas allows local governments to levy a hotel occupancy tax toenhance and promote tourism, to construct and maintain convention center facilities, toencourage the arts, for historical restoration, and for expenses for sporting events; and WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo has levied such a tax at the rate of 7% for the operation ofconvention facilities, the promotion of tourism, and the improvement of the arts; and WHEREAS, the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau is the City’s agent topromote tourism; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO that its City Manager Daniel Valenzuela or his designee is hereby authorized tonegotiate and execute a contract with the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureauallocating hotel occupancy tax funds:APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO _______________________________ Alvin New, MayorAttest:______________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Content: Approved As to Form:______________________________ ______________________________Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • Exhibit "A" CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 2013 BUDGETINCOME: Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts 795,000.00 Interest Income 350.00 Other Income/Visitor Center Sales 8,000.00 Community Events 0.00 Travel Cookbooks Income 0.00TOTAL INCOME $803,350.00OPERATING EXPENSES: Extra Help/Part Time 17,500.00 Administrative Salaries 197,887.00 Social Security 11,800.00 Bookkeeping/Administration 17,000.00 Medicare 2,700.00 Employee Retirement 10,600.00 Unemployment Comp 600.00 Group Insurance 29,150.00 Audit/Legal 2,600.00 Facility Agreement 6,000.00 Rent/Storage Bldg. 1,000.00 Equipment Expense 18,000.00 Insurance 4,680.00 Postage 2,400.00 Telephone 7,000.00 Office Supplies 6,500.00 Automobile 19,000.00Miscellaneous Office Support 2,000.00 Maintenance 11,600.00 Security 2,000.00 Utilities 14,000.00 Computers/Database Support 5,000.00 Christmas Lights Expense 1,750.00 Cornerstone Expense 200.00TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 390,967.00
    • MARKETING/ADVERTISING Professional Dues 7,000.00 Pro Training/Conferences 4,500.00 Subscriptions 5,000.00 Advertising/publicity 185,000.00 Volunteer Programs 2,400.00 Public Relations 5,000.00 Convention Servicing/Supplies 27,000.00 Promotional Items 11,500.00 Visitors & Travel Marketing 29,575.00 Convention & Travel Trade 48,000.00 Postage/marketing 3,500.00 800 Number (telephone) 400.00 Trade Shows 23,000.00 Visitor Center Merchandise 6,000.00 Brochure Development/Printing 12,000.00 Visitor Event Incentive 40,000.00 CVB Website 2,500.00TOTAL MARKETING/ADV 412,375.00TOTAL EXPENSES 803,342.00SURPLUS (DEFICIT) 8.00
    • City of San Angelo Office of the City ClerkMemoDate: March 8, 2013To: Mayor and CouncilmembersFrom: Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkSubject: Agenda Item for March 20, 2012 Council MeetingContact: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk, 657-4405Caption: Consent Item Consideration of adopting a Resolution appointing election officials for the election to be held on May 11, 2013; and providing for an effective dateSummary: The Resolution appointing election officials, judges and alternates for the General/Special Election is a routine action required by the Election Code. In the majority of the polling places, both the judges and alternates have previously served for City elections. In all polling places, either the judge or alternate has experience in serving for elections. In addition, State Law requires the presiding judge of an election precinct to make reasonable efforts to appoint a sufficient number of election clerks who are fluent in both English and Spanish to serve the needs of the Spanish-speaking voters of the precinct, if five percent (5%) or more of the inhabitants are persons of Spanish origin or descent. Most precincts will include two (2) election clerks. In accordance with the Election Services Contract with the Tom Green County Elections Administrator previously approved by the Council, the list of judges and alternates is provided by the Elections Administrator and is responsible for ensuring reasonable efforts to serve Spanish- speaking voters.Financial Impact: The expense of the Election is shared on a pro rata basis with the Independent School Districts in San Angelo, Grape Creek, Wall, and Veribest. The estimated total cost for a city-wide election at $30,000.00 to $40,000.00 and we are anticipating a Runoff Election for June 15, 2013..Other Information/Recommendation: On the final two days of early voting by personal appearance, the Election Administrator’s office and branch location hours will be designated from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m., beginning on May 6 and ending May 7, 2013. Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. The Resolution designating the polling locations and Contract for joint election services was authorized in December 6, 2011.Attachments: Resolution appointing Election Judges
    • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, APPOINTING ELECTION OFFICIALS FOR THE ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MAY 11, 2013; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo adopted Ordinance #2013-02-??? calling for theGeneral Election on May 11, 2013; and WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo adopted Resolution #2013-03-??? designatingpolling places within the election precincts within the City of San Angelo, Texas for electionsordered; and WHEREAS, the Texas Election Code Section 32.005 authorizes the City Council toappoint election judges for the designated polling places, within the election precincts withinthe City of San Angelo, Texas for elections ordered by the City; and WHEREAS, by this Resolution, it is the intention of the City Council to appointelection officials and judges to each early voting and election day polling place within thedesignated election precinct; and WHEREAS, the Election Services Contract with the Tom Green CountyElections Administrator provides that the Administrator arrange for the use of the pollingplaces and furnish a list of judges and Alternateernates for each polling place; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: SECTION 1: FINDINGS INCORPORATED. The findings set forth above areincorporated into the body of this Resolution as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: DESIGNATION OF ELECTION JUDGES ANDALTERNATEERNATES FOR THE CITY’S ELECTION PRECINCTS FOR THE GENERALELECTION TO HELD ON MAY 11, 2013: The election judges and Alternateernatesassigned to the designated election precincts within the City, as set forth in Exhibit "A",attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. SECTION 3: FURTHER DESIGNATION: The City further authorizes the City Clerkto appoint substitute election judges in the event the individuals appointed herein areunable to fulfill their duties. SECTION 4: NECESSARY ACTIONS: The Mayor and the City Clerk, in consultationwith the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actionsnecessary to comply with the provisions of the Code, the Texas Election Code and anyother state or federal law in carrying out and designating polling placing, whether or notexpressly authorized herein and all actions previously taken are hereby ratified.
    • SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall become effectiveimmediately upon its passage.APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 19th day of March, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ___________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:_______________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As to Content: Approved As to Form:Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • Exhibit “A” DESIGNATION OF ELECTION JUDGES AND ALTERNATEERNATE JUDGES FOR DESIGNATED POLLING PLACES FOR MAY 11, 2013 GENERAL/SPECIAL ELECTION ELECTION DAY POLLING LOCATIONS OPEN FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 7:00 P.M.Election Day Dia de las EleccionesMay 11, 2013, 7 am to 7 pm El 11 de mayo, 2013, desde las 7 hasta las 7Voters in precincts 114, 137, and 144 vote at Belmore Baptist Church-Fellowship Hall, 1214 S. Bell St.Votantes en precintos 114, 137, y 144, votar en Belmore Baptist Church-Fellowship Hall, 1214 South BellELECTION JUDGE: David McMahon, Judge and Nelda Englert, Alternate JudgeVoters in precincts 106, 107, 127, and 146 vote at Baptist Memorial Hospital, 902 N. Main, ChapelVotantes en precintos 106, 107, 124, y 146 votan en la capilla de Baptist Memorial Hospital, 902 Main al Norte.ELECTION JUDGE: Mark Gregory, Judge and Maggie Fernandez, Alternateernate JudgeVoters in precinct 108 vote at Harriett Baptist Church, 7626 N US Hwy 67Votantes en precinto 108 votan en Harriett Baptist Church, 7626 N US Hwy 67ELECTION JUDGE: Noemi Hoelscher, Judge and Cruz Carol, Alternateernate JudgeVoters in precincts 112 and 213 vote at St Ambrose Church, 8602 Loop 570, Wall, TX.Votantes en precintos 112 y 213 votan en St. Ambrose Church, 8602 Loop 570, Wall, TX.ELECTION JUDGE: Lloyd Moore, Judge and Charlene Dusek, Alternateernate JudgeVoters in precincts 228, and 230 vote at Southgate Church of Christ, 528 Country Club Rd.Votantes dentro precintos 228, y 230 votan en Southgate Church of Christ, 528 Country Club Road.ELECTION JUDGE: Sid Clemmer, Judge and Carol Cahill, Alternateernate JudgeVoters in precincts 215 and 241 vote at Texas Department of Transportation, 4502 Knickerbocker Rd., Bldg. EVotantes en precintos 215 y 241 votan en el Departamento de Transporte de Texas, 4502 Knickerbocker Road,Edificio "E".ELECTION JUDGE: Charlie Hafer, Judge and Sue Bramhall, Alternate JudgeVoters in precincts 304, 306, and 348 vote at Lakeview Bible Church, 4825 Grape Creek Rd.Votantes en precintos 304, 306, y 348 votan en Lakeview Bible Church, 4825 Grape Creek RoadELECTION JUDGE: Gloria Mata, Judge and Aurora Rodriguez , Alternate JudgeVoters in precincts 305, 308, 319, 327, and 351 vote at Ángelo Bible Church, 3506 Sherwood Way.Votantes en precintos 305, 308, 319, 327, y 351 votan en Ángelo Bible Church, 3506 Sherwood Way.ELECTION JUDGE: Sandi Smith, Judge and Charlene Corfield , Alternate JudgeVoters in precinct 358 vote at Grape Creek ISD Admin. Building, 8207 US Hwy. 87 N.Votantes en precinto 358 votan en el DEI de Grape Creek en el edificio de Administración, 8207 US HWY 87,Norte.ELECTION JUDGE: Betty Lacy, Judge and Gena Franks, Alternate JudgeVoters in precincts 402, 420, 421, and 424 vote at Plaza del Sol Apartments, 4359 Oak Grove Blvd.Votantes en precintos 402, 420, 421, y 424 votan en Plaza del Sol Apartments, 4359 Oak Grove BoulevardELECTION JUDGE: John Graham, Judge and Mitch Krasny, Alternate JudgeVoters in precincts 401, 434, 435, and 436 vote at MHMR Services, 1501 W. Beauregard Ave.Votantes en precintos 401, 434. 435 y 436 votan en Servicios de MHMR 1501 Beauregard, Oeste.ELECTION JUDGE: Ivey Mossell, Judge and Jim Jones, Alternate JudgeVoters in precinct 423 vote at Knickerbocker Community Center, 14608 FM 2335, Knickerbocker, TX.Votantes en precinto 423 votan en Knickerbocker Community Center, 14608 FM 2335, Knickerbocker, TX.ELECTION JUDGE: Mary Page, Judge and Silvia Montalvo, Alternate Judge
    • Early Voting by personal appearance and mail, 113 W. BeauregardVona McKerley, Early Voting ClerkAlicia Ramirez, Deputy Early Voting ClerkRudy Olivas, Deputy Early Voting ClerkVanessa Simon, Deputy Early Voting ClerkEarly Voting Ballot Board, 113 W. BeauregardKatherine Osborne, ChairpersonCLERKS: Lenda Campbell, Stella Hodges, Connie DelaRosa, Anita Betty,Linda Martin, and Charlene SchmidtCentral Counting Station and Manual Count, 113 W. BeauregardAlicia Ramirez, Presiding JudgeVona McKerley, ManagerRudy Olivas, Technical SupervisorCLERKS: John Stone, Barbara Stone, Kevin Burke, Gwenn Neill, MikeGranados, and Stephen RadloffTECHNICAL CLERKS: John Stone and Barbara StoneTom Green County Sherriff, SecurityDOCK: Bob Boyles and Danny ListPrecinct Records and Voted Ballots Storage, 113 W. BeauregardVona McKerley, Agent to General CustodianAlicia Ramirez, General Custodian of Special Election Records
    • City of San AngeloMemo Date: To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Carl White, Parks & Recreation Director Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Carl White, 325-234-1724 Caption: Consent Item Consideration of approving an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement with the San Angelo Independent School District for the construction of improvements at the Bradford Elementary School Park and authorizing the Mayor or City Manager to execute the agreement. Summary: This agreement will authorize the construction of park amenities on the Bradford th School property (vicinity 24 and Poe Streets in Northeast San Angelo) and document the relationship between the City and SAISD regarding this project and the availability of the improvements to the public as well as maintenance responsibilities. History: There is no history on this item. Funds are available for park improvements and Council has directed staff to cooperate with SAISD to provide park amenities, where possible, on school property such that they can be used by the public and maintained by SAISD. Financial Impact: The cost of the project is $175,000.00 from half-cent sales tax funds dedicated to Park Improvements. Related Vision Item Neighborhood Vision – provide adequate amenities for all neighborhoods. (if applicable): Other Information/ Staff recommends approval. Recommendation: Attachments: Proposed agreement and Resolution Presentation: N/A Publication: N/A Reviewed by Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager Director: Approved by Legal: Yes Adopted: 5/30/03 Revised: 6/21/10
    • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN ANGELO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (SAISD) PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION BY THE CITY OF RECREATIONAL AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS, NOT TO EXCEED $175,000.00, FOR PUBLIC USE ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE SAISD GENERALLY KNOWN AS BRADFORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE SAISD WHEREAS, the City Council determines that it is in the interest of the citizens ofthe City of San Angelo for the City to cooperate with the San Angelo Independent SchoolDistrict (SAISD) for the joint use of resources to mutually provide park amenities open tothe public ; and, WHEREAS, the Bradford Elementary School is located on N. Poe Street, betweenE. 22nd Street and E. 24th Street, and includes vacant land suitable for recreational andpark amenities for public use; and, WHEREAS, the SAISD is agreeable to maintain park facilities proposed to beconstructed on school district property by the City for public use under terms of aninterlocal agreement, for a term of twenty-five years with option to renew for anadditional twenty-five years, which use would be beneficial for the citizens of the City ofSan Angelo; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT: The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute an InterlocalCooperation Agreement on behalf of the City of San Angelo with the San AngeloIndependent School District effective for a term of twenty-five years with an option torenew for an additional twenty-five years, pursuant to which the City of San Angelo shallconstruct recreational and park improvements on certain property owned by the SAISDknown as Bradford Elementary School, in a sum not to exceed One Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($175,000.00), for public use by the Citizens of SanAngelo.. PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2013. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXASATTEST: Alvin New, MayorAlicia Ramirez, City Clerk
    • APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORMCarl White, Parks & Recreation Director Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • City of San AngeloMemo Date: To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Assistant City Manager Rick Weise, 657-4241 Caption: Consent Item Consideration of A Resolution by the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, authorizing the City Manager to execute a First Amended Lease Agreement amending the original lease agreement between City of San Angelo and Howard County Junior College District, including extending the original lease term and providing for additional improvements to be made on leased premises. Summary/History: Since January of 2001, Howard County Junior College District and the City of San Angelo have operated a highly successful vocational training program commonly referred to as the West Texas Training Center (WTTC) located at the Howard College San Angelo Campus facility. Due to its success, the Howard College San Angelo Campus facility has reached maximum enrollment and additional facilities are needed to better serve the citizens of San Angelo and surrounding areas. The identified needs are both vocational and academic programs and the expanded services will begin immediately upon construction. Preexisting educational services will continue without interruption. For this reason, Howard County Junior College District requests the City of San Angelo approve the attached amendment to the original lease between the parties which provides for a fifty five (55) year lease term from the inception of the original lease term of September 1, 2008 and for one (1) renewal term of twenty five (25) years. This amended lease term will allow Howard County Junior College District to construct and maintain additional vocational and educational facilities for the benefit of the Howard College San Angelo campus and the San Angelo community as a whole. The improvements will be financed by revenue bonds to be repaid by student tuition and other fees. All costs of construction and maintenance will be assumed by Howard County Junior College District for the period of the lease. After the term of the lease and any renewal term expire, ownership of the facilities will transfer to City of San Angelo. The proposed facilities and improvements have been designed by the architectural firm of Parkhill Smith and Cooper Inc. employing the construction management at risk procurement and delivery method. Financial Impact: Lessee bears cost for performance and obligations. Related Vision Item None. (if applicable): Other Information/ Staff recommends the City Manager to execute the lease agreement. Recommendation:
    • Attachments: Resolution Lease AgreementPresentation: None.Publication: None.Reviewed by None.Director:Approved by Legal: City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling, 3/12/13
    • A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FIRST AMENDED LEASE AGREEMENT AMENDING THE ORIGINAL LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND HOWARD COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT, INCLUDING EXTENDING THE ORIGINAL LEASE TERM AND PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE ON LEASED PREMISES. WHEREAS, City and Howard County Junior College District entered into Lease Agreement ("LeaseAgreement") on August 19, 2008 for lease of 20.087 acres of land, to include the West Texas TrainingCenter located at 3501 N. US HWY 67, San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, for the operation andmaintenance of a technical training center for public education purposes; WHEREAS, City and Lessee now desire to amend Lease Agreement and enter into FirstAmended Lease Agreement to change certain provisions of Lease Agreement, including extending theoriginal lease term and providing for additional improvements to be made on leased premises; WHEREAS, all of the terms and conditions of the original Lease Agreement shall be and remainin full force and effect unless amended or changed by the First Amended Lease Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SANANGELO, TEXAS THAT: The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the First Amended Lease Agreement on behalf of theCity of San Angelo and Howard County Junior College District amending the original Lease Agreement betweenthe parties dated August 19, 2008. PASSED and APPROVED THIS _ _ _ _ _ DAY OF _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.~:, 2013.ATTEST: CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXASAlicia Ramirez, City Clerk Alvin New, MayorAPPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORMRick Weise, Assistant City Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • City of San AngeloMemo Date: December 14, 2012 To: Mayor and Council members From: City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Contact: Office of the City Attorney, 657-4405 Caption: Consent Agenda Consideration of the adoption of a resolution endorsing certain legislative action in rd the Regular Session of the 83 Legislature to enhance the competitive electric market and system reliability and to protect the traditional role of cities in the regulatory process.. Summary: The City of San Angelo is a member of the Texas Coalition for Affordable Power (TCAP). More than 160 cities and political subdivisions make up TCAP, which is one of the largest organizations of energy consumers in the State of Texas. TCAP, as part of its mission, monitors federal, state and local initiatives that may affect the price and availability of energy, and proactively promotes affordable energy policies which can impact municipal budgets and the ability to fund essential services History: Historically, cities have formed coalitions to represent their collective interests before utility rate regulatory agencies and courts. By forming coalitions, cities have been able to present a strong voice for consumers for over thirty years. This has served to reduce costs that cities and their residents pay for electric and gas utility services. In numerous instances, without the participation of coalitions of cities, rate increases would have gone into effect without any party scrutinizing the utility’s application for rate increase. Participation in the coalition and adoption of the resolution endorsing legislative action to enhance the competitive electric market will demonstrate the mutual concern of the City of San Angelo with other city members of TCAP for reliability, quality of service, and price of electric utilities. Financial Impact: The City of San Angelo is a member of TCAP. Support of the efforts of the coalition may result in maintaining favorable legislation accommodating the participation of Texas cities in the process for consideration of future utility applications for rate increases. Related Vision Item N/A (if applicable): Other Information/ N/A Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.
    • Attachments: The proposed resolution is attached.Presentation: N/APublication: N/AReviewed by City Attorney Lysia H. BowlingDirector:Approved by Legal: 3/12/13
    • RESOLUTION NO. ____________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ENDORSING CERTAIN LEGISLATIVE ACTION IN THE REGULAR SESSION OF THE 83RD TEXAS LEGISLATURE TO ENHANCE THE COMPETITIVE ELECTRIC MARKET AND SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND TO PROTECT THE TRADITIONAL ROLE OF CITIES IN THE REGULATORY PROCESS WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo, Texas is a member of Texas Coalition for AffordablePower (“TCAP”), a non-profit political subdivision created by cities throughout Texas to secureaffordable electric energy for its members in the deregulated electric market; and WHEREAS, TCAP pools the energy needs of its more than 160 political subdivisionmembers to negotiate favorable prices and contract terms for the purchase of approximately 1.3billion kilowatt hours annually; and WHEREAS, affordable and reliable power means economic development for the City and abetter standard of living for our citizens; and WHEREAS, the City supports legislative initiatives that promote a healthy electric marketwhere competition can flourish and electric customers can save money; and WHEREAS, the City endorses the legislative agenda of TCAP and opposes legislativeinitiatives that would fundamentally alter the ERCOT energy market or the traditional role of cities inthe regulatory process.THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO,TEXAS, THAT: 1. The Regular Session of the 83rd Texas Legislature be encouraged to preserve thetraditional role of cities in the regulatory process, including original jurisdiction and reimbursementof reasonable rate case expenses. 2. The Legislature make no statutory changes that would lead to a reduction in revenuespaid by public utilities as franchise fees for rental of public rights-of-way. 3. The Legislature facilitate and encourage public/private partnerships between citiesand electric generation developers in creating small-scale (not to exceed 50 MW) power plantscapable of rapidly meeting peak power needs. 4. The Legislature recognize that “smart meters” are under-utilized with regard toencouraging and incentivizing reductions in energy consumption during peak periods and that theregulated transmission and distribution utilities which own the “smart meters” be allowed to re-enterthe retail electric market to the extent they offer regulated rate plans designed to incent reductions inpeak energy consumption. 5. The Legislature preclude foreign ownership of electric distribution assets and make itclear that, notwithstanding any other provision in law, home rule cities, individually or collectively,shall be permitted to own and operate electric distribution assets so long as said cities are notinvolved in retail sales of electricity.
    • 6. The Legislature resist any efforts to transform the energy-only ERCOT market into acapacity market which would increase the price of electricity by artificially inflating generatorprofits. 7. The Legislature enhance protections against anti-competitive activities in thewholesale market and require the Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) to reform its rules related toVoluntary Mitigation Plans and allow cities and other interested parties to participate in review ofsuch plans. 8. The Legislature mandate that the PUC and market participants provide consumereducation regarding the relationship between time of use, cost of energy production and transmission,and the price paid by consumers. 9. The Legislature require the PUC to establish certain uniform products that must beoffered by all retail electric providers (“REPs”) and to establish new rules governing thepowertochoose.org and powertosavetexas.org websites that will better inform retail customers ofcomplaints against REPs and better educate customers regarding the economic and market benefits ofreducing demand during peak periods. 10. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. 11. A copy of this resolution shall be sent to the elected lawmakers representing theCity’s interests in the Texas House and Senate and to Randolph C. Moravec, Executive Director ofTCAP, 15455 Dallas Parkway, Addison, Texas 75001.PRESENTED AND PASSED on this ______ day of ____________, 2013 by a vote of ____ ayesand ____ nays at a regular meeting of the City Council of San Angelo, Texas. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ____________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:______________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkAPPROVED AS TO FORM:_____________________________Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • The Texas Coalition for Affordable PowerRecommendations for a MoreCompetitive Electric MarketBecause high energy costs can impact municipalbudgets and the ability to fund essential services, TCAP,as part of its mission, actively promotes affordable energypolicies. Affordable power in a fully competitive marketalso means economic development for our communitiesand a better life for our citizens. TCAP members arecommitted to making electric deregulation work.Maintaining an even playing field for citiesCities have a long history representing consumers in “regulated” rate cases. But big electric companieswant to deter cities from exercising any opposition so they can more easily raise rates. TCAP will workhard at the Texas Legislature to protect city authority.Fair Price for Electricity Produced at HomeAre rooftop solar panels installed in your community? TCAP supports legislation that will ensure thatresidential and small commercial customers that produce excess power at their homes or businessesreceive a fair price for power they provide the grid.Reduce Confusion in the Retail Electricity MarketTexans should have access to standard-language electricity deals. These deals will enhance competitionby facilitating apples-to-apples price shopping. Contact: Randolph (Randy) C. Moravec, PhD, Executive Director rcmoravec@tcaptx.com • (972) 742-7015
    • Avoid Changes in the Market that Will Increase CostsSome of the state’s generation companies want to receive big payments for power plants, regardlessof whether any power is actually generated — and are lobbying hard for changes to make it happen.TCAP will oppose proposals at the Legislature that create unnecessary price supports for generators thatcircumvent the competitive market and increase electricity costs to consumers.Updating Market Protections in the Lone Star StateWhere appropriate, anti-competitive behavior prohibited in other states should also be prohibited inTexas. Texas regulators should have the same power to assess penalties as regulators elsewhere. Legalloopholes that exempt some generators from prosecution should be closed.Promote Public-Private Electric Generation PartnershipsTCAP wants cities to have the right to pursue small-scale generation projects, just so long as the projectsenhance economic development and produce affordable power. Such public-private partnerships alsoare a cost-effective way to help address the state’s long-term generation and reliability challenges.No foreign ownership of electric distribution facilitiesTexans depend on a complex network of wires to bring power to their homes. With so much at stake,accountability is important. That’s why there should be no foreign ownership of local electric distributionnetworks. When the system fails or bills go up, Texans shouldn’t have to call Madrid to complain.Home rule cities — individually or collectively —also should be permitted to own and operate electricdistribution networks.Hold Big Generation Companies Accountable for Market AbusesUnder Texas law, big generation companies can obtain advanced regulatory protections against futureprosecution for anti-competitive behavior. TCAP supports reforms to ensure that these advancedprotections are fair, and don’t become “Get Out Of Jail Free” cards for market abusers. Contact: Randolph (Randy) C. Moravec, PhD, Executive Director rcmoravec@tcaptx.com • (972) 742-7015
    • National Nutrition Month® 2013 Proclamation(State or City) OFEXECUTIVE OFFICEPROCLAMATIONWHEREAS food is the substance by which life is sustained; andWHEREAS the type, quality, and amount of food that individuals consume each day plays avital role in their overall health and physical fitness; andWHEREAS there is a need for continuing nutrition education and a wide-scale effort toenhance healthy eating practices;NOW, THEREFORE I, _________________(Name), __________________(Title)_________________________________________________________, (City/State)DO HEREBY PROCLAIM the month of March NATIONAL NUTRITION MONTH® in(City/State)_______________, and I encourage all citizens to join the campaignand become concerned about their nutrition and the nutrition of others in the hope ofachieving optimum health for both today and tomorrow.IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the_____________________________________________________________________to be affixed.Done at the ____________on this the ________day of ________________________,Two thousand and thirteen.By:Title:Attest:Title:
    • PROCLAMATIONWHEREAS, For over 150 years, Lutheran Schools have provided communities, states, and the country with Christian leaders in business, politics, military, ministry, education, and other fields; andWHEREAS, National Lutheran Schools Month is also an occasion for schools to interest citizens in volunteering their time and talents to local Lutheran Schools; andWHEREAS, Lutheran Schools have provided a quality Christian education program that has inspired students to serve others through civic engagement and provided students with opportunities to serve while equipping them with the tools they need to fulfill their future roles as good citizens, productive employees, and compassionate leaders; andWHEREAS, Locally we are joining with Trinity Lutheran School as they celebrate almost 63 years of service to our Community;NOW, THEREFORE, I, Alvin New, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, on behalfof the City Council, do hereby proclaim March, 2013 as “NATIONAL LUTHERAN SCHOOLS MONTH”and encourage everyone to pay tribute to the dedication and service of TrinityLutheran School for their many years of commitment to the community of San Angelo. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this 19th day of March, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ALVIN NEW, MAYOR
    • City of San AngeloMemo Meeting Date: March 5, 2013 To: City Council members From: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner Subject: PD 13-01 West Company/Granger Macdonald, A request for approval of a zone change from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to Planned Development (PD) to specifically allow for multi-family living and a lease house /amenity center on the following property: Location: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property, located directly west of the intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo. Purpose: Approval of this request will change the zoning designation on the property and allow the construction of multi-family dwelling units. Contacts: Andrew Mellen, West Company 432-682-0588 Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner 325-657-4210 Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo PD 13-01: West Company/Granger Macdonald AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently described as Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the
    • intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY Summary: The City Council may: (1) Approve the proposed zone change; (2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or (3) Approve subject to modification OR acceptance of proposed conditions; or (4) Deny the proposed zone change Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone change, subject to the Conditions listed in Conditions 5-14 of the attached draft ordinance. Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a 5-0 vote on February 18, 2013.History and Background: General Information Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) Existing Land Use: undeveloped, vacant property Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: CH Undeveloped open property West: CG & RS-1 Undeveloped property & ball fields South: RS-1 Red Arroyo, vacant land East: CG Vacant property & retail establishments 2
    • Thoroughfares/Streets: Northwest Drive is defined as a collector street in this area and is designed to collect local street traffic carrying it to arterial streets at a moderate speed. Green Hill Road is defined as a local street and is designed to carries light neighborhood traffic at lower speeds and generally connects to collector streets.Zoning History: No previous zoning history on this property. The general area was annexed into the City Limits in November of 1997Development Standards: All required off-street parking and the connection(s) to a public right-of-way are required to be paved. Construction of more than one principal building for multi-family use on a lot requires an Urban Design Review to be completed and approved before construction may take place. Other applicable development standards are included in the draft ordinance at the end of this report.Vision Plan Map: CommercialComp Plan Excerpts: Goal Three from the Neighborhood Section of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan states that (the city should), "Improve relationship between adjacent commercial and residential land use adjacencies." One action step of this goal states that (the city should), " Require a buffer separating commercial, industrial, or agricultural zoned lands from neighborhoods. This buffer may be an intermediate “mixed-use” zone, a landscape buffer, or public right- of-way. Goal One from the Commercial Section of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan states that (the city should), "Establish transition areas between commercial areas and nearby neighborhoods." 3
    • Special Information Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning from residential and commercial to Planned Development with the allowance for a multi-family living facility will certainly generate additional traffic than if the property remained as is. Northwest Drive has immediate access to the Houston Harte Expressway and Arden Road; both of these roadways are designed to carry traffic at higher speeds with limited access. Parking Requirements: See Section 11 of the attached draft ordinance. Parking Provided: No off-street parking is currently provided. Density: No development is currently open space is currently present in this area Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 1 Responses in Favor: 0 Responses in Opposition: 0Analysis: In order to approve this zone change request, the City Council members are first required to consider the following criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council. 2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land. 4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment. 4
    • 5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.Staff finds this request to be consistent and compatible with the plans and policiesadopted by the community for this particular area. When examining the comprehensivePlan as a whole, the intent is to transition from more intense zoning classificationsslowly into neighborhoods. In examining this particular request, staff believes a multi-family complex will serve as this transition in this area. The areas along Houston Harteare intended for higher trafficked and more intense commercial uses. In examining thisparticular area, there is neighborhood development called for to the west. Staff believesthis request is consistent with the goals of the communitys comprehensive plan and thisparticular development will serve as a gentle transition into the neighborhood areas.Given the current zoning of the property, a much higher intensity usage would beallowed and also be a much less suitable into the neighborhood areas identified withinthe vision plan.It is the belief of staff that a Planned Development for this particular property willgenerally be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. The introduction of amulti-family dwelling unit development in this area is compatible with the surroundingarea. The street networks capability in this area and isolated location make this an areawhere staff believes a multi-family dwelling will be successful. This higher intensity,residential development will not generate the traffic that a retail establishment has thepotential to, but at the same time the number of visitors to and from the site will be morelike a traditional neighborhood, but a more compact scale. Staff is confident thisPlanned Development will serve as a buffer from the higher intensity commercial usesthat may occur along northwest to the envisioned neighborhood development areas tothe west. The Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan seek to create thesetransition areas between land uses and in turn help to create orderly predictabledevelopment in this area. This proposal will not alter development patterns in this area,in fact this development may serve as a catalyst for infill development in this area,something that is also encouraged within the Comprehensive Plan. 5
    • The intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance is to create transitionalzones between commercial zoning and residential zoning within the community. Multi-family developments tend to be a bit of a hybrid regarding the actual land use. Thesetypes of developments are residential in nature and use, but depending upon the size,can generate traffic at a higher rate than a lower density neighborhood can. Whileapartments can be part of a successful neighborhood (one which offers a wide variety ofhousing options), staff believes this Planned Development and the intensity it is seekingto create on the property will be consistent with the goals and intent of theComprehensive Plan for this area. As such, no vision Comprehensive Plan amendmentwill be required to approve this request.This proposal will certainly have an effect on the natural environment in this area as theland is currently undeveloped and in its natural state. The proximity to the Red Arroyoand the sheer size of this development will require some storm water mitigation throughthe platting process. The applicant is aware of the effect this development will have onthe area and it is the understanding of staff that there are plans being worked on toaccount for this effect on the environment in this area. The development is locatednearby other businesses at this time, but given the size of the parcels in this area will besomewhat isolated when it is completed. Given the development patterns of the areaand isolation from other properties, staff believes that neighboring properties will seelittle to no detrimental effects from this proposed development.The community is certainly growing and a need for more housing and housing choicescertainly comes along with the anticipated growth. Staff believes this area has a greatpotential for infill development or both commercial and residential opportunities. A multi-family development will serve as a transition between zoning districts and will help toensure consistent development patterns in this area. This region of town has somecommercial uses and lower density residential zoning and development in placecurrently. This mix of housing choices in the region will help to solidify the developmentpatterns and be highly consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan in staffsopinion. The commercial zoning present along Houston Harte and Arden Road will needa population base to develop successfully in staffs opinion. Allowing for a multi-familydevelopment in this area would add population that can utilize the existing businesses,and also has the potential to create demand for new businesses. This relationshipbetween commercial and residential properties in this area can be promoted andprotected further by introducing this Planned Development District to serve as atransition and a compliment to current and future development for the area.The draft ordinance accompanying this report is designed in a manner that ensures thatthe plans and renderings submitted will occur on this property. Due to the nature of thePlanned Development, any deviations in design or layout of the site would requirerehearing. Staff believes a project of this size and scale in this area, the design and sitelayout are essential. The site plan allows for circulation inside and outside the site in alogical, orderly pattern; in addition the renderings of the buildings and proposed 6
    • materials are aesthetically pleasing and will be a compliment to the area in staffsopinion.Proposed ConditionsConditions of the Planned Development are listed in the draft ordinance at the end ofthis report in sections 5 through 14.Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within the City of San Angelo; excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from the comprehensive plan vision map highlighting the subject property; draft minute excerpt from the February 18, 2013 Planning Commission meeting; draft ordinance with site plan; and large scale site plan.Presentation: AJ Fawver, AICP Interim Director of Development Services 7
    • 9
    • 10
    • 11
    • B. PD 13-01: West Company/ Granger Macdonald A request for approval of a zone change from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to Planned Development (PD) to specifically allow for multi-family living and a lease house /amenity center on the following property: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently described as Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo.Jeff Hintz, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staffrecommendation of approval. He gave some background about the property,highlighting the classification for the property in the Vision Plan Map("Commercial"). The area is surrounded by commercial properties, and there issome undeveloped property, as well as ball fields to the west. The area wasannexed in 1997. Mr. Hintz reviewed the criteria required to be considered as partof zone change requests. The request is consistent with the Citys plans, policiesand ordinances and is compatible with the surrounding area. An Urban DesignReview was required due to the size of the planned construction, and this UDR hasbeen approved by the Interim Director/Planning Manager. This less intensivezoning will provide a better transition than the stark commercial to low-intensityresidential change that exists today. The platting process will handle storm waterrequirements and other development-related standards. The Comprehensive Planspeaks to improving the relationship between adjacent commercial and residentialland use adjacencies, which staff finds this plan actually does. This property alsoprovides flexibility of design, meets the traffic capabilities of the area, and providesinfill development. The PD is the most predictable type of zoning district, as acustom zoning ordinance is crafted for the use. Mr. Hintz addressed the communityneed - providing a diverse mix of housing, and that it is far less intensive than thecurrent zoning allows.Mr. Hintz showed the planned subdivision plat and the UDR that was approved bythe staff members. The concept plan for the ordinance, illustrating the layout ofresidential buildings on this tract. The proposed PD ordinance only allows for multi-family living and an amenity center. The development is in accordance with thestandards of the Zoning Ordinance. Signage will match the materials of thedwelling units, and pole signs are strictly prohibited. Landscaping will be providing,and a wrought iron fence with brick columns will surround the exterior of the sitealong the boundaries. Sidewalks are also proposed, so it certainly makes this areaa walkable one. Mr. Hintz offered to answer any other questions or get into thedetails of the ordinance more, but the Commission had no additional questions.Justin McDonald, representing the applicant, came forward to answer any questionsthe Commission had, and complimented the staff on their presentation. Mr. Wynneasked for the number of units, and Mr. McDonald stated that there are 176 unitsplanned. Jennifer Boggs asked about the mix of units. Mr. McDonald mentionedthat the units will be a mix of 1b/1b, 2b/2b, and 3b/2b. Mr. Hintz answered
    • specifically the number of units that are allocated for each group. Mr. McDonaldmentioned that they also handled the apartment complex on Irene Street, and that itwill somewhat resemble those units.No one else came forward to speak.Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Darlene Jones and seconded byJennifer Boggs. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.
    • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently described as Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYRE: PD 13-01: West Company/Granger Macdonald WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governingbody for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law withreference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publicationand otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all propertyowners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area andin the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set outherein; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enactedby the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included withinChapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same ishereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generallyand the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: anunaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently described asSection 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of theintersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road in western San Angelo shallhenceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Planned Development (PD) Districtallowing for multi-family living and a lease house/amenity center.The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of theDirector of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove describedproperty shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code ofOrdinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.
    • SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment: SEVERABILITY:The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if anyportion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validityof the other provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY:Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and,upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code ofOrdinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute aseparate offense. SECTION 5: Except as otherwise specified or limited below, the use anddevelopment of the subject property shall generally conform to a High Rise Multi-FamilyResidence (RM-2) zoning district unless specified as otherwise within this ordinance. Allactivities shall be limited to those associated with multi-family living, leasehouse/amenities center. SECTION 6: Overall site use shall be in accordance with the map shown as ExhibitA of this Ordinance. Changes to the usage of this property shall be approved through anamendment to this Planned Development District with approval from the PlanningCommission and City Council. SECTION 7: Design of the buildings, coloring, and materials shall conform to theconditional approval given (see Urban Design Review 13-01) approved by the PlanningDirector on February 8, 2013 and as maintained on file in the offices of the PlanningDivision. SECTION 8: The following uses are allowed on the subject property, and shallinclude: 1. Apartment dwelling units for "Household Living" as defined in section 313.B.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Offices are to be used solely for the management of the units developed on this site as shown on the concept plan. 3. Incidental accessory uses are intended for tenants and their guests only; this includes laundry facilities, lease house/amenities center, and recreational areas. SECTION 9: Signage shall be allowed within this Planned Development District,provided it meets all of the following criteria:
    • 1. On-site signage shall be limited to free-standing (specifically monument) types only. Pole signage is expressly prohibited. 2. Internally illuminated signage is expressly prohibited. 3. All signage shall be constructed from the same materials and colors approved in the conditional approval given (see Urban Design Review 13-01) approved by the Planning Director on February 8, 2013 and as maintained on file in the offices of the Planning Division. 4. Quantity of signage, area of signage, and placement of signage shall be as directed within the Sign Ordinance for the City of San Angelo. SECTION 10: Fencing around the exterior of the site and the pool area shall beof wrought iron with masonry and stone columns consistent with the conditional approvalgiven (see Urban Design Review 13-01) approved by the Planning Director on February 8,2013 and as maintained on file in the offices of the Planning Division. Other usage offencing material for screening purposes, within the confines of the concept plan for thisPlanned Development shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 509of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 11: Parking standards within this Planned Development District shallbe as follows: 1. One bedroom apartments shall have 1.5 parking spaces per unit. 2. Two bedroom apartments shall have 1.75 parking spaces per unit 3. Three bedroom apartments shall have 2.0 parking spaces per unit. 4. Areas used for the rental office shall have 1 parking space per 300 square feet gross of office space. 5. Design standards for the parking spaces shall be in accordance with Section 511 of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 511.G of the Zoning Ordinance defines dimensions and maneuvering room. Section 511.F of the Zoning Ordinance defines the maintenance of parking facilities. SECTION 12: The sidewalks as shown on the graphic concept plan identified inExhibit A shall be no less than four feet in width, shall be installed prior to the issuanceof a certificate of occupancy, and shall meet all ADA accessibility standards. SECTION 13: No outdoor storage shall be allowed within the boundaries of thisPlanned Development District.
    • SECTION 14: This Planned Development district shall not be added to theOfficial Zoning Map for the City of San Angelo, until the replat establishing Tract 3,Block 3, in Section Three of the Arden Acres is recorded with the Tom Green CountyClerk.INTRODUCED on the 5th day of March, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED ANDADOPTED on this the 19th day of March, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ____________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:________________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As To Content: Approved As To Form:_________________________ ________________________AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Lysia H. Bowling, City AttorneyDevelopment Services
    • Exhibit A, Site Plan
    • City of San AngeloMemo Meeting Date: February 19, 2013 To: City Council members From: Roxanne Johnston, Planner Subject: Z13-02: Debbie Clark. A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to specifically allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts on the following property: Location: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo. Purpose: Approval or modification of this request by the Planning Commission would forward the recommendation to City Council for a final decision on the matter. Contacts: Debbie Clark 325-659-3901 Roxanne Johnston, Planner 325-657-4210 Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo Z 13-02: Debbie Clark AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING
    • THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY Summary: The City Council may: (1) Approve this zone change request from RS-1 to RS-2 which would allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts; or (2) Modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be more appropriate; or (3) Deny this zoning request from RS-1 to RS-2. Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed zone change. On January 28, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a unanimous vote of 5-0.History and Background: General Information Existing Zoning: Single Family Residential (RS-1) Existing Land Use: Vacant property, vacant residence Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: RS-1 Residential West: RS-1 & RS-2 Residential South: RS-1 & OW Residential & vacant property East: RS-1 & CO Residential & vacant property Thoroughfares/Streets: Montague Avenue is defined as a “major collector” and is designed to carry traffic at
    • moderate speeds to connect arterials to local streets Beacon Street is defined as a “local street” which carries light neighborhood traffic at lower speeds and generally connects to collector streets.Zoning History: The property has been a part of the city limits since at least 1949 with little change in zoning and use to the immediate area.Applicable Regulations: Allowed uses for this property can be found in Section 310 (Use Table) of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 511.B of the Zoning Ordinance requires two off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit.Development Standards: Residential development setbacks are outlined in Section 501 of the Zoning Ordinance. All required off-street parking and the connection(s) to a public right-of-way are required to be paved as defined in Section 511.F.3 of the Zoning Ordinance.Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood for the subject properties with a Transitional Zone located directly south on Beacon Street as a buffer to Commercial envisioned areas further south.Related Comp PlanExcerpts: “Create new physical connections to neighborhoods lined with transitional and intermediate uses." "Promote neighborhood diversity and security by encouraging a mix of age, income, and housing choices within San Angelos neighborhoods.” "Encourage in-fill development sensitive to the existing and desired content of the area” “Encourage the re-use of vacant buildings in the city. Carefully integrate new uses into older
    • areas, in a manner that encourages comfort, accessibility, efficiency and aesthetic gratification for resident and visitor alike.” “All residents within each neighborhood boundary should be able to meet their daily needs within a reasonable and accessible distance from their home.” "Variety of residential product types - multi-family, townhomes, courtyard homes, patio homes, etc." Establish transition areas to better "scale- down" intensity of use from commercial centers to neighborhoods." Special Information Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning to RS-2 will create little impact on the volume of traffic than if the property remained as-is, being that 4 of the lots are vacant at this time. Parking Requirements: New residential units require a minimum of two off-street parking spaces. All areas used for off-street parking shall be paved, per Section 511.F.3 of the Zoning Ordinance. Parking Provided: No paved parking spots at this time. Density: Surrounding uses are predominately of a low density residential nature. There are many vacant lots in the area. Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 22 Responses in Favor: 3 Responses in Opposition: 0Analysis: In order to approve this Zone change request, City Council members are first required to consider the following criteria:
    • 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment.5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.The applicant stated to Planning Staff that she wished to re-zone so that shecould convert an existing vacant building into a duplex. This zone change requestfrom RS-1 to RS-2 is a only a slight change from current zoning and Staff feelsthat the proposed change is in keeping with the 7 criteria listed above, all ofwhich will be explained in the following.A zone change to RS-2 will allow the owner and future owners to enjoy the sameresidential uses that are allowed by right as current zoning with just oneexception. Essentially, the only difference is that it allows a two family residenceor accessory apartment on the property. Because of this minute difference, theproposed zone change is consistent with both the Zoning Ordinance and theComprehensive Plan. Again, since there is little change from its current zoningthe immediate area will remain residential. The proposed zone change area liesamid an older, more established low-density residential area with large sectionsof undeveloped land nearby to the east and north. Beacon Street dead ends
    • about 200 feet east of the property. As a major collector, Montague Street issituated west of the subject property and ties into East Houston HarteExpressway, located approximately 390 feet south of the property.The Comprehensive Plan calls for residential areas to be typified by a mix of housingstock, which in this case refers to the addition of a duplex, and for housing to be inclose proximity to commercial zones, which is also the case here. Two different useswere introduced nearby; in 1982, an area approximately 155 feet west of the subjectproperty was re-zoned from RS-1 to RS-2 to allow for a duplex. In 1985, SpecialPermit 1122 was given to allow for “a mobile home to be owner family occupiedand to have two residences on one zoning lot.” These illustrate a precedence bythe City Council to allow a mix of housing stock to the area, which was and still is inkeeping with the Comprehensive Plan as would allowing an additional zone changefrom RS-1 to RS-2 in this area.Conditions would remain relatively the same or may even improve should thezone change be approved. There are several vacant lots in and around thesubject property. The Vision Plan calls for the subject property to remain as‘Neighborhood’ in nature with a “Transitional” zoning district directly to the south.This “Transitional” zone creates a buffer between commercial areas furthersouth, which is an ideal situation in terms of the Vision Plan. Therefore, the zonechange request is consistent with aspects of the Vision Plan and will mostcertainly have a positive impact on current and future land uses. RS-2 zoninghere for a duplex could also encourage redevelopment and provideencouragement for future neighborhood development that would be compatiblewith surrounding uses, including Holiman Elementary School to the north of thisneighborhood and Producer’s Park to the northwest.This zoning request would have minimal negative impacts on the naturalenvironment, again, since there is a little change between RS-1 and RS-2 uses.The only perceivable difference would be that a minimum of two paved parkingspaces per dwelling unit and the access from the street to them are required perSection 511 of the Ordinance, but this would cause overall minimal runoff to thearea as would the construction of a larger building footprint. These would mostlikely not negatively affect neighboring properties.San Angelo is experiencing a need for increased housing stock as our populationhas been increasing. According to the United States Department of Commerce,population increased by nearly 5,000 between the years 2000 and 2010. 1 In thisinstance, an existing vacant house would be repurposed to provide more housingto assist with community need, so Criteria 6 would be met should the zonechange be approved.SmartAlso addressing community need is this: the proposed area is situated in whatcontains several potential components of a walk-able community from a Smart 1 www.quickfacts.census.gov (accessed 01/18/13).
    • Growth point of view. Smart Growth, can be defined as “development thatserves the economy, the community and the environment”2 and promotes strongneighborhoods through choices in transportation and housing. Smart Growth alsooffers a higher level of social interaction, reduced emissions caused byautomobile travel and greater opportunities for physical opportunity that arebrought about by higher pedestrian and bicycling uses. Both HolimanElementary north on Montague Street and Producer’s Park to the northwest off ofMagnolia Street are located less than 1/3 of a mile from the subject property.Commercial access exists less than a half a mile west from the subject propertyalong Bell Street. These are just three examples of current locations that arearesidents have reasonable pedestrian and bicycle access to.In addition to meeting Criteria 1-6, Staff feels this request is in keeping withCriteria 7. A rezone to RS-2 is most certainly a logical progression in terms ofdevelopment patterns. Again, the change is very slight from the current zoningand the Vision Plan calls for the area to remain residential. A rezone to RS-2would have little negative impact on the area, if any, and again, could helpencourage future development in a predictable, orderly manner which is exactlythe intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.Proposed Conditions N/AAttachments: Excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within the City of San Angelo; excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision map highlighting the subject property; and notification map highlighting responses from neighboring properties. citizen response letters; draft minutes from January 28, 2013 Planning Commission meeting; and 2 www.smartgrowthpa.org (accessed 01/22/13).
    • draft Ordinance.Presentation: Roxanne Johnston, PlannerReviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (01/21/13)
    • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo; changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYRE: Z 13-02: Debbie Clark WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governingbody for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law withreference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publicationand otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all propertyowners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area andin the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set outherein; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enactedby the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included withinChapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same ishereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generallyand the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 2008Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street andMontague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10,Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District.The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of theDirector of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove describedproperty shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code ofOrdinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:
    • SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.INTRODUCED on the 19th day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED ANDADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ____________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:________________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As To Content: Approved As To Form:_________________________ ________________________
    • AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • MINUTE RECORD OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, October 15, 2012 AT 9:00 AM IN THE SOUTH MEETING ROOM OF THE SAN ANGELO CONVENTION CENTER, 500 RIO CONCHO DRIVE, SAN ANGELO, TEXASPRESENT: Joe Grimes, Bill Lawrence, Jennifer Boggs, Darlene Jones, Bill WynneABSENT: Sebastian Guerrero (AE), Sam Tambunga (AE)STAFF: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Jeff Hintz, Planner Kevin Boyd, Planner Roxanne Johnston, PlannerB. Z 13-02: Debbie Clark A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS- 1) to Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to specifically allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts on the following property: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo.Roxanne Johnston came forward to present this item, consistent with the staffrecommendation of approval. There were 22 notifications sent out, with 3returned in favor and 0 returned in opposition of the request. She showed aseries of maps to the Commission members, illustrating the area in which thesubject property is located. She illustrated the tracts representing owners whowere in favor of this request. Ms. Johnston also reviewed the criteria ofapproval which the Zoning Ordinance requires to be considered in all zonechange cases. Ms. Johnston discussed that the Comprehensive Plandiscusses establishing a mix of housing within neighborhoods and encourages"neighborhood" development in this area, which staff feels this would meet.This is especially so when realizing that there is an area for "transitional"development immediately adjacent to the property.The area is largely developed in a traditional neighborhood style, withinfrastructure and a street network largely reflective of - and appropriate for -
    • this type of development. There is a school in this neighborhood area, alongwith a city park. There are a few businesses in the area that help promote awalkable community. Staff feels a minor change in land use fits in and meetsall of the criteria which are required for consideration in this area as outlined inthe Comprehensive Plan.There were no questions for Ms. Johnston.Debbie Clark, the proponent, came forward to speak in favor of this request.She would like to develop this area now and in the future.There was no one else in attendance who desired to speak on this item.Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Bill Wynne and seconded byJennifer Boggs. Motion passed unanimously, 5-0.
    • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo; changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYRE: Z 13-02: Debbie Clark WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governingbody for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law withreference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publicationand otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all propertyowners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area andin the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set outherein; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enactedby the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included withinChapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same ishereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generallyand the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 2008Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street andMontague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10,Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District.The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of theDirector of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove describedproperty shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code ofOrdinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment: SEVERABILITY:
    • The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.INTRODUCED on the 19th day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED ANDADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ____________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:________________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As To Content: Approved As To Form:_________________________ ________________________AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • City of San AngeloMemo Meeting Date: February 19, 2013 To: City Council members From: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner Subject: Z 13-03 Tom Green County: A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for commercial opportunities as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property: Location: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo. Purpose: Approval of this request would zone the property Neighborhood Commercial (CN) Contacts: Judge Michael D. Brown 325-653-3318 Jeff Hintz, Planner 325-657-4210 Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo Z 13-03: Tom Green County AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
    • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY Summary: The City Council may: (1) Approve the proposed zone change; or (2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or (3) Deny the proposed zone change. Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone change. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this request 5-0 at the January 28, 2013 Meeting.History and Background: General Information Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential (RS-1) Existing Land Use: Vacant office building and parking lot Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: CG/CH Various retail establishments West: RS-1 Mobile Home Park South: RS-1 Church & single-family residences East: CN & RS-1 Church & single-family residences
    • Thoroughfares/Streets: Pulliam Street & North Bell Street are defined as "arterial streets," and designed to connect collector streets to freeways and other arterials carrying large volumes of traffic at high speeds. Access is secondary and mobility is the primary function of these streets.Zoning History: Special Permit 200 approved in August of 1966 allowed the construction of a "welfare building" in an RS-1 zoning district.Applicable Regulations: Allowed uses for this property can be found in Section 310 (Use Table) of the Zoning OrdinanceDevelopment Standards: Section 502 of the Zoning Ordinance covers general development standards for the property. In CN districts, “Type 1 Outdoor Display shall be allowed adjacent to a principal building wall and extending to a distance no greater than 5 feet from the wall. Such storage shall not be permitted to block windows, entrances or exits, and shall not impair the ability of pedestrians to use the building.”Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood CenterComp Plan Excerpts: Within the Comprehensive Plan, Goal 3 of “Neighborhoods” is to “improve the relationship between adjacent commercial and residential properties”. CG/CH zoning currently borders the RS-1 properties, a CN zoning would be a more suitable and less harsh buffer between the two. “Commercial properties tend to be organized in a single use, isolated pattern of development. This form generates little synergy between businesses and land uses and often results in incompatibility.” “All residents within each neighborhood boundary should be able to meet their daily needs within a reasonable and accessible distance from their home.”
    • “Promote better transition between nearby commercial and residential use of land and buildings.” “Rezone or remove any CG/CH zoning from adjacent to existing neighborhoods." “Require a buffer separating commercial, industrial, or agricultural zoned lands from neighborhoods.” “Establish transition areas between commercial areas and nearby neighborhoods.” “Organize commercial uses in nodes to avoid deteriorating corridors.”Special Information Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning from residential to commercial generally will add traffic to an area, however given the past zoning history on the property, this residential property has functioned as commercial property for decades. Parking Requirements: Section 511 of the Zoning Ordinance covers parking standards and requirements vary by proposed usage(s). Parking Provided: It appears off-street parking is available on this lot; the number of spots will depend upon lot orientation and future building configuration. Density: This general area is of medium density residential and higher intensity commercial uses that are of a lower density. Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 17 Responses in Favor: 0 Responses in Opposition: 0
    • Analysis: In order to approve this zone change request, the City Council members are first required to consider the following criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council. 2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land. 4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment. 5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment. 6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need. 7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community. The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. In looking at this proposal, Planning staff has found that a CN zoning district is compatible with the plans and policies in place for the community and that the zone change is consistent with the zoning ordinance. This particular property has functioned as a public building in some fashion for nearly 50 years despite the RS-1 zoning. This area between Pulliam Street and Koberlin Street is a mixed use are with a multitude of varying uses. Houses, churches, and some lower intensity commercial opportunities make sense; the plans and policies in place for the community recognize this need for neighborhood serving businesses that a CN zoning district will allow for. Introducing a more intensive zoning district would not be appropriate for this area given the intensive land uses allowed for in CG/CH zoning that is present on
    • Pulliam. A CN zoning designation will provide a suitable buffer into theneighborhoods that are prevalent to the south of this subject property withoutdiminishing the ability for this property to develop. At the same time, a CN zonewill also allow the responsible and sustainable development of theneighborhoods to the south. This zone change request is certainly in line with theintent of the Zoning Ordinance as responsible & predictable development forproperties both new and in the future is exactly the intent of the ZoningOrdinance.Staff believes that the CN zoning in this area is compatible with the surroundingarea; as previously mentioned, the lower intensity commercial opportunities thatare allowed within this zoning district have high potential to be an asset to theneighborhood in both the short and long term. While not all types of commercialactivities would be appropriate for this particular property (given the proximity tothe neighborhood, churches, and other lower intensity businesses) staff believessome lower intensity neighborhood serving businesses would be a fit that iscompatible with the surrounding area. Several properties to the south of thisgeneral area provide prime opportunities for some infill development; some newbusinesses that serve the area may have the potential to revitalize this area andusher in the infill development.This area is envisioned within the Comprehensive Plans Vision Map as a"Neighborhood Center." CN zoning fits in this vision. Neighborhood Centerenvisioned areas are designed to compliment neighborhoods with opportunitiesfor higher density residential opportunities and some lower intensity, lower scalecommercial opportunities. In this case, the Neighborhood Center envisioned areaprovides these development opportunities, and serves as a buffer from the"Industrial" and higher intensity "Commercial" envisioned areas just to thenorthwest of this area. Since this particular zone change is in harmony with theComprehensive Plan, there is no need for an amendment to the ComprehensivePlan to approve this request.In addition, staff does not believe the impact on the natural environment will bedetrimentally affected through the approval of this zone change. While someimpact due to storm water runoff will certainly be taking place (since the propertyis already improved) staff is unable to find any other negative environmentalconsequences that will result from this zone change. Staff also believes this zonechange request has potential to serve a community need in this particular area.Pulliam Street offers multiple opportunities for higher intensity commercialdevelopment in the CG/CH zoning district in this area, however the opportunitiesfor neighborhood serving, walkable businesses in this area are less prevalent.From this standpoint, staff believes this proposal for CN zoning will help to fill acommunity need and be a benefit to the area.Staff finds that a CN zoning district on the subject property will create an orderlydevelopment pattern that is consistent with the surrounding area. As one travels
    • south from Pulliam along Bell Street, the character of the area is much lessintense and becomes solely residential fairly quickly. Staff feels anything moreintensive in this area has the potential to upset this balance and encroach into along standing neighborhood. It should be mentioned that this neighborhood hasbeen zoned as RS-1 since approximately 1954 and for the most part hasdeveloped as such with little commercial encroachment. Staff finds is necessaryto protect and promote the current and future growth of this neighborhood; theintroduction of CN zoning will allow this to occur while serving the needs of theresidents of this neighborhood at the same time. Neighborhood serving, walkablebusinesses will serve the neighborhood in this area both now and in the future;the goals of infill, walkable development are highly in line with the CitysComprehensive Plan and sound neighborhood development principles. Staffbelieves this request will be a responsible addition, that is in harmony with theneighborhood and will only aid in the future development of the area.Proposed Conditions N/AAttachments: excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within the City of San Angelo; excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision Map highlighting the subject property; draft minutes from 01/28/13 Planning Commission meeting; and Draft Ordinance.Presentation: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services.
    • C. Z 13-03: Tom Green County A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for commercial opportunities as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo.Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner, came forward to present this request, consistentwith the staff recommendation of approval. Mr. Hintz began by revealing that 17notifications were sent out on this request, and 0 were received in favor or inopposition to this request. Mr. Hintz explained that Tom Green County is looking tosell this property. Mr. Hintz revealed that the Vision Plan map calls for"neighborhood center" at this location. A number of photographs were shown onand around the site. There are two churches in close proximity to this location, anda large neighborhood, which is mostly developed. The Comprehensive Planencourages buffer zones to be located between commercial properties andresidential neighborhoods. This property is in a prime location to provide such abuffer zone, and the proposal is consistent with that idea. There is a mix of zoningdistricts in the area, as well as a special permit in place which would allow a"welfare building" on the property - which is what the county utilized that site for atone time. He referred back to the criteria of approval which Ms. Johnston reviewedin depth in the previous case. Mr. Hintz also reviewed several excerpts from thecitys Comprehensive Plan which supports this type of zoning at this location. Thisproposal is consistent with the Citys plans and policies. Staff believes this type ofzoning is suitable for this area and is a good fit as opposed to heavier types ofcommercial zoning. This does follow development patterns for this area. Staff seeslittle anticipated effect on the natural environment, especially when considering thatthe building is already constructed and in place.Bill Lawrence asked for clarification regarding the buffer zone placement at thislocation and addressed the opportunity for a better and more appropriate transitionto be placed at this site. The "neighborhood center" is intended for higher-densityresidential development, and so the current zoning does not work in line with thatintention.Bill Wynne stated his opinion that this would correct the zoning that has long beenin place.Judge Mike Brown, with Tom Green County, came forward to speak in favor of thisrequest. He stated that their objective is to have the zoning changed to somethingmore marketable in order to offer it for sale down the road. The building is currentlyvacant.There were no other comments in favor or in opposition of the request.
    • Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Joe Grimes and seconded byJennifer Boggs. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.
    • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYRE: Z 13-03: Tom Green County WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governingbody for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law withreference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publicationand otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all propertyowners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area andin the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set outherein; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enactedby the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included withinChapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same ishereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generallyand the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 318North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North BellStreet and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition,Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo,shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Neighborhood Commercial (CN)District.The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of theDirector of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove describedproperty shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code ofOrdinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.
    • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYRE: Z 13-03: Tom Green County WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governingbody for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law withreference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publicationand otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all propertyowners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area andin the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set outherein; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enactedby the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included withinChapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same ishereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generallyand the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 318North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North BellStreet and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition,Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo,shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Neighborhood Commercial (CN)District.The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of theDirector of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove describedproperty shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code ofOrdinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.
    • SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment: SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.INTRODUCED on the 19th day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED ANDADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ____________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:________________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As To Content: Approved As To Form:_________________________ ________________________AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment: SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.INTRODUCED on the 19th day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED ANDADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ____________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:________________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As To Content: Approved As To Form:_________________________ ________________________AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • City of San AngeloMemo Meeting Date: February 19, 2013 To: City Council members From: Roxanne Johnston, Planner Subject: Z 13-04 Abel Fernandez. A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for commercial opportunities as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property: Location: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo. Purpose: Approval or modification of this request by the Planning Commission would forward that recommendation to City Council for a final decision on the matter. Contacts: Abel Fernandez, property owner 325-482-0946 Roxanne Johnston, Planner 325-657-4210 Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE
    • WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYSummary: The City Council may: (1) Approve this zone change request from RS-1 to RS-2 which would allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts; or (2) Modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be more appropriate; or (3) Deny this zoning request from RS-1 to RS-2.Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed zone change.On January 28, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this requestby a unanimous vote of 5-0.History and Background: General Information Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential (RS-1) Existing Land Use: Vacant residential Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: RS-1 Single-Family Residential West: RS-1 Single-Family Residential South: RS-1 Single-Family Residential East: RS-1 Single-Family Residential
    • Thoroughfares/Streets: East 14th Street is defined as a “collector street” which provides direct access to residential, commercial and other land uses. Wade Street is defined a "local street" and is designed to carry light traffic at lower speeds and generally connects to collector streets. East Main Street is defined as an “arterial street” and is designed to connect collector streets to freeways and other arterials carrying large volumes of traffic at high speeds. Access is secondary and mobility is the primary function of these streets.Zoning History: Residential as early as 1939.Applicable Regulations: Allowed uses for this property can be found in Section 310 (Use Table) of the Zoning Ordinance. . Refer to off-street parking standards, per Section 511. Section 602. “B. No nonconforming structure may be enlarged, expanded or extended in such a manner that it shall be made more nonconforming… A non-conforming structure may be enlarged expanded or extended so long as the nonconforming feature is not enlarged, expanded or extended, thereby making the structure more nonconforming.”Development Standards: Section 502. Nonresidential Development Standards Neighborhood Commercial (CN) requires a 25 feet front setback for commercial structures. No side or rear setback are required in commercial districts unless the lot abuts a residential district or use, where a minimum of 10 feet is required.
    • Section 504 of the Zoning Ordinance covers outdoor storage and display. Aside from Type 1 outdoor display, no other outside storage is allowed here. A.1. “Type 1 Outdoor Display shall be allowed adjacent to a principal building wall and extending to a distance no greater than 5 feet from the wall. Such storage shall not be permitted to block windows, entrances or exits, and shall not impair the ability of pedestrians to use the building. E.1. “Unless specifically authorized elsewhere… all outdoor storage and display shall be located outside the public right-of-way and/or at least 15 feet from the back edge of the adjacent curb or street pavement. Section 509. Fences A.1. “A privacy fence shall be required where the side or rear lot line of a nonresidential use is adjacent to either of the following. a. A residential district boundary other than the R&E District. b. An existing residential use.Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood Center & NeighborhoodComp Plan Excerpts: Within the Comprehensive Plan, Goal 3 of “Neighborhoods” is to “improve the relationship between adjacent commercial and residential properties”. “All residents within each neighborhood boundary should be able to meet their daily needs within a reasonable and accessible distance from their home.” “Promote better transition between nearby commercial and residential use of land and buildings.”
    • “Establish transition areas between commercial areas and nearby neighborhoods.” “Address issues related to the transition of older homes into offices, including parking and compatibility with surrounding areas.” Special Information Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning from residential to commercial use will generally add traffic to an area, but due to the small lot size and that CN is the least intensive of commercial zoning, potential businesses locating there will most likely yield little traffic than would more intensive uses. Parking Requirements: Section 511 of the Zoning Ordinance covers parking standards; the requirement varies depending on the proposed usage(s). The requirement for a tax service establishment, for example, would be 1 space paved per 300ft2 gross floor area. Parking Provided: It appears off-street parking opportunity is available on this lot; the number of spots will depend upon lot orientation and future building configuration. Density: This general area is of light to medium density residential with lower density businesses outside of the current RS-1 zone. The zone change request complies with the Vision Plan, which calls for a continuation of the future development of this area as “Neighborhood Center." Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 13 Responses in Favor: 0 Responses in Opposition: 0Analysis:
    • In order to approve this zone change request, the City Council members are firstrequired to consider the following criteria:1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment.5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.The subject property is located on the fringes of an older RS-1 zoning districtwithin 300 feet of North Main Street. The applicant is planning to operate a taxservice business from the property and seeks to repurpose a vacant house to doso. Atmos Energy, a planned development, is located near the property to thenortheast. There are a variety of mixed uses and zoning to the east andsoutheast of the subject property which include an assisted living and retirementfacilities. To the north, within walking distance of well under ½ a mile, are avariety of businesses that support neighborhood services such as restaurantsand car repair shops. Near the same area to the north are more intense landuses (CG/CH) that allow for heavy land use, such as junk yards; althoughcertainly not allowed on the subject property. In the future, the Vision Plan callsfor CG/CH zoning districts to be phased out.
    • In looking at this proposal, Planning Staff has found that a CN zoning district iscompatible with the plans and policies in place for the community and that thezone change is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Staff feels this request iscompatible with and appropriate to the surrounding area. A CN zoning district liesless than 35 feet from the southeastern section of the property. The Vision Plancalls for about 1/3 of the subject property to the east to be zoned “NeighborhoodCenter” with the remaining staying “Residential.” Due to the size of this property,the nature of businesses that could locate there in the future are constricted bythe lot size and limited area for parking, so this property use will likely remainsmaller and less intensive in nature and would generate little traffic to the area.Residential near CN zoning which allows lower intensity commercialopportunities make sense; the plans and policies in place for the communityrecognize this need for neighborhood serving businesses that a CN zoningdistrict will allow for. With the subject propertys proximity to North Main Street tothe east, the area has already seen a variety of change.The second possible challenge is that a portion of a neighboring residence islocated on the western side of subject property and is legally non-conforming asit has been there since 2000. The proposed zone change would necessitate theconstruction of an opaque fence between the residence to the west andbusinesses located on the subject property. According to Section 502 of theZoning Ordinance, there can be no fewer than 10 feet between the proposed useand a residence. There is currently a 4’ chain link fence between the building onthe subject property and the neighboring residence to the west.Staff believes that the CN zoning in this area is compatible with the surroundingarea. As previously mentioned, the lower intensity commercial opportunities thatare allowed within this zoning district have high potential to be an asset to theneighborhood in both the short and long term. While not all types of commercialactivities would be appropriate for this particular property, given the lot size andproximity to the neighborhood and other lower intensity businesses, staff believessome lower intensity neighborhood serving businesses would be a fit that iscompatible with the surrounding area. Since this particular zone change is inharmony with the Comprehensive Plan, there is no need for an amendment tothe Comprehensive Plan to approve this request.Staff does not believe the impact on the natural environment will be detrimentallyaffected through the approval of this zone change. Staff is unable to find anynegative environmental consequences that will result from this zone change.Given that semi-industrial uses are not allowed within CN zoning, the zonechange will not bring about the noises and odors often associated with a heaviercommercially zoned district. Staff also believes this zone change request haspotential to serve a community need in this particular area, even given theexample of the applicant’s desire to locate a tax service business there. Otherbusinesses that would be a fit for the same property include those of a
    • community services nature and a small new or used retail sales and servicesbusiness such as product repair, for example (since the property is relativelysmall) to name just a few.Staff finds that a CN zoning district on the subject property will create an orderlydevelopment pattern that is consistent with the surrounding area. CG/CH, RS-2,CG, and CN zoning currently borders the RS-1 properties. Staff feels anythingmore intensive in this area has the potential to upset this balance and encroachinto a long standing neighborhood. This neighborhood has been zonedresidential since at least 1939 and has experienced, for the most part, a sensiblemix of zoning around it. Staff finds it necessary to protect and promote thecurrent and future growth of this neighborhood and the introduction of CN zoningwill allow this to occur while serving the needs of the residents of thisneighborhood both now and in the future. The goals of infill and walk-abledevelopment are highly in line with the Citys Comprehensive Plan and are inharmony with the neighborhood. Lastly, it is possible that this development mayserve to aid in future area development.Proposed Conditions N/AAttachments: excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within the City of San Angelo; excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision Map highlighting the subject property; and draft minutes from January 28, 2013 Planning Commission meeting; and draft OrdinancePresentation: Roxanne Johnston, PlannerReviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (01/21/13)
    • MINUTE RECORD OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, January 28, 2013 AT 9:00 AM IN THE SOUTH MEETING ROOM OF THE SAN ANGELO CONVENTION CENTER, 500 RIO CONCHO DRIVE, SAN ANGELO, TEXASPRESENT: Joe Grimes, Bill Lawrence, Jennifer Boggs, Darlene Jones, Bill WynneABSENT: Sebastian Guerrero (AE), Sam Tambunga (AE) STAFF: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Jeff Hintz, Planner Kevin Boyd, Planner Roxanne Johnston, Planner D. Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS- 1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for a tax service business as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo. Roxanne Johnston, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff recommendation of approval. Ms. Johnston noted that there were 13 notifications sent out on this request, with 0 returned in favor or in opposition to the request. The subject property is a residential structure, which sits on the edge of a neighborhood and near Main Street, which has a mix of zoning district types. There are also some empty lots in this area. The eastern section of the subject property terminates at an alley bifurcating the neighborhood, creating a triangular shaped property. There is a single-family residential area in and around this location, and the residential usage of the area dates back to 1939. The subject property is located on the fringe of an RS-1 neighborhood. The desire is to have a tax service business at this location. There are several zoning districts within a 1/2 mile of this location. A CN zoning district would be compatible with the plans and policies of the city. She again referred to the need and appropriateness for a buffer between the mix of uses nearby and this large residential area. The concept of "neighborhood" is for low-impact business, of which this is one. CN is the least intensive type of commercial zoning. The small lot size does limit naturally the types of businesses which could locate on the lot. However, the scale of a neighborhood center would be appropriate. There is a CN zone currently in existence less than 35 from the subject property. The zone change does trigger placement of a 6 opaque privacy fence to screen from the residential area nearby. The request is consistent with the Vision Plan map as well as the city plans and criteria outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. Businesses that are allowed in CN allow small new or used retail sales or services, along with office usage. More intensive zoning
    • would potentially upset the balance and encroach into a large and long-established neighborhood.Darlene Jones asked if this business would strictly be a business or if it wouldalso be a residential use. It was responded that it would be allowed to be abusiness only - this type of zoning would not allow residential living.Jennifer Boggs also asked a couple of questions regarding the parking.Fortunately, the floor-area ratio limit for this site would limit much of an additionalexpansion, meaning that parking would not likely need to increase by more thanone space in the future.The proponent, Abel Fernandez, came forward and spoke in favor of thisrequest. He stated that he does not currently have any employees.Joe Grimes asked if the stipulations that were required were fine with theapplicant. Mr. Fernandez expressed his acceptance of the requirements.No one else came forward to speak on this request.Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Darlene Jones and seconded byJoe Grimes. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.
    • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo; changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYRE: Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governingbody for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law withreference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publicationand otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all propertyowners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area andin the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set outherein; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enactedby the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included withinChapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same ishereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generallyand the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 2008Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street andMontague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10,Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo; shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows:Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District.The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of theDirector of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove describedproperty shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code ofOrdinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment: SEVERABILITY:
    • The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.INTRODUCED on the 19 day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED ANDADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ____________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:________________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As To Content: Approved As To Form:_________________________ ________________________AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • City of San AngeloMemo Meeting Date: March 5, 2013 To: City Council members From: Kevin Boyd, Planner Subject: Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation, a request for a zone change from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) to allow for activities allowed within MH zoning districts, on the following property: Location: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo. Purpose: Approval of this request would zone the property Heavy Manufacturing (MH). Contacts: COSA Development Corporation, owner 325-653-7197 Kevin Boyd, Planner 325-657-4210 Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from
    • Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY Summary: The City Council may: (1) Approve the proposed zone change as requested; or (2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or (3) Deny the proposed zone change. Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone change.History and Background: General Information Existing Zoning: Light Manufacturing (ML) Existing Land Use: Undeveloped land Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: Light Manufacturing (ML) Angelo Achieves West: Light Manufacturing (ML) Undeveloped land South: Unincorporated Undeveloped land East: Light Manufacturing (ML) Undeveloped land Thoroughfares/Streets: FM 380 is classified as an ‘arterial street’ which is designed to be a major thoroughfare that carries heavy traffic to points of interest throughout the city. Gateway Drive is classified as a "local street" and is designed to carry light traffic at lower speeds and generally connects to collector streets. Zoning History: The property was annexed into the city in November 1997 and later rezoned to Light Manufacturing (ML) in December 1997, refer to case Z 97-51. 2
    • Applicable Regulations: 316.B.1 of the Zoning Ordinance states, ..."If the uses routinely subject the surrounding area to noxious or malodorous impacts, they are considered heavy manufacturing and production.." Development Standards: All required off-street parking and the connection(s) to a public right-of-way are required to be paved. Vision Plan Map: Industrial Related Comp Plan Excerpts: Intent of Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan is to, “[dedicate areas for] supporting the local economy while mitigating some of their potentially undesirable secondary effects on nearby residences.” Industrial section goal one of the Comprehensive Plan is to "Organize LULUs (Locally Undesirable Land Uses) into clusters." The purpose of this goal is to: "Cluster potentially hazardous industries into a limited number (given the size of San Angelo) of larger, isolated areas will minimize negative effects on residential areas, while balancing access to these businesses within the region, rather than putting all of them into one location."Special Information Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning to a more intensive industrial district has the potential to generate additional traffic than if the property remained as-is. However, given the limited number of visitors to industrial zoned properties, and ease of access to the highway for transport, staff is not concerned with the development of this property as heavy industrial. Parking Requirements: Vary depending upon the use of the property, see Section 511. Parking Provided: Currently, no parking exist on the site, though it is a sizable tract. 3
    • Density: Predominantly large tracts of undeveloped land in the surrounding areas. The Vision Plan also calls for a continuation of the future development of this area as Industrial, creating an industrial hub. Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 1 Responses in Favor: 0 Responses in Opposition: 1Analysis: In order to approve this zone change request, the Planning Commission members are first required to consider the following criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council. 2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land. 4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment. 5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment. 6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need. 4
    • 7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.The zone change request was initiated in an effort to market the properties to variousindustrial opportunities. The 89 acre tract consists of three adjacent properties zonedLight Manufacturing (ML), and are part of the City’s Business and Industrial Center –located in the northeast part of town. Generally speaking, the proposal for HeavyManufacturing (MH) will allow for the most intense and noxious possible within the citylimits. Given the extreme nature of allowed uses, careful consideration was given informulating this recommendation. The Vision Plan envisions the subject property, andareas to the north, east and west to remain industrial. Industrial allows for clusteringpotentially hazardous industries into limited, isolated parts of the city. Although portionsto the south calls for neighborhood development, no residences currently exist alongFM 280 or anywhere within 3/4 of a mile of the site. This particular property is isolatedfrom the surrounding area through the large tracts of land in the area. Loud noises andthe occasional odd smells that may potentially be emitted from property are not likely tobother neighboring properties, given their distance from the site. After carefullyassessing the factors to the proposal for a zone change, staff has determined that sucha location would be appropriate for intense uses, for this and other reasons articulatedbelow.A zone change from ML to MH is an appropriate transition given the location of the site.In some respect, the two zoning districts are similar in terms of allowed uses. Oneexception is that MH provides opportunities for heavy processing and manufacturingthat is inherently noxious and dangerous due to the chemicals or processes involved.Other uses allowed in MH zoning include warehouse and freight movement, wholesaletrade, heavy manufacturing and production and fabrication of wearing apparel includingboots and shoes, and mining and waste-related uses as conditional uses. Since the siteis several miles from populated areas, noxious sounds and odors will likely go unnoticedby a vast majority of people who visit and live within San Angelo.This request for MH zoning is compatible with much of the surrounding area. The landsurrounding the site remains largely undeveloped and varies from open plains to a mixof light to heavy brush. Two noticeable nearby structures are Angelo Achieves, whichoccupies the property directly to the north, and a vacant distribution center at theintersection of North Loop 306 Frontage and Venture Drive. In November 2012, CityCouncil approved a request for a "Major Entertainment Event" to temporarily develop atract on the properties immediately north of the subject property, for the Lucas Oil Track.No other structures exist within 1/2 a mile of the site. The fact that the site is in one ofthe most isolated and undeveloped areas allows COSADC opportunities to develop thesite for the most intensive uses, with the least potential impacts. 5
    • As referenced above, ML and MH zoning districts are very similar. The exception is thatMH zoning allows for greater flexibility in the intent as it relates to intensity and the levelof noxious uses allowed. Heavy manufacturing and production, for example, is allowedin MH zoning. In ML districts, no vibrations can be produced which are transmittedthrough the ground at any point beyond the lot line. There are also measures to reducenoise and emission of airborne particles. Conceivably, with a more intense MH zoning,these uses would be allowed, subject to applicable state and federal environmentalregulations in regards to environmental quality.Depending on the intensity of the use, the transition may have an effect on the naturalenvironment. Staff believes that efforts to cluster these high intense uses into a fewisolated areas follows the goal of the Comprehensive Plan, and diminishes potential forany unforeseen negative impacts. A zoning of this intensity would not normally beappropriate near areas identified as ‘Neighborhood’ but it has, for some time, beenplanned and dedicated for intense industrial uses (for many of the reasons mentionedabove), staffs feels the proposed zoning is appropriate. The site measures over 2,300feet from any significant water feature – the nearest is the Concho River, which flowwest to east into the O.H. Ivie Reservoir (away from the city). Due to isolation of thisproperty and the area in general, staff is confident that there will be a suitable bufferfrom residential development.The community needs zoning districts that are this intense in nature to be isolated fromresidences and highly trafficked areas. Few people will ever see the outdoor storagethat is possible in this zoning district, and those who are subjected to it are notresidences but rather industrial users of property themselves. The Comprehensive Planseeks to buffer residences from the tendency of industry to have outdoor storage ofmaterials and goods. The request is consistent with aspects of the Vision Plan and assuch, will not require amendment to the plan.In the manufacturing and production field, materials and freight need quick access tohighways for transport to other locations. There are not many areas in the city that areisolated from residences and that provide for quick access to a highway, which is vital inthe manufacturing field. North Loop 306, a freeway, measures less than 1/3 of a mile, tothe west of the site. Still, given its short distance from the Loop – it is somewhatremoved from the thoroughfare (separated by a 55 acre tract zoned for ML) and is anideal fit for the most noxious of uses, which shields potential effects from passingmotorists along the freeway. The request also offers a nice transition of permissibleuses (ML zoning between the highway and the proposed MH district), in that regard.The property is near the edge of the city-limits – positioned nearly 2,000 feet to the eastof the boundary – which allows for easy access to routes that led outside of the city.Quick access to the highway system, while not abutting highly trafficked residential orcommercial thoroughfares, makes this one of the safest locations within the city limits tolocate heavy industries. 6
    • Proposed Conditions N/AAttachments: Excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within the City of San Angelo; Excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; Aerial photo, highlighting subject property; Excerpt from the comprehensive plan vision map highlighting the subject property; Excerpt of the favor/opposition notification map; Citizen Response; Draft minutes from 02/18/13 Planning Commission meeting; and Draft Ordinance.Presentation: Kevin Boyd, PlannerReviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (02/11/13) 7
    • 9
    • 10
    • 11
    • 12
    • D. Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation A request for approval of a zone change from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) to allow for activities allowed within MH zoning districts, on the following property: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo.Kevin Boyd, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staffrecommendation of approval. One notification was required to be sent, and one wasreceived in opposition to the request. Mr. Boyd described the subject property andits general location in the city. Mr. Boyd explained that the rquest complies with theVision Plan Map, which calls for "Industrial" at this location. The EconomicDevelopment Staff, working as representatives for the San Angelo DevelopmentCorporation, made this request because they are looking to diversify the offerings ofthe Industrial Park. MH zoning is very similar to the current ML zoning, but thesection being considered for this change is very remote (not highway frontage), andallows more flexibility and higher intensity. This is one of the most isolated andundeveloped parts of the city, and it would allow opportunities to develop asoriginally intended, far removed from neighborhoods and commercial corridors. Mr.Boyd explained that another rationale for approval is the fact that the property beingproposed is not within the direct line of siteBob Schneeman, the Interim Director of Economic Development, came forward tospeak in favor of this request. The infrastructure improvements in this area weredone in 2004, but little interest has so far been seen for developing the area. Theinflux of oilfield-related activity prompted Economic Development and COSADC tore-examine the allowed uses at this site in order to better bring activity to it - asinitially intended. There are a significant amount of deed restrictions on the propertyin addition to the zoning. Those could not be changed without approval of theproperty owners, and there is a design committee that oversees all developmentwithin the Industrial Park. They are willing to work with the property owner whowrote in as opposition, to skirt their property and to site operations appropriately.There has been interest from some businesses about locating in this park. Mr.Schneeman also expressed that there is some natural buffering due to a rather largedrainage easement that would prohibit buildings to be placed within it. In addition,there are plans for a street to be extended to the east, which would also create abuffer to the owner in opposition. As such, mitigation of negative impacts should begreatly reduced as opposed to most properties. Mr. Schneeman outlined some ofthe deed restrictions that are in place, prohibiting things such as feed lots, renderingplants, height restrictions (cell towers, for example), among other things.There was some additional discussion of the potential uses allowed in MH districtsand the specific use standards of ML districts that are different from MH districtregulations. There was also a question of utilizing a "buffer zone" for this business,
    • but staff reminded the Commission that zoning changes cannot carry conditions withthem.There were several questions asked of staff regarding the potential for future uses atthis location.John Dugan, with the Chamber of Commerce, came forward to speak in favor of thisrequest, stating that there were several types of interests in this location that wouldnot work under the current zoning. This would make the property more attractive.No one else came forward to speak in favor of this request.HR Wardlaw came forward to speak in opposition to this request, stating that theneighbor in this area needed to be "made whole" and that endangering this particularproperty owner was not the correct approach. He also stated that the original intentof the park was to function as an office park. He asked the Commission to keep thezoning as it is today.Bill Wynne stated that the nearby businesss issues could potentially be handled viaan air conditioning system. Jennifer Boggs discussed that the discussions about thepotential legal ramifications (privately) were not the responsibility of the Commissionmembers to oversee and handle/enforce. Joe Grimes explained that the Chamber,COSADC, Eco Dev, exist to bring in revenue to the city and market it in a way thatbrings industry into town rather than pushing it out into Tom Green County. BillLawrence considered the fact that, to have this industry somewhere in San Angelo, itshould be considered where the most appropriate place is in the city. Bill Lawrencealso suggested that replatting could change the boundaries, and staff agreed that itwould, but that it would have to precede any change of zoning.Motion, to approve, was made by Bill Wynne and seconded by Joe Grimes. Themotion passed by a motion of 4-1, with Darlene Jones in opposition to the change.
    • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYRE: Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governingbody for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law withreference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publicationand otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all propertyowners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area andin the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set outherein; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enactedby the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included withinChapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same ishereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generallyand the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 1020,1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo, shallhenceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Heavy Manufacturing (MH) District.The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of theDirector of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove describedproperty shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code ofOrdinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:
    • SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.INTRODUCED on the 5th day of March, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED ANDADOPTED on this the 19th day of March, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ____________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:________________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As To Content: Approved As To Form:_________________________ ________________________AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • City of San AngeloMemo Meeting Date: February 20, 2013 To: City Council members From: Roxanne Johnston, Planner Subject: Z 13-07: COSA Planning A request for approval of a zone change from a Planned Development (PD) zoning district to Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to specifically allow for “Household Living” as defined in Section 310 of the Zoning Ordinance on the following property: Location: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo. Purpose: Approval of this request would zone the property RS-1 Contacts: Roxanne Johnston, Planner 325-657-4210 Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo Z 13-07: COSA Planning AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE
    • WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a Single Family Residential (RS-1) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYSummary: The City Council may:(1) Approve this zone change request from PD to RS-1 which would allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS-1 zoning districts; or(2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or(3) Deny this zoning request from PD to RS-1.Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposedZone Change.On February 18, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval ofthis request by a unanimous vote of 5-0.History and Background:PD 06-01 was approved by City Council on June 20, 2006, whichencompassed this property and others that have since been rezoned toRS-1 on January 17, 2012 (cases Z11-23 & Z11-24). This PlannedDevelopment called for several community areas and single familyresidences that must generally conform to an RS-1 (Single FamilyResidential) District. The original developer of this PD has since gone outof business and the property has reverted back to the bank and then wasrecently sold to a private buyer.The subject property is the last remaining section of this PlannedDevelopment District. Originally, a clubhouse, pool, and other privateamenities were proposed to go along with the 118 single family homesites within this area and even more sites beyond. The intent was for it tofunction as a gated community. Once the developer went through the
    • bankruptcy process, First Financial Bank took control of the properties inthis area which had been under that developers ownership. In Decemberof 2011 the Planning Commission approved a zone change on adjacentproperties making up this Planned Development, resulting in a SingleFamily Residential (RS-1) zoning district.The bank did not wish to pursue a clubhouse and other amenities on thesubject property and the homeowners association is defunct, so staffbelieves a RS-1 zoning classification gives future developers the bestopportunity to make use of the property at the highest and best use.General Information Existing Zoning: Planned Development (PD) Existing Land Use: Vacant property Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: RM-1 undeveloped property West: R & E; undeveloped property County South: R&E undeveloped property East: RS-1 undeveloped property, vacant lots & residences Thoroughfares/Streets: Twin Mountain Drive is defined as an “arterial” street which is designed to connect collector streets to freeways and carries large volumes of traffic at high speeds. Access is secondary and mobility is the prime function of these streets. Zoning History: The area was annexed into the City in April of 2006. PD 06-01 was established June 20, 2006. This land was previously zoned Ranch & Estate (R & E). Applicable Regulations: Section 212.A.2.d. “An application for an amendment of the Official Zoning Map…shall only be filed by… the Planning Director, acting in his/her capacity as technical advisor to the Planning Commission.” Development Standards: Zoning Ordinance Section 501.A. Minimum Lot Area – 5,000 sq ft
    • Minimum Lot Dimensions – 50x100 Minimum Front Yard – 25 ft Minimum Side Yard – 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard – 20 ft Maximum Floor Area Ratio – 0.4 (40%) Maximum Height – 35 ft Vision Plan Map: NeighborhoodSpecial Information Traffic Concerns: There are currently no traffic concerns as this area has not been developed and has no “local” streets. Twin Mountain Drive currently ends at the northeast section of the subject property. Once the northern section of the property is developed, Twin Mountain Drive is projected to lie along the northern boundary of the subject property and will be an arterial which will connect with Sherwood Way to the northwest. The impact of future local streets will be determined as the area is subdivided and plans are submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The property experiences a variety of terrain, elevation, and washes that will certainly be impacted by any development. Parking Requirements: Zoning Ordinance Section 511.B. Two off-street parking spaces are required for each single-family residence. Section 511.D.1. “All required off-street parking spaces shall be located on the same lot or tract of land as the building and/or activity they are intended to serve” Section 511.F.3. “All areas used for required off-street parking shall be paved” Density: The property is currently undeveloped with no internal street access. Low density residential property lies to the north and east. Notification Required: Yes
    • Notifications Sent: 13 Responses in Favor: 2 Responses in Opposition: 0Analysis: In order to approve this Zone change request, City Council members are first required to consider the following criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council. 2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land. 4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment. 5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment. 6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need. 7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community. The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. Given the history of this property stated above whereby the original developer went out of business, a zone change to Single Family Residential would better fall in line with the plans, policies and Zoning Ordinance adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council. There are several reasons for this to hold true. To begin with, there is currently no financial backing to ensure the development of the several community buildings and open spaces
    • originally planned for in the Planned Development (PD) would occur.Either way, the development standards for both categories of residentialzoning (PD and RS-1) are very similar. Section 306.B.2 of the ZoningOrdinance states, ”It is intended that PD Districts conform as closely aspossible to established zoning and subdivision regulations…” Both zoningdistricts (the PD currently in place and the proposed RS-1rezone) requirethe same setback and height requirements as well as signage,landscaping and off-street parking.By doing nothing to the zoning, the property is not as consistent withsurrounding zoning as it would be if it were rezoned to RS-1. Futuredevelopers may have a hard time developing since this is currently aremnant from the original PD.A requirement of any PD is that the original plans approved as a conditionof the PD be adhered to and any changes would require a review. Section210.H.1 of the Zoning Ordinance states, “No building permit may beissued and no construction or development requiring a building permit andsituated within a PD District may commence unless a site plan has beenapproved for that phase of the project that is consistent with the approvedconcept plan. A site plan that is not consistent with the approved conceptplan and specific PD District ordinance shall not be approved.” Thesestatements illustrates that conditions of the PD must be met. This isvirtually impossible now given the changed circumstances now that thePD no longer exists in its entirety, so current zoning creates a specialcircumstance that could keep the area from developing and could makeland transactions less attractive to prospective buyers who would want tocreate their own plans. These developers may not wish to contribute to therequired common areas as originally envisioned when the developmentwas first conceived.Staff feels that a zone change would continue to be in line with theComprehensive Plan’s Vision map which calls for neighborhood in thisarea. Additionally, staff feels that a zone change continues to addresscommunity need, as it does under the current zoning, for creatingresidential opportunities here. As such, an amendment to the Vision Planwould not be required with this particular request.Although the original PD plan encompassed a large section beyond thesubject property, it theoretically would have ensured more consistencywith regard to building, street, and general layout design and designconcepts than a usual RS-1 zone would. As previously mentioned, thedevelopment standards would not change as a result of a zone change.Therefore, one could argue that there can now be a mix of developmentconcepts in the area which could allow for more diverse home stock. Sofar the development that has occurred since the recent zone changes to
    • surrounding the property has yielded in thoughtful and consistent development patterns, which is what the Zoning Ordinance seeks to create. It is possible, too, that new development patterns on the subject property could actually result in fewer residential lots than originally planned. For example, it is conceivable that a land-owner of the subject property would wish to keep the property in its natural state. Again, any development occurring within the proposed zoning district would be required to adhere to RS-1 development standards, so there is no chance of over-developing the subject property. This would also ensure consistent development patterns as directed in Criteria 7. Furthermore, Criteria 2 would be met because an amendment here would be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. It would also be compatible with surrounding zoning and therefore meets the objective of Criteria 3. In addressing environmental impacts resulting from this rezoning; second only to Ranch & Estate zoning districts (R&E), RS-1 creates the least use demand on the property. Whereas no heavier use zoning is planned for this area in the Vision Plan, any development or future subdivisions will most likely be reviewed by the City to ensure that environmental impacts are minimized. Also, until plans are made for the vacant property, it would not be possible to forecast the direct environmental impacts on this property that enjoys a variety of open space, gullies and topographic changes. With either zoning (PD or RS-1), this uncertainty would remain the same. To summarize, staff feels a zone change from PD to RS-1 on the subject property meets with all of the above criteria which include conformity with the Zoning Ordinance, plans and policies, compatibility with the surrounding area, and corrects changed conditions that resulted from the end of the original PD agreements. This proposal also does not create additional adverse impacts on the property than would the PD, it meets a community need by not requiring surrounding property owners to pay for the amenities and Homeowner’s Association fees set forth in the original PD plan, and ensures logical and consistent development patterns to protect the area from over development. Lastly, a zone change will most likely result in a logical and consistent pattern of residential development.Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within the City of San Angelo; excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property;
    • aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision map highlighting the subject property; original PD concept plan; notification map highlighting responses from neighboring properties; citizen response letters; draft minutes from February 18, 2013 Planning Commission meeting; and, draft Ordinance.Presentation: AJ Fawver, Planning ManagerReviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (02/11/13)
    • MINUTE RECORD OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGHELD ON MONDAY, February 18, 2013 AT 9:00 AM IN THE SOUTH MEETING ROOM OFTHE SAN ANGELO CONVENTION CENTER, 500 RIO CONCHO DRIVE, SAN ANGELO,TEXASPRESENT: Joe Grimes, Bill Lawrence, Jennifer Boggs, Darlene Jones, Bill WynneABSENT: Sebastian Guerrero (AE), Sam Tambunga (AE)STAFF: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner Kevin Boyd, Planner Roxanne Johnston, Planner C. Z 13-07: COSA Planning A request for approval of a zone change from a Planned Development (PD) zoning district to Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to specifically allow for “Household Living” as defined in Section 310 of the Zoning Ordinance on the following property: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo. Roxanne Johnston, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff recommendation of approval. 13 notifications were sent out on this request, 3 of which were returned in favor. There were no notifications returned in opposition to this request. Ms. Johnston gave some background on the area. Ms. Johnston explained that there is one remaining piece of this PD that remains in this area. The original plan called for a gated community, an HOA, and additional community amenities. Ms. Johnston explained the complications for each individual lot and individual owner, due to these requirements. This change has taken place throughout the other two pieces of the original PD district, and this would simply be the last piece, restoring all of the area to an RS-1 district, which is consistent with the Vision Plan Map category of "Neighborhood". The proposal is in line with development of the area, and activity in this area (by single, individual property owners, not an HOA) is increasing. All development must adhere to RS-1 development standards, so it would be consistent with the surrounding neighborhoods in the same general vicinity. There were no questions. No one came forward to speak in favor of this request. No one came forward to speak in opposition of this request. Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Jennifer Boggs and seconded by Bill Wynne. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.
    • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a Single Family Residential (RS-1) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTYRE: Z 13-07: COSA Planning WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governingbody for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law withreference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publicationand otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all propertyowners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area andin the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set outherein; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enactedby the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included withinChapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same ishereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generallyand the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: Anunaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. Thisproperty specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182,Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest SanAngelo, changing the zoning classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a SingleFamily Residential (RS-1) District;, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows:Single Family Residential (RS-1) District.The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of theDirector of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove describedproperty shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code ofOrdinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:
    • SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.INTRODUCED on the 5th day of March, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED ANDADOPTED on this the 19th day of March, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ____________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:________________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved As To Content: Approved As To Form:_________________________ ________________________AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • City of San Angelo Office of the City ClerkMemo Date: February 13, 2013 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Subject: th Agenda Item for March 5 Council Meeting Contact: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk, 657-4405 Caption: Regular Item First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending established boundaries of Single Member District 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS AMENDING THE ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCORPORATING NEWLY ANNEXED AREAS INTO SAID DISTRICT, PROVIDING FOR PRECLEARANCE AND ALL OTHER NECESSARY ACTIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE Summary: The City Council adopted two ordinances incorporating newly annexed areas in SMD 1. a. The public hearings were held on January 22, 2013 and February 5, 2013 and adopted an ordinance on February 5, 2013. The area annexed is 20 acres located west/southwest of the city at about the southern corner of the intersection of U.S. Highway 67 (Sherwood Way) and a southward projection of Appaloosa Trail, adjacent and contiguous to the present corporate limits of the city. The area is uninhabited and situated adjacent to an apartment development currently undergoing construction. b. The public hearings were held on February 5, 2013 and March 5, 2013 and adopted an ordinance on March 5, 2013. The area annex is 8.995 acres located west/southwest of the city at about northwest of mills pass drive, east of Community of Faith subdivision and southwest of Sam’s Club addition, adjacent and contiguous to the present corporate limits of the city. The area is uninhabited and situated adjacent to a growing residential subdivision. As part of the submission under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the annexations update and change to the established boundaries of single member districts shall be cleared through the Department of Justice. Both areas are uninhabited. The City will comply with all necessary requirements for the submission by adoption of this ordinance. Financial Impact: None. Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends updating the established boundary of SMD #1. Attachments: Annexation Map A and B, Proposed Ordinance, and Revised 2013 SMD Map  Page 1
    • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS AMENDING THE ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCORPORATING NEWLY ANNEXED AREAS INTO SAID DISTRICT, PROVIDING FOR PRECLEARANCE AND ALL OTHER NECESSARY ACTIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATEWHEREAS, the City of San Angelo is a Home Rule municipal corporation operatingunder a municipal charter that has been adopted as authorized by Article XI, Section 5 ofthe Texas Constitution; and,WHEREAS, pursuant to the City of San Angelo Charter, Section 3 entitled “Annexation”,the City Council shall have the power, after public hearing, of fixing the boundaries of theCity of San Angelo and to annex additional territory by ordinance; andWHEREAS, on February 5, 2013 and March 5, 2013, the City Council adoptedOrdinances #2013-02-021 and #2013-03-034, annexing certain uninhabited areas intothe City of San Angelo; andWHEREAS, it is now necessary to incorporate such areas into a Single Member Districtwithin the City of San Angelo in order to ensure future new residents of the right to vote;andWHEREAS, changes in single member districts constitute a change from prior practicesrequiring preclearance under the Federal Voting Rights Act.NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:SECTION 1: RECITALS INCORPORATED. The recitals set forth above are incorporatedinto the body of this Resolution as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.SECTION 2: DESIGNATION OF ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES: The boundaries ofSingle Member District 1 be, and are hereby, amended as set forth in Exhibit “A”,attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.SECTION 3: SUBMISSIONS TO THE UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: TheCity Clerk of the City of San Angelo, or her authorized agent, shall make suchsubmissions as are necessary to the United State Justice Department to seek pre-clearance approval.SECTION 4: NECESSARY ACTIONS: The Mayor and the City Clerk, in consultationwith the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actionsnecessary or appropriate to comply with the provisions of the San Angelo Code ofOrdinances, the Texas Election Code and any other Texas State or federal law incarrying out and designating established single member district boundaries for District 1,as amended, whether or not expressly authorized herein and all such actions of Cityofficials previously taken for said purposes are hereby ratified.
    • SECTION 5: SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall bedeemed to be severable in that if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to beinvalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.SECTION 6: EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective from and afteradoption of this ordinance.INTRODUCED on the 5th day of March, 2013, and finally PASSED, APPROVED andADOPTED on this the 19th day of March, 2013. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS _________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:_________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved as to Content: Approved as to Form:_________________________ __________________________Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
    • EXHIBIT “A” DESCRIPTION OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 1 FOR SAN ANGELO, TEXAS BY 2010 U. S. CENSUS P. L. 94-171 TRACT AND BLOCKTRACT / BLOCK TRACT / BLOCK TRACT / BLOCK001304 4008 001706 1034 001101 1098001303 5006 001706 1023 001101 1099001303 1004 001706 1037 001301 7006001304 4003 001706 1020 001707 1015001101 1075 001704 2187 001704 2182001101 1025 001101 1087 001101 2002001304 2000 001101 1046 001303 1008001101 1114 001101 1065 001200 6038001101 1084 001706 1038 001101 1081001101 1097 001707 1002 001101 1092001101 1053 001101 2008 001707 2029001101 1104 001301 6003 001101 1064001101 1041 001101 1089 001301 7007001707 1044 001101 1095 001707 1008001707 2039 001101 1096 001301 7002001101 1045 001101 3004 001101 1112001101 1027 001101 2004 001101 1060001101 1036 001200 6039 001101 2009001303 3005 001303 3006 001101 2001001707 1011 001301 7014 001301 7000001707 1026 001101 1109 001304 1000001707 1043 001707 2016 001101 1011001707 1010 001706 1011 001101 1009001706 1030 001706 1018 001101 3002001304 2005 001706 1041 001101 1023001303 3003 001706 1019 001707 1034001303 2005 001707 2037 001101 1103001303 3008 001101 1010 001303 2008001303 2001 001304 1005 001303 3010001303 5005 001707 2038 001101 1115001303 5002 001707 1001 001101 2007001304 4007 001707 1012 001101 2000001707 1021 001101 1069 001101 1091001707 2023 001101 1068 001101 1111001707 1042 001101 1118 001303 4002001707 1032 001101 1078 001101 1090001706 1014 001303 1010 001303 2003
    • 001303 2006 001707 2019 001304 1009001303 4005 001303 1005 001101 1048001303 1001 001303 4009 001101 1116001704 1095 001707 2015 001101 1049001707 1033 001707 2013 001707 2033001707 1028 001101 1074 001707 2034001706 1027 001707 2026 001704 2179001706 1032 001303 3001 001707 1000001707 1018 001304 4005 001707 1013001707 1016 001101 1035 001706 1001001303 1000 001707 1005 001101 1108001303 2012 001707 1031 001303 5001001101 1083 001706 1016 001303 3012001303 3009 001706 1025 001303 4008001303 1003 001706 1033 001303 4003001303 2011 001704 2180 001303 4000001303 2002 001301 7013 001101 1042001303 2007 001301 7003 001304 2001001303 1002 001101 1038 001704 1079001707 2031 001101 1101 001704 1115001101 1055 001101 1088 001707 1003001707 1006 001304 2002 001707 1030001706 1008 001706 1028 001706 1007001707 1017 001707 2014 001706 1009001101 1086 001304 4000 001706 1022001101 1082 001707 2011 001706 1040001101 1113 001707 2028 001707 2021001101 1057 001101 1061 001101 1026001704 2000 001707 2032 001101 1117001101 3001 001704 2184 001304 4002001303 1006 001101 3003 001704 2186001303 1007 001101 2006 001303 5008001304 2004 001101 2005 001303 4004001304 4006 001101 2003 001303 4010001707 1038 001101 1100 001704 2181001706 1013 001101 1106 001704 2185001706 1042 001303 2004 001706 1003001303 5009 001707 1027 001707 2018001303 2009 001704 2001 001101 1059001706 1002 001707 2025 001101 1105001707 1009 001303 1009 001101 1058001706 1029 001304 4001 001303 4006001707 1039 001301 7005 001304 1006001706 1026 001704 2183 001304 1008001706 2002 001101 3000 001707 1040
    • 001303 5004 001101 3006001304 4004 001303 2010001707 2012 001704 1068001707 1037 001706 1004001707 1035 001707 1014001704 1094 001101 1093001706 1006 001101 1071001706 1010 001101 1070001707 1022 001101 1056001707 1024 001303 3013001706 1031 001101 1063001707 1036 001707 1007001706 1012 001707 1029001706 1015 001707 1025001101 1024 001707 2017001101 1054 001706 1017001707 1020 001706 1021001101 1077 001706 1036001101 1067 001704 1096001101 1110 001707 2022001303 3007 001706 1035001304 2003 001101 1047001707 1019 001707 1004001301 7004 001707 1023001101 1076 001101 1066001101 1050 001101 1079001101 1051 001101 1080001303 3011 001101 1072001303 3000 001707 2036001101 3005 001707 2020001303 3002 001707 2010001101 1094 001303 3004001101 1107 001303 4001001303 4011 001303 2000001303 5000 001303 5007001303 5003 001101 1085001303 4007 001101 1073001706 1024 001101 1044001706 1000001707 2027001706 1039001707 2009001706 1005001101 1102
    • City of San AngeloMemo Date: March 6, 2013 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Ricky Dickson, Interim Water Utilities Director Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Ricky Dickson, Water Utilities Director, 657-4209 Caption: Update on the design and construction activities for the Hickory Water Supply Project Summary: Hutch Musallam with Carollo Engineers will give an update on the status of the Hickory Water Supply projects currently under design and the projects currently in construction. History: Construction on the first Hickory project began in the Fall of 2011 with the Well Field Pipelines project. This project has since been completed and two other projects are currently under construction. The projects under construction are the 30” Transmission Main and the Booster Pump Station and Well Field Improvements. Projects currently in the design phase are the Groundwater Treatment Facility and drilling of new wells for the expansion of the well field. Planned projects will include equipping the new wells, extension of well field collector mains, extension of power lines to the new wells, construction of well access roads and installation of an additional pump in the booster pump station. Financial Impact: N/A Other Information/Recommendation: N/A Attachments: Presentation Presentation: Project update by Hutch Musallam, Carollo Engineers. Publication: None. Reviewed by Service Area Director: Ricky Dickson, Water Utilities Director, March 6, 2013.
    • Progress Report San Angelo City Council March 19, 2013Agenda1. Progress & Schedule Update: a. Transmission M i T i i Main b. Booster Pump Station & Well Field c. Treatment d. New Groundwater Wells2.2 Questions Disc ssion Q estions & Discussion 2 1
    • Transmission Main NTP January 23, 2012 Substantial Completion: July 16, 2013 Final Completion: September 14, 2013 Current status: Dig-Lay-Bury is approximately 80% complete 3Progress As of March 4, 2013 4 2
    • Progress Summary 3rd dig-lay-bury crew added through March 14, 2013 to expedite production i BCV areas b f t dit d ti in before nesting season. Work progressing in both directions Valves and appurtenance work ongoing with dig- lay-bury l b Pressure testing starting soon 5Laying Pipe in Rock 6 3
    • Gate Valve Installation 7Booster Pump Station & Well Field NTP: June 18, 2012 Substantial Completion: June 18, 2013 Final Completion: July 17, 2013 Current Status: Approximately 50% complete 8 4
    • Progress Summary Booster pump cans set, backfill underway Foundations for all well buildings underway most underway, complete High point and well 6 tank foundations underway. Well cleaning underway Potential delay to current schedule mainly due to longer than expected time needed to clean and retrofit existing wells 9 Hickory Wells 1-9 Background  Wells drilled in the 70s  Potential obstructions or items identified by the initial video survey at some wells  TCEQ required cleaning of the well casing at each well along with the removal of debris or obstructions noted i the i i i l video survey b i d in h initial id followed by a new video survey to confirm conditions of wells 10 5
    • Conditions of Well Obstruction in Well 4 has been identified as a packing plug Contractor trying drill and air purge it plug. out of the well. Obstruction removal and repairs to 3 wells 5 holes in well 7 casing: 1 at 64 feet, 3 at 1,128 feet, and 1 at 2,062 feet. A sleeve can be swaged in at 64 feet and possibly at 1128 feet, but not at 2062 due to the pressure at that depth. H l at 2062 i h h d h Hole is completely sealed with grout. Well 1 liner casing slipped. Attempt will be made to remove the slipped casing. 11Setting block for booster pump stationelectrical building 12 6
    • Booster Pump Cans 13Looking East PS & Electrical Building 14 7
    • Underground electrical at Well 1 15Groundwater Treatment Plant Groundwater Treatment Facility Disinfection Facility Associated civil work and piping Project Status: • RRSS Selection and Design NTP: February 6, 2013 g y , • Overall final design: Anticipated completion completion April 30, 2013 16 8
    • Site LayoutDisinfection Facility Groundwater Treatment Facility 17Disinfection Facility 18 9
    • Groundwater Treatment Facility 19Groundwater Treatment Facility Building Dimensions: 208’ – 0” x 133’ – 4” 20 10
    • Groundwater Treatment Facility 21 Disinfection FacilityBuilding Dimensions: 105’ – 4” x 64’ – 44” 22 11
    • Disinfection Facility 23Post Design Key Milestones Anticipated Dates or ScheduleTWDB/TCEQ Review May 1, 2013 through June 30 1 30, 2013Advertise Project May 16, 2013Bid Project July 9, 2013Recommendation of Award & July 9 through July 16, 2013Council ApprovalTWDB R l Release of F d and NTP f Funds d August 1 2013 A t 1,Substantial Construction July 31, 2014Completion for GWTFFinal Construction Completion of October 30, 2014Project 24 12
    • New Wells Regulatory hurdle cleared and clearing, grubbing and grinding of cleared material of new wells and d i di f l d t i l f ll d ROW complete. Phase 1: Engineering for “Drilling New Wells” underway. Expected design completion and submittal to TCEQ April 30 2013 30, Phase 2: Engineering for “Site Civil, Piping and Equipping New Wells” will start in May 2013 25 Questions? San Angelo City Council March 23, 2013 13
    • City of San Angelo Finance DepartmentMemo Date: March 6, 2013 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Steve Mahaffey, Budget Analyst, Sr. Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Steve Mahaffey, Budget Analyst, Sr. 481-2757 Caption: st nd Regular (1 reading) Consent (2 reading) First public hearing and introduction of an Ordinance amending the 2012-2013 Budget for new projects, incomplete projects, capital projects and grants. Summary: This proposed amendment contains the following items (additional information attached): City of San Angelo Operating Budget • RLSS Grant for Health Department • Texas Historical Commission Planning/Feasibility Study Grant • Downtown Streetscape Project • Chase State Office Building Maintenance History: See attached Budget Amendment Request memorandum. Financial Impact: $490,664 (see attached detail on Exhibit A of the Ordinance) Related Vision Item (if applicable): N/A Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Ordinance including Exhibit A; Department request memos Presentation: N/A Publication: N/A Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane, ACM/CFO
    • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2012, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2013, FOR NEW PROJECTS, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS.WHEREAS the City of San Angelo has determined that new projects not included in thecurrent budget should begin, andWHEREAS the City of San Angelo has determined that certain budgeted amounts shouldbe amended due to project changes and unforeseen circumstances, andWHEREAS the resources necessary for these changes are available;NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:The City’s budget for fiscal year 2012-2013 be amended by the amounts contained inExhibit A.INTRODUCED on the 19th day of March, 2013, and APPROVED and ADOPTED onthis the 2nd day of April, 2013. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS __________________________________ Alvin New, MayorATTEST:__________________________________Alicia Ramirez, City ClerkApproved as to Content and Form:__________________________________Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO
    • City of San AngeloProposed Budget AmendmentExhibit A Total Total Net Fund Revenue Expenditure Benefit/Number Fund Name Amendment Amendment (Cost)COSA Operating Budget 103 Intergovernmental Fund 47,380 47,380 0 General Debt Service 105 0 220,000 (220,000) Fund 106 South TIRZ Fund 0 93,284 (93,284) 201 State Office Building Fund 0 130,000 (130,000) Totals 47,380 490,664 (443,284)
    • City of San AngeloProposed Budget AmendmentAdditional Information Net Benefit/Project/Need Source of Funding Revenue Expense (Cost) Department of StateRLSS Grant Funds Health Services RLSS 22,402 22,402 0 GrantTexas Historical Commission Texas Historical 24,978 24,978 0Planning/Feasibility Study Grant Commission Grant South TIRZ Fund-FundDowntown Streetscape Project 0 93,284 (93,284) Balance State Office BuildingChase State Office Building Maintenance 0 130,000 (130,000) Fund - Fund Balance General Debt Service 0 220,000 (220,000) Fund – Fund Balance Totals 47,380 490,664 (443,284)
    • City of San Angelo Finance DepartmentMemo Date: February 21, 2013 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Laura Brooks, Budget Analyst Sr. Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Morgan Trainer, Finance, 325-653-6291 Caption: Regular Item Public hearing and consideration of approving and adopting a resolution authorizing the adoption of the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan for the City of San Angelo Summary: Attached is the final proposed 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The City Council must conduct a public hearing on the proposed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The proposed CIP must be published to the internet and a public notice providing the date and time of the public hearing published within two weeks of the CIP being posted and the CIP Transmittal Letter reinforces the objectives of the CIP as a planning tool and not a funding mechanism. The attached resolution is the final step to adopt the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Submitted projects have been reviewed by the CIP committee. History: Preparation of the 2013-2018 CIP began November 20, 2012 with discussion with City Council. Budget staff provided instruction for division managers to prepare CIP projects , December 10, 2012. On December 20 2012, project managers submitted proposed projects. The committee reviewed projects January 31, 2013. Public meetings were held February 7 and 12, 2013. City Council Discussed the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) at the strategic planning session February 26, 2013 and at the regular meeting March 5, 2013. Financial Impact: Funding will be discussed during the FY 2013-2014 budget preparation process. Related Vision Item (if applicable): Infrastructure and Financial Visions Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommendations approving the capital improvement plan and adoption of the resolution. Attachments: Proposed 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan, Resolution Presentation: Powerpoint Publication: Notice of this Public Hearing was posted on the website. Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO  Page 1
    • City of San Angelo 2013-2018CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
    • 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan City Council Alvin New, Mayor Paul Alexander, SMD #1 Dwain Morrison, SMD #2 Johnny Silvas, SMD #3 Kendall Hirschfeld, SMD #5 Charlotte Farmer, SMD #6 City Management Daniel Valenzuela, City Manager Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager for Community Services Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Capital projects are prepared by the staff member identified within each project sheet Capital Improvement Plan preparation: Morgan Trainer, Budget Manager Laura Brooks, Senior Budget Analyst Steven Mahaffey, Senior Budget Analyst Introduction of the Capital Improvement Plan February 21, 2013 Public Hearing March 5, 2013 Plan Adoption March 19, 2013 
    • This page was intentionally left blank
    •    March 6, 2013    Dear Citizens,  The 2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is the seventh annual CIP completed by the City of San Angelo.  The citizens approved a change to the city’s charter in November 2007 to require the preparation of a CIP every year.   Overview The plan identifies the capital needs of the city for a five‐year planning period.  The CIP is updated annually to reflect the changing needs of the community and address any new issues that impact our community.The  CIP  does  not  appropriate  funds,  but  supports  the  budget  process  and  the  appropriations  made  through  the adoption of the budget.  An effective CIP provides for considerable advance notification, planning, evaluation, scope definition, design, public discussion, cost estimation, and financial planning.   The objectives utilized to develop the CIP are:  To preserve and improve the infrastructure of San Angelo;  To identify and examine current and future infrastructure needs and minimize the financial impact on residents;  To  maximize  the  useful  life  of  capital  investments  by  scheduling  major  renovations  and  modifications  at  the  appropriate time in the life‐cycle of the facility;  To improve financial planning by comparing needs with resources, and estimating future funding issues; There are many benefits of having a CIP.  First and foremost, it provides an overall perspective for the development pattern of the city, thus enabling the citizens as well as the City Council and staff to take a long‐range view of their future activities and responsibilities.  The CIP also highlights the deficiencies of the city and stimulates action to correct them.    The  plan  promotes  coordination  of  projects  across  City  departments  and  across  overlapping  governmental jurisdictions.    It  also  allows  City  staff  to  more  effectively  budget  operating  expenditures  each  year  necessary  to maintain new projects and stabilize personnel demands. Compliance City staff together with public input made every effort to ensure the CIP is compliant with the items mandated in the city charter.  Section 59A (attached) from the city charter defines San Angelo’s capital program.  This language was truly a cohesive effort drafted by a committee of City staff and citizens.  For example the charter states the plan should be an annual effort, outlines what content should be included, requires public hearings, and dictates how the plan should be adopted.   The City Charter sets forth the mandatory elements of a comprehensive capital plan.  Those elements include a    A summary,    long‐term goals of the community,    capital improvement expenditures,    cost estimates,    funding source,    estimated annual operating costs,    how the plan sustains San Angelo,    and performance measures.  1
    • 2
    • 3
    • This page was intentionally left blank 4
    • STRATEGIC PLANNING MEETING PRIORITIES (FEBRUARY 26, 2013)1. Street maintenance / restoration / illustration a. Evaluation i. Assess condition ii. Plan / prioritize iii. Fund iv. Build v. Maintain vi. Continue to repeat – i. through v. b. Street Condition Study i. Obtain funding sources to assist with study, i.e. grants ii. Group all streets and categorize/evaluate by useful life and level of work to be completed: New streets, sealcoat, mill & overlay, and total reconstruct. iii. Based on comprehensive 7 year rotation plan, determine at which level to assign a street, including associated costs iv. Base prioritization on assessed data and future use v. Implement Comprehensive 7 Year Street Plan 1. Plan will decrease overall CIP cost by 1/5 vi. Work closely with Street & Bridge Department to begin maintenance program2. Stormwater infrastructure3. Reduce property tax rate a. Transition subsidized projects to self funded b. Utilize additional funds to fund one time projects, i.e. streets, police center, underground stormwater infrastructure c. Steady government growth related to population d. Implemented 10 year goal to decrease property tax from 86.86% to 76%. e. Establish a goal to decrease property tax to 70% and out of the TML Top Ten highest property tax rate for cities over 50K population 5
    • 4. Revenue Retain/wage/maintain staffing a. Impact of Cline Shale i. Impact study conducted on Eagle Ford Shale (expands over 20 counties) ii. Projecting increasing sales tax revenues and housing iii. Potential to create 17k jobs within 7 years iv. San Angelo experiencing increased inflationary factors 1. Must insure organization is running efficiently and directing funds to the appropriate projects5. Manage organization growth a. Steady government growth related to population i. Organization growth where necessary, i.e. public safety6. Offset value increase with rate reduction a. Per hotel/motel room7. Tourism: Onetime projects a. Wayfinding i. Establish and implement a uniform plan ii. Utilize HOT to fund b. Ft. Concho i. Established a virtual presentation and accomplish more for tourism, i.e. talking mule or buffalo soldier. c. Ft. Concho maintenance i. Utilize HOT to fund infrastructure d. Coliseum Marquee signage i. Utilize HOT to fund infrastructure e. Other occupancy tax projects f. Reserve / rate stabilization i. Establish reserve funds for major projects, including Hotel Occupancy Tax ii. Establish rate stabilization for known future projects to provide a smooth transition, i.e. landfill g. Grantee accountability i. Establish and implement performance measurements, metrics, and benchmarks ii. Consider long term imaging, incremental increases, image building, continually raising the bar h. Create/pursue an image/vision i. Exceptionalism at all levels 6
    • j. Chamber partnership i. Establish and implement performance measurements, metrics, and benchmarks ii. Tangible results iii. Implement a set fee vs. percentage allocation, thereby providing static funds that can be adjusted k. Recruit more events, i.e. drag boat races l. Revenue per room i. Disclose anomalies ii. Measure/track room rate increase impacts8. Police Department Facility a. Restart momentum i. Establish a budget for facility ii. Consider issuing bond b. Debt capacity update9. Economic Development a. What to incent? i. Establish criteria on types of business to incentivize 1. Consider preference points to qualify for incentive ii. Put study in action 1. Continue with discipline on the big study; key points into play iii. Assist Chamber to complete marketing plan 1. Tailor focus b. Provide support for local/small business i. Business Resource Center ii. Human Resources support iii. Technical support c. Streamline Housing / building process i. Expedite regulatory process 1. Make the process quicker to accommodating the customer’s needs, but still manage staff, i.e. working overtime ii. Permit time objectives iii. Targeted staffing increases iv. Time studies/objectives v. Productivity benchmarks d. Brownwood/3M Company Inquiry e. Short / long term goals i. Provide assistance to local business to speed up the process ii. Continue with strategic plan process iii. Continue with Chamber’s marketing plan; accountability 7
    • f. Economic diversification i. Build existing businesses to handle low or declining economic periodsg. Sales tax equity – Online vs. Bricks & Mortar i. Small business online sales ii. Provide service via Business Resource Center iii. Establish a national presence for local businessesh. Transportation i. Air service ii. Regional road issues iii. Ports to Plainsi. Re-cap report of the various projects and studies i. Goal progress/ executive summary 1. Dashboard view 2. Requires self discipline to stay on top of these plans a. Lake Nasworthy Study / Gateway Planning 8
    • City of San Angelo 2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan Summary of ProjectsProject Type Key: IN= Infrastructure; AP= Airport; COF= City Operation Facilities; CFP‐ Community Facilities & Parks; EN= Environmental Projects; EQ= Equipment; TG= Technology Dedicated/C Project  ommitted  Total Project  Type Division Project Title Project Manager Funding Proposed Funding Source 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Costs IN Street & Bridge Mill & Overlay‐ Main Street Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 185,000 185,000 IN Street & Bridge Mill & Overlay ‐ 14th Street Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 403,000 403,000 IN Street & Bridge Mill & Overlay ‐ 19th Street Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 378,000 378,000 Reconstruction of Bell St from Concho River to Old Ballinger  IN Street & Bridge Clinton Bailey N 4,800,000 4,800,000 Hwy Undetermined IN Street & Bridge Reconstruction of Glenna Dr. from Houston Harte to Junius St Clinton Bailey N 1,300,000 1,300,000 Undetermined IN Street & Bridge Reconstruction of Main St. from 19th St. to 26th St. Clinton Bailey N Undetermined 1,800,000 1,800,000 IN Street & Bridge Reconstruction of MLK Blvd. from 25th St. to 29th St. Clinton Bailey N Undetermined 2,500,000 2,500,000 Reconstruction of Southwest Blvd from Sunset South to  IN Street & Bridge Clinton Bailey N 6,500,000 6,500,000 Railroad Tracks Undetermined Reconstruction of 29th St. from Bryant Blvd. to 2018 N.  IN Street & Bridge Clinton Bailey N 2,500,000 2,500,000 Chadbourne Undetermined Engineering  IN Sealcoat Program Clinton Bailey Y 1,800,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 4,863,000 Services General Fund IN Stormwater Storm Water Quality Improvements Clinton Bailey N Future Stormwater Utility Fee 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 29,300,000 IN Stormwater Sunset Lake Improvements Clinton Bailey Y Stormwater Utility Fee 700,000 700,000 IN Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Ave P Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 1,300,000 2,000,000 IN Water Utilities Avenue D Water Line Replacement Robert Bluthardt Y Water Fund 75,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 IN  Water Utilities Automated Meter Reading System Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 1,250,000 1,250,000 7,550,000 IN Water Utilities Clay Pipe Replacements Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 73,997,896 IN Water Utilities Collector Main Replacements Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 23,700,000 IN Water Utilities Hickory Water Supply Development Phase I Ricky Dickson Y Water Fund/Type B Sales Tax 37,000,000 30,000,000 120,000,000 IN Water Utilities High Service Pump Station Rehab Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 3,950,000 IN Water Utilities Lift Station Improvements Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,720,000 IN Water Utilities Nasworthy Dam Emergency Spillway Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 2,000,000 2,000,000 IN Water Utilities Nasworthy Dam Stop Log Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 750,000 750,000 IN Water Utilities Lake Nasworthy Gate Operators Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 2,216,000 3,250,000 IN Water Utilities Transmission Line Valves Replacement Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,650,000 IN Water Utilities Transmission Mains Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 5,100,000 5,300,000 6,000,000 6,150,000 28,190,000 Water CIP Fund, Water Fund,State  IN Water Utilities Twin Buttes Eco‐System Restoration Ricky Dickson Y 1,000,000 Soil & Water Board IN Water Utilities Water Billing & Customer Service Office Remodeling Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 500,000 1,000,000 IN Water Utilities Water Main Replacements Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 52,761,509 IN Water Utilities Water Reclamation Plant Improvements Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,800,000 IN Water Utilities Water Treatment Plant Equipment Improvements Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 200,000 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,200,000 IN Water Utilities Wastewater Service to Existing Developed Areas Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 17,200,000 IN Traffic Operations Replace School Zone and Crosswalk Equipment Shane Kelton Y 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 158,000 Tom Green County Fee IN Traffic Operations Sign Reflectivity Upgrade Shane Kelton Y General Fund 56,550 57,681 58,834 60,011 61,211 577,364 Level 1 Infrastructure Projects Total 60,481,550 52,050,681 15,351,834 13,028,011 8,861,211 402,808,769 AP Airport Apron Joint Seal Luis Elguezabal Y FAA Grant,PFC Fund 54,900 555,555 610,455 AP Airport Runway 3‐21 Lights & Beacon Luis Elguezabal Y FAA Grant,PFC Fund 631,889 AP Airport Airport Terminal Renovation Luis Elguezabal Y 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 600,862 6,280,241 FAA Grant,PFC Fund,Type B Sales Tax Emergency  COF EOC HVAC Replacement Teresa Covey N 500,000 500,000 Management Undetermined COF Fire Fire Station 4 Reconstruction Brian Dunn N General Fund C.O. 2,580,000 2,580,000 COF Fire Fire Training Facility Brian Dunn N General Fund C.O., Federal Grant 1,400,000 2,600,000 9
    • City of San Angelo 2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan Summary of ProjectsProject Type Key: IN= Infrastructure; AP= Airport; COF= City Operation Facilities; CFP‐ Community Facilities & Parks; EN= Environmental Projects; EQ= Equipment; TG= Technology Dedicated/C Project  ommitted  Total Project  Type Division Project Title Project Manager Funding Proposed Funding Source 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Costs COF Fort Concho Chase State Office Building Improvements Robert Bluthardt Y State Office Building Fund 200,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 300,000 COF Police Police Boat Storage Dock Tim Vasquez N Undetermined 75,000 75,000 COF Police Mobile Command Center Storage Facility Tim Vasquez N Undetermined 60,000 60,000 COF Police Police Department Administration Building Tim Vasquez N General Fund, General Fund C.O. 25,775,000 25,910,067 CFP Civic Events Auditorium Renovation Angelica Pena Y Type B Sales Tax 2,314,197 3,750,000 CFP Civic Events Fairgrounds Livestock Barn Angelica Pena Y Type B Sales Tax 1,000,000 CFP Civic Events Coliseum Improvements Angelica Pena N Undetermined 60,000 60,000 CFP Civic Events Coliseum Roof Angelica Pena N Undetermined 545,000 545,000 CFP Civic Events Convention Center Improvements Angelica Pena N Undetermined 83,069 119,900 CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho Barracks 6 New Floor Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 15,000 15,000 CFP Fort Concho Heating & Cooling Unit Replacements Fort Concho Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 125,000 20,000 15,000 160,000 CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho Post Bandstand Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 25,000 25,000 CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho Visitor Center Improvements Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 100,000 750,000 250,000 400,000 1,500,000 CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho OQ1 Rear Room & Roof Repairs Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 75,000 75,000 Development  CFP Wayfinding Phases I‐III A.J. Fawver N 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 Services Undetermined CFP MPO Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvement Program Doray Hill, Jr. Y 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Transportation Grant, General Fund CFP Real Estate/Legal Santa Fe Train Depot Improvements Cindy Preas N Undetermined 21,238 20,000 15,000 22,500 22,500 126,238 CFP Real Estate/Legal Spur Parking Garage Cindy Preas N Undetermined 1,825,000 1,825,000 CFP Parks 29th Street Complex Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 1,650,000 1,650,000 CFP Recreation Community Aquatics Facility MaryAnn Vasquez Y Type B Sales Tax, Donation 3,262,422 CFP Recreation Recreation Center Air Conditioning MaryAnn Vasquez N Undetermined 500,000 500,000 CFP Recreation Youth Soccer Complex at Glenna St MaryAnn Vasquez Y Type B Sales Tax 270,000 CFP Parks Bradford Neighborhood & School Park Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 175,000 CFP Parks Brentwood Park Renovation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 275,000 275,000 CFP Parks Brown Park Renovation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 175,000 175,000 CFP Parks Central Control Irrigation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 110,500 CFP Parks Civic League Park Improvements Carl White Y Grant, Donation 115,000 115,000 CFP Parks Fairmount Cemetery Improvements Phase I Carl White N Donation, Undetermined 600,000 600,000 CFP Parks Hilltop Trail Carl White Y 200,000 200,000 Grant, Possible Trust Fund Funding CFP Parks Middle Concho Boat Ramp Carl White Y 471,000 471,000 Grant, Possible Trust Fund Funding CFP Parks Red Arroyo Trail Clinton Bailey Y Grant, Type B Sales Tax, Stormwater  400,000 400,000 4,000,000 Fund, Private Donation CDBG Funds, Type B Sales Tax,  CFP Parks Rio Vista Neighborhood Park Renovation Carl White Y 813,900 Donation CFP Parks Rio Concho Community Park Carl White N Type B Sales Tax, Undetermined 85,000 650,000 CFP Parks Santa Rita Neighborhood Park Renovation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax, Donation 150,000 150,000 CFP Parks South Concho Boat Ramp Carl White Y 438,600 438,600 Grant, Possible Trust Fund Funding CFP Parks Sunken Garden Park Carl White N Undetermined 275,000 275,000 Concho River Dredging, Bank Stabilization, & Trail  Type B Sales Tax, Grants, Stormwater  EN Parks Carl White Y 15,436,647 Improvements Fund EQ Public Information Public Information Equipment Replacement Anthony Wilson N 19,874 4,668 5,378 47,856 Grant, Undetermined TG Police Public Communications Technology Upgrade Victor Vasquez N Undetermined, General Fund 120,000 517,000 TG Fire Mobile Data Terminals Brian Dunn N Undetermined 182,600 182,600 10
    • City of San Angelo 2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan Summary of ProjectsProject Type Key: IN= Infrastructure; AP= Airport; COF= City Operation Facilities; CFP‐ Community Facilities & Parks; EN= Environmental Projects; EQ= Equipment; TG= Technology Dedicated/C Project  ommitted  Total Project  Type Division Project Title Project Manager Funding Proposed Funding Source 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Costs Information  TG Server Upgrades John Eades N 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 250,000 Technology General Fund, Undetermined Information  TG IBM Power 7 Server John Eades N General Fund, Undetermined 65,000 65,000 Technology Level 2 Other Projects Total 34,592,781 11,892,465 2,770,278 2,873,917 1,342,500 84,679,315 2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan Level 1 & 2 Projects Total 95,074,331 63,943,146 18,122,112 15,901,928 10,203,711 487,488,084 11
    • This page was intentionally left blank 12
    • 2013-2018 CapitalImprovement Plan Infrastructure Projects LEVEL 1Projects related to Streets, Water, Waste Water, & Storm Water 13
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Mill and Overlay of Main St. from Houston Harte to 19th St.Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 185,000 - - - - - $ 185,000Description:Mill and overlay is a street maintenance process whereby the top 1"-3" of existing asphalt pavement is removed with a milling machine and a 1"-3"layer of asphalt is placed with a asphalt paver directly over the milled area. Mill and overlay considered a "high-level" preventative maintenanceactivity or "low-level" reconstruction effort that falls between sealcoat maintenance and full depth reconstruction with respect to overall cost andproject complexity. The success of the mill and overlay process is largely dependent upon the condition of the roadway foundation (base courseand subgrade). With the roadway foundation in good condition, a mill and overlay can potentially add 10-15 years to the useful life of the roadway.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 185,000 - Other - - Total $ 185,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: December 2012 100% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: April 2013 0% Funding Sources: Amount General Fund $ 185,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Reduce overall roadway maintenance $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Improve ride quality and reduce future maintenance costs.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $181,551 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Main Street San Angelo Texas 14
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Mill and Overlay of 14th St. from Chadbourne St. to Main St.Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 403,000 - - - - - $ 403,000Description:Mill and overlay is a street maintenance process whereby the top 1"-3" of existing asphalt pavement is removed with a milling machine and a 1"-3"layer of asphalt is placed with a asphalt paver directly over the milled area. Mill and overlay considered a "high-level" preventative maintenanceactivity or "low-level" reconstruction effort that falls between sealcoat maintenance and full depth reconstruction with respect to overall cost andproject complexity. The success of the mill and overlay process is largely dependent upon the condition of the roadway foundation (base courseand subgrade). With the roadway foundation in good condition, a mill and overlay can potentially add 10-15 years to the useful life of the roadway.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 403,000 - Other - - Total $ 403,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: December 2012 100% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: April 2013 0% Funding Sources: Amount General Fund $ 403,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Reduce overall roadway maintenance $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Improve ride quality and reduce future maintenance costs.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $395,486 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 14th Street San Angelo Texas 15
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Mill and Overlay of 19th St. from Bryant Blvd. West to Concho RiverResponsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 378,000 - - - - - $ 378,000Description:Mill and overlay is a street maintenance process whereby the top 1"-3" of existing asphalt pavement is removed with a milling machine and a 1"-3"layer of asphalt is placed with a asphalt paver directly over the milled area. Mill and overlay considered a "high-level" preventative maintenanceactivity or "low-level" reconstruction effort that falls between sealcoat maintenance and full depth reconstruction with respect to overall cost andproject complexity. The success of the mill and overlay process is largely dependent upon the condition of the roadway foundation (base courseand subgrade). With the roadway foundation in good condition, a mill and overlay can potentially add 10-15 years to the useful life of the roadway.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 378,000 - Other - - Total $ 378,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: December 2012 100% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: April 2013 0% Funding Sources: Amount General Fund $ 378,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Reduce overall roadway maintenance $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Improve ride quality and reduce future maintenance costs.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $370,952 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 19th Street San Angelo Texas 16
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Reconstruction of Bell St from Concho River to Old Ballinger HwyResponsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 4,800,000 - - - - - $ 4,800,000Description:Full depth reconstruction of Bell St. from Concho River to Old Ballinger Hwy, installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 4,800,000 - Other - - Total $ 4,800,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 4,800,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $4,710,500 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Bell Street San Angelo Texas 17
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Reconstruction of Glenna Dr. from Houston Harte to Junius St.Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - - - - 1,300,000 - - $ 1,300,000Description:Full depth reconstruction of Glenna Dr. from Houston Harte to Junius St., installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 1,300,000 - Other - - Total $ 1,300,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 1,300,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,205,658 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Glenna Drive San Angelo Texas 18
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Reconstruction of Main St. from 19th St. to 26th St.Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - - - - - 1,800,000 - $ 1,800,000Description:Full depth reconstruction of Main St. from 19th St. to 26th St., installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 1,800,000 - Other - - Total $ 1,800,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 1,800,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,638,246 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Main Street San Angelo Texas 19
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Reconstruction of MLK Blvd. from 25th St. to 29th St.Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - - - 2,500,000 - - - $ 2,500,000Description:Full depth reconstruction of MLK Blvd. from 25th St. to 29th St., installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction - - Other - - Total $ - $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 2,500,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $2,362,748 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Martin Luther King Blvd. San Angelo Texas 20
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Reconstruction of Southwest Blvd from Sunset South to Railroad TracksResponsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - - 6,500,000 - - - - $ 6,500,000Description:Full depth reconstruction of Southwest Blvd from Sunset south to railroad tracks, installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 6,500,000 - Other - - Total $ 6,500,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 6,500,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $6,259,865 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Southwest Blvd San Angelo Texas 21
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Reconstruction of 29th St. from Bryant Blvd. to N. ChadbourneResponsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - - - - - 2,500,000 - $ 2,500,000Description:Full depth reconstruction of29th St. from Bryant Blvd. to 2018 N. Chadbourne, installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 2,500,000 - Other - - Total $ 2,500,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 2,500,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18N/A $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $2,275,342 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 29th Street San Angelo Texas 22
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Sealcoat ProgramResponsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total 663,000 1,800,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 $ 4,863,000Description:Sealcoat is the application of asphalt and aggregate over existing asphalt roadway surfaces for the purpose of sealing surface cracks for theprotection of the roadway foundation. The foundation of a roadway accounts for approximately 67% of the total cost of a roadway. Sealcoat is partof the Citys preventative maintenance program and must be done to realize the full useful life of existing asphalt roadways throughout the City.Sealcoat should be applied to asphalt roadways at intervals not to exceed 8 years.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 1,800,000 - Other - - Total $ 1,800,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: February 2013 50% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: September 2013 0% Funding Sources: Amount General Fund $ 1,800,000 Undetermined $ -Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Reduce routine maintenance costs associated with reparing $ - - - - -cracks and potholes created by severe crackingOperating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increase routine maintenance costs associated with $ - - - - -repairing cracks and potholes created by severe crackingPerformance Measures:Improve ride quality, reduce future maintenance costs and extend the need for expensive long term reconstruction costs.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $4,676,871 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) City Wide San Angelo Texas 23
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Storm Water Quality Improvement ProjectsResponsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - 700,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 23,300,000 $ 29,300,000Description:Construction of projects to address specific stormwater quality issues within major drainage-ways throughout San Angelo that have been identifiedthrough the analysis and modeling of data collected by stormwater monitoring stations.Supporting planning document(s):City of San Angelo Stormwater Management Plan and associated City Council approved stormwater budget. Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 30,000,000 - Other - - Total $ 30,000,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0% then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2013 0% Funding Sources: Amount Future stormwater utility fee $ 30,000,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Operations and Maintenance $ 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Performance Measures:A reduction in the measured levels of pollution within drainage ways and rivers throughout and downstream of San Angelo.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $26,524,213 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) City wide San Angelo Texas 24
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Storm Water Quality Improvement Projects - Sunset Lake ImprovementsResponsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 700,000 - $ 700,000Description:Sunset Lake acts as a stormwater retention/detention pond. Sampling and analysis through the Citys stormwater quality monitoring program hasresulted in the determination that stormwater discharges into Sunset Lake contain a significant amount of suspended solids (sediment) anddissolved solids (primarily nitrogen and phosphorus from fertilizer). Sunset Lake is no longer efficient in removing these contaminants becausesediment deposits have caused it to become "silted in". Shallow water depth and nutrient rich water and sediment result in the lake becomingcovered with moss and other aquatic vegetation during the summer months. This vegetation uses all of the available oxygen in the water which hasresulted in several fish kills over the last several years and a continuous odor problem. The average depth of Sunset Lake is approximately four (4)feet. This project would increase the depth of the lake to its original depth of approximately 8 feet and add components making more efficient atremoving contaminants from stormwater.Supporting planning document(s):City of San Angelo Stormwater Management Plan and associated City Council approved stormwater budget. Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 700,000 - Other - - Total $ 700,000 $ -Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert Project Schedule: % Complete in the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from Design: 2013 10%File, then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Implementation: 2014 0% Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Stormwater Utility Fee $ 700,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Cost associated with routine maintenance which includes $ - - - - 10,000 10 000draining Sunset Lake and removing sediment and debrisevery five years.Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Cost associated with removing vegetation debris from Sunset $ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000Lake.Performance Measures:A reduction in the measured levels of pollution within drainage ways and rivers throughout and downstream of San Angelo.Notes:Design is being done in-house, therefore there is no separate cost estimate.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $683,241 Not Completing Project $28,635Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Between Loop 306 and Sunset Dr./Huntington San Angelo Texas 2) and Brook Hollow Ln. 25
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Remediation of Drainage Issue: West Ave. P at Bryant Blvd.Responsible Division: Stormwater Project Manager: Clinton BaileyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - 700,000 1,300,000 - - - - $ 2,000,000Description:During storm events, an excessive amount of street flow occurs across Bryant Blvd. flowing down Ave. P. The existing culverts under Bryantdischarge directly onto Ave. P, and after crossing Bryant, the flow continues to the east along Ave P, cuts through an alley between Ave P and Q, thecontinues south in a channel between Irving St. and Chadbourne St. until in reaches the Red Arroyo. Remediation of this drainage problem consists ofthe construction of drainage improvements including street re-grading, culvert modification and subsurface drainage system installation.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land 50,000 - Design - - Construction 1,950,000 - Other - - Total $ 2,000,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 100% then click Browse… Implementation: 0% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount General Fund $ 2,000,000 Undetermined $ -Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Performance Measure:Reduce flood hazards to protect property and the health, safety and welfare of the public.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,975,761 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) W. Ave. P at Bryant San Angelo Texas 26
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Avenue D Water Line ReplacementResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Robert BluthardtFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 75,000 25,000 25,000 - - - $ 125,000Description:The water lines behind Officers Row are ancient, possibly dating to the late 1800s! The water has poor pressure and a foul smell and objectionableappearance. It poses long-term challenges to appliances and plumbing fixtures. Staff recommends a full replacement of the lines. These linesserve several critical buildings that serve our VIP guests (OQ 1), our visitors (OQ 3 and OQ 4), our renters and events (OQ 8) and staff (OQ 2, OQ7 & O Q 9).Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 125,000 - Other - - Total $ 125,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 1 month 0% then click Browse… Implementation 1 month 0% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Water Fund $ 125,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Longer lasting hot water heaters and other appliances. $ 1,000 1,500 2,500 - - materials,Less expenses for chemicals and cleaning materials notedby these figures.Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Potential expenses for interior appliances and fixtures; $ 1,500 2,000 2,500 - -loss of income from rental buildings due to poor publicperception of sitePerformance Measures:Increased Rentals; Fewer Complaints; Fewer Appliance/Fixture ReplacementsNotes:The fort board and staff have consistently ranked the water service and quality on this side of the fort as a major concern. The improved waterservice is vital to the forts success in ongoing programing and public service. It will also contribute to the better functioning of these structures.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $126,094 Not Completing Project $5761Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 100 & 200 Block/ East Ave. D San Angelo Texas 27
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Automated Meter Reading System (AMR)Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 3,750,000 1,300,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 - - - - $ 7,550,000Description:There are approximately 33,000 water meters in the Citys water system. The existing meters will be replaced or upgraded with electronic meterregistering equipment. Meter readings will be transmitted automatically through a wireless network to the utility billing office. The system will eliminatethe need to manually read meters. Customer service will be improved by having timely and accurate meter information and leak detection monitoringwhich can notify a customer automatically of unusual water usage. Existing meter readers will be reassigned to system maintenance in the distributionsystem.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 7,500,000 4,332,815 Other - - Total $ 7,500,000 $ 4,332,815 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: then click Browse… Implementation: 2011 65% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 7,500,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Rreduction of two meter reader positions $ (44,000) (45,000) (46,000) (46,000) (46,000)Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ -Performance Measure:Meter readings will be obtained each month on a fixed date allowing for improved billing of the account.Notes:A total of 21,288 meters have been converted to AMR. 5,600 AMR units or in stock to be installed.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $3,515,993 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) City wide San Angelo Texas 28
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Clay Pipe ReplacementsResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 2,000,000 997,896 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 66,000,000 $ 73,997,896Description:Clay sewer mains were the industry standard prior to the 1980s. It is a strong but brittle pipe which does not perform well with soil movement. Highlysusceptible to root intrusion, inflow, cracking and clogging. Traditional joints are not considered water or root proof. These mains are aging rapidly andoften fail causing overflows. These overflows are monitored by the TCEQ and EPA and environmental fines can be assessed. The program is acontinual capital replacement program in which aged and failing mains will be replaced on a condition and age priority.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 74,000,000 2,000,000 Other - - Total $ 74,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Project Schedule: % Complete Design: In-house 100% Implementation: ongoing 3% Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 74,000,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased cost for repairs to mains and manholes $ 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000Performance Measures:Approximately 15,000 ft. of pipe will be replaced each year.Notes:Identification and selection of projects underway. First project was bid in 2010.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $64,673,971 Not Completing Project $108,455Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) City wide San Angelo Texas 29
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Collector Main ReplacementsResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 12,700,000 7,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - $ 23,700,000Description:Replacement of aging and failing sewer collector mains. Sewer collector mains are generally larger than 12 inches in diameter and serve large areasof the population. Many of these large aged lines are concrete. Concrete mains are highly susceptible to corrosive gases and the pipes degrade tofailure. Failure of these lines cause large service area disruptions and environmental fines can be substantial. This is a long term continual project.As the aged mains are replaced, newer mains are aging to the point of potential failure. In addition, growth of the City places ever increasing loads onthese lines making the continued reliable service even more critical. As the City grows many of these mains will need to be replaced with larger mainsor additional mains to handle service loads.Supporting planning document(s):Wastewater collection system master plan Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 23,700,000 12,700,000 Other - - Total $ 23,700,000 $ 12,700,000 Project Schedule: % Complete Design: In-house 100% Implementation: 2011 54% Funding Sources: Amount Wastewater CIP Fund $ 23,700,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased repairs of old mains $ 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000Performance Measures:About 10,000 ft of 42" main were installed under the 2007 contract and about 7,300 ft of 30" main was replaced in the 2010 contract.Notes:42" on Christoval Rd complete December 2008. 36" along Rio Concho Dr. were designed and bid in 2010.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $10,816,939 Not Completing Project $84,819Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 42" main-1800 Christoval Rd. San Angelo Texas 2) 30 MAIN-1002 Rio Concho Dr. 30
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Hickory Water Supply Development Phase IResponsible Division: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 18,000,000 35,000,000 37,000,000 30,000,000 - - - - $ 120,000,000Description:Development of the Hickory Water Supply will provide the city with an underground water supply. The project will be developed in three phases.Phase I will begin in 2011 and be operational by 2014. It will consist of installation of pumps in 9 existing wells, construction of well field collectorpipelines, construction of a booster pump station at the well field, construction of about 60 miles of 30 inch transmission main from the well field to thecity and construction of a treatment facility.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design 17,000,000 17,000,000 Construction 103,000,000 1,000,000 Other - - Total $ 120,000,000 $ 18,000,000 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2011 100% then click Browse… Implementation:2013 0% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Water Fund $ 94,500,000 Type B sales tax $ 25,500,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Undetermined $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Undetermined $ - - - - -Performance Measure:Phase I of the project will provide the city with 6 million gallons per day, about 6,700 acre-feet per year of water.Notes:Well field collector pipeline on existing wells is complete. 30 inch transmission main is 60% complete. Booster Pump Station is on schedule.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $100,201,794 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Melvin Texas 31
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan High Service Pump Station RehabilitationResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - 3,950,000 - - - - - - $ 3,950,000Description:The High Service Pump Station consists of 6 pumps which pump water from the Water Treatment Plant into the distribution system and tanksthroughout the City. This station is critical to the continual delivery of water to the citizens and customers of the City of San Angelo. Pumps 1 & 2 arein a 1940s era station and the pumps have been in service since that time. Pumps 3 thru 6 were installed in the 1960s and have been replaced withnew pumps over the last 5 years. Pumps 1 and 2 need to be completely replaced and the electrical equipment on pumps 3 thru 6 needs to bereplaced.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 3,950,000 2,961,233 Other - - Total $ 3,950,000 $ 2,961,233 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 100% then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2012-2013 75% Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 3,950,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased repairs to pumps and motor $ 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000Performance Measures:High Service Pump Station #1 is substantially complete. Replace electrical equipment on remaining pumps still remains to be completed.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $3,950,000 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 327 E. Ave I San Angelo Texas 32
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Lift Station ImprovementsResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 320,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 $ 1,720,000Description:The City of San Angelo has 48 lift stations and 151 grinder stations that it operates and maintains. Each year several stations are added based on Citygrowth. These pump stations are mostly mechanical and electrical in nature and operate in highly corrosive environments. The expected operating lifeof pumps is 5 years and that is with consistent maintenance. This program is intended to continually replace pumps and electrical components forcontinued reliable service. Failure of these systems affects regional areas of population and can result in sewer overflows and possible flooding ofcustomer facilities. The program will also include the addition of telemetry equipment at the lift stations to provide for 24 hour per day remotemonitoring of the lift stations for and alarms or problems.Supporting planning document(s):Wastewater collection system master plan Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 1,720,000 320,000 Other - - Total $ 1,720,000 $ 320,000 Project Schedule: % Complete Design: In-house 100% Implementation: ongoing 20% Funding Sources: Amount Wastewater CIP Fund $ 1,720,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased cost for maintenance of lift stations $ 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 40,000Performance Measures:Rehabilitation work will be done on about 3 stations each year.Notes:Continual capital replacement program for lift station pumps and electrical systems through out the year.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,324,049 Not Completing Project $179,361Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) City wide San Angelo Texas 33
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Nasworthy Dam Emergency SpillwayResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - - 2,000,000 - - - - $ 2,000,000Description:A portion of the earthen embankment section along the southern portion of Nasworthy Dam is designed to serve as an emergency spillway for thedam. The emergency spillway consists of two lowered sections of the dams embankment which would be overtopped when discharges occur. Theearthen spillways however do not have any protection from erosion of a discharge, the result which would be a wash out and failure of the damsection. The spillways need to be modified to withstand overtopping flows with reinforced concrete paving and a 500 ft. diversion dike and channeldownstream of the dam to protect the downstream toe of the dam.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 2,000,000 - Other - - Total $ 2,000,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0% then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2013 0% Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 2,000,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Modification of the emergency spillways will bring the facility into compliance with TCEQ dam design standards.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,926,112 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 1900 Beaty Rd. San Angelo Texas 34
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Nasworthy Dam Stop Log SystemResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - - - 750,000 - - - $ 750,000Description:Stop logs are a gate system that is used to isolate a radial gate on the dam for servicing or to stop water discharge through the gate bay in the event ofa failure of a radial gate. The dam currently has a full length slide gate which is installed in the gate bay to isolate a gate. The slide gate must bemoved by a large crane from the downstream side of the dam and can only be installed when the radial gate is closed. With this system, there is noway to install a stop gate when water is flowing through a radial gate bay. A new stop log system is needed whereby the stop logs can be installedfrom the bridge deck with flow going through the gate bay.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 750,000 - Other - - Total $ 750,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0% then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2013 0% Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 750,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Performance Measures:The stop log system will allow a gate on the dam to be isolated in an emergency situationNotes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $708,824 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 1900 Beaty Rd. San Angelo Texas 35
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Lake Nasworthy Gate OperatorsResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - 1,034,000 2,216,000 - - - - - $ 3,250,000Description:Nasworthy Dam has 15 radial gates that are used to release flood waters through the dam. The gates are operated by two mobile operators that aremounted on carts which are pulled between gates. The operators are original equipment from when the dam was constructed in 1929. The averagetime to set up, open a gate and move to the next gate is 25 minutes. Based on the gate operating time needed to pass the probable maximum localflood for the reservoir, the current operating speed is not adequate to keep floodwaters from overtopping the gates. The proposed project will install apermanent operating winch on each gate. This will allow multiple gates to be operated within the time needed to pass the design flood. Theimprovements will bring the gate operations into compliance with TCEQ dam regulations.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 3,250,000 - Other - - Total $ 3,250,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2013 0% then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2014 0% Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 3,250,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Replacement of the gate operators will bring the facility into compliance with TCEQ regulations.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $3,208,681 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 1900 Beaty Rd. San Angelo Texas 36
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Transmission Line Valves ReplacementResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 1,650,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 - - - $ 3,650,000Description:This project is the replacement of aged and failing transmission valves. Transmission lines are larger than 16" and serve large areas of the population.Valves on these lines are rarely used and have not been routinely exercised. Older valves utilized steel discs and seats and are highly susceptible tocorrosion. Deposits in the seats and on the discs prevent the valves from seating and degradation of the steel slides and gates cause valves to seizeor bind and break. Continual maintenance and replacement of valves over the long term is required to maintain a consistent and reliable system.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 3,650,000 1,650,000 Other - - Total $ 3,650,000 $ 1,650,000 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2010 100% then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2011 45% Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 3,650,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Additional time and resources to isolate pipe segments $ 15,000 20,000 20,000 - -for repair of leaks and water shut off to large areas of the cityPerformance Measures:Valves are to be replaced annually.Notes:22 valves were replaced in the 2008 contract.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,944,755 Not Completing Project $52,883Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Various sites in SMD 1,2,3,4,5,6 San Angelo Texas 37
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Transmission MainsResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 5,640,000 - 5,100,000 5,300,000 6,000,000 6,150,000 - - $ 28,190,000Description:Replacement and upgrade of transmission mains. These mains are larger than 16" in size and serve large areas of the populations. Reliable andcontinued service is required to move water from the plant to the tanks and pump stations throughout the City. Projects are planned as follows: 2006:Phase I-Southwest Feeder Transmission Main, $4,500,000; 2008: Ave I Main from Metcalfe to Chadbourne $1,140,000;2010: Ave. I Transmission Main Replacement from Chadbourne to Bryant Blvd, $1,600,0002012: 20" Ave. K Transmission Main, $3,500,000Future Projects: 2014: Phase II-Southwest Feeder Transmission Main, $5,300,000; 2016: North Transmission Main Improvements, $6,000,000.Upper plane transmission mains which serve the highest growth areas will likely begin requiring upgrades by the 2017 timeframe, $6,150,000.Supporting planning document(s):Water System Master Plan Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 28,190,000 5,640,000 Other - - Total $ 28,190,000 $ 5,640,000 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2011 20% Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 28,190,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased repairs to existing mains and more interruption $ 30,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 40,000of service to large areas of the city due to the leaks.Performance Measures:Approximately 5,600 ft of 20" water main are planned to be replaced.Notes:2006 Southwest Feeder Main complete and placed in service January 15, 2008. Ave I main replacement work complete in 2009.Project % Completion: Southwest Feeder Phase I (100%); Ave I (0%); Ave K (0%); Southwest Feeder Phase II (0%); North (0%); Upper Plane (0%)Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $21,891,876 Not Completing Project $174,454Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 100 Ave I San Angelo Texas 38
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Twin Buttes Eco-System RestorationResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 900,000 100,000 - - - - - $ 1,000,000Description:The project will provide for the removal of invasive brush in the lake basin. The project consists of the removal of 3,900 acres of salt cedar & willowbaccharis and 5,600 acres of mesquite.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 800,000 700,000 Other 200,000 200,000 Total $ 1,000,000 $ 900,000Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert Project Schedule: % Complete in the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from Design:File, then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Implementation: 2013 90% Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 225,000 Water Operating $ 375,000 State Soil and Water Board $ 400,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Approximately 9,500 acres will be cleared of invasive brush in the reservoir basin.Notes:Initial work began in 2010 with be spraying of salt cedar in the upper reaches of the reservoir. Each year additional areas will be sprayedproceeding down through the basin to the dam.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $100,000 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 6 miles Southwest of San Angelo San Angelo Texas 39
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Water Billing and Customer Service Office RemodelingResponsible Division: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - 500,000 500,000 - - - - - $ 1,000,000Description:Remodel the existing building to provide for a modern work environment by replacing electrical wiring, restrooms, new work areas for customer servicerepresentatives and billing personnel, exterior repairs and painting, handicapped accessibly entrance, increased security for cash collections.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design 100,000 - Construction 900,000 - Other - - Total $ 1,000,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2013 0% then click Browse… Implementation: end-2014 0% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 1,000,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Undetermined $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Undetermined $ - - - - -Performance Measure:20 employees currently occupy the building. This will create a better working environment for these employees that assist in approximately 50,000 call-ins a year. Remodeling the building will also impact the 30,000 walk-in customers that access the building annually.Notes:The facility will be evaluated for remodeling or replacement. Construction planned for the end of 2014.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $990,677 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 122 W. 1st St. San Angelo Texas 40
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Water Main ReplacementsResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 15,731,509 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 29,230,000 $ 52,761,509Description:This is an ongoing water mains replacement program initiated in 2001 with priority replacement of 2" mains throughout the City. The 2" mainreplacement program is continuing with primary emphasis until the 2011-2012 time frame. Gradually the emphasis will be moving to rusty water mainsand aged cast iron mains. Since 2001: 334,000 feet of 2" mains replaced. 90,000 feet of 2" mains remaining. Cast iron and rusty mains: 470,000 feetof mains to replace at projected cost of $30,930,000. This is a continuous capital requirement for rehabilitation and replacement of aging distributionsystems. As systems are replaced, other sections are aging to the point of need for replacement.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 52,761,509 15,731,509 Other - - Total $ 52,761,509 $ 15,731,509 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: In-House 100% then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2001/ongoing 30% Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 52,761,509Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased cost for repairs to mains and additional $ 30,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000flushing of mains to maintain water quality.Performance Measures:Approximately 15,000 ft of mains will be replace each year.Notes:This is an ongoing capital maintenance program.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $33,552,460 Not Completing Project $160,541Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Various locations in SMD 1,2,3,4,5,6 San Angelo Texas 41
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Water Reclamation Plant ImprovementsResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 $ 1,800,000Description:The Water Reclamation Facility treats all of the wastewater from the City of San Angelo and delivers to irrigation. The operating environment forwastewater treatment is harsh on all systems including mechanical, electrical and concrete. There are hundreds of mechanical systems in the plantincluding pumps, clarifiers, air scrubbers, sludge belts, blowers, heat exchangers and more. Most of these systems need some type of major repair orreplacement every 5 years. Concrete walls of basins and equipment are subject to corrosive properties present at wastewater plants and need repairand rehabilitation every 5 to 6 years. This program schedules funding to facilitate repair, rehabilitation or replacement on a condition and critical prioritybasis.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 1,800,000 400,000 Other - - Total $ 1,800,000 $ 400,000 Project Schedule: % Complete Design: In-house 100% Implementation: ongoing 22% Funding Sources: Amount Wastewater CIP Fund $ 1,800,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased costs to repair in the future due to continual $ 100,000 100,000 150,000 150,000 150,000deterioration of facilitiesPerformance Measures:Repairs to various structures and mechanical equipment with a life expectancy of 10 years.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,324,049 Not Completing Project $611,841Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 1898 City Farm Rd. San Angelo Texas 42
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan WTP Equipment ImprovementsResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 500,000 300,000 200,000 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 $ 2,200,000Description:Rehabilitation and replacement of aging water treatment plant equipment based on condition, age and criticality. Equipment includes items such asflocculator mechanisms, clarifier mechanisms, filters, plant valves and other plant operation mechanisms.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 2,200,000 500,000 Other - - Total $ 2,200,000 $ 500,000 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2010 100% then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: ongoing 23% Funding Sources: Amount Water CIP Fund $ 2,200,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased maintenance of equipment and eventual shut down $ 25,000 35,000 50,000 50,000 50,000of equipment when it can no longer be repairedPerformance Measures:Control valves, clarifier equipment and electrical equipment will be replaced with a life expectancy of about 20 years.Notes:Projects include work on control valves and electrical service in the filter building.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,616,660 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 327 E Ave I San Angelo Texas 43
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Wastewater Service to Existing Developed AreasResponsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky DicksonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 3,000,000 1,200,000 - - - - - 13,000,000 $ 17,200,000Description:Some areas of the City do not have wastewater service. To establish service to the areas may require construction of new collector mains, servicemains and lift stations. The estimated cost to provide service to the following areas is as listed below.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date No. Area Estimated Cost ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - 1 Green Acres $3.0 Million Construction 17,000,000 3,000,000 Other - - 2 Mercedes & Townview $500,000 Total $ 17,000,000 $ 3,000,000 3 Red Bluff $2.0 Million 4 Country Club Lake Estates $2.0 Million Project Schedule: % Complete Design: In-house 100% Implementation: 2010 18% 5 Country Club Road $3.5 Million 6 Butler Farm $2.0Million Funding Sources: Amount 7 Los Lomas $2.0 Million Wastewater CIP Fund $ 17,000,000 Total $15.0 MillionOperating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased revenue from new wastewater customers $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Lost revenue from residents not on City wastewater $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Provide municipal wastewater service to residents that currently have on site wastewater disposal systems.Notes:Extension of wastewater service to the Red Bluff area to complete the sewer collection system at Lake Nasworthy planned to begin in 2013Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $12,811,167 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Various locations in SMD 1,2,6 San Angelo Texas 44
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Replace School Zone and Crosswalk EquipmentResponsible Dept: Traffic Operations Project Manager: Shane KeltonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 68,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 - $ 158,000Description:Replace crosswalk signs with the bright yellow green high reflectivity signs. Replace or update time clocks with new clocks that also can be sent timeand date information via radio or pager signal. Replace painted crosswalks with thermo plastic heat tape. Replacement of crosswalk signs andcrosswalks will provide improved visibility for pedestrian safety.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction - - Other 158,000 68,000 Total $ 158,000 $ 68,000 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0% then click Browse… Implementation: 2012 60% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Tom Green County Fee $ 158,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Annual electrical savings of $4,500.00 per year. $ (4,500) (4,500) (4,500) (4,500) (4,500)Replace Thermoplastic - - - - 32,500Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Continued cost of repainting crosswalks. $ 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000Performance Measures:150 Signs have been replaced at all school crossings and all crosswalks have been marked with thermo plastic material.Notes:Funding Source - Crosswalk Guard and Equipment Revenues collected by Tom Green County Fee. Radios and time clocks will be upgraded asfunds are available from the county. The thermoplastic crosswalk material will reduce the maintenance of crosswalks to once every five years fromrepainting crosswalks every two months.Traffic Operations Divisions currently maintains 150 crosswalks. The cost to replace with thermoplastic every 5 years will cost approximately$32,500.00.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $95,013 Not Completing Project $99,269Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) City Wide San Angelo Texas 45
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Sign Reflectivity UpgradeResponsible Division: Traffic Operations Project Manager: Shane KeltonFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 94,000 48,000 56,550 57,681 58,834 60,011 61,211 141,077 $ 577,364Description:Upgrade informational, warning and regulatory signs to meet newly established federal required mandates for reflectivity. The Traffic Division hasinventoried and tested the retroreflectivity of all the City signs. They currently have maintenance responsibily for approximately 12,000 informational,warning and regulatory signs. Tests revealed 30% have failed and are in need of replacement. The Federal Highway Administration has extendedthe deadline for the replacement of failed signs from 2018 to 2020. In order to stay in compliance with the mandate the Traffic Division will have toreplace approximately 870 signs a year. This number includes the 3,600 that are currently out of compliance and the extimated 5% that will fail eachof the following years. The replacement of signs to stay in compliance will be an ongoing responsibility well past the compliance deadline.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction - - Other 577,364 94,000 Total $ 577,364 $ 94,000 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0% then click Browse… Implementation: ongoing 30% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount General Fund $ 577,364Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increase in operation budget to meet and maintain federal 122,550 126,081 129,730 133,502 137,402mandate. This includes the cost of two additional full timeemployees and O&M of an additional vehicle.Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Potential Gross Negligence Liablity $ - - - - -Performance Measure:In order to maintain and stay in compliance with the federal mandates the Traffic Division will be required to replace approximately 870 signs peryear.Notes:COMPLIANCE DATES: January 2012-Implement a sign maintenance program that addresses the minimum sign retroreflectivity requirements.January 2017-Complaince with the new retroreflectivity requirements for most of their traffic signs they have installed, including all red and white orwhite and black "regulatory" signs, yellow and black "warning" signs and ground-mounted green and white "guide" signs (except street name signs).January 2020-Compliance with the new retroreflectivity requirements for all signs.The Traffic Operations Division has inventoried all signs for a total of 12,000. Of the 12,000 30% have failed the retroreflectivity tests for minimumrequirements. Of the remaining 8,400 signs we are estimating that approximately 5% of those will fail the retroreflectometer test on a yearly basisuntil all signs have been replaced after 8 years.Mandated by Federal Highway Administration - If not completed the City may be found at fault for Gross Negligence Liability. In order toaccomplish this project and remain in compliance the Traffic Division has hired an additional two full time employees and will purchase a vehicle.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,065,185 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) City Wide San Angelo Texas 46
    • 2013-2018 CapitalImprovement PlanOther Projects LEVEL 2 Airport City Operations Facilities Community Facilities and parks City Facilities Environmental Equipment Technology
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Apron Joint SealResponsible Dept: Airport Project Manager: Luis ElguezabalFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - - - 54,900 555,555 - - $ 610,455Description:Design, engineering, and construction for the sealcoat and pavement rehabilitation of the terminal building apron and Runway 9-27 and 18-36. Overtime joint seals deteriorate causing water to penetrate the sub-surface and damage the pavement. Joint seals need to be replaced in order toextend the life of the pavement.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - Design 54,900 Construction 555,555 Other - Total $ 610,455 $ - Project Schedule: % Complete Design: 2016 0% Implementation: 2017 0% Funding Sources: Amount FAA Grant $ 549,410 PFC Fund $ 61,045Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Pavement maintenance $ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased pavement maintenance $ 15,000 15,000 25,000 45,000 45,000Performance Measures:The area that will need the Apron Joint Seal is approximately 359,000 SQ FT.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $589,909 Not Completing Project $135,484Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 8618 Terminal Circle San Angelo Texas 48
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Runway 3-21 Runway Lights and Airport Beacon ReplacementResponsible Dept: Airport Project Manager: Luis ElguezabalFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - 631,889 - - - $ 631,889Description:Design, engineering, and construction for high intensity runway lights for Runway 3-21 and also improvements to the rotating beacon and electricalvault. This lighting system is 11 years old and has failed. The FAA has allocated funds for the replacement and repair of this system this fiscal year.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design 55,556 - Construction 576,333 - Other - - Total $ 631,889 $ -Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert Project Schedule: % Complete in the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from Design: 2013 0%File, then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Implementation: 2013 0% Funding Sources: Amount FAA Grant $ 568,700 PFC Fund $ 63,189Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Decreased maintenance costs $ 1,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 5,000Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Future failure and unreliable system $ 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000Performance Measures:Total of 70 lights in the system. Annual replacement of 12% of lights per year is expected until the system is re-constructed.Notes:The system has failed. FAA has allocated funds for the replacement of the circuit this year.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $648,728 Not Completing Project $189,083Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 8618 Terminal Circle, Suite-101 San Angelo Texas 49
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Airport Terminal RenovationResponsible Dept: Airport Project Manager: Luis ElguezabalFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 1,239,379 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 600,862 - - $ 6,280,241Description:The San Angelo Regional Airport is currently modernizing the existing terminal building. The project consists of remodeling of the landside functionsto relate to the new concourse, improve the passenger experience, and provide an aesthetic enhancement with a regional identity.Specifically, construction consists of exterior and driveway improvements such as: new entry monument sign, terminal entrance pavementenhancements, curbside canopies, and air traffic control tower renovations.Improvements to the interior includes items such as: new entrance and exit vestibules, relocation and configuration of the airline ticket counters andbaggage claim belt, improvements to the security check point to assist with the screening process, structural modifications to accommodate a viewfrom the entrance to the arrival/departure escalator area, relocation of the airport administrative offices, adjustments to the HVAC, security, fireprotection, and IT systems, and enhancements to the meet and greet area.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design 354,526 354,526 Construction 5,925,715 884,853 Other Total $ 6,280,241 $ 1,239,379 Project Schedule: % Complete Design: 12-2010 100% Implementation: Start Date 01-2012 20% Completion: 11-2013 0% Funding Sources: Amount FAA Grant $ 5,491,230 PFC Funds $ 289,011 Type B Sales Tax $ 500,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18More efficiency, less maintenance, improved aesthetics. $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Project is scheduled to be completed in 540 days. Contractor has used 343 days or about 64% of the time is used.Notes:Note that although 64% of the time allotted for completion has elapsed, only 20% of the project has been completed. Construction is about 6months behind.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $4,874,613 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 8618 Terminal Circle San Angelo Texas 50
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan EOC HVAC ReplacementResponsible Dept: Emergency Management Project Manager: Teresa CoveyFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 500,000 - - - - - $ 500,000Description:The current HVAC system at the EOC is the original installed when the building was constructed 26 years ago. Replacement parts are scarce tonon-existent. Only TWO repair men at Duncan Mechanical Services are capable of making repairs at this time. The pneumatic control system isinefficient and unreliable, constantly cooling or heating, which in turn cost unnecessary utility expenses. We recommend the purchase of a newmore energy efficient system. Total HVAC replacement will reduce the ongoing electrical costs and maintenance repairs.Supporting planning document(s):Ron Lewis, COSA Construction and Facilities Maintenance, and WTA Engineering provided the necessary preliminary cost analysis. The estimateof $327,000 in 2008 has been adjusted by a minimum of 10% for each year since 2008 to cover inflation costs. Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design 75,000 - Construction 425,000 - Other - - Total $ 500,000 $ - Project Schedule: % Complete Design: 2014 0% Implementation: 2014 0% Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 500,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Savings on Maintenance and Repairs $ (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000)Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Repairs and Maintenance $ 5,000 5,500 6,050 6,655 7,320Performance Measures:Notes:If the HVAC system is not replaced, maintenance costs will continue to increase as the amount of leaks in the hot water lines throughout the buildingcontinue to increase. Options for repairs are limited due to lack of the antiquated pneumatic system. Budget Impact if NOT completed reflects anannual 10% increase in cost. If a repair needs to be made, we will take this request forward for approval, on an as needed basis.If the HVAC system is not replaced and repairs are needed at a time when the EOC is activated, this will create a hardship on key personnel at atime of critical decision making. The City of San Angelo Emergency Management Department is bound by contract with the FAA to maintain thefacility at 8485 Hangar Road.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $467,042 Not Completing Project $28,756Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 8485 Hangar Rd. San Angelo Texas 51
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Fire Station #4 ReconstructionResponsible Dept: Fire Project Manager: Brian DunnFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - - 2,580,000 - - - - $ 2,580,000Description:Relocate Fire Station #4 and reconstruct. Station 4 was constructed in 1965 and has never been improved. A fire truck cannot be purchased thatwill fit in the engine bay of Station 4. Additionally, the station will be made gender compliant. The city has been in discussions with GAFB aboutbuilding the station on the corner of Bell Street and Paint Rock Road. There are several items the city will have to address if this location isapproved. We will have to re-fence the area, move some water boxes, and move a gas main. We will also be responsible for some paving. We arelooking for alternate locations at this time in case this site falls through.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land 80,000 3,684 Design 65,000 - Construction 2,435,000 - Other - Total $ 2,580,000 $ 3,684 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 100% then click Browse… Implementation: 2014 0% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount General Fund C.O. $ 2,580,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Improved response time, lower the ISO ratingNotes:Improved response times and geographically locating fire stations has an impact on the citys ISO rating. The ISO rating is the rating system inwhich insurance companies base their insurance premiums to commercial and residential customers. The City of San Angelo will be graded in thesummer of 2008. The city should get an improved rating which will in turn reduce premiums for the citizens and businesses in the City of SanAngelo.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $2,484,685 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 702 E. Ave. L San Angelo Texas 52
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Fire Training FacilityResponsible Dept: Fire Project Manager: Brian DunnFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - 1,200,000 1,400,000 - - - - - $ 2,600,000Description:A new fire training facility located behind the animal shelter on U.S. 67 North. This facility will have a classroom and office building and a fire burnbuilding. This facility will replace the current training center on Avenue L that is approaching 50 years of age. The current training center is locatedon the Concho river across from the city water intake. TCEQ has basically shut down many of our fire training operations because of the proximity ofthe river.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 2,600,000 - Other - - Total $ 2,600,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount Federal EDA Grant $ 1,200,000 General Fund Bond $ 1,400,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18At this point there isnt any impact to the operating budget $ - - - - -Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 $ - - - - -Performance Measures:The ability to train current personnel and future personnelNotes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $2,573,896 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Behind 3142 u.s. 67 north San Angelo Texas 53
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Chase State Office Building ImprovementsResponsible Dept: Fort Concho/State Building Project Manager: Robert BluthardtFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - 200,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 $ 300,000Description:The sprinkler risers in the Chase State Office Building are almost 60 years old and should be replaced. Also, approximately 600 feet of thesystem piping has had numerous small leaks in the past five years, thus endangering whole sections of office and public space. This project willreplace them over a three year period.Office and hallway carpets need to be replaced throughout the Chase State Office Building and Concho Valley Workforce Building in the comingyears, due to wear and tear, safety and fulfillment of exisiting leases. A multi-year plan will accommodate these needs within available funding.HVAC units at the State Buidlings range from 10 to 12 years old and will start to fail in the coming years. To maintain proper climate control withincreasingly efficient equipment, a multi-year replacement plan is necessary.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 300,000 - Other - - Total $ 300,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 2017/2018 0% Funding Sources: Amount Fund 201 State Office Building $ 300,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Completing the project will reduce maintenance costs andC l ti th j t ill d i t t d $ (2,500) (5,000) (10,000) (12,500) (15,000)reduce energy consumption.Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Repair and spot replacement for carpet $ 1,000 3,000 5,000 7,000 9,000HVAC repairs 5,000 5,000 7,500 7,500 10,000Performance Measures:No leaks or drops in the system pressure over time. Easier cleaning by custodial contractor; no complaints from lessees. Increased energyefficiency and content state staffers.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $247,084 Not Completing Project $56,147Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 622 South Oaks San Angelo Texas 54
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Boat Storage DockResponsible Dept: Police Department Project Manager: Chief Tim VasquezFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 75,000 - - - - - $ 75,000Description:The San Angelo Police Department Lake Patrol is in need of a boat storage dock on Lake Nasworthy. Currently the boats are stored offsite. Whenthe Lake Patrol Officer receives a call on Lake Nasworthy, they must first go to the storage facility to retrieve the boat. It takes an average of 20minutes from the time the call is received to the time the boat is on the water. With a boat dock on Lake Nasworthy the responding officer will beable to go straight to the lake and drop the boat in the water. This will cut 20 minutes off the response time to an emergency on the lake.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design 5,000 - Construction 70,000 - Other - - Total $ 75,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 75,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Cut storage rental fees $ (1,560) (1,560) (1,560) (1,560) (1,560)Electricity 700 725 750 775 800Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18None $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Decrease response time to emergency calls on Lake Nasworthy by 20 minutes.Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $69,768 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Undetermined San Angelo Texas 55
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Mobile Command Center Storage FacilityResponsible Dept: Police Department Project Manager: Chief Tim VasquezFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 60,000 - - - - - $ 60,000Description:The Police Department has a mobile command center that is used at various events around the city and at critical calls. It is currently housed at theCity Shop but is not covered. There is a lot of electronic equipment mounted on top and on the sides of the command center that need to beprotected from the weather. Being exposed to the sun also is causing damage to the exterior of the command center. This command center needsto able to be deployed anytime under any circumstances. The storage facility would protect it from dangerous weather and allow it to be ready to bedeployed when needed.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 60,000 - Other - - Total $ 60,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0% then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 60,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Cost of electric service to the facility $ 900 925 950 975 1,000Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18None $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Notes:Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $63,368 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 401 E. Beauregard San Angelo Texas 56
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Police Department Administration BuildingResponsible Dept: Police Department Project Manager: Chief Tim VasquezFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ 135,067 - 25,775,000 - - - $ 25,910,067Description:The current HQ building was constructed in 1963 and was originally designed to house the Police Dept., Municipal Court, and a City Jail. At the present time, theSAPD is housed in six separate facilities. In 2011 an architect firm completed a feasibility analysis of the current facility and future needs. The analysis cited thefollowing deficiencies: 1. Lack of adequate square footage 2. Lack of code compliance (ADA and Life Safety) 3. Separation of public and staff areas 4. Inadequatebuilding systems (electrical, plumbing, HVAC, etc) 5. Lack of public and staff parking 6. Structural concerns (both at HQ bldg. and auxiliary facilities. The probablesteps in the project are: 1. Site selections and acquisition 2. Design 3. Construction. A HQ building of approximately 108,000 sq. ft. and a parking structure aresuggested. Site costs are estimated at $775,000 to $2 million. HQ Building cost at $22 to $23 million ($220 to $230 sq.ft.) and parking structure $1.25 to $1.75million..Supporting planning document(s):Assessment & Feasibility analysis are available upon request. Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land 775,000 - Design 500,000 Construction 24,500,000 - Other 135,067 135,067 Total $ 25,910,067 $ 135,067 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2013 0.5% then click Browse… Implementation: 2014 0% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount General Fund $ 135,067 Future General Fund C.O. $ 25,775,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 $ (10,000) (20,000) (35,000) (60,000) (60,000)Reductions are expected in the departments operating budget. Buildingmaintenance and repairs will decrease as well as some personnel costs. Nosavings would be expected until construction is competed and will flattenonce maximum savings is achievedOperating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increases in the maintenance and upkeep of the current faclity will occur until $ 30,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 50,000a new facility is constructed or major renovations are completed at thecurrent bulding. Systems such as HVAC, Plumbing and Electrical will needupdating as will ADA compliance issues. (increase to current budget islisted) -- renovations would increase the estimated costs by 3 to 5 times theamounts listedPerformance Measure:Notes:The original needs assessment and feasibility study was completed mid 2011. This confirmed the SAPDs assertion that new facilities were needed.City council members were invited to tour current facilities and were thoroughly convinced a new facility was in order. The City Manager andAssistant City managers were on board with re-evaluating a new police facilities placement on the CIP list.While the cost of new construction is high, the cost of acceptable renovations would equal or exceed the cost of constructions, and still not addressparking and home land security preferences for public safety facilities. Moving forward with new facilities in a timely fashion will also save money inthe long run. Construction costs are estimated to increase 4% annually.25% reduction in total utility costs (+/- $25,000) ---- 33% reduction in maintenance personnel (+/- $35,000) --- Revenue increases from communityroom rental ($7,500) ---- Increased revenue from additional training program ($3000) -- the value of increased service/accessibility to the public cantbe measured nor can the safety and security afforded by modern faciltiies. Potential for litigations should also be a concern (ADA or injury litigation)but again these things cant be measured.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $25,121,999 Not Completing Project $207,096Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 401 E. Beauregard San Angelo Texas 57
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Auditorium RenovationResponsible Dept: Civic Events Project Manager: Angelica PenaFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - 1,435,803 2,314,197 - - - - $ 3,750,000Description:Renovation of City Auditorium. This project includes shared costs with the City Hall renovation for the HVAC system. The balance of the availablefunds will address needs that include a fire suppression system, ceiling repairs, restroom renovations, theatrical lighting, rigging and sound systems,and aesthetics. The architect is determining which of those needs can be afforded with the $1.7 million that remains. Future improvements will becoordinated with the San Angelo Performing Arts Coalition, which is raising funds to address those needs. To date, improvements made are theinstallation of the Central plant (HVAC system) and some minor plumbing issues have been addressed.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design 334,500 334,500 Construction 3,415,500 1,101,303 Other - - Total $ 3,750,000 $ 1,435,803 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2011 100% then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2014 30% Funding Sources: Amount Type B Sales Tax $ 3,750,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Likely none. The City is expected to execute an agreement $ - - - - -with SAPAC for the operation of the venue once it reopens reopens.That agreement will include clauses to ensure that Cityexpenses are wholly reimbursed.Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18None. $ - - - - -Performance Measures:SAPAC believes a fully renovated facility will result in continuous use of the venue throughout the calendar year. In years past, the venue hasaccommodated approximately 65 events per year.Notes:The City and SAPAC have entered into an agreement as of December 2012. SAPAC will be making additional improvements outside of the City-funded portion of this project.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $3,664,505 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 72 W. College Ave. San Angelo Texas 58
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Fairgrounds Livestock BarnResponsible Dept: Civic Events Project Manager: Angelica PenaFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - 1,000,000 - - - - - $ 1,000,000Description:At the request of the San Angelo Stock Show and Rodeo Association, a $1 million initiative to build a new livestock barn to replace the Qualtrust Barnat the San Angelo Fairgrounds was included in the most recent half-cent sales tax initiative. Voters approved that initiative. Demolition of the currentfacility and construction of the new barn will begin following this years rodeo and stock show. The facility is expected to be available for use during nextyears stock show.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design 75,000 68,511 Construction 925,000 499,610 Other - - Total $ 1,000,000 $ 568,121 Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2011 91% then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2012 25% Funding Sources: Amount Type B Sales Tax $ 1,000,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18The barn will be operated and mainted by SASSRA, so there $ - - - - -will be no impact on the Citys budget though the facility City s budget,will allow for growth of the stock show, which generates ahuge amount of sales and hotel tax revenue for the City.Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Because the barn is operated by the SASSRA, there would $ - - - - -be no impact on the Citys budget.Performance Measures:Increased number of exhibitors at the annual stock show by approximately 200.Notes:This project is being driven by the SASSRA.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,000,000 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 4608 Grape Creek Road San Angelo Texas 59
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Coliseum ImprovementsResponsible Dept: Civic Events Project Manager: Angelica PenaFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 60,000 - - - - - $ 60,000Description:There are various improvements that need to be made to the Coliseum in order to properly maintain the facility. These improvements includespotlights, three new urinals, and a forklift. The spotlights that we currently have are at least 25 years old, inadequate, and parts are becomingincreasingly hard to find. We need 3 @ $7K a piece ($21,000). Three urinals at the coliseum need to be replaced as they currently leak and are rusted.3 @ $2K a piece ($6,000). Lastly, we need to replace our existing forklift. Our current forklift is barely operable and requires numerous hours of stafftime to keep it running. It is used almost daily and with our upcoming indoor football season, it will be in high demmand. ($33,000)Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction - - Other 60,000 - Total $ 60,000 $ -Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click Project Schedule: % Complete on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… then find Design: 0% picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount HOT fund balance $ 60,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Staff time saved in maintenance functions $ (3,300) (3,300) (3,300) (3,300) (3,300)Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18None $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Notes:Civic Events could potentially recoup $3-$5K by selling our current forklift through an online auction.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $43,282 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 50 E. 43rd St. San Angelo Texas 60
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Coliseum Roof RehabilitationResponsible Dept: Civic Events Project Manager: Angelica PenaFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 545,000 - - - - - $ 545,000Description:Foster Communications Coliseum has served this community well for 54 years. Theres no reason why it shouldnt serve San Angelo another 50 years… but only if it is properly maintained. The venues roof was recoated in 2001, though that project replaced foam on only 5 percent of the surface area.According to the company that then did that work, other areas of the original roof foam have since deteriorated because of a combination of wind, sun,weather and substrate movement. The roof substrate is close to realizing its expected life. That contractor recommends 100 percent of the roof shouldbe refoamed and recoated at an estimated cost of nearly $500,000. Without the rehabilitation, the community would eventually be looking at spendingtens of millions of dollars on a new venue.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design 37,500 - Construction 507,500 - Other - - Total $ 545,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0% then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount Potential: Type B Sales Tax, certificates of $ 545,000 general bonds, HOTOperating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No money is currently being spent on the roof, so there is no $ - - - - -impact on the budget budget.Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18None $ - - - - -Performance Measures:The Coliseum hosts approximately 40 events per year, drawing more than 80,000 people.Notes:The SASSRA would certainly have a vested interest in seeing this project completed. The original estimate of $500,000 is 3 years old. I am adding a3% increase per year to keep up with rising costs of material and labor.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $534,838 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 50 E. 43rd St. San Angelo Texas 61
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Convention Center ImprovementsResponsible Dept: Civic Events Project Manager: Angelica PenaFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - 36,831 83,069 - - - - - $ 119,900Description:There are several key improvements that need to be made to the Convention Center in order to properly preserve & maintain the Citys most oft usedfacility . The renovation did not include the replacement of its 1978 marquee, which shows its age. The sign should be replaced with a modern-daydigital marquee. ($45,000) Secondly, a security system has never been installed and is greatly needed in order to protect the taxpayers investment.($50,000) Next, the Convention Center is in dire need of new tables and chair carts. More tables would eliminate the need to borrow tables from theStock Show & Rodeo Association or the Fort. ($13,400) Lastly, the foyer/box office area has a large area of wall space that at one time was occupiedwith several small flat screen TVs. The purchase of a large 90" flat screen would offer opportuniutes for advertising revenue, informational posts, andoverall a more attractive appearance. ($11,500)Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction - - Other 119,900 - Total $ 119,900 $ -Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click Project Schedule: % Complete on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… then find Design: 0% picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0% Funding Sources: Amount HOT fund balance and Type B $ 83,069 Type B Sales Tax left over from Convention $ 36,831 Center renovationOperating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Staff time savings on maintenance functions $ (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200)Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18None $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Result & Efficiency: A new marquee would allow us to spolight more events, give us another tool for disseminating information and could yieldcost-efficiencies as a revenue generator through the selling of advertisements on itNotes:Citywise marketing may be able to help us recover costs by leveraging a sponsor who would have a static presence on the marquee. In addition theymay be able to sell advertising on the large flat screen TV.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $112,679 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 500 Rio Concho Drive San Angelo Texas 62
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Fort Concho Barracks 6 New FloorResponsible Dept: Fort Concho Project Manager: Robert BluthardtFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 15,000 - - - - - $ 15,000Description:Fort and city staff replaced the flagstone floor with a poured concrete pad in the spring of 2011. All material and equipment costs were coveredby the Fort Concho Foundation. While the new pad has eliminated safety concerns and has increased usage by staff and renters, we seekfunding to complete the project with a period board floor. This would enhance both the appearance and function of this building space.Supporting planning document(s):2007 Site Review Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design 1,000 - Construction 14,000 - Other - - Total $ 15,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2 months 0% then click Browse… Implementation: 6 months 0% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 15,000 Potential: HOT allocationOperating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased rental activity will cover anyI d t l ti it ill $ - - - - -proportional increase in utilities.Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Staff time and materials to spot-repair this floor year-to-year. $ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,500Performance Measures:More rentals of facility; increased vendor income at site festivals.Use and rental activity increases.Notes:Staff has estimated the project two ways: materials only with staff and inmate labor. The costs obviously increase if bid out as a total package.Staff can perform this project with inmate labor in an efficient and proper manner. The Fort Concho Board and staff ranked this project in the topfive in its 2007 site review.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $14,720 Not Completing Project $5,646Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) Flipper St. & Burgess St. San Angelo Texas 63
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Heating and Cooling Unit Replacements at Fort ConchoResponsible Division: Fort Concho Project Manager: Bob BluthardtFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 125,000 20,000 15,000 - - - $ 160,000Description:This CIP project proposes to replace the obsolete and inefficient heating/cooling units at five of the forts most used structures: Barracks 1 VisitorCenter, Officers Quarters 1, Officers Quarters 8, Quartermaster and Commissary. Also, we propose to add basic air conditioning to the Bay 3Stables Hall. Rental activity at all structures, especially the Stables, has increased in recent years but the Stables is not useable without airconditioning from May to September. These structures serve the public with public events and meetings, ongoing displays and programs, andpublic service. Combined, these six structures consume over 1/3 of the total site power usage. These six structures also serve the majority ofsite guests. Replacement would drastically decrease repair costs while reducing power consumption.Supporting planning document(s):Staff are compiling estimates for various replacement options at this time. Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 160,000 - Other - - Total $ 160,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: N/A 0% then click Browse… Implementation: 2016 0% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined. Potentially: $ 160,000 General Fund, HOT allocation, grantsOperating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Ongoing repairs lO i i less power savings i $ 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Ongoing repairs and possible replacement and lost revenue $ 7,500 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000Performance Measure:Fewer equipment breakdowns; lower repair costs; fewer visitor & guest complaints; lower power consumption levels for same five buildings.Notes:Notes: Replacing older and inefficient HVAC units will result in both lower repair costs and power consumption. Adding air conditioning to theStables will increase usage and rental revenue.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $202,933 Not Completing Project $72,469Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 630 S. Oakes St. San Angelo Texas 64
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Fort Concho Post BandstandResponsible Dept: Fort Concho Project Manager: Robert BluthardtFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 25,000 - - - - - $ 25,000Description:Located at the west end of the Parade Ground, the Post Bandstand represents one of the last exterior improvements for site development. Thebandstand would enhance the sites appearance, provide a historic setting for public programs and concerts, and serve various communitygroups. The Fort Concho Board is working with local professional building and trade groups to craft a reconstruction plan.Supporting planning document(s):2007 Site Review Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design - - Construction 25,000 - Other - - Total $ 25,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: Fall 2012 100% then click Browse… Implementation: Summer 2013 0% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Potential: Private funding, Fort Concho $ 25,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Utilities based on staff estimates.Utiliti b d t ff ti t $ 250 250 250 250 250Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18None $ - - - - -Performance Measures:New outdoor concerts; new public events.Notes:The Fort Concho Board and staff have ranked this project in the top five in its 2007 site review. Staff have estimated the materials for this projectat $15,000. Labor costs, if project is bid out, doubles overall costs.Update/January 2009 Staff arranging meeting with San Angelo Home Builders Association to explore volunteer assistance in construction.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $25,716 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 700 Block of S. Oakes San Angelo Texas 65
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Fort Concho Visitors Center Restoration ImprovementsResponsible Dept: Fort Concho Project Manager Robert BluthardtFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 100,000 750,000 250,000 400,000 - - $ 1,500,000Description:Barracks 1 was renovated as the forts Visitor Center as part of the major 1995 Regional Urban Design Assessment Team projects thattransformed the surrounding acres into El Paseo de Santa Angela. Unfortunately, the project ran out of money and the east bay of Barracks 1was left unfinished. A staff-board study has concluded that the restoration of this space must be tied to an overall building renovation to betterserve our guests. This renovation would include an expanded gift shop, visitor orientation area and theatre, climate controlled quality displayspace, and administrative offices. Staff will partner with several area cultural agencies to complete a Cultural District Study in the spring of2012. Formal planning of this Visitor Center will follow the recommendations of that study.Supporting planning document(s): Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - - Design 100,000 - Construction 1,400,000 - Other - - Total $ 1,500,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2013 0% then click Browse… Implementation: 2017 0% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Type B Sales Tax $ 1,000,000 Potential funding: San Angelo Health $ 500,000 Foundation, Meadows Foundation, and HoustonOperating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Extra RE t Revenue $ (10,000) (15,000) (17,500) (17,500) (17,500)Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Repairs and maintenance $ 5,000 7,500 15,000 17,500 20,000Performance Measures:Increased attendance: increased Gift Shop Sales; increased tour revenue; additional media attentionNotes:Project will focus on barracks 1; possibly barracks 2 and maybe partial reconstruction of Barracks 3-4.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,356,718 Not Completing Project $60,739Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 630 S. Oakes San Angelo Texas 66
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Fort Concho OQ 1 Rear Room & Roof RepairsResponsible Dept: Fort Concho Project Manager: Robert BluthardtFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 75,000 - - - - - $ 75,000Description:The rear room of Officers Quarters 1 lacks a proper floor and the entire rear section is showing signs of structural distress. Staff recommends anew concrete floor with a wooden floor to follow, relocation of utility pipes and lines, and new supports for the walls. A preliminary engineeringreport was completed in 2008. As this building is the citys VIP quarters and serves many guests and functions, these improvements are bothaesthetic and functional to the buildings future. The current room condition poses a major safety hazard to staff and contractors. Additionally,the dormers are failing and need repair.Supporting planning document(s):2008 Engineering Report Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land - Design 7,000 - Construction 68,000 - Other - - Total $ 75,000 $ - Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Project Schedule: % Complete Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2-4 months 0% then click Browse… Implementation: 4-6 months 0% Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 75,000 Potential: HOT allocation; private contributions -Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18UtilitiesUtiliti cost b t based on current events. d t t $ 750 750 750 750 750Revenue increase 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Performance Measures:Increase in building rentals.Increase in overall building usage.Notes:Preliminary study by staff, and local architect; engineering report available. Full plans available in 60 days.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $83,747 Not Completing Project $72,469Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) 111 East Ave. D San Angelo Texas 67
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Wayfinding Phases I-IIIResponsible Dept: Development Services Project Manager: AJ FawverFinancial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 - - $ 300,000Description:Wayfinding refers to the system of signs & symbols placed at the entrances & throughout districts, campuses & more recently, entire cities. The SanAngelo Convention & Visitors Bureau, City of San Angelo, COSADC/Chamber of Commerce & Angelo State University have jointly funded thedevelopment of a specifications & details manual for a city-wide wayfinding system was completed in 2010. Because one of the most frequentlyheard complaints businesses and destination operators hear is that visitors and newcomers to the city have difficulty finding our many sites ofinterest, cities must make the visitor/newcomer experience a positive one to ensure that tourists return and/or stay as long as possible. From anaesthetic standpoint, signs such as those contained in a typical wayfinding system help designate certain areas as unique or interesting forresidents as well.Supporting planning document(s):Wayfinding contract between San Angelo CVB and The Douglas Group, Staff Report to City Council regarding wayfinding Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date ROW/Easements/Land 10,000 - Design - - Construction 270,000 - Other 20,000 - Total $ 300,000 $ - Project Schedule: % Complete Design: 50% Implementation: 2012 0% Funding Sources: Amount Undetermined $ 300,000Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Damaged sign replacement $ 500 500 500 500 500Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact $ - - - - -Performance Measure:1.) Signs will be installed in three phases per the Wayfinding Master Plan. Performance will be measured by ability to fabricate and installsigns in accordance with the master plan. 2.) Increased visitorship at local tourist sites. 3.) Higher tourist satisfaction surveys (per CVB)Notes:Wayfinding signage, large and small, sends messages to the visitor, investor, and local citizens about the quality & character of the city, andimprove San Angelos ability to attract and maintain economic development assets. Project locations have been outlined and preliminarily acceptedby the Wayfinding Steering Committee.Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $285,922 Not Completing Project UndeterminedLocation of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address: Street Address City State 1) City Wide San Angelo Texas 68
    • City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvement ProgramResponsible Dept: MPO Project Manager: Doray Hill, Jr.Financial Plan: Prior Budget Projected Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total $ - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - $ 5,000,000Description:Improve Pedestrian access in neighborhoods and around schools. To include sidewalks, sidewalk improvements, ped/bike crossing improvements,off-street bike/ped facilities, bike lanes, bus shelters, improved crosswalks, and crosswalks. This project will be primarily for neighborhoods locatedin northeast San Angelo.Supporting planning document(s):Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Metropolitan Transportation Plan, Pedestrian-Transit Master Plan, COSA Comprehensive Plan Project Cost: